Adverse cardiovascular effects of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis: A nationwide population-based retrospective study

Association between bisphosphonate use and stroke risk: a meta-analysis

Previous studies have suggested that bisphosphonates may reduce stroke risk. This meta-analysis, which included 21 studies with 741,274 participants, revealed that bisphosphonates might be associated with lower stroke risk. However, evidence derived from randomized controlled trials identified no statistically significant association. Future high-quality studies are still required to determine causality.

PURPOSE

Whether bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of stroke remains inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between bisphosphonate use and the risk of stroke based on up-to-date evidence.

METHODS

We searched for studies evaluating the effects of bisphosphonate on the risk of stroke from inception until January 3, 2022, on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries and updated our search until August 22, 2022, using PubMed to identify any new potential published studies. Two or more reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. We retrieved the data to synthesize the pooled relative risk (RR) of stroke associated with bisphosphonate use compared with controls; random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies (7 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 14 observational studies) involving 741,274 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of stroke, but the result was only borderline significant (pooled RR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.99, p = 0.048), and high between-study heterogeneity was found (I2 = 83.7%). Subgroup analyses showed that the evidence derived from RCTs suggested no significant association between bisphosphonate use and stroke risk (pooled RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.76-1.13, p = 0.462; I2 = 13.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that bisphosphonate use is associated with a lower risk of stroke. However, the current evidence does not lead to a definite conclusion due to the borderline statistical significance and high between-study heterogeneity. Future studies, especially RCTs, are necessary to assess causality.

Association of oral bisphosphonates with cardioembolic ischemic stroke: a nested case-control study

Background: Bisphosphonates have been reported to increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, it is conceivable that they may increase the risk of cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS). However, most epidemiological studies carried out thus far have not shown an increased risk of IS, though none separated by the main pathophysiologic IS subtype (cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic) which may be crucial. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the risk of cardioembolic IS, and explored the effect of treatment duration, as well as the potential interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements and anticoagulants. Methods: We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort of patients aged 40-99 years, using the Spanish primary healthcare database BIFAP, over the period 2002-2015. Incident cases of IS were identified and classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic. Five controls per case were randomly selected, matched for age, sex, and index date (first recording of IS) using an incidence-density sampling. The association of IS (overall and by subtype) with the use of oral bisphosphonates within the last year before index date was assessed by computing the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their 95% CI using a conditional logistic regression. Only initiators of oral bisphosphonates were considered. Results: A total of 13,781 incident cases of IS and 65,909 controls were included. The mean age was 74.5 (SD ± 12.4) years and 51.6% were male. Among cases, 3.15% were current users of oral bisphosphonates, while among controls they were 2.62%, yielding an AOR of 1.15 (95% CI:1.01-1.30). Of all cases, 4,568 (33.1%) were classified as cardioembolic IS (matched with 21,697 controls) and 9,213 (66.9%) as non-cardioembolic IS (matched with 44,212 controls) yielding an AOR of 1.35 (95% CI:1.10-1.66) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.88-1.21), respectively. The association with cardioembolic IS was clearly duration-dependent (AOR≤1 year = 1.10; 95% CI:0.82-1.49; AOR>1-3 years = 1.41; 95% CI:1.01-1.97; AOR>3 years = 1.81; 95% CI:1.25-2.62; p for trend = 0.001) and completely blunted by anticoagulants, even in long-term users (AOR>1 year = 0.59; 0.30-1.16). An interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements was suggested. Conclusion: The use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the odds of cardioembolic IS, in a duration-dependent manner, while leaves materially unaffected the odds of non-cardioembolic IS.

