Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall improve clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?

Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation for atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) plus traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been proposed as a promising intervention to decrease atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding PWI to the traditional PVI in patients with AF.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Cochrane through June 14, 2023. We used Stata version 17 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023446227).

RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with a total number of 1534 patients. Combined ablation with PWI + PVI was not associated with any significant difference over PVI only regarding the recurrence of clinical AF (RR: 0.86 with 95% CI [0.70-1.06]), all atrial arrhythmia (RR: 0.93 with 95% CI [0.82-1.07]), nonatrial fibrillation arrhythmia (RR: 1.22 with 95% CI [0.97-1.53]), early AF (RR: 0.89 with 95% CI [0.62-1.27]), and antiarrhythmic drugs at discharge (RR: 0.83 with 95% CI [0.67-1.04]). However, it was associated with increased total ablation duration (minutes) (MD: 12.58 with 95% CI [6.80-18.37]) and total procedure duration (minutes) (MD: 16.77 with 95% CI [9.63-23.91]), without any significant difference regarding adverse events (RR: 1.05 with 95% CI [0.63-1.74]).

CONCLUSION

While the pooled data from PWI + PVI using point-by-point radiofrequency did not suggest a benefit in the recurrence of various atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone, PWI+PVI using direct posterior wall ablation, especially with cryoballoon, demonstrated a significant reduction in recurrence of AF/atrial arrhythmias. Also, PWI + PVI significantly increased the ablation and total procedure durations.

In Silico TRials guide optimal stratification of ATrIal FIbrillation patients to Catheter Ablation and pharmacological medicaTION: the i-STRATIFICATION study

AIMS

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) experience 50% recurrence despite pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and no consensus is established for secondary treatments. The aim of our i-STRATIFICATION study is to provide evidence for stratifying patients with AF recurrence after PVI to optimal pharmacological and ablation therapies, through in silico trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cohort of 800 virtual patients, with variability in atrial anatomy, electrophysiology, and tissue structure (low-voltage areas, LVAs), was developed and validated against clinical data from ionic currents to electrocardiogram. Virtual patients presenting AF post-PVI underwent 12 secondary treatments. Sustained AF developed in 522 virtual patients after PVI. Second ablation procedures involving left atrial ablation alone showed 55% efficacy, only succeeding in the small right atria (<60 mL). When additional cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation was considered, Marshall-PLAN sufficed (66% efficacy) for the small left atria (<90 mL). For the bigger left atria, a more aggressive ablation approach was required, such as anterior mitral line (75% efficacy) or posterior wall isolation plus mitral isthmus ablation (77% efficacy). Virtual patients with LVAs greatly benefited from LVA ablation in the left and right atria (100% efficacy). Conversely, in the absence of LVAs, synergistic ablation and pharmacotherapy could terminate AF. In the absence of ablation, the patient's ionic current substrate modulated the response to antiarrhythmic drugs, being the inward currents critical for optimal stratification to amiodarone or vernakalant.

CONCLUSION

In silico trials identify optimal strategies for AF treatment based on virtual patient characteristics, evidencing the power of human modelling and simulation as a clinical assisting tool.

2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play

Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Left atrial posterior wall isolation using pulsed-field ablation: procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Non-pulmonary vein (PV) ablation targets such as posterior wall isolation (PWI) have been tested in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers a novel ablation technology possibly able to overcome the obstacles of incomplete PWI and concerns of damage to adjacent structures compared to thermal energy sources. Our aim was to assess procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing PWI using PFA in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PFA-PVI with PWI were included. First-pass isolation was controlled using a multipolar mapping catheter.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive patients were included (median age 69 [IQR 63-75] years, 33 females (33%), left atrial size 43 [IQR 39-47] mm, paroxysmal AF 24%). Median procedure time was 66 (IQR 59-77) min, and fluoroscopy time was 11 (8-14) min. PWI using PFA was achieved in 100% of patients with a median of 19 applications (IQR 14-26). There were no major complications. Overall, in 15 patients (15%), recurrent AF/AT was noted during a median follow-up of 144 (94-279) days.

CONCLUSIONS

PWI using PFA appears safe and results in high acute isolation rates and high arrhythmia survival during mid-term follow-up. Further randomized trials are essential and warranted.

Adjunctive posterior wall isolation for the treatment of persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (CORNERSTONE AF) trial: Design and rationale

BACKGROUND

A left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) is one of the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategies.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that an additional empirical LAPWI would increase the freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias as compared to standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients.

METHODS

The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study investigating patients with AF persisting for >7 days and <3 years undergoing first-time AF ablation. They will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI + LAPWI in a 1:1 manner. Although PVI can be performed with either radiofrequency catheters or cryoballoons, only radiofrequency catheters will be permitted to achieve LAPWIs. Additional focal ablation targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers will be allowed. A total of 516 patients will be enrolled in 17 centers between August 2022 and February 2024 based on the calculation with 80% power, considering the assumption that 65% and 75% of the PVI and PVI + LAPWI group patients will be free from atrial arrhythmia recurrence 18-months postprocedure (10% of dropout). The primary endpoint is freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias 18 months postsingle procedures. Clinical follow-up will include 7-day ambulatory electrocardiograms and routine outpatient consultations by electrophysiologists at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

As of August 2023, a total of 331 patients (68 ± 9 years, 270 men, 43 longstanding persistent AF) have been enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORNERSTONE AF study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an adjunctive empirical LAPWI following standard AF ablation in persistent AF patients.

