1
|
Lampert R, Chung EH, Ackerman MJ, Arroyo AR, Darden D, Deo R, Dolan J, Etheridge SP, Gray BR, Harmon KG, James CA, Kim JH, Krahn AD, La Gerche A, Link MS, MacIntyre C, Mont L, Salerno JC, Shah MJ. 2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e151-e252. [PMID: 38763377 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Lampert
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Eugene H Chung
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Rajat Deo
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joe Dolan
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Belinda R Gray
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Andrew D Krahn
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andre La Gerche
- Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark S Link
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Lluis Mont
- Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jack C Salerno
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maully J Shah
- Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song ZQ, Lu XY, Xu YP, Lin H, Chen YH. The role of left atrium posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol 2024:S0914-5087(24)00180-1. [PMID: 39341373 DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
The posterior left atrium (LAPW) is an important substrate for initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). While it has been proposed as a potential target for preventing recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias, it remains unclear whether electrical silence of LAPW offers additional benefits over pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and identified 21 eligible studies, encompassing 1514 patients assigned to PVI + posterior wall isolation (PWI) group and 1629 patients assigned to PVI group. Over a median follow-up of 12 months, adjunctive PWI significantly improved the atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival by 14 % in comparison to PVI alone [relative risk (RR): 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.04 to 1.25, p = 0.004]. This improvement was mainly attributed to a pronounced benefit for patients with persistent AF. In addition, patients undergoing PVI + PWI had a longer procedure time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 23.85, 95 % CI: 12.68 to 35.01, p < 0.001], ablation time (WMD: 9.27, 95 % CI: 5.19 to 13.54, p < 0.001), and a nearly negligible increase in fluoroscopic exposure (WMD: 2.69, 95 % CI: -0.23 to 5.62, p = 0.071). There was no increased risk of procedure-related complications between these approaches (RR: 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.71 to 1.57, p = 0.787). Compared with PVI alone, PWI adjunctive to PVI exhibited a higher procedure success of sinus rhythm maintenance in persistent AF during an index catheter ablation. Meanwhile, elongated procedure time and ablation time did not compromise the safety of extensive ablation strategy with additional PWI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng-Qi Song
- The First Clinical Medical College, Wenzhou Medical University, Chashan, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xin-Yu Lu
- The First Clinical Medical College, Wenzhou Medical University, Chashan, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yu-Peng Xu
- The First Clinical Medical College, Wenzhou Medical University, Chashan, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Longwan, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yi-He Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e31-e149. [PMID: 38597857 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece.
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Badertscher P, Mannhart D, Weidlich S, Krisai P, Voellmin G, Osswald S, Knecht S, Sticherling C, Kühne M. Left atrial posterior wall isolation using pulsed-field ablation: procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:1359-1364. [PMID: 38182965 PMCID: PMC11379758 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01728-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-pulmonary vein (PV) ablation targets such as posterior wall isolation (PWI) have been tested in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers a novel ablation technology possibly able to overcome the obstacles of incomplete PWI and concerns of damage to adjacent structures compared to thermal energy sources. Our aim was to assess procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing PWI using PFA in a clinical setting. METHODS Patients undergoing PFA-PVI with PWI were included. First-pass isolation was controlled using a multipolar mapping catheter. RESULTS One hundred consecutive patients were included (median age 69 [IQR 63-75] years, 33 females (33%), left atrial size 43 [IQR 39-47] mm, paroxysmal AF 24%). Median procedure time was 66 (IQR 59-77) min, and fluoroscopy time was 11 (8-14) min. PWI using PFA was achieved in 100% of patients with a median of 19 applications (IQR 14-26). There were no major complications. Overall, in 15 patients (15%), recurrent AF/AT was noted during a median follow-up of 144 (94-279) days. CONCLUSIONS PWI using PFA appears safe and results in high acute isolation rates and high arrhythmia survival during mid-term follow-up. Further randomized trials are essential and warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Badertscher
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Diego Mannhart
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Simon Weidlich
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Krisai
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gian Voellmin
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Osswald
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sven Knecht
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Sticherling
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Kühne
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Y, Xi Y, Zhang W, Hao J. The Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial BOX Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:316. [PMID: 39355587 PMCID: PMC11440413 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2509316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) has a high recurrence rate in managing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). While some studies suggest that augmenting CPVI with additional left atrial BOX ablation can diminish this recurrence rate among patients with persistent AF, this approach remains controversial. This meta-analysis assesses the safety and efficacy of adjunctive left atrial BOX ablation in treating persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search across China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, focusing on randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of any atrial arrhythmias (AAs) within one-year post-treatment, with the secondary outcome being the frequency of adverse events related to the surgery. Results The combination of CPVI and left atrial BOX ablation did not lead to a significant reduction in the overall recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias (risk ratios (RR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73-1.02, I2 = 35%). However, subgroup analyses revealed that this therapeutic approach significantly decreased the recurrence rates of all atrial arrhythmias (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.49-0.92, I2 = 15%) and specifically atrial fibrillation (RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.37-0.77, I2 = 0%) in patients with a left atrial diameter ≤44 mm. Notably, there was no significant increase in the incidence of procedure-related adverse events (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.56-1.94, I2 = 0%). However, the durations of both the ablation (mean difference (MD) = 19.77, 95% CI = 15.84-23.70, I2 = 0%) and the overall procedure (MD = 15.64, 95% CI = 6.99-24.29, I2 = 0%) were longer due to the additional ablation steps. Conclusions In patients with smaller left atrial diameters, augmenting CPVI with left atrial BOX ablation significantly lowers the recurrence rates of atrial arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation without elevating surgical risk levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Yin Xi
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Wenyu Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Jie Hao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050000 Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baqal O, Shafqat A, Kulthamrongsri N, Sanghavi N, Iyengar SK, Vemulapalli HS, El Masry HZ. Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Pulmonary Veins. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5031. [PMID: 39274244 PMCID: PMC11396655 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in ablative therapies, outcomes remain less favorable for persistent atrial fibrillation often due to presence of non-pulmonary vein triggers and abnormal atrial substrates. This review highlights advances in ablation technologies and notable scientific literature on clinical outcomes associated with pursuing adjunctive ablation targets and substrate modification during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, while also highlighting notable future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Baqal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Areez Shafqat
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Neysa Sanghavi
- St. George's University School of Medicine, West Indies P.O. Box 7, Grenada
| | - Shruti K Iyengar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hema S Vemulapalli
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hicham Z El Masry
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:921-1072. [PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory F Michaud
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ibrahim AA, Elaraby A, Almaadawy O, Abuelazm M, Hassan AR, Bakr A, Husain MA, Elsayed H, Abdelazeem B. Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation for atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:1108-1123. [PMID: 38967398 DOI: 10.1111/pace.15035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) plus traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been proposed as a promising intervention to decrease atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding PWI to the traditional PVI in patients with AF. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Cochrane through June 14, 2023. We used Stata version 17 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023446227). RESULTS We included 11 RCTs with a total number of 1534 patients. Combined ablation with PWI + PVI was not associated with any significant difference over PVI only regarding the recurrence of clinical AF (RR: 0.86 with 95% CI [0.70-1.06]), all atrial arrhythmia (RR: 0.93 with 95% CI [0.82-1.07]), nonatrial fibrillation arrhythmia (RR: 1.22 with 95% CI [0.97-1.53]), early AF (RR: 0.89 with 95% CI [0.62-1.27]), and antiarrhythmic drugs at discharge (RR: 0.83 with 95% CI [0.67-1.04]). However, it was associated with increased total ablation duration (minutes) (MD: 12.58 with 95% CI [6.80-18.37]) and total procedure duration (minutes) (MD: 16.77 with 95% CI [9.63-23.91]), without any significant difference regarding adverse events (RR: 1.05 with 95% CI [0.63-1.74]). CONCLUSION While the pooled data from PWI + PVI using point-by-point radiofrequency did not suggest a benefit in the recurrence of various atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone, PWI+PVI using direct posterior wall ablation, especially with cryoballoon, demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrence of AF/atrial arrhythmias. Also, PWI + PVI significantly increased the ablation and total procedure durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmed Elaraby
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Omar Almaadawy
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Ali Bakr
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | | | - Basel Abdelazeem