Xianling Gubao attenuates high glucose-induced bone metabolism disorder in MG63 osteoblast-like cells

Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients are prone to osteoporosis, and high glucose (HG) can affect bone metabolism. In the present study, we investigated the protective effects of traditional Chinese herbal formulation Xianling Gubao (XLGB) on HG-treated MG63 osteoblast-like cells. MG63 cells were incubated with control (mannitol), HG (20 mM glucose) or HG + XLGB (20 mM glucose+200 mg/L XLGB) mediums. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion were examined using CCK8, colony-formation, flow cytometry, Hoechst/PI staining, wound-healing and transwell assays, respectively. ELISA, RT-PCR and western blot analysis were used to detect the levels of osteogenesis differentiation-associated markers such as ALP, OCN, OPN, RUNX2, OPG, and OPGL in MG63 cells. The levels of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway related proteins, cell cycle-related proteins, and mitochondrial apoptosis-related proteins were detected using western blot analysis. In HG-treated MG63 cells, XLGB significantly attenuated the suppression on the proliferation, migration and invasion of MG63 cells caused by HG. HG downregulated the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and the expressions of cell cycle-related proteins, while XLGB reversed the inhibition of HG on MG63 cells. Moreover, XLGB significantly reduced the promotion on the apoptosis of MG63 cells induced by HG, the expressions of mitochondrial apoptosis-related proteins were suppressed by XLGB treatment. In addition, the expressions of osteogenesis differentiation-associated proteins were also rescued by XLGB in HG-treated MG63 cells. Our data suggest that XLGB rescues the MG63 osteoblasts against the effect of HG. The potential therapeutic mechanism of XLGB partially attributes to inhibiting the osteoblast apoptosis and promoting the bone formation of osteoblasts.

Cardiovascular Safety and Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates: From Intervention Trials to Real-Life Data

Both osteoporosis with related fragility fractures and cardiovascular diseases are rapidly outspreading worldwide. Since they are often coexistent in elderly patients and may be related to possible common pathogenetic mechanisms, the possible reciprocal effects of drugs employed to treat these diseases have to be considered in clinical practice. Bisphosphonates, the agents most largely employed to decrease bone fragility, have been shown to be overall safe with respect to cardiovascular diseases and even capable of reducing cardiovascular morbidity in some settings, as mainly shown by real life studies. No randomized controlled trials with cardiovascular outcomes as primary endpoints are available. While contradictory results have emerged about a possible BSP-mediated reduction of overall mortality, it is undeniable that these drugs can be employed safely in patients with high fracture risk, since no increased mortality has ever been demonstrated. Although partial reassurance has emerged from meta-analysis assessing the risk of cardiac arrhythmias during bisphosphonates treatment, caution is warranted in administering this class of drugs to patients at risk for atrial fibrillation, possibly preferring other antiresorptives or anabolics, according to osteoporosis guidelines. This paper focuses on the complex relationship between bisphosphonates use and cardiovascular disease and possible co-management issues.

Intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment affects the bone structural parameters and mechanical strength of the femoral neck after ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats

Background

Menopause-induced decline in estrogen levels in women is a main factor leading to osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) on bone structural parameters of the femoral neck in ovariectomized rats, in addition to correlations of maximum fracture force.

Methods

Fifteen female Wister rats were divided into three groups: (1) control group; (2) ovariectomized (OVX) group; and (3) OVX  +  PTH group. All rats were then killed and the femurs extracted for microcomputed tomography scanning to measure volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone structural parameters of the femoral neck. Furthermore, the fracture forces of femoral neck were measured using a material testing system.

Results

Compared with the control and OVX  +  PTH groups, the OVX group had significantly lower aBMD, bone parameter, and mechanical strength values. A comparison between OVX and OVX  +  PTH groups indicated that PTH treatment increased several bone parameters. However, the OVX  +  PTH groups did not significantly differ with the control group with respect to the bone structural parameters, except for trabecular bone thickness of cancellous bone, which was greater. In addition, among the bone structural parameters, the CSA and BSI of cortical bone were significantly correlated with the maximum fracture force of the femoral neck, with correlations of, respectively, 0.682 (p  = 0.005) and 0.700 (p  = 0.004).

Conclusion

Intermittent PTH helped treat ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis of cancellous bone and cortical bone in the femoral necks of rats. The ability of the femoral neck to resist fracture was highly correlated with the two parameters, namely cross-sectional area (CSA) and bone strength index (=  vBMD  ×  CSA), of cortical bone in the femoral neck and was less correlated with aBMD or other bone structural parameters.

