Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Triggers on Long-Term Outcomes of a Second Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers, including non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci, contributes to improved procedural outcomes. However, the clinical significance of an AF trigger ablation during second CA procedures for nonparoxysmal AF is unknown. Methods and Results: We enrolled 94 patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing a second CA. Intracardiac cardioversion during AF using high-dose isoproterenol was performed to determine the presence or absence of AF triggers. PV re-isolations were performed if PV potentials recurred, and if AF triggers appeared from any non-PV sites, additional ablation was added to those sites. We investigated the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) >3 months post-CA. Of the 94 enrolled patients, AF triggers were identified in 65 (69.1%), and of those with AF triggers, successful elimination of the triggers was achieved in 47 patients (72.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that no observed AF triggers were a significant predictor of AAR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-3.46, P=0.019). In a subanalysis of the patients with AF triggers, multivariate analysis showed that unsuccessful trigger ablation was significantly associated with AAR (HR 5.84, 95% CI 2.79-12.22, P<0.01). Conclusions: Having no observed AF triggers during a second CA session significantly increased the risk of AAR, as did unsuccessful CA of AF triggers.

Role of electroanatomical mapping-guided superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients without provoked superior vena cava triggers: a randomized controlled study

AIMS

Data about whether empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (SVCI) improves the success rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) are conflicting. This study sought to first investigate the characteristics of SVC-triggered atrial fibrillation and secondly investigate the impact of electroanatomical mapping-guided SVCI, in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), on the outcome of PAF ablation in the absence of provoked SVC triggers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 130 patients undergoing PAF ablation underwent electrophysiological studies before ablation. In patients for whom SVC triggers were identified, SVCI was performed in addition to CPVI. Patients without provoked SVC triggers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to CPVI plus SVCI or CPVI only. The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting over 30 s after a 3-month blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 12 months after ablation. Superior vena cava triggers were identified in 30 (23.1%) patients with PAF. At 12 months, 93.3% of those with provoked SVC triggers who underwent CPVI plus SVCI were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias. In patients without provoked SVC triggers, SVCI, in addition to CPVI, did not increase freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (87.9 vs. 79.6%, log-rank P = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

Electroanatomical mapping-guided SVCI, in addition to CPVI, did not increase the success rate of PAF ablation in patients who had no identifiable SVC triggers.

REGISTRATION

ChineseClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2000034532.

Hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved significantly, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) becoming an established treatment. However, the outcomes following catheter ablation for persistent AF remain unsatisfactory. Hybrid catheter-surgical ablation has emerged as a therapeutic approach for persistent AF, combining the strengths of both interventions. The purpose of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the current state of knowledge regarding hybrid ablation for AF.

Methods

A thorough PubMed search using the terms "hybrid ablation", "atrial fibrillation", "catheter ablation", and "guideline on cardiology" within the timeframe of 1980 to 2024 resulted in 138,969 articles. Consensus on the selected articles was reached through a series of structured meetings and discussions.

Key Content and Findings

PVI has demonstrated higher sinus rhythm maintenance rates, especially for paroxysmal AF. However, the efficacy is not as high for persistent AF. Additional ablation strategies, such as linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation, low voltage zone ablation as well as posterior wall isolation, lack consistent evidence of effectiveness. Hybrid ablation, involving collaboration between cardiac surgeons and electrophysiologists, presents a promising alternative for hard-to-treat AF. Recent studies report favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation, with atrial arrhythmia-free rates ranging from 53.5% to 76%, surpassing those of catheter ablation alone, which might result from better lesion durability or intervention for non-PV foci and left atrial appendage excision or closure during hybrid ablation. The rate of complications associated with hybrid ablation is higher than catheter ablation alone.

Conclusions

While favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation for persistent AF have been reported, it is not recommended for all AF patients due to its invasiveness compared to catheter ablation. Additionally, some patients with persistent AF maintain sinus rhythm with catheter ablation alone. More clinical data are needed to determine which patients are suitable candidates for hybrid ablation.

A novel ablation strategy for recurrent atrial fibrillation: Fractionated signal area in the atrial muscle ablation 1-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) is sometimes challenging due to non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci. Fractionated signal area in the atrial muscle (FAAM) is a valid predictor of the location of non-PV foci. FAAM ablation has the potential to decrease the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with recurrent AF. We compared the clinical impact of FAAM ablation for recurrent AF, using 1 year follow up date.

