Ticagrelor increases endothelial progenitor cell level compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: A prospective randomized study

Ticagrelor Treatment is Associated With Increased Coronary Flow Reserve in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

The pleiotropic action of ticagrelor, with effects in addition to platelet inhibition, has been shown to improve endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. These positive effects are possibly adenosine mediated. This study investigated the association of ticagrelor therapy and coronary artery flow reserve in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

This was an exploratory, cross-sectional, open substudy of PROFLOW. High-risk individuals with a history of MI were identified. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was measured non-invasively in the left anterior descending artery using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Coronary flow velocity was measured at rest and at maximal flow after induction of hyperaemia by intravenous infusion of adenosine at 140 μg/kg/min. Patients receiving ticagrelor (n=75) were compared with those not receiving ticagrelor (n=506), using simple and multiple linear regression models. Most patients in both groups were treated with aspirin (97% in the ticagrelor and 94% in the non-ticagrelor group). Adjustment for traditional risk factors was conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age at study inclusion was 68.5±6.8 years, and most patients were male (81.8%). The simple linear regression analysis showed ticagrelor treatment to be significantly associated with increased CFR: ticagrelor 2.95±0.76 (mean±SD), non-ticagrelor 2.70±0.77, (coefficient 0.25; 95% CI 0.063-0.438; p=0.009). This association was significant in two of the three multiple linear regression models with increasing numbers of variables: Model 1 (0.28; 0.06-0.50; p=0.014), Model 2 (0.26; 0.03-0.48; p=0.025), and borderline significant in Model 3 (0.21; -0.01 to 0.43; p=0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor treatment was associated with increased CFR in this high-risk population. Increased CFR may be a clinically important therapeutic effect of ticagrelor in addition to platelet inhibition.

Thrombogenicity and endothelial progenitor cells function during Acute myocardial infarction - comparison of Prasugrel versus Ticagrelor

BACKGROUND

Thrombin generation (TG), platelet function and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have an important role in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease (CAD). To date, the effect of novel P2Y₁₂ inhibitors on these aspects has mostly been studied in the sub-acute phase following myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

Comparing the effects of prasugrel and ticagrelor on TG and EPCs in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

STEMI patients were randomized to either ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment. TG, platelet reactivity and EPCs were evaluated prior to P2Y₁₂ inhibitor loading dose (T0), and one day following (T1).

RESULTS

Between December 2018 - July 2021, 83 consecutive STEMI patients were randomized to ticagrelor (N = 42) or prasugrel (N = 41) treatment. No differences were observed at T0 for all measurements. P2Y₁₂ reactivity units (PRU) at T1 did not differ as well (prasugrel 13.2 [5.5-20.8] vs. ticagrelor 15.8 [4.0-26.3], p = 0.40). At T1, prasugrel was a significantly more potent TG inhibitor, with longer lag time to TG initiation (7.7 ± 7.5 vs. 3.9 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.01), longer time to peak (14.1 ± 12.6 vs. 8.3 ± 9.7 min, p = 0.03) and a lower endogenous thrombin potential (AUC 2186.1 ± 1123.1 vs. 3362.5 ± 2108.5 nM, p < 0.01). Furthermore, EPCs measured by percentage of cells expressing CD34 (2.6 ± 4.1 vs. 1.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.01) and CD133 (2.3 ± 1.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.5, p = 0.01) and number of colony forming units (CFU, 2.1 ± 1.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the prasugrel group.

CONCLUSION

Among STEMI patients, prasugrel as compared to ticagrelor was associated with more potent TG inhibition and improved EPCs count and function.

Efficacy of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are antiplatelet drugs that act by binding to the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Previous studies have compared between them regarding the endothelial function effect.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In August 2021, the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched systematically for eligible trials. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in improving endothelial function in patients with CAD.

RESULTS

Seven trials (n = 511) were included in our systematic review. Ticagrelor resulted in a greater elevation of the level of progenitor cells CD34+ KDR+ and CD34+ 133+ (P = 0.036 and P = 0.019, respectively), with a lower rate of endothelial cell apoptosis rate (P < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor showed superiority regarding nitric oxide, radical oxygen species, and soluble P-selectin levels (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, and P = 0.019, respectively). Flow-mediated dilation findings differed between the studies (P = 0.004 vs. P = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor appears to exert an additional improvement in endothelial function compared with clopidogrel in patients with coronary heart disease.

Pleiotropic Effects of Ticagrelor: Influence on CYP4F2 Gene and Protein Expression in HUVEC and HepG2, and Escherichia coli Bacterial Survival

Background

Antiplatelet drugs, such as ticagrelor, which target platelet P2Y₁₂ receptors, are used for prevention of ischemic heart disease. Ticagrelor is also known to have pleiotropic effects of unknown mechanisms. Ticagrelor could influence the expression of molecules involved in resolution of inflammation. This study aimed to investigate if ticagrelor could change the expression of CYP4F2 and its encoded protein concentration and, additionally, to determine ticagrelor possible antibacterial activity against gram-negative bacteria.

Methods

CYP4F2 expression was determined in HUVEC and HepG2 cell lines by qPCR. CYP4F2 protein concentration was determined by ELISA. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using a disc diffusion method.

Results

Ticagrelor was observed to reduce the expression of CYP4F2 in HUVEC and HepG2 cell lines. It also reduced CYP4F2 protein levels in HUVEC cells. Ticagrelor had no bactericidal activity against gram-negative third generation cephalosporin resistant E. coli.

