Diabetic foot infections: what have we learned in the last 30 years?

Postbiotic lactobacilli induce cutaneous antimicrobial response and restore the barrier to inhibit the intracellular invasion of Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and ex vivo

Intracellular pathogens including Staphylococcus aureus contribute to the non-healing phenotype of chronic wounds. Lactobacilli, well known as beneficial bacteria, are also reported to modulate the immune system, yet their role in cutaneous immunity remains largely unknown. We explored the therapeutic potential of bacteria-free postbiotics, bioactive lysates of lactobacilli, to reduce intracellular S. aureus colonization and promote healing. Fourteen postbiotics derived from various lactobacilli species were screened, and Latilactobacillus curvatus BGMK2-41 was selected for further analysis based on the most efficient ability to reduce intracellular infection by S. aureus diabetic foot ulcer clinical isolate and S. aureus USA300. Treatment of both infected keratinocytes in vitro and infected human skin ex vivo with BGMK2-41 postbiotic cleared S. aureus. Keratinocytes treated in vitro with BGMK2-41 upregulated expression of antimicrobial response genes, of which DEFB4, ANG, and RNASE7 were also found upregulated in treated ex vivo human skin together with CAMP exclusively upregulated ex vivo. Furthermore, BGMK2-41 postbiotic treatment has a multifaceted impact on the wound healing process. Treatment of keratinocytes stimulated cell migration and the expression of tight junction proteins, while in ex vivo human skin BGMK2-41 increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, promoted re-epithelialization, and restored the epidermal barrier via upregulation of tight junction proteins. Together, this provides a potential therapeutic approach for persistent intracellular S. aureus infections.

What is the agreement between principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infection: an in-hospital quality control study

Introduction: Standardization of diagnostic and treatment concepts in diabetes-related foot infection (DFI) is challenging. In 2019, specific recommendations regarding diagnostic principles and antibiotic therapy (ABT) for DFI, including the one for osteomyelitis (DFO), were introduced in our institution. In this study, we assessed the adherence to these in-house guidelines 2 years after their implementation. Methods: Adult patients with DFI with and without DFO who underwent surgical intervention between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed. Accordance to recommendations regarding biopsy sampling, labeling, requesting microbiological and histopathological examinations, and treatment duration were assessed. Results: A total of 80 patients with 117 hospital episodes and 163 surgical interventions were included; 84.6 % required an amputation. Patients with HbA1c levels of < 6.5  % more often required a revision during the same hospitalization than those with HbA1c levels of ≥ 6.5  % (29.4 % vs. 12.1 %, respectively, p = 0.023 ). Specimens were obtained in 71.8 % of operations and sent for histological examination in 63.2 %. The mean duration of ABT was 9 (interquartile range (IQR) 5-15) d in macroscopically surgically cured episodes and 40.5 (IQR 15-42) d in cases with resection margins in non-healthy bone ( p < 0.0001 ). Treatment duration results were similar when using histological results: 13 (IQR 8-42) d for healthy bone vs. 29 (IQR 13-42) d for resection margins consistent with osteomyelitis ( p = 0.026 ). Conclusion: The adherence to recommendations in terms of biopsy sampling was good, moderate for histopathological analysis and poor for labeling the anatomic location. Adherence to recommendations for ABT duration was good, but further shortening of treatment duration for surgically cured cases is necessary.

Diabetic Foot Infections in the Emergency Department

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is among the most common diabetic complications requiring hospitalization. Prompt emergency department diagnosis and evidence-based management can prevent eventual amputation and associated disability and mortality. Underlying neuropathy, arterial occlusion, immune dysfunction, and hyperglycemia-associated dehydration and ketoacidosis can all contribute to severity and conspire to make DFI diagnosis and management difficult. Serious complications include osteomyelitis, necrotizing infection, and sepsis. Practice guidelines are designed to assist frontline providers with correct diagnosis, categorization, and treatment decisions. Management generally includes a careful lower extremity examination and plain x-ray, obtaining appropriate tissue cultures, and evidence-based antibiotic selection tailored to severity.

Clinical practice recommendations for infectious disease management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) - 2023 SPILF

In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.

Treatment challenges in the management of difficult-to-treat gram-positive infections: A consensus view apropos therapeutic role of novel anti-MRSA antibiotics, levonadifloxacin (IV) and alalevonadifloxacin (oral)

PURPOSE

Treatment of antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive infections (GPIs), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is becoming increasingly difficult, particularly in patients with multiple co-morbidities who require antibiotics with greater safety and a consistent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile. Such difficult-to-treat GPIs are often associated with poor outcomes, extended hospital stay and increased expenditure. This can be partly attributed to the limited safety and aberrant PK/PD profile of existing anti-MRSA antibiotics. In this context, intravenous levonadifloxacin and its oral prodrug alalevonadifloxacin are novel anti-MRSA antibiotics that have significant advantages over conventional anti-Gram-positive antibiotics. The purpose of this paper was to generate a consensus on the optimal use of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin for tackling resistant Gram-positive infections in patients with multiple co-morbidities.

METHOD

Using a modified Delphi approach that combines critical appraisal of evidence and expert opinion, therapeutic use of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin in various clinical scenarios and specific unmet conditions was deliberated. Fifteen expert members from medicine, critical-care, emergency, microbiology, and intensive-care disciplines participated and voted on 11 pre-conceived statements. When there was at least 70 % agreement, a consensus was reached.

RESULTS

Following the voting, agreements were reached on 10 out of the 11 statements. Broadly, a consensus was reached in defining the therapeutic role of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin in the treatment of various clinical indications involving resistant Gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA, in patients with co-morbidities, such as co-existing or increased risk for kidney dysfunction or hepatic disease and/or immunosuppression; also, in therapeutically challenging conditions caused by Gram-positive bacteria such as bacteraemia, bone and joint infection, diabetic foot infection, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus supports the therapeutic use of levonadifloxacin and alalevonadifloxacin in the treatment of antibiotic-resistant GPIs, including those caused by MRSA and certain polymicrobial infections, in patients with multiple co-morbidities requiring drug with adequate safety and consistent efficacy.

A Review of the Clinical Utilization of Oral Antibacterial Therapy in the Treatment of Bone Infections in Adults

Chronic osteomyelitis in adults is managed with prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics in conjunction with surgical debridement of necrotic bone. Over the past 40 years, there has been no paradigm shift in this approach, as randomized controlled trials of this standard of care compared to alternatives such as prolonged oral antibiotics are scarce. However, there have been many small trials, case reports, and review papers evaluating the effectiveness of oral treatment for chronic osteomyelitis. The oral route for infections requiring prolonged treatment is intuitively and practically more favorable due to several advantages, the most important of which is the avoidance of long-term IV antimicrobial therapy with its complications, inconvenience, and cost. In this paper, we review the literature evaluating oral antibiotic therapy in the management of chronic bone infections since 1975. The majority of osteomyelitis infections are caused by Staphylococcus aureus, hence we focus on its treatment using oral antibiotics; however, we also emphasize subpopulations of patients with diabetes, implanted hardware, and with less common bacterial organisms. The primary objective of this review is to promulgate clinical recommendations on the use of oral antibiotics in bone infections in the context of initial therapy, transition from intravenous therapy, and the role of chronic suppression. The secondary objective is to summarize current knowledge of the specific oral antimicrobial agents that are commonly utilized, together with a synopsis of the available literature pertaining to their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and duration of therapy in bone infection.