METHODS

A total of 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic recurrent AF who underwent catheter ablation specifically targeting non-PV foci as FAAM-guided ablation (n = 113) and non-FAAM-guided ablation (n = 117) were retrospectively analyzed. FAAM was assigned a parameter (peaks slider, which indicates the number of components of fractionated signals), ranging from 1 to 15, indicating the location of the FAAM (1: largest, 15: smallest). FAAM-guided ablation was performed by ablating FAAM until none inducibility of non-PV foci. On the other hand, non-FAAM-guided ablation was performed via linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation, superior vena cava isolation, and focal ablation according to the location of the non-PV foci. The RHYTHMIA system was used to perform all the procedures. The primary endpoints were AF recurrence, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia.

RESULTS

After a 1-year follow up, freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was achieved in 90.3% and 75.2% of patients in the FAAM and non-FAAM groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.438 [95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.788], p  =  .005).

CONCLUSIONS

FAAM ablation showed a promising decrease in the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with recurrent AF during a 1-year follow-up.

Freedom from atrial arrhythmia and other clinical outcomes at 5 years and beyond after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is now a mainstream procedure although long-term outcomes are uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural outcomes at 5 years and beyond.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed and Embase and after the screening, identified 73 studies (67 159 patients) reporting freedom from atrial arrhythmia, all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding at ≥5 years after AF ablation. The pooled mean age was 59.7y, 71.5% male, 62.2% paroxysmal AF, and radiofrequency was used in 78.1% of studies. Pooled incidence of freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years was 50.6% (95%CI 45.5-55.7%) after a single ablation and 69.7% [95%CI (confidence interval) 63.8-75.3%) after multiple procedures. The incidence was higher among patients with paroxysmal compared with non-paroxysmal AF after single (59.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.002) and multiple (80.8% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001) ablations but was comparable between radiofrequency and cryoablation. Pooled incidences of other outcomes were 6.0% (95%CI 3.2-9.7%) for death, 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.7%) for stroke, and 1.2% (95%CI 0.8-2.0%) for major bleeding at 5 years. Beyond 5 years, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence remained largely stable (52.3% and 64.7% after single and multiple procedures at 10 years), while the risk of stroke and bleeding increased over time.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 70% of patients having multiple ablations remained free from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years, with the incidence slightly decreasing beyond this period. Risk of death, stroke, and major bleeding at 5 years were low but increased over time, emphasizing the importance of long-term thromboembolism prevention and bleeding risk management.

Efficacy, Safety and Feasibility of Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: An Up-to-Date Review

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation; yet, the role of arrhythmogenic superior vena cava (SVC) is increasingly recognized and different ablation strategies have been employed in this context. SVC can act as a trigger or perpetuator of AF, and its significance might be more pronounced in patients undergoing repeated ablation. Several cohorts have examined efficacy, safety and feasibility of SVC isolation (SVCI) among AF patients. The majority of these studies explored as-needed SVCI during index PVI, and only a minority of them included repeated ablation subjects and non-radiofrequency energy sources. Studies of heterogeneous design and intent have explored both empiric and as-needed SVCI on top of PVI and reported inconclusive results. These studies have largely failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit in terms of arrhythmia recurrence, although safety and feasibility are undisputable. Mixed population demographics, small number of enrollees and short follow-up are the main limitations. Procedural and safety data are comparable between empiric SVCI and as-needed SVCI, and some studies suggested that empiric SVCI might be associated with reduced AF recurrences in paroxysmal AF patients. Currently, no study has compared different ablation energy sources in the setting of SVCI, and no randomized study has addressed as-needed SVCI on top of PVI. Furthermore, data regarding cryoablation are still in their infancy, and regarding SVCI in patients with cardiac devices more safety and feasibility data are needed. PVI non-responders, patients undergoing repeated ablation and patients with long SVC sleeves could be potential candidates for SVCI, especially via an empiric approach. Although many technical aspects remain unsettled, the major question to answer is which clinical phenotype of AF patients might benefit from SVCI?

