Ten-year Durability, Hemodynamic Performance, and Clinical Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-expanding Device

INTRODUCTION

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to low-risk and younger patients has increased the relevance of the long-term durability of transcatheter heart valves (THV). The present study aims to assess the 10-year durability, hemodynamic performance, and clinical outcomes after TAVI using the CoreValve system.

METHODS

An analysis from a prospective registry with predefined clinical and echocardiographic follow-up included 302 patients who underwent TAVI with the CoreValve system between 2007 and 2015. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was defined as any bioprosthetic valve dysfunction-related death, re-intervention, or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration.

RESULTS

At the time of TAVI, the mean age was 80.41 ± 7.01 years, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 6.13 ± 5.23%. At latest follow-up (median [IQR]: 5 [2-7] years), cumulative all-cause mortality rates at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years was 23.7%, 40%, 65.8%, and 89.8%, respectively. Mean aortic valve area and transvalvular gradient post-TAVI and at 5, 7, and 10 years were 1.94, 1.87, 1.69, and 1.98 cm2 (p = 0.236) and 8.3, 9.0, 8.2, and 10.1 mmHg (p = 0.796), respectively. Overall, 11 patients had BVF, of whom six had structural valve deterioration (SVD). The 10-year actual and actuarial freedom from BVF was 96.1% and 78.8%, and from SVD was 97.9% and 80.9%, respectively. Three patients developed significant non-SVD due to severe paravalvular leakage, and two patients were diagnosed with infective endocarditis.

CONCLUSION

Using an early-generation self-expanding bioprosthesis, we documented durable hemodynamic performance and low rates of BVF and SVD up to 10 years after TAVI.

LAA occlusion is effective and safe in very high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke: results from the multicentre German LAARGE registry

BACKGROUND

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) mitigates the risk of thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). Patients with prior stroke have a relevantly increased risk of recurrent stroke, so the effectiveness of LAAO could be reduced in this specific very high-risk patient group.

AIM

This sub-study of the LAARGE registry investigates the effectiveness and safety of LAAO for secondary prevention in nonvalvular AF patients with a history of stroke.

METHODS

LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomised registry on the clinical reality of LAAO. The current sub-study employs data from index procedure and 1-year follow-up. Effectiveness and safety were assessed by documentation of all-cause mortality, non-fatal thromboembolism, procedure-related complications, and bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 638 patients were consecutively included from 38 hospitals in Germany and divided into two groups: 137 patients with a history of stroke (21.5%) and 501 patients without. Successful implantation was consistent between both groups (98.5% vs. 97.4%, p = NS), while peri-procedural MACCE and other complications were rare (0% vs. 0.6% and 4.4% vs. 4.0%, respectively; each p = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimate showed no significant difference in primary effectiveness outcome measure (freedom from all-cause death or non-fatal stroke) between both groups at follow-up (87.8% vs. 87.7%, p = NS). The incidence of transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism at follow-up was low (0% vs. 0.5% and 0.9% vs. 0%, respectively; each p = NS). Severe bleeding events after hospital discharge were rare (0% vs. 0.7%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior stroke demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profile for LAAO as compared to patients without prior stroke. LAAO could serve as a feasible alternative to OAC for secondary stroke prevention in this selected group of nonvalvular AF patients.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02230748.

Predictors of long-term adverse outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion intervention: physiology or morphology?

BACKGROUND

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and target-vessel SYNTAX score (tvSS) are novel indices used to assess lesion physiology and morphology in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Their prognostic implication after successful recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic value of QFR measured immediately after successful CTO-recanalization in predicting vessel-oriented adverse events, and to compare it with the pre-procedural morphological tvSS.

METHODS

QFR was measured offline after successful CTO-PCIs in a single center. We grouped the patients according to a cut-off value of post-PCI QFR (0.91). The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years.

RESULTS

Among 470 CTO lesions performed during the study period, 324 were eligible for QFR analysis (258 with QFR ≥ 0.91 and 66 with QFR < 0.91). The mean age of the study population was 68.3 ± 10.7 years. The low QFR group had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45.8 ± 13.9% vs. 49.8 ± 12.4%, p = 0.025) and a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (19.7% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.020). The mean tvSS was 12.8 ± 4.8, and it showed no significant difference in both groups (13.6 ± 5.1 vs. 12.6 ± 4.6, p = 0.122). Patients with low post-CTO QFR had a trend to develop more TVF at 2 years (21.2% vs. 12.4%, HR 1.74; 95% CI 0.93-3.25, p = 0.086). Low post-CTO QFR failed to predict 2-year TVF (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 0.85-3.29, p = 0.136), while pre-procedural tvSS was an independent predictor for 2-year TVF (aHR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

We found a limited prognostic value of immediate physiological assessment using QFR after successful CTO intervention. Pre-procedure morphological characteristics of CTO lesions using tvSS can play a role in predicting long-term adverse events.

Association of atrial myopathy in mitral valve disease on safety outcomes in left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) are multi-morbid, including mitral valve disease (MVD) which is associated with anatomic changes of the left atrium (LA). This study aims to identify how atrial myopathy in MVD influences outcomes in LAAO.

METHODS

Atrial myopathy in MVD was defined as LA diameter > 45 mm (♀) and > 48 mm (♂) and existing MVD or history of surgical/interventional treatment. Patients were compared with controls from the prospective, multicentre LAArge registry of LAAO.

