Digoxin, mortality, and cardiac hospitalizations in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: An AF-CHF analysis

Challenging and target-based shifting strategies for heart failure treatment: An update from the last decades

Heart failure (HF) is a major global health problem afflicting millions worldwide. Despite the significant advances in therapies and prevention, HF still carries very high morbidity and mortality, requiring enormous healthcare-related expenditure, and the search for new weapons goes on. Following initial treatment strategies targeting inotropism and congestion, attention has focused on offsetting the neurohormonal overactivation and three main therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists, β-adrenoceptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, have been the foundation of standard treatment for patients with HF. Recently, a paradigm shift, including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and ivabradine, has been added. Moreover, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, elamipretide, and omecamtiv mecarbil have come out as a next-generation therapeutic agent for patients with HF. Although these pharmacologic therapies have been significantly successful in relieving symptoms, there is still no complete cure for HF. We may be currently entering a new era of treatment for HF with animal experiments and human clinical trials assessing the value of antibody-based immunotherapy and gene therapy as a novel therapeutic strategy. Such tempting therapies still have some challenges to be addressed but may become a weighty option for treatment of HF. This review article will compile the paradigm shifts in HF treatment over the past dozen years or so and illustrate current landscape of antibody-based immunotherapy and gene therapy as a new therapeutic algorithm for patients with HF.

Combination therapy of beta-blockers and digoxin is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry

The effect of digoxin and beta-blockers on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality remains unclear. The study aimed to determine differences in cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and death rates among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were prescribed with beta-blockers, digoxin or combination therapy. Data from phase II/III of the prospective Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Anti-thrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) were analysed. The risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and death among patients with different prescriptions using COX proportional hazard regression was considered. Propensity score (PS) matching and weighting were further used to adjust for potential confounders of prescription use. A total of 14,201 patients [median age: 71.0 (IQR 64.0-77.0) years; 46.2% female] were recruited. After a median follow-up of 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.1) years, 864 MACE, and 988 all-cause deaths were recorded. The incidence rate (IR) of MACE was 22.4 (95%CI 21.0-24.0) per 1000 person-years, while the IR of all-cause death was 25.4 (95%CI 23.8-27.0) per 1000 person-years. After multivariate adjustment with Cox regression, the risk of MACE (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68) and the risk of all-cause death (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.04-1.57) were significantly higher in the combination therapy group, compared to the beta-blockers alone group. The risks of MACE and all-cause death remained significant in both PS matched and PS weighted cohort Among AF patients, combination therapy of beta-blockers and digoxin was associated with higher risks of MACE and all-cause death compared to beta-blockers alone.

Association of serum digoxin concentration with morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction of 45 % or below

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are common cardiovascular conditions linked to significant health burdens. This review aims to study the relationship of serum digoxin concentration and mortality and morbidity outcomes in defined population.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search of databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, from inception until 20th Aug 2023. Studies that explored the relationship between serum digoxin concentration and mortality, morbidity, or other clinical endpoints in AF and HFrEF patients (ejection fraction ≤45 %) were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

The selected studies exhibited a wide range of designs, patient cohorts, and measured outcomes. The association between serum digoxin concentration, mortality and morbidity endpoints like hospitalization rates and cardiovascular events were assessed in these studies. Despite the methodological diversity, our systematic review uncovered consistent trends across the studies, suggesting that elevated serum digoxin concentrations may correlate with higher mortality and morbidity in AF and HFrEF patients.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review emphasizes the need for cautious management of serum digoxin levels in patients with concurrent AF and HFrEF. While digoxin remains a valuable treatment for heart failure, its potential adverse effects on outcomes in this specific patient subgroup call for vigilant monitoring and individualized treatment approaches. Further research is required to elucidate the dose-response relationship and potential confounding factors influencing outcomes associated with serum digoxin concentration in AF and HFrEF patients. Clinicians should consider these findings when making therapeutic decisions to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Effect of digoxin on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without heart failure: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and 12 meta-analyses

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic umbrella review with meta-analysis to evaluate the certainty of evidence on mortality risk associated with digoxin use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 19 October 2021. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies investigating digoxin effects on mortality of adult patients with AF and/or HF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool and the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses by the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) tool.