- Department of Cardiology, West Virginia University, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lim MW, Morton M, Fernando R, Elbracht-Leong S, Better N, Segan L, William J, Crowley R, Morton JB, Sparks PB, Lee G, McLellan AJ, Ling LH, Sugumar H, Prabhu S, Voskoboinik A, Kalman JM, Kistler PM. Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation During AF Ablation on the Incidence of Left Atrial Flutter. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 10:1620-1630. [PMID: 38752960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linear and complex electrogram ablation (LCEA) beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increase in left atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardias (LAMTs). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly performed to improve AF ablation outcomes. However, the impact of PWI on the incidence of LAMT is unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence of LAMT following PVI alone vs PVI + PWI vs PVI + PWI + LCEA. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF or LAMT post-AF ablation between 2008 and 2022 from 4 electrophysiology centers were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS In total, 5,619 (4,419 index, 1,100 redo) AF ablation procedures were performed in 4,783 patients (mean age 60.9 ± 10.6 years, 70.7% men). Over a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 3.8 years, 246 procedures for LAMT were performed in 214 patients at a mean of 2.6 ± 0.6 years post-AF ablation. Perimitral (52.8% of patients), roof-dependent (27.1%), PV gap-related (17.3%), and anterior circuits (8.9%) were most common, with 16.4% demonstrating multiple circuits. The incidence of LAMT was significantly higher following PVI + PWI (6.2%) vs PVI alone (3.0%; P < 0.0001) and following PVI + PWI + LCEA vs PVI + PWI (12.5%; P = 0.019). Conduction gaps in previous ablation lines were responsible for LAMT in 28.4% post-PVI alone, 35.3% post-PVI + PWI (P = 0.386), and 81.8% post-PVI + PWI + LCEA (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of LAMT following PVI + PWI is higher than with PVI alone but significantly lower than with more extensive atrial substrate modification. Given a low frequency of LAMT following PWI, empiric mitral isthmus ablation is not justified and may be proarrhythmic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Lim
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Nathan Better
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Segan
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeremy William
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rose Crowley
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph B Morton
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B Sparks
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Lee
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex J McLellan
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liang-Han Ling
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hariharan Sugumar
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandeep Prabhu
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aleksandr Voskoboinik
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan M Kalman
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter M Kistler
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dasí A, Nagel C, Pope MTB, Wijesurendra RS, Betts TR, Sachetto R, Loewe A, Bueno-Orovio A, Rodriguez B. In Silico TRials guide optimal stratification of ATrIal FIbrillation patients to Catheter Ablation and pharmacological medicaTION: the i-STRATIFICATION study. Europace 2024; 26:euae150. [PMID: 38870348 PMCID: PMC11184207 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) experience 50% recurrence despite pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and no consensus is established for secondary treatments. The aim of our i-STRATIFICATION study is to provide evidence for stratifying patients with AF recurrence after PVI to optimal pharmacological and ablation therapies, through in silico trials. METHODS AND RESULTS A cohort of 800 virtual patients, with variability in atrial anatomy, electrophysiology, and tissue structure (low-voltage areas, LVAs), was developed and validated against clinical data from ionic currents to electrocardiogram. Virtual patients presenting AF post-PVI underwent 12 secondary treatments. Sustained AF developed in 522 virtual patients after PVI. Second ablation procedures involving left atrial ablation alone showed 55% efficacy, only succeeding in the small right atria (<60 mL). When additional cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation was considered, Marshall-PLAN sufficed (66% efficacy) for the small left atria (<90 mL). For the bigger left atria, a more aggressive ablation approach was required, such as anterior mitral line (75% efficacy) or posterior wall isolation plus mitral isthmus ablation (77% efficacy). Virtual patients with LVAs greatly benefited from LVA ablation in the left and right atria (100% efficacy). Conversely, in the absence of LVAs, synergistic ablation and pharmacotherapy could terminate AF. In the absence of ablation, the patient's ionic current substrate modulated the response to antiarrhythmic drugs, being the inward currents critical for optimal stratification to amiodarone or vernakalant. CONCLUSION In silico trials identify optimal strategies for AF treatment based on virtual patient characteristics, evidencing the power of human modelling and simulation as a clinical assisting tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Dasí
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK
| | - Claudia Nagel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Michael T B Pope
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department for Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rohan S Wijesurendra
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy R Betts
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rafael Sachetto
- Departamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei, São João del Rei, MG, Brazil
| | - Axel Loewe
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Alfonso Bueno-Orovio
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK
| | - Blanca Rodriguez
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Turagam MK, Neuzil P, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A, Hansen J, Blaauw Y, Maury P, Arentz T, Sommer P, Anic A, Anselme F, Boveda S, Deneke T, Willems S, van der Voort P, Tilz R, Funasako M, Scherr D, Wakili R, Steven D, Kautzner J, Vijgen J, Jais P, Petru J, Chun J, Roten L, Füting A, Lemoine MD, Ruwald M, Mulder BA, Rollin A, Lehrmann H, Fink T, Jurisic Z, Chaumont C, Adelino R, Nentwich K, Gunawardene M, Ouss A, Heeger CH, Manninger M, Bohnen JE, Sultan A, Peichl P, Koopman P, Derval N, Kueffer T, Reinsch N, Reddy VY. Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 10:900-912. [PMID: 38430087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury. OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA). METHODS In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events. RESULTS Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit K Turagam
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Petr Neuzil
- Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Boris Schmidt
- MVZ CCB Frankfurt und Main-Taunus GbR, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tobias Reichlin
- Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kars Neven
- Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Metzner
- University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jim Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Yuri Blaauw
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Philippe Maury
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France; I2MC, INSERM UMR 1297, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Arentz
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Sommer
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Ante Anic
- Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia
| | | | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universitair Ziekenhuis VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom Deneke
- Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Rhoen-Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
| | | | | | - Roland Tilz
- University Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Moritoshi Funasako
- Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Neuron Medical, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel Scherr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Reza Wakili
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Steven
- Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne, Department for Electrophysiology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Josef Kautzner
- IKEM-Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Johan Vijgen
- Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospitals, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Pierre Jais
- IHU LIRYC, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Jan Petru
- Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Julian Chun
- MVZ CCB Frankfurt und Main-Taunus GbR, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Laurent Roten
- Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anna Füting
- Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Marc D Lemoine
- University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Ruwald
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Bart A Mulder
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Rollin
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Heiko Lehrmann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Fink
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Zrinka Jurisic
- Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia
| | | | - Raquel Adelino
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universitair Ziekenhuis VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karin Nentwich
- Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Rhoen-Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian-Hendrik Heeger
- University Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Martin Manninger
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jan-Eric Bohnen
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Arian Sultan
- Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne, Department for Electrophysiology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Petr Peichl
- IKEM-Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pieter Koopman
- Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospitals, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Thomas Kueffer
- Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nico Reinsch
- Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024; 26:euae043. [PMID: 38587017 PMCID: PMC11000153 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shigeta T, Miyazaki S, Inaba O, Inamura Y, Nitta J, Sekiguchi Y, Takahashi A, Hachiya H, Nagata Y, Yamauchi Y, Hayashi T, Iwai S, Mizukami A, Ono Y, Handa K, Suzuki M, Suzuki A, Nakajima J, Hirao K, Okada H, Negishi M, Ikenouchi T, Yamamoto T, Goto K, Nishimura T, Tao S, Takigawa M, Hirakawa A, Goya M, Sasano T. Adjunctive posterior wall isolation for the treatment of persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (CORNERSTONE AF) trial: Design and rationale. Clin Cardiol 2024; 47:e24164. [PMID: 37822107 PMCID: PMC10766127 DOI: 10.1002/clc.24164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) is one of the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategies. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that an additional empirical LAPWI would increase the freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias as compared to standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients. METHODS The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study investigating patients with AF persisting for >7 days and <3 years undergoing first-time AF ablation. They will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI + LAPWI in a 1:1 manner. Although PVI can be performed with either radiofrequency catheters or cryoballoons, only radiofrequency catheters will be permitted to achieve LAPWIs. Additional focal ablation targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers will be allowed. A total of 516 patients will be enrolled in 17 centers between August 2022 and February 2024 based on the calculation with 80% power, considering the assumption that 65% and 75% of the PVI and PVI + LAPWI group patients will be free from atrial arrhythmia recurrence 18-months postprocedure (10% of dropout). The primary endpoint is freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias 18 months postsingle procedures. Clinical follow-up will include 7-day ambulatory electrocardiograms and routine outpatient consultations by electrophysiologists at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postprocedure. RESULTS As of August 2023, a total of 331 patients (68 ± 9 years, 270 men, 43 longstanding persistent AF) have been enrolled. CONCLUSIONS The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an adjunctive empirical LAPWI following standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takatoshi Shigeta
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Shinsuke Miyazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Osamu Inaba
- Department of CardiologyJapanese Red Cross Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Yukihiro Inamura
