Crystal structure details of Vibrio fischeri DarR and mutant DarR-M202I from LTTR family reveals their activation mechanism

The LysR family transcriptional regulator ORF-L16 regulates spinosad biosynthesis in Saccharopolyspora spinosa

Spinosad, a potent broad-spectrum bioinsecticide produced by Saccharopolyspora spinosa, has significant market potential. Despite its effectiveness, the regulatory mechanisms of spinosad biosynthesis remain unclear. Our investigation identified the crucial role of the LysR family transcriptional regulator ORF-L16, located upstream of spinosad biosynthetic genes, in spinosad biosynthesis. Through reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5'-Race), we unveiled that the spinosad biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) contains six transcription units and seven promoters. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) demonstrated that ORF-L16 bound to seven promoters within the spinosad BGC, indicating its involvement in regulating spinosad biosynthesis. Notably, deletion of ORF-L16 led to a drastic reduction in spinosad production from 1818.73 mg/L to 1.69 mg/L, accompanied by decreased transcription levels of spinosad biosynthetic genes, confirming its positive regulatory function. Additionally, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and EMSA confirmed that spinosyn A, the main product of the spinosad BGC, served as an effector of ORF-L16. Specifically, it decreased the binding affinity between ORF-L16 and spinosad BGC promoters, thus exerting negative feedback regulation on spinosad biosynthesis. This research enhances our comprehension of spinosad biosynthesis regulation and lays the groundwork for future investigations on transcriptional regulators in S. spinosa.

Fundamentals and Exceptions of the LysR-type Transcriptional Regulators

LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) are emerging as a promising group of macromolecules for the field of biosensors. As the largest family of bacterial transcription factors, the LTTRs represent a vast and mostly untapped repertoire of sensor proteins. To fully harness these regulators for transcription factor-based biosensor development, it is crucial to understand their underlying mechanisms and functionalities. In the first part, this Review discusses the established model and features of LTTRs. As dual-function regulators, these inducible transcription factors exude precise control over their regulatory targets. In the second part of this Review, an overview is given of the exceptions to the "classic" LTTR model. While a general regulatory mechanism has helped elucidate the intricate regulation performed by LTTRs, it is essential to recognize the variations within the family. By combining this knowledge, characterization of new regulators can be done more efficiently and accurately, accelerating the expansion of transcriptional sensors for biosensor development. Unlocking the pool of LTTRs would significantly expand the currently limited range of detectable molecules and regulatory functions available for the implementation of novel synthetic genetic circuitry.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulator PvrA binds simultaneously to multiple pseudo-palindromic sites for efficient transcription activation

Tetracycline repressor (TetR) family regulators (TFRs) are the largest group of DNA-binding transcription factors and are widely distributed in bacteria and archaea. TFRs play vital roles in controlling the expression of various genes and regulating diverse physiological processes. Recently, a TFR protein Pseudomonas virulence regulator A (PvrA), was identified from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the transcriptional activator of genes involved in fatty acid utilization and bacterial virulence. Here, we show that PvrA can simultaneously bind to multiple pseudo-palindromic sites and upregulate the expression levels of target genes. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis indicates the simultaneous DNA recognition mechanism of PvrA and suggests that the bound DNA fragments consist of a distorted B-DNA double helix. The crystal structure and functional analysis of PvrA reveal a hinge region that secures the correct domain motion for recognition of the promiscuous promoter. Additionally, our results showed that mutations disrupting the regulatory hinge region have differential effects on biofilm formation and pyocyanin biosynthesis, resulting in attenuated bacterial virulence. Collectively, these findings will improve the understanding of the relationship between the structure and function of the TetR family and provide new insights into the mechanism of regulation of P. aeruginosa virulence.

Versatility and Complexity: Common and Uncommon Facets of LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulators

LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) form one of the largest families of bacterial regulators. They are widely distributed and contribute to all aspects of metabolism and physiology. Most are homotetramers, with each subunit composed of an N-terminal DNA-binding domain followed by a long helix connecting to an effector-binding domain. LTTRs typically bind DNA in the presence or absence of a small-molecule ligand (effector). In response to cellular signals, conformational changes alter DNA interactions, contact with RNA polymerase, and sometimes contact with other proteins. Many are dual-function repressor-activators, although different modes of regulation may occur at multiple promoters. This review presents an update on the molecular basis of regulation, the complexity of regulatory schemes, and applications in biotechnology and medicine. The abundance of LTTRs reflects their versatility and importance. While a single regulatory model cannot describe all family members, a comparison of similarities and differences provides a framework for future study.

Directed evolution of linker helix as an efficient strategy for engineering LysR-type transcriptional regulators as whole-cell biosensors

Whole-cell biosensors based on transcriptional regulators are powerful tools for rapid measurement, high-throughput screening, dynamic metabolic regulation, etc. To optimize the biosensing performance of transcriptional regulator, its effector-binding domain is commonly engineered. However, this strategy is encumbered by the limitation of diversifying such a large domain and the risk of affecting effector specificity. Molecular dynamics simulation of effector binding of LysG (an LysR-type transcriptional regulator, LTTR) suggests the crucial role of the short linker helix (LH) connecting effector- and DNA-binding domains in protein conformational change. Directed evolution of LH efficiently produced LysG variants with extended operational range and unaltered effector specificity. The whole-cell biosensor based on the best LysG^E58V variant outperformed the wild-type LysG in enzyme high-throughput screening and dynamic regulation of l-lysine biosynthetic pathway. LH mutations are suggested to affect DNA binding and facilitate transcriptional activation upon effector binding. LH engineering was also successfully applied to optimize another LTTR BenM for biosensing. Since LTTRs represent the largest family of prokaryotic transcriptional regulators with highly conserved structures, LH engineering is an efficient and universal strategy for development and optimization of whole-cell biosensors.

Regulation of l- and d-Aspartate Transport and Metabolism in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1

The regulated uptake and consumption of d-amino acids by bacteria remain largely unexplored, despite the physiological importance of these compounds. Unlike other characterized bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, which utilizes only l-Asp, Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 can consume both d-Asp and l-Asp as the sole carbon or nitrogen source. As described here, two LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs), DarR and AalR, control d- and l-Asp metabolism in strain ADP1. Heterologous expression of A. baylyi proteins enabled E. coli to use d-Asp as the carbon source when either of two transporters (AspT or AspY) and a racemase (RacD) were coexpressed. A third transporter, designated AspS, was also discovered to transport Asp in ADP1. DarR and/or AalR controlled the transcription of aspT, aspY, racD, and aspA (which encodes aspartate ammonia lyase). Conserved residues in the N-terminal DNA-binding domains of both regulators likely enable them to recognize the same DNA consensus sequence (ATGC-N₇-GCAT) in several operator-promoter regions. In strains lacking AalR, suppressor mutations revealed a role for the ClpAP protease in Asp metabolism. In the absence of the ClpA component of this protease, DarR can compensate for the loss of AalR. ADP1 consumed l- and d-Asn and l-Glu, but not d-Glu, as the sole carbon or nitrogen source using interrelated pathways. IMPORTANCE A regulatory scheme was revealed in which AalR responds to l-Asp and DarR responds to d-Asp, a molecule with critical signaling functions in many organisms. The RacD-mediated interconversion of these isomers causes overlap in transcriptional control in A. baylyi. Our studies improve understanding of transport and regulation and lay the foundation for determining how regulators distinguish l- and d-enantiomers. These studies are relevant for biotechnology applications, and they highlight the importance of d-amino acids as natural bacterial growth substrates.