Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: An updated meta-analysis

Different antithrombotic strategies after coronary artery bypass grafting to prevent adverse events: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with antithrombotic therapy in terms of postoperative adverse events; however, it is still unknown whether the early use of such drugs after CABG is safe and effective. In this study, we aim to evaluate the relationship between different postoperative antithrombotic strategies and in-hospital adverse events in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing isolated CABG due to coronary artery disease (CAD) between 2001 and 2012. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. The patients involved were divided into the ASA (aspirin 81 mg per day only) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg per day) group according to the antiplatelet strategy. Patients were also stratified into subgroups based on the type of anticoagulation. The in-hospital risk of bleeding and adverse events was investigated and compared between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the potential effects of a selection bias.

RESULTS

A total of 3274 patients were included in this study, with 2358 in the ASA group and 889 in the DAPT group. Following the PSM, no significant difference was seen in the risk of major bleeding between the two groups according to the PLATO, TIMI or GUSTO criteria. There was no difference in the postoperative mortality. In subgroup analysis, patients given anticoagulant therapy had an increased incidence of bleeding-related events. Multivariable analysis revealed that postoperative anticoagulant therapy and the early use of heparin, but not DAPT, were independent predictors of bleeding-related events.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative DAPT was not associated with an increased occurrence of bleeding-related events in patients undergoing isolated CABG and appears to be a safe antiplatelet therapy. The addition of anticoagulants to antiplatelet therapy increased the risk of bleeding and should be considered cautiously in clinical practice.

Antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: five year follow-up of randomised DACAB trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.

DESIGN

Five year follow-up of randomised Different Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (DACAB) trial.

SETTING

Six tertiary hospitals in China; enrolment between July 2014 and November 2015; completion of five year follow-up from August 2019 to June 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

500 patients aged 18-80 years (including 91 (18.2%) women) who had elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and completed the DACAB trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily (dual antiplatelet therapy; n=168), ticagrelor monotherapy 90 mg twice daily (n=166), or aspirin monotherapy 100 mg once daily (n=166) for one year after surgery. After the first year, antiplatelet therapy was prescribed according to standard of care by treating physicians.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularisation), analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. Time-to-event analysis was used to compare the risk between treatment groups. Multiple post hoc sensitivity analyses examined the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

Follow-up at five years for major adverse cardiovascular events was completed for 477 (95.4%) of 500 patients; 148 patients had major adverse cardiovascular events, including 39 in the dual antiplatelet therapy group, 54 in the ticagrelor monotherapy group, and 55 in the aspirin monotherapy group. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at five years was significantly lower with dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin monotherapy (22.6% v 29.9%; hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.99; P=0.04) and versus ticagrelor monotherapy (22.6% v 32.9%; 0.66, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.05). Results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ticagrelor dual antiplatelet therapy for one year after surgery reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at five years after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with aspirin monotherapy or ticagrelor monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03987373ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03987373.

Review of the Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base

Ticagrelor is a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor approved for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease, and low-moderate risk acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor on ischemic and bleeding outcomes for different indications and with varying treatment approaches. As a result, there is a large body of clinical evidence demonstrating different degrees of net clinical benefit compared with other platelet inhibitor drugs based on indication, patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment duration, and other factors. We provide a review of the major trials of ticagrelor in the context of other randomized trials of clopidogrel and prasugrel to organize the volume of available information, elevate corroborating and conflicting data, and identify potential gaps as areas for further exploration of optimal antiplatelet treatment.

Safety outcomes of anti-platelet therapy post coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is used to decrease the risk of graft failure post coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We aimed to compare dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with monotherapy along with a comparison of Aspirin, Ticagrelor, Aspirin+Ticagrelor (A+T) and Aspirin+Clopidogrel (A+C) to determine the major and minor bleeding risk, risk of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause mortality (ACM).