Posterior wall ablation by pulsed-field ablation: procedural safety, efficacy, and findings on redo procedures

AIMS

The left atrial posterior wall is a potential ablation target in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation despite durable pulmonary vein isolation or in patients with roof-dependent atrial tachycardia (AT). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers efficient and safe posterior wall ablation (PWA), but available data are scarce.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing PWA using PFA were included. Posterior wall ablation was performed using a pentaspline PFA catheter and verified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping. Follow-up was performed using 7-day Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 s was defined as failure. Lesion durability was assessed during redo procedures. Posterior wall ablation was performed in 215 patients (70% males, median age 70 [IQR 61-75] years, 67% redo procedures) and was successful in all patients (100%) by applying a median of 36 (IQR 32-44) PFA lesions. Severe adverse events were cardiac tamponade and vascular access complication in one patient each (0.9%). Median follow-up was 7.3 (IQR 5.0-11.8) months. One-year arrhythmia-free outcome in Kaplan-Meier analysis was 53%. A redo procedure was performed in 26 patients (12%) after a median of 6.9 (IQR 2.4-11) months and showed durable PWA in 22 patients (85%) with only minor lesion regression. Among four patients with posterior wall reconnection, three (75%) presented with roof-dependent AT.

CONCLUSION

Posterior wall ablation with this pentaspline PFA catheter can be safely and efficiently performed with a high durability observed during redo procedures. The added value of durable PWA for the treatment of atrial fibrillation remains to be evaluated.

Differences in the feasibility, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and isolation area of a left atrial posterior wall isolation using radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheters

BACKGROUNDS

The difficulty and outcome of the adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) may be affected by the ablation energy used. This study aimed to compare the completion rate, anatomical parameters predicting procedural difficulty, and the isolation area of a LAPWI between the use of radiofrequency (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA).

METHODS

We enrolled 95 and 93 patients with PersAF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)+LAPWI using RFA (RF group) and CBA (CB group), respectively. Preoperative computed tomography was used to evaluate the anatomical features associated with an incomplete LAPWI. Post-ablation 3-dimensional maps were analyzed to quantify the isolation area.

RESULTS

The completion rate of the LAPWI was significantly higher in the RF group than the CB group without touch-up RFA (88.4% vs. 72.0%; p = .005). Predictors of incomplete LAPWI were a longer left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV)-esophageal distance (p < .001) for RFA and a steeper angle of the LAPW (p < .001) and longer transverse LAPW diameter (p = .016) for CBA. The isolated non-PV area with RFA or CBA alone was significantly greater in the CB group than the RF group (27.5 ± 9.5 cm2 vs. 22.9 ± 6.9 cm2 ; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The position of the esophagus at a distance from the LIPV was associated with an incomplete LAPWI using RFA, while a steeper angle of the LAPW and transverse enlargement of the LAPW were associated with that using CBA. The completion rate of the LAPWI was higher with RFA, but the isolation area outside of the PVs was greater with CBA.

Box Lesion Isolation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall with Radiofrequency Ablation Restricted in Predetermined Lines for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Prognostic Role of Acute Interventional Outcome and Trigger Identification

The left atrial posterior wall (PW) is known to be a critical substrate for the initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been explored as a target for catheter ablation, particularly in persistent AF (PerAF). In this retrospective study, we investigate the clinical outcome of patients with PerAF who underwent PW isolation (PWI) restricted in predetermined lines in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). One hundred consecutive patients (64 ± 9.1 years, 66% male, 20% with previous PVI ablation) underwent PWI in a box lesion setting for PerAF lasting >3 months (34% long-standing PerAF). PW triggers were defined as either foci from the PW that repeatedly induced AF or as isolated AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) within the PW. After a mean follow-up period of 25.6 ± 6.7 months, 61% of the patients remained in sinus rhythm after the last procedure. In 79 patients, the PW was successfully isolated, while, in 21 patients, complete isolation was not possible due to failure in completion of the roof line (n = 16), the floor line (n = 7), or both (n = 2). Patients with incomplete isolation had similar AF/AT recurrence rates compared to those with complete PWI. In 12 patients, PW triggers were identified, and PWI in these patients was shown to have a significantly better prognosis in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance (P = .031). Failure of complete PWI does not predispose a patient to an inferior outcome nor is it responsible for iatrogenic ATs. The presence of AF triggers within the PW leads to a particularly favorable result after box lesion isolation.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A review of techniques

Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a key area of current research. A multitude of techniques have been tested, some of which are poorly evidenced and not recommended in routine clinical practice whilst others are more promising. Additionally, a plethora of issues exist when researching ablation techniques, from control arm ablation strategy to the relevance of outcome measures. In this review article, we discuss these issues in the context of the current evidence base.

Catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation with versus without left atrial posterior wall isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the results are suboptimal for persistent AF. The left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is thought to be a major additional area in initiation and perpetuation of persistent AF. Therefore, adjunctive ablation of the posterior wall may reduce AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF using PVI alone versus a combination of PVI and LAPW isolation.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Embase since inception to February 2023. Screening of studies was done via Covidence software. Risk of bias assessment was done using appropriate tools. Data extraction and a narrative synthesis were carried out accordingly.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, of which five were randomized controlled trials. PVI with LAPW ablation group had significantly lower recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR 0.47, CI 0.32-0.70) and AF (OR 0.39, CI 0.23-0.69). In sensitivity analysis, freedom from atrial arrhythmias was noted to be significantly higher in the PVI with LAPW ablation group (OR 2.22, CI 1.36-3.64). However, there was no significant difference in occurrence of atrial flutter (OR 1.36, CI 0.86-2.14) or with periprocedural adverse events (OR 1.10, CI 0.60-1.99).