Conclusion

Ticagrelor reduced CYP4F2 protein concentration in HUVEC, and CYP4F2 expression in HUVEC and HepG2 cells, but had no effect on third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli strains.

The Effect of Ticagrelor on Endothelial Function Compared to Prasugrel, Clopidogrel, and Placebo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objective

Endothelial dysfunction is associated with the long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent evidence suggests that ticagrelor, a potent antiplatelet agent, improves endothelial function. However, several studies demonstrated contrasting results. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of ticagrelor treatment on endothelial function.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature study was conducted on databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A historical search was performed for a reference list of the selected studies as of August 2021. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed using the Cochrane tool. The weighted mean difference (WMD) 95% CI was treated as the overall effect size, and data were pooled using the fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to measure the effects of potential confounders.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included. The meta-analysis indicated that ticagrelor resulted in a significant increase of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (WMD: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.60), reactive hyperemia index (RHI) (WMD: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.13), and circulating progenitor endothelial cells (CEPCs) (WMD: 13.84; 95% CI: 5.70, 21.98), and a reduction in the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) (WMD: −15.39; 95% CI: −25.11, −5.68).

Conclusion

Ticagrelor has a significant effect on some markers of endothelial function in patients with CAD. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity and limited studies.

Coronary microvascular injury in myocardial infarction: perception and knowledge for mitochondrial quality control

Endothelial cells (ECs) constitute the innermost layer in all blood vessels to maintain the structural integrity and microcirculation function for coronary microvasculature. Impaired endothelial function is demonstrated in various cardiovascular diseases including myocardial infarction (MI), which is featured by reduced myocardial blood flow as a result of epicardial coronary obstruction, thrombogenesis, and inflammation. In this context, understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing the function of coronary ECs is essential for the early diagnosis and optimal treatment of MI. Although ECs contain relatively fewer mitochondria compared with cardiomyocytes, they function as key sensors of environmental and cellular stress, in the regulation of EC viability, structural integrity and function. Mitochondrial quality control (MQC) machineries respond to a broad array of stress stimuli to regulate fission, fusion, mitophagy and biogenesis in mitochondria. Impaired MQC is a cardinal feature of EC injury and dysfunction. Hence, medications modulating MQC mechanisms are considered as promising novel therapeutic options in MI. Here in this review, we provide updated insights into the key role of MQC mechanisms in coronary ECs and microvascular dysfunction in MI. We also discussed the option of MQC as a novel therapeutic target to delay, reverse or repair coronary microvascular damage in MI. Contemporary available MQC-targeted therapies with potential clinical benefits to alleviate coronary microvascular injury during MI are also summarized.

The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Endothelial Progenitor Cell Functionality

Platelets mediate circulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) recruitment and maturation, participating in vascular repair, however the underlying mechanism(s) remain unclear. We investigated the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the functionality of CD34⁺-derived late-outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs) in culture. Confluent OECs were coincubated with PRP under platelet aggregation (with adenosine diphosphate; ADP) and nonaggregation conditions, in the presence/absence of the reversible P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist ticagrelor. Outgrowth endothelial cell activation was evaluated by determining prostacyclin (PGI₂) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) release and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) membrane expression. Similar experiments were performed using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Platelet-rich plasma increased ICAM-1 expression and PGI₂ and MCP-1 secretion compared with autologous platelet-poor plasma, whereas ADP-aggregated platelets in PRP did not exhibit any effect. Platelet-rich plasma pretreated with ticagrelor prior to activation with ADP increased all markers to a similar extent as PRP. Similar results were obtained using HUVECs. In conclusion, PRP induces OEC activation, a phenomenon not observed when platelets are aggregated with ADP. Platelet inhibition with ticagrelor restores the PRP capability to activate OECs. Since EPC activation is important for endothelial regeneration and angiogenesis, we suggest that agents inhibiting platelet aggregation, such as ticagrelor, may promote platelet-EPC interaction and EPC function.

Adjunctive Cilostazol to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Enhance Mobilization of Endothelial Progenitor Cell in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled EPISODE Trial

Background: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have the potential to protect against atherothrombotic event occurrences. There are no data to evaluate the impact of cilostazol on EPC levels in high-risk patients. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of adjunctive cilostazol on EPC mobilization and platelet reactivity in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Before discharge, patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol SR capsule (200-mg) a day (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) on top of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin. Before randomization (baseline) and at 30-day follow-up, circulating EPC levels were analyzed using flow cytometry and hemostatic measurements were evaluated by VerifyNow and thromboelastography assays. The primary endpoint was the relative change in EPC levels between baseline and 30-day. Results: At baseline, there were similar levels of EPC counts between treatments, whereas patients with cilostazol showed higher levels of EPC counts compared with placebo after 30 days. Cilostazol versus placebo treatment displayed significantly higher changes in EPC levels between baseline and follow-up (ΔCD133⁺/KDR⁺: difference 216%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 44~388%, p = 0.015; ΔCD34⁺/KDR⁺: difference 183%, 95% CI 25~342%, p = 0.024). At 30-day follow-up, platelet reactivity was lower in the cilostazol group compared with the placebo group (130 ± 45 versus 169 ± 62 P2Y12 Reaction Unit, p = 0.009). However, there were no significant correlations between the changes of EPC levels and platelet reactivity. Conclusion: Adjunctive cilostazol on top of clopidogrel and aspirin versus DAPT alone is associated with increased EPC mobilization and decreased platelet reactivity in AMI patients, suggesting its pleiotropic effects against atherothrombotic events (NCT04407312).

