The role of repeating optimization of atrioventricular interval during interim and long-term follow-up after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy beyond Nominal Settings: An IEGM-Based Approach for Paced and Sensed Atrioventricular Delay Offset Optimization in Daily Clinical Practice

Optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) delay has been performed in several landmark trials in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), although it is often not performed in daily practice. Our aim was to study optimal AV delays and investigate a simple intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based optimization approach. 328 CRT patients with paired IEGM and echocardiography optimization data were included in our single-center observational study. Sensed (sAV) and paced (pAV) AV delays were optimized using an iterative echocardiography method. The offset between sAV and pAV delays was calculated using the IEGM method. The mean age of the patients was 69 ± 12 years; 64% were men, 48% had ischemic etiology of heart failure. During echocardiographic optimization, an offset of 73 ± 18 ms was found, differing from nominal AV settings (p < 0.001). Based on the IEGM method, the optimal offset was 75 ± 25 ms. The echocardiographic and IEGM-generated AV offset delays showed good correlation (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.001) and good agreement according to Bland-Altman plot analysis. CRT responders had a near zero offset difference between IEGM and echo optimization (-0.2 ± 17 ms), while non-responders had an offset difference of 6 ± 17 ms, p = 0.006. In conclusion, optimal AV delays are patient-specific and differ from nominal settings. pAV delay can easily be calculated from IEGM after sAV delay optimization.

Usefulness of Optimization of Interventricular Delay Using an Electrical Cardiometry Method in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation

There are no studies examining interventricular (VV) delay optimization by an electrical cardiometry method in relation to subsequent cardiac function in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) -implanted patients. This study aimed to compare the VV delay in CRT-implanted patients by the dp/dt and electrical cardiometry and to examine the optimization of VV delay and improvement of cardiac function. We examined 19 consecutive CRT-implanted patients. The protocol included biventricular stimulation with either simultaneous or sequential pacing, and we evaluated systolic volume (SV) using an electrical cardiometry and the dp/dt of the left ventricle. The optimal VV delay was determined by the maximum SV using the electrical cardiometry. Two groups were defined, those whose increase in SV was at or above the median and those whose SV increase was below the median; changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The correlation between the VV delay optimized by the electrical cardiometry and dp/dt methods was high (R = 0.61, P = 0.006). Compared to the baseline SV (43.4 mL), the SV increased to 47.8 mL with simultaneous biventricular pacing (versus baseline P = 0.008) and further increased to 49.8 mL with optimized VV delay (versus simultaneous biventricular pacing P = 0.020). LVEF after 6 months significantly improved in the above-median SV increase group (37.6 versus 28.2%, P = 0.041), but not in the below-median SV increase group (26.5 versus 26.5%, P = 0.985). In conclusion, the optimal VV delay by electrical cardiometry method was almost concordant with that by the dp/dt method. Cardiac function significantly improved in the group with the above-median SV increase.

Usefulness of Hemodynamic Device-Based Optimization in Heterogeneous Patients Implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator

Optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings of the CRT is the most supposed correctable variable to improve the rate of CRT responder. The aim of the present study has been to evaluate if there is a specific subgroup of patients who can actually benefit the most from a hemodynamic optimization of AV. This is a prospective, observational single-center study that enrolled consecutive patients with clinical indication for CRT; all patients were implanted with CRT-D devices with SonR technology, able to automatically adjust AV and VV delay on a weekly basis. Among 57 patients, 39 (69%) showed a LVESV reduction > 15%. The SonR was able to modify the pacing parameters, but an increase of left atrial diameter was associated to a reduced AV variability, suggesting that an impaired left atrial function could potentially reduce the ability of the SonR algorithm to adjust the correct timing of pacing. Graphical abstract Patients with respectively a high (A) and low (B) AV timing variability, among several parameters that could potentially influence the AV timing, only left atrial dimensions demonstrated a significant impact. In fact an increase of left atrial diameter was associated to a reduced AV variability, suggesting that an impaired left atrial function could potentially reduce the ability of the SonR algorithm to adjust the correct timing of pacing.

