Impact of time of admission on short- and long-term mortality in the Vienna STEMI registry

Prognostic Impact of Admission Time in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: An ECLS-SHOCK Substudy

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) and the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be affected by the timing of hospital admission.

OBJECTIVES

The present ECLS-SHOCK substudy sought to investigate the prognostic impact of on-hours vs off-hours admission and the efficacy of ELCS according to the timing of hospital admission time in AMI-CS.

METHODS

Patients with AMI-CS enrolled in the multicenter, randomized ECLS-SHOCK trial from 2019 to 2022 were included. The prognosis of patients admitted during regular hours (ie, on-hours) was compared to patients admitted during off-hours. Thereafter, the prognostic impact of ECLS was investigated stratified by the timing of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, univariable, and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 417 patients enrolled in the ECLS-SHOCK trial, 48.4% (n = 202) were admitted during off-hours. Patients admitted during off-hours were younger (median age = 62 years [Q1-Q3: 55-69 years] vs 63 years [Q1-Q3: 58-71 years]; P = 0.036) and more commonly treated using initial femoral access for coronary angiography (79.0% [n = 158/200] vs 67.9% [n = 146/215]; P = 0.011). However, off-hours admission was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (off-hours vs on-hours: 46.0% [n = 93/202] vs 50.7% [n = 109/215]; OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.56-1.22). Furthermore, ECLS had no prognostic impact on 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with AMI-CS admitted during on-hours (50.5% [n = 52/103] vs 50.9% [n = 57/112]; P = 0.95; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58-1.68) or in patients admitted during off-hours (45.3% [n = 48/106] vs 46.9% [n = 45/96]; P = 0.82; OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.54-1.63). Finally, ECLS was associated with an increased risk of bleeding events, especially in patients admitted during on-hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis in AMI-CS was not affected by admission time with a similar effect of ECLS during on- and off-hours.

The association of off-hour vs. on-hour intensive care unit admission time with mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective multi-centre analysis

AIMS

Studies have shown a so-called off-hour effect for many different diseases, but data are scarce concerning cardiogenic shock. We therefore assessed the association of off-hour vs. on-hour intensive care unit admission with 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 1720 cardiogenic shock patients (666 admitted during off-hours) from two large university hospitals in Germany were included in retrospect. An admission during off-hours was associated with increased 30-day mortality compared to an admission during on-hours [crude mortality 48% vs. 41%, HR 1.17 (1.03-1.33), P = 0.017]. This effect remained significant after propensity score matching (P = 0.023). Neither patients with a combined SCAI stage D and E (P = 0.088) or C (P = 0.548) nor those requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = 0.114) had a higher mortality at off-hour admission. In contrast, those without veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [HR 1.17 (1.00-1.36), P = 0.049], without acute myocardial infarction [HR 1.27 (1.02-1.56), P = 0.029] or a with combined SCAI stage A and B [HR 2.23 (1.08-4.57), P = 0.025] had an increased mortality at off-hour admission.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an increased mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock admitted during off-hours, especially in those with a milder onset of disease. This stresses the importance of a thorough workup of each patient, especially at times of limited resources, the menace of underestimating the severity of cardiogenic shock, and the need for an improved 24×7 available risk stratification.

Effect of Admission and Onset Time on the Prognosis of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) has changed significantly over time. CS has become especially more common in the absence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), while this subset of patients was typically excluded from recent studies. Furthermore the prognostic impact of onset time and onset place due to CS has rarely been investigated.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do the place of CS onset (out-of-hospital, ie, primary CS vs in-hospital, ie, secondary CS) and the onset time of out-of-hospital CS (ie, on-hours vs off-hours admission) affect the risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective monocentric registry included consecutive patients with CS of any cause from 2019 until 2021. First, the prognostic impact of the place of CS onset (out-of-hospital, ie, primary CS vs during hospitalization, ie, secondary CS) was investigated. Thereafter, the prognostic impact of the onset time of out-of-hospital CS was investigated. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of causative AMI vs non-AMI was investigated. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier analyses, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-three patients with CS were included prospectively (64% with primary out-of-hospital CS). The place of CS onset was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality within the entire study cohort (secondary in-hospital CS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.532; 95% CI, 0.990-2.371; P = .06). However, increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was seen in patients with AMI related secondary in-hospital CS (HR, 2.087; 95% CI, 1.126-3.868; P = .02). Furthermore, primary out-of-hospital CS admitted during off-hours was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to primary CS admitted during on-hours (HR, 0.497; 95% CI, 0.302-0.817; P = .01), irrespective of the presence or absence of AMI.