RESULTS

A total of 528 patients (52 MVD, 476 no-MVD) were included. The MVD group was significantly more likely to be older (78.2 years vs 75.9 years, p = 0.036) and female (59.6% vs 37.8%, p = 0.002). Altered LA anatomy was observed in MVD with significantly larger LA diameter (53 mm vs. 48 mm, p < 0.001) and LAA Ostia [at 135° 23.0 mm (20.5, 26.0) vs 20.0 mm (18.0, 23.0), p = 0.002]. Implant success was high with 96.2% and 97.9%, respectively, without differences in severe complications (7.7% vs 4.6%, p = 0.31). One-year mortality (17.8% vs 11.5%, p = 0.19) and a combined outcome of death, stroke, and systemic embolism (20.3% vs 12.4%, p = 0.13) were not different. Independent predictors of the combined outcome were peripheral artery disease (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.46-3.98, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (HR 3.46, 95% CI 2.02-5.93, p < 0.001) but not MVD and atrial myopathy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MVD present with altered LA anatomy with increased LA and LAA diameter. However, procedural success and safety in LAAO are not compromised. One-year mortality is numerically higher in patients with MVD but driven by comorbidities.

Sex-specific Inequalities in the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Sub-analysis of the PREPARE-CALC Trial

Background: Coronary vessels in women may have anatomical and histological particularities. The aim of this study was to investigate sex-specific characteristics and outcomes of patients with calcified coronary arteries in the Prepare-CALC (Comparison of Strategies to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions) trial. Methods: The Prepare-CALC trial randomised patients with severe coronary calcification to coronary lesion preparation either using modified balloons (MB; cutting or scoring) or rotational atherectomy (RA). Results: Of 200 randomised patients, 24% were women. Strategy success in general was similar between women (93.8%) and men (88.2%; p=0.27). For men, strategy success was significantly more common with an RA-based strategy than an MB-based strategy (98.7% in the RA group versus 77.3% in the MB group, p<0.001), whereas for women there was no evidence of a significant difference in strategy success between RA and MB (95.7% in the RA group versus 92% in the MB group, p>0.99, p for interaction between sex and treatment strategy=0.03). Overall, significant complications such as death, MI, stent thrombosis, bypass operation and perforations were rare and did not differ significantly by gender or treatment strategy. Plaque rupture and disrupted calcified nodules were more common in women. Conclusion: In a well-defined patient population with severely calcified coronary arteries, lesion preparation with an RA-strategy was superior to an MB-strategy in men. For women, both RA and MB strategies appear to have a similar success rate, although definitive conclusions are limited due to the small number of women in the trial.

Combined rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon angioplasty prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions: The PREPARE-CALC-COMBO study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lesion preparation using rotational atherectomy (RA) with consecutive cutting balloon angioplasty (Rota-Cut).

BACKGROUND

Whether the Rota-Cut combination improves stent performance in severely calcified coronary lesions is unknown.

METHODS

PREPARE-CALC-COMBO is a single-arm prospective trial in which 110 patients were treated with a Rota-Cut strategy before implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents and compared with patients treated with modified balloon (MB, scoring or cutting) or RA from a historical cohort (the randomized PREPARE-CALC trial). The study had two primary endpoints: in-stent acute lumen gain (ALG) by quantitative angiographic analysis and stent expansion (SE) on optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

In-stent ALG was significantly higher with Rota-Cut compared to RA or MB alone (1.92 ± 0.45 mm vs. 1.74 ± 0.45 mm with MB vs. 1.70 ± 0.42 mm with RA; p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). SE was comparable between groups (75.1 ± 13.8% vs. 73.5 ± 13.3 with MB vs. 73.1 ± 12.2 with RA; p = 0.19 and p = 0.39, respectively). The Rota-Cut combination resulted in higher minimal stent area (MSA) (7.1 ± 2.2mm² vs. 6.1 ± 1.7mm²  with MB vs. 6.2 ± 1.9mm² with RA; p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). In-hospital death occurred in one patient. Target vessel failure at 9 months was low and comparable between groups (8.2% vs. 8% with MB vs. 6% with RA; p = 1 and p = 0.79, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Rota-Cut combination resulted in higher ALG and larger MSA compared with historical control of RA or MB alone, but was not associated with higher SE. Despite extensive lesion preparation, this strategy is safe, feasible, and associated with favorable clinical outcome at 9 months.

Angiographic predictors of unplanned rotational atherectomy in complex calcified coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the randomised ROTAXUS and PREPARE-CALC trials

BACKGROUND

Calcified coronary lesions present therapeutic challenges for the interventional cardiologist, often requiring rotational atherectomy (RA).

AIMS

This study aimed to develop an angiographic scoring tool to predict the need for a priori RA.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of the randomised ROTAXUS and PREPARE-CALC studies was carried out, (N=220 patients, N=313 lesions), by virtue of the fact that both studies made provision for crossover to RA (from balloon dilatation or modified balloon dilatation, respectively). Logistical regression techniques were employed to assess for the presence of patient- or lesion-specific factors leading to a necessity for RA. External validation was performed though retrospective calculation of the score for 192 patients who underwent bail-out RA in a single centre.