- Department of CardiologyJapanese Red Cross Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Junichi Nitta
- Department of CardiologySakakibara Heart InstituteTokyoJapan
| | - Yukio Sekiguchi
- Department of CardiologySakakibara Heart InstituteTokyoJapan
| | | | | | - Yasutoshi Nagata
- Department of CardiologyJapanese Red Cross Musashino HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuteru Yamauchi
- Department of CardiologyJapanese Red Cross Yokohama City Bay HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | - Tatsuya Hayashi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical CenterJichi Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| | - Shinsuke Iwai
- Department of CardiologyHiratsuka Kyosai HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | | | - Yuichi Ono
- Department of CardiologyOme Municipal General HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Keita Handa
- Division of CardiologyKashiwa City HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Makoto Suzuki
- Department of CardiologyYokohama Minami Kyosai HospitalYokohamaJapan
| | | | - Jun Nakajima
- Department of CardiologyTokyo Metropolitan Toshima HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Kenzo Hirao
- Arrhythmia Advanced Therapy CenterAOI Universal HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of CardiologySoka Municipal HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Miho Negishi
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Takashi Ikenouchi
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Tasuku Yamamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Kentaro Goto
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Takuro Nishimura
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Susumu Tao
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Masateru Takigawa
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Akihiro Hirakawa
- Department of Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiko Goya
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Tetsuo Sasano
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kueffer T, Tanner H, Madaffari A, Seiler J, Haeberlin A, Maurhofer J, Noti F, Herrera C, Thalmann G, Kozhuharov NA, Reichlin T, Roten L. Posterior wall ablation by pulsed-field ablation: procedural safety, efficacy, and findings on redo procedures. Europace 2023; 26:euae006. [PMID: 38225174 PMCID: PMC10803044 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS The left atrial posterior wall is a potential ablation target in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation despite durable pulmonary vein isolation or in patients with roof-dependent atrial tachycardia (AT). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers efficient and safe posterior wall ablation (PWA), but available data are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS Consecutive patients undergoing PWA using PFA were included. Posterior wall ablation was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter and verified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping. Follow-up was performed using 7-day Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 s was defined as failure. Lesion durability was assessed during redo procedures. Posterior wall ablation was performed in 215 patients (70% males, median age 70 [IQR 61-75] years, 67% redo procedures) and was successful in all patients (100%) by applying a median of 36 (IQR 32-44) PFA lesions. Severe adverse events were cardiac tamponade and vascular access complication in one patient each (0.9%). Median follow-up was 7.3 (IQR 5.0-11.8) months. One-year arrhythmia-free outcome in Kaplan-Meier analysis was 53%. A redo procedure was performed in 26 patients (12%) after a median of 6.9 (IQR 2.4-11) months and showed durable PWA in 22 patients (85%) with only minor lesion regression. Among four patients with posterior wall reconnection, three (75%) presented with roof-dependent AT. CONCLUSION Posterior wall ablation with this pentaspline PFA catheter can be safely and efficiently performed with a high durability observed during redo procedures. The added value of durable PWA for the treatment of atrial fibrillation remains to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kueffer
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hildegard Tanner
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Madaffari
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jens Seiler
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Haeberlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jens Maurhofer
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Noti
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Herrera
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gregor Thalmann
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nikola A Kozhuharov
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Roten
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sakai S, Takitsume A, Soeda T, Kawata H, Nishida T, Watanabe M. Differences in the feasibility, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and isolation area of a left atrial posterior wall isolation using radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheters. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:1393-1402. [PMID: 37708321 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS The difficulty and outcome of the adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) may be affected by the ablation energy used. This study aimed to compare the completion rate, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and the isolation area of a LAPWI between the use of radiofrequency (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA). METHODS We enrolled 95 and 93 patients with PersAF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)+LAPWI using RFA (RF group) and CBA (CB group), respectively. Preoperative computed tomography was used to evaluate the anatomical features associated with an incomplete LAPWI. Post-ablation 3-dimensional maps were analyzed to quantify the isolation area. RESULTS The completion rate of the LAPWI was significantly higher in the RF group than the CB group without touch-up RFA (88.4% vs. 72.0%; p = .005). Predictors of incomplete LAPWI were a longer left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV)-esophageal distance (p < .001) for RFA and a steeper angle of the LAPW (p < .001) and longer transverse LAPW diameter (p = .016) for CBA. The isolated non-PV area with RFA or CBA alone was significantly greater in the CB group than the RF group (27.5 ± 9.5 cm2 vs. 22.9 ± 6.9 cm2 ; p < .001). CONCLUSION The position of the esophagus at a distance from the LIPV was associated with an incomplete LAPWI using RFA, while a steeper angle of the LAPW and transverse enlargement of the LAPW were associated with that using CBA. The completion rate of the LAPWI was higher with RFA, but the isolation area outside of the PVs was greater with CBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Sakai
- Department of Cardiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Akihiro Takitsume
- Department of Cardiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Tsunenari Soeda
- Department of Cardiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kawata
- Department of Cardiology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Taku Nishida
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Makoto Watanabe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ioannidis P, Katsaras D, Zografos T, Charalambopoulos P, Kouvelas K, Tsitsinakis G, Raitsos-Exarchopoulos I, Kappou T, Zagoraios A, Ganas P, Vassilopoulos A, Xylakis E, Christoforatou E. Box Lesion Isolation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall with Radiofrequency Ablation Restricted in Predetermined Lines for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Prognostic Role of Acute Interventional Outcome and Trigger Identification. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2023; 14:5642-5653. [PMID: 38058389 PMCID: PMC10697114 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2023.14115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The left atrial posterior wall (PW) is known to be a critical substrate for the initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been explored as a target for catheter ablation, particularly in persistent AF (PerAF). In this retrospective study, we investigate the clinical outcome of patients with PerAF who underwent PW isolation (PWI) restricted in predetermined lines in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). One hundred consecutive patients (64 ± 9.1 years, 66% male, 20% with previous PVI ablation) underwent PWI in a box lesion setting for PerAF lasting >3 months (34% long-standing PerAF). PW triggers were defined as either foci from the PW that repeatedly induced AF or as isolated AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) within the PW. After a mean follow-up period of 25.6 ± 6.7 months, 61% of the patients remained in sinus rhythm after the last procedure. In 79 patients, the PW was successfully isolated, while, in 21 patients, complete isolation was not possible due to failure in completion of the roof line (n = 16), the floor line (n = 7), or both (n = 2). Patients with incomplete isolation had similar AF/AT recurrence rates compared to those with complete PWI. In 12 patients, PW triggers were identified, and PWI in these patients was shown to have a significantly better prognosis in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance (P = .031). Failure of complete PWI does not predispose a patient to an inferior outcome nor is it responsible for iatrogenic ATs. The presence of AF triggers within the PW leads to a particularly favorable result after box lesion isolation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Calvert P, Lip GYH, Gupta D. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A review of techniques. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2023; 33:405-415. [PMID: 35421538 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a key area of current research. A multitude of techniques have been tested, some of which are poorly evidenced and not recommended in routine clinical practice whilst others are more promising. Additionally, a plethora of issues exist when researching ablation techniques, from control arm ablation strategy to the relevance of outcome measures. In this review article, we discuss these issues in the context of the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Calvert
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Dhiraj Gupta
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shrestha DB, Pathak BD, Thapa N, Shrestha O, Karki S, Shtembari J, Patel NK, Kapoor K, Kalahasty G, Bodziock G, Whalen P, Pothineni NVK, Narasimhan B, Koneru J, Shantha G. Catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation with versus without left atrial posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2023:10.1007/s10840-023-01656-z. [PMID: 37773559 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01656-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the results are suboptimal for persistent AF. The left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is thought to be a major additional area in initiation and perpetuation of persistent AF. Therefore, adjunctive ablation of the posterior wall may reduce AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF using PVI alone versus a combination of PVI and LAPW isolation. METHODS Literature search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Embase since inception to February 2023. Screening of studies was done via Covidence software. Risk of bias assessment was done using appropriate tools. Data extraction and a narrative synthesis were carried out accordingly. RESULTS Ten studies were included, of which five were randomized controlled trials. PVI with LAPW ablation group had significantly lower recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR 0.47, CI 0.32-0.70) and AF (OR 0.39, CI 0.23-0.69). In sensitivity analysis, freedom from atrial arrhythmias was noted to be significantly higher in the PVI with LAPW ablation group (OR 2.22, CI 1.36-3.64). However, there was no significant difference in occurrence of atrial flutter (OR 1.36, CI 0.86-2.14) or with periprocedural adverse events (OR 1.10, CI 0.60-1.99). CONCLUSION LAPW ablation, in addition to PVI, significantly improves the rates of arrhythmia freedom and reduces the recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia. There was no significant difference in atrial flutter or periprocedural adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bishnu Deep Pathak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jibjibe Primary Health Care Center, Rasuwa, Nepal
