Effect of isolation feasibility of non-pulmonary vein foci on efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison of the isolation and focal ablation methods

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) mainly originates from the pulmonary vein (PV). However, some AF triggers originate from other sites, namely non-PV foci, which are related to recurrence after AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of isolation feasibility (isolability) of non-PV foci on the efficacy of AF ablation.

METHODS

Overall, 1855 patients with AF (age, 64.6 ± 10.9 years; 82% paroxysmal) underwent PV isolation, followed by induction and ablation of non-PV foci. Among them, 545 (29%) patients had non-PV foci; these patients were categorized into those with isolable non-PV foci (n = 196, 36%) and those with non-isolable non-PV foci (n = 349, 64%).

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 15.6 months, recurrence was higher in the non-isolable group than in the isolable group (34% vs. 19%, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significantly better 1-year clinical outcome in the isolable group than in the non-isolable group (88.0% vs. 78.4%, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.81). This outcome was not inferior to that of patients without non-PV foci (88.3% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.81). The non-isolable group showed poorer clinical outcomes than patients without non-PV foci (78.4% vs. 90.8%, P < 0.001; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.53). Cox regression analysis revealed that isolability (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89) and unmappability (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.55-5.37) of non-PV foci were significant predictors of arrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The isolability of non-PV foci was a significant factor affecting the achievement of better clinical outcomes following AF ablation in patients with non-PV foci.