Definition of thermal indicators for the study of thermoregulation alterations in the foot of people living within diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A proof of concept

AIMS

This study investigates how diabetic peripheral neuropathy is linked to impairment of thermoregulatory mechanisms using a thermal camera, spectral thermal analysis and a physical test.

METHODS

The plantar skin temperature of all participants was measured using a thermal camera following a 6-min walking exercise. The data were subjected to frequency decomposition, resulting in two frequency ranges corresponding to endothelial and neurogenic mechanisms. Then, 40 thermal indicators were evaluated for each participant. ROC curve and statistical tests allowed to identify indicators able to detect the presence or absence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

RESULTS

The study included 33 participants living with diabetes. The results revealed that a 6-min walk exercise increased plantar foot temperature and highlighted a significant difference between people living with diabetes with and without peripheral neuropathy (p < 0.01). The results also revealed the advantages of using thermal images rather than single point measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is linked to impairment of thermoregulatory mechanisms. This link can be highlighted after a dedicated 6-min walk exercise, enabling to activate these mechanisms, and measuring with a thermal camera the temporal plantar skin temperature. Assessment of this link gave best results by filtering the thermal signal in the neurogenic range.

Comparative Efficacy of Conservative Surgery vs Minor Amputation for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical intervention for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Conservative surgery-amputation-free resection of infected bone and soft tissues-is gaining traction as an alternative to minor amputation. Our primary objective was to explore the comparative effectiveness of conservative surgery and minor amputations in clinical failure risk 1 year after index intervention. We also aimed to explore microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year study period.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center chart review of DFO patients undergoing either conservative surgery or minor amputation. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to explore the effect of surgical intervention on clinical failure (recurrent diabetic foot infection at surgical site within 1 year after index operation), microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

651 patients were included (conservative surgery, n = 121; minor amputation, n = 530). Clinical failure occurred in 34 (28%) patients in the conservative surgery group, and in 111 (21%) of the minor amputation group at 1 year (P = .09). After controlling for potential confounders, we found no association between conservative surgery and clinical failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). We found no between-group differences in microbiological recurrence at 1 year (conservative surgery: 8 [6.6%]; minor amputation: 33 [6.2%]; P = .25; adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.6). Over the 10-year period, the conservative group underwent significantly more revision surgeries (conservative surgery: 85 [70.2%]; minor amputation: 252 [47.5%]; P < .01; adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8).

CONCLUSION

We found that with comorbidity-based patient selection, conservative surgery in the treatment of DFO was associated with the same rates of clinical failure and microbiological recurrence at 1 year, but with significantly more revision surgeries during follow-up, compared with minor amputations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative effectiveness study.

Safety and tolerability of tedizolid as oral treatment for bone and joint infections

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are common infections increasingly managed with oral therapy. However, there are limited safe oral options for many Gram-positive pathogens. In animal studies and short-term human use, tedizolid lacks the hematologic and neurologic toxicity of the other available oxazolidinone, linezolid. However, there are limited prospective safety data. We conducted an open-label, non-comparative trial of oral tedizolid for BJI treatment. Primary outcomes were safety and cure rate. Eligible patients had a BJI caused by documented or suspected Gram-positive pathogen, required 4-12 weeks of therapy, and did not have myelosuppression or peripheral/optic neuropathy. Subjects underwent weekly evaluation for cytopenias and neuropathy. We enrolled 44 subjects; five were lost to follow-up. Two subjects did not complete planned treatment because of rash (n = 1) and urgent surgery (n = 1). Of 37 patients with evaluable outcomes, 17 (46%) had hardware-associated infection, 13 (35%) had osteomyelitis, 5 (14%) had prosthetic joint infection, and 2 (5%) had other BJIs. Median (mean, range) treatment duration was 12 (10.1, 4-12) weeks. There were no cases of cytopenias or peripheral or optic neuropathy. Treatment cure occurred in 13 (35%); 19 (51%) required antibiotic continuation after 12 weeks of tedizolid related to retained hardware at the BJI site, and failure occurred in four (11%), two unlikely, one possibly, and one probably due to tedizolid. We found that oral tedizolid was well tolerated for prolonged BJI treatment without significant toxicity. Clinical failure rate was similar to that of other published BJI investigations. (This study has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT03009045.) IMPORTANCE Bone and joint infections are common infections with limited effective and safe oral options for Gram-positive infections. The largest prospective clinical trial of tedizolid therapy for bone and joint infections enrolled 44 patients and tested each in person weekly with detailed safety monitoring including tests for leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and optic neuropathy for up to 12 weeks. Findings demonstrated tedizolid was generally well tolerated and there were no incident cases of cytopenias or neuropathy. Cure rates were similar to that in other bone and joint infection studies. In summary, oral tedizolid appears to be a well-tolerated oral option for Gram-positive bone and joint infections.

Metagenomic analysis reveals antibiotic resistance profiles in tissue samples from patients with diabetic foot infections

OBJECTIVES

Treating patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) is challenging because of high rates of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, to administer a suitable antibiotic treatment, it is necessary to know the antibiotic resistance patterns in DFIs.

METHODS

To explore this question, we selected metagenomic data of 36 tissue samples from patients with DFI in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive database.

RESULTS

A total of 229 antibiotic-resistant gene (ARG) subtypes belonging to 20 ARG types were detected. The antibiotic resistome of 229 different genes in the tissue samples of patients with DFI comprised 24 core and 205 accessory resistance genes. Among the core antibiotic resistome, multidrug, tetracycline, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin, and beta-lactam resistance genes were the dominant categories. Procrustes analysis indicated that both the microbial community composition and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) were determinants of the ARGs. In the network analysis, 29 species were speculated to be potential hosts of 28 ARGs based on the co-occurrence results. Plasmids and transposons were the most common elements that co-occurred with ARGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided detailed information about antibiotic resistance patterns in DFI, which has practical implications for suggesting a more specific antibiotic choice.

The bacteriology of diabetic foot ulcers and infections and incidence of Staphylococcus aureus Small Colony Variants

Introduction. Uninfected diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) progression to diabetes-related foot infection (DFI) is a prevalent complication for patients with diabetes. DFI often progresses to osteomyelitis (DFI-OM). Active (growing) Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen in these infections. There is relapse in 40-60 % of cases even when the initial treatment at the DFI stage apparently clears infection.Hypothesis. S. aureus adopts the quasi-dormant Small Colony Variant (SCV) state during DFU and consequently infection, and when present in DFI cases also permits survival in non-diseased tissues as a reservoir to cause relapse.Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial factors that facilitate persistent infections.Methodology. People with diabetes were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. Clinical and bacterial data was taken from 153 patients with diabetes (51 from a control group with no ulcer or infection) and samples taken from 102 patients with foot complications to identify bacterial species and their variant colony types, and then compare the bacterial composition in those with uninfected DFU, DFI and those with DFI-OM, of whom samples were taken both from wounds (DFI-OM/W) and bone (DFI-OM/B). Intracellular, extracellular and proximal 'healthy' bone were examined.Results. S. aureus was identified as the most prevalent pathogen in diabetes-related foot pathologies (25 % of all samples). For patients where disease progressed from DFU to DFI-OM, S. aureus was isolated as a diversity of colony types, with increasing numbers of SCVs present. Intracellular (bone) SCVs were found, and even within uninfected bone SCVs were present. Wounds of 24 % of patients with uninfected DFU contained active S. aureus. All patients with a DFI with a wound but not bone infection had previously had S. aureus isolated from an infection (including amputation), representing a relapse.Conclusion. The presence of S. aureus SCVs in recalcitrant pathologies highlights their importance in persistent infections through the colonization of reservoirs, such as bone. The survival of these cells in intracellular bone is an important clinical finding supporting in vitro data. Also, there seems to be a link between the genetics of S. aureus found in deeper infections compared to those only found in DFU.