Ticagrelor Increases SIRT1 and HES1 mRNA Levels in Peripheral Blood Cells from Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Ticagrelor is a powerful P2Y₁₂ inhibitor with pleiotropic effects in the cardiovascular system. Consistently, we have reported that in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 1-month treatment with ticagrelor was superior in improving biological markers of endothelial function, compared with clopidogrel. The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying these beneficial effects of ticagrelor by conducting molecular analyses of RNA isolated from peripheral blood cells of these patients. We determined mRNAs levels of markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, such as RORγt (T helper 17 cells marker), FoxP3 (regulatory T cells marker), NLRP3, ICAM1, SIRT1, Notch ligands JAG1 and DLL4, and HES1, a Notch target gene. We found that 1-month treatment with ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel, led to increased levels of SIRT1 and HES1 mRNAs. In patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel, we observed a negative correlation among changes in both SIRT1 and HES1 mRNA and serum levels of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), a marker of endothelial dysfunction found to be reduced by ticagrelor treatment in our previous study. In conclusion, we report that in stable CAD/COPD patients ticagrelor positively regulates HES1 and SIRT1, two genes playing a protective role in the context of inflammation and oxidative stress. Our observations confirm and expand previous studies showing that the beneficial effects of ticagrelor in stable CAD/COPD patients may be, at least in part, mediated by its capacity to reduce systemic inflammation and oxidative stress.

Ticagrelor Enhances Release of Anti-Hypoxic Cardiac Progenitor Cell-Derived Exosomes Through Increasing Cell Proliferation In Vitro

Despite the widespread clinical use of cardioprotection by long-term direct antagonism of P2Y12 receptor, underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we identify how release of pro-survival exosomes from human cardiac-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (hCPCs) is regulated by clinically relevant dose of ticagrelor (1 μM), an oral selective and reversible non-thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ inhibitor. Ticagrelor-induced enhancement of exosome levels is related to increased mitotic activity of hCPCs. We show a drug-response threshold above which the effects on hCPCs are lost due to higher dose of ticagrelor and larger adenosine levels. While it is known that pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor halts cell proliferation through dephosphorylation of histone H3 residue Ser10, we demonstrate that it also prevents ticagrelor-induced effects on release of cardiac progenitor cell-derived exosomes delivering anti-apoptotic HSP70. Indeed, sustained pre-treatment of cardiomyocytes with exosomes released from explant-derived hCPCs exposed to low-dose ticagrelor attenuated hypoxia-induced apoptosis through acute phosphorylation of ERK42/44. Our data indicate that ticagrelor can be leveraged to modulate release of anti-hypoxic exosomes from resident hCPCs.

Platelets in In-stent Restenosis: From Fundamental Role to Possible Prognostic Application

BACKGROUND

Introduction of new generations of stents has decreased the percentage of patients experiencing in-stent restenosis (ISR) following the implantation of stent. However, a large number of patients are still afflicted with this phenomenon, which necessitates further study of ISR pathophysiology.

METHODS

Relevant English literature was searched up to 2018 and retrieved form the PubMed database and Google Scholar search engine. The following keywords were used: "In-stent restenosis", "Platelet", "Chemokine", "Inflammation", "Vascular smooth muscle cell" and "Neointima".

RESULTS

Previous studies have shown that ISR is a pathophysiologic response to damage of the artery wall after its elongation and separation of the atherosclerotic plaque. Development of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following this pathophysiologic response is a function of inflammation caused by platelets, monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes, as well as rapid migration and proliferation of generally quiescent cells in the median layer of the artery wall.

CONCLUSION

After damage to the artery wall, platelets play an essential role in the incidence of NIH by contributing to inflammation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells and extracellular matrix remodeling, especially via secretion of different chemokines; therefore, developing therapeutic strategies for platelet inhibition in a controlled manner could be the basis of preventive treatments in the near future. In this study, for the first time, we hypothesize that evaluation of platelet activity profile in patients before and after stent implantation may determine the prognosis and likelihood of ISR.

Association of Pulse Pressure With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Under Different Antiplatelet Strategies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the association of pulse pressure (PP) and different antiplatelet regimes with clinical and safety outcomes in an all-comers percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) population.

METHODS

In this analysis of GLOBAL LEADERS (n = 15,936) we compared the experimental therapy of 23 months of ticagrelor after 1 month of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs standard DAPT for 12 months followed by aspirin monotherapy in subjects who underwent PCI and were divided into 2 groups according to the median PP (60 mm Hg). The primary end point (all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction) and the composite end points: patient-oriented composite end points (POCE), Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5, and net adverse clinical events (NACE) were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 2 years, subjects in the high-PP group (n = 7971) had similar rates of the primary end point (4.3% vs 3.9%; P = 0.058), POCE (14.9% vs 12.7%; P = 0.051), and BARC 3 or 5 (2.5% vs 1.7%; P = 0.355) and higher rates of NACE (16.4% vs 13.7%; P = 0.037) compared with the low-PP group (n = 7965). Among patients with PP < 60 mm Hg, the primary end point (3.4% vs 4.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.96), POCE (11.8% vs 13.5%, aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98), NACE (12.8% vs 14.7%, aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96), and BARC 3 or 5 (1.4% vs 2.1%, aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97) were lower with ticagrelor monotherapy compared with DAPT. The only significant interaction was for BARC 3 or 5 (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

After contemporary PCI, subjects with high PP levels experienced high rates of NACE at 2 years. In those with low PP, ticagrelor monotherapy led to a lower risk of bleeding events compared with standard DAPT.