RESULTS

Lesion length (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.04 per mm, p=0.04), bifurcation lesion (OR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.27-5.30, p=0.009), vessel tortuosity >45° (OR 3.49, 95% CI: 1.73-7.03, p<0.001) and severe vessel calcification (OR 11.60, 95% CI: 3.40-39.64, p<0.001) were predictive of the need for RA in multivariate analysis. Based on the regression coefficients, a scoring system was devised. The greater the score, the more likely a lesion required RA. The scoring system performed well in the external validation cohort, with 78% of patients crossing over having a score of greater than the proposed cut-off of 3.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide an angiographic scoring tool to support the expeditious use of time and resources, allowing assessment of the likelihood of success of a balloon-based strategy, or the necessity for RA.

Adverse events and stroke prevention by interventional left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with low CHA2 DS2 -VASc score-results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

BACKGROUND

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is routinely performed in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to standard anticoagulation.

AIMS

We investigated its role in patients at low stroke risk, and compared the effectiveness and safety in patients with low versus high risk.

METHODS

LAARGE is a prospective registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAO. LAAO was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was 1 year. Patients with started procedure and documented CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score were selected from the whole database.

RESULTS

A total of 638 patients from 38 centers were divided into CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score ≤2, i.e., low-risk group (10.2%), and >2, i.e., high-risk group (89.8%). The latter had a pronounced cardiovascular risk profile and preceding strokes (0% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.6%), frequencies of intrahospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (0% vs. 0.5%) and other major complications (4.6% vs. 4.0%) were low (each p = not significant [NS]). Numerous moderate complications were also observed in the low-risk patients (12.3% vs. 9.4%; p = NS). Frequencies of nonfatal strokes (0% vs. 0.7%) and severe bleedings (0% vs. 0.7%) were low (each p = NS). In a specig analysis, patients at very high risk of stroke (i.e., CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score >4) did not have increased rates of complications or nonfatal strokes in the first year after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-risk patients had no nonfatal strokes and major bleedings within 1 year after hospital discha but had unexpectedly high rates of moderate procedural complications. The indication in these patients should be strictly defined based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.

Interventional treatment of para-valvular leaks after prosthetic valve replacement with plug devices -first results from a prospective registry

Background

Interventional closure of symptomatic paravalvular leaks (PVL) after surgical or interventional valve replacement by plug implantation has emerged as an alternative to surgical correction, which is associated with high morbitity and mortality rates. To date, data on procedural efficacy and clinical outcome after transcatheter closure with plugs is sparse, especially prospective data are missing.

Methods

We analysed data from a multi-center prospective registry on interventional PVL closure with plug devices.

Results

Between 06/2012 and 04/2020 55 interventions were performed with different numbers of plugs (maximal 4) in 51 patients at 9 hospitals. Interventions were performed in 15 women and 36 men at high surgical risk for repeat surgery. 48% of procedures were performed for mitral PVLs and 52% procedures were performed for aortic PVLs. Mean age of the population treated was 69±13 years and mean log. Euro-Score I was 22.5±14.2%. Patients were treated by implantation of Amplatzer Vascular Plug III (80%) and Occlutec occluders (9%). Aortic PVLs were treated using a retrograde transfemoral access, mitral PVLs were treated using either a transseptal (25/26) or transapical access (1/26) with 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Indication for PVL closure was previous surgery (n=39), high-risk patients (n=24), heart failure (n=22), age (n=20) and hemolysis (n=12). 40 patients had NYHA class III/IV at admission. Interventional closure of PVL was completely successful in 40 procedures (73%), partially successful in 7 procedures (13%) and failed in 7 procedures (13%). NYHA class I/II after PVL closure was achieved in 75% patients. However, 8 out of 12 patients with hemolysis as indication still hemolyzed at discharge. Complications occurred in 16% of patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 4% of procedures (2/51). After hospital discharge no death occurred during 30-day follow-up.

Conclusions

In this prospective interventional PVL registry inclusion rate was lower than expected. There was an equal distribution of aortal and mitral PVLs. At least partial success could be achieved in 86% of patients, with significant functional improvement in most patients. In this high risk population hospital mortaliy was low (4%), indicating that interventional PVL treatment should be the treatment of choice, when discussed by a heart team.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Interventional occlusion of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation. Gender-related outcomes in the German LAARGE Registry

INTRODUCTION

Gender-based differences in atrial fibrillation have been identified, but limited data exist for patients undergoing left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) implantation. This study reports gender-related periprocedural and 1-year outcomes of the prospective, multicenter German left atrial appendage occlusion registry (LAARGE).

METHODS

LAARGE enrolled 641 patients who were scheduled for LAAO implantation from July 2014 to January 2016 in 38 hospitals in Germany. The data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, details of implantation, and outcome. Efficacy and safety at 1-year follow-up were assessed by the occurrence of thrombembolic and bleeding events, as well as mortality.

RESULTS

Of 638 patients undergoing LAAO implantation 38.9% were female and 61.1% male. Females were older (76.4 ± 8.2 [females] vs. 75.6 ± 7.7 [males], p = .042) and had a higher stroke risk (CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score: 4.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.5, p < .001). In contrast, males suffered more often from coronary artery (33.1% vs. 53.8%, p < .001) and vascular disease (18.5% vs. 31.0%, p < .001). Technical success was high and similar for both genders (98.4% vs. 97.2%, p = .33). Severe periprocedural complications (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = .032) occurred more often in females. At 1-year follow-up the rates of all-cause stroke (0.5% vs. 1.3%, p = .65) and severe bleeding (0.0% and 1.0%, p = .29) were low and comparable between the genders. Also, one-year all-cause mortality (9.2% vs. 13.1%, p = .14) did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

LAARGE documented in this elderly patient population undergoing LAAO implantation a higher rate of severe periprocedural complications in females. At 1-year follow-up similar efficacy and safety outcomes were observed for both genders.

