Long-term comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matched analysis

Comparison of P-wave parameter changes after radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) can be performed using one-shot cryoballoon ablation (cryo) or point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RF). This study compares the changes in P-wave parameters between both ablation methods.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included contact force RF and second-generation cryo for PAF between 2018 and 2019. Procedure success was defined by freedom of ECG-documented AF at 12 months. Digital 12‑leads ECGs with 1-50 hertz bandpass filters were monitored directly during the procedure. Corrected P-wave duration (PWDc), P-wave voltage (PWV), P-wave dispersion (PWDisp), and P-wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) were measured and compared between RF and cryo. Additional ablations outside pulmonary veins were excluded.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 226 patients, and the freedom of AF rate was similar at the 12-month follow-up between RF and cryo (76 % vs 74 %, P = 0.12). PWDc and PWV increased and decreased, respectively in both arms. PTFV1 decreased in RF (-3.3 mm.s to -4.6 mm.s, P < 0.001) and cryo (-3.4 mm.s to -5.3 mm.s,P = 0.002). There were similar changes after RF and cryo in PWDc (F11, 1032 = 0.80, P = 0.85), PWV (F11, 1032 = 0.19,P = 0.06), and PWDisp (F11, 1032 = 0.16,P = 0.34) and PTFV1 (P = 0.39). Increased PWDc was correlated with failure of RF (hazard ratio [2.3], 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-5.9, p = 0.01) and cryo (HR: 2.1, 95 % CI (1.3-4.6), p = 0.02). Results were similar when patients on antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded.

CONCLUSION

RF and cryo caused similar freedom of AF rate at 12 months in PAF and similar P-wave parameter changes.

Safety of different therapies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Most published studies have aimed to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), while few articles have comprehensively compared the safety of therapeutic measures.The aim of the article was to assess the safety of different therapeutic measures (different ablation techniques, antiarrhythmic drugs and surgery) in patients with AF.

METHOD

A comprehensive and systematic search was undertaken across various databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the aim of identifying pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that delve into the safety aspects of diverse atrial fibrillation treatment strategies. The search was conducted up until December 1st, 2023. R4.2.3 software gemtc package was used for data analysis, Review Manager 5.3 was used for quality assessment of included studies, and stata15.0 was used for publication bias.Safety is defined as the adverse outcomes that occur in different treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation, with specific adverse events as described below.

RESULT

22 RCTs (involving 5073 subjects) with interventions including cryoballoon ablation (CA), radiofrequency ablation (RF), laser balloon ablation (LB), pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADS), and surgery (SA) were included in this study. In this article, medication and surgery were combined into the same intervention (non-traditional treatment measure, UT). UT was not associated with pericardial effusion (OR:4.27e-10, 95%CI:4.91e-30-0.0663), infections (OR:0.248, 95%CI:0.0584-0.89), arrhythmias (OR:0.609,95%CI:0.393-0.936), pseudoaneurysms (OR:5.57e-10, 95%CI:1.16e-31-0.934) and pulmonary vein stenosis (OR:1.16e-09, 95%CI:6.56e-24-0.194). Complications of the procedure were mainly mechanical injuries. Among the various ablation strategies, radiofrequency ablation had a lower incidence of phrenic nerve palsy and pain (OR:4.01e-06, 95%CI:1.18e-17-0.710) than cryoballoon ablation, which was superior to radiofrequency ablation in terms of infection rates. Finally, there were no significant differences between the various ablation techniques in terms of other complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Because the interventions in the UT group were predominantly AADS and antiarrhythmic drug therapy didn't have some of the common aggressive complications of ablation strategies, the UT group had a low rate of complications such as pericardial effusion, postprocedural arrhythmia, pseudoaneurysm, and pulmonary vein stenosis compared with various catheter ablation strategies. Additionally, we also discovered between the various ablation technology groups, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse events.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registry number:CRD42024566530.

A meta-analysis and cost-minimization analysis of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Previous studies have shown inconsistent results in clinical effectiveness between cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cost assessment between the procedures is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness between the procedures in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The primary outcome for the meta-analysis was long-term AF recurrence. Following the results of the meta-analysis, the cost-effectiveness of CBA versus RFA in Japan was assessed.