RESULTS

Eleven studies accounting for 12 meta-analyses were included with a total of 4,586,515 patients. AMSTAR2 analysis showed a high quality in 1, moderate in 5, low in 2, and critically low in 3 studies. Digoxin was associated with an increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.14-1.25) with moderate certainty of evidence and with an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.06-1.33) with moderate certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis showed that digoxin was associated with all-cause mortality both in patients with AF alone (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.19-1.28) and in those with AF and HF (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.12-1.16).

CONCLUSION

Data from this umbrella review suggests that digoxin use is associated with a moderate increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in AF patients regardless of the presence of HF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325321).

Therapeutic opportunities for senolysis in cardiovascular disease

Cellular senescence within the cardiovascular system has, until recently, been understudied and unappreciated as a factor in the development of age-related cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction and atherosclerosis. This is in part due to challenges with defining senescence within post-mitotic cells such as cardiomyocytes. However, recent evidence has demonstrated senescent-like changes, including a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), in cardiomyocytes in response to ageing and cell stress. Other replicating cells, including fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells, within the cardiovascular system have also been shown to undergo senescence and contribute to disease pathogenesis. These findings coupled with the emergence of senolytic therapies, to target and eliminate senescent cells, have provided fascinating new avenues for management of several age-related cardiovascular diseases with high prevalence. In this review, we discuss the role of senescent cells within the cardiovascular system and highlight the contribution of senescence cells to common cardiovascular diseases. We discuss the emerging role for senolytics in cardiovascular disease management while highlighting important aspects of senescence biology which must be clarified before the potential of senolytics can be fully realized.

Utilization of Digoxin among Hospitalized Older Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation in Thailand: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

Background

Digoxin is used to control heart rate in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its use is often limited in older patients, as they are prone to digoxin toxicity. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of digoxin use, investigate the factors associated with digoxin use, and explore the association between digoxin use and clinical outcomes in older Thai patients with HF and AF.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data obtained from an electronic medical records database. We performed logistic regression analysis to determine the prevalence of digoxin use at index discharge and the factors associated with its use. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization with digoxin use.

Results

Of the 640 patients assessed, 107 (16.72%) were prescribed digoxin before discharge. The factors negatively associated with digoxin use included high serum creatinine level (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.65) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) (AOR=0.52; 95% CI, 0.30–0.88). The factors positively associated with digoxin use were the use of diuretics (AOR=2.65; 95% CI, 1.60–4.38) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) (AOR=2.24; 95% CI, 1.18–4.27). We observed no significant association between digoxin use and clinical outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio=1.00; 95% CI, 0.77–1.30).

Conclusion

Digoxin use was prevalent among older patients with HF and AF. Patients with high serum creatinine or IHD were less likely to be prescribed digoxin, whereas those using diuretics or MRAs were more likely to be prescribed digoxin. Although digoxin use was not uncommon among older patients, it was prescribed with caution among Thai patients hospitalized with HF and AF.

Effect of Digoxin Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background: Whether digoxin is associated with increased mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the risk of mortality and clinical effects of digoxin use in patients with AF.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify eligible studies comparing all-cause mortality of patients with AF taking digoxin with those not taking digoxin, and the length of follow-up was at least 6 months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled.

Results: A total of 29 studies with 621,478 patients were included. Digoxin use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in all patients with AF (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13–1.22, P < 0.001), especially in patients without HF (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11–1.47, P < 0.001). There was no significant association between digoxin and mortality in patients with AF and HF (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99–1.14, P = 0.110). In all patients with AF, regardless of concomitant HF, digoxin use was associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.23–1.60, P < 0.001) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.50, P < 0.001), and digoxin use had no significant association with all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.92–1.39, P = 0.230).

Conclusion: We conclude that digoxin use is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and SCD, and it does not reduce readmission for AF, regardless of concomitant HF. Digoxin may have a neutral effect on all-cause mortality in patients with AF with concomitant HF.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.ukPROSPERO.