Timing of Revascularization and Parenteral Antibiotic Treatment Associated with Therapeutic Failures in Ischemic Diabetic Foot Infections

For ischemic diabetic foot infections (DFIs), revascularization ideally occurs before surgery, while a parenteral antibiotic treatment could be more efficacious than oral agents. In our tertiary center, we investigated the effects of the sequence between revascularization and surgery (emphasizing the perioperative period of 2 weeks before and after surgery), and the influence of administering parenteral antibiotic therapy on the outcomes of DFIs. Among 838 ischemic DFIs with moderate-to-severe symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, we revascularized 608 (72%; 562 angioplasties, 62 vascular surgeries) and surgically debrided all. The median length of postsurgical antibiotic therapy was 21 days (given parenterally for the initial 7 days). The median time delay between revascularization and debridement surgery was 7 days. During the long-term follow-up, treatment failed and required reoperation in 182 DFI episodes (30%). By multivariate Cox regression analyses, neither a delay between surgery and angioplasty (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.0), nor the postsurgical sequence of angioplasty (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.8), nor long-duration parenteral antibiotic therapy (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1) prevented failures. Our results might indicate the feasibility of a more practical approach to ischemic DFIs in terms of timing of vascularization and more oral antibiotic use.

Improving the Management and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infection: Challenges and Research Opportunities

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) management requires complex multidisciplinary care pathways with off-loading, debridement and targeted antibiotic treatment central to positive clinical outcomes. Local administration of topical treatments and advanced wound dressings are often used for more superficial infections, and in combination with systemic antibiotics for more advanced infections. In practice, the choice of such topical approaches, whether alone or as adjuncts, is rarely evidence-based, and there does not appear to be a single market leader. There are several reasons for this, including a lack of clear evidence-based guidelines on their efficacy and a paucity of robust clinical trials. Nonetheless, with a growing number of people living with diabetes, preventing the progression of chronic foot infections to amputation is critical. Topical agents may increasingly play a role, especially as they have potential to limit the use of systemic antibiotics in an environment of increasing antibiotic resistance. While a number of advanced dressings are currently marketed for DFI, here we review the literature describing promising future-focused approaches for topical treatment of DFI that may overcome some of the current hurdles. Specifically, we focus on antibiotic-impregnated biomaterials, novel antimicrobial peptides and photodynamic therapy.

Microbiota of diabetic foot infections in a University Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia

The presence of infection in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is one of the main causes of lower limb amputation in the world. The presence of polymicrobial infections is usually the standard for isolation in such lesions, with Gram Positive (GP) germs being the main organisms involved, as is described in the global literature. However, some studies indicate a greater number of isolates with Gram Negative (GN) germs, reported mainly in the literature of Middle Eastern countries and in the tropics.

Changing Bacterial Etiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles as Prognostic Determinants of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Ten-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: In this single-center study, we analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) between 2011 and 2020. Patients and Methods: The first and second five-year periods were compared. A poor prognosis was defined as a primary composite end point including re-infection, major amputation, or mortality at six months. Results: A total of 484 patients were enrolled. Overall, 269 patients had the primary composite end point. A substantial decrease was detected in the second five-year period in terms of re-infection (n = 132, 66.0% vs. n = 68, 23.9%; p < 0.001) and mortality (n = 22, 11.0% vs. n = 7, 2.5%; p < 0.001). A total of 798 micro-organisms were isolated from 484 patients. A substantial increase was detected in polymicrobial infections (48.5% vs. 65.1%; p = 0.001) as well as Streptococcus spp. (2.5% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.003), Corynebacterium spp. (9.5% vs. 22.9%; p < 0.001), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli (3.0% vs. 12.7%; p < 0.001) in the second five-year period, whereas the prevalence of multi-drug-resistanct (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.0% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.029) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (7.5% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.017) decreased. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (odds ratio [OR], 1.917; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.074-3.420; p = 0.028) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (OR, 3.069; 95% CI, 1.114-8.453; p = 0.030) were independent predictors for poor prognosis. Conclusions: This 10-year cohort study provides reassuring information about the changing epidemiology of DFIs and the prognostic determinants in patients with DFIs.

Metatranscriptome sequencing identifies Escherichia are major contributors to pathogenic functions and biofilm formation in diabetes related foot osteomyelitis

Osteomyelitis in the feet of persons with diabetes is clinically challenging and is associated with high rates of amputation. In this study RNA-sequencing was employed to explore microbial metatranscriptomes with a view to understand the relative activity and functions of the pathogen/s responsible for diabetes foot osteomyelitis (DFO). We obtained 25 intraoperative bone specimens from persons with confirmed DFO, observing that Escherichia spp. (7%), Streptomyces spp. (7%), Staphylococcus spp. (6%), Klebsiella spp. (5%) and Proteus spp. (5%) are the most active taxa on average. Data was then subset to examine functions associated with pathogenesis (virulence and toxins), biofilm formation and antimicrobial/multi-drug resistance. Analysis revealed Escherichia spp. are the most active taxa relative to pathogenic functions with K06218 (mRNA interferase relE), K03699 (membrane damaging toxin tlyC) and K03980 (putative peptidoglycan lipid II flippase murJ), K01114 (membrane damaging toxin plc) and K19168 (toxin cptA) being the most prevalent pathogenic associated transcripts. The most abundant transcripts associated with biofilm pathways included components of the biofilm EPS matrix including glycogen synthesis, cellulose synthesis, colonic acid synthesis and flagella synthesis. We further observed enrichment of a key enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of L-rhamnose (K01710 -dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase rfbB, rmlB, rffG) which was present in all but four patients with DFO.

Clinical usefulness of quantifying microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter cohort study

AIMS

To evaluate if microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can help in predicting outcomes.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed in an outpatient setting (September 1, 2017-January 31, 2019) in diabetic patients with DFU.Quantitative cultures from DFU tissue biopsies at a baseline visit were obtained; high and low microbial loads were defined as ≥6logCFU/mL and <6logCFU/mL, respectively. Diagnosis of DFU infection was made and managed according to established guidelines. The outcome was evaluated at 6 month-visit as failure (persistence/new infection/amputation) or cure.

RESULTS

Out of 65 patients, 52 (80%) had long-standing DFUs (≥4 weeks), with high microbial load in 19 (29%).DFU infection (n = 24, 37%) was not associated with high microbial load in all patients but those with shorter DFU duration.Treatment failure occurred in 20/57 (35%) patients; high DFU microbial load was associated with worse outcome (n = 9/20, 45% failure rate, adjusted OR4.69; 95% CI, 1.22-18.09; p = 0.03),mainly due to the subgroup of patients with high microbial load and long-stand DFUs.