Results

The meta-analysis included 12 randomized controlled trials and six propensity-score matching cohort studies. AF recurrence was slightly lower in patients referred for CBA than for RFA, with an integrated risk ratio of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.07) and an integrated hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.19), but no significant difference was found. A cost-minimization analysis was conducted to compare the medical costs of CBA versus RFA because there was no significant difference in the risk of AF recurrence between the procedures. The estimated costs for CBA and RFA were JPY 4 858 544 (USD 32 390) and JPY 4 505 255 (USD 30 035), respectively, with cost savings for RFA of JPY 353 289 (USD 2355).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis suggests that CBA provides comparable benefits with regard to AF recurrence compared with RFA, as shown in previous studies. Although the choice of treatment should be based on patient and treatment characteristics, RFA was shown that it might be cost saving as compared to CBA.

Ablation therapies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and patient-level network meta-analysis

Introduction: Despite promising trials, catheter ablation is still regarded as an adjunct to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various ablation therapies and AAD. Method: Randomised controlled trials or propensity score-matched studies comparing atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence among any combination of ablation modalities or AAD were retrieved. Kaplan-Meier curves and risk tables for this outcome were graphically reconstructed to extract patient-level data. Frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) using derived hazard ratios (HRs), as well as 2 restricted mean survival time (RMST) NMAs, were conducted. Treatment strategies were ranked using P-scores. Results: Across 24 studies comparing 6 ablation therapies (5,132 patients), Frequentist NMA-derived HRs of atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to AAD were 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.25–0.48) for cryoballoon ablation (CBA), 0.34 (95% CI=0.25–0.47) for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 0.14 (95% CI=0.07–0.30) for combined CBA and RFA, 0.20 (95% CI=0.10–0.41) for hot-balloon ablation, 0.43 (95% CI=0.15–1.26) for laser-balloon ablation (LBA), and 0.33 (95% CI=0.18–0.62) for pulmonary vein ablation catheter. RMST-based NMAs similarly showed significant benefit of all ablation therapies over AAD. The combination of CBA + RFA showed promising long-term superiority over CBA and RFA, while LBA showed favourable short-term efficacy. Conclusion: The advantage of ablation therapies over AAD in preventing atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence suggests that ablation should be considered as the first-line treatment for PAF in patients fit for the procedure. The promising nature of several specific therapies warrants further trials to elicit their long-term efficacy and perform a cost-benefit analysis. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, network meta-analysis

Clinical outcome of a single procedure cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A real-world multicenter experience in Portugal

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been growing as an alternative technique, not only in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) but also in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon ablation has demonstrated encouraging acute and mid-term results. However, data on long-term follow-up of CB-based PVI are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of CBA in PAF and persistent AF in four Portuguese centers.

METHODS

All patients that were treated with the cryoballoon catheter according to routine practices with a second-generation 28-mm CB in four centers were included. This was a retrospective, non-randomized analysis. Patients were followed-up for >12 months and freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) was evaluated at the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Four hundred and six patients (57.7±12.4 years, 66% men) participated. AF was paroxysmal in 326 patients (80.2%) and persistent in 80 (19.7%). The mean procedure time duration was 107.7±50.9 min, and the fluoroscopy time was 19.5±9.7 min. Procedural/periprocedural complications occurred in 30 cases (7.3%), being transient phrenic nerve palsy the most frequent incident (2 out of 3 complications). Anatomic variations of the PV were present in 16.1% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 22.0±15.0 months, 310 patients (76.3%) remained in stable sinus rhythm, with at least one AF episode recurrence documented in 98 cases (24.1%). The recurrence rate was 20.5% in the PAF group and 37.8% in the persistent AF group.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter experience, a single CBA procedure resulted in 75.9% freedom from AF at a 22-month follow-up. This technique was demonstrated to be a safe and effective option in experienced centers for the treatment of PAF and PersAF.