Comparison of the Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Invasive Physiologic Indices

Background:

Ticagrelor reduced the rate of myocardial infarction and death compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, little is understood about chronic treatment of ticagrelor on microvascular dysfunction. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of ticagrelor maintenance treatment on microvascular system and coronary flow in comparison with clopidogrel.

Methods:

This study was a nonblinded, open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 120 patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring stent implantation. Patients were randomized into the ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300 to 600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) group. The primary end point was coronary microvascular dysfunction as measured by an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at 6 months after treatment.

Results:

The baseline clinical characteristics and physiological parameters, such as fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and IMR, did not differ between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. Six-month follow-up physiological data showed that the IMR value was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group than the clopidogrel group (15.57±5.65 versus 21.15±8.39, P <0.01), and coronary flow reserve was higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (3.85±0.72 versus 3.37±0.76, P <0.01). However, there was no difference in fractional flow reserve (0.87±0.08 versus 0.87±0.09, P =0.94) between the 2 groups. The improvement in IMR after 6 months of treatment was higher in the ticagrelor group ( P <0.01). Analyses of 223 nonculprit vessels of registered patients based on physiological results showed no differences in baseline fractional flow reserve (0.93±0.13 versus 0.92±0.09, P =0.58), coronary flow reserve (3.62±1.27 versus 3.51±1.24, P =0.16), or IMR (21.37±12.37 versus 24.19±21.08, P =0.22) or in follow-up fractional flow reserve (0.91±0.09 versus 0.91±0.08, P =0.67), coronary flow reserve (3.91±1.22 versus 3.75±1.16, P =0.36), or IMR (19.43±10.32 versus 21.52±18.90, P =0.34) between the 2 groups.

Conclusions:

Compared with clopidogrel, 6 months of ticagrelor therapy significantly improved microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome patients with stent implantation.

Clinical Trial Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Course of platelet miRNAs after cessation of P2Y12 antagonists

BACKGROUND

Circulating platelet micro-RNAs (miRNAs) may be used to monitor platelet function during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Aim of the study was to measure plasma levels of specific miRNAs (miRNA-223, -150, -21 and -126) after physician-driven cessation of chronic P2Y12 inhibition and to study differences in the expression levels of these miRNAs between the different oral P2Y12 inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively.

DESIGN

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on DAPT maintenance dose (including aspirin 100 mg OD, plus clopidogrel 75 mg OD, or prasugrel 10 mg OD, or ticagrelor 90 mg BID) were prospectively enrolled before cessation of the P2Y12-inhibitor therapy. MiRNA-223, -150, -21 and -126 were determined at baseline (=last day of P2Y12-inhibitor intake) and 10, 30 and 180 days thereafter.

RESULTS

Cessation of P2Y12-inhibitor therapy did not significantly change miRNA levels. However, in ticagrelor-treated patients, miRNA levels were significantly increased at baseline (miRNA-223 and -21), day 10 (miRNA-223, -150, -21, -126) and day 30 (miRNA-223, -150, -21, -126) as compared to prasugrel, and at day 10 (miRNA-150 and -21) and day 30 (miRNA-150) as compared to clopidogrel (all P < 0.05). At day 180, only miRNA-126 levels differed significantly with respect to the P2Y12 inhibitor used (P < 0.05). After adjustment for confounders, choice of P2Y12-inhibitor was the strongest predictor of miRNA levels (P < 0.001), while cessation of P2Y12-inhibitor therapy did not significantly impact miRNA levels.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CAD, ticagrelor intake is associated with increased levels of platelet miRNAs as compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel. Platelet miRNAs are not useful to monitor platelet function after cessation of P2Y12 inhibitors.

Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background

We compared the acute and midterm effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on aortic stiffness.

Methods and Results

We studied 117 patients in a randomized, assessor‐blinded, parallel‐group trial. The acute effect of ticagrelor was studied in 58 patients randomized (1:1) to receive a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) or ticagrelor (180 mg). Carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) was measured before, 3, and 24 hours after the loading dose. The midterm effect (30‐day treatment period) was studied in 59 subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were randomized to either clopidogrel (75 mg, OD) or ticagrelor (90 mg BID). cfPWV was measured before and at 30 days of treatment. Circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial function were measured at all study points. Repeated‐measures analysis showed a significant main effect for treatment (P=0.03), with the ticagrelor showing a reduction in cfPWV after treatment. cfPWV at 24 hours was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group compared with the clopidogrel group (P=0.017) (maximal response reduction by 0.42±0.26 m/s). At 30 days, cfPWV decreased in the ticagrelor group, whereas there was no change with clopidogrel (−0.43±0.57 versus 0.12±0.14 m/s, P=0.004). There were no significant changes in both the acute and midterm study period in the pro‐inflammatory and endothelial function parameters.