CONCLUSION

LAPW ablation, in addition to PVI, significantly improves the rates of arrhythmia freedom and reduces the recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia. There was no significant difference in atrial flutter or periprocedural adverse events.

Safety and Effectiveness of Adjunctive Posterior Wall Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis

As the atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence rate remains high after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) has been studied in randomized controlled trials, however, the results are conflicting. We performed an updated meta-analysis by searching online databases for the randomized controlled trials comparing the PWI + PVI group to the PVI alone group in patients with AF. The outcomes of interest were AF recurrence, all atrial arrhythmia recurrence, and atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random effects model. A total of 1,612 patients, with 807 in the PWI + PVI group and 805 in the PVI alone group were included. The mean age was 60 (9) years, 75% were men and 71% had persistent AF. The PWI + PVI group had lower AF recurrence as compared with the PVI alone group (25% vs 32%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in all atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.04, p = 0.16), atrial flutter/AT recurrence (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.55, p = 0.19) or adverse event rates in the 2 groups (36 vs 31; RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.77, p = 0.73). In conclusion, adjunctive PWI in addition to PVI can be achieved with lower AF recurrence but with a nonsignificant increase in atrial flutter/AT recurrence, resulting in an overall similar rate of all atrial arrhythmia recurrence without increasing the risk of adverse events, when compared with PVI alone strategy.

Ablative Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) with Posterior Wall Isolation (PWI): Where Do We Stand?

Atrial fibrillation is a diverse clinical entity, with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) being particularly challenging to manage. Through this paper, we discuss notable developments in our understanding of ablative strategies for managing PeAF, with a special focus on posterior wall isolation (PWI).

In-hospital complications associated with pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive lesions: the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry

AIMS

No prior study has been adequately powered to evaluate real-world safety outcomes in those receiving adjunctive ablation lesions beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to evaluate characteristics and in-hospital complications among patients undergoing PVI with and without adjunctive lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between 2016 and 2020 were identified and stratified into paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF, and separated into PVI only, PVI + cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, and PVI + adjunctive (superior vena cava isolation, coronary sinus, vein of Marshall, atypical atrial flutter lines, other). Adjusted odds of adverse events were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 50 937 patients [PAF: 30 551 (60%), persistent AF: 20 386 (40%)] were included. Among those with PAF, there were no differences in the adjusted odds of complications between PVI + CTI or PVI + adjunctive when compared with PVI only. Among persistent AF, PVI + adjunctive was associated with a higher risk of any complication [3.0 vs. 4.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.58] and major complication (0.8 vs. 1.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-2.21), while no differences were observed in PVI + CTI compared with PVI only. Overall, there was high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion type, and those receiving adjunctive lesions had a higher comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSION

Additional CTI ablation was common without an increased risk of complications. Adjunctive lesions other than CTI are commonly performed in those with more comorbidities and were associated with an increased risk of complications in persistent AF, although the current analysis is limited by high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion set type.

Efficacy and Safety Ablation Index-Guided High-Energy Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PVI Plus Linear Ablation of Mitral Isthmus and Posterior Box Isolation

BACKGROUND

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (AI)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial (LA) posterior box isolation is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) combined with linear ablation of LA roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and MI compare with the PVI-alone method in patients of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

362 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers. A total of 200 cases were in PVI-plus group and 162 cases were in PVI-alone group. The PVI-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. PVI combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI)and MI were performed in the PVI-plus group. The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia. After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the PVI-plus group and 62.5% in the PVI-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012). The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in PVI-plus group and 1.9% in PVI-alone group (p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (PVI plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent AF patients. Compared with the PVI-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF.

Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison.

OBJECTIVE

To compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Investigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

The PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Among 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, -1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P < .001) and ablation times (34 [SD, 21] vs 28 [SD, 12] minutes, P < .001) were significantly shorter for PVI alone. There were 6 complications for PVI with PWI and 4 for PVI alone.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460.

Risk and benefit of extrapulmonary vein ablation in atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the recent development, benefit, and safety of extrapulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation.

RECENT FINDING

Studies have shown that extrapulmonary vein ablation can help maintain normal sinus rhythm for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. As prior strategies targeting anatomical lines and triggers are well utilized, novel techniques for substrate mapping have been rapidly developing. These strategies are well tolerated and could be chosen based on patients' conditions and physicians' experience.

SUMMARY

Extrapulmonary vein ablation could be safely and effectively performed for patients with atrial fibrillation. It provides further consolidation of normal sinus rhythm.

Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance.

RESULTS

Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation.

Prospective evaluation of local impedance drop to guide left atrial posterior wall ablation with high power

BACKGROUND

Local impedance (LI) drop predicts acute conduction block during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Whether the LI drop predicts also the achievement of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) patients is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and the safety of LI drop-guided LAPW ablation by using high power (50 watts) and investigated the impact of ablation parameters on the LI drop.

METHODS

We included consecutive PersAF patients underwent PVI and both roof line and floor line completion to achieve LAPWI with a novel contact force (CF)- and LI-featured catheter (IntellaNAV Stablepoint™). For each radiofrequency (RF) application, we targeted a LI drop of 25 ohms.

RESULTS

Out of 30 patients, first-pass floor line block was achieved in 26 (87%) and first-pass roof line block in 17 (57%), resulting in first-pass LAPWI in 14 patients (47%). After touch-up ablations, LAPWI was achieved in 28 patients (93%) with endocardial ablation only. No procedural nor 1-month complications occurred. Overall, 877 RF applications were delivered: 787 ablation tags (89%) were associated with acute conduction block, while 90 (11%) were located at sites of acute gaps in either the roof or floor line. LI drop values were greater at segments with acute block than those with gaps (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, only LI drop and RF time remained independently associated with the acute block (p < 0.001; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LI drop-guided LAPWI at a fixed power of 50 W was effective and did not lead to complications. LI drop was the most important predictor of acute conduction block.