Long-Term Effect of Different Optimizing Methods for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study

AIM

During cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), optimized programming of the atrioventricular (AV) delay and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) interval can lead to improved hemodynamics, symptomatic response, and left ventricular systolic function. Currently, however, there is no recommendation for the best optimization method. This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of 4 different CRT optimization methods.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four consecutive CRT patients with severe heart failure and left bundle-branch block configuration were randomly assigned into four groups to undergo AV/VV delay optimization through echocardiogram (ECHO; n = 30), electrocardiogram (ECG; n = 32), QuickOpt algorithm (n = 28), and nominal AV/VV (n = 36) groups. Patients were followed up and underwent examinations, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), and echocardiography, at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The patients' survival and clinical outcomes were compared among the four groups.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that the median survival was the same in the 4 groups: ECHO, 43 months; ECG, 44 months; QuickOpt, 44 months, and nominal, 41 months. At the 6-month follow-up, the reduction in left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was significantly less in the nominal group (-1.91 ± 2.58 mm) than that in the other three groups (ECHO: -3.70 ± 2.78 mm, p = 0.012; ECG: -3.53 ± 3.14 mm, p = 0.020; QuickOpt: -3.46 ± 2.65 mm, p = 0.032); 6MWD was significantly shorter in the nominal group (87.88 ± 34.76 m) than that in the other three groups (ECHO: 120.63 ± 56.93 m, p = 0.006; ECG: 114.97 ± 54.95 m, p = 0.020; QuickOpt: 114.57 ± 35.41 m, p = 0.027). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased in ECHO (7.23 ± 2.76%, p = 0.010), ECG (8.50 ± 3.17%, p < 0.001), and QuickOpt (8.39 ± 2.90%, p < 0.001) compared with the nominal group (5.35 ± 2.59%). There were no significant differences among the groups in the aforementioned parameters at 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While LVEDD, LVEF, 6MWD, and NYHA were significantly improved in ECHO, ECG, and QuickOpt at 6 months, there were no significant improvements in any of the groups at 12, 24, and 48 months. These findings suggested that the long-term effect of the four CRT methods for heart failure was not significantly different.

Clinical assessment of intraventricular blood transport in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

In the healthy heart, left ventricular (LV) filling generates different flow patterns which have been proposed to optimize blood transport by coupling diastole and systole. This work presents a novel image-based method to assess how different flow patterns influence LV blood transport in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our approach is based on solving the advection equation for a passive scalar field from time-resolved blood velocity fields. Imposing time-varying inflow boundary conditions for the scalar field provides a straightforward method to distinctly track the transport of blood entering the LV in the different filling waves of a given cardiac cycle, as well as the transport barriers which couple filling and ejection. We applied this method to analyze flow transport in a group of patients with implanted CRT devices and a group of healthy volunteers. Velocity fields were obtained using echocardiographic color Doppler velocimetry, which provides two-dimensional time-resolved flow maps in the apical long axis three-chamber view of the LV. In the patients under CRT, the device programming was varied to analyze flow transport under different values of the atrioventricular conduction delay, and to model tachycardia (100 bpm). Using this method, we show how CRT influences the transit of blood inside the left ventricle, contributes to conserving kinetic energy, and favors the generation of hemodynamic forces that accelerate blood in the direction of the LV outflow tract. These novel aspects of ventricular function are clinically accessible by quantitative analysis of color-Doppler echocardiograms.

The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Many patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy; however, approximately 30% of patients do not experience significant clinical improvement with this treatment. AV and VV delay optimization techniques have included echocardiography, device-based algorithms, and several other novel noninvasive techniques. Using these techniques to optimize device settings has been shown to improve hemodynamic function acutely; however, the long-term clinical benefit is limited. In most cases, an empiric AV delay with simultaneous biventricular or left ventricular pacing is adequate. The value of optimization of these intervals in "nonresponders" still requires further investigation.

Vector selection of a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead affects acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized cross-over trial

Background

A suboptimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site may account for non-responsiveness of patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The vector selection of a novel quadripolar LV pacing lead, which was mainly developed to overcome technical issues with stimulation thresholds and phrenic nerve capture, may affect hemodynamic response, and was therefore assessed in this study. (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00000573).

