Percutaneous treatment of aorto-ostial coronary lesions: Current challenges and future directions

Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified left main coronary artery: Procedural success and 1-year clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has an excellent efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of calcified coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data regarding its use on left main (LM) lesions are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the technical success and 1-year clinical outcomes in calcified LM lesions treated with IVL.

METHODS

Patients who underwent IVL from the ongoing prospective BENELUX registry were eligible for inclusion. Patients were divided into LM and non-LM groups based on the anatomical application of the IVL pulses. The primary technical endpoint was technical success, defined as the successful delivery of the IVL catheter across the target lesion, administration of IVL pulses without angiographic complications, and achieving a residual target lesion stenosis of less than 30 %. The primary safety endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

The study included 509 patients (59 LM and 450 non-LM). Patients in the LM group were significantly older (79 years [75-82] vs. 73 years [68-81], p < 0.01). Left ventricular ejection fraction was slightly lower in the LM group (41 % [19-50] vs. 51 % [40-60], p = 0.053). Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices were more frequently used in the LM group, primarily as part of the "protected PCI" strategy (6.8 % in LM vs. 2.1 % in non-LM, p = 0.04). Technical success was comparable between the two groups (93.2 % in LM vs. 89.8 % in non-LM, p = 0.41). Cardiac death, MACE, and target vessel revascularization rates were also comparable at hospital discharge, 30 days, and 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

IVL in calcified LM lesions achieved comparable technical success and long-term clinical outcomes to non-LM lesions.

The Role of IVUS in Coronary Complications

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an essential tool in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of coronary artery disease. In daily practice, IVUS is particularly useful for plaque characterization, optimizing stent implantation, and identifying the cause of in-stent restenosis. In acute coronary syndromes, it helps to detect culprit lesions that are not clearly visible on angiography and plays a key role in the diagnostic algorithm for myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Additionally, IVUS is frequently used in complex and calcified lesions to guide optimal plaque modification strategies and improve procedural and long term outcomes. Beyond these common applications, IVUS is crucial in managing coronary complications, such as coronary dissection, perforation, intramural hematoma, and side-branch occlusion. In these challenging cases, IVUS allows us to overcome some of the limitations of angiography. This review explores the role of IVUS in bail out situations, offering practical tips and techniques for navigating coronary complications and improving procedural success in a safer and more refined manner.

Management of Stent Underexpansion and Aorto-ostial Lesions

Stent underexpansion (SU) and aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) are challenging conditions commonly faced during clinical practice in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions. Compared to other interventional settings, both SU and AOL are associated with an increased risk of immediate and late events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Several specific strategies including the systematic use of intracoronary imaging and dedicated techniques for lesions' preparation and calcium debulking have been described. This narrative review summarises the currently available options for the diagnosis and treatment of both SU and AOL, highlighting the potential benefits and limits of each technique in these specific settings.

Sex related disparities after complex percutaneous coronary interventions

Introduction

Complex Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of ischemic heart disease has increased significantly. We aimed to evaluate sex-related differences in patients undergoing complex PCI.

Methods

single-center prospective observational study including patients undergoing complex PCI between 2017 and 2023. Baseline and procedural features, and mid-term outcomes were compared according to the gender distribution. The combined primary endpoint included stroke, myocardial infarction, need for a new coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Propensity score (PS) matching with an inverse probability of treatment weight (IPW) approach was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

Results

1,283 patients were included, 983 (76.6%) male and 300 (23.4%) female. Median follow-up was 2.4 (IQR: 1-3.8) years. There was a higher rate of no-reflow phenomenon (4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03) among female patients. In the overall cohort, female patients had a greater risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02-1.59). In the matched cohort, female patients exhibited a higher risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.42), as well as for myocardial infarction (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.75), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.45), and a trend towards a higher risk for the need of a new coronary revascularization (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.92-1.61).

Conclusions

in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing complex PCI procedures, female patients are associated with a higher risk of early complications.

Procedural and clinical impact of intracoronary lithotripsy in heavily calcified aorto-ostial coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) pose unique challenges due to anatomical propensity for recoil, leading to poorer outcomes compared to non-AOL. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown excellent success and safety in heavily calcified plaques, evidence specific to AOL is limited. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVL in AOL versus non-AOL.