METHODS

Randomized Controlled Trials comparing the four groups were included. Odds ratio (OR) and Absolute Risk (AR) were employed to assess the mean and standard deviation (SD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Bayesian random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Risk difference and Cochran Q tests were used to calculate rank probability (RP) and heterogeneity, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 10 trials, consisting of 21 arms and 3926 patients. For the risk of major and minor bleed, A + T and Ticagrelor showed the lowest mean value of 0.040 (0.043) and 0.067 (0.073), respectively, and the highest RP of being the safest group. While a direct comparison between DAPT and monotherapy resulted in an OR of 0.57 [0.34, 0.95] for the risk of minor bleed. A + T was found to have the highest RP and the lowest mean value in terms of ACM, MI, and stroke.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was found between monotherapy or dual-antiplatelet therapy for the major bleeding risk safety outcome, however DAPT was found to have a significantly higher rate of minor bleeding complications post-CABG. DAPT should be considered as the antiplatelet modality of choice post-CABG.

Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left-Main Coronary Disease

BACKGROUND

The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary revascularization for left-main disease is still debated. The study aimed to characterize patients who received dual versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left-main disease and compare the outcomes of those patients.

RESULTS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 551 patients who were grouped into 2 groups: patients who received SAPT (n = 150) and those who received DAPT (n = 401). There were no differences in age ( P = 0.451), gender ( P = 0.063), smoking ( P = 0.941), diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.773), history of myocardial infarction ( P = 0.709), chronic kidney disease ( P = 0.615), atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.306), or cerebrovascular accident ( P = 0.550) between patients who received SAPT versus DAPT. DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome [87 (58%) vs. 273 (68.08%); P = 0.027], after off-pump CABG [12 (8%) vs. 73 (18.2%); P = 0.003] and in patients with radial artery grafts [1 (0.67%) vs. 32 (7.98%); P < 0.001]. While SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction [55 (36.67%) vs. 61 (15.21%); P < 0.001] and in patients with postoperative acute kidney injury [27 (18%) vs. 37 (9.23%); P = 0.004]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT for follow-up major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, -2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.8-16.7); P = 0.828]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT on follow-up all-cause mortality was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, 4.12 (CI, -11.1-19.32); P = 0.595]. There was no difference in bleeding between groups ( P = 0.666).

CONCLUSIONS

DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome, after off-pump CABG, and with radial artery grafts. SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction and acute kidney injury. Patients on DAPT after CABG for left-main disease had comparable major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and survival to patients on SAPT, with no difference in bleeding events.

Optimal antiplatelet strategy following coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an established revascularisation strategy for multivessel and left main coronary artery disease. Although aspirin is routinely recommended for patients with CABG, the optimal antiplatelet regimen after CABG remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacies and risks of different antiplatelet regimens (dual (DAPT) versus single (SAPT), and dual with clopidogrel (DAPT-C) versus dual with ticagrelor or prasugrel (DAPT-T/P)) after CABG.

METHODS

We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models and Review Manager (V.5.4).

RESULTS

Among the 2970 article abstracts screened, 215 full-text articles were reviewed and 38 studies totaling 77 447 CABG patients were included for analyses. DAPT compared with SAPT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR 0.65 with 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; p=0.002), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.84; p=0.008), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91; p=0.01), but higher rates of major (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; p=0.007) and minor bleeding (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.74; p=0.001) after CABG. DAPT-T/P compared with DAPT-C was associated with significantly lower all-cause (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.65; p≤0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.80; p=0.008), and no differences on other cardiovascular or bleeding outcomes after CABG.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CABG, DAPT compared with SAPT and DAPT-T/P compared with DAPT-C were associated with reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Additionally, DAPT was associated with reduction in MACCE, but higher rates of major and minor bleeding. An individualised approach to choosing antiplatelet regimen is necessary for patients with CABG based on ischaemic and bleeding risks.

Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Survey of UK Cardiac Surgeons

OBJECTIVE

Antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is important in postoperative medical management. Although cardiac surgeons are well-versed in the guidelines regarding discontinuation of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin and a P2Y12 antagonist) before CABG to minimize bleeding risk, there is considerable variability in DAPT dosing after CABG. The objective of this study was to explore the current trends in DAPT after CABG in the UK to improve understanding of the existing practice.