Benefits of Herbal Medicine on Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bone mineral density (BMD) has been validated not only for the diagnosis of osteoporosis but also for prediction of the risk of osteoporosis-related fractures. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the overall benefits of herbal medicines on BMD using a meta-analytic method. Systematic searches in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were performed for eligible studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefits of herbal medicine treatment and conventional treatment for BMD. Herbal medicines frequently used for interventions were pooled in the analysis and further investigated. Seventeen studies were pooled in the meta-analysis and showed that BMD was higher in the herbal medicine group than in the control group (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.857; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.412 to 1.301). Significant benefits of herbal medicine for BMD were found in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter and in postmenopausal women (SMD: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.068 to 1.131) by subgroup analysis. Moreover, through the meta-regression analysis, the age at menopause and the menopause duration were found to influence the herbal intervention effects on BMD. In addition, the most prescribed medicine among the effective herbs in the pooled studies was found to be Epimedium brevicornum Maxim. This paper provides evidence that herbal medicine interventions increase BMD more than conventional treatments in individuals with osteoporosis, especially postmenopausal women. The results of this study suggest that herbal medicines are effective for increasing BMD in individuals with osteoporosis.

Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries

BACKGROUND

This observational safety study used national registers to compare the real world cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid (ZA) against oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and untreated population controls.

METHODS

Propensity score matched cohort study in Sweden and Denmark.

RESULTS

Matched cohort 1 included 8739 ZA users and 25,577 oBP users while matched cohort 2 included 8731 ZA users and 25,924 untreated subjects. In comparison to oBP users, heart failure risk was higher in ZA users, with an adjusted HR (adj) (95%CI) of 1.17 (1.04;1.32) and a higher all-cause mortality (adj HR 1.24 (1.15; 1.34)), however, there was no increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. In the comparison to untreated subjects, ZA users showed a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, adj HR 1.18 (1.05;1.32), arrhythmias adj HR 1.18 (1.06;1.31), and heart failure, adj HR 1.38 (1.24;1.54). Cardiovascular mortality was lower in ZA users (adj HR 0.87 (0.77; 0.98)) and risk of adverse skeletal outcomes was significantly higher, reflecting more severe osteoporosis in these patients. There was no association of cardiovascular risk with increasing exposure time. Sensitivity analyses produced similar findings with no substantial changes in event rates.

CONCLUSIONS

We noted an increased risk of heart failure, fractures and death among ZA users compared with oral BP. The risk of cardiovascular and skeletal outcomes was higher in ZA users than in matched population controls, but there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality in ZA users compared to oral BP or untreated controls. Despite propensity score matching, it is not possible to determine with certainty whether the increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes is consistent with a true drug effect or higher baseline risk in patients who begin ZA treatment.

Bisphosphonates and atrial fibrillation: revisiting the controversy

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely prescribed drugs used to treat osteoporosis, commonly arising in postmenopausal women and in chronic glucocorticoid use. Their mechanism of action is through inhibiting osteoclast-induced bone remodeling, and they also possess calcium sequestering properties. Common side effects involve the gastrointestinal system and rare but serious side effects, including osteonecrosis of the jaw. However, a link between BPs and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proposed, with early clinical trials, such as the Fracture Intervention Trial and the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial, reporting that BPs are associated with increased risk of AF. Nevertheless, subsequent studies have reported contrasting results, ranging from no effect of BPs to antiarrhythmic effects of BPs. Preclinical and electrophysiological studies on any proarrhythmic effect of BPs are limited in scope and number, but suggest possible mechanisms that include antiangionesis-related myocardial remodeling, calcium handling abnormalities, and inflammatory changes. Contrastingly, some studies indicate that BPs are antiarrhythmic by inhibiting fibrotic myocardial remodeling. In order to continue established clinical prescribing of BPs within absolute margins of safety, it will be necessary to systematically rule in/rule out these mechanisms. Thus, we discuss these studies and examine in detail the potential mechanistic links, with the aim of suggesting further avenues for research.