METHODS

Patients treated with IVL between 2019 and 2023 from an ongoing prospective multicenter registry were eligible for inclusion. Patients were therefore classified in AOL and non-AOL groups, based on anatomical location. The primary technical endpoint was device success, defined as the ability to deliver the IVL catheter and pulses at the target lesion, without angiographic complications. Secondary technical endpoint encompassed procedural success <30%, consisting of device success with residual stenosis <30%, final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow, and no in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The primary clinical endpoint was in-hospital MACE, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients underwent IVL, including 48 with AOL. Device success showed no significant difference between AOL and non-AOL groups (100% vs. 98.2%; p = 0.35). A nonsignificant trend toward worse procedural success with residual stenosis <30% was observed in the AOL arm (AOL 81.3% vs. non-AOL 90.5%, p = 0.06). In-hospital MACE was significantly higher in AOL (4.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.048), attributed entirely to cardiac deaths. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of MACE (AOL 8.3% vs. non-AOL 4.0%, p = 0.19), and cardiac deaths (AOL 4.2% vs non-AOL1.1%, p = 0.11) were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

IVL treatment for heavily calcified AOL demonstrates comparable procedural and 6-month clinical outcomes when compared to non-AOL, despite a higher incidence of in-hospital MACE.

Demystifying the Quandary of Ostial Stenting

Accurate stent placement is known to be hampered by the anatomical nature of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ostial lesions, such as aorta-ostial lesions and Medina 001 bifurcation lesions. The Ostial Pro device, the aorta floating wire technique, the stent pull-back technique, the Szabo (tail-wire) techniques, the marker wire technique, the T-stent and small protrusion technique, the cross-over 1-stent technique, and new dedicated ostial stents are some of the techniques used to achieve perfection in precise ostial stent placement. The current state of knowledge about ostial PCI and novel approaches for optimizing these procedures are compiled in this review.

Management of severe aortic stenosis in the presence of an 8 mm right coronary stent protrusion

Management of a protruding coronary stent into the aortic root in patients undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement can be challenging. We describe a patient treated with stent trimming and surgical aortic valve replacement, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation and selection process in this complex scenario.

Lower revascularization rates after high-speed rotational atherectomy compared to modified balloons in calcified coronary lesions: 5-year outcomes of the randomized PREPARE-CALC trial

BACKGROUND

In the PREPARE-CALC trial, severely calcified lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy (RA) before biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation demonstrated higher procedural success and comparable rates of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss compared to modified balloons (MB) (scoring/cutting). We aimed to analyze the 5-year outcomes of both lesion preparation strategies.

METHODS

PREPARE-CALC randomly assigned 200 patients 1:1 to MB or RA, followed by SES implantation. The principal endpoint of the current analysis was target vessel failure (TVF) at 5 years.

RESULTS

At 5 years, MB had comparable rates of TVF to RA (19% vs. 21%, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.60-2.16, p = 0.687). Subgroup analysis showed a lesion length treatment interaction, favoring MB for short lesions and RA for long ones (p for interaction = 0.042). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was significantly less common with RA (12 vs. 3%, HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, p = 0.048). In a multivariate analysis, RA was independently protective against TLR (adj. HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.78, p = 0.022), while ostial lesions were associated with higher TLR independent of treatment strategy (adj. HR 11.3, 95% CI 2.98-42.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with severely calcified coronary lesions, using MB or RA for lesion preparation followed by biodegradable polymer SES implantation was associated with comparable rates of TVF at 5 years. However, a significant reduction of TLR was observed after RA. PREPARE-CALC is the first randomized trial showing potential clinical advantages of RA over MB during long-term follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov . Unique identifier: NCT02502851.

Consequences and Management of Excessive Ostial Stent Protrusion: A Case Report

Aorto-ostial lesions, especially in the right coronary artery, may be challenging due to their morphological and anatomical features, more so when there is a previous stent which may be protruding. Little is known about the long-term safety of protruding stents and results of re-intervention. Presented here is a case of restenosis of a markedly protruding stent at the right coronary ostium. This case was unusual in its 10-year longevity. Intravascular ultrasound-guided in-stent restenosis intervention using wire bumper technique was performed. Literature review and management are presented.

