Association between the E-wave propagation index and left ventricular thrombus formation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Incidence of left ventricular thrombus following STEMI in the modern era via multimodality imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a significant complication in STEMI. Previous studies were conducted prior to modern timely percutaneous reperfusion networks. Current expert opinion suggests incidence in the current era has decreased. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand the incidence and diagnosis of LVT in patients with STEMI treated with timely percutaneous techniques as assessed by multimodality imaging.

Methods

Cochrane, EMBASE, LILACS, and MEDLINE were searched over the last 10 years only including studies using contemporary techniques. The primary outcome was detection of LVT in patients via echocardiogram with or without contrast or Cardiac MRI (cMRI) following STEMI (both anterior and any territory) treated with PCI. Data was pooled across studies and statistical analysis was conducted via random effects model.

Results

31 studies were included. 18 studies included data on any territory STEMI, totaling 14,172 patients, and an incidence of 5.6% [95% CI 4.3-7.0]. 18 studies were included in analysis for anterior STEMI, totaling 7382 patients and incidence of 12.7% [95% CI 9.8-15.6]. Relative to cMRI as a gold standard, the sensitivity of non-contrast echocardiography to detect LVT was 58.2% [95% CI 46.6-69.2] with a specificity of 97.8% [95% CI 96.3-98.8].

Conclusions

Incidence of LVT in STEMI patients treated with contemporary timely percutaneous revascularization is in keeping with historical data and remains significant, suggesting this remains an ongoing issue for further investigation. Numerically, both cMRI and contrast echo detected more LVT compared to non-contrast echo in any-territory STEMI patients.

Factors predicting resolution of left ventricular thrombus in different time windows after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious complication after myocardial infarction. However, due to its asymptomatic nature, early detection is challenging. We aimed to explore the differences in clinical correlates of LVT found in acute to subacute and chronic phases of myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We collected data from 153 patients who were diagnosed with LVT after myocardial infarction at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2013 to December 2022. Baseline information, inflammatory markers, transthoracic echocardiograph (TTE) data and other clinical correlates were collected. Patients were categorized into acute to subacute phase group (< 30 days) and chronic phase group (30 days and after) according to the time at which echocardiograph was performed. The resolution of thrombus within 90 days is regarded as the primary endpoint event. We fitted logistic regression models to relating clinical correlates with phase-specific thrombus resolution.

RESULTS

For acute to subacute phase thrombus patients: C-reactive protein levels (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.918-0.983, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with thrombus resolution. For chronic phase thrombus patients: anticoagulant treatment was associated with 5.717-fold odds of thrombus resolution (OR: 5.717, 95% CI: 1.543-21.18, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of CRP were associated with lower likelihood of LVT resolution in acute phase myocardial infarction; Anticoagulant therapy is still needed for thrombus in the chronic stage of myocardial infarction.

Assessment of Blood Flow Transport in the Left Ventricle Using Ultrasound. Validation Against 4-D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference technique for analyzing blood transport in the left ventricle (LV), but similar information can be obtained from ultrasound. We aimed to validate ultrasound-derived transport in a head-to-head comparison against 4D flow CMR. In five patients and two healthy volunteers, we obtained 2D + t and 3D + t (4D) flow fields in the LV using transthoracic echocardiography and CMR, respectively. We compartmentalized intraventricular blood flow into four fractions of end-diastolic volume: direct flow (DF), retained inflow (RI), delayed ejection flow (DEF) and residual volume (RV). Using ultrasound we also computed the properties of LV filling waves (percentage of LV penetration and percentage of LV volume carried by E/A waves) to determine their relationships with CMR transport. Agreement between both techniques for quantifying transport fractions was good for DF and RV (Ric [95% confidence interval]: 0.82 [0.33, 0.97] and 0.85 [0.41, 0.97], respectively) and moderate for RI and DEF (Ric= 0.47 [-0.29, 0.88] and 0.55 [-0.20, 0.90], respectively). Agreement between techniques to measure kinetic energy was variable. The amount of blood carried by the E-wave correlated with DF and RV (R = 0.75 and R = 0.63, respectively). Therefore, ultrasound is a suitable method for expanding the analysis of intraventricular flow transport in the clinical setting.

Left ventricular thrombus in ischaemic heart disease: diagnosis, treatment, and gaps of knowledge

Although the management of ischaemic heart disease has markedly improved over the last decades, left ventricular thrombus remains a serious finding in patients with myocardial infarction. Routine diagnostic detection of left ventricular thrombus relies mainly on echocardiography; however, cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a method with higher diagnostic accuracy, while cardiac computed tomography angiography represents a valuable alternative modality. To reduce the left ventricular thrombus-associated morbidity and mortality, optimal selection of anticoagulation is warranted after balancing the risk of bleeding. In this review, we will discuss contemporary diagnostic modalities to detect left ventricular thrombus in ischaemic heart disease and summarize evidence on risk stratification and therapy. In addition, we propose a novel diagnosis, follow-up imaging, and treatment algorithm. Further, we identify knowledge gaps at different levels to address emerging research questions and to refine the design of future studies aiming to improve the management of patients in this clinical setting.