Echocardiographic assessment of left atrial function for prediction of efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Proper selection for catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is still an issue. Echocardiographic assessment of left atrium (LA) is complex and challenging. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) with recent standardized LA deformation analysis allows for the quantitative assessment of various LA function parameters. We aimed to assess the value of detailed evaluations of LA function using STE in patients with non-valvular AF without structural heart disease to predict the outcomes after CA for AF. Secondary aim was to analyze the prediction of CA efficacy in patients with normal LA dimension in baseline echocardiography.We studied with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography 82 patients (58% males, mean age 57.3 ± 9.5 years) with non-valvular paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease scheduled for CA. Peak longitudinal LA strain (LAS) and strain rate (LASR) during the reservoir (r), conduit (cd) and contraction (ct) phases were measured by STE before the procedure. Patients were followed for 1 year using serial 4 to 7 day Holter ECG monitoring.Complete freedom from any AF recurrence was achieved in 44 (54%) patients. All patients had normal left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and 53 (65%) of them had not enlarged LA. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, global left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) was identified as an independent predictor of CA efficacy (OR [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.17-1.55], P < .0001). The opportunity of CA success was 135 fold higher for each 1% increase in global LASr.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified global LASr and left atrial conduit strain (LAScd) as the most powerful parameters for predicting of CA outcome with an area under the curve of 0.896 and 0.860, respectively, in the whole study group, and 0.922 and 0.938, respectively, in patients with not enlarged LA.In patients with paroxysmal AF and normal standard echocardiographic assessment, parameters reflecting LA compliance - reservoir and conduit strain, are independent and strong predictors of CA outcome.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency as First Ablation Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Radiofrequency (RF) represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation, whereas cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a valid alternative. The aim of our meta-analysis was to explore the efficacy and safety of CB compared with RF as first ablation procedure for AF. We searched the literature for studies that investigated this issue. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence. The safety outcomes were: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications, and major bleedings. Fourteen randomized controlled studies and 34 observational studies were included in the analysis. A total of 7,951 patients underwent CB ablation, whereas 9,641 received RF ablation. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7 months. Overall, CB reduced the incidence of AF recurrence compared with RF ablation (relative risk [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.94; p = 0.001), and this result was consistent across different study design and AF type. CB had a significantly higher rate of phrenic nerve palsy, whereas it was related to a lower incidence of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.011) and vascular complications (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77; p <0.001) compared with RF. There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the 2 strategies. CB ablation had a shorter procedural time compared with RF (mean difference -20.76 minutes; p <0.001). In conclusion, considered its efficacy/safety profile and short procedural time, CB ablation represents the preferable option for first AF ablation procedure.

Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency lesions as detected by late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study

AIMS

Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a reliable modality to isolate pulmonary veins (PVs) in atrial fibrillation. Ablation lesions and the long-term effects of energy delivery can be assessed by delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR). The aim of the study was to compare the number, extension, and localization of gaps in CB and radiofrequency (RF) techniques in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients submitted to PVI with CB in whom DE-CMR images were available (n = 30) were matched (1:1) to patients who underwent PVI with RF (n = 30), considering age, sex, hypertension, and diabetes. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance was obtained at 3 months post-procedure, and images were processed to assess the mean number of gaps around PV ostia, their localization, and the normalized gap length (NGL), calculated as the difference between total gap length and total PV perimeter. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The CB and RF procedures did not differ in the mean number of gaps per patient (4.40 vs. 5.13 gaps, respectively; P = 0.21) nor NGL (0.35 vs. 0.32, P = 0.59). For both techniques, a higher mean number of gaps were detected in right vs. left PVs (3.18 vs. 1.58, respectively; P = 0.01). The incidence of recurrences did not differ between techniques (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66-4.97; P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Location and extension of ablation gaps in PVI did not differ between CB and RF groups in DE-CMR image analysis.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence after redo procedure-ablation modality impact