WATCHMAN versus ACP or amulet for left atrial appendage closure. Results from the LAARGE registry

Background

Several left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available and due to differences in device design safety and efficacy of specific occluders derived from trials cannot be simply generalized to all devices.

Purpose

The present analysis sought to assess two contemporary LAA closure devices in clinical practice.

Methods

The present work represents a non-randomized sub-analysis of the prospective, multicenter, Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Register - GErmany (LAARGE) registry. The WATCHMAN (group 1) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amulet occluder (group 2) were assessed regarding technical success and procedural safety.

Results

A total of 641 patients at 38 centers were enrolled. Of them, 278 (43%) and 340 (53%) patients received the WATCHMAN and ACP/Amulet occluder, respectively. High technical success was achieved with a slight difference between the groups (96% in group 1 vs. 99% in group 2; p=0.007). Procedural safety did not differ (98% in group 1 vs. 97% in group 2; p=0.55). Chicken wing morphology of the LAA seemed to trigger the use of the ACP/Amulet (chicken wing in 36% of the cases in group 1 vs. 55% in group 2; p&lt;0.001). The Kaplan Meier estimated 1-year composite of death or stroke was 12.0% and 12.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). The respective rates for the composite endpoint of death, stroke or systemic embolism were 12.0% and 13.2% (Figure 1B).

Conclusions

Both the WATCHMAN and the ACP/Amulet occluder provide excellent procedural results with comparable implantation success and no differences regarding procedural safety and long-term effectiveness.

Figure 1. Composite endpoints at 1-year

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF)

Left atrial appendage closure in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

Background

Interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) effectively prevents thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients. Impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases not only the thromboembolic risk but also the complication rates of cardiac interventions. The LAAC procedure’s benefit in patients with an impaired LVEF, therefore, has yet to be investigated.

Methods

LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomized registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAC in Germany. Procedure was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was one year. In the sense of an as-treated analysis, patients with started procedure and documented LVEF were selected from the whole database.

Results

619 patients from 37 centers were categorized into one of three groups: LVEF > 55% (56%), 36–55% (36%), and ≤ 35% (8%). Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity increased with LVEF reduction (p < 0.001 for trend). CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4.3, 4.8, and 5.1 (p < 0.001), and HAS-BLED score was 3.7, 4.1, and 4.2 (p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.9%), rates of intra-hospital MACCE (0.5%), and other major complications (4.2%) were low (each p = NS). Kaplan–Meier estimation showed a decrease in survival free of stroke with LVEF reduction during one-year follow-up (89.3 vs. 87.0 vs. 79.8%; p = 0.067), a trend which was no longer evident after adjustment for relevant confounding factors. Rates of non-fatal strokes (0.4 vs. 1.1 vs. 0%) and severe bleedings (0.7 vs. 0.0 vs. 3.1%) were consistently low across all groups (each p = NS).

Conclusions

LVEF reduction neither influenced the procedural success nor the effectiveness and safety of stroke prevention by LAAC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02230748

Graphic abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01627-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Interventional occlusion of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acute and long-term outcome of occluder implantation in the LAARGE Registry

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) implantation is an alternative method for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation. The present paper describes the acute and 1-year follow-up outcome data of the prospective, multicenter German left atrial appendage occlusion registry (LAARGE).

METHODS

LAARGE enrolled 641 patients who were scheduled for LAAO implantation. The data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, procedure indication, details of implantation, and outcome; patients were followed at 1-year post-implant. Efficacy and safety during follow-up are assessed by the occurrence of thrombembolic and bleeding events, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 641 consecutive patients (mean age: 75.9 ± 8.0) were enrolled from July 2014 to January 2016 in 38 hospitals in Germany. Patient demographics represent a critically-ill population with a calculated mean CHA2DS2-VASc score and HASBLED score of 4.5 and 3.9, respectively, with bleeding events as the main indication for LAAO implantation (79.4%). One-year all-cause mortality post-procedure was 11.5% with a non-fatal stroke/TIA rate of 1.3% (8 patients) and a rate of major bleeding of 1.6% (10 patients). The anticoagulation regimen after 1 year consisted of oral anticoagulation in 5.5% of patients and an antiplatelet therapy (APT) rate of 84.1% (majority single APT with ASS (74.5%), dual APT in 6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

LAARGE, a prospective multicenter real-world and all-comer registry, is unique in its concept, as it is non-manufacturer sponsored and includes all commercially available devices. LAAO implantation is mainly performed in elderly, critically-ill patients with a history of bleeding. LAARGE demonstrates a favorable outcome at 1-year follow-up in terms of stroke/TIA (1.3%) and major bleeding (1.6%) while using a single APT in the vast majority of patients.

P3727Left atrial appendage closure in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the prospective multicenter German LAARGE registry

Background and purpose

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with increased thromboembolic risk and contraindications for standard oral anticoagulation (OAC) can profit from an interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). While impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with an increased thromboembolic risk in AF patients, cardiac interventions are often associated with an increase in complications in this patient population, and, therefore, the LAAC procedure's success and benefit has yet to be investigated in this subgroup.