Systems pharmacology dissection of action mechanisms of Dipsaci Radix for osteoporosis

AIMS

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic metabolic bone disease characterized by bone mass decrease and microstructural degradation, which may increase the risk of bone fracture and leading to high morbidity. Dipsaci Radix (DR), one typical traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which has been applied in the treatment of OP with good therapeutic effects and few side effects. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of DR to treat OP have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aim to dissect the molecular mechanism of DR in the treatment of OP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systems pharmacology approach was employed to comprehensively dissect the action mechanisms of DR for the treatment of OP.

KEY FINDINGS

10 compounds were screened out as the potential active ingredients with excellent biological activity based on in silico ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) prediction model. Then, 36 key protein targets of 6 compounds were identified by systems drug targeting model (SysDT) and they were involved in several biological processes, such as osteoclast differentiation, osteoblast differentiation and anti-inflammation. The target-pathway network indicated that targets are mainly mapped in multiple signaling pathways, i.e., MAPK, Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), NF-κb and Toll-like receptor pathways. The in vitro results indicated that the compounds ursolic acid and beta-sitosterol effectively inhibited the osteoclast differentiation.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results systematically dissected that DR exhibits the therapeutic effects of OP by the regulation of immune system-related pathways, which provide novel perspective to drug development of OP.

Monoclonal antibodies against RANKL and sclerostin for myeloma-related bone disease: can they change the standard of care?

Introduction: Over 80% of the patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop myeloma bone disease (MBD) during the disease course. The clinical consequences include serious skeletal-related events (SRE) that impact survival and quality of life. Bisphosphonates are the mainstay in the treatment of MBD. Currently, new therapeutic strategies are being introduced and broaden the therapeutic options in MBD. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to summarize the current clinical management of MBD and present novel data regarding monoclonal antibodies against the receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and sclerostin that may change the clinical practice. Expert opinion: Our better understanding of the pathophysiology of MBD has identified several factors as potential therapeutic targets. Recent data have shown that the RANKL inhibitor denosumab constitutes a new promising option. The non-inferiority compared with bisphosphonates in terms of SRE prevention, the potential survival benefit, the convenience of subcutaneous administration, and the favorable toxicity profile makes denosumab a valuable alternative for physicians in the current treatment of MBD. Anti-sclerostin antibodies are currently under clinical development. Further investigations are needed to address open questions in the field including the value of anabolic agents combined with anti-resorptive and anti-MM drugs in MBD.

Side effects of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease

Osteoporosis is a common condition that leads to substantial morbidity and mortality and affects an increasing number of persons worldwide. Several pharmacological therapies that inhibit bone resorption, promote bone formation, or both, are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. The osteoanabolic treatment spectrum was recently expanded by the introduction of a novel bone-forming agent in the United States, and clinical trials indicate that a new class of bone anabolic therapy may become available. Both antiresorptive and bone anabolic therapies are associated with common and rare adverse effects, which are particularly important to address as these drugs are used for long-term treatment in numerous patients with a large proportion being elderly and/or having multimorbidity. In addition, antiresorptive drugs are used to inhibit bone resorption in patients with malignant hypercalcaemia or to prevent skeletal events in cancer patients, and bisphosphonates have been repurposed as a cancer preventive therapy. However, therapeutic doses are generally higher when antiresorptive drugs are used in the oncological setting, which influence the prevalence of adverse effects significantly. This review highlights key issues and controversies regarding adverse effects of currently available and emerging drugs used for osteoporosis and metastatic bone diseases.

Biology and treatment of myeloma related bone disease

Myeloma bone disease (MBD) is the most common complication of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeleton-related events (SREs) such as severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, vertebral collapse, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression that cause significant morbidity and mortality. It is due to an increased activity of osteoclasts coupled to the suppressed bone formation by osteoblasts. Novel molecules and pathways that are implicated in osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition have recently been described, including the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand/osteoprotegerin pathway, activin-A and the wingless-type signaling inhibitors, dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) and sclerostin. These molecules interfere with tumor growth and survival, providing possible targets for the development of novel drugs for the management of lytic disease in myeloma but also for the treatment of MM itself. Currently, bisphosphonates are the mainstay of the treatment of myeloma bone disease although several novel agents such as denosumab and sotatercept appear promising. This review focuses on recent advances in MBD pathophysiology and treatment, in addition to the established therapeutic guidelines.