| | - Niranjan Thapa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Oshan Shrestha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sagun Karki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Jurgen Shtembari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nimesh K Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kunal Kapoor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Gautham Kalahasty
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Electrophysiology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - George Bodziock
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Patrick Whalen
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Bharat Narasimhan
- Department of Cardiology, Debakey Cardiovascular Institute, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jayanthi Koneru
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Electrophysiology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ghanshyam Shantha
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Singh S, Goel S, Chaudhary R, Garg A, Tantry US, Gurbel PA, Garg L. Safety and Effectiveness of Adjunctive Posterior Wall Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiol 2023; 203:64-72. [PMID: 37481814 PMCID: PMC10809755 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
As the atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence rate remains high after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) has been studied in randomized controlled trials, however, the results are conflicting. We performed an updated meta-analysis by searching online databases for the randomized controlled trials comparing the PWI + PVI group to the PVI alone group in patients with AF. The outcomes of interest were AF recurrence, all atrial arrhythmia recurrence, and atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random effects model. A total of 1,612 patients, with 807 in the PWI + PVI group and 805 in the PVI alone group were included. The mean age was 60 (9) years, 75% were men and 71% had persistent AF. The PWI + PVI group had lower AF recurrence as compared with the PVI alone group (25% vs 32%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in all atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.04, p = 0.16), atrial flutter/AT recurrence (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.55, p = 0.19) or adverse event rates in the 2 groups (36 vs 31; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.77, p = 0.73). In conclusion, adjunctive PWI in addition to PVI can be achieved with lower AF recurrence but with a nonsignificant increase in atrial flutter/AT recurrence, resulting in an overall similar rate of all atrial arrhythmia recurrence without increasing the risk of adverse events, when compared with PVI alone strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahib Singh
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Swecha Goel
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rahul Chaudhary
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aakash Garg
- Division of Cardiology, St. Peter's Health Partners, New York
| | - Udaya S Tantry
- Department of Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Paul A Gurbel
- Department of Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Cardiology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lohit Garg
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baqal O, El Masry HZ. Ablative Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) with Posterior Wall Isolation (PWI): Where Do We Stand? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:273. [PMID: 37504529 PMCID: PMC10380213 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10070273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is a diverse clinical entity, with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) being particularly challenging to manage. Through this paper, we discuss notable developments in our understanding of ablative strategies for managing PeAF, with a special focus on posterior wall isolation (PWI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Baqal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Hicham Z El Masry
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Darden D, Aldaas O, Du C, Munir MB, Feld GK, Pothineni NVK, Gopinathannair R, Lakkireddy D, Curtis JP, Freeman JV, Akar JG, Hsu JC. In-hospital complications associated with pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive lesions: the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry. Europace 2023; 25:euad124. [PMID: 37184436 PMCID: PMC10228609 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS No prior study has been adequately powered to evaluate real-world safety outcomes in those receiving adjunctive ablation lesions beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to evaluate characteristics and in-hospital complications among patients undergoing PVI with and without adjunctive lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between 2016 and 2020 were identified and stratified into paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF, and separated into PVI only, PVI + cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, and PVI + adjunctive (superior vena cava isolation, coronary sinus, vein of Marshall, atypical atrial flutter lines, other). Adjusted odds of adverse events were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 50 937 patients [PAF: 30 551 (60%), persistent AF: 20 386 (40%)] were included. Among those with PAF, there were no differences in the adjusted odds of complications between PVI + CTI or PVI + adjunctive when compared with PVI only. Among persistent AF, PVI + adjunctive was associated with a higher risk of any complication [3.0 vs. 4.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.58] and major complication (0.8 vs. 1.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-2.21), while no differences were observed in PVI + CTI compared with PVI only. Overall, there was high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion type, and those receiving adjunctive lesions had a higher comorbidity burden. CONCLUSION Additional CTI ablation was common without an increased risk of complications. Adjunctive lesions other than CTI are commonly performed in those with more comorbidities and were associated with an increased risk of complications in persistent AF, although the current analysis is limited by high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion set type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Darden
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, 5100 W 110th St, Suite 200, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Omar Aldaas
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Chengan Du
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Muhammad Bilal Munir
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Gregory K Feld
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | | | - Rakesh Gopinathannair
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, 5100 W 110th St, Suite 200, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, 5100 W 110th St, Suite 200, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Jeptha P Curtis
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James V Freeman
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph G Akar
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan C Hsu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Efficacy and Safety Ablation Index-Guided High-Energy Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PVI Plus Linear Ablation of Mitral Isthmus and Posterior Box Isolation. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020619. [PMID: 36675552 PMCID: PMC9862717 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (AI)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial (LA) posterior box isolation is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) combined with linear ablation of LA roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and MI compare with the PVI-alone method in patients of persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS 362 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers. A total of 200 cases were in PVI-plus group and 162 cases were in PVI-alone group. The PVI-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. PVI combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI)and MI were performed in the PVI-plus group. The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia. After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the PVI-plus group and 62.5% in the PVI-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012). The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in PVI-plus group and 1.9% in PVI-alone group (p = 0.808). CONCLUSION In this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (PVI plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent AF patients. Compared with the PVI-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kistler PM, Chieng D, Sugumar H, Ling LH, Segan L, Azzopardi S, Al-Kaisey A, Parameswaran R, Anderson RD, Hawson J, Prabhu S, Voskoboinik A, Wong G, Morton JB, Pathik B, McLellan AJ, Lee G, Wong M, Finch S, Pathak RK, Raja DC, Sterns L, Ginks M, Reid CM, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 329:127-135. [PMID: 36625809 PMCID: PMC9856612 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.23722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 134.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison. Objective To compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation. Design, Setting, and Participants Investigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022. Interventions The PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications. Results Among 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, -1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P < .001) and ablation times (34 [SD, 21] vs 28 [SD, 12] minutes, P < .001) were significantly shorter for PVI alone. There were 6 complications for PVI with PWI and 4 for PVI alone. Conclusions and Relevance In patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF. Trial Registration anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M. Kistler
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Chieng
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hariharan Sugumar
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liang-Han Ling
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Segan
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sonia Azzopardi
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ahmed Al-Kaisey
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Robert D. Anderson
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joshua Hawson
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandeep Prabhu
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Mulgrave Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aleksandr Voskoboinik
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Wong
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph B. Morton
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bhupesh Pathik
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex J. McLellan
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Lee
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Wong
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Hospital Richmond, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue Finch
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rajeev K. Pathak
- Canberra Hospital, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Deep Chandh Raja
- Canberra Hospital, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Laurence Sterns
- Royal Jubilee Hospital, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Jonathan M. Kalman
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Risk and benefit of extrapulmonary vein ablation in atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol 2023; 38:1-5. [PMID: 36598443 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000001002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize the recent development, benefit, and safety of extrapulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation. RECENT FINDING Studies have shown that extrapulmonary vein ablation can help maintain normal sinus rhythm for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. As prior strategies targeting anatomical lines and triggers are well utilized, novel techniques for substrate mapping have been rapidly developing. These strategies are well tolerated and could be chosen based on patients' conditions and physicians' experience. SUMMARY Extrapulmonary vein ablation could be safely and effectively performed for patients with atrial fibrillation. It provides further consolidation of normal sinus rhythm.