CONCLUSIONS

Since patients with high microbial load had a worse outcome, quantitative cultures from DFUs can identify patients who would benefit from antibiotic therapy.

Foot Osteomyelitis Location and Rates of Primary or Secondary Major Amputations in Patients With Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) often leads to amputations in the lower extremity. Data on the influence of the initial anatomical DFO localization on ultimate major amputation are limited.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 583 amputation episodes in 344 patients (78 females, 266 males) were analyzed. All received a form of amputation in combination with antibiotic therapy. A multivariate logistic regression analysis with the primary outcome "major amputation" defined as an amputation above the ankle joint was performed. The association of risk factors including location of DFO, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, neuropathy, nephropathy, and Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 583 episodes, DFO was located in the forefoot in 512 (87.8%), in the midfoot in 43 (7.4%), and in the hindfoot in 28 episodes (4.8%). Overall, 53 of 63 (84.1%) major amputations were performed because of DFO in the setting of peripheral artery disease as primary indication. Overall, limb loss occurred in 6.1% (31/512) of forefoot, 20.9% (9/43) of midfoot, and 46.4% (13/28) of hindfoot DFO. Among these, 22 (41.5%) were performed as the primary treatment, whereas 31 (58.5%) followed previously failed minor amputations. Among this latter group of secondary major amputations, the DFO was localized to the forefoot in 23 of 583 (3.9%), the midfoot in 4 of 583 (0.7%) and the hindfoot in 4 of 583 (0.7%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial hindfoot localization was a significant factor (P < .05), whereas peripheral artery disease, smoking, and a midfoot DFO were not found to be risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective series, the frequency of limb loss in DFO increased with more proximal initial foot DFO lesions, with almost half of patients losing their limbs with a hindfoot DFO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Short and oral antimicrobial therapy for diabetic foot infection: a narrative review of current knowledge

Diabetic foot infection is a frequent complication in long-standing diabetes mellitus. For antimicrobial therapy of this infection, both the optimal duration and the route of administration are often based more on expert opinion than on published evidence. We reviewed the scientific literature, specifically seeking prospective trials, and aimed at addressing two clinical issues: (1) shortening the currently recommended antibiotic duration and (2) using oral (rather than parenteral) therapy, especially after the patient has undergone debridement and revascularization. We also reviewed some older key articles that are critical to our understanding of the treatment of these infections, particularly with respect to diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Our conclusion is that the maximum duration of antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis should be no more than to 4-6 weeks and might even be shorter in selected cases. In the future, in addition to conducting randomized trials and propagating national and international guidance, we should also explore innovative strategies, such as intraosseous antibiotic agents and bacteriophages.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LRINEC Score for Predicting Upper and Lower Extremity Necrotizing Fasciitis

This review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prognostic value of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for detecting necrotizing fasciitis in the extremities. The LRINEC score has been validated in multiple studies as a clinical tool for differentiating necrotizing fasciitis from non-necrotizing infections however many studies do not specify the location of infection. As the prevalence of diabetes and diabetic foot infections continues to rise, the utility of LRINEC scores in these populations becomes of increased importance. Four databases were reviewed for citations between January 2010 and December 2020. English, full text articles reporting the diagnostic effects of LRINEC were utilized in the systematic review portion of this paper. Further inclusion of 2 × 2 tables and discussion specific to the extremities were applied for citations implemented in the meta-analysis. Of the 111 results, 12 citations (n = 932) were included in this review. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LRINEC score ranged from 36% to 77% while specificity ranged from 72% to 93%. Cumulative odds ratio for LRINEC ≥6 among the 4 studies assessing extremity necrotizing fasciitis was 4.3 with p value of <.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 49.39%, 83.17%, 34.91%, and 89.99%, respectively. Accuracy, the classification by whether a patient was correctly classified, was 77.95%. LRINEC score is effective at distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections however the LRINEC's score greatest clinical application may be its ability to rule out necrotizing fasciitis while its ability to accurately identify the presence of infection remains suboptimal.

Antimicrobial TiN-Ag Coatings in Leather Insole for Diabetic Foot

This work reports on TiN-Ag antimicrobial coatings deposited by d.c. magnetron sputtering on leather used for insoles on the footwear industry, studies involving the antimicrobial properties of Ag-based functionalized leathers by sputtering techniques are shown. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) results suggested the presence of crystalline fcc-TiN phase for the sample without silver, and also a fcc-Ag phase in the samples containing silver. According to the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis, the coatings were homogeneous and dispersed Ag clusters were detected on the surface of samples with silver content above 8 at. %. The Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) analysis showed that the ionization of silver over time depends on the morphology of the coatings. The samples did not present cytotoxicity and only samples with incorporated silver presented antibacterial and antifungal activity, highlighting the potential of the TiN-Ag insole coatings for diseases such as diabetic foot.

A Pilot Study to Explore a Correlation between Inflammatory Markers and the Wound Healing Rate in Diabetic Patients

Background and objectives: We examined whether there is a significant correlation between inflammatory markers and the wound healing rate (WHR) in diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients were divided into two groups depending on the completion of wound healing (WH) at 5 weeks: the early WH group (period of WH < 5 weeks; n = 27) and the late WH group (period of WH > 5 weeks; n = 33). The baseline characteristics and wound measurements were compared between the two groups. To identify the correlation between inflammatory markers (e.g., white blood cell counts (WBCs), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) and WHR, we performed a Pearson correlation analysis. Results: The WHR was 8.06 ± 4.02 mm2/day in the early WH group and 2.71 ± 0.88 mm2/day in the late group. This difference reached statistical significance (p < 0.001). Moreover, WBC counts were significantly higher and serum levels of CRP and ESR were significantly lower in the early WH group than in the late group (p = 0.027, 0.036 and 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: Our results indicate that WBC as well as serum CRP and ESR levels have a significant correlation with WHR in diabetic patients.

Opinions about the most appropriate surgical management of diabetes-related foot infection: a cross-sectional survey

Background

There is a lack of high quality evidence to guide the optimal management of diabetes-related foot infection, particularly in cases of severe diabetes-related foot infection and diabetes-related foot osteomyelitis. This study examined the opinions of surgeons about the preferred management of severe diabetes-related foot infection.

Methods

Vascular and orthopaedic surgeons in Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete an online survey via email. The survey included multi-choice and open-ended questions on clinical management of diabetes-related foot infection. Responses of vascular surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons were compared using non-parametric statistical tests. Open-text responses were examined using inductive content analysis.

Results

29 vascular and 20 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey. One-third (28.6%) used best-practice guidelines to assist in decisions about foot infection management. Areas for guideline improvement identified included more specific advice regarding the indications for available treatments, more recommendations about non-surgical patient management and advice on how management can be varied in regions with limited health service resource. The probe-to-bone test and magnetic resonance imaging were the preferred methods of diagnosing osteomyelitis. Approximately half (51.2%) of respondents indicated piperacillin combined with tazobactam as the preferred antibiotic choice for empirical treatment of severe diabetes-related foot infection. Negative pressure wound therapy was the most common way of managing a wound following debridement. All vascular surgeons (100%) made revascularisation decisions based on the severity of ischemia while most orthopaedic surgeons (66.7%) were likely to refer to vascular surgeons to make revascularisation decisions. Vascular surgeons preferred using wound swabs while orthopaedic surgeons favoured tissue or bone biopsies to determine the choice of antibiotic. Respondents perceived a moderate variation in management decisions between specialists and supported the need for randomised controlled trials to test different management pathways.