DESIGN

This study used an online survey with 9 questions about the use of DAPT after CABG. An invitation to participate was sent to all adult cardiac surgeons currently in practice in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants in this study were adult cardiac surgeons currently in practice in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

INTERVENTIONS

There were no interventions in this study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Responses were received from across the UK (85.4% UK; 4% each from Scotland and Northern Ireland, 1.3% from Wales) and 5.3% from the Republic of Ireland. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents performed between 50 and 100 CABGs per year. Ninety-one percent of the respondents prescribe DAPT postoperatively, but the choice of which patients receive it varied. Most responding surgeons used DAPT for selective patient cohorts, such as those with acute coronary syndrome (51%), diffuse coronary artery disease (42%), perioperative myocardial infarction (36%), coronary endarterectomy (31%), or when bypassing a stented coronary artery (23%). Thirty-eight percent of the respondents began all their patients with CABGs on DAPT. The most preferred P2Y12 antagonist was clopidogrel, used by 75% of respondents and introduced on day 1 after surgical revascularization (71%). The routine duration for DAPT is 12 months, which 78% of the respondents preferred. The main reason for not starting DAPT in those surveyed was the bleeding risk associated with DAPT (72%).

CONCLUSIONS

The survey uncovered variation in the use of DAPT after CABG. However, DAPT remains the preferred strategy after CABG in the UK. The study highlighted the need to develop standardized protocols for DAPT after CABG.

Antiplatelet therapy around CABG: the latest evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is unclear. We review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of DAPT after CABG and discuss potential novel antiplatelet strategies that reduce the risk of bleeding without loss of efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adding the potent P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor to aspirin for 1 year after CABG is associated with a reduction in the risk of vein graft failure, at the expense of an increased risk of clinically important bleeding. Ticagrelor monotherapy is not associated with better efficacy than aspirin alone, but is not associated with increased bleeding risk.

SUMMARY

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended after acute coronary syndrome events, but aspirin as single antiplatelet therapy remains the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy in stable ischemic heart disease because of a lack of solid evidence on the benefit of DAPT on clinical outcomes. Shorter duration DAPT, based on the pathophysiology of vein graft failure, may be a promising strategy that requires testing in adequately powered randomized trials.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Dual or single antiplatelet therapy after coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome (TACSI trial): Rationale and design of an investigator-initiated, prospective, multinational, registry-based randomized clinical trial

The TACSI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03560310) tests the hypothesis that 1-year treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor is superior to only ASA after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The TACSI trial is an investigator-initiated pragmatic, prospective, multinational, multicenter, open-label, registry-based randomized trial with 1:1 randomization to dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor or ASA only, in patients undergoing first isolated CABG, with a planned enrollment of 2200 patients at Nordic cardiac surgery centers. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of time to all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new coronary revascularization within 12 months after randomization. The primary safety end point is time to hospitalization due to major bleeding. Secondary efficacy end points include time to the individual components of the primary end point, cardiovascular death, and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes. High-quality health care registries are used to assess primary and secondary end points. The patients will be followed for 10 years. The TACSI trial will give important information useful for guiding the antiplatelet strategy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with CABG.

Graft thrombosis after coronary artery bypass surgery and current practice for prevention

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most frequently performed cardiac surgery worldwide. The reported incidence of graft failure ranges between 10% and 50%, depending upon the type of conduit used. Thrombosis is the predominant mechanism of early graft failure, occurring in both arterial and vein grafts. Significant advances have been made in the field of antithrombotic therapy since the introduction of aspirin, which is regarded as the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy for prevention of graft thrombosis. Convincing evidence now exists that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and a potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, effectively reduces the incidence of graft failure. However, this is achieved at the expense of an increase in clinically important bleeding, underscoring the importance of balancing thrombotic risk and bleeding risk when considering antithrombotic therapy after CABG. In contrast, anticoagulant therapy has proved ineffective at reducing the occurrence of graft thrombosis, pointing to platelet aggregation as the key driver of graft thrombosis. We provide a comprehensive review of current practice for prevention of graft thrombosis and discuss potential future concepts for antithrombotic therapy including P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and short-term DAPT.