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation recurrence (AFR) is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the rate does not differ between radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the ablation modality used at the index PVI on the outcome after redo PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, non-randomized study, consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who have undergone the index PVI with either RF ablation (RF group) or 2nd-generation CB (CB group) were included. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrence of atrial arrhythmia lasting > 30 s.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients undergoing redo PVI for paroxysmal AF were included (median age 61 years; 24% female; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 57 ± 8%; left atrial volume index (LAVI) 34 ± 11 mm). Index PVI was done either with focal RF (n = 81) or with CB (n = 24) and redo PVI only with focal RF. Total procedure time (139 vs. 113 min, p = 0.10) and RF delivery time (1017 vs. 870 s, p = 0.33) of the redo PVI were not significantly different. After a median follow-up of 371 (185-470) days, there were no differences between the RF and CB groups regarding the AFR rate after the second PVI (24 vs. 23%, p = 0.89). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between the groups regarding AFR freedom time (p = 0.81). In multivariable logistic regression, only coronary artery disease was identified as an independent long-term predictor of AFR (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.17-14.71, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The ablation modality used at the index PVI has no impact on long-term outcome after redo PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Sex-specific efficacy and safety of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing healthcare burden, for which pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) represent attractive therapies. Women are at higher risk of recurrence after AF ablation and present a specific complications profile. Therefore, a systematic catheter-specific assessment of pulmonary vein isolation is urgently needed in women.

OBJECTIVE

Systematically assessing the sex-specific efficacy/safety of CB vs RF ablation.

METHODS

We performed a structured database search of the scientific literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational prospective studies (OPS) comparing CB and RF ablation efficacy at 1 year. We investigated the reporting of sex-specific analyses and assessed the comparative sex-specific efficacy, safety and procedural characteristics of CB vs RF using random-effect meta-regression accounting for the proportion of enrolled women.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included (18 OPS and 5 RCTs) for a total of 13 509 patients. Sex-specific outcomes by ablation device were reported in two and sex-specific regression in four studies, none of which took the ablation device into account. Meta-regression accounting for the proportion of enrolled women showed no significant difference in outcomes between RF or CB.

CONCLUSION

The sex-specific reporting in trials comparing CB to RF is extremely low. A quantitative meta-regression using the percentage of enrolled women as sex-specific indicator did not show any difference between CB and RF but acknowledging the low percentage of enrolled women and the lack of sex-specific data, further research including patient-level data is urgently needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ablation therapy is the treatment of choice in antiarrhythmic drugrefractory atrial fibrillation (AF). It is performed by either cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency ablation. CBA is gaining popularity due to simplicity with similar efficacy and complication rate compared with RFA. In this meta-analysis, we compare the recurrence rate of AF and the complications from CBA versus RFA for the treatment of AF.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed for the articles that compared the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was to compare the recurrence rate of AF between CBA and RFA. We also included subgroup analysis with complications of pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve palsy and cerebral microemboli following ablation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies with 3527 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. Recurrence of AF after CBA or RFA was similar in both groups (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.07; I2=48%, Cochrane p=0.16). In subgroup analysis, heterogeneity was less in paroxysmal AF (I2=0%, Cochrane p=0.46) compared to mixed AF (I2=72%, Cochrane p=0.003). Procedure and fluoroscopy time was less by 26.37 and 5.94 minutes respectively in CBA compared to RFA. Complications, pericardial effusion, and silent cerebral microemboli, were not different between the two groups, however, phrenic nerve palsy was exclusively present only in CBA group.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the effectiveness of CBA is similar to RFA in the treatment of AF with the added advantages of shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times.

High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T delta concentration after repeat pulmonary vein isolation

Introduction

Difference between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations (hs-cTnT) before and after ablation procedure (delta concentration) reflects the amount of myocardial injury. The aim of the study was to investigate hs-cTnT prognostic power for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure.

Materials and methods

Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing repeat PVI using a focal radiofrequency catheter were included in the study. Hs-cTnT was measured before and 18-24 hours after the procedure. Standardized 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up was performed. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify predictors of AF recurrence.

Results

A total of 105 patients undergoing repeat PVI were analysed (24% female, median age 61 years). Median (interquartile range) hs-cTnT delta after repeat PVI was 283 (127 - 489) ng/L. After a median follow-up of 12 months, AF recurred in 24 (23%) patients. A weak linear relationship between the total radiofrequency energy delivery time and delta hs-cTnT was observed (Pearson R² = 0.31, P = 0.030). Delta Hs-cTnT was not identified as a significant long-term predictor of AF recurrence after repeated PVI (P = 0.920).