Conclusions

Most vascular and orthopaedic surgeons do not use best-practice guidelines to assist in decisions about management of diabetes-related foot infection. Vascular and orthopaedic surgeons appear to have different preferences for wound sampling to determine choice of antibiotic. There is a need for higher quality evidence to clarify best practice for managing diabetes-related foot infection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00523-w.

A Review: Matrix Metallopeptidase-9 Nanoparticles Targeted for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetes foot ulcers are a leading cause of death in diabetic individuals. There are very few medicines and treatments that have received regulatory clearance for this indication, and numerous compounds from various pharmacological classes are now in various stages of clinical studies for diabetic foot ulcers treatment. Multiple risk factors contribute to diabetic foot ulcers, including neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, infection, gender, cigarette smoking, and age. The present difficulties in diabetic foot ulcers treatment are related to bacterial resistance to currently utilized antibiotics. Inhibition of the quorum sensing (QS) system and targeting matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9) are promising. This study focuses on the difficulties of existing treatment, current treatment technique, and novel pharmacological targets for diabetic foot ulcer. The electronic data base search diabetic for literature on foot ulcers treatment was carried out using Science Direct, PubMed, Google-Scholar, Springer Link, Scopus, and Wiley up to 2021. Becaplermin, a medication that targets MMP-9, glyceryl trinitrate, which inhibits the bacterial quorum sensing system, probiotic therapy, and nano technological solutions are just a few of the novel pharmaceuticals being developed for diabetic foot ulcers treatment. A combination of therapies, rather than one particular agent, will be the best option for treatment of Diabetes foot ulcer since it is multifactorial factors that render occurs of diabetic foot ulcer.

Retrospective Observational Study on Microbial Contamination of Ulcerative Foot Lesions in Diabetic Patients

According to recent studies, there are almost 435 million people worldwide with diabetes mellitus. It is estimated that of these 148 million will develop Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) during their lifetime, of which 35 to 50% will be infected. In this scenario, the presence and frequency of pathogenic microorganisms and their level of susceptibility to the most frequent classes of antibiotics used to treat this pathological condition from patients with DFUs admitted to the outpatient clinic of vascular surgery of the Federico II University Hospital of Naples from January 2019 to March 2021 were investigated. Furthermore, the diabetic population characteristics under study (i.e., general, clinical, and comorbidities) and the pathogenic bacteria isolated from lesions were also considered. Bacterial strains poorly susceptible to antibiotics were more frequent in polymicrobial infections than in monomicrobial infections. β-Lactams showed the highest levels of resistance, followed by fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and finally macrolides. The main findings of the study demonstrated that the occurrence of resistant microorganisms is the dominant factor in ulcer healing; thus it is essential to investigate the antibiotics’ susceptibility before setting antibiotic therapy to avoid inappropriate prescriptions that would affect the treatment and increase the development and spread of antibiotic resistance.

Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections

Diabetic foot infection is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations worldwide. In addition, diabetes mellitus and sequela of the disease are increasing in prevalence. In 2017, 9.4% of Americans were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). The growing pervasiveness and financial implications of diabetic foot infection (DFI) indicate an acute need for improved clinical assessment and treatment. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current non-invasive imaging modalities have made diagnosis and treatment response challenging. Current anatomical and molecular clinical imaging strategies have mainly targeted the host's immune responses rather than the unique metabolism of the invading microorganism. Advances in imaging have the potential to reduce the impact of these problems and improve the assessment of DFI, particularly in distinguishing infection of soft tissue alone from osteomyelitis (OM). This review presents a summary of the known pathophysiology of DFI, the molecular basis of current and emerging diagnostic imaging techniques, and the mechanistic links of these imaging techniques to the pathophysiology of diabetic foot infections.

Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections

Diabetic foot infection is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations worldwide. In addition, diabetes mellitus and sequela of the disease are increasing in prevalence. In 2017, 9.4% of Americans were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). The growing pervasiveness and financial implications of diabetic foot infection (DFI) indicate an acute need for improved clinical assessment and treatment. Complex pathophysiology and suboptimal specificity of current non-invasive imaging modalities have made diagnosis and treatment response challenging. Current anatomical and molecular clinical imaging strategies have mainly targeted the host's immune responses rather than the unique metabolism of the invading microorganism. Advances in imaging have the potential to reduce the impact of these problems and improve the assessment of DFI, particularly in distinguishing infection of soft tissue alone from osteomyelitis (OM). This review presents a summary of the known pathophysiology of DFI, the molecular basis of current and emerging diagnostic imaging techniques, and the mechanistic links of these imaging techniques to the pathophysiology of diabetic foot infections.

Treatment Failures in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Associated with Concomitant Charcot Arthropathy: The Role of Underlying Arteriopathy

OBJECTIVE

Therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) with Charcot neuroosteoarthropathy is challenging. In patients with diabetic Charcot osteomyelitis (DCO), both the anatomic deformity and infection must be addressed. This study assessed the outcomes of DCO therapy and variables associated with treatment failure and compared them with outcomes of DFO cases.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was performed to compare 93 DCO episodes with 530 DFO episodes, using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Clinical failure occurred in 21.5% of DCO compared with 22.3% in DFO episodes (p=0.89) and was associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) stages 3 or 4 (HR 6.1; CI 2.0-18.1) and chronic treatment with immunosuppressives (HR 7.4; CI 2.0-27.1). Major amputations were significantly more frequent in DCO (28% versus 13.6%; p<0.01) and associated with PAD stages 3 and 4 (HR 8.0; CI 2.2-29.4), smoking (HR 5.4; CI 1.2-24.6), alcohol abuse (HR 3.5; CI 1.1-10.6), and renal dialysis (HR 4.9; CI 1.3-18.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical treatment failures did not differ between DCO and DFO. However, patients with DCO underwent major amputation twice as often as those with DFO. Unlike widespread belief, treatment failure in DCO patients may, similar to DFO, be associated with a striking epidemiological link to severe PAD.

Culturomics Approach to Identify Diabetic Foot Infection Bacteria

The main goal of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of the culturomics approach in the reflection of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) microbial compositions in Poland. Superficial swab samples of 16 diabetic foot infection patients (Provincial Polyclinical Hospital in Toruń, Poland) were subjected to culturing using 10 different types of media followed by the identification via the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and Biotyper platform. Identified 204 bacterial isolates representing 18 different species—mostly Enterococcus faecalis (63%) and Staphylococcus aureus (44%). Most of the infections (81%) demonstrated a polymicrobial character. Great differences in the species coverage, the number of isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and the efficiency of the microbial composition reflection between the investigated media were revealed. The use of commonly recommended blood agar allowed to reveal only 53% of the entire microbial composition of the diabetic foot infection samples, which considerably improved when the chromagar orientation and vancomycin-resistant enterococi agar were applied. In general, efficiency increased in the following order: selective < universal < enriched < differential media. Performed analysis also revealed the impact of the culture media composition on the molecular profiles of some bacterial species, such as Corynebacterium striatum, Proteus mirabilis or Morganella morganii that contributed to the differences in the identification quality. Our results indicated that the culturomics approach can significantly improve the accuracy of the reflection of the diabetic foot infections microbial compositions as long as an appropriate media set is selected. The chromagar orientation and vancomycin-resistant enterococi agar media which were used for the first time to study diabetic foot infection microbial profiles demonstrate the highest utility in the culturomics approach and should be included in further studies directed to find a faster and more reliable diabetic foot infection diagnostic tool.