Clinical Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation in Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation alone for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remain unclear. Adjuvant posterior wall isolation (PWI) has become a potential supplementary strategy for improving the outcome of PerAF ablation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of PWI added to catheter ablation for PerAF.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing the outcomes of PerAF ablation with and without PWI. The efficacy outcomes were recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (AA), atrial fibrillation (AF), and atrial tachycardia (AT), and the safety outcome was adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 8 studies with 1428 patients were included in the pooled analyses. The results showed that PWI significantly reduced the recurrence of AA (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55-0.87, p = 0.002, I² = 63%) and AF (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40 - 0.80, p = 0.001, I² = 70%). AT recurrence (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.67 - 1.27, p = 0.63, I² = 42%) and adverse events (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.67-1.84, p = 0.70, I² = 0%) were comparable between the two groups. In the sub-analyses, the efficacy of PWI in reducing AA recurrence was consistent in patients who underwent cryoablation or debulking ablation.

CONCLUSION

PWI effectively decreased AA recurrence after PerAF ablation without increasing the risk of AT or procedure-related complications. However, more randomized studies are needed to confirm these results. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Convergent Ablation and AtriClip Exclusion of the Left Atrial Appendage in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

We here present a case of a 54-year-old man with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to direct current electrical cardioversion who underwent a concurrent convergent ablation and Atriclip exclusion of left atrial appendage. His preoperative echocardiography revealed dilated 5.8 cm left atrium with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction of 50%. Transmural isolation of pulmonary veins was performed through a subxiphoid approach, and 3 left-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ports were utilised to occlude the base of the left atrium appendage with the Atriclip device. A peri-operative transoesophageal echocardiogram confirmed left atrium appendage base occlusion, and the patient was in sinus rhythm after having a single 200 kJ direct current cardioversion shock. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged with preprocedural anticoagulant after 24 hours of the procedure and advised to come for follow up after 3 months.

Cryoballoon Ablation Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the Setting of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation has been demonstrated to be a safe and an effective treatment for drug resistant atrial fibrillation (AF); electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the main strategy in paroxysmal AF, since pulmonary vein triggers have a pivotal role in its pathogenesis; non-paroxysmal AF is a complex arrhythmia that results from the interplay of a substrate, namely AF-induced electrical and structural atrial remodeling, and a trigger that can be often found outside pulmonary veins, namely non-pulmonary veins triggers.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of non-pulmonary veins triggers with special focus on cryoballoon (CB) catheter ablation.

EXPERT OPINION

Besides PVI, CB catheter ablation of non-pulmonary veins triggers is a novel and promising strategy for non-paroxysmal AF.

Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020169494 .

Hybrid ablation procedure for the treatment of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hybrid ablation combines the advantages of surgical and catheter ablation. Many studies have explored the efficiency and safety of hybrid ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal AF.

METHODS

We systematically searched for prospective controlled trials that compared hybrid ablation with catheter/surgical ablation in PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Library and CNKI. Our main assessment indicators included maintenance of sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs for more than 12 months, major adverse events (MAEs), procedure time and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

Of 1214 identified studies, 5 were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 451 participants). The pooled results showed that hybrid ablation was more effective in maintaining SR than a single procedure (surgical ablation or catheter ablation) (OR = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.89, P<0.001). Little significant heterogeneity was revealed (P = 0.32 for heterogeneity, I² = 14%). More MAEs occurred in the hybrid group than in the single procedure group (OR = 7.47, 95% CI: 1.90-29.41, P = 0.004; I² = 0%). Two trials reported the procedure and fluoroscopy times, and the procedure time for hybrid ablation was significantly longer than that of a single procedure (mean difference = 107.42, 95% CI: 88.62 to 126.22, P < 0.001; I² = 82%). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the 2 groups (mean difference = -1.00, 95% CI: -5.37 to 3.36, P = 0.65; I² = 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid ablation was more effective than catheter ablation and was as effective as surgical ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal AF. Meanwhile, hybrid ablation, especially concomitant hybrid ablation, increases the incidence of MAEs and prolongs the procedure time. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Adjunctive Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation in Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Insight From a Large Secondary Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the role of adjunctive left atrium posterior wall isolation (PWI) in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

BACKGROUND

The left atrium posterior wall is an arrhythmogenic substrate that contributes to the development of AF.

METHODS

This was an updated pooled analysis that included clinical data regarding PWI plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in treating AF. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies with 3,287 patients with AF (age 61.7 ± 10.8 years) were included. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 8.4 months. Procedural success to achieve PWI was 92.8%. In paroxysmal AF, adjunctive PWI did not reduce the recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (P = 0.21) or AF (P = 0.37); however, in persistent AF, adjunctive PWI was associated with substantially lower recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias (risk ratio: 0.74; P < 0.001) and AF (risk ratio: 0.67; P = 0.01), particularly when randomized data were included. Subgroup analyses based on meta-regression demonstrated that patients with older age, a larger left atrial diameter, and persistent AF benefited more significantly from the adjunctive PWI. Adjunctive PWI using either radiofrequency or a cryoballoon reduced AF recurrence, whereas using radiofrequency seemed to be associated with higher recurrence rate of atrial tachycardias and/or atrial flutter. Non-BOX adjunctive PWI rather than BOX PWI was associated with significantly lower recurrence of AF. The incidence of procedural adverse events between the PVI+PWI (3.2%) and PVI (2.8%) groups was low and similar. PVI+PWI needed longer ablation and/or procedural time but had similar fluoroscopy time.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive PWI can be achieved in most patients without compromising safety. Patients with persistent AF appear to benefit from this approach. The ablation technology and/or approach may affect the clinical outcome of PWI.