Spatial relationship of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation identified by a unipolar-based automated algorithm to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms and atrial low voltage areas

INTRODUCTION

Spatial characteristics of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by unipolar-based panoramic mapping software (CARTOFINDER) remain unclear. We evaluated spatial characteristics of bi-atrial AF localized sources in relation to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms (CFAEs) and atrial low voltage area (LVAs) (≤0.35 mV during AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial voltage, CFAE, and CARTOFINDER mapping before the beginning of ablation (18 [90%] patients, initial procedure; 2 [10%] patients, repeat procedure). CFAEs were recorded using the interval confidence level (ICL) mode and defined as sites with a confidence level of ≥80% of maximal ICL number. We elucidated the following: (1) differences in the rate of AF localized sources and CFAEs inside or outside the atrial LVAs; (2) distribution of AF localized sources and CFAEs; and (3) distance between the closest points of AF localized sources and CFAEs. A total of 270 AF localized sources and 486 CFAEs were identified in 20 patients. AF localized sources were confirmed more often outside atrial LVAs than CFAEs (71% vs. 46% outside LVA, p < .001). AF localized sources and CFAEs were diffusely distributed without any tendency in bi-atria. Mean distance between closest AF localized sources and CFAEs was 22 ± 8 mm.

CONCLUSION

AF localized sources identified by CARTOFINDER are different therapeutic targets as compared to CFAEs and could be confirmed both inside and outside atrial LVAs.

Significance of mitral L-waves in predicting late recurrences of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

The mitral L-wave, a prominent mid-diastolic filling wave in echocardiographic examinations, is associated with severe left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. The relationship between the mitral L-wave and outcome of catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of mitral L-waves on AF recurrence after CA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and observational study in a single center. One hundred forty-six patients (mean age; 63.9 [56.0-72.0] years, 71.9% male) including 66 non-paroxysmal AF patients (45.2%) who received a first CA were enrolled. The mitral L-waves were defined as a distinct mid-diastolic flow velocity with a peak velocity ≥20 cm/s following the E wave in the echocardiographic examinations before CA. The patients enrolled were divided into groups with (n = 31, 21.2%) and without (n = 115, 78.8%) mitral L-waves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the predictive factors of late recurrences of AF (LRAFs), which meant AF recurrence later than 3 months after the CA.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 28.8 (15.0-35.8) months, the ratio of LRAFs in patients with mitral L-waves was significantly higher than that in those without mitral L-waves (15 [46.9%] vs. 16 [14.0%], p < .001). A multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the mitral L-waves were a significant predictive factor of LRAFs (hazard ratio: 3.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.53-6.24, p = .002).

CONCLUSION

The appearance of mitral L-waves could predict LRAFs after CA.

Role of empirical isolation of the superior vena cava in patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation-a multi-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers play a role in the initiation of atrial fibrillation (AF), with the superior vena cava (SVC) being a common location. The aim of the current study was to investigate a strategy of empirical SVC isolation (SVCI) in addition to re-isolation of PV in patients with recurrence of AF after index PV isolation (PVI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients from two centers with recurrence of AF after index PVI, undergoing a repeat ablation. Whereas only a re-isolation of the PV was intended in patients with reconnections of equal or more than two PV (PVI group), an additional SVCI was aimed for in patients with < 2 isolated PV in addition to the re-isolation of the PV (PVI + group). Analysis was performed as-treated and per-protocol.

RESULTS

Of the 344 patients included in the study (age 60 ± 10 years, 73% male, 66% paroxysmal AF), PVI only was performed in 269 patients (77%) and PVI plus SVCI (PVI +) in 75 patients (23%). Overall, freedom from AF/AT after repeat PVI was 80% (196 patients) in the PVI group and 73% in the PVI + group (p = 0.151). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, presence of persistent AF (HR 2.067 (95% CI 1.389-3.078), p < 0.001) and hypertension (HR 1.905 (95% CI 1.218-2.980), p = 0.005) were identified as only significant predictors of AF/AT recurrence. The per-protocol results did not differ from this observation.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of an empirical additional SVCI at repeat PVI ablation for recurrence of AF/AT does not improve outcome compared to a PVI only approach.