Conclusions

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02071212. Ticagrelor decreases cfPWV for 24 hours after the loading dose and at 1 month post–percutaneous coronary intervention compared with clopidogrel. Considering that aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events, this finding may have clinical implications regarding the beneficial effect of ticagrelor.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02071212.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor and prasugrel are third-generation oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists with rapid onset and pronounced platelet inhibition. However, higher overall bleeding rates have been reported for these agents when compared with clopidogrel.

AIM

To compare the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among users of third-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors with clopidogrel.

METHODS

We systematically searched for published randomised controlled trials of ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel until September 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of GIB among users of third-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors when compared to clopidogrel, expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The rates of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major bleeding, life-threatening bleeding, fatal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the analysis of non-CABG major bleeding, of which 12 were included in the analysis of GIB including 58 678 patients. Third-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors were associated with higher risk of GIB as compared with clopidogrel (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13-1.46). The findings were consistent for upper (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.67) and unspecified GIB (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.53), but not lower GIB (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.95-1.65). Subgroup analysis showed higher GIB risk in prasugrel studies (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.77) than in ticagrelor studies (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). Third-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors also increased the risk of non-CABG major bleeding (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.28).

CONCLUSION

Third-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors were associated with increased risk of GIB and non-CABG major bleeding when compared with clopidogrel.

Endothelial Function: A Short Guide for the Interventional Cardiologist

An impaired function of the coronary endothelium is an important determinant of all stages of atherosclerosis, from initiation, to mediation of functional phenomena—such as spasm and plaque erosion, to atherothrombotic complications. Endothelial function is modified by therapies, including stent implantation. Finally, endothelial function changes over time, in response to physical stimuli and pharmocotherapies, and its assessment might provide information on how individual patients respond to specific therapies. In this review, we describe the role of the endothelium in the continuum of coronary atherosclerosis, from the perspective of the interventional cardiologist. In the first part, we review the current knowledge of the role of endothelial (dys)function on atherosclerotic plaque progression/instabilization and on the mechanisms of ischemia, in the absence of coronary artery stenosis. In the second part of this review, we describe the impact of coronary artery stenting on endothelial function, platelet aggregation, and inflammation.

Promoting vascular healing using nanofibrous ticagrelor-eluting stents

Objective

The current treatment of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease with limus-eluting stents can lead to incomplete endothelialization and substantial impairment of arterial healing relative to treatment with bare-metal stents. The sustained and local delivery of ticagrelor, a reversibly binding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, using hybrid biodegradable nanofibers/stents, was developed to reduce neointimal formation and endothelial dysfunction.

Methods

In this investigation, a solution of ticagrelor, poly(D,L)-lactide-co-glycolide, and hexafluoro isopropanol was electrospun to fabricate ticagrelor-eluting nanofibrous drug-eluting stents. The in vitro and in vivo ticagrelor concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The effectiveness of ticagrelor-eluting stents was examined relative to that of sirolimus-eluting stents.

Results

Adequate ticagrelor levels were detected for four weeks in vitro. Less HES5-positive labeling was found near the ticagrelor-eluting stented vessels (0.33±0.12) than close to the sirolimus-eluting stented vessels (0.57±0.15) (p<0.05). Four weeks after deployment, the ticagrelor-eluting stent also exhibited an up-regulated local expression of SOD1 in the stenting area (p<0.001). The ticagrelor-eluting stent substantially preserved endothelial function and re-endothelialization, minimized inflammatory responses, and inhibited neointimal hyperplasia.

Conclusion

Ticagrelor-eluting stents may provide an alternative route for treating patients at a high risk of bleeding to preserve endothelial recovery and to reduce smooth muscle proliferation.

No Differences in Levels of Circulating Progenitor Endothelial Cells or Circulating Endothelial Cells Among Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel During Non- ST -Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Ticagrelor use during acute coronary syndromes demonstrated a decrease in all‐cause mortality in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. This effect has been attributed to a non–platelet‐derived improvement in endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determine differences in the number of endothelial progenitor cells and/or circulating endothelial cells found in peripheral blood in patients treated with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results

In this multicenter, randomized study (NCT02244710), patients were considered for inclusion after non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction whenever they were P2Y₁₂‐inhibitor naïve. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were allocated at a 1:1 ratio. Blood samples for determining endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells were extracted before the antiplatelet loading dose, 48 hours after presentation of index symptoms, and 1 month after the event. A multichannel cytometer was used for optimal cell characterization. A total of 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Circulating endothelial cell levels corrected by white blood cells were as follows at baseline, 48 hours, and 1 month: 44 (28–64), 50 (33–63), and 38 (23–62) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 38 (29–60), 45 (32–85), and 35 (24–71) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.6). Endothelial progenitor cell levels were 29 (15–47), 27 (15–33), and 18 (10–25) cells/mL, respectively, for clopidogrel and 20 (11–33), 22 (12–32), and 18 (11–29) cells/mL, respectively, for ticagrelor (P=0.9). No differences in intraindividual changes were found.

Conclusions

Patients treated with ticagrelor during non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, in comparison to clopidogrel, showed similar levels of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells. These data suggest that the endothelial protective effect mediated by ticagrelor is not related to bone marrow physiology modulation.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02244710.