Ablation index-guided 50W radiofrequency ablation for left atrial posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation

Background

Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation for posterior wall isolation (PWI) using high-power, short-duration remains untested. We sought to evaluate the acute outcomes of AI-guided 50 W ablation vs. conventional ablation, and investigate the differences in relationship between contact force (CF), time and AI in both groups.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing first-time AI-guided ablation with PWI using either 50 W or 35–40 W ablation were enrolled. Acute procedural metrics and individual lesion level ablation data were compared between groups.

Results

40 patients (50 W: n = 20, 35–40 W: n = 20) with atrial fibrillation were included. Total procedure time was significantly reduced with 50 W (120 vs. 143 mins, p = 0.004) and there was a trend toward decreased ablation time (22 vs. 28 mins, p = 0.052). First pass and acute success of PWI were comparable between the 50 W and 35–40 W groups (10 vs. 8 patients, p = 0.525 and 20 vs. 19 patients, p = 1.000, respectively). Individual lesion analysis of all 959 RF applications (50 W: n = 458, 35–40 W: n = 501) demonstrated that 50 W ablation led to lower ablation time per lesion (10.4 vs. 13.0s, p < 0.001), and increased AI (471 vs. 461, p < 0.001) and impedance drop (7.4 vs. 6.9ohms, p = 0.007). Excessive ablations (AI>600 for roof line; AI>500 elsewhere) were more frequently observed in the 50 W group (9.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.007). CF had very good discriminative capability for excessive ablation in both groups. At 50 W, limiting the CF to <10 g reduced the number of excessive ablations on the floor line and within the posterior box to 12% and 4%,respectively. Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

AI-guided 50 W RF ablation reduces the ablation time of individual lesions and total procedure time without compromising first pass and acute success rates of PWI or 12-month outcomes compared to conventional powers.

Efficacy of electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall depends on the existence of left atrial low-voltage zone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Modification of the low-voltage zone in the left atrium (LA-LVZ) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not shown sufficient improvement in arrhythmia-free survival in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Further, the effect of electrical posterior wall isolation (PWI) is controversial. We investigated the impact of existence of LA-LVZ on the outcome of patients undergoing additional PWI for PerAF.

METHODS

A total of 347 patients with PerAF who underwent primary catheter ablation with LA-LVZ based strategy were retrospectively analyzed. Voltage mapping in the left atrium (LA) was performed during sinus rhythm. Additional LVZ ablation was performed in patients with LA-LVZ. The operators decided whether additional PWIs were to be performed.

RESULTS

Of 347 patients, 108 had LA-LVZ. In the LVZ group, patients with additional PWI (N = 70) had higher rates of freedom from tachyarrhythmia recurrence than those without (77.1% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, even when patients were limited to those with LA-LVZ in areas other than the posterior wall (N = 85), PWI had higher success rates (80.9% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients without LVZ (N = 239), there was no significant difference in the rate of successful outcome between those with and without PWI (81.3% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.112). On the other hand, the patients with PWI had greater atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence rate than those without PWI (10.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

PWI, in addition to PVI and LVZ modification, may improve single procedural outcomes in patients with PerAF who have LVZ, regardless of the distribution in the LA. A combination of voltage-guided ablation and PWI may be a simple, tailored, and effective ablation strategy.

Global Substrate Mapping and Targeted Ablation with Novel Gold-tip Catheter in De Novo Persistent AF

Results from catheter ablation for persistent AF are suboptimal, with no strategy other than pulmonary vein isolation showing clear benefit. Recently employed empirical strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation involve widespread atrial ablation in all patients and do not take into account patient-specific differences in AF mechanisms or phenotype. Charge density mapping using the non-contact AcQMap system (Acutus Medical) allows visualisation of whole-chamber activation during AF and reveals localised patterns of complex activation thought to represent important mechanisms for AF maintenance that can be targeted with focal ablation. In this review, the authors outline the fundamentals of this technology, the initial data exploring the mechanistic role of activation patterns seen and the application to ablation of persistent AF.

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is an emerging approach in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, yet its efficacy remains controversial. This is the first meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in AF ablation.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of PWI in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence following initial AF ablation at long‐term follow‐ups when compared to conventional methods.

Methods

We conducted a literature search from inception through September 2021 in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included RCTs that compared outcomes in PWI and conventional approaches of AF ablation. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Eight RCT from 2009 to 2020, including 1024 AF patients, were included. PWI did not decrease overall atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR 0.96, 95% CI:0.88–1.05, I² = 31.6%, p‐value 0.393). However, the pooled analysis showed a significant decrease in AF recurrence in PWI compared to controlled approaches (RR 0.88, 95% CI:0.81–0.96, I² = 48.2%, p‐value .004). In the subgroup analysis, PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in the studies that included only persistent AF (RR = 0.89, 95% CI:0.80–0.98, I² = 65.2%, p‐value .014). PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence when compared to PVI with roof line (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95, I² 0.00%, p‐value .008).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that adding PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to controlled approaches. It highlights the importance of considering PWI during the initial procedure in this patient population.

Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall using cryoballoon ablation improve clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation? A prospective randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) of the left atrium (LA) adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency catheter ablation has shown favourable outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). This study was sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of additional PWI by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) alone in patients with PeAF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent de novo CBA for PeAF (n = 100) were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to the PVI only group and PVI combined with PWI (PVI+PWI) group. Procedural and clinical outcomes were prospectively compared over a 12-month follow-up.