Impact of wound microbiology on limb preservation in patients with diabetic foot infection

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the association between specific bacterial pathogens and treatment outcome in patients with limb-threatening diabetic foot infection (LT-DFI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients treated for LT-DFI in a major diabetic foot center in Taiwan were analyzed between the years 2014 and 2017. Patients with positive wound culture results at first aid were enrolled. Clinical factors, laboratory data, and wound culture results were compared. Lower-extremity amputations and in-hospital mortality were defined as a poor outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 558 patients, 272 (48.7%) patients had lower extremity amputation and 22 (3.9%) patients had in-hospital mortality. Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infection was the independent factor following factors adjustment. When all the 31 microorganisms were analyzed, only E. coli (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.01; 95% CI, 1.60-5.65), Proteus spp. (aOR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.69-5.29), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (aOR, 2.00; 95% CI 1.20-3.32) were associated with poor outcome. The analysis of specific GNB species in association with major- or minor- amputation have been reported. No specific pathogen was associated with cause of death in patients with mortality within 30 days. The antimicrobial-resistant strains were not associated with a poor treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of GNB was associated with limb amputations. This study provides insight into more timely and appropriate management of the diabetic foot infection.

Biofilms in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Impact, Risk Factors and Control Strategies

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication from diabetes mellitus, with a huge economic, social and psychological impact on the patients' life. One of the main reasons why DFUs are so difficult to heal is related to the presence of biofilms. Biofilms promote wound inflammation and a remarkable lack of response to host defences/treatment options, which can lead to disease progression and chronicity. In fact, appropriate treatment for the elimination of these microbial communities can prevent the disease evolution and, in some cases, even avoid more serious outcomes, such as amputation or death. However, the detection of biofilm-associated DFUs is difficult due to the lack of methods for diagnostics in clinical settings. In this review, the current knowledge on the involvement of biofilms in DFUs is discussed, as well as how the surrounding environment influences biofilm formation and regulation, along with its clinical implications. A special focus is also given to biofilm-associated DFU diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. An overview on promising alternative therapeutics is provided and an algorithm considering biofilm detection and treatment is proposed.

MiR equal than others: MicroRNA enhancement for cutaneous wound healing

Keratinocyte migration is vital in the re-epithelialisation of the skin during wound healing. Multiple factors conspire to impair closure of chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers and pressure wounds. Despite deep mechanistic understanding of microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis and function, the translational potential of these small genetic molecules has not been exploited to promote wound repair. In this review, I focus on miRNAs whose importance for wound healing stems from their impact on epidermal keratinocyte behaviour. These include miR-21-5p, miR-31-5p, miR-132-3p, miR-19b, miR-20a, miR-184, miR-129-5p and miR-335-5p which regulate diverse aspect of keratinocyte biology such as migration, proliferation, differentiation, inflammation and wound closure. A combinatorial approach where two or more miRNA mimics targeting distinct but complementary wound healing processes is proposed as this may enhance wound repair more effectively than any single miRNA mimic alone.

Analysis of the microbiota in the diabetic foot ulcers: Is research standardization required?

Background: Complications of infected wounds in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) are one of the greatest challenges in modern medicine. Analysis of the microbiological profile of infected ulcers may significantly improve treatment results. The aim of the study was to determine the profile of pathogens isolated in patients with DFU and to compare the results of other centers. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 137 patients with DFU hospitalized at the Department of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw in 2011-2014. The analysis included the results of 200 microbiological cultures tested for fungi, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Statistical analysis was used to test differences in HbA1c values in relation to the strain of the most commonly cultured bacteria and the relationship between glycemic control and most frequently isolated pathogens. Results: Seventy-nine bacterial species were isolated in 183 positive cultures. Gram-negative bacteria predominated with the highest percentage of representatives of Enterobacterales. The most often isolated bacteria were Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that HbA1c concentrations were different in groups infected with different strains of bacteria (p = 0.0087). Isolation of Escherichia coli and Morganella morganii was more often associated with poor control of diabetes. Conclusions: The study revealed statistically significant differences in the frequency of microorganisms isolated from the wounds of patients with DFU. The discrepancies in the results of other studies published in this field indicate the need for standardization of the research design.

The Effects of Antimicrobial Resistance and the Compatibility of Initial Antibiotic Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infection

We aimed to determine pathogen microorganisms, their antimicrobial resistance patterns, and the effect of initial treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI). Patients with DFI from 5 centers were included in this multicenter observational prospective study between June 2018 and June 2019. Multivariate analysis was performed for the predictors of reinfection/death and major amputation. A total of 284 patients were recorded. Of whom, 193 (68%) were male and the median age was 59.9 ± 11.3 years. One hundred nineteen (41.9%) patients had amputations, as the minor (n = 83, 29.2%) or major (n = 36, 12.7%). The mortality rate was 1.7% with 4 deaths. A total of 247 microorganisms were isolated from 200 patients. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 36, 14.6%) and Escherichia coli (n = 32, 13.0%). Methicillin resistance rates were 19.4% and 69.6% in S aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp., respectively. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected in 4 of 22 (18.2%) isolates. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria were detected in 20 (38.5%) isolates of E coli (14 of 32) and Klebsiella spp. (6 of 20). When the initial treatment was inappropriate, Klebsiella spp. related reinfection within 1 to 3 months was observed more frequently. Polymicrobial infection (p = .043) and vancomycin treatment (p = .007) were independent predictors of reinfection/death. Multivariate analysis revealed vascular insufficiency (p = .004), hospital readmission (p = .009), C-reactive protein > 130 mg/dL (p = .007), and receiving carbapenems (p = .005) as independent predictors of major amputation. Our results justify the importance of using appropriate narrow-spectrum empirical antimicrobials because higher rates of reinfection and major amputation were found even in the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

Treating Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Practical State-of-the-Art Update

Background and Objectives: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) can be difficult to treat and securing optimal clinical outcomes requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a wide variety of medical, surgical and other health care professionals, as well as the patient. Results of studies conducted in the past few years have allowed experts to formulate guidelines that can improve clinical outcomes. Material and Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on treat- ment of DFO, with an emphasis on studies published in the last two years, especially regarding antimicrobial therapies and surgical approached to treatment of DFO, supplemented by our own extensive clinical and research experience in this field. Results: Major amputations were once com- mon for DFO but, with improved diagnostic and surgical techniques, "conservative" surgery (foot- sparing, resecting only the infected and necrotic bone) is becoming commonplace, especially for forefoot infections. Traditional antibiotic therapy, which has been administered predominantly in- travenously and frequently for several months, can often be replaced by appropriately selected oral antibiotic regimens following only a brief (or even no) parenteral therapy, and given for no more than 6 weeks. Based on ongoing studies, the recommended duration of treatment may soon be even shorter, especially for cases in which a substantial portion of the infected bone has been resected. Using the results of cultures (preferably of bone specimens) and antimicrobial stewardship princi- ples allows clinicians to select evidence-based antibiotic regimens, often of a limited pathogen spec- trum. Intra-osseous antimicrobial and surgical approaches to treatment are also evolving in light of ongoing research. Conclusions: In this narrative, evidenced-based review, taking consideration of principles of antimicrobial stewardship and good surgical practice, we have highlighted the recent literature and offered practical, state-of-the-art advice on the antibiotic and surgical management of DFO.