Collapse
|
25
|
Romero J, Polanco D, Gabr M, Alviz I, Diaz JC, Briceno D, Velasco A, Patel K, Natale A, Di Biase L. Posterior Wall Electrical Isolation in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal and Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022; 9:583-585. [PMID: 36752475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
26
|
Sohns C, Bergau L, El-Hamriti M, Fox H, Molatta S, Braun M, Khalaph M, Imnadze G, Sommer P. Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiol J 2022; 29:917-926. [PMID: 33346368 PMCID: PMC9788747 DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2020.0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Sohns
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Leonard Bergau
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Mustapha El-Hamriti
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Henrik Fox
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart Failure Department, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Stephan Molatta
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Martin Braun
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Moneeb Khalaph
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Guram Imnadze
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Philipp Sommer
- Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Solimene F, Schillaci V, Stabile G, Shopova G, Arestia A, Salito A, Maddaluno F, Malacrida M, Strisciuglio T. Prospective evaluation of local impedance drop to guide left atrial posterior wall ablation with high power. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022; 65:675-684. [PMID: 35906492 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01317-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local impedance (LI) drop predicts acute conduction block during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Whether the LI drop predicts also the achievement of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) patients is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and the safety of LI drop-guided LAPW ablation by using high power (50 watts) and investigated the impact of ablation parameters on the LI drop. METHODS We included consecutive PersAF patients underwent PVI and both roof line and floor line completion to achieve LAPWI with a novel contact force (CF)- and LI-featured catheter (IntellaNAV Stablepoint™). For each radiofrequency (RF) application, we targeted a LI drop of 25 ohms. RESULTS Out of 30 patients, first-pass floor line block was achieved in 26 (87%) and first-pass roof line block in 17 (57%), resulting in first-pass LAPWI in 14 patients (47%). After touch-up ablations, LAPWI was achieved in 28 patients (93%) with endocardial ablation only. No procedural nor 1-month complications occurred. Overall, 877 RF applications were delivered: 787 ablation tags (89%) were associated with acute conduction block, while 90 (11%) were located at sites of acute gaps in either the roof or floor line. LI drop values were greater at segments with acute block than those with gaps (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, only LI drop and RF time remained independently associated with the acute block (p < 0.001; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS LI drop-guided LAPWI at a fixed power of 50 W was effective and did not lead to complications. LI drop was the most important predictor of acute conduction block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giuseppe Stabile
- Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, Avellino, Italy.,Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Teresa Strisciuglio
- Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, Avellino, Italy.,University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu X, Gao X, Chen L, Shen L, Liu M, Xu Y. Clinical Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation in Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2022; 45:1268-1276. [PMID: 36073753 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remain unclear. Adjuvant posterior wall isolation (PWI) has become a potential supplementary strategy for improving the outcome of PerAF ablation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of PWI added to catheter ablation for PerAF. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing the outcomes of PerAF ablation with and without PWI. The efficacy outcomes were recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (AA), atrial fibrillation (AF), and atrial tachycardia (AT), and the safety outcome was adverse events. RESULTS In total, 8 studies with 1428 patients were included in the pooled analyses. The results showed that PWI significantly reduced the recurrence of AA (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55-0.87, p = 0.002, I2 = 63%) and AF (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40 - 0.80, p = 0.001, I2 = 70%). AT recurrence (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.67 - 1.27, p = 0.63, I2 = 42%) and adverse events (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.67-1.84, p = 0.70, I2 = 0%) were comparable between the two groups. In the sub-analyses, the efficacy of PWI in reducing AA recurrence was consistent in patients who underwent cryoablation or debulking ablation. CONCLUSION PWI effectively decreased AA recurrence after PerAF ablation without increasing the risk of AT or procedure-related complications. However, more randomized studies are needed to confirm these results. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohua Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiaofei Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lian Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lishui Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Meijun Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yizhou Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, #261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ranjan R, Kaba R, Chandrasekaran V, Momin A. The Convergent Ablation and AtriClip Exclusion of the Left Atrial Appendage in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CASE REPORTS 2022; 15:11795476221120778. [PMID: 36046371 PMCID: PMC9421220 DOI: 10.1177/11795476221120778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We here present a case of a 54-year-old man with longstanding persistent
atrial fibrillation refractory to direct current electrical
cardioversion who underwent a concurrent convergent ablation and
Atriclip exclusion of left atrial appendage. His preoperative
echocardiography revealed dilated 5.8 cm left atrium with a normal
left ventricular ejection fraction of 50%. Transmural isolation of
pulmonary veins was performed through a subxiphoid approach, and 3
left-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ports were utilised to
occlude the base of the left atrium appendage with the Atriclip
device. A peri-operative transoesophageal echocardiogram confirmed
left atrium appendage base occlusion, and the patient was in sinus
rhythm after having a single 200 kJ direct current cardioversion
shock. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was
discharged with preprocedural anticoagulant after 24 hours of the
procedure and advised to come for follow up after 3 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Redoy Ranjan
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.,St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Riyaz Kaba
- St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Aziz Momin
- St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moustafa A, Liu X, Elzanaty A, Meenakshisundaram C, Kancharla K, Kahaly O, Chacko P. Role of adjunctive cryoballoon left atrial posterior wall isolation in non- paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol 2022; 47:101383. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Miraglia V, Bisignani A, Pannone L, Iacopino S, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C. Cryoballoon Ablation Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the Setting of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:431-439. [PMID: 35786107 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2096437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Catheter ablation has been demonstrated to be a safe and an effective treatment for drug resistant atrial fibrillation (AF); electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the main strategy in paroxysmal AF, since pulmonary vein triggers have a pivotal role in its pathogenesis; non-paroxysmal AF is a complex arrhythmia that results from the interplay of a substrate, namely AF-induced electrical and structural atrial remodeling, and a trigger that can be often found outside pulmonary veins, namely non-pulmonary veins triggers. AREAS COVERED The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of non-pulmonary veins triggers with special focus on cryoballoon (CB) catheter ablation. EXPERT OPINION Besides PVI, CB catheter ablation of non-pulmonary veins triggers is a novel and promising strategy for non-paroxysmal AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Miraglia
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonio Bisignani
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Pannone
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Saverio Iacopino
- Electrophysiology Unit, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Gian-Battista Chierchia
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kanitsoraphan C, Rattanawong P, Techorueangwiwat C, Kewcharoen J, Mekritthikrai R, Prasitlumkum N, Shah P, El Masry H. The efficacy of posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arrhythm 2022; 38:275-286. [PMID: 35785381 PMCID: PMC9237313 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is an emerging approach in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, yet its efficacy remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in AF ablation. Objective To assess the efficacy of PWI in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence following initial AF ablation at long-term follow-ups when compared to conventional methods. Methods We conducted a literature search from inception through September 2021 in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included RCTs that compared outcomes in PWI and conventional approaches of AF ablation. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Eight RCT from 2009 to 2020, including 1024 AF patients, were included. PWI did not decrease overall atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR 0.96, 95% CI:0.88-1.05, I 2 = 31.6%, p-value 0.393). However, the pooled analysis showed a significant decrease in AF recurrence in PWI compared to controlled approaches (RR 0.88, 95% CI:0.81-0.96, I 2 = 48.2%, p-value .004). In the subgroup analysis, PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in the studies that included only persistent AF (RR = 0.89, 95% CI:0.80-0.98, I 2 = 65.2%, p-value .014). PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence when compared to PVI with roof line (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, I 2 0.00%, p-value .008). Conclusion Our study suggests that adding PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to controlled approaches. It highlights the importance of considering PWI during the initial procedure in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jakrin Kewcharoen
- Department of Medicine, Division of CardiologyLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma LindaCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Narut Prasitlumkum
- Department of cardiologyUniversity of California RiversideRiversideCaliforniaUSA
| | - Parthav Shah
- University of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency ProgramHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | - Hicham El Masry
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineMayo ClinicPhoenixArizonaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Charitakis E, Metelli S, Karlsson LO, Antoniadis AP, Rizas KD, Liuba I, Almroth H, Hassel Jönsson A, Schwieler J, Tsartsalis D, Sideris S, Dragioti E, Fragakis N, Chaimani A. Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis. BMC Med 2022; 20:193. [PMID: 35637488 PMCID: PMC9153169 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02385-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. RESULTS In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed. CONCLUSIONS This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020169494 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Charitakis
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Silvia Metelli
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Lars O Karlsson
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Antonios P Antoniadis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos D Rizas
- Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ioan Liuba
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Henrik Almroth
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anders Hassel Jönsson
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jonas Schwieler
- Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Skevos Sideris
- Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anna Chaimani