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO), which occurs in 18. 4-52% of all patients referred for coronary angiography, represents one of the last barriers in coronary intervention. Approximately half of all patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), who undergo coronary angiography, are diagnosed with coronary CTO. In fact, these patients often develop recurrent symptoms and events, necessitating revascularization. Currently, there is neither a consensus nor developed guidelines for the treatment of CTO patients with prior CABG, and the prognosis of these patients remains unknown. In this review, we discuss current evidence and future perspectives on CTO revascularization in patients with prior CABG, with special emphasis on clinical and lesion characteristics, procedural success rates, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes.

2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The guideline for coronary artery revascularization replaces the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines, providing a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Coronary revascularization is an important therapeutic option when managing patients with coronary artery disease. The 2021 coronary artery revascularization guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with coronary artery disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests.

The impact of dual antiplatelet therapy administration on the risk of bleeding complications during coronary artery bypass surgery

Introduction

Dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and recurrence of adverse ischemic events in patients affected by acute coronary syndromes, but in patients urgently needing coronary artery surgery it can increase the risk of severe perioperative bleeding complications.

Aim

We evaluated the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on acetylsalicylic acid plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Material and methods

Three hundred and thirty-three patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with DAPT discontinuation > 72 hours or 3–4 days (group A, n = 159), 48–72 hours or 2–3 days (group B, n = 126), < 24 hours or 0–1 day (group C, n = 24) prior to CABG.

Results

Operative mortality was 1.87% (group A), 0.79% (group B), absent (group C). The incidence of mediastinal re-exploration was 1.25% or 2 patients (group A), 1.59% or 2 patients (group B), 8.33% or 4 patients (group C) (p = 0.01). Group C showed postoperatively a greater incidence of a blood loss greater than 500 ml at 6 hours and a blood loss from chest tube drainages significantly higher at 6 and 24 hours (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that ongoing ticagrelor intake in group C (HR = 42.4; p = 0.02) and group C (HR = 6.9; p = 0.04) were the only independent predictors of surgical re-exploration. In group C, surgical re-exploration was 2.56% or 1/39 patients taking clopidogrel, 33.3% or 3/9 patients taking ticagrelor (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Dual antiplatelet therapy ongoing until 1 day or 24 hours before CABG showed a significantly increased risk of bleeding complications in comparison with its discontinuation at 2–3 and > 3–4 days before, respectively. Major blood loss and surgical re-exploration were not associated with increased risk of operative all-cause or bleeding-related mortality. As expected, taking ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the short interval confers a higher risk of bleeding complications.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background The optimal antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting remains unclear. We evaluated the association of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel plus aspirin and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods and Results A total of 18 069 consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 2013 and 2017 were identified from a contemporary registry, and 10 854 (60.1%) received DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as determined by claimed prescriptions after surgery. Cox regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to examine the associations between DAPT and outcomes. Patients who received DAPT, compared with those who received aspirin monotherapy, had a lower incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 6 months (2.9% versus 4.2%; inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77; P<0.001) as well as death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.74), and stroke (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74). The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.78). Similar results were noted across multiple subgroups as well as when using different analytic methods. Conclusions Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, DAPT with clopidogrel plus aspirin as secondary prevention was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 6 months as compared with aspirin monotherapy, and there was no significant increase in major bleeding.

Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary revascularization is a commonly performed major procedure in the hospitals. Stroke is one of the dreaded complications after coronary revascularization procedures. The focus of this review is to understand the stroke risk in percutaneous cutaneous intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Available data show that PCI offers less procedural stroke risk compared to CABG although the survival benefits of CABG are better in certain scenarios. Innovative advancements in techniques, pre-procedural optimum medical therapy (OMT), intraoperative neuro-monitoring, and multidisciplinary post procedural care are the few strategies in early detection and reduce stroke risk. Despite several innovations and strategies, it is evident that there is not enough data available to make concrete conclusions related to stroke risk after coronary revascularization, which warrants further investigation.