Methods

This prospective, observational LAAC registry included 622 patients with documented LVEF from 37 German centers between April 2014 and January 2016. Patients were categorized into one of three groups: LVEF >55% (preserved; p), LVEF 35–55% (mid-range; mr) and LVEF <35% (reduced; r). Procedure was conducted in a standard fashion, and baseline characteristics, imaging as well as procedural data, intra-hospital and one-year follow-up outcome were registered for each group.

Results

55.3% of patients had a pLVEF, 38.7% a mrLVEF and 5.9% a rLVEF. Patients with rLVEF were more often affected by coronary artery disease (p<0.001 for trend), and had an elevated CHA2DS2-VASc (4.3±1.5 vs. 4.8±1.5 vs. 5.3±1.6; p<0.001) and HAS-BLED score (3.7±1.1 vs. 4.1±1.2 vs. 4.3±0.9; p<0.001). Percentage of prior cerebrovascular events and major bleedings was comparable at baseline (each p=n.s.). Procedural success was high (97.9%), while rates of intra-hospital MACCE (0.5%) and other major complications (4.2%) were low, with no significant difference between the groups (each p=n.s.). MACCE during follow-up was more frequent in rLVEF patients (11.0 vs. 11.3 vs. 27.8%; p=0.013), which was mainly driven by myocardial infarctions and all-cause deaths in this high risk collective. Likewise, Kaplan-Meier estimation showed a lower overall survival in this group (89.7 vs. 89.3 vs. 74.6%; p<0.01). On the contrary, rates of stroke were extremely low across all groups and statistically similar (0.3 vs. 1.0 vs. 0%; p=n.s.). This was 93.4, 82.7 and 100.0% less in comparison to the estimated risk calculated from the CHA2DS2-VASc score

Conclusions

The LVEF had no influence on the procedural success as well as the intra-hospital complications after LAAC. Annual rate of stroke was low across all groups, and risk reduction was substantial especially in this high risk collective, as compared to the estimated risk.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany

Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on indication and procedural outcome after interventional occlusion: results from the prospective multicentre German LAARGE registry

AIMS

Interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an emerging alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) in concomitance with a contraindication for standard OAC. This sub-analysis of the LAARGE registry aimed to investigate differences between different LAA morphologies in a real-world setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicentre, observational registry included 562 patients from 37 centres with ineligibility for long-term OAC between April 2014 and January 2016. Baseline characteristics, indications, procedural data and complications were registered according to each LAA morphology (i.e., chicken wing, cauliflower, windsock, cactus and atypical morphologies). Implantation success was high across the four typical anatomies (≥97.5%, p=n.s.); only atypical anatomies exhibited a lower success rate (94%). The cactus-shaped LAA was linked to a trend indicating a shorter fluoroscopy time, while the atypical LAA was linked to a significantly prolonged fluoroscopy time (p=0.089 and p=0.025 versus the overall mean, respectively). Periprocedural and intra-hospital complications were generally rare, with no differences among the different morphologies (p=n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural success as well as the complication rates of LAAC were not different among the four typical LAA morphologies. A lower implantation success rate was only obvious in patients with atypical LAA morphologies.

Impact of High Cost Anticancer Drugs´ Indications Throughout Time in Noncurative Advanced (Stage IV) Cancer Patients With Solid Tumors

Background: Most high cost anticancer drugs (HCAD) are indicated in noncurative advanced (stage IV) cancer patients (NCP) for palliative reasons with variable impacts on quality of life and survival. HCAD challenge health care systems because of their high prices specially in nonhigh income countries. Aim: To evaluate the proportional impact (HDCA indications/overall survival) in NCP throughout years. To analyze causes of HDCA discontinuation. To calculate time elapsed from end of HCDA treatment to end of life (ETEL index). Methods: We reviewed charts of 268 NCP treated in a Patagonian cancer institution between 2009 to 2017 with an HCDA (either alone or in combinations) according to standard of care. Mean age was 58 y (26-84), sex (m/f) 126/142, primary tumor: GI 106 (40%), GU 27 (10%), GYN 20 (7%), BR 58 (22%), LG 43 (16%), others 14 (5%). 29 different HCAD were indicated in 402 treatments (small targets therapies 35%, Moabs 60%, others 5%): 1st line 268 (100%), 2nd line 89 (33%), 3rd line 34 (13%), thereafter 11 (4%). Results: Median OS for the entire population was 26 m (1-120), while it was: GI 20 m, GU 28 m, GYN 27 m, BR 47 m, LG 18 m, Others 21 m. Proportion of OS with HCAD indications: 50% (1-100) in the whole population, while it was: GI 49% (25-100), GU 62% (5-100), GYN 39% (6-93), BR 50% (3-100), LU 45% (6-93), others 61% (25-100). HDAC indications increased over time: 26% (2009-11), 33% (2012-14), 40% (2015-17), with a more than 2% of new NCP increment per year. Additionally proportion (HCAD/OS) was: 43% (2009-11), 47% (2012-14), 52% (2015-17). Median time of HCAD according to line of therapy was: 1st line 6 m, 2nd line 4 m, 3rd line 6 m, 4th+ lines 4.5 m. Causes of discontinuation of HCAD were: disease progression in 87% of cases and 13% for toxicity/others. Median ETEL index (days) was 80 d (1-340). Conclusion: 1) HCAD are indicated during a significant proportion of life (50%) in stage IV NCP with many solid tumors. 2) Its use is increasing over years with a rate of 2% of NCP per year and for more proportion of time. 3) A great number of HCAD treatments are discontinued due to failure reasons, while it is expected more than 10% of adverse events causes. 4) ETEL index is proposed as a measurement indicator of GCP. 5) Impact of HCAD treatments is a major issue in health care policies.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: periprocedural and early clinical/echocardiographic data from a global prospective observational study