INTERPRETATION

Primary and secondary CS were associated with comparable, whereas primary out-of-hospital CS admitted during off-hours was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05575856; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, SCOPUS, Europe PMC, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases that was finalized on March 15, 2021. The primary outcome was mortality comprising early (in-hospital), midterm (30 days to 1 year), and long-term mortality (>1 year). A total of 384,452 patients from 56 studies were included. The overall mortality of acute STEMI patients admitted during off-hours and regular hours were 6.1 and 6.7%, respectively. Patients admitted during off-hours had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared to those admitted during regular working hours ([relative risk or RR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval or CI, 1.00-1.14, p  = 0.06; I 2  = 45%, p  = 0.0009], [RR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.95-1.05, p  = 0.92; I 2  = 13%, p  = 0.26], and [RR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04, p  = 0.26; I 2  = 0%, p  = 0.76], respectively). Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were consistent across all subgroups ([women vs. men], [age >65 years vs. ≤65 years], and [Killip classification II to IV vs. Killip I]). Funnel plot was asymmetrical. However, Egger's test suggests no significance of small-study effects ( p  = 0.19). This meta-analysis showed that patients with acute STEMI who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours.

Association Between Out-of-Hour Admission and Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: Out-of-hour admission (on weekends, holidays, and weekday nights) has been associated with higher mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We conducted a meta-analysis to verify the association between out-of-hour admission and mortality (both short- and long-term) in AMI patients.

Design: This Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Data Sources: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to 27 May 2021.

Eligibility Criteria for Selected Studies: Studies of any design examined the potential association between out-of-hour admission and mortality in AMI.

Data Extraction and Synthesis: In total, 2 investigators extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias. Analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. The results are shown as odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). I² value was used to estimate heterogeneity. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Results: The final analysis included 45 articles and 15,346,544 patients. Short-term mortality (defined as either in-hospital or 30-day mortality) was reported in 42 articles (15,340,220 patients). Out-of-hour admission was associated with higher short-term mortality (OR 1.04; 95%CI 1.02–1.05; I² = 69.2%) but there was a significant statistical indication for publication bias (modified Macaskill's test P < 0.001). One-year mortality was reported in 10 articles (1,386,837 patients). Out-of-hour admission was also associated with significantly increased long-term mortality (OR 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04; I² = 66.6%), with no statistical indication of publication bias (p = 0.207). In the exploratory subgroup analysis, the intervention effect for short-term mortality was pronounced among patients in different regions (p = 0.04 for interaction) and socio-economic levels (p = 0.007 for interaction) and long-term mortality was pronounced among patients with different type of AMI (p = 0.0008 for interaction) or on different types of out-to-hour admission (p = 0.006 for interaction).

Conclusion: Out-of-hour admission may be associated with an increased risk of both short- and long-term mortality in AMI patients.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020182364).

Off-hours admission does not impact outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and with a first medical contact-to-device time within 90 min

Background:

It remains unclear whether the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) during off-hours are as favorable as those treated during on-hours, especially those with a first medical contact-to-device (FMC-to-device) time within 90 min. We aimed to determine whether off-hours admission impacted late outcomes in patients undergoing PPCI and with an FMC-to-device time ≤90 min.

Methods:

This multicenter retrospective study included 670 STEMI patients who underwent successful PPCI and had an FMC-to-device time ≤90 min from 19 chest pain centers in Beijing from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients were divided into on-hours group and off-hours group based on their arrival time. Baseline characteristics, clinical data, and key time intervals during treatment were collected from the Quality Control & Improvement Center of Cardiovascular Intervention of Beijing by the “Heart and Brain Green Channel” app.

Results:

Overall, the median age of the patients was 58.8 years and 19.9% (133/670) were female. Of these, 296 (44.2%) patients underwent PPCI during on-hours and 374 (55.8%) patients underwent PPCI during off-hours. Compared with the on-hours group, the off-hours group had a longer FMC-to-device time and fewer patients with FMC-to-device time ≤60 min (P < 0.05). During the mean follow-up period of 24 months, a total of 64 (9.6%) participants experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), with 28 (9.1%) in the on-hours group and 36 (9.6%) in the off-hours group (P > 0.05). According to the Cox regression analyses, off-hours admission was not a predictor of 2-year MACEs (P = 0.788). Similarly, the Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the risks of a MACE, all-cause death, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

This real-world, multicenter retrospective study demonstrated that for STEMI patients who underwent PPCI within 90 min, off-hours admission was safe, with no difference in the risk of 2-year MACEs compared with those with on-hours admission.

Association Between Off-hour Presentations and In-hospital Mortality for Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effect of the admission time (on-hours versus off-hours) on in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in a region without STEMI network.

Methods

We analysed in-hospital the mortality among 300 consecutive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with PPCI between March 2012 and February 2017. Patients were divided according to admission time into on-hours admission (08:00 AM until 08:00 PM on weekdays) versus off-hours admission (08:00 PM until 08:00 AM on weekdays and 24 h on weekends and holidays). Demographic and clinical data as well as in-hospital mortality were compared between the two groups.