 

Baseline characteristics, including mean AF duration (56.2 ± 43.2 months) and LA size (48.2 ± 7.7 mm), were well-balanced between the groups. Successful PVI was achieved in all patients. In the PVI+PWI group, complete PWI by CBA was achieved in 31 (62%) patients. The LA indwelling and procedure times were significantly longer in the PVI+PWI group. The complication rates were not different between groups. During a mean follow-up of 457.9 ± 61.8 days, the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in the PVI+PWI group than in the PVI only group (24% vs. 46%; P = 0.035). The recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the PVI+PWI group compared with the PVI only group, irrespective of complete PWI (log-rank P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that adjunctive PWI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.255; P = 0.003] and LA size (HR 1.079; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of clinical recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Compared with PVI only, adjunctive PWI achieved exclusively by CBA resulted in better clinical outcomes without increasing complications in patients with PeAF.

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter randomized trial of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) - The CAPLA study

BACKGROUND

The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is reduced in persistent AF (PsAF) compared to paroxysmal AF. Adjunctive ablation strategies have failed to show consistent incremental benefit over PVI alone in randomized studies. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential source of non-PV triggers and atrial substrate which may promote the initiation and maintenance of PsAF. Adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI had shown conflicting outcomes, with earlier studies confounded by methodological limitations.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether combining PWI with PVI significantly improves freedom from AF recurrence, compared to PVI alone, in patients with PsAF.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, prospective, international randomized clinical trial. 338 patients with symptomatic PsAF refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy (AAD) will be randomized to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI in a 1:1 ratio. PVI involves wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, utilizing contact force sensing ablation catheters. PWI involves the creation of a floor line connecting the inferior aspect of the PVs, and a roof line connecting the superior aspect of the PVs. Follow up is for a minimum of 12 months with rhythm monitoring via implantable cardiac device and/or loop monitor, or frequent intermittent monitoring with an ECG device. The primary outcome is freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds off AAD at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized study aims to determine the success and safety of adjunctive PWI to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Contact-Force Guided Posterior Wall Isolation as an Adjunctive Ablation Strategy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still controversial and little is known about the impact of contact-force (CF) technology.

Objective

In this retrospective study, we present our experience with PWI using CF sensing catheters and its efficacy and safety as an adjunctive ablation strategy on top of PVI for management of patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF.

Methods

A total of 73 consecutive patients (20.5% female) affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (10.9% long-standing) underwent PWI as an adjunctive therapy to PVI using CF sensing catheters. Outcomes were reported as incidence of atrial arrhythmic recurrences (ARs) lasting >30 seconds at follow up and in addition, in patients provided with insertable cardiac monitors (ICM), as burden of AF or atrial tachycardias (AT) at relevant time points.

Results

PWI was successfully achieved in 65 (89.0%) patients. Two (2.7%) minor vascular procedural complications were observed. At 1 and 2-year follow-up, ARs free survival was observed in 80.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively with 75.3% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs at the last follow-up. Ten patients underwent repeat ablations during the follow-up. At multivariate analysis, early ARs within 3 months after procedure, were associated with a two-fold increased risk of late ARs at follow-up. Among patients provided with ICM, PWI on top of PVI was able to reduce the mean AT/AF burden of more than 50% compared with pre-ablation time, reporting very low levels (≤ 5%) over 2 years.

Conclusions

In persistent atrial fibrillation, PWI on top of PVI using CF sensing catheters is safe and effective, providing great reduction of burden of ARs. Early ARs are associated with a greater risk of late recurrences.

Outcomes of posterior wall isolation with pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have shown that addition of posterior wall isolation (PWI) may reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. No data on PWI in paroxysmal AF (pAF) patients with normal left atrial voltage is available, to date.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients presenting with pAF and normal left atrial voltage.

METHODS

Consecutive patient registry analysis was performed on all patients with pAF and normal left atrial voltage undergoing initial radiofrequency ablation from November 1, 2018 to November 15, 2019. Primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia including AF, atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL).

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were studied, 214 in the PVI group and 107 in the PWI + PVI group. Recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia occurred in 18.2% of patients in the PVI group and 16.8% in the PVI + PWI cohort (p = 0.58). At 1 year, recurrence was 14.0% in the PVI group and 15.0% in the PWI + PVI group (p = 0.96). There was a lower AT/AFL recurrence in the PVI + PWI group, not reaching significance (3.7% in the PWI + PVI group vs. 7.9% in PVI group, p = 0.31). Need for carina lesions predicted recurrence in the PVI-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of PWI to PVI in pAF patients undergoing their first ablation did not reduce the frequency of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. This warrants further study in a prospective trial.

Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the Treatment of Persistent and Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Recent advances have been made in AF treatment, including the role of early rhythm control and landmark clinical trials using ablation therapy. However, some treatment gaps remain, including the creation of durable lesions outside the pulmonary veins and effective treatment of longstanding persistent AF. A novel epicardial-endocardial ablation approach - the hybrid convergent procedure - was developed to combine surgical and catheter ablation techniques into a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to managing AF. In this review, the authors discuss recently published data on hybrid convergent ablation, including results of the CONVERGE clinical trial, in the context of current challenges to treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent AF. The review also aims to provide perspective on outstanding questions and future directions in this area.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation with defragmentation and linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: the EARNEST-PVI trial

AIMS

Previous studies could not demonstrate any benefit of more intensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation for recurrence in the initial catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus these additional ablation strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n = 512, long-standing persistent AF; 128 cases) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus CFAE and/or linear ablation (PVI-plus group). After excluding 15 cases who did not receive procedures, we analysed 249 and 248 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the non-inferior margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.43. In the PVI-plus group, 85.1% of patients had linear ablation and 15.3% CFAE ablation. After 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint occurred in 71.3% of patients in the PVI-alone group and in 78.3% in the PVI-plus group [hazard ratio = 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.24), non-inferior P = 0.3062]. The procedure-related complication rates were 2.0% in the PVI-alone group and 3.6% in the PVI-plus group (P = 0.199).