AIMS

The global, prospective AMPLATZER Amulet observational study documents real-world periprocedural, transoesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) and clinical outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the AMPLATZER Amulet device. The aim of this report is to describe the periprocedural and early clinical/TEE results from this study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre prospective real-world registry included 1,088 patients (75±8.5 years, 64.5% male, CHA2DS2-VASc: 4.2±1.6, HAS-BLED: 3.3±1.1) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation; 82.8% of patients were considered to have an absolute or relative contraindication to long-term anticoagulation and 72.4% had had a previous major bleeding. Periprocedural results, clinical outcomes up to the first three months and the available TEE results from the first scheduled follow-up (one to three months post implant) are reported. Successful device implantation was achieved in 99.0% of patients. During the procedure and index hospitalisation, major adverse events occurred in 3.2% of patients. Patients were discharged on a single antiplatelet agent (23.0%), dual antiplatelets (54.3%) or an oral anticoagulant (18.9%). TEE follow-up 67±23 days post procedure in 673 patients showed adequate (<3 mm jet) occlusion of the appendage in 98.2% of patients and device thrombus in 10 patients (1.5%), as evaluated by core laboratory analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This large real-world prospective registry of catheter-based LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet device reports a high implant success rate and a low periprocedural complication rate in a population with a high risk of stroke and bleeding. Transoesophageal echo data confirm good closure rates during follow-up and low rates of device-associated thrombus.

Impact of Preprocedural Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on 1-Year Outcomes After MitraClip Implantation (from the ACCESS-EU Phase I, a Prospective, Multicenter, Nonrandomized Postapproval Study of the MitraClip Therapy in Europe)

This report describes the 12-month outcomes of the a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe (ACCESS-EU postapproval study of MitraClip therapy) with respect to preprocedural left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Transcatheter deployment of the MitraClip device may be considered for patients who are not suitable for conventional surgery. A total of 567 patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) underwent MitraClip therapy. Of those, 393 had functional MR (FMR) and were subdivided by preprocedural LVEF (A: 10% to 20%, B: >20% to 30%, C: >30% to 40%, D: >40%). Procedural safety and efficacy and treatment outcomes including MR grade, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 6-minute walk test, and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire were analyzed at baseline, 30 days, and 12 months. Baseline mean logistic EuroSCORE was 25 ± 19; 87% of patients were in NYHA classes III or IV (A: 96%, B: 83%, C: 90%, D: 86%). There was no incidence of death or stroke intraprocedurally. Eleven patients died within 30 days with no differences among subgroups. Kaplan-Meier survival at 12 months was 81.8% (A: 71%, B: 79%, C: 87%, D: 86%). There was a significant improvement in MR severity at 30 days and 12 months (p <0.0001). At 12 months, all subgroups experienced similar improvements in NYHA class, 6-minute walk test, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. This real-world registry reports promising results of MitraClip therapy in patients with FMR. In conclusion, the low rates of hospital mortality and adverse events in patients with FMR-even in patients with severely reduced LVEF-provide additional evidence of substantial benefits after MitraClip implantation.

Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug in Very High Stroke and Bleeding Risk Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Limited data exist on the outcomes after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug (ACP; St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with very high stroke and bleeding risks, the subset expected to benefit most from this procedure. The objective of this study was to report clinical outcomes after LAAC with the ACP device in a very high stroke and bleeding risk cohort of patients with non-valvular AF and contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC).

Methods

LAAC using the ACP device was performed in 96 patients with AF who had median CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores of 5 and 3, respectively. Post-procedure, patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was scheduled at 6 months.

Results

Procedural success was 100%. Procedural-related complications occurred in 7.3% (pericardial effusion, 4.2%; thromboembolic events, 2.1%; device embolization, 1.0%). Additional thromboembolic events occurred in three patients during follow-up (92.7% follow-up). After 93.4 patient-years of follow-up, the annual rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events were 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively. In those with TEE follow-up (70%), complete LAAC with no leaks was observed. Thrombus formation on the device was noted on TEE in two patients.

Conclusion

LAAC using the ACP device was associated with an acceptable low rate of embolic and bleeding events after a median follow-up of 9 months in a cohort of patients with AF who were amongst the highest stroke and bleeding risks reported so far in LAAC trials.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-015-0053-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: Two-year clinical outcome of the randomized ROTAXUS trial

BACKGROUND

In the randomized ROTAXUS trial, routine lesion preparation of complex calcified coronary lesions using rotational atherectomy (RA) prior to paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation did not reduce the primary endpoint of angiographic late lumen loss at 9 months compared to stenting without RA. So far, no long-term data of prospective head-to-head comparisons between both treatment strategies have been reported.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ROTAXUS randomly assigned patients with complex calcified coronary lesions to RA followed by stenting (n = 120) or stenting without RA (n = 120). The primary endpoint of the current analysis was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 2-year follow-up defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). At 2 years, MACE occurred in 32 patients in the RA group and 37 patients in the standard therapy group (29.4% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.47). The rates of death (8.3% vs. 7.4%, P = 1.00), myocardial infarction (8.3% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.80), target lesion revascularization (TLR, 13.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.58), and TVR (19.3% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.62) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite high rates of initial angiographic success, nearly one third of patients enrolled in ROTAXUS experienced MACE within 2-year follow-up, with no differences between patients treated with or without RA.