Conclusion

This was the first study evaluating the prognostic power of delta hs-cTnT in predicting AF recurrence after repeat PVI. Delta hs-cTnT does not predict AF recurrence after repeat PVI procedures. Systematic measurement of hs-cTnT after repeat PVI does not add information relevant to outcome.

Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies

Aims

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate.

Methods and results

We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09).

Conclusion

In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF.

Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis

Introduction

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) are the main treatments for drug-refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety between CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF.

Material and methods

We searched the Embase and Medline databases for clinical studies published up to December 2016. Studies that satisfied our predefined inclusion criteria were included.

Results

After searching through the literature in the two major databases, 20 studies with a total of 9,141 patients were included in our study. The CBA had a significantly shorter procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD) –30.38 min; 95% CI: –46.43 to –14.33, p = 0.0002) and non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (WMD –3.18 min; 95% CI: –6.43 to 0.07, p = 0.06) compared with RFCA. There was no difference in freedom from AF between CBA and RFCA (CBA 78.55% vs. RFCA 83.13%, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95–1.39, p = 0.14). The CBA was associated with a high risk of procedure-related complications (CBA 9.02% vs. RFCA 6.56%, OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05–2.31, p = 0.03), especially phrenic nerve paralysis (PNP, OR = 10.72, 95% CI: 5.59–20.55, p < 0.00001). The risk of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade was low in the CBA group (CBA 1.05% vs. RFCA 1.86%, OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

For AF, CBA was as effective as RFCA. However, CBA had a shorter procedure time and a non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time, a significantly high risk of PNP and a low incidence of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade compared with RFCA.

Cryoballoon vs. open irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term FreezeAF outcomes

Background

Effective treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for reducing the risk of stroke and heart failure. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has been developed as an alternative to the use of radiofrequency (RF) energy for electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. Herein, we provide long-term data regarding the efficacy of CB ablation in comparison to RF.

Methods

FreezeAF was a randomised non-inferiority study comparing CB ablation with RF ablation for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Procedural success for the long-term follow-up (30 months) was defined as freedom from AF with an absence of persistent complications.

Results

Of the 315 patients that were randomised and received catheter ablation, 292 (92.7%) completed the 30-month follow-up (147 in the RF group and 145 in the CB group). The baseline characteristics of the RF and CB groups were similar. Single-procedure success was achieved by 40% of patients in the RF group and 42% of the CB group (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). When including re-do procedures in the analysis, the multiple procedure success rate was 72% in the RF group and 76% in the CB group.

Conclusion

The data provide long-term evidence that CB ablation is non-inferior to RF ablation, with high proportions of patients reporting freedom from AF 30 months after the index procedure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00774566; first registered October 16, 2008; first patient included October 20, 2008.

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials

Introduction: We aimed to study the procedural characteristics, efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to clinical trials comparing CBA and RFA for AF. Outcomes were evaluated for efficacy, procedure characteristics and safety. For each study, odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for endpoints for both approaches. Results: We analyzed a total of 9,957 participants (3,369 in the CBA and 6,588 in RFA group) enrolled in 16 clinical trials. No significant difference was observed between CBA and RFA with regards to freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12-months, recurrent atrial arrhythmias or repeat catheter ablation. CBA group had a significantly higher transient phrenic nerve injury (OR 14.19, 95% CI: 6.92-29.10; p<0.001) and persistent phrenic nerve injury (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.97-10.81; p<0.001); and a significantly lower pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.72; p=0.001), and groin site complications (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.93; p=0.02). No significant difference was observed in overall complications, stroke/thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. Conclusion: CBA was non-inferior to RFA for catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. RF ablation was associated with a higher groin complications and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, whereas CBA was associated with higher rates of transient and persistent phrenic nerve injury.