CONCLUSION

This randomized trial did not establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus linear ablation or CFAE ablation in patients with persistent AF, but implied that the PVI plus strategy was promising to improve the clinical efficacy (NCT03514693).

Rationale and Outcomes of Cryoballoon Ablation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall in Conjunction with Pulmonary Vein Isolation

There is strong evidence in support of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with concomitant left atrial (LA) posterior wall (PW) isolation (PWI) for the treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). While this may be achieved using surgical and catheter-based strategies, there is growing interest in performing this approach using the cryoballoon. There are several potential advantages to this strategy. First, lesions created using the current-generation cryoballoons are typically large and durable. Second, cryoballoon ablation offers a simple technique to directly ablate and debulk the LAPW. Moreover, some consider cryoenergy a safer modality specifically with regard to collateral structures (ie, the esophagus). Based on the available data, cryoballoon PVI + PWI is associated with greater intraprocedural AF terminations and reductions in long-term AF recurrence (typically by ~20%), as compared to PVI alone in patients with persAF, but with similar rates of adverse events. As such, PVI + PWI has emerged as a significant predictor of freedom from recurrent AF (odds ratio: 3.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-9.34; p = 0.006) as well as all atrial arrhythmias (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-3.61; p = 0.015). Adjunct radiofrequency ablation to complete PWI is required in at least one-third of the patients, and this need is highly predicted by the LA size (significantly increased with an LA diameter > 48 mm). LAPW reconnection also seems to be associated with LA dimension, particularly an LA diameter greater than 48 mm (negative predictive value: 89.7%). Nevertheless, based on the analysis of patients who underwent repeat electrophysiology study for arrhythmia recurrences, cryoballoon PVI + PWI yields acceptable long-term durability (> 80%).

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation and Ablation Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a global disease with rapidly rising incidence and prevalence. It is associated with a higher risk of stroke, dementia, cognitive decline, sudden and cardiovascular death, heart failure and impairment in quality of life. The disease is a major burden on the healthcare system. Paroxysmal AF is typically managed with medications or endocardial catheter ablation to good effect. However, a large proportion of patients with AF have persistent or long-standing persistent AF, which are more complex forms of the condition and thus more difficult to treat. This is in part due to the progressive electro-anatomical changes that occur with AF persistence and the spread of arrhythmogenic triggers and substrates outside of the pulmonary veins. The posterior wall of the left atrium is a common site for these changes and has become a target of ablation strategies to treat these more resistant forms of AF. In this review, we discuss the role of the posterior left atrial wall in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, the limitations of current endocardial-focused treatment strategies, and future perspectives on hybrid epicardial–endocardial approaches to posterior wall isolation or ablation.

The role of posterior wall isolation in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

The left atrial posterior wall has many embryologic, anatomic, and electrophysiologic characteristics, that are important for the initiation and maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential target for ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, a population in whom pulmonary vein isolation alone has resulted in unsatisfactory recurrence rates. Published clinical studies report conflicting results on the safety and efficacy of posterior wall isolation. Emerging technologies including optimized use of radiofrequency ablation, pulse field ablation, and combined endocardial/epicardial ablation may optimize approaches to posterior wall isolation and reduce the risk of injury to nearby structures such as the esophagus. Critical evaluation of future and ongoing clinical studies of posterior wall isolation requires careful scrutiny of many characteristics, including intraprocedural definition of posterior wall isolation, concomitant extrapulmonary vein ablation, and study endpoints.

First-line treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation with single-stage hybrid ablation: a 2-year follow-up study

Aims

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of first-line single-stage hybrid ablation of (long-standing) persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), over a follow-up period of 2 years, and provides additional information on arrhythmia recurrences and electrophysiological findings at repeat ablation.

Methods and results

This is a prospective cohort study that included 49 patients (65% persistent AF; 35% long-standing persistent AF) who underwent hybrid ablation as first-line ablation treatment (no previous endocardial ablation). Patients were relatively young (57.0 ± 8.5 years) and predominantly male (89.8%). Median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 1.0 (0.5; 2.0) and mean left atrium volume index was 43.7 ± 10.9 mL/m². Efficacy was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiography and 72-h Holter monitoring after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Recurrence was defined as AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/tachycardia (AT) recorded by electrocardiography or Holter monitoring lasting >30 s during 2-year follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, single and multiple procedure success rates were 67% and 82%, respectively. Two (4%) patients experienced a major complication (bleeding) requiring intervention following hybrid ablation. Among the 16 (33%) patients who experienced an AF/AFL/AT recurrence, 13 (81%) were ATs/AFLs and only 3 (19%) were AF. Repeat ablation was performed in 10 (20%) patients and resulted in sinus rhythm in 7 (70%) at 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion

First-line single-stage hybrid AF ablation is an effective treatment strategy for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF with an acceptable rate of major complications. Recurrences are predominantly AFL/AT that can be successfully ablated percutaneously. Hybrid ablation seems a feasible approach for first-line ablation of (long-standing) persistent AF.

Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Post-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Esophageal Thermal Injury Across the Spectrum of Severity

Background Esophageal thermal injury (ETI) is a byproduct of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using thermal sources. The most severe form of ETI is represented by atrioesophageal fistula, which has a high mortality rate. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows identification of ETI. Hence, we sought to evaluate the utility of LGE-MRI as a method to identify ETI across the entire spectrum of severity. Methods and Results All AF radiofrequency ablations performed at the University of Utah between January 2009 and December 2017 were reviewed. Patients with LGE-MRI within 24 hours following AF ablation as well as patients who had esophagogastroduodenoscopy in addition to LGE-MRI were identified. An additional patient with atrioesophageal fistula who had AF ablation at a different institution and had MRI and esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the University of Utah was identified. A total of 1269 AF radiofrequency ablations were identified. ETI severity was classified on the basis of esophageal LGE pattern (none, 60.9%; mild, 27.5%; moderate, 9.9%; severe, 1.7%). ETI resolved in most patients who underwent repeat LGE-MRI at 3 months. All patients with esophagogastroduodenoscopy-confirmed ETI had moderate-to-severe LGE 24 hours after ablation MRI. Moderate-to-severe LGE had 100% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity in detecting ETI, and a negative predictive value of 100%. Atrioesophageal fistula was visualized by both computed tomography and LGE-MRI in one patient. Conclusions LGE-MRI is useful in detecting and characterizing ETI across the entire severity spectrum. LGE-MRI exhibits an extremely high sensitivity and negative predictive value in screening for ETI after AF ablation.

Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the Treatment of Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background:

The limited effectiveness of endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment led to the development of a minimally invasive epicardial/endocardial ablation approach (Hybrid Convergent) to achieve a more comprehensive lesion set with durable transmural lesions. The multicenter randomized controlled CONVERGE trial (Convergence of Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent AF) evaluated the safety of Hybrid Convergent and compared its effectiveness to CA for persistent and long-standing persistent AF treatment.

Methods:

One-hundred fifty-three patients were randomized 2:1 to Hybrid Convergent versus CA. Primary effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia absent new/increased dosage of previously failed/intolerant class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs through 12 months. Primary safety was major adverse events through 30 days. CONVERGE permitted left atrium size up to 6 cm and imposed no limits on AF duration, making it the only ablation trial to substantially include long-standing persistent–AF, that is, 42% patients with long-standing persistent–AF.

Results:

Of 149 evaluable patients at 12 months, primary effectiveness was achieved in 67.7% (67/99) patients with Hybrid Convergent and 50.0% (25/50) with CA ( P =0.036) on/off previously failed antiarrhythmic drugs and in 53.5% (53/99) versus 32.0% (16/50; P =0.0128) respectively off antiarrhythmic drugs. At 18 months using 7-day Holter, 74.0% (53/72) Hybrid Convergent and 55% (23/42) CA patients experienced ≥90% AF burden reduction. A total of 2.9% (3/102) patients had primary safety events within 7 days, and 4.9% (5/102) between 8 and 30 days postprocedure. No deaths, cardiac perforations, or atrioesophageal fistulas occurred. All but one primary safety event resolved.

Conclusions:

The Hybrid Convergent procedure has superior effectiveness compared to the CA for the treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01984346.

Optimum lesion set and predictors of outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-regression analysis

AIMS

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) has been performed by many techniques with varying success rates. This may be due to ablation techniques, patient demographics, comorbidities, and trial design. We conducted a meta-regression of studies of PsAF ablation to elucidate the factors affecting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

Databases were searched for prospective studies of PsAF ablation. A meta-regression was performed. Fifty-eight studies (6767 patients) were included. Complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation reduced freedom from AF by 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -15 to -2.3, P = 0.009). Left atrial appendage [LAA isolation (three study arms)] increased freedom from AF by 39.5% (95% CI 9.1-78.4, P = 0.008). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) (eight study arms) increased freedom from AF by 19.4% (95% CI 3.3-38.1, P = 0.017). Linear ablation or ganglionated plexi ablation resulted in no significant effect on freedom from AF. More extensive ablation increased intraprocedural AF termination; however, intraprocedural AF termination was not associated with improved outcomes. Increased left atrial diameter was associated with a reduction in freedom from AF by 4% (95% CI -6.8% to -1.1%, P = 0.007) for every 1 mm increase in diameter.

CONCLUSION 

Linear ablation, PWI, and CFAE ablation improves intraprocedural AF termination, but such termination does not predict better long-term outcomes. Study arms including PWI or LAA isolation in the lesion set were associated with improved outcomes in terms of freedom from AF; however, further randomized trials are required before these can be routinely recommended. Left atrial size is the most important marker of AF chronicity influencing outcomes.

Additional posterior wall isolation is associated with gastric hypomotility in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Gastric hypomotility (GH) is a possible complication of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is unclear which factors are associated with GH. We sought to elucidate the relationship between the CA procedure and GH.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 254 patients who underwent CA for AF from November 2017 to October 2018. Finally, 119 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: with or without GH (GH or non-GH groups). To evaluate the association with GH, the clinical backgrounds and procedure characteristics of the radiofrequency CA (RFCA) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years old with 34% of female. GH were observed in 27.7% of patients who underwent RFCA, which was significantly higher than that in the cohort of patients who underwent esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy during the same time period (1.9%: 151 in 8063 patients, p < 0.0001). According to the detailed RFCA procedure, additional posterior wall isolation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) had a higher prevalence of GH than that with only PVI (54.8% vs. 18.2%; odds ratio 5.46, 95%CI 2.24-13.32, p = 0.0002). After an adjustment using a multivariate logistic analysis, a posterior wall isolation with the PVI was identified as the only independent predictor for GH (odds ratio 5.01, 95%CI 1.94-13.43, p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional posterior wall isolation with PVI was associated with gastric hypomotility.