1
|
Scaglioni G, Capasso M, Bianchi M, Caso D, Cavazza N. Facing the Emotional Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening. The Roles of Reappraisal and Situation Selection. Int J Behav Med 2024:10.1007/s12529-024-10284-4. [PMID: 38637471 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-024-10284-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disgust, embarrassment, and fear can hinder the attendance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, individuals can respond to these emotions differently. The present study tested whether reappraising a negative stimulus versus avoiding a negative stimulus is associated with age; whether these two emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal and situation selection) moderate the effects of disgust, embarrassment and fear on CRC screening intention; and the efficacy of a message based on participants' preferred emotion regulation strategy. METHODS We recruited 483 Italian participants (aged 40-84 years) through snowball sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions differing for a message promoting CRC screening with an affective lever, a cognitive lever, both levers or none. Key variables included emotion regulation strategies, emotional barriers and intention to get screened. RESULTS The preference for reappraisal over situation selection increased with age. Reappraisal neutralized the effect of disgust on CRC screening intention. The combined message with both affective and cognitive levers increased CRC screening intention (b = 0.27, β = 0.11, SE = 0.13 p = .049), whereas reading the message based only on the affective (b = 0.16, β = 0.06, SE = 0.14 p = .258) or the cognitive (b = 0.22, β = 0.09, SE = 0.14 p = .107) lever was not effective. CONCLUSIONS Communication campaigns should support the activation of a reappraisal strategy of emotion control, and messages promoting CRC screening should highlight both the instrumental (i.e., early detection) and affective (i.e., peace of mind) benefits of attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Scaglioni
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Miriam Capasso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcella Bianchi
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Caso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Cavazza
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
González Leone MF, Donizzetti AR, Bianchi M, Lemmo D, Martino ML, Freda MF, Caso D. Users' Experience of Public Cancer Screening Services: Qualitative Research Findings and Implications for Public Health System. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:139. [PMID: 38392492 PMCID: PMC10885925 DOI: 10.3390/bs14020139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Following the One Health approach, designing multidimensional strategies to orient healthcare in promoting health and preventive processes has become paramount. In particular, in the prevention domain, cancer screening attendance is still unsatisfactory in many populations and requires specific consideration. To this end, following a research-intervention logic, this study aims to investigate the experiences and meanings that users of public cancer screening services associate with prevention, particularly participation in the screenings. The experiences of 103 users (96 females; Mage = 54.0; SD = 1.24) of public cancer screening programs in the Campania region (Italy) were collected through interviews. The data collected were analysed following the Grounded Theory Methodology, supported by the software Atlas.ti 8.0. The text material was organised into eight macro-categories: Health and Body; Relationship with Cancer and Diseases; Health Facilities and Health Providers; The Affective Determinants of Cancer Screening Participation; Partners and Children; Physical Sensations and Emotions in the Course of Action; Protective Actions; Promotion and Dissemination. The core category was named Family and Familiarity. Respondents perceived prevention as an act of care for the family and themselves. Our findings support a shift from the idea of taking care of personal health as an individual matter toward considering it as a community issue, according to which resistance to act is overcome for and through the presence of loved ones. The results of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the perspectives of southern Italian users on participation in cancer screening, and provide important insights to guide future actions to promote these public programmes based primarily on the emerging theme of family and familiarity related to screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marcella Bianchi
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Lemmo
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Martino
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Daniela Caso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guigon L, Sánchez LXG, Petit AS, Bonniec AL, Basu P, Rodrigue CM, Préau M, Soler-Michel P, Villain P. Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:404. [PMID: 38326802 PMCID: PMC10851553 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To inform the development of an online tool to be potentially used in shared decision-making about breast cancer screening, French women were questioned about participation in breast cancer screening, the health professional's role, and their perceptions of the proposed tool. METHODS We organised focus group discussions with 55 French women. Two different strategies were used to recruit women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. We applied both inductive and deductive approaches to conduct a thematic analysis of the discussions. We analysed the responses by using the main determinants from different health behaviour models and compared the two groups. RESULTS Independently of socioeconomic status, the most important determinant for a woman's participation in breast cancer screening was the perceived severity of breast cancer and the perceived benefits of its early detection by screening. Cues to action reported by both groups were invitation letters; recommendations by health professionals, or group/community activities and public events were reported by women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds, respectively. Among other positive determinants, women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported making informed decisions and receiving peer support whereas women from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported community empowerment through group/community events. Fear of cancer was reported as a barrier in both groups. Among other barriers, language issues were reported only by women from low socioeconomic backgrounds; women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported breast cancer screening-related risks other than overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment. Barriers to accessing the online tool to be developed were mainly reported by women from high socioeconomic backgrounds. CONCLUSION Limitations in implementing shared decision-making for women from low socioeconomic backgrounds were highlighted. An online tool that is suitable for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status, would provide "on-demand" reliable and tailored information about breast cancer screening and improve access to health professionals and social exchanges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureline Guigon
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Laura X Gil Sánchez
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Petit
- Unité Inserm, Université Lumière Lyon, 1296 « Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement », Lyon, France
| | - Alice Le Bonniec
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Christelle M Rodrigue
- Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers (CRCDC) Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Site Rhône & Métropole de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marie Préau
- Unité Inserm, Université Lumière Lyon, 1296 « Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement », Lyon, France
| | - Patricia Soler-Michel
- Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers (CRCDC) Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Site Rhône & Métropole de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Patricia Villain
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martino ML, Lemmo D, Donizzetti AR, Bianchi M, Freda MF, Caso D. Emotions and Narrative Reappraisal Strategies of Users of Breast Cancer Screening: Reconstructing the Past, Passing Through the Present, and Predicting Emotions. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2024; 34:263-276. [PMID: 38128547 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231214120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Emotional forecasting, meaning how a person anticipates feeling as a consequence of their choices, drives healthcare decision-making. Research, however, suggests that people often do not fully anticipate or otherwise grasp the future emotional impacts of their decisions. Emotional reappraisal strategies, such as putting emotions into words and sharing emotions with others, may mitigate potential undesirable effects of emotions on decision-making. The use of such strategies is important for consequential decisions, such as obtaining timely mammography screening for breast cancer, whereby earlier diagnosis may impact the success of treatment. In this study, we explored the use of emotional reappraisal strategies for decision-making regarding breast cancer screening attendance among women aged 50-69 years. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews following mammography with a reflexive thematic methodological approach employed for analysis. Results shed light on how participants' emotional response narratives were reconstructed before the mammography, felt during the mammography, and forecasted while awaiting the results. Future research should consider how individuals experience and manage their emotions as they access breast screening services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Lemmo
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marcella Bianchi
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Daniela Caso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Ani A, Hammouri M, Sultan H, Al-Huneidy L, Mansour A, Al-Hussaini M. Factors affecting cervical screening using the health belief model during the last decade: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6275. [PMID: 38282232 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the utility of the health belief model (HBM) and other socioeconomic factors in shaping cervical screening behaviors. Also, to provide recommendations on improving screening uptake. METHODOLOGY A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane/CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for articles reporting on the factors associated with cervical screening using the HBM within the period from January of 2002 to January of 2023. Effect sizes for the various HBM constructs were pre-determined using the log odds ratio (logOR) and expressed with their confidence intervals. All reporting was in line with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included in the final analysis comprised of 15,365 participants. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that perceived susceptibility (OR: 1.40, 95% CI, 1.03-1.89), perceived benefits (OR: 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.50), and self-efficacy (OR: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17) were significantly associated with both the uptake of and intention to adopt preventive measures against cervical cancer. Conversely, women with higher perceptions of barriers were less likely to adopt any measure for cervical cancer screening or prevention (OR: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91). In terms of sociodemographic effectors, older age (OR: 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19), graduate/post-graduate education (OR: 2.80; 95% CI, 1.46-5.37), higher knowledge of cervical cancer (OR: 2.21; 95% CI, 1.27-3.84), and being married (OR: 3.89; 95% CI, 1.38-10.92) were all associated with altering preventive behaviors and intentions toward cervical cancer. CONCLUSION This review delineates the most important and effective cognitive components that should be targeted within interventions aiming to promote cervical cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah Al-Ani
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Hala Sultan
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Asem Mansour
- Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Maysa Al-Hussaini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharma M, Johansen C, Batra K, Dai CL, Batra R, Hayes T, Singh A. Using the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change to Explain the Seeking of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6553. [PMID: 37623139 PMCID: PMC10454677 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20166553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer-associated deaths. While colorectal cancer is on the decline in the United States (US), disparities still exist, despite the non-invasive screening modalities, such as stool-based tests have shown themselves to be effective in the detection of colorectal cancer. Many of the existing stool-based test interventions lack the use of a contemporary theory-based approach. Given the paucity of theory-based interventions intended to promote stool-based tests, this cross-sectional study utilizes the multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change to explain the seeking of stool-based tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. An online 57-item questionnaire with an established psychometric validity was used to collect responses from the US-based sample (n = 640) of adults aged 45-75 years old. The data were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate statistical methods. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to test the construct validity of the survey instrument. In this nationwide sample, 39.2% (n = 251) of participants reported having received some form of a stool-based test. Among the participants who did not undergo stool-based CRC screening, the MTM subscales, including "participatory dialogue", "behavioral confidence", and "changes in the social environment", were significant predictors of initiating screening behavior and explained 48% of the variance in the initiation among this group (R2 = 0.579, F = 5.916, p < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.481). The MTM may be a useful framework with which to design educational, mass media, social media, and clinical interventions for the promotion of stool-based CRC screening among adults aged 45-75 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Sharma
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA;
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA;
| | - Christopher Johansen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA;
| | - Kavita Batra
- Office of Research, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA
- Department of Medical Education, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA
| | - Chia-Liang Dai
- Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA;
| | - Ravi Batra
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA;
| | - Traci Hayes
- Department of Public Health, School of Health Professions, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA;
| | - Aditi Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89102, USA;
| |
Collapse
|