Secondary Prevention Medications Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery-A Literature Review

Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is imperative in slowing the progression of atherosclerosis in both native and grafted vessels. Aspirin and statins remain the key medications for all patients without significant contraindications. The evidence for dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel is less convincing, but there is hope for newer antiplatelet agents, such as ticagrelor. Meanwhile, β-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors might only offer benefits to specific sub-groups. Post-CABG patients appear to have different medication needs to the general cardiovascular patient and respond differently. In this review, we cover the drug regimens proposed by recent guidelines and the evidence behind their use. Assessing the evidence behind these recommendations, we find that there is an unmet need in some areas for robust population-specific evidence. We hope that future research will address this gap.

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy post coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the gold standard treatment for patients with multivessel coronary heart disease. Although its use has proven long-term survival benefits, there is a relative degree of graft failure which increases morbidity and mortality rates.

DISCUSSION

This review discusses clinical outcomes following antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after CABG. There is wide variation of evidence about the use of clopidogrel or ticagrelor to aspirin postoperatively in relation to improving graft patency rates or clinical outcomes over the use of aspirin alone. These dual therapies may have significant protective effects in patients undergoing off-pump CABG. Recent studies suggest that superior outcomes may be attained by combining prasugrel with aspirin. Further research is needed to evaluate this, as well as compare the effectiveness of different dual antiplatelet regimens. There is weak evidence for post-CABG anticoagulation, with warfarin and rivaroxaban providing no protection against graft failure but decreasing long-term major adverse cardiac events. Anticoagulation seems to be indicated only in post-CABG patients at high risk of future ischemic events.

CONCLUSION

The use of dual anti-platelet therapy post coronary artery bypass surgery needs further research. Potentially, selective patient groups will benefit more from the addition of thienopyridine antiplatelets or anticoagulants to aspirin after CABG.

Occipital artery to p3 segment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass in treating a complex fusiform aneurysm

We provide a case report of a 58-year-old man who presented with a ruptured fusiform dissecting aneurysm located at the junction of the vertebral artery and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). Due to the lesion's complexity, a two-step approach was planned for revascularisation of PICA using the occipital artery (OA) prior to coiling embolisation. An end-to-side OA-PICA bypass was performed with implantation at the caudal loop of the p3 PICA segment. Fifteen days after the procedure, the aneurysm underwent stent-assisted coiling for successful obliteration of the aneurysm. The patient tolerated this procedure well and now at 1.5 years of follow-up remains free from any neurological deficits (modified Rankin Score 0). This case report illustrates one of the unique scenarios where both the vascular territory involved and morphological features of the aneurysm prohibited the use of more conventional means, necessitating the use of an arterial bypass graft for successful treatment of this lesion. As open vascular surgery is becoming less common in the age of endovascular coiling, our article uniquely reports on the combined use of both endovascular and microsurgical techniques to treat a complex aneurysm of the posterior circulation.

Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed

For the year 2018, more than 22,000 published references can be found in PubMed when entering the search term "cardiac surgery". As in the last 4 years, this review focusses on conventional cardiac surgery publications which provide important and interesting information especially relevant for non-surgical colleagues. Interventional techniques have been considered if they were published in the context of classic surgical techniques. We have again reviewed the fields of coronary revascularization and valve surgery and briefly touched on aortic surgery and surgery for terminal heart failure. For revascularization of complex coronary artery disease, bypass grafting was reconfirmed as gold standard and computer-tomographic angiography established equipoise for decision-making with classic angiography. For aortic valve treatment, some new longer-term outcomes from TAVI vs. SAVR trials confirmed equipoise of both treatments for high and medium risk. New information was provided for INR-management of mechanical aortic valves as well as long-term experiences for alternatives to mechanical valves (i.e., Ross and the relatively new Ozaki procedure). In the mitral and tricuspid field, prevalence data illustrate a significant amount of under-treatment for mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation and evidence for life prolonging-effects of surgery. Finally, elongation of the ascending aorta was identified as new risk factor for aortic dissection and 2 years outcome of the newest generation of left ventricular assist devices demonstrate impressive improvements in outcome. While this article attempts to summarize the most pertinent publications, it does not expect to be complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. As in recent years, it provides a condensed summary that is intended to give the reader "solid ground" for up-to-date decision-making in cardiac surgery and a stimulus for in-depth reading.