Intracoronary administration of nicorandil during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Impact on restoration of regional myocardial perfusion in reperfused myocardium during the subacute phase of myocardial infarction

Effects of nicorandil infusion on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris and percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but is associated with some serious complications. Nicorandil is an anti‐anginal agent acting to improve microvascular circulation and to increase coronary blood flow. The objective of this article is to evaluate the effects of intracoronary injection followed with continuous intravenous injection of nicorandil on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UA) undergoing PCI.

Methods

A single‐center, self‐controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2019 and April 2019. Sixty‐three consecutive patients with UA who received coronary angiography and selective PCI were enrolled. ECG was recorded and analyzed before and 24 hr after nicorandil infusion.

Results

Patients were divided into three groups: control group (n = 23, aged 63.43 ± 12.55 years), short‐term, and prolonged use with nicorandil group (n = 20 and 20, aged 66.45 ± 8.06 years and 65.80 ± 9.49 years, respectively). Clinical characteristics and ECG parameters were similar before PCI among three groups (p > .05). In nicorandil treatment groups, intervals of QTd and Tp‐e in patients post‐PCI were significantly shorter than that in control and pre‐PCI (p < .05).

Conclusions

Nicorandil infusion reduces QTd and Tp‐e interval in patients with UA. Further studies will be needed to determine whether these electrophysiological changes are associated with a reduction of ventricular arrhythmias and improved outcomes.

Effect of sequential nicorandil on myocardial microcirculation and short-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing coronary intervention

Background

This study aims to observe the effects of the intracoronary and peripheral venous administration of nicorandil for the postoperative myocardial microcirculation and short-term prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment.

Methods

A total of 140 STEMI patients were divided into three groups according to different patterns of administration: sequential nicorandil group, intracoronary nicorandil group and control group. The main observation indexes included coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion immediately after PPCI, while the secondary observation indexes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the period of hospitalization.

Results

After PPCI, the difference in the proportion of patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.036), where this proportion was higher in the sequential nicorandil group and intracoronary nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.022 and P=0.047); The difference in corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.022), where CTFC was lower in the sequential nicorandil group and intracoronary nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.010, P=0.031); The differences in the proportion of patients with complete ST resolution (STR) and advancing of enzyme peak time to within 12 h between each two groups were statistically significant (P<0.001), where this proportion was the highest in the sequential nicorandil group; The difference in the CK-MB peak among the three groups was statistically significant (P=0.036), where the CK-MB peak was lower in the sequential nicorandil group than in the control group (P=0.012); The difference in the incidence of MACE between each two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001), where this incidence was the lowest in the sequential nicorandil group; The differences in the proportion of patients with advancing of enzyme peak time to within 14 h and LVEF among the three groups were not statistically significant (P=0.722 and P=0.284).

Conclusions

Compared with intracoronary use alone, the intracoronary and peripheral intravenous use of nicorandil can better improve myocardial microcirculation and short-term prognosis.