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hao J, Xi Y, Chen W, Liang Y, Lin Z, Wei W. Hybrid ablation procedure for the treatment of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2022; 45:1132-1140. [PMID: 35616829 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid ablation combines the advantages of surgical and catheter ablation. Many studies have explored the efficiency and safety of hybrid ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal AF. METHODS We systematically searched for prospective controlled trials that compared hybrid ablation with catheter/surgical ablation in PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Library and CNKI. Our main assessment indicators included maintenance of sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs for more than 12 months, major adverse events (MAEs), procedure time and fluoroscopy time. RESULTS Of 1214 identified studies, 5 were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 451 participants). The pooled results showed that hybrid ablation was more effective in maintaining SR than a single procedure (surgical ablation or catheter ablation) (OR = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.89, P<0.001). Little significant heterogeneity was revealed (P = 0.32 for heterogeneity, I2 = 14%). More MAEs occurred in the hybrid group than in the single procedure group (OR = 7.47, 95% CI: 1.90-29.41, P = 0.004; I2 = 0%). Two trials reported the procedure and fluoroscopy times, and the procedure time for hybrid ablation was significantly longer than that of a single procedure (mean difference = 107.42, 95% CI: 88.62 to 126.22, P < 0.001; I2 = 82%). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the 2 groups (mean difference = -1.00, 95% CI: -5.37 to 3.36, P = 0.65; I2 = 12%). CONCLUSIONS Hybrid ablation was more effective than catheter ablation and was as effective as surgical ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal AF. Meanwhile, hybrid ablation, especially concomitant hybrid ablation, increases the incidence of MAEs and prolongs the procedure time. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhai Hao
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Xi
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wanwen Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanfeng Liang
- Institute of Geriatric medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhanyi Lin
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Geriatric medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jiang X, Liao J, Ling Z, Meyer C, Sommer P, Futyma P, Martinek M, Schratter A, Acou WJ, Wang J, Zhu L, Kiuchi MG, Pürerfellner H, Schmidt B, Chun JKR, Yin Y, Chen S. Adjunctive Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation in Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Insight From a Large Secondary Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022; 8:605-618. [PMID: 35589173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the role of adjunctive left atrium posterior wall isolation (PWI) in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. BACKGROUND The left atrium posterior wall is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the development of AF. METHODS This was an updated pooled analysis that included clinical data regarding PWI plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in treating AF. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. RESULTS A total of 26 studies with 3,287 patients with AF (age 61.7 ± 10.8 years) were included. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 8.4 months. Procedural success to achieve PWI was 92.8%. In paroxysmal AF, adjunctive PWI did not reduce the recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (P = 0.21) or AF (P = 0.37); however, in persistent AF, adjunctive PWI was associated with substantially lower recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (risk ratio: 0.74; P < 0.001) and AF (risk ratio: 0.67; P = 0.01), particularly when randomized data were included. Subgroup analyses based on meta-regression demonstrated that patients with older age, a larger left atrial diameter, and persistent AF benefited more significantly from the adjunctive PWI. Adjunctive PWI using either radiofrequency or a cryoballoon reduced AF recurrence, whereas using radiofrequency seemed to be associated with higher recurrence rate of atrial tachycardias and/or atrial flutter. Non-BOX adjunctive PWI rather than BOX PWI was associated with significantly lower recurrence of AF. The incidence of procedural adverse events between the PVI+PWI (3.2%) and PVI (2.8%) groups was low and similar. PVI+PWI needed longer ablation and/or procedural time but had similar fluoroscopy time. CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive PWI can be achieved in most patients without compromising safety. Patients with persistent AF appear to benefit from this approach. The ablation technology and/or approach may affect the clinical outcome of PWI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jia Liao
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiyu Ling
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| | - Christian Meyer
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care, NEP, Cardiac Neuro- and Electrophysiology Research Consortium, Evangelisches Krankenhaus (EVK) Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Neural and Sensory Physiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp Sommer
- Klinik für Elektrophysiologie/Rhythmologie, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Piotr Futyma
- St. Joseph's Heart Rhythm Center, Medical College at University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Martin Martinek
- Department für Kardiologie und Elektrophysiologie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
| | | | | | - Jiazhi Wang
- Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lin Zhu
- Medizinisch-Geriatrische Klinik, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Márcio Galindo Kiuchi
- School of Medicine-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helmut Pürerfellner
- Department für Kardiologie und Elektrophysiologie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
| | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julian K R Chun
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Die Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Yuehui Yin
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shaojie Chen
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Die Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ding WY, Tovmassian L, Bierme C, Kozhuharov N, Snowdon RL, Gupta D. Ablation index-guided 50W radiofrequency ablation for left atrial posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2022; 22:200-206. [PMID: 35642824 PMCID: PMC9263631 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation for posterior wall isolation (PWI) using high-power, short-duration remains untested. We sought to evaluate the acute outcomes of AI-guided 50 W ablation vs. conventional ablation, and investigate the differences in relationship between contact force (CF), time and AI in both groups. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing first-time AI-guided ablation with PWI using either 50 W or 35–40 W ablation were enrolled. Acute procedural metrics and individual lesion level ablation data were compared between groups. Results 40 patients (50 W: n = 20, 35–40 W: n = 20) with atrial fibrillation were included. Total procedure time was significantly reduced with 50 W (120 vs. 143 mins, p = 0.004) and there was a trend toward decreased ablation time (22 vs. 28 mins, p = 0.052). First pass and acute success of PWI were comparable between the 50 W and 35–40 W groups (10 vs. 8 patients, p = 0.525 and 20 vs. 19 patients, p = 1.000, respectively). Individual lesion analysis of all 959 RF applications (50 W: n = 458, 35–40 W: n = 501) demonstrated that 50 W ablation led to lower ablation time per lesion (10.4 vs. 13.0s, p < 0.001), and increased AI (471 vs. 461, p < 0.001) and impedance drop (7.4 vs. 6.9ohms, p = 0.007). Excessive ablations (AI>600 for roof line; AI>500 elsewhere) were more frequently observed in the 50 W group (9.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.007). CF had very good discriminative capability for excessive ablation in both groups. At 50 W, limiting the CF to <10 g reduced the number of excessive ablations on the floor line and within the posterior box to 12% and 4%,respectively. Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months were comparable between the groups. Conclusion AI-guided 50 W RF ablation reduces the ablation time of individual lesions and total procedure time without compromising first pass and acute success rates of PWI or 12-month outcomes compared to conventional powers.
Collapse
|
37
|
Efficacy of electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall depends on the existence of left atrial low-voltage zone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Vessels 2022; 37:1757-1768. [PMID: 35441869 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02069-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modification of the low-voltage zone in the left atrium (LA-LVZ) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not shown sufficient improvement in arrhythmia-free survival in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Further, the effect of electrical posterior wall isolation (PWI) is controversial. We investigated the impact of existence of LA-LVZ on the outcome of patients undergoing additional PWI for PerAF. METHODS A total of 347 patients with PerAF who underwent primary catheter ablation with LA-LVZ based strategy were retrospectively analyzed. Voltage mapping in the left atrium (LA) was performed during sinus rhythm. Additional LVZ ablation was performed in patients with LA-LVZ. The operators decided whether additional PWIs were to be performed. RESULTS Of 347 patients, 108 had LA-LVZ. In the LVZ group, patients with additional PWI (N = 70) had higher rates of freedom from tachyarrhythmia recurrence than those without (77.1% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, even when patients were limited to those with LA-LVZ in areas other than the posterior wall (N = 85), PWI had higher success rates (80.9% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients without LVZ (N = 239), there was no significant difference in the rate of successful outcome between those with and without PWI (81.3% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.112). On the other hand, the patients with PWI had greater atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate than those without PWI (10.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS PWI, in addition to PVI and LVZ modification, may improve single procedural outcomes in patients with PerAF who have LVZ, regardless of the distribution in the LA. A combination of voltage-guided ablation and PWI may be a simple, tailored, and effective ablation strategy.
Collapse
|
38
|
Pope MT, Betts TR. Global Substrate Mapping and Targeted Ablation with Novel Gold-tip Catheter in De Novo Persistent AF. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2022; 11:e06. [PMID: 35755327 PMCID: PMC9204651 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Results from catheter ablation for persistent AF are suboptimal, with no strategy other than pulmonary vein isolation showing clear benefit. Recently employed empirical strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation involve widespread atrial ablation in all patients and do not take into account patient-specific differences in AF mechanisms or phenotype. Charge density mapping using the non-contact AcQMap system (Acutus Medical) allows visualisation of whole-chamber activation during AF and reveals localised patterns of complex activation thought to represent important mechanisms for AF maintenance that can be targeted with focal ablation. In this review, the authors outline the fundamentals of this technology, the initial data exploring the mechanistic role of activation patterns seen and the application to ablation of persistent AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Tb Pope
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Department for Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Timothy R Betts
- Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,University of Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ahn J, Shin DG, Han SJ, Lim HE. Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall using cryoballoon ablation improve clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Europace 2022; 24:1093-1101. [PMID: 35138376 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Posterior wall isolation (PWI) of the left atrium (LA) adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency catheter ablation has shown favourable outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). This study was sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of additional PWI by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) alone in patients with PeAF. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients who underwent de novo CBA for PeAF (n = 100) were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to the PVI only group and PVI combined with PWI (PVI+PWI) group. Procedural and clinical outcomes were prospectively compared over a 12-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics, including mean AF duration (56.2 ± 43.2 months) and LA size (48.2 ± 7.7 mm), were well-balanced between the groups. Successful PVI was achieved in all patients. In the PVI+PWI group, complete PWI by CBA was achieved in 31 (62%) patients. The LA indwelling and procedure times were significantly longer in the PVI+PWI group. The complication rates were not different between groups. During a mean follow-up of 457.9 ± 61.8 days, the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in the PVI+PWI group than in the PVI only group (24% vs. 46%; P = 0.035). The recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the PVI+PWI group compared with the PVI only group, irrespective of complete PWI (log-rank P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that adjunctive PWI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.255; P = 0.003] and LA size (HR 1.079; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of clinical recurrence. CONCLUSION Compared with PVI only, adjunctive PWI achieved exclusively by CBA resulted in better clinical outcomes without increasing complications in patients with PeAF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhee Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Geum Shin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Jin Han