Orbital atherectomy safety and efficacy: A comparative analysis of ostial versus non-ostial calcified coronary lesions

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of ostial lesions are not yet fully established. We sought to evaluate (OA) treatment of severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of subjects treated with OA for severely calcified ostial and non-ostial lesions, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) from January 2014 to September 2020, was completed. Study baseline characteristics, lesion and vessel characteristics, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients that underwent PCI with OA were identified. The majority of patients (81.9 %) had non-ostial lesions, while 16.6 % had ostial lesions (of which 2.8 % classified as aorto-ostial) and 1.5 % had unknown lesion anatomy. The mean age of the overall cohort was 74.0 ± 9.3 years, and 63.5 % were male. All patients received drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, and the overall freedom from MACE was 98.5 %, with no significant difference observed between the ostial and non-ostial groups. The freedom from cardiac death and MI was also similar between the two groups. There were low rates of bleeding complications and severe angiographic complications, and no persistent slow flow/no reflow was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated no significant differences in in-hospital MACE outcomes between patients with ostial versus non-ostial lesions, indicating that OA is a safe and effective treatment option for both lesion types, including those classified as aorto-ostial.

The everolimus eluting Synergy MegatronTM drug-eluting stent platform: Early outcomes from the European Synergy MegatronTM Implanters' Registry

BACKGROUND

The Synergy MegatronTM is an everolimus-drug eluting stent that may offer advantages in the treatment of aorto-ostial disease and large proximal vessels.

AIMS

To report the short- to medium-term clinical outcomes from the European Synergy MegatronTM Implanters' Registry.

METHODS

This registry was an investigator-initiated study conducted at 14 European centers. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularisation.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-five patients underwent PCI with MegatronTM between 2019 and 2021. Patients were 69 ± 12 years old, 26% had diabetes mellitus, 24% had moderate-severe left ventricular impairment and 59% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. 15% were deemed prohibitively high risk for surgical revascularisation. The target vessel involved the left main stem in 55%, the ostium of the RCA in 13% and was a true bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1) in 50%.  At 1 year, TLF was observed in 40 patients, with 26 (65%) occurring within the first 30 days. The cumulative incidence of TLF was 4.5% at 30 days and 8.6% (95% CI 6.3-11.7) at 1 year. The incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.5% with no late stent thromboses. By multivariate analysis, the strongest independent predictors of TLF were severe left ventricular impairment (HR 3.43, 95% CI: 1.67-6.76, p < 0.001) and a target vessel involving the left main (HR 4.00 95% CI 1.81-10.15 p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the Synergy MegatronTM everolimus eluting stent in a 'real-world' setting shows favorable outcomes at 30 days and 1 year.

Long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention treatment for left main (LM) ostial stenosis.

AIMS

The present study sought to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for adverse events in LM ostial lesions following drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) in a large cohort of an LM registry database.

METHODS

Patients presenting with LM coronary disease from January 2004 to December 2016 at Fuwai Hospital were included. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to identify independent predictors.

RESULTS

Among 4,625 LM patients, 627 (13.6%) patients were identified with LM ostial lesions. There were more female patients in the ostial group (31.3%), compared with the shaft (18.1%) and bifurcation groups (19.9%) (p<0.0001). Among patients with DES implantation, 3-year TVF occurred in 44 patients (7.5%) in the ostial group, which is comparable with the other two groups. Myocardial infarction (MI) was significantly lower in the ostial group (2.0%) compared with the bifurcation group (4.2%) (p=0.02), especially for MI events originating in the LM vessel (p=0.02). For patients with ostial LM disease who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment, procedural complications were an independent risk factor for long-term cardiac death or MI, while a more recent PCI proved to be a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI treatment for ostial LM lesions achieved favourable long-term outcomes, with a similar MI risk compared with the mid-shaft group but a significantly lower risk of MI compared with the distal group.

Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis with Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: Predictors and Current Evidence

Iterations in stent technologies, advances in pharmacotherapy, and awareness of the implications of implantation techniques have markedly reduced the risk of stent failure, both in the form of stent thrombosis (ST) and in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, given the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed worldwide every year, ST and ISR, albeit occurring at a fairly low rate, represent a public health problem even with contemporary DES platforms. The understanding of mechanisms and risk factors for these two PCI complications has been of fundamental importance for the parallel evolution of stent technologies. Risk factors associated with ST and ISR are usually divided into patient-, lesion-, device- and procedure-related. A number of studies have shown how certain risk factors are related to early (1 month) versus late/very late ST (between 1 month and 1 year and >1 year, respectively). However, more research is required to conclusively show the role of time-dependence of risk factors also in the incidence of ISR (early [1 year] or late [>1 year]). A thorough risk assessment is required due to the complex etiology of ST and ISR. The most effective strategy to treat ST and ISR is still to prevent them; hence, it is crucial to identify patient-, lesion-, device- and procedure-related predictors.

Orbital atherectomy of calcified coronary ostial lesions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of calcified ostial lesions.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly being completed in complex patients and lesions. OA is effective for severely calcified coronary lesions; however, there is a dearth of evidence on the use of OA in ostial lesions, especially with long-term outcome data.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent OA of heavily calcified ostial lesions followed by stent implantation from December 2010 to June 2019 at two high-volume PCI centers. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess the primary endpoints of 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year freedom-from (FF) major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization), stroke, and stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients underwent OA to treat heavily calcified ostial coronary lesions. The mean age was 72 years with a high prevalence of diabetes (55%) and heart failure (36%), requiring hemodynamic support (14%). There was high FF angiographic complications (93%), and at 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year, a high FF-MACE (96%, 91%, and 88%), stroke (98%, 96%, and 96%), and ST (100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest real-world experience of coronary OA use in heavily calcified ostial lesions with long-term outcomes over 2 years. The main finding in this retrospective analysis is that, despite the complex patients and lesions included in this analysis, OA appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option for calcified coronary ostial lesions.

Native aorto-ostial coronary lesions on CT coronary angiogram

Aorto-ostial coronary lesions (AOLs) are important to detect due to the high risk of catastrophic consequences. Unfortunately, due to the complexities of these lesions, they may be missed on invasive coronary angiography. Computed tomography coronary angiogram (CTCA) is highly sensitive and specific in detecting AOLs, and has the additional advantage of demonstrating the surrounding anatomy. CTCA is particularly useful when assessing for AOL aetiologies in addition to atherosclerotic disease, e.g.Congenital anomalies, extrinsic Compression, Iatrogenic, Arteritis and Other, such as Thrombus, Embolism, Dissection and Spasm. This gives rise to “CIAO (TEDS)” as a proposed aide-mémoire and will form the structure of this pictorial review.

Determination of optimal fluoroscopic angulations for aorto-coronary ostial interventions from coronary computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND

An optimal aorto-coronary angiographic projection, characterized by an orthogonal visualization of the proximal coronary artery, is crucial for interventional success. We determined the distribution of optimal C-arm positions and assessed their feasibility by invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

Orthogonal aorto-coronary ostial angulations were determined in 310 CT data sets. In 100 patients undergoing subsequent invasive angiography, we assessed if the CT-predicted angulations were achievable by the C-arm system. If the predicted projection was not achievable due to mechanical constraints of the C-arm system, the most close, achievable angulation was determined. Patient characteristics were analyzed regarding the distribution of optimal angulations and its feasibility by the C-arm system.

RESULTS

For the left ostium, CT revealed a mean angulation of LAO 23 ​± ​21°/cranial 25 ​± ​23° (90% of patients with a LAO/cranial angulation, 3% LAO/caudal, 4% RAO/cranial, 3% RAO/caudal) and were achievable by the C-arm system in 87% of patients. For the right ostium, the mean CT-predicted orthogonal angulation was LAO 36 ​± ​37°/cranial 36 ​± ​51° (84% LAO/cranial, 2% LAO/caudal, 14% RAO/caudal) and achievable by the C-arm system in 45% of patients. For the left ostium, a higher body weight was associated with a steeper LAO/cranial angulation being less feasible by the C-arm system due to mechanical constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthogonal aorto-left coronary angulations show a relative narrow distribution predominately in LAO/cranial position whereas a wider range of angulations was found for the right coronary ostium. The feasibility of CT-predicted angulations by the C-arm system is more restricted for the right than the left coronary ostium.