Methods and Results

Hemodynamic effects of a total of 145 LVPCs (9.1 per patient) of CRT devices with a quadripolar LV lead (Quartet™, St. Jude Medical) were assessed in 16/20 consecutive patients by invasive measurement of LV+dP/dt_max at an invasively optimized AV-interval in random order. Optimal (worst) LVPCs per patient were identified as those with maximal (minimal) %change in LV+dP/dt_max (%ΔLV+dP/dt_max) as compared to a preceding baseline. LV+dP/dt_max significantly increased in all 145 LVPCs (p<0.0001 compared to baseline) with significant intraindividual differences between LVPCs (p<0.0001). Overall, CRT acutely augmented %ΔLV+dP/dt_max by 31.3% (95% CI 24%–39%) in the optimal, by 21.3% (95% CI: 15%–27%) in the worst and by 28.2% (95% CI: 21%–36%) in a default distal LVPC. This resulted in an absolute additional acute increase in %ΔLV+dP/dt_max of 10.0% (95% CI: 7%–13%) of the optimal when compared to the worst (p<0.0001), and of 3.1% (95% CI: 1%–5%) of the optimal when compared to the default distal LVPC (p<0.001). Optimal LVPCs were not programmable with a standard bipolar lead in 44% (7/16) of patients.

Conclusion

The pacing configuration of a quadripolar LV lead determinates acute hemodynamic response. Pacing in the individually optimized configuration gives rise to an additional absolute 10% increase in %ΔLV+dP/dt_max when comparing optimal and worst vectors.

Association between frequent cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization and long-term clinical response: a post hoc analysis of the Clinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization (CLEAR) pilot study

Aims

The long-term clinical value of the optimization of atrioventricular (AVD) and interventricular (VVD) delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains controversial. We studied retrospectively the association between the frequency of AVD and VVD optimization and 1-year clinical outcomes in the 199 CRT patients who completed the Clinical Evaluation on Advanced Resynchronization study.

Methods and results

From the 199 patients assigned to CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) (New York Heart Association, NYHA, class III/IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%), two groups were retrospectively composed a posteriori on the basis of the frequency of their AVD and VVD optimization: Group 1 (n = 66) was composed of patients ‘systematically’ optimized at implant, at 3 and 6 months; Group 2 (n = 133) was composed of all other patients optimized ‘non-systematically’ (less than three times) during the 1 year study. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure-related hospitalization, NYHA functional class, and Quality of Life score, at 1 year. Systematic CRT optimization was associated with a higher percentage of improved patients based on the composite endpoint (85% in Group 1 vs. 61% in Group 2, P < 0.001), with fewer deaths (3% in Group 1 vs. 14% in Group 2, P = 0.014) and fewer hospitalizations (8% in Group 1 vs. 23% in Group 2, P = 0.007), at 1 year.

Conclusion

These results further suggest that AVD and VVD frequent optimization (at implant, at 3 and 6 months) is associated with improved long-term clinical response in CRT-P patients.

Long-term clinical effects of programmer-guided atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization: Intracardiac electrography versus echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure

Objectives

To compare the haemodynamic results and long-term clinical outcomes of intracardiac electrography (QuickOpt®; St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) and echocardiography for optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

Patients with CRT devices were prospectively enrolled; AV/VV delays were optimized by either QuickOpt® or echocardiography. Patients in the QuickOpt® group underwent both echocardiography and QuickOpt® optimization, and QuickOpt® AV/VV delays were used to program the CRT. All patients were followed-up for 12 months.

Results

In total, 44 patients were enrolled. There was good correlation between AV/VV delays determined by QuickOpt® ( n = 20) and echocardiography ( n = 24). QuickOpt® was significantly faster than echocardiography-guided optimization. Cardiac function, 6-min walking distance and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly and similarly improved in both groups at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. In the QuickOpt® group, left ventricular end diastolic diameters were significantly smaller at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline.

Conclusions

QuickOpt® is a quick, convenient and easy to perform method for optimization of AV and VV delays, with a similar long-term clinical outcome to echocardiography-guided optimization.

Optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy using a device for non-invasive measurement of cardiac index at rest and during exercise

AIMS

It is not clear whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) should only be optimized at rest or whether it is necessary to perform CRT optimization during exercise. Our study aims to answer this question by using an inert gas rebreathing method (Innocor®).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with congestive heart failure and implanted CRT devices were included in the study. The aetiology of the heart failure was ischaemic in nine (33%) patients. Patients had low left ventricular ejection fraction (29 ± 8%) and enlarged LV end-diastolic diameters (63 ± 7 mm). Atrioventricular delay (AVD) was optimized at rest according to cardiac index (CI), measured by inert gas rebreathing (Innocor®). Thereafter, patients performed standardized, steady-state bicycle exercise at 30 W in sitting body position. Three AVDs were tested during exercise in a random sequence: optimized resting AVD (AVD(opt)) according to baseline measurement; AVD(opt) - 30 ms; and AVD(opt) + 30 ms. Cardiac index was measured in each AVD by inert gas rebreathing. Cardiac index increased significantly during exercise. However, neither AVD(opt) shortening nor prolongation during exercise had significant effect on CI (shortening of AVD(opt) - 30 ms was accompanied by a reduction of CI of 4.8%, prolongation of AVD(opt) + 30 ms was accompanied by a reduction of CI of 7.7%).

CONCLUSION

Shortening or lengthening of the AVD during exercise has no impact on CI in CRT patients. On the basis of our results, we conclude that in CRT patients the AVD should be programmed, fixed even during exercise.

When is an optimization not an optimization? Evaluation of clinical implications of information content (signal-to-noise ratio) in optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and how to measure and maximize it

Impact of variability in the measured parameter is rarely considered in designing clinical protocols for optimization of atrioventricular (AV) or interventricular (VV) delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In this article, we approach this question quantitatively using mathematical simulation in which the true optimum is known and examine practical implications using some real measurements. We calculated the performance of any optimization process that selects the pacing setting which maximizes an underlying signal, such as flow or pressure, in the presence of overlying random variability (noise). If signal and noise are of equal size, for a 5-choice optimization (60, 100, 140, 180, 220 ms), replicate AV delay optima are rarely identical but rather scattered with a standard deviation of 45 ms. This scatter was overwhelmingly determined (ρ = -0.975, P < 0.001) by Information Content, [Formula: see text], an expression of signal-to-noise ratio. Averaging multiple replicates improves information content. In real clinical data, at resting, heart rate information content is often only 0.2-0.3; elevated pacing rates can raise information content above 0.5. Low information content (e.g. <0.5) causes gross overestimation of optimization-induced increment in VTI, high false-positive appearance of change in optimum between visits and very wide confidence intervals of individual patient optimum. AV and VV optimization by selecting the setting showing maximum cardiac function can only be accurate if information content is high. Simple steps to reduce noise such as averaging multiple replicates, or to increase signal such as increasing heart rate, can improve information content, and therefore viability, of any optimization process.

Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has dramatically improved the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure in large randomized clinical trials. Optimization of device settings may maximize benefit on an individual basis, although the best method for this is not yet established. We evaluated the use of cardiogenic impedance measurements (derived from intracardiac impedance signals) in CRT device optimization, using invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax as the reference.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment using a pressure wire placed in the LV cavity at the time of CRT device implantation. Intracardiac impedance measurements were made at different atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays and compared with LV dP/dtmax. We assessed the performance of patient-specific and generic impedance-based models in predicting acute haemodynamic response to CRT. In two patients, LV catheterization with the pressure wire was unsuccessful and in two patients LV lead delivery was unsuccessful; therefore, data were acquired for 13 out of 17 patients. Left ventricular dP/dtmax was 919±182 mmHg/s at baseline and this increased acutely (by 24%) to 1121±226 mmHg/s as a result of CRT. The patient-specific impedance-based model correctly predicted the optimal haemodynamic response (to within 5% points) for AV and VV delays in 90 and 92% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cardiogenic impedance measurements are capable of correctly identifying the maximum achievable LV dP/dtmax as measured by invasive haemodynamic assessment. This study suggests that cardiogenic impedance can potentially be used for CRT optimization and may have a role in ambulatory assessment of haemodynamics.