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Euy Lim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 14068, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chieng D, Sugumar H, Ling LH, Segan L, Azzopardi S, Prabhu S, Al-Kaisey A, Voskoboinik A, Parameswaran R, Morton JB, Pathik B, McLellan AJ, Lee G, Wong M, Finch S, Pathak RK, Raja DC, Sanders P, Sterns L, Ginks M, Reid CM, Kalman JM, Kistler PM. Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter randomized trial of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) - The CAPLA study. Am Heart J 2022; 243:210-220. [PMID: 34619143 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is reduced in persistent AF (PsAF) compared to paroxysmal AF. Adjunctive ablation strategies have failed to show consistent incremental benefit over PVI alone in randomized studies. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential source of non-PV triggers and atrial substrate which may promote the initiation and maintenance of PsAF. Adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI had shown conflicting outcomes, with earlier studies confounded by methodological limitations. OBJECTIVES To determine whether combining PWI with PVI significantly improves freedom from AF recurrence, compared to PVI alone, in patients with PsAF. METHODS This is a multi-center, prospective, international randomized clinical trial. 338 patients with symptomatic PsAF refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy (AAD) will be randomized to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI in a 1:1 ratio. PVI involves wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, utilizing contact force sensing ablation catheters. PWI involves the creation of a floor line connecting the inferior aspect of the PVs, and a roof line connecting the superior aspect of the PVs. Follow up is for a minimum of 12 months with rhythm monitoring via implantable cardiac device and/or loop monitor, or frequent intermittent monitoring with an ECG device. The primary outcome is freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds off AAD at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. CONCLUSIONS This randomized study aims to determine the success and safety of adjunctive PWI to PVI in patients with persistent AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chieng
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hariharan Sugumar
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liang-Han Ling
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Private Hospital Fitzroy, Melbourne Australia
| | - Louise Segan
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sonia Azzopardi
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandeep Prabhu
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Mulgrave Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ahmed Al-Kaisey
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aleksandr Voskoboinik
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ramanathan Parameswaran
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph B Morton
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bhupesh Pathik
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex J McLellan
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Private Hospital Fitzroy, Melbourne Australia
| | - Geoffrey Lee
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Wong
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth Hospital Richmond, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue Finch
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rajeev K Pathak
- Canberra Hospital, ACT, Australia; Australian National University, ACT, Australia
| | - Deep Chandh Raja
- Canberra Hospital, ACT, Australia; Australian National University, ACT, Australia
| | | | - Laurence Sterns
- Royal Jubilee Hospital, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Christopher M Reid
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Jonathan M Kalman
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter M Kistler
- The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia,; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sirico G, Sirico D, Montisci A, Cerrato E, Morosato M, Panigada S, Ottaviano L, De Sanctis V, Mantica M. Contact-Force Guided Posterior Wall Isolation as an Adjunctive Ablation Strategy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation 2021; 14:20200475. [PMID: 34950369 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.20200475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background The efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still controversial and little is known about the impact of contact-force (CF) technology. Objective In this retrospective study, we present our experience with PWI using CF sensing catheters and its efficacy and safety as an adjunctive ablation strategy on top of PVI for management of patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF. Methods A total of 73 consecutive patients (20.5% female) affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (10.9% long-standing) underwent PWI as an adjunctive therapy to PVI using CF sensing catheters. Outcomes were reported as incidence of atrial arrhythmic recurrences (ARs) lasting >30 seconds at follow up and in addition, in patients provided with insertable cardiac monitors (ICM), as burden of AF or atrial tachycardias (AT) at relevant time points. Results PWI was successfully achieved in 65 (89.0%) patients. Two (2.7%) minor vascular procedural complications were observed. At 1 and 2-year follow-up, ARs free survival was observed in 80.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively with 75.3% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs at the last follow-up. Ten patients underwent repeat ablations during the follow-up. At multivariate analysis, early ARs within 3 months after procedure, were associated with a two-fold increased risk of late ARs at follow-up. Among patients provided with ICM, PWI on top of PVI was able to reduce the mean AT/AF burden of more than 50% compared with pre-ablation time, reporting very low levels (≤ 5%) over 2 years. Conclusions In persistent atrial fibrillation, PWI on top of PVI using CF sensing catheters is safe and effective, providing great reduction of burden of ARs. Early ARs are associated with a greater risk of late recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giusy Sirico
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Sirico
- Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Montisci
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiothoracic Center, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy and Chair of Cardiac Surgery, Postgraduate in Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiothoracic Center, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy and Chair of Cardiac Surgery, Postgraduate in Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cerrato
- Interventional Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano and Infermi Hospital, Rivoli (Torino), Italy and Chair of Cardiac Surgery, Postgraduate in Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Morosato
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Panigada
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Ottaviano
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio De Sanctis
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Mantica
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiologist and Pacing, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jankelson L, Garber L, Shulman E, Cohen RB, Peterson C, Wadhwani L, Nadeau-Routhier C, Xia Y, Barbhaiya C, Holmes D, Knotts R, Bernstein S, Kushnir A, Spinelli M, Park D, Aizer A, Chinitz L. Outcomes of posterior wall isolation with pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 33:209-217. [PMID: 34911157 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies have shown that addition of posterior wall isolation (PWI) may reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. No data on PWI in paroxysmal AF (pAF) patients with normal left atrial voltage is available, to date. OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients presenting with pAF and normal left atrial voltage. METHODS Consecutive patient registry analysis was performed on all patients with pAF and normal left atrial voltage undergoing initial radiofrequency ablation from November 1, 2018 to November 15, 2019. Primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL). RESULTS A total of 321 patients were studied, 214 in the PVI group and 107 in the PWI + PVI group. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia occurred in 18.2% of patients in the PVI group and 16.8% in the PVI + PWI cohort (p = 0.58). At 1 year, recurrence was 14.0% in the PVI group and 15.0% in the PWI + PVI group (p = 0.96). There was a lower AT/AFL recurrence in the PVI + PWI group, not reaching significance (3.7% in the PWI + PVI group vs. 7.9% in PVI group, p = 0.31). Need for carina lesions predicted recurrence in the PVI-only group. CONCLUSIONS Addition of PWI to PVI in pAF patients undergoing their first ablation did not reduce the frequency of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. This warrants further study in a prospective trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lior Jankelson
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leonid Garber
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Shulman
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Bar Cohen
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Connor Peterson
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lalit Wadhwani
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Charles Nadeau-Routhier
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuhe Xia
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chirag Barbhaiya
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas Holmes
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Knotts
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Scott Bernstein
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexander Kushnir
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Spinelli
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Park
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anthony Aizer
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Larry Chinitz
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
DeLurgio DB, Gill JS, Ahsan S, Kaba RA, Plasseraud KM, Halkos ME. Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the Treatment of Persistent and Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2021; 10:198-204. [PMID: 34777825 PMCID: PMC8576514 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances have been made in AF treatment, including the role of early rhythm control and landmark clinical trials using ablation therapy. However, some treatment gaps remain, including the creation of durable lesions outside the pulmonary veins and effective treatment of longstanding persistent AF. A novel epicardial-endocardial ablation approach - the hybrid convergent procedure - was developed to combine surgical and catheter ablation techniques into a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to managing AF. In this review, the authors discuss recently published data on hybrid convergent ablation, including results of the CONVERGE clinical trial, in the context of current challenges to treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent AF. The review also aims to provide perspective on outstanding questions and future directions in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Riyaz A Kaba
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Inoue K, Hikoso S, Masuda M, Furukawa Y, Hirata A, Egami Y, Watanabe T, Minamiguchi H, Miyoshi M, Tanaka N, Oka T, Okada M, Kanda T, Matsuda Y, Kawasaki M, Hayashi K, Kitamura T, Dohi T, Sunaga A, Mizuno H, Nakatani D, Sakata Y. Pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation with defragmentation and linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: the EARNEST-PVI trial. Europace 2021; 23:565-574. [PMID: 33200213 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Previous studies could not demonstrate any benefit of more intensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation for recurrence in the initial catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus these additional ablation strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n = 512, long-standing persistent AF; 128 cases) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus CFAE and/or linear ablation (PVI-plus group). After excluding 15 cases who did not receive procedures, we analysed 249 and 248 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the non-inferior margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.43. In the PVI-plus group, 85.1% of patients had linear ablation and 15.3% CFAE ablation. After 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint occurred in 71.3% of patients in the PVI-alone group and in 78.3% in the PVI-plus group [hazard ratio = 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.24), non-inferior P = 0.3062]. The procedure-related complication rates were 2.0% in the PVI-alone group and 3.6% in the PVI-plus group (P = 0.199). CONCLUSION This randomized trial did not establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus linear ablation or CFAE ablation in patients with persistent AF, but implied that the PVI plus strategy was promising to improve the clinical efficacy (NCT03514693).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Inoue
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Shungo Hikoso
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Masaharu Masuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Yoshio Furukawa
- Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Akio Hirata
- Division of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Egami
- Cardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Hitoshi Minamiguchi
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Miwa Miyoshi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Tanaka
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Takafumi Oka
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Masato Okada
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Takashi Kanda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Masato Kawasaki
- Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hayashi
- Department of Cardiology, Osaka Hospital, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsuhisa Kitamura
- Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Dohi