Results

One hundred and seventy eight (59.3%) patients were admitted during on-hours, and 122 (40.7%) patients were presented in off-hours. The mean door-to-balloon time was 42.3 min in the off-hours group and 34.2 min in the on-hours group with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.39). The mortality rate was 3.9% at on-hours presentation versus 4.09% in off-hours admission (p = 0.58). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that off-hours presentation was not associated with in-hospital mortality. [odds ratio (OR) 0.74; 95% CI, 0.21–2.61, p = 0.64].

Conclusion

Despite no efficient STEMI network in present study, off-hour presentation had no significant impact on in-hospital prognosis in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI. Larger studies are warranted in order to determine the prognostic role of off-hour presentation in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI.

Comparison of the Characteristics of Coronary Interventions Performed During Day and Night Shifts in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Therapeutic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). If optimally performed, PCI reduces myocardial injury and improves the likelihood of a positive clinical outcome. Therefore, the equal quality of PCI throughout both day and night shifts is of paramount importance. Our aim was to compare urgent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary interventions performed during day and night shifts. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 144 patients who underwent coronary angiography for AMI over six months in a tertiary referral center working in 24/7 mode. The patients' characteristics, procedural data and the operator's experience in interventional cardiology were compared according to the time of intervention during a day shift (8 a.m. until 8 p.m., group A, n = 106) and night shift (from 8 p.m. until 8 a.m. next day, group B, n = 36). The baseline characteristics of the subjects of groups A and B were similar, except for a higher proportion of AMI without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) in patients who underwent coronary angiography during regular working hours compared to off-hours (58% vs. 34%, p < 0.05). The average time of diagnostic coronary angiography was longer by about 5 min during the day shift (28.5 ± 12.2 vs. 23.8 ± 8.9 min, p < 0.05), while other procedural data, including the arterial access route, the number of catheters needed and the contrast-medium volume, were similar. The use of additional diagnostic tools for coronary lesion assessment (intracoronary ultrasound or fractional flow reserve measurement) was almost twice as frequent during regular working hours (15% vs. 8%). Urgent therapeutic PCI on the culprit artery was performed in 79% and 89% of group A and B patients, respectively. The groups did not differ in procedural characteristics regarding the total interventional session, including both diagnostic angiography and therapeutic PCI, such as total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, stenting technique and total stent length. Coronary thrombectomy or rotational atherectomy were more frequently used in group A (27% vs. 15%, p = 0.16). The percentage of doctors with the least experience in interventional cardiology was, albeit insignificantly, lower during day shifts (31% vs. 42%). In conclusion, the majority of clinical and periprocedural characteristics appeared to be independent of intervention time, except for a longer duration of diagnostic coronary angiography during daytime. This finding could probably result from a higher proportion of NSTEMI patients frequently requiring additional angiographic projections and special techniques to properly identify the infarct-related artery during the day shift. Whether a tendency of less frequent use of additional tools at off-hours may also be due to a lower percentage of NSTEMI interventions at night, or whether this can be linked to lower availability of experienced operators, remains to be validated in a large study. The latter possibility, if confirmed, might encourage public health authorities and healthcare organizers to improve off-hours cathlab staffing with experienced interventionalists. Finally, additional obligatory training in special diagnostic and therapeutic invasive techniques might be advisable for the least experienced operators scheduled to work night shifts.

Predictors of transportation delay in patients with suspected ST-elevation-myocardial infarction in the VIENNA-STEMI network

OBJECTIVE

The emergency medical service (EMS) provides rapid pre-hospital diagnosis and transportation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) systems of care. Aim of the study was to assess temporal and regional characteristics of EMS-related delays in a metropolitan STEMI network.

METHODS

Patient call-to-arrival of EMS at site (call-to-site), transportation time from site to hospital (site-to-door), call-to-door, patient's location, month, weekday, and hour of EMS activation were recorded in 4751 patients referred to a tertiary center with suspicion of STEMI.

RESULTS

Median call-to-site, site-to-door, and call-to-door times were 9 (7-12), 39 (31-48), and 49 (41-59) minutes, respectively. The shortest transportation times were noted between 08:00 and 16:00 and in general on Sundays. They were significantly prolonged between midnight and 04:00, whereby the longest difference did not exceed 4 min in median. Patient's site of call had a major impact on transportation times, which were shorter in Central and Western districts as compared to Southern and Eastern districts of Vienna (p < 0.001 between-group difference for call-to-site, site-to-door, and call-to-door). After multivariable adjustment, patient's site of call was an independent predictor of call-to-site delay (p < 0.001). Moreover, age and hour of EMS activation were the strongest predictors of call-to-site, site-to-door, and call-to-door delays (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our Viennese STEMI network, the strongest determinants of pre-hospital EMS-related transportation delays were patient's site of call, patient's age, and hour of EMS activation. Due to the significant but small median time delays, which are within the guideline-recommended time intervals, no impact on clinical outcome can be expected.