Conventional versus 3-D Echocardiography to Predict Arrhythmia Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains high and requires repeat interventions in a substantial number of patients. We assessed the value of conventional and 3-D echocardiography to predict AF recurrence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation by means of pulmonary vein isolation were included in a prospective registry. Echocardiograms were obtained prior to the ablation procedure, and analyzed offline in a standardized manner, including 3-D left atrial (LA) volumetry and determination of LA function and sphericity. The primary endpoint, AF recurrence (>30 seconds) between 3 to 12 months after AF ablation, was independently adjudicated. We included 276 patients (73% male, mean age 59.9 ± 9.9 years). Paroxysmal and persistent AF were present in 178 (64%) and 98 (36%) patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and indexed LA volume in 3-D (LAVI) were 52 ± 12% and 42 ± 13 mL/m² , respectively. AF recurrence was observed in 110 (40%) patients after a single procedure. Median (interquartile range) time to AF recurrence was 123 (92; 236) days. In multivariable Cox regression models, the only predictors for AF recurrence were the minimal, maximal, and indexed 3-D LA volumes, P = 0.024, P = 0.016, and P = 0.014, respectively. Quartile specific analysis of 3-D LAVI showed an HR of 1.885 (95%CI 1.066-3.334; P for trend = 0.015) for the highest compared to the lowest quartile.

CONCLUSION

Our results show the important role of LA volume for the long-term freedom from arrhythmia after AF ablation. These data also highlight the potential of 3-D echocardiography in this context and may facilitate patient selection for AF ablation.

Loop Recorder Detected High Rate of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after a Single Balloon- or Basket-Based Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the MACPAF Study

Purpose

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established approach to treat symptomatic non-permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Detecting AF recurrence after PVI is important, if discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after ablation is considered.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were enrolled in the prospective randomized mesh ablator vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein (PV) ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal AF study, comparing efficacy and safety of the HD Mesh Ablator^® (C.R. Bard, Lowell, MA, USA) and the Arctic Front^® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) catheter. Rhythm status post-PVI was closely monitored for 1 year using the implantable loop recorder (ILR) Reveal XT^® (Medtronic Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Results

The study was terminated after the first interim analysis due to the inability of the HD Mesh Ablator^® to achieve the predefined primary study endpoint, an exit block of all PVs. After a 90-day blanking period, 23 (62.2%) out of 37 study patients (median 63.0 years; 41% females) had at least one episode of AF. AF recurrence was associated with AF episodes during the blanking period {hazard ratios (HR) 5.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–21.4]; p = 0.038}, and a common left-sided PV ostium [HR 4.17 (95%CI 1.48–11.8); p = 0.039] but not with catheter type, age, gender, cardiovascular risk profile, or left atrial volume. There was a trend toward AF recurrence in patients without complete PVI of all PV (p = 0.095). Overall, 337 (59.4%) out of 566 ILR-detected episodes represented AF. Comparing patients with AF recurrence to those without, there was no difference in cognitive performance 6 months post-ablation.

Conclusion

Using an ILR, in more than 60% of all patients with paroxysmal AF, a recurrence of AF was detected within 12 months after ablation. In patients with a common PV ostium, the first generation balloon-based catheter is obviously less effective.

Clinical trials

http://Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01061931.

Repeat ablation and hospitalization following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation at a single tertiary medical center

Cryoablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has rapidly become a mainstream treatment for AF. In this report, 163 patients who had undergone a cryoablation procedure at one clinical center were contacted by telephone 33.1 ± 3.3 months after the procedure. All patients had received cryoablation of the pulmonary vein ostia, although concomitant procedures were performed at the same time in over 50% of the patients, including radiofrequency and/or cryoablation of other areas of the left atrium. Freedom from a repeat ablation procedure was 87%, while freedom from recurrent hospitalization for AF was 89%, as compared to previous reports of 65%. Of the 13 patients who had a repeat ablation procedure, only one was found to have a reconnection of pulmonary veins, while 4 were found to have atrial flutter. Cryoablation for AF produces a durable result in most patients out to 3 years with better outcomes than previously reported.

