Myocardial deformation pattern in left ventricular non-compaction: Comparison with dilated cardiomyopathy

Multimodality Imaging and Biomarker Approach to Characterize the Pathophysiology of Heart Failure in Left Ventricular Non-Compaction with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) is still a controverted entity. We aimed to characterize structural and functional changes in LVNC with heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF).

METHODS

We enrolled 21 patients with LVNC and HFpEF and 21 HFpEF controls. For all patients, we performed CMR, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and biomarker assessment for HFpEF (NT-proBNP), for myocardial fibrosis (Galectin-3), and for endothelial dysfunction [ADAMTS13, von Willebrand factor, and their ratio]. By CMR, we assessed native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) for each LV level (basal, mid, and apical). By STE, we assessed longitudinal strain (LS), globally and at each LV level, base-to-apex gradient, LS layer by layer, from epicardium to endocardium, and transmural deformation gradient.

RESULTS

In the LVNC group, mean NC/C ratio was 2.9 ± 0.4 and the percentage of NC myocardium mass was 24.4 ± 8.7%. LVNC patients, by comparison with controls, had higher apical native T1 (1061 ± 72 vs. 1008 ± 40 ms), diffusely increased ECV (27.2 ± 2.9 vs. 24.4 ± 2.5%), with higher values at the apical level (29.6 ± 3.8 vs. 25.2 ± 2.8%) (all p < 0.01); they had a lower LS only at the apical level (-21.4 ± 4.4 vs. -24.3 ± 3.2%), with decreased base-to-apex gradient (3.8 ± 4.7 vs. 6.9 ± 3.4%) and transmural deformation gradient (3.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.8 ± 1.0%). LVNC patients had higher NT-proBNP [237 (156-489) vs. 156 (139-257) pg/mL] and Galectin-3 [7.3 (6.0-11.5) vs. 5.6 (4.8-8.3) ng/mL], and lower ADAMTS13 (767.3 ± 335.5 vs. 962.3 ± 253.7 ng/mL) and ADAMTS13/vWF ratio (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LVNC patients with HFpEF have diffuse fibrosis, which is more extensive at the apical level, explaining the decrease in apical deformation and overexpression of Galectin-3. Lower transmural and base-to-apex deformation gradients underpin the sequence of myocardial maturation failure. Endothelial dysfunction, expressed by the lower ADAMTS13 and ADAMTS13/vWF ratio, may play an important role in the mechanism of HFpEF in patients with LVNC.

Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Spectrum in Adults and Children: From a Morphological Trait to a Structural Muscular Disease

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is an extremely heterogeneous disorder with a highly variable clinical presentation, morphologic appearance at imaging testing, and prognosis. It is still unclear whether LVNC should be classified as a separate cardiomyopathy or if it is a mere morphological trait shared by many phenotypically distinct cardiomyopathies. Moreover, the hypertrabeculated phenotype may be reversible in some cases, possibly reflecting the left ventricular physiological response of the cardiac muscle to chronic overload. The current diagnostic criteria have several limitations, leaving many patients in a grey area. Here, we review the available literature on LVNC in order to provide an overview of the current knowledge on this complex disorder.

Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy-History and Current Knowledge for Clinical Practice

Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) has gained increasing attention over the past twenty years, but in daily clinical practice NCCM is still rarely considered. So far, there are no generally accepted diagnostic criteria and some groups even refuse to acknowledge it as a distinct cardiomyopathy, and grade it as a variant of dilated cardiomyopathy or a morphological trait of different conditions. A wide range of morphological variants have been observed even in healthy persons, suggesting that pathologic remodeling and physiologic adaptation have to be differentiated in cases where this spongy myocardial pattern is encountered. Recent studies have uncovered numerous new pathogenetic and pathophysiologic aspects of this elusive cardiomyopathy, but a current summary and evaluation of clinical patient management are still lacking, especially to avoid mis- and overdiagnosis. Addressing this issue, this article provides an up to date overview of the current knowledge in classification, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations and diagnostic evaluation, including genetic testing, treatment and prognosis of NCCM.

The role of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a heterogeneous entity and, in reality, a likely spectrum of disease which is clinically associated with arrhythmia, thromboembolic complications and sudden cardiac death. With the emergence of cardiac MRI (cMRI), the phenotype is increasingly more prevalent, resulting in clinical uncertainty regarding prognosis and management. The currently accepted hypothesis suggests an early embryonic arrest of the normal, sequential myocardial compaction process. LVNC is observed in isolation or in association with congenital heart disease, neuromuscular disease or a vast array of genetic cardiomyopathies. Definition of the entity varies among international society guidelines with differences both within and between imaging modalities, predominantly echocardiography and cMRI. Long-term prognostic data are emerging but due to the intrinsic variability in reported prevalence, selection bias and lack of pathological to prognostic correlation, there are many uncertainties regarding clinical management. This review seeks to clarify the role of multimodality imaging in diagnosis and management of the disease. We discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the current diagnostic criteria, as well as the nuances in diagnosis using the available imaging modalities.

Role of deformation imaging in left ventricular non-compaction and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an Indian perspective

BACKGROUND

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has emerged as a novel feasible tool for the assessment of left ventricular rotational parameters. Since hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM) shares morphologic features with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), we used this imaging modality to compare rotational mechanics between these two entities.

RESULTS

We compared global and regional LV function and rotational mechanics between LVNC, HCM, and healthy subjects using STE. Longitudinal strain and torsion were obtained from echocardiographic images from parasternal short axis as well as standard LV apical views. Twelve patients with LVNC [mean age 46.12 ± 14.66 years; median 47.5 IQR (39.25-58.5) years] were compared with 18 HCM patients [mean age 49.48± 17.22 years; median 56 IQR (33-65) years] and 18 healthy subjects [mean age: 51.50± 12.51 years; median 51(45.75-58) years]. LVNC group showed a significantly reduced longitudinal strain at the apical region compared to HCM group (- 12.18 ± 6.25 vs - 18.37 ± 3.67; P < 0.05). Rigid body rotation(RBR) was found in 50% of patients whereas the other half had a normal rotation at the apex and the base. Among the patients with RBR, all patients had a uniform counterclockwise rotation.

CONCLUSION

Longitudinal strain was impaired in both the forms of cardiomyopathy; however, LVNC showed a more significant reduction in the apical region compared to patients with HCM suggesting a development abnormality in these regions. A reduction in left ventricular torsion was specifically noted among patients with LVNC with a uniform anticlockwise rotation of LV base and apex.