Empirical superior vena cava isolation improves outcomes of radiofrequency re-ablation in pulmonary vein isolation non-responders: A 2-center retrospective study in China

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the standard ablation strategy for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal strategy of a repeat procedure for PVI non-responders remains unclear.

Objective

This study aims to investigate the incidence of PVI non-responders in patients undergoing a repeat procedure, as well as the predictors for the recurrence of repeat ablation.

Methods

A total of 276 consecutive patients who underwent repeat ablation from August 2016 to July 2019 in two centers were screened. A total of 64 (22%) patients with durable PVI were enrolled. Techniques such as low voltage zone modification, linear ablation, non-PV trigger ablation, and empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation were conducted.

Results

After the 20.0 ± 9.9 month follow-up, 42 (65.6%) patients were free from atrial arrhythmias. A significant difference was reported between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups in non-paroxysmal AF (50 vs. 23.8%, p = 0.038), diabetes mellitus (27.3 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.02), and empirical superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (28.6 vs. 60.5%, p = 0.019). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that empirical SVC isolation was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrence (95% CI: 1.64-32.8, p = 0.009). Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrates significant difference in recurrence between empirical and non-empirical SVC isolation groups (HR: 0.338; 95% CI: 0.131-0.873; p = 0.025).

Conclusion

About 22% of patients in repeat procedures were PVI non-responders. Non-paroxysmal AF and diabetes mellitus were associated with recurrence post-re-ablation. Empirical SVC isolation could potentially improve the outcome of repeat procedures in PVI non-responders.

Epicardial adipose tissue around the superior vena cava: A single center study of factors related to atrial fibrillation

The superior vena cava (SVC) is the main component of non-pulmonary vein (PV) ectopy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Researchers have found that epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume is related to the AF substrate, which can be defined by the low voltage area (LVA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SVC-EAT and SVC-AF. Twenty-six patients with SVC-AF triggers were identified as the SVC-AF group. Other three groups were defined and included as the LVA-AF group (LVA>5%), non-LVA-AF group (LVA<5%), and physical examination (PE) group. EAT around left atrium (LA-EAT) and SVC-EAT volumes were obtained using a cardiac risk assessment module. According to the SVC/LA-EAT ratio, there are significant differences between the SVC-AF group and the three control groups (the SVC-AF group 0.092±0.041 vs. the LVA-AF group 0.054±0.026, the non-LVA-AF group 0.052±0.022, and the PE group 0.052±0.019, all P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggests the optimal cut-off point of SVC/LA-EAT ratio is 6.8% for detecting SVC-AF patients, with 81.1% sensitivity, 73.1% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.91). Those with SVC-AF have a higher SVC/LA-EAT ratio and empirical SVC isolation could be considered if the SVC/LA-EAT ratio was over 6.8%.

Effect of isolation feasibility of non-pulmonary vein foci on efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison of the isolation and focal ablation methods

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) mainly originates from the pulmonary vein (PV). However, some AF triggers originate from other sites, namely non-PV foci, which are related to recurrence after AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of isolation feasibility (isolability) of non-PV foci on the efficacy of AF ablation.

METHODS

Overall, 1855 patients with AF (age, 64.6 ± 10.9 years; 82% paroxysmal) underwent PV isolation, followed by induction and ablation of non-PV foci. Among them, 545 (29%) patients had non-PV foci; these patients were categorized into those with isolable non-PV foci (n = 196, 36%) and those with non-isolable non-PV foci (n = 349, 64%).

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 15.6 months, recurrence was higher in the non-isolable group than in the isolable group (34% vs. 19%, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significantly better 1-year clinical outcome in the isolable group than in the non-isolable group (88.0% vs. 78.4%, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.81). This outcome was not inferior to that of patients without non-PV foci (88.3% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.81). The non-isolable group showed poorer clinical outcomes than patients without non-PV foci (78.4% vs. 90.8%, P < 0.001; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.53). Cox regression analysis revealed that isolability (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89) and unmappability (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.55-5.37) of non-PV foci were significant predictors of arrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The isolability of non-PV foci was a significant factor affecting the achievement of better clinical outcomes following AF ablation in patients with non-PV foci.