Interaction between platelets and endothelium: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic options

Platelets were traditionally considered to purely have a role in the maintenance of haemostasis. Recently their role in vasomotor function, inflammation and atherosclerosis has been very well-recognized. Endothelium which was originally considered as a simple passive barrier, it is now viewed as an organ whose normal functioning is crucial for maintaining vascular health. When endothelial balance is disturbed, vascular disease initiates. Platelet interactions with endothelium have an important contribution in this process. Low-grade inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and platelet hyper-reactivity are all independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Older antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel and newer more potent agents like prasugrel and ticagrelor have been proven effective in all the clinical spectrum of coronary artery disease patients. Current antiplatelet medications and especially newer generation P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor, offer clinical benefits not only due to their well-recognized antithrombotic effect, but also via the attenuation of platelet inflammatory action, impediment of P2Y12 activation effects in other cells and through other complex and sometimes undefined pathways. Future research is expected to better define platelet-endothelium interactions and the multiple impact of current antiplatelet therapy on them.

Choosing between ticagrelor and clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis (2007-2017)

BACKGROUND

Limitations have been observed with the use of clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) indicating the urgent need of a more potent anti-platelet agent. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel following PCI.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for relevant studies (published between the years 2007 and 2017) comparing ticagrelor versus clopidogrel following coronary stenting. Primary outcomes assessed efficacy whereas secondary outcomes assessed safety. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on a random effect model were calculated and the analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total number of 25,632 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [12,992 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 14,215 patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] were included in this analysis, of whom 23,714 patients were revascularized by PCI. Results of this analysis did not show any significant difference in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), myocardial infarction, stroke and stent thrombosis observed between ticagrelor and clopidogrel with (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67-1.03; P = .09), (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01; P = .06), (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.57-1.03; P = .08), (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.57-1.26; P = .42) and (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47-1.05; P =.09).However, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly higher minor and major bleeding with (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.30-1.89; P = .00001) and (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.29; P = 0.04) respectively. Dyspnea was also significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.87-3.72; P = .00001).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were comparable in terms of efficacy in these patients with ACS. However, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor should further be investigated.

Does Ticagrelor Improve Endothelial Function?

Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor antagonist with proven clinical benefit in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Apart from its principal antiplatelet action, pleiotropic effects have been implicated in the clinical profile of ticagrelor, including a potentially beneficial impact on endothelial function. In light of the common presence and prognostic value of endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease, several clinical studies have investigated the postulated effect of ticagrelor on endothelial function, yielding conflicting results. Limitations of the relevant studies as well as substantial differences in patient population, study design, and methods may account for these controversial findings. Most of these studies, however, support a beneficial impact of ticagrelor on endothelial function, which seems to be significant in the higher risk patients. In order to elucidate this effect, further research efforts should aim to clarify how quickly does endothelial function respond to ticagrelor, how sustained this response is during the dosing intervals and in the long term, which mechanisms are implicated, and whether this pleiotropic action is clinically significant. Future studies should include larger and diverse populations of patients, assess endothelial function at several time points after treatment initiation, and use multiple methods of endothelial function measurement, while implementing strict methodology. Nevertheless, the extent of the clinical benefit of ticagrelor attributable to actions beyond its potent and consistent antiplatelet effect remains uncertain.

Randomized Comparison of Strut Coverage between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Myocardial Infarction at 3-Month Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on early neointimal healing assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AMI patients were randomly assigned to either the ticagrelor or clopidogrel arm. After DES implantation, OCT was performed to assess the percentages of uncovered struts immediately after procedure and 3 months later.

RESULTS

Due to early termination, 83 patients out of 106 initially enrolled patients (24% of planned participants) underwent 3-month OCT. Differences in vascular healing patterns between the two groups, including percentage of uncovered struts on 3-month OCT (9.6% vs. 11.7% in ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel, respectively; p=0.867), neointimal thickness, percentage of malapposed struts, and healing scores did not reach statistical significance. The predictors of uncovered strut on 3-month OCT included greater reference vessel diameter [odds ratio (OR)=1.96, p<0.001] and more malapposed struts (OR=1.12, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The current study did not explore favorable effect of ticagrelor on 3-month vascular healing after DES implantation. Our findings should only be considered for generating hypothesis, due to insufficient power.

Comparison of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for Inflammation, Vascular Function, and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetic Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Requiring Coronary Stenting: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study compared adenosine-associated pleiotropic effects of the 2 P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists on vascular function, systemic inflammation, and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).

BACKGROUND

Both ticagrelor and prasugrel have potent antiplatelet effects. However, only ticagrelor inhibits cellular uptake of adenosine.

METHODS

Using a randomized, crossover design with 10-week follow-up ticagrelor or prasugrel was administered to type 2 diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome requiring stent implantation. A total of 62 patients underwent randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel for 5 weeks followed by a direct cross over to the alternative treatment for 5 additional weeks. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, inflammatory markers, and number of circulating EPCs were compared.