Longitudinal deformation of contemporary coronary stents: an integrated analysis of clinical experience and observations from the bench

OBJECTIVE

 To report clinical experience with longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) and observations from the bench.

BACKGROUND

 LSD was recently reported with thin-strut coronary stents. Whether it is related to a particular stent or constitutes a class-effect remains debatable.

METHODS

After 2 cases of LSD were reported, information was sent to operators to warn of this event and identify possible cases. All cases were reviewed to ensure LSD had occurred. Simultaneously, bench testing was conducted to identify the susceptibility of stents to longitudinal compression and whether LSD detection is influenced by fluoroscopic stent visibility.

RESULTS

 Between July 2010 and November 2011, 2,705 coronary interventions were performed with 4,588 stents (Promus Element = 41.6%, Xience Prime = 24.4%). Six patients with LSD were identified, all with Promus Element (0.31%). Wire bias was a predisposing factor in 4 cases. All patients were treated with postdilatation and/or additional stenting. No adverse events occurred (mean 5.8 months). In bench testing, LSD occured in all examined stents, but at different levels of applied force (weight). Most shortening at 50 g was observed with Promus Element (38.9%), as was the best visibility of LSD on x-ray images. With postdilatation all stents showed some re-elongation.

CONCLUSION

In our practice LSD was a rare observation only seen with the Promus Element stent. When subjected to longitudinal compression in a bench test all contemporary stents can be compressed. Compression of Promus Element occurs at a lower force, but it is the only stent where deformations are detected with x ray. Postdilatation can partially improve LSD.

Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention

Coronary artery disease negatively affects the outcome of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement and practice guidelines recommend revascularization at time of surgery. In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the impact of preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on TAVI outcome has not been examined. We aimed in the present study to assess the feasibility and safety of performing PCI before TAVI and to evaluate procedural, 30-day, and 6-month clinical outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients who underwent successful TAVI at a single institution and divided them into an isolated TAVI and a PCI + TAVI group. During the study period, a strategy of preprocedural PCI of all significant (>50%) lesions in major epicardial vessels was adopted. Study end points were adjudicated in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium consensus on event definition. All patients were treated with the Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis (n = 55 with PCI + TAVI and n = 70 with isolated TAVI). Thirty-day mortality was 2% versus 6% for patients treated with PCI + TAVI versus isolated TAVI, respectively (p = 0.27). Neither periprocedural nor spontaneous myocardial infarction occurred in either group. Rates of 30-day stroke, major bleeding, major vascular complications, and the Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined combined safety end point (11% vs 13%, p = 0.74) did not differ between the 2 groups. Patients' symptoms significantly improved in the first month after TAVI, and extent of improvement did not differ between groups. Adverse events at 6 months were comparable. In conclusion, PCI before TAVI appears feasible and safe. Based on these early results revascularization should become an important consideration in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing TAVI.

Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AIMS

Echocardiography may underestimate the degree of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis due to inherent limitations of ultrasound imaging in the evaluation of implanted cardiac prostheses. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in quantifying regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) in patients treated with this bioprosthesis for severe calcific aortic stenosis, and to compare the results with echocardiography and aortography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 16 patients with a mean age of 78.7 years (eight women, eight men) who underwent successful TAVI using Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis. AR was evaluated by CMR, echocardiography, and aortography. Angiography was performed immediately after valve implantation. CMR and echocardiography were performed four weeks after valve implantation. There was a highly significant correlation between the CMR-derived and the angiographically-estimated degree of AR (r=0.86, p<0.001). On the other hand, there was only a limited correlation between CMR and echocardiography (r=0.374, p=0.15) as well as angiography and echocardiography (r=0.319, p=0.23) regarding the degree of AR. The weighted kappa for agreement between echocardiography and angiography was 0.14, for agreement between echocardiography and CMR 0.20, and for agreement between angiography and CMR 0.72. Echocardiography underestimated AR by one degree compared to CMR in five patients and 2 degrees in two patients; in six of these, the degree of AR obtained by CMR was similar to angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TAVI, comparisons between purely quantitative measurements of AR by CMR and qualitative assessment by angiography showed better correlations than those with echocardiography. This suggests that echocardiography may underestimate the degree of AR and CMR in these circumstances has a great potential in reliably measuring the severity of AR in a quantitative manner.

Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a combined transfemoral procedure

Coronary artery disease has been reported in more than 50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis above the age of 70 years. Combined surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with a higher operative risk. Concomitant coronary artery disease also increases the procedural risk of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and hence, a combined strategy for treating both entities needs to be carefully considered. Data regarding TAVI and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a combined percutaneous procedure are scarce. We report the case of an 84-year-old woman who presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and impending pulmonary edema who was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis and two-vessel coronary artery disease. Because of an elevated logistic Euroscore of 25% and her unstable presentation, percutaneous coronary revascularization and TAVI were successfully performed in a combined percutaneous transfemoral procedure. She had a smooth recovery and rehabilitation period with significant improvement in her symptoms and functional capacity. Thirty-day follow-up, including transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, showed a well-functioning prosthetic valve and no signs of residual myocardial ischemia. We therefore conclude that combined PCI and TAVI is feasible and can be associated with good clinical outcomes in selected cases. Further data and experience are needed to evaluate this strategy.