Potential value of guard-wire technology in the interventional treatment for ostial coronary lesions

Background

To explore potential value of guard-wire technology during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ostial coronary lesions.

Methods

Patients, who underwent PCI, were collected between October 2011 and March 2017. Of the 141 patients, 63 (44.7%) have ostial lesions, and 78 (55.3%) have distal bifurcation sites. They were divided into group A (n = 71) and group B (n = 70). Group A received PCI after guard-wire technology. Group B were given balloon dilation and stent after placing guide wire through target lesion vessel. X-ray exposure time, contrast agent dosage, total PCI duration, pressure incarceration times, cases of malignant arrhythmia and cases of failed PCI of all patients were analyzed, respectively.

Results

The general clinical characteristics includes patients age, sex ratio, the proportion of complications, smoking ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction of both groups was not significantly different. X-ray exposure time, contrast agent dosage, PCI total time, stent positioning time, pressure infestation frequency, arrhythmia frequency and complication number of group B were higher than those of group A. There is no case of malignant arrhythmia and case of failed PCI in group A, while there were five malignant arrhythmia and four failed PCI in group B. Contrast agent dosage and cases of failed PCI increased in group B compared with group A.

Conclusion

The guard wire technology is safer and more feasible to patients with ostial coronary lesions who underwent PCI.

Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to define the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations by using 3-dimensional multislice computed tomographic data.

BACKGROUND

Optimal fluoroscopic projections are crucial for coronary imaging and interventions. Historically, coronary fluoroscopic viewing angles were derived empirically from experienced operators.

METHODS

In this analysis, 100 consecutive patients who underwent computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) for suspected coronary artery disease were studied. A CTCA-based method is described to define optimal viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations to guide percutaneous coronary interventions.

RESULTS

The average optimal viewing angle for ostial left main stenting was left anterior oblique (LAO) 37°, cranial (CRA) 22° (95% confidence interval [CI]: LAO 33° to 40°, CRA 19° to 25°) and for ostial right coronary stenting was LAO 79°, CRA 41° (95% CI: LAO 74° to 84°, CRA 37° to 45°). Estimated mean optimal viewing angles for bifurcation stenting were as follows: left main: LAO 0°, caudal (CAU) 49° (95% CI: right anterior oblique [RAO] 8° to LAO 8°, CAU 43° to 54°); left anterior descending with first diagonal branch: LAO 11°, CRA 71° (95% CI: RAO 6° to LAO 27°, CRA 66° to 77°); left circumflex bifurcation with first marginal branch: LAO 24°, CAU 33° (95% CI: LAO 15° to 33°, CAU 25° to 41°); and posterior descending artery and posterolateral branch: LAO 44°, CRA 34° (95% CI: LAO 35° to 52°, CRA 27° to 41°).

CONCLUSIONS

CTCA can suggest optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of coronary artery ostia and bifurcations. As the frequency of use of diagnostic CTCA increases in the future, it has the potential to provide additional information for planning and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention procedures.

Critical coronary artery ostial narrowing and sudden death

Coronary ostial stenosis is an uncommon lesion but one that may be associated with significant and potentially lethal reduction in distal artery blood flow. While most commonly due to atherosclerosis, it may also be caused by aortic arteritis, congenital webs or post-surgical complications following aortic valve replacement. Three cases of lethal ischemic heart disease are reported where occult ostial narrowing/occlusion was first identified at autopsy. Case 1: A 70-year-old man with hypoplasia of the right coronary artery and tunneling of the left anterior descending coronary artery had atherosclerotic obliteration of the right coronary artery ostium. Cases 2 & 3: Two men (aged 80 and 85 years respectively) with marked epicardial coronary artery atherosclerosis also had associated atherosclerotic obliteration of their right coronary artery ostia. Examination of the coronary ostia is an important part of the forensic assessment in cases of sudden death, as isolated occlusive lesions may be the only explanation for a lethal episode. In other cases, as in those reported herein, ostial stenosis/occlusion may be an additional contributing factor to global myocardial ischemia from coronary artery atheroma and/or other causes.