A prospective comparison of echocardiography and device algorithms for atrioventricular and interventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is costly, time-consuming, and requires skill and expertise so is usually undertaken only in 'non-responder' patients. An algorithm in St Jude Medical CRT devices (QuickOpt) claims to optimize these settings automatically. The aim of this study was to compare the two optimization techniques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Optimization of AV and VV intervals was performed a month after CRT device implantation in 26 patients with heart failure, first by echocardiography then by QuickOpt. The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity-time integral (VTI) was measured after optimization by each method. Agreement between the optimization methods was assessed by the Bland-Altman analysis and correlation by Pearson's correlation coefficient. There was good correlation between the LVOT VTI following optimization by both methods (R2 = 0.77, P < 0.001). However, agreement between the two methods was poor, with 15 of 26 and 10 of 26 patients having a >20 ms difference in the optimal AV and VV interval values, respectively. Left ventricular outflow tract VTI was significantly better (22 of 26 patients; P < 0.001) in patients optimized by echocardiography than by QuickOpt.

CONCLUSION

There is a poor agreement in optimal AV and VV intervals determined by echocardiography and QuickOpt, with echocardiographic optimization giving a superior haemodynamic outcome.

Measurement precision in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients. Whether atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) pacing interval optimization confers further clinical improvement remains unclear. A variety of techniques are used to estimate optimum AV/VV intervals; however, the precision of their estimates and the ramifications of an imprecise estimate have not been characterized previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An objective methodology for quantifying the precision of estimated optimum AV/VV intervals was developed, allowing physiologic effects to be distinguished from measurement variability. Optimization using multiple conventional techniques was conducted in individual sessions with 20 patients. Measures of stroke volume and dyssynchrony were obtained using impedance cardiography and echocardiographic methods, specifically, aortic velocity-time integral, mitral velocity-time integral, A-wave truncation, and septal-posterior wall motion delay. Echocardiographic methods yielded statistically insignificant data in the majority of patients (62%-82%). In contrast, impedance cardiography yielded statistically significant results in 84% and 75% of patients for AV and VV interval optimization, respectively. Individual cases demonstrated that accepting a plausible but statistically insignificant estimated optimum AV or VV interval can result in worse cardiac function than default values.

CONCLUSIONS

Consideration of statistical significance is critical for validating clinical optimization data in individual patients and for comparing competing optimization techniques. Accepting an estimated optimum without knowledge of its precision can result in worse cardiac function than default settings and a misinterpretation of observed changes over time. In this study, only impedance cardiography yielded statistically significant AV and VV interval optimization data in the majority of patients.

[Optimized CRT programming: relevance and practical application]

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can result in significant clinical improvement in patients with congestive heart failure. Non-response to CRT might be attributable to suboptimal programming. Follow-up has to ensure effective left ventricular (LV) stimulation at rest and also sufficient exercise-dependent atrial rates. Rate adaptive pacing is required in case of chronotropic incompetence. Specific algorithms may help to restore biventricular pacing or the enhance biventricular pacing rate when intrinsic AV conduction occurs, e.g., during intermittent atrial fibrillation. An individual adaptation of the AV interval is essential to achieve maximal benefit from resynchronization. Optimized AV interval programming synchronizes atrial and ventricular contraction, maximizing the atrial contribution to LV diastolic filling and preventing presystolic mitral regurgitation. Interventricular synchrony and LV contraction might be further harmonized by VV interval adaptation, although the impact of VV optimization on CRT outcome is still under debate. Non-invasive methods of AV and VV interval optimization by electro- and echocardiography are discussed.

Echocardiographic optimization of the atrioventricular and interventricular intervals during cardiac resynchronization

An optimized atrioventricular (AV) interval can maximize the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). If programmed poorly, it may curtail beneficial effects of CRT. AV optimization will not convert non-responder to responder, but may convert under-responder to improved status. There are many echocardiographic techniques for AV optimization but there is no universally accepted gold standard. The optimal AV delay varies with time, necessitating periodic re-evaluation. As the optimal AV delay may lengthen on exercise, a rate-adaptive AV delay should not be routinely programmed. Intra- and interatrial conduction delays may require AV junctional ablation when AV optimization is impossible in patients with a poor clinical response. Fusion with the spontaneous QRS complex may be acceptable on a trial basis to seek a better clinical response or with a short PR interval. Routine VV optimization is presently controversial but programming may prove beneficial in some patients with a suboptimal CRT response where no cause is found. It may partially compensate for less than optimal left ventricular (LV) lead position and may correct for heterogeneous ventricular activation including a prolonged LV latency interval and slow conduction (scarring) near the LV pacing site. VV timing is generally programmed using the aortic velocity-time integral, and long-term variations of the optimal value necessitate periodic re-evaluation.