Osteoarticular infections: a specific program for older patients?

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of elderly patients, arthroplasties, fractures and diabetic foot infections, the worldwide number of osteoarticular infections (OAI) among the elderly is concomitantly expected to rise.

AIMS

We explore existing scientific knowledge about OAI in the frail elderly population.

METHODS

We performed a literature search linking OAIs to geriatric patients and comparing elderly patients (> 65 years) with average adults (range 18-65 years).

RESULTS

In this literature, financial aspects, comparison of diverse therapies on quality of life, reimbursement policies, or specific guidelines or nursing recommendations are missing. Age itself was not an independent factor related to particular pathogens, prevention of OAI, nursing care, and outcomes of OAI. However, geriatric patients were significantly more exposed to adverse events of therapy. They had more co-morbidities and more conservative surgery for OAI.

CONCLUSION

Available literature regarding OAI management among elderly patients is sparse. In recent evaluations, age itself does not seem an independent factor related to particular epidemiology, pathogens, prevention, nursing care, rehabilitation and therapeutic outcomes of OAI. Future clinical research will concern more conservative surgical indications, but certainly reduce inappropriate antibiotic use.

Silver dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most common and serious chronic complications of diabetes. At present, there are many dressings used in the treatment of the diabetic foot. Among them, silver dressings are widely used, but the conclusion has not yet been formed. The purpose of this study is to search for relevant studies on the treatment of DF with silver dressings through evidence-based medicine methods and to draw conclusions with higher levels of evidence to provide a basis for the clinical treatment of DF.

METHODS

Computer search of databases such as CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search time is from the establishment of the database to January 23, 2021. Two researchers will independently select studies, collect data, and assess the methodology quality by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The meta-analysis will be completed by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review will provide an assessment of the current state of DF, aiming to assess the efficacy of silver dressings for patients with DF.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide a credible evidence-based for the clinical treatment of DF with silver dressings.

Utilisation of the 2019 IWGDF diabetic foot infection guidelines to benchmark practice and improve the delivery of care in persons with diabetic foot infections

Aims

To utilise the 2019 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) - diabetic foot infection (DFI) guidelines as an audit tool for clinical practice in patients with diabetes attending a High-Risk Foot Service.

Methods

Data from 93 consecutive patients were collected over a 19-month period in patients attending a High-Risk Foot Service. The diagnosis and management of each patient in the sample were compared against the 2019 IWGDF DFI guidelines, grouped into four categories: Diagnosis, Microbiology, Treatment of soft tissue infection, and Surgical treatment and osteomyelitis. Deficits in performance were recorded using the recommendations as a benchmark standard.

Results

There were 109 DFI events. Nineteen (63%) of the recommendations were met, 7 (24%) were partially met, and four (13%) recommendations were not met. Fourteen of the sample had no documented requests for full blood counts. Tissue was obtained for culture in 32 (29%) of the sample. No percutaneous bone biopsies were performed. Only 13 (28%) patients had intraoperative bone specimens sent for culture and sensitivities, with no bone specimens sent for histopathology. Modification of antibiotic therapy following available culture results was low, occurring in 12 out of 63 possible occasions (19%). The duration of antibiotic regimens in PEDIS 2 infections and osteomyelitis was greater than that recommended.

Conclusions

Utilising the IWGDF DFI guidelines to benchmark clinical practice is a useful tool to identify gaps in clinical performance or service delivery and may help to improve patient care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00448-w.

Surgical OFF-LOADING of the diabetic foot

Diabetic foot ulcer treatment is a challenge for the healthcare world. Widespread infection and the presence of critical ischemia (especially with end-stage renal disease) can lead to major amputation rather than amenable to conservative treatment. Surgical strategies of the diabetic foot have been changing over the past 10 years and are now focused on reconstructive treatment and limb salvage. These goals were achieved, thanks to an evolution of distal revascularization techniques and a distinct approach, which integrates various methods focused on limb salvage. Podoplastic techniques of the diabetic foot are focused on infection clearance, the surgical treatment of corrective deformities, soft tissue coverage and limb ischemia correction along with the management of diabetes and the comorbidities that compromise tissue repair processes. The reconstructive techniques used in diabetic foot treatment owe their effectiveness in part to the results of technological improvements such as the circular external fixator as a tool for stabilization and surgical site protection. In the last decade, many studies have shown that circular external fixation should be considered as the most useful method to protect the reconstructive surgical site in limb salvage of the diabetic foot. The objective of this review is to highlight the role of surgical offloading using circular external fixation as an adjunct to the podoplastic diabetic foot reconstruction procedures.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Phenotypic Detection of MRSA Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infection

Background

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a common and costly complication of diabetes that may be caused by various bacteria with multi-resistant genes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of phenotypic methods for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with genotypic detection of MRSA-related genes.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, swab samples were collected from patients with DFI from hospitals in Sulaimani/Iraq in April–July 2019. All the samples were processed for microbiological assessment and further MRSA phenotypic and genotypic testing.

Results

A total of 46 swab samples were collected from diabetic foot ulcers of 29 males and 17 females. Most samples (93.5%) showed positive growth, with higher proportions of monomicrobial (23; 53.5%) than mixed-bacterial infections (20; 46.5%) and S. aureus as the predominant pathogen. Conventional methods of MRSA detection, such as cefoxitin disc diffusion, can predict methicillin resistance in 45.8% of the cases. Real-time/conventional PCR showed that 41.6% of Staphylococcus aureus were positive for the mecA gene, while none of the isolates was positive for PVL.

Conclusion

Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen in DFI. Although cefoxitin and oxacillin disc diffusion methods can help in the prediction of MRSA, real-time PCR is a reliable method for MRSA detection and confirmation.

Joint Initiative Between Infectious Diseases and Podiatry in Outpatient Settings Improves Outcomes and Adherence to Treatment

BACKGROUND

A joint infectious disease-podiatry clinic (JIDPC) in which an infectious diseases physician and a podiatrist see patients with diabetic foot infections together once a week was initiated in January 2017. This study was designed to investigate if the JIDPC can improve patient adherence and reduce recurrent infections.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with diabetic foot infection admitted to Wheeling Hospital from March 2013 to December 2018 was performed. Initially, the patients were followed by infectious diseases and podiatry in their clinics separately (preintervention group). Beginning January 2017, they were followed together at the JIDPC (postintervention group). Recurrent infection, mortality, and loss to follow-up were compared using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Surgeries were performed in 52.5% of preintervention group participants (n = 99) and 81.9% of postintervention group participants (n = 55; P < .001). The preintervention group was more likely to be lost to follow-up (30.3% vs 9.1%; odds ratio [OR], 4.35 [confidence interval (CI), 1.58-11.99]), but the association was attenuated with further adjustment for surgery (OR 3.35 [CI, 1.17-9.62]). The risk of infection recurrence in 6 months was significantly higher in the preintervention group (36.1% vs 20.8%; OR, 2.16 [CI, 0.99-4.71]), but with further adjustment for surgery, this was not significant (P = .067; OR, 2.17 [CI, 0.95-4.94]). Mortality and 90-day readmission were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of JIDPCs may decrease the incidence of recurrent infections among patients with diabetic foot infections.