Impact of smoking on the outcome of patients treated with drug-eluting stents: 1-year results from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE)

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking strongly increases morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, but the relevance of smoking in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) is unknown.

AIMS

To assess the impact of smoking on the presentation and outcome of patients treated with DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed data from the prospective multicentre German Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE) and identified 1,122 patients who had never smoked and 1,052 patients who were current smokers. Smokers were younger (56.5 vs. 69.4 years, p < 0.0001), more often males, with less frequent diabetes and hypertension compared to non-smokers. Smokers presented more often with acute coronary syndromes. After a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, smokers had both higher mortality (4.6 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (MI) rates (4.9 vs. 3%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers in the rate of target vessel revascularization (9.8 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.26). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (defined as the composite of death, MI and stroke, MACCE) were higher in smokers (10.6 vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). Moreover, after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic variables, smoking continued to be a strong independent predictor for MACCE (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.49-3.68). In a subgroup analysis, we found that the increased risk of smoking was most prominent in patients presenting with stable angina pectoris (OR = 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-2.57, p < 0.05). Smoking almost doubled the risk for MACCE in acute MI patients, though this did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.93-3.94, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

This large multicentre DES registry provides evidence that smokers treated with DES, despite lower incidence of predisposing risk factors for atherosclerosis, experience higher rates of death and MI compared to non-smokers, particularly in the setting of stable coronary artery disease. Smoking has only marginal effects on target vessel revascularization rates in patients treated with DES.

Early hemodynamic and neurohormonal response after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

The conventional surgical aortic bioprostheses used for treatment of aortic stenosis (AS) are inherently stenotic in nature. The more favorable mechanical profile of the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis may translate into a better hemodynamic and neurohormonal response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The early hemodynamic and neurohormonal responses of 56 patients who underwent successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis for severe symptomatic AS were compared with those of 36 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using tissue valves in the same period.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients in the TAVI and SAVR group had comparable indexed aortic valve area (0.33 ± 0.1 vs 0.34 ± 0.1 cm² , respectively; P = .69) and mean transvalvular gradient (51.1 ± 16.5 vs 53.1 ± 14.3 mm Hg, respectively; P = .56). At 30-day follow-up, mean transvalvular gradient was lower in the TAVI group than in the SAVR group (10.3 ± 4 vs 13.1 ± 6.2 mm Hg, respectively; P = .015), and the indexed aortic valve area was larger in the TAVI group (1.0 ± 0.14 vs 0.93 ± 0.13 cm²/m²; P = .017). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch in the surgical group compared with the TAVI group (30.5% vs 17.8%, respectively; P = .11). The overall incidence of prosthetic regurgitation (any degree) was higher in the TAVI group than in the SAVR group (85.7% vs 16.7%, respectively; P < .00001). The left ventricular mass index decreased after TAVI (175.1 ± 61.8 vs 165.6 ± 57.2 g/m²; P = .0003) and remained unchanged after SAVR (165.1 ± 50.6 vs 161 ± 64.8 g/m²; P = .81). Similarly, NT-ProBNP decreased after TAVI (3,479 ± 2,716 vs 2,533 ± 1,849 pg/mL; P = .033) and remained unchanged after SAVR (1,836 ± 2,779 vs 1,689 ± 1,533 pg/mL; P = .78). There was a modest correlation between natriuretic peptides and left ventricular mass index in the whole cohort (r = 0.4, P = .013).

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe AS, TAVI resulted in lower transvalvular gradients and higher valve areas than SAVR. Such hemodynamic performance after TAVI may have contributed to early initiation of a reverse cardiac remodeling process and a decrease in natriuretic peptides.

Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) are established treatment modalities in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. We hypothesized that the insertion of the IABP before primary PCI might result in better survival of patients with cardiogenic shock compared to postponing the insertion to after primary PCI. We, therefore, retrospectively studied 48 patients who had undergone primary PCI with IABP because of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (26 patients received the IABP before and 22 patients after primary PCI). No significant differences were present in the baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. The mean number of diseased vessels was greater in the group of patients treated with the IABP before primary PCI (2.8 +/- 0.5 vs 2.3 +/- 0.7, p = 0.012), but the difference in the number of treated vessels was not significant. The peak creatine kinase and creatine kinase -MB levels were lower in patients treated with the IABP before primary PCI (median 1,077, interquartile range 438 to 2067 vs median 3,299, interquartile range 695 to 6,834, p = 0.047, and median 95, interquartile range 34 to 196 vs median 192, interquartile range 82 to 467, p = 0.048, respectively). In-hospital mortality and the overall incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly lower in the group of patients receiving the IABP before primary PCI (19% vs 59% and 23% vs 77%, p = 0.007 and p = 0.0004, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified renal failure (odds ratio 15.2, 95% confidence interval 3.13 to 73.66) and insertion of the IABP after PCI (odds ratio 5.2, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 24.76) as the only independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who undergo primary PCI assisted by IABP have a more favorable in-hospital outcome and lower in-hospital mortality than patients who receive IABP after PCI.