Using coronary calcification to exclude an ischemic etiology for cardiomyopathy: A validation study and systematic review

Cardiac computed tomographic imaging in cardio-oncology: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS)

Cardio-Oncology is a rapidly growing sub-specialty of medicine, however, there is very limited guidance on the use of cardiac CT (CCT) in the care of Cardio-Oncology patients. In order to fill in the existing gaps, this Expert Consensus statement comprised of a multidisciplinary collaboration of experts in Cardiology, Radiology, Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging, Cardio-Oncology, Oncology and Radiation Oncology aims to summarize current evidence for CCT applications in Cardio-Oncology and provide practice recommendations for clinicians.

Innovative Approaches to Assess Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk Subjects: A Review From Clinical to Metabolomics Strategies

Current risk stratification strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) have low predictive value in asymptomatic subjects classified as intermediate cardiovascular risk. This is relevant because not all coronary events occur in individuals with traditional multiple risk factors. Most importantly, the first manifestation of the disease may be either sudden cardiac death or acute coronary syndrome, after rupture and thrombosis of an unstable non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaque, which was previously silent. The inaccurate stratification using the current models may ultimately subject the individual to excessive or insufficient preventive therapies. A breakthrough in the comprehension of the molecular mechanisms governing the atherosclerosis pathology has driven many researches toward the necessity for a better risk stratification. In this Review, we discuss how metabolomics screening integrated with traditional risk assessments becomes a powerful approach to improve non-invasive CAD subclinical diagnostics. In addition, this Review highlights the findings of metabolomics studies performed by two relevant analytical platforms in current use-mass spectrometry (MS) hyphenated to separation techniques and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) -and evaluates critically the challenges for further clinical implementation of metabolomics data. We also discuss the modern understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and the limitations of traditional analytical methods. Our aim is to show how discriminant metabolites originated from metabolomics approaches may become promising candidate molecules to aid intermediate risk patient stratification for cardiovascular events and how these tools could successfully meet the demands to translate cardiovascular metabolic biomarkers into clinical settings.

Computed tomography coronary angiography for patients with heart failure (CTA-HF): a randomized controlled trial (IMAGE-HF 1C)

AIMS

This randomized controlled trial sought to determine the financial impact of an initial diagnostic strategy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with heart failure (HF) of unknown aetiology. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is used to investigate HF patients. CCTA may be a non-invasive cost-effective alternative to ICA. This randomized controlled trial sought to determine the financial impact of an initial diagnostic strategy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with heart failure (HF) of unknown aetiology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre, international trial enrolled patients with HF of unknown aetiology. The primary outcome was the cost of CCTA vs. ICA strategies at 12 months. Clinical outcomes were also collected. An 'intention-to-diagnose' analysis was performed and a secondary 'as-tested' analysis was based on the modality received. Two hundred and forty-six patients were randomized (age = 57.8 ± 11.0 years, ejection fraction = 30.1 ± 10.1%). The severity of coronary artery disease was similar in both groups. In the 121 CCTA patients, 93 avoided ICA. Rates of downstream ischaemia and viability testing were similar for both arms. There were no significant differences in the composite clinical outcomes or quality of life measures. The cost of CCTA trended lower than ICA [CDN -$871 (confidence interval, CI -$4116 to $3028)]. Using an 'as-tested' analysis, CCTA was associated with a decrease in healthcare costs (CDN -$2932, 95% CI -$6248 to $746).

CONCLUSION

In patients with HF of unknown aetiology, costs were not statistically different between the CCTA and ICA strategies.

CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV

NCT01283659.