A Review and Proposed Classification System for the No-Option Patient With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

A growing, but poorly defined subset of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have "no option" for revascularization. One notable subgroup includes patients with severe ischemia and advanced pedal artery occlusive disease, termed "desert foot," who are at high risk for major amputation due to a lack of conventional revascularization options. Although new therapies are being developed for no-option patients with desert foot anatomy, this subgroup and the broader group of no-option patients are not well defined, limiting the ability to evaluate outcomes. Based on a systematic review, a classification of the no-option CLTI patient was constructed for use in clinical practice and studies. Several no-option conditions were identified, including type I-severe and pedal occlusive disease (desert foot anatomy) for which there is no accepted method of repair; type II-lack of suitable venous conduit for bypass in the setting of an acceptable target for bypass; type III-extensive tissue loss with exposure of vital structures that renders salvage impossible; type IV-advanced medical comorbidities for which available revascularization options would pose a prohibitive risk; and type V-presence of a nonfunctional limb. While type I and type II patients may have no option for revascularization, type III and type V patients have wounds, infection, comorbidities, or functional status that may leave them with few options for revascularization. As treatment strategies continue to evolve and novel methods of revascularization are developed, the ability to identify no-option patients in a standardized fashion will aid in treatment selection and assessment of outcomes.

The Role of Lower Extremity Amputation in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a severe form of peripheral artery disease associated with high rates of limb loss. The primary goal of treatment in CLTI is limb salvage via revascularization. Multidisciplinary teams provide improved care for those with CLTI and lead to improved limb salvage rates. Not all patients are candidates for revascularization, and a subset will require major amputation. This article highlights the role of amputations in the management of CLTI, and describes the patients who should be offered primary amputation.

Pathogens Causing Diabetic Foot Infection and the Reliability of the Superficial Culture

Background: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a severe complication of diabetes and a leading cause of hospitalization in the population with diabetes. Empirical intravenous antibiotic agents are initiated according to guidelines based on previously published data on typical pathogens. Therefore, regular evaluation of the pathogens in DFI and their resistance is important to validate current therapies. We evaluated the most current data on bacterial cultures in patients treated at our hospital for DFI and the resistance to the most common antibiotic agents, as well as the reliability of superficial cultures compared with deep tissue cultures. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study was performed at the University Hospital of Tampere and comprised 325 patients with 405 hospitalizations for DFI during the years 2010-2014. Results: The most frequent pathogens in superficial and deep samples were Staphylococcus aureus (36.9%), gram-negative bacilli (24.6%), and β-hemolytic streptococci (BHS, 19.5%). Septicemia was caused most often by Staphylococcus aureus and BHS (34.6% each). The specificity of superficial culture was 91.8%-92.8% and sensitivity 66.7%-87.5%. Conclusions: This study indicates the need to cover Staphylococcus aureus, BHS, and gram-negative bacilli when treating DFI. The reliability of superficial culture was surprisingly good.

Designed sponges based on chitosan and cyclodextrin polymer for a local release of ciprofloxacin in diabetic foot infections

Diabetic foot infections are the most common complications requiring hospitalisation of patients with diabetes. They often result in amputation to extremities and are associated with high morbi-mortality rates, especially when bone is infected. Treatment of these complications is based on surgical procedures, nursing care and systemic antibiotic therapy for several weeks, with a significant risk of relapse. Due to low blood flow and damage caused by diabetic foot infection, blood supply is decreased, causing low antibiotic diffusion in the infected site and an increase of possible bacterial resistance, making this type of infection particularly difficult to treat. In this context, the aim of this work was to develop a medical device for local antibiotic release. The device is a lyophilized physical hydrogel, i.e a sponge based on two oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (chitosan and poly(cyclodextrin citrate)). Cyclodextrins, via inclusion complexes, increase drug bioavailability and allow an extended release. Using local release administration increases concentrations in the wound without risk of toxicity to the body and prevents the emergence of resistant bacteria. The hydrogel was characterised by rheology. After freeze-drying, a curing process was implemented. The swelling rate and cell viability were evaluated, and finally, the sponge was impregnated with a ciprofloxacin solution to evaluate its drug release profile and its antibacterial activity.

Efficacy of phage cocktail AB-SA01 therapy in diabetic mouse wound infections caused by multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus. Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from DFU infections. Bacteriophages (phages) represent an alternative or adjunct treatment to antibiotic therapy. Here we describe the efficacy of AB-SA01, a cocktail of three S. aureus Myoviridae phages, made to current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) standards, and which has undergone two phase I clinical trials, in treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus infections.

RESULTS

Wounds of saline-treated mice showed no healing, but expanded and became inflamed, ulcerated, and suppurating. In contrast, AB-SA01 treatment decreased the bacterial load with efficacy similar or superior to vancomycin treatment. At the end of the treatment period, there was a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in bacterial load and wound size in infected phage- and vancomycin-treated groups compared with infected saline-treated mice. In phage-treated mice, wound healing was seen similar to vancomycin treatment. No mortality was recorded associated with infections, and post-mortem examinations did not show any evident pathological lesions other than the skin wounds. No adverse effects related to the application of phages were observed.

CONCLUSION

Topical application of phage cocktail AB-SA01 is effective, as shown by bacterial load reduction and wound closure, in the treatment of diabetic wound infections caused by MDR S. aureus. Our results suggest that topical phage cocktail treatment may be effective in treating antibiotic-resistant S. aureus DFU infections.

Are Antimicrobial Peptide Dendrimers an Escape from ESKAPE?

Significance: The crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) increases dramatically despite all efforts to use available antibiotics or last resort antimicrobial agents. The spread of the AMR, declared as one of the most important health-related issues, warrants the development of new antimicrobial strategies. Recent Advances: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and AMP dendrimers (AMPDs), as well as polymer dendrimers are relatively new and promising strategies with the potential to overcome drug resistance issues arising in ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) colonizing chronic wounds. Critical Issues: AMPs-AMPDs suffer from limited efficacy, short-lasting bioactivity, and concerns of toxicity. To circumvent these drawbacks, their covalent coupling to biopolymers and/or encapsulation into different drug carrier systems is investigated, with a special focus on topical applications. Future Directions: Scientists and the pharmaceutical industry should focus on this challenging subject to either improve the activity of existing antimicrobial agents or find new drug candidates. The focus should be put on the discovery of new drugs or the combination of existing drugs for a better synergy, taking into account all kinds of wounds and existing pathogens, and more specifically on the development of next-generation antimicrobial peptides, encompassing the delivery carrier toward improved pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

Principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic antibiotic therapy in persons with a diabetic foot infection (DFI) is frequent, increasing the risk of promoting resistance to common pathogens. Applying principles of antibiotic stewardship may help avoid this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

We performed a systematic review of the literature, especially seeking recently published studies, for data on the role and value of antibiotic stewardship (especially reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy) in community and hospital populations of persons with a DFI.

SUMMARY

We found very few publications specifically concerning antibiotic stewardship in persons with a DFI. The case-mix of these patients is substantial and infection plays only one part among several chronic problems. As with other types of infections, attempting to prevent infections and avoiding or reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy are perhaps the best ways to reduce antibiotic prescribing in the DFI population. The field is complex and necessitates knowledge over the current scientific literature and clinical experience. On a larger scale, clinical pathways, guidelines, and recommendations are additionally supportive.