RESULTS

Improvement in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was greater in the ticagrelor group (0.15 ± 0.19 mm vs. -0.03 ± 0.18 mm; p < 0.001). Moreover, ticagrelor compared with prasugrel decreased interleukin 6 (-0.58 ± 0.43 pg/ml vs. -0.05 ± 0.24 pg/ml; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor alpha (-5.62 ± 4.40 pg/ml vs. -0.42 ± 2.64 pg/ml; p < 0.001), and increased adiponectin (2.31 ± 2.00 μg/ml vs. 0.08 ± 1.50 μg/ml; p < 0.001) during 10-week follow-up. Other inflammatory cytokines like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 were decreased in both groups. Ticagrelor compared with prasugrel significantly increased absolute numbers of circulating EPCs CD34+/KDR+ (42.5 ± 37.8 per μl vs. -28.2 ± 23.7 per μl; p < 0.001), CD34+/CD117+ (51.9 ± 77.2 per μl vs. -66.3 ± 45.2 per μl; p < 0.001), and CD34+/CD133+ (55.2 ± 69.2 per μl vs. -28.0 ± 34.1 per μl; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor significantly decreased inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha and increased circulating EPCs, contributing to improved arterial endothelial function in diabetic non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Thus, data support that pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor beyond its potent antiplatelet effects could contribute to additional clinical benefits. (Comparison of Ticagrelor vs. Prasugrel on Inflammation, Arterial Stiffness, Endothelial Function, and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetic Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome [NSTE-ACS] Requiring Coronary Stenting; NCT02487732).

Ticagrelor protects against AngII-induced endothelial dysfunction by alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress

Ticagrelor has been reported to decrease cardiovascular mortality compared with clopidogrel. This benefit cannot be fully explained by the more efficient platelet inhibition. Many studies demonstrated that ticagrelor improved endothelial function, leaving the mechanism elusive though. The present study aims to investigate whether ticagrelor protects against endothelial dysfunction induced by angiotensinII (AngII) through alleviating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Male Sprague Dawley rats were infused with AngII or vehicle and administrated with ticagrelor or vehicle for 14 days. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected. Aortas from normal mice were incubated with endoplasmic reticulum stress inducer tunicamycin with or without ticagrelor. Vasorecactivity was measured on wire myography. Rat aortic endothelial cells (RAECs) were pretreated with ticagrelor followed by AngII or tunicamycin. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation and ER stress markers were determined by western blotting. Impaired endothelial function, induction of ER stress, reduced eNOS phosphorylation and elevated ROS generation was restored by ticagrelor treatment in vivo. In addition, tunicamycin induced endothelial dysfunction was improved by ticagrelor. In vitro, the induction of ER stress and inhibited eNOS phosphorylation in REACs exposed to AngII as well as tunicamycin was reversed by co-culturing with ticagrelor. In conclusion, ticagrelor protects against AngII-induced endothelial dysfunction via alleviating ER stress.

Circulating progenitor cells and their interaction with platelets in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

CD34⁺ cells expressing KDR (CD34⁺/KDR⁺) represent a small proportion of circulating progenitor cells that have the capacity to interact with platelets and to differentiate into mature endothelial cells, thus contributing to vascular homeostasis and regeneration as well as to re-endothelialization. We investigated the levels of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺/KDR⁺ progenitor cells as well as their interaction with platelets in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients before the initiation (baseline) of their treatment with a P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, and at 5-days post-treatment (follow-up). Sixty-seven consecutive ACS patients and thirty healthy subjects (controls) participated in the study. On admission, all patients received 325 mg aspirin, followed by 100 mg/day and then were loaded either with 600 mg clopidogrel or 180 mg ticagrelor, followed by 75 mg/day (n = 36) or 90 mg × 2/day (n = 31), respectively. The levels of circulating CD34⁺ and CD34⁺/KDR⁺ progenitor cells, as well as their interaction with platelets, were determined by flow cytometry, before and after activation with ADP, in vitro. The circulating levels of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺/KDR⁺ cells in both patient groups at baseline were lower compared with controls while they were significantly increased at 5-days of follow-up in both groups, this increase being more pronounced in the ticagrelor group. The platelet/CD34⁺ (CD61⁺/CD34⁺) conjugates were higher at baseline and reduced at follow-up while the platelet/KDR⁺ (CD61⁺/KDR⁺) conjugates were lower at baseline and increased at follow-up, both changes being more pronounced in the ticagrelor group. ADP activation of control samples significantly increased the KDR expression by CD34⁺ cells and the CD61⁺/KDR⁺ conjugates, these parameters being unaffected in patients at baseline but increased at follow-up. Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients restores the low platelet/KDR⁺ conjugates and CD34⁺ cell levels and improves the low membrane expression levels of KDR in these cells, an effect being more pronounced in ticagrelor-treated patients. This may represent a pleiotropic effect of antiplatelet therapy towards vascular endothelial regeneration.

Ticagrelor - toward more efficient platelet inhibition and beyond

Novel antiplatelet drugs, including ticagrelor, are being successively introduced into the therapy of atherothrombotic conditions due to their superiority over a standard combination of clopidogrel with acetylsalicylic acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A P2Y12 receptor antagonist, ticagrelor, is unique among antiplatelet drugs, because ticagrelor inhibits the platelet P2Y12 receptor in a reversible manner, and because it demonstrates a wide palette of advantageous pleiotropic effects associated with the increased concentration of adenosine. The pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor comprise cardioprotection, restoration of the myocardium after an ischemic event, promotion of the release of anticoagulative factors and, eventually, anti-inflammatory effects. Beyond the advantageous effects, the increased concentration of adenosine is responsible for some of ticagrelor's adverse effects, including dyspnea and bradycardia. Large-scale clinical trials demonstrated that both standard 12-month therapy and long-term use of ticagrelor reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with ACS, but at the expense of a higher risk of major bleeding. Further trials focused on the use of ticagrelor in conditions other than ACS, including ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease and status after coronary artery bypass grafting. The results of these trials suggest comparable efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in extra-coronary indications, but firm conclusions are anticipated from currently ongoing studies. Here, we summarize current evidence on the superiority of ticagrelor over other P2Y12 antagonists in ACS, discuss the mechanism underlying the drug-drug interactions and pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor, and present future perspectives of non-coronary indications for ticagrelor.