In-Hospital Outcomes After Recanalization of Ostial Chronic Total Occlusions

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. Recanalization of ostial lesions is challenging and complex. This present study aims to evaluate the outcome of patients with ostial and non-ostial CTO-PCI with regard to acute, in-hospital outcome.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018 we included 600 patients. Ostial lesions (OL) were defined as a coronary arterial stenosis within 3 mm of the vessel origin. Antegrade and retrograde CTO-PCI techniques were used and a composite safety endpoint comprising in-hospital death, vascular complications, cardiac tamponade, stroke and acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients were male (82.3%) and the mean age was 62.1 years (±10.3 years). The right coronary artery (RCA) was the most frequent target vessel in 58.5%, followed by the left circumflex artery (LCX) (15.4%) and the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (26.2%). The success (p = .439) and complication rates (p = .169) were independent of the target vessel. We determined that examination and fluoroscopy time were longer in patients with OL (120.7 min vs. 99.0 min, p < .001 and 44.9 min vs. 34.5 min, p < .001) and that in this group of patients the retrograde approach was used more frequent (38.8% vs. 18.2%, p < .001). Overall success rates were lower in OL than compared to NOL (74.6% vs. 86.5%, p = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study suggests that recanalization of ostial CTO lesions is associated with reduced PCI success rates as well as long examination and high fluoroscopy times.

Aorto-Ostial Lesions: Battling an Old Foe

Aorto-ostial lesions (AOLs) entail several diagnostic and treatment challenges. The Flash Ostial System enables flaring of the overhanging stent, optimizing stent deployment in AOLs. Careful planning is essential to achieve optimal stent implantation and avoid early and late complications during the treatment of AOLs.

Procedural outcomes with use of the flash ostial system in aorto-coronary ostial lesions

BACKGROUND

The Flash Ostial system (Ostial Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) was designed to optimize implantation of aorto-ostial coronary stents by flaring the proximal stent struts against the aortic wall.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical record, angiograms, and intravascular ultrasound images of 22 aorto-ostial percutaneous coronary interventions performed at our institution between March and September 2015. The Flash Ostial system was used in 13 cases (59%).

RESULTS

Mean age was 67 ± 8 years and all patients were men. The target vessel was the right coronary artery (59%), left main (27%), or a saphenous vein graft (14%); 59% of the lesions had moderate/severe calcification. The mean number of predilation balloons was 1.8 ± 1.6, mean Flash ostial balloon diameter was 3.3 ± 0.5 mm and mean inflation pressure was 13.1 ± 4.0 atmospheres. Intravascular ultrasonography (available for 19 patients) revealed mean ostial minimum lumen cross-sectional area (MLA) of 9.2 ± 3.0 mm² and reference MLA of 8.5 ± 2.7 mm² . The percent difference between ostial and reference MLA was higher in cases in which the Flash Ostial system was used versus those where it was not (9.6 ± 5.5% vs. 4.0 ± 2.8%, P = 0.03). All stent struts were well apposed. Technical success was 100%. One patient developed a left groin pseudoaneurysm treated with thrombin injection and one patient had a periprocedural myocardial infarction. Median contrast, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time were 235 mL, 33 min, and 118 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Flash Ostial system can be successfully used in aorto-ostial stenting, resulting in large ostial vessel MLA. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Optimal Revascularization Strategy on Medina 0,1,0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes

Aim. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The implications of a diagnosis of DM are as severe as the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. For many patients with complex coronary artery disease, optimal revascularization strategy selection and optimal medical therapy are equally important. In this study, we compared the hemodynamic results of different stenting techniques for Medina 0,1,0 left main bifurcation lesions. Methods. We use idealized left main bifurcation models and computational fluid dynamics analysis to evaluate hemodynamic parameters which are known to affect the risk of restenosis and thrombosis at stented bifurcation. The surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) at bifurcation site were quantified. Results. Crossover stenting without final kissing balloon angioplasty provided the most favorable hemodynamic results (integrated values of TAWSS = 2.96 × 10^-4 N, OSI = 4.75 × 10^-6 m²) with bifurcation area subjected to OSI values >0.25, >0.35, and >0.45 calculated as 0.39 mm², 0.06 mm², and 0 mm², respectively. Conclusion. Crossover stenting only offers hemodynamic advantages over other stenting techniques for Medina 0,1,0 left main bifurcation lesions and large bifurcation angle is associated with unfavorable flow profiles.