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sunaga
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Hiroya Mizuno
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Daisaku Nakatani
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | - Yasushi Sakata
- Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi-Watanabe Hospital, 2-4-32 Umeda, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0001, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nogami A, Kurita T, Abe H, Ando K, Ishikawa T, Imai K, Usui A, Okishige K, Kusano K, Kumagai K, Goya M, Kobayashi Y, Shimizu A, Shimizu W, Shoda M, Sumitomo N, Seo Y, Takahashi A, Tada H, Naito S, Nakazato Y, Nishimura T, Nitta T, Niwano S, Hagiwara N, Murakawa Y, Yamane T, Aiba T, Inoue K, Iwasaki Y, Inden Y, Uno K, Ogano M, Kimura M, Sakamoto S, Sasaki S, Satomi K, Shiga T, Suzuki T, Sekiguchi Y, Soejima K, Takagi M, Chinushi M, Nishi N, Noda T, Hachiya H, Mitsuno M, Mitsuhashi T, Miyauchi Y, Miyazaki A, Morimoto T, Yamasaki H, Aizawa Y, Ohe T, Kimura T, Tanemoto K, Tsutsui H, Mitamura H. JCS/JHRS 2019 guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias. J Arrhythm 2021; 37:709-870. [PMID: 34386109 PMCID: PMC8339126 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
46
|
Aryana A. Rationale and Outcomes of Cryoballoon Ablation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall in Conjunction with Pulmonary Vein Isolation. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2021; 12:4633-4646. [PMID: 34476116 PMCID: PMC8384303 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is strong evidence in support of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with concomitant left atrial (LA) posterior wall (PW) isolation (PWI) for the treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). While this may be achieved using surgical and catheter-based strategies, there is growing interest in performing this approach using the cryoballoon. There are several potential advantages to this strategy. First, lesions created using the current-generation cryoballoons are typically large and durable. Second, cryoballoon ablation offers a simple technique to directly ablate and debulk the LAPW. Moreover, some consider cryoenergy a safer modality specifically with regard to collateral structures (ie, the esophagus). Based on the available data, cryoballoon PVI + PWI is associated with greater intraprocedural AF terminations and reductions in long-term AF recurrence (typically by ~20%), as compared to PVI alone in patients with persAF, but with similar rates of adverse events. As such, PVI + PWI has emerged as a significant predictor of freedom from recurrent AF (odds ratio: 3.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-9.34; p = 0.006) as well as all atrial arrhythmias (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-3.61; p = 0.015). Adjunct radiofrequency ablation to complete PWI is required in at least one-third of the patients, and this need is highly predicted by the LA size (significantly increased with an LA diameter > 48 mm). LAPW reconnection also seems to be associated with LA dimension, particularly an LA diameter greater than 48 mm (negative predictive value: 89.7%). Nevertheless, based on the analysis of patients who underwent repeat electrophysiology study for arrhythmia recurrences, cryoballoon PVI + PWI yields acceptable long-term durability (> 80%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Aryana
- Dignity Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Mercy General Hospital, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kaba RA, Momin A, Camm J. Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation and Ablation Strategies. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3129. [PMID: 34300301 PMCID: PMC8304563 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global disease with rapidly rising incidence and prevalence. It is associated with a higher risk of stroke, dementia, cognitive decline, sudden and cardiovascular death, heart failure and impairment in quality of life. The disease is a major burden on the healthcare system. Paroxysmal AF is typically managed with medications or endocardial catheter ablation to good effect. However, a large proportion of patients with AF have persistent or long-standing persistent AF, which are more complex forms of the condition and thus more difficult to treat. This is in part due to the progressive electro-anatomical changes that occur with AF persistence and the spread of arrhythmogenic triggers and substrates outside of the pulmonary veins. The posterior wall of the left atrium is a common site for these changes and has become a target of ablation strategies to treat these more resistant forms of AF. In this review, we discuss the role of the posterior left atrial wall in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, the limitations of current endocardial-focused treatment strategies, and future perspectives on hybrid epicardial-endocardial approaches to posterior wall isolation or ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riyaz A. Kaba
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George’s University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK; (A.M.); (J.C.)
- Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
| | - Aziz Momin
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George’s University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK; (A.M.); (J.C.)
- Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey KT16 0PZ, UK
| | - John Camm
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George’s University of London and St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK; (A.M.); (J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Clarke JRD, Piccini JP, Friedman DJ. The role of posterior wall isolation in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:2567-2576. [PMID: 34258794 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The left atrial posterior wall has many embryologic, anatomic, and electrophysiologic characteristics, that are important for the initiation and maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential target for ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, a population in whom pulmonary vein isolation alone has resulted in unsatisfactory recurrence rates. Published clinical studies report conflicting results on the safety and efficacy of posterior wall isolation. Emerging technologies including optimized use of radiofrequency ablation, pulse field ablation, and combined endocardial/epicardial ablation may optimize approaches to posterior wall isolation and reduce the risk of injury to nearby structures such as the esophagus. Critical evaluation of future and ongoing clinical studies of posterior wall isolation requires careful scrutiny of many characteristics, including intraprocedural definition of posterior wall isolation, concomitant extrapulmonary vein ablation, and study endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John-Ross D Clarke
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center & Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel J Friedman
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center & Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Magni FT, Al-Jazairi MIH, Mulder BA, Klinkenberg T, Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Mariani MA, Blaauw Y. First-line treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation with single-stage hybrid ablation: a 2-year follow-up study. Europace 2021; 23:1568-1576. [PMID: 34143871 PMCID: PMC8502496 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of first-line single-stage hybrid ablation of (long-standing) persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), over a follow-up period of 2 years, and provides additional information on arrhythmia recurrences and electrophysiological findings at repeat ablation. Methods and results This is a prospective cohort study that included 49 patients (65% persistent AF; 35% long-standing persistent AF) who underwent hybrid ablation as first-line ablation treatment (no previous endocardial ablation). Patients were relatively young (57.0 ± 8.5 years) and predominantly male (89.8%). Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.0 (0.5; 2.0) and mean left atrium volume index was 43.7 ± 10.9 mL/m2. Efficacy was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiography and 72-h Holter monitoring after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Recurrence was defined as AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/tachycardia (AT) recorded by electrocardiography or Holter monitoring lasting >30 s during 2-year follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, single and multiple procedure success rates were 67% and 82%, respectively. Two (4%) patients experienced a major complication (bleeding) requiring intervention following hybrid ablation. Among the 16 (33%) patients who experienced an AF/AFL/AT recurrence, 13 (81%) were ATs/AFLs and only 3 (19%) were AF. Repeat ablation was performed in 10 (20%) patients and resulted in sinus rhythm in 7 (70%) at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion First-line single-stage hybrid AF ablation is an effective treatment strategy for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF with an acceptable rate of major complications. Recurrences are predominantly AFL/AT that can be successfully ablated percutaneously. Hybrid ablation seems a feasible approach for first-line ablation of (long-standing) persistent AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico T Magni
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Meelad I H Al-Jazairi
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart A Mulder
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo Klinkenberg
- Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle C Van Gelder
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Rienstra
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo A Mariani
- Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yuri Blaauw
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nogami A, Kurita T, Abe H, Ando K, Ishikawa T, Imai K, Usui A, Okishige K, Kusano K, Kumagai K, Goya M, Kobayashi Y, Shimizu A, Shimizu W, Shoda M, Sumitomo N, Seo Y, Takahashi A, Tada H, Naito S, Nakazato Y, Nishimura T, Nitta T, Niwano S, Hagiwara N, Murakawa Y, Yamane T, Aiba T, Inoue K, Iwasaki Y, Inden Y, Uno K, Ogano M, Kimura M, Sakamoto SI, Sasaki S, Satomi K, Shiga T, Suzuki T, Sekiguchi Y, Soejima K, Takagi M, Chinushi M, Nishi N, Noda T, Hachiya H, Mitsuno M, Mitsuhashi T, Miyauchi Y, Miyazaki A, Morimoto T, Yamasaki H, Aizawa Y, Ohe T, Kimura T, Tanemoto K, Tsutsui H, Mitamura H. JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Circ J 2021; 85:1104-1244. [PMID: 34078838 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Nogami
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- Department of Heart Rhythm Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Kenji Ando
- Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital
| | - Toshiyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University
| | - Katsuhiko Imai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center
| | - Akihiko Usui
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kaoru Okishige
- Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital
| | - Kengo Kusano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | | | - Masahiko Goya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | | | | | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School
| | - Morio Shoda
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Naokata Sumitomo
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | - Yoshihiro Seo
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | | | - Hiroshi Tada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui
| | | | - Yuji Nakazato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital
| | - Takashi Nishimura
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Shinichi Niwano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | | | - Yuji Murakawa
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University Hospital Mizonokuchi
| | - Teiichi Yamane
- Department of Cardiology, Jikei University School of Medicine
| | - Takeshi Aiba
- Division of Arrhythmia, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Koichi Inoue
- Division of Arrhythmia, Cardiovascular Center, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital
| | - Yuki Iwasaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School
| | - Yasuya Inden
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kikuya Uno
- Arrhythmia Center, Chiba Nishi General Hospital
| | - Michio Ogano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shizuoka Medical Center
| | - Masaomi Kimura
- Advanced Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Shingo Sasaki
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Tsuyoshi Shiga
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Tsugutoshi Suzuki
- Departments of Pediatric Electrophysiology, Osaka City General Hospital
| | - Yukio Sekiguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | - Kyoko Soejima
- Arrhythmia Center, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University Hospital
| | - Masahiko Takagi
- Division of Cardiac Arrhythmia, Department of Internal Medicine II, Kansai Medical University
| | - Masaomi Chinushi
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Niigata University
| | - Nobuhiro Nishi
- Department of Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Takashi Noda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Hitoshi Hachiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
| | | | | | - Yasushi Miyauchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Chiba-Hokusoh Hospital
| | - Aya Miyazaki
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital
| | - Tomoshige Morimoto
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical College
| | - Hiro Yamasaki
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | | | | | - Takeshi Kimura
- Department of Cardiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Kazuo Tanemoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|