Absence of differential effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel maintenance dose on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function may be improved by ticagrelor through adenosine-mediated mechanisms. We aimed to assess the effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel on endothelial function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, crossover study, 22 stable CAD patients under prasugrel 10 mg once daily maintenance dose (MD) for at least 3 months were randomized to either ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or prasugrel 10 mg once daily for 15 days with a direct treatment-crossover for another 15 days. Endothelial function was assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT 2000 system, Itamar Medical, Caesarea, Israel) at Day 0 (randomization), Day 15, and Day 30. Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) was calculated by using an automated software, and endothelial dysfunction (ED) was defined as RHI <1.67. RHI at the end of the two treatment periods did not differ between ticagrelor and prasugrel MD treatments. Least squares estimates (95% confidence interval) were 1.78 (1.58-1.99) versus 1.88 (1.67-2.08), with a fixed estimate of -0.099 (95% CI: -0.45 to 0.25) for the difference between them (p = 0.5). ED rate did not differ significantly between ticagrelor and prasugrel (45.5% vs 45.5%, p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In CAD patients, we have failed to find evidence of alteration of endothelial function following ticagrelor compared to prasugrel MD treatment, as assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV UNIQUE IDENTIFIER

NCT01957540.

Comparison of treatment outcomes of ticagrelor and clopidogrel among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (TIC) vs. clopidogrel (CLO) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Jun 2016, a literature search was started and all the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2015. We systematically searched the literature through the MEDLINE database, Cochrane library, and EMBASE database. Quality assessments were evaluated with Jadad quality scale. Data were extracted considering the characteristics of efficacy and safety designs. Six RCTs enrolling 26 244 participants and satisfying the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. There was a significant decrease of all-cause mortality (MD=0.83, 95%CI=0.74-0.93, P=0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (MD=0.78, 95%CI=0.70-0.88, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in stroke (MD=1.34, 95%CI=0.99-1.79, P=0.06), total bleeding (MD=0.97, 95%CI=0.84-1.12, P=0.66), minor or major bleeding (MD=1.06, 95%CI=0.94-1.19, P=0.35) in patients undergoing PCI after treatment with TIC vs. CLO. TIC could be more significant in decreasing all-cause mortality and MI than CLO, but there were no significant differences between TIC and CLO in inhibiting stroke, major bleeding, major or minor bleeding in patients undergoing PCI.

Effects of ticagrelor on neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial function, compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel, in a porcine coronary stent restenosis model

BACKGROUND

Several investigations have been conducted to evaluate the off-target effects of ticagrelor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the off-target effects of ticagrelor such as neointimal formation and endothelial function after drug-eluting stent implantation in a porcine restenosis model.

METHODS

A total of 30 pigs were randomly allocated based on the following P2Y₁₂ inhibitor: (1) clopidogrel 300mg loading plus 75mg maintenance (n=10); (2) prasugrel 60mg loading plus 10mg maintenance (n=10); (3) ticagrelor 180mg loading plus 180mg maintenance (n=10). In each group, zotarolimus-eluting stents were implanted in the proximal portion of the left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery. One month after stenting, the animals underwent follow-up angiography, endothelial function assessment, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

Regarding vasomotor responses to acetylcholine infusion, there were significant vasoconstrictions to maximal acetylcholine infusion in the clopidogrel and prasugrel group compared with those in the ticagrelor group. The mean neointimal area were significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (1.0±0.3 by OCT, 0.9±0.3 by histology), than in the clopidogrel (1.8±0.7, p=0.003, 1.6±0.8, p=0.030) and prasugrel (1.8±0.5, p=0.001, 1.5±0.5, p=0.019) groups. Percentages of moderate to dense peri-strut inflammatory cell infiltration were significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (9.0%) compared with the clopidogrel (17.3%, p<0.001) and prasugrel groups (15.7%, p=0.002). There were no significant differences in all findings between clopidogrel and prasugrel groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel, ticagrelor reduced neointimal formation, endothelial dysfunction, and peri-strut inflammation.

Effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists beyond platelet inhibition--comparison of ticagrelor with thienopyridines

The effect and clinical benefit of P2Y12 receptor antagonists may not be limited to platelet inhibition and the prevention of arterial thrombus formation. Potential additional effects include reduction of the pro-inflammatory role of activated platelets and effects related to P2Y12 receptor inhibition on other cells apart from platelets. P2Y12 receptor antagonists, thienopyridines and ticagrelor, differ in their mode of action being prodrugs instead of direct acting and irreversibly instead of reversibly binding to P2Y12 . These key differences may provide different potential when it comes to additional effects. In addition to P2Y12 receptor blockade, ticagrelor is unique in having the only well-documented additional target of inhibition, the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. The current review will address the effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists beyond platelets and the protection against arterial thrombosis. The discussion will include the potential for thienopyridines and ticagrelor to mediate anti-inflammatory effects, to conserve vascular function, to affect atherosclerosis, to provide cardioprotection and to induce dyspnea.