Impact of Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation on the Progression of Tricuspid Regurgitation and Right-Sided Heart Remodeling After Mitral-Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the role of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in decreasing tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right-sided heart remodeling in patients after mitral valve procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2014, 1568 consecutive patients with AF undergoing mitral valve procedure were identified. In 26.0% (n=408), surgical ablation of AF was used. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed on the basis of 41 known perioperative risk variables. Survival, reoperation, stroke, and moderate-to-severe TR, as well as echocardiography indices in long-term follow-up, were compared in 406 matched patient pairs (ablated and nonablated groups). The nonablated group showed significantly higher risks of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.644; 95% CI, 1.081-2.501; P=0.020), reoperation (HR, 2.644; 95% CI, 1.299-5.466; P=0.008), and moderate-to-severe TR (HR, 1.436; 95% CI, 1.059-1.948; P=0.020), associated with a significantly deteriorated cardiac function, progression of TR, and right-sided heart remodeling after 5-year follow-up. In a subgroup comparison of ablated patients with sinus rhythm versus AF recurrence, a PSM analysis was performed at the 5-year follow-up. The recurrent group showed significantly higher risks of moderate-to-severe TR (HR, 2.427; 95% CI, 1.261-4.671; P=0.008). AF recurrence was associated with progressive TR and significant deterioration in right-sided heart remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective PSM analysis, mitral valve disease with AF was associated with TR progression as well as right-sided heart remodeling, which are alleviated by surgical ablation.

Strain echocardiographic assessment of left atrial function predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation

AIMS

We evaluated if a dispersed left atrial (LA) contraction pattern was related to atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function, and normal or mildly enlarged left atrium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 61 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). Of these, 30 had not while 31 had recurrence of AF after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Twenty healthy individuals were included for comparison. Echocardiography was performed in patients in sinus rhythm the day before RFA. LA volume was calculated. Peak negative longitudinal strain was assessed in 18 LA segments during atrial systole. Contraction duration in 18 LA segments was measured as the time from peak of the P wave on electrocardiogram to maximum myocardial shortening in each segment. The standard deviation of contraction durations was defined as LA mechanical dispersion (LA MD). LA size was rather preserved in patients with PAF (LA volume 25 ± 10 mL/m(2)). LA MD was more pronounced in patients with recurrence of AF after RFA compared with those without recurrence and controls (38 ± 14 ms vs. 30 ± 12 ms vs. 16 ± 8 ms, both P < 0.001). LA MD was a predictor of PAF [OR 7.84 (95%CI 2.15-28.7), P < 0.01, per 10 ms increase] adjusted for age, LA volume, e', and LA function. LA function by strain was reduced in both patients with and without recurrent AF after RFA compared with controls (-14 ± 4% vs. -16 ± 3% vs. -19 ± 2%, both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LA MD was pronounced, and LA deformation was reduced in patients with PAF with apparently normal LV structure and function, and normal or mildly enlarged LA. LA MD may be useful as a predictor of AF recurrence after RFA.

Long Term Follow-up of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Cryoballoon Ablation

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is an established catheter-based approach to treating atrial fibrillation (AF). There is little data regarding the long-term efficacy of this approach.

METHODS

We enrolled 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic AF who had failed therapy with at least one anti-arrhythmic medication and followed them for five years. The primary efficacy endpoint was symptomatic recurrence of AF after a single cryoballoon ablation procedure.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients formed the study group. Median follow-up was 56 months. Following a single procedure, 46.7% of patients with paroxysmal AF remained free of symptomatic recurrence of AF compared to 35.6% of patients with persistent AF. When allowing for repeat ablations, at the end of the follow-up period 53.3% of patients in the paroxysmal group remained free of symptomatic AF compared to 47.5% in the persistent group. The rate of complications was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoballoon ablation is an effective catheter-based approach for treating symptomatic AF with a low risk of complications.

Very Long-Term Results Of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Confirm That This Therapy Is Really Effective

Catheter ablation -in general- is a highly effective and "curative" intervention for a broad spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. After a successful procedure eliminating a simple arrhythmia substrate, the recurrence rate is low and the short term success correlates well with the long term freedom from the arrhythmia.

Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority FreezeAF Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

There is a lack of data on the comparative efficacy and procedural safety of open irrigated radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon catheter (CB) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.