The Dissimilar Impact in Atrial Substrate Modificationof Left and Right Pulmonary Veins Isolation after Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Since the discovery of pulmonary veins (PVs) as foci of atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest cardiac arrhythmia, investigation revolves around PVs catheter ablation (CA) results. Notwithstanding, CA process itself is rather neglected. We aim to decompose crucial CA steps: coronary sinus (CS) catheterization and the impact of left and right PVs isolation (LPVI, RPVI), separately. We recruited 40 paroxysmal AF patients undergoing first-time CA and obtained five-minute lead II and bipolar CS recordings during sinus rhythm (SR) before CA (B), after LPVI (L) and after RPVI (R). Among others, duration, amplitude and atrial-rate variability (ARV) were calculated for P-waves and CS local activation waves (LAWs). LAWs features were compared among CS channels for reliability analysis. P-waves and LAWs features were compared after each ablation step (B, L, R). CS channels: amplitude and area were different between distal/medial (p≤0.0014) and distal/mid-proximal channels (p≤0.0025). Medial and distal showed the most and least coherent values, respectively. Correlation was higher in proximal (≥93%) than distal (≤91%) areas. P-waves: duration was significantly shortened after LPVI (after L: p=0.0012, −13.30%). LAWs: insignificant variations. ARV modification was more prominent in LAWs (L: >+73.12%, p≤0.0480, R: <−33.94%, p≤0.0642). Medial/mid-proximal channels are recommended during SR. CS LAWs are not significantly affected by CA but they describe more precisely CA-induced ARV modifications. LPVI provokes the highest impact in paroxysmal AF CA, significantly modifying P-wave duration.

Sex Differences in the Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone vs. Extensive Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Women experience more severe arrhythmogenic substrates. This study hypothesized that an extensive ablation strategy, such as linear ablation and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI-plus), might be effective for women, whereas the PVI alone strategy (PVI-alone) might be sufficient for men to maintain sinus rhythm. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis.Methods and Results:This study is a post-hoc subanalysis of the EARNEST-PVI trial focusing on sex differences in the efficacies of different ablation strategies. The EARNEST-PVI trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and open-label non-inferiority trial in patients with persistent AF. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. The EARNEST-PVI trial randomized 376 (76%) men (PVI-alone 186, PVI-plus 190) and 121 (24%) women (PVI-alone 63, PVI-plus 58). The event rate was significantly lower for men and numerically lower for women in the PVI-plus than the PVI-alone group, and there was no interaction between men and women (hazard ratio, 0.641; 95% confidence interval, 0.417-0.985; P value, 0.043 for men vs. hazard ratio, 0.661; 95% confidence interval, 0.352-1.240; P value, 0.197 for women; P value for interaction, 0.989).

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of the extensive ablation strategy vs. the PVI-alone strategy for persistent AF was consistent across both sexes.

Impact of the sinus node recovery time after termination of atrial fibrillation during catheter ablation on clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

Although long sinus arrest is occasionally observed during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation when the fibrillation was terminated, its meaning and prognosis have not yet been clearly elucidated. We hypothesized that sinus node recovery time (SNRT) after termination of AF (time from termination of AF to the earliest sinus node activation) could reflect the extent of atrial remodeling, influencing the formation of non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers and post-ablation outcomes.

Method

The participants were 157 consecutive patients with persistent AF (male: 77.1%, age: 63.3±11.2 years) who underwent catheter ablation. We recorded SNRT after terminating AF by radiofrequency delivery or electrical cardioversion during the first ablation and evaluated the relationships between SNRT and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and between SNRT and non-PV triggers after repeat ablation.

Results

Forty-five patients (28.7%) experienced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Patients with recurrence had longer SNRTs (1738 ms vs. 1394 ms, p = 0.012). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only SNRT ≥2128ms was a significant independent predictor of clinical AF recurrence (hazard ratio 7.48; 95% confidence interval 2.94–19.00; P<0.001). Kaplan–Meier estimator showed that the recurrence-free rate was significantly lower if ≥ 2128ms (log-rank, p<0.001). Thirty-five patients (77.8%) underwent a second ablation. Although there was no difference in the rate of pulmonary vein reconnections (78.6% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.712), non-PV triggers were observed more frequently in the longer SNRT group (57.1% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Patients with a prolonged SNRT had a higher prevalence of AF recurrence after the first ablation and higher inducibility of non-PV triggers. Measuring SNRT might be used for the stratification of patients with persistent AF.