1
|
Salluh JIF, Póvoa P, Beane A, Kalil A, Sendagire C, Sweeney DA, Pilcher D, Polverino E, Tacconelli E, Estenssoro E, Frat JP, Ramirez J, Reyes LF, Roca O, Nseir S, Nobre V, Lisboa T, Martin-Loeches I. Challenges for a broad international implementation of the current severe community-acquired pneumonia guidelines. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:526-538. [PMID: 38546855 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains one of the leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit, thus consuming a large share of resources and is associated with high mortality rates worldwide. The evidence generated by clinical studies in the last decade was translated into recommendations according to the first published guidelines focusing on severe community-acquired pneumonia. Despite the advances proposed by the present guidelines, several challenges preclude the prompt implementation of these diagnostic and therapeutic measures. The present article discusses the challenges for the broad implementation of the sCAP guidelines and proposes solutions when applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge I F Salluh
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
- Postgraduate Program of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Brazil.
| | - Pedro Póvoa
- NOVA Medical School, CHRC, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Research Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Abi Beane
- Pandemic Science Hub and Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- NICS-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Andre Kalil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Cornelius Sendagire
- Anesthesia and Critical Care, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Daniel A Sweeney
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - David Pilcher
- Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Commercial Road3004, Prahran, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell, Australia
| | - Eva Polverino
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisa Estenssoro
- Hospital Interzonal de Agudos General San Martín, Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean-Pierre Frat
- CHU de Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France
- INSERM, CIC-1402, IS-ALIVE, Faculté de Médecine Et de Pharmacie de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Julio Ramirez
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY, USA
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Luis Felipe Reyes
- Unisabana Center for Translational Science, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oriol Roca
- Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut de Recerca Part Taulí - I3PT, Parc del Taulí 1, 08028, Sabadell, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Saad Nseir
- Centre de Réanimation, CHU de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
- Team Fungal Associated Invasive and Inflammatory Diseases, Lille Inflammation Research International Center, Université de Lille, INSERM U995, Lille, France
| | - Vandack Nobre
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Thiago Lisboa
- Critical Care Department, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciencias Pneumologicas, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization, St. James's University Hospital, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kandie R, Ochola R, Njaanake K. Evaluation of fluorescent in-situ hybridization technique for diagnosis of malaria in Ahero Sub-County hospital, Kenya. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18:22. [PMID: 29310580 PMCID: PMC5759278 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2875-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Treatment of malaria in a timely manner could avert deaths. Treatment ultimately relies on the rapid and accurate diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a cytogenetic technique based on detection of specific nucleic acid, has the potential to address the limitations of the current diagnostic approaches. This study investigates further the performance of FISH for the diagnosis of malaria in a rural setting in Western Kenya. METHODS Blood samples from 302 patients presenting with fever (temperature ≥ 37.5 °C) were examined for malaria using the Giemsa microscopy (GM), rapid diagnostic test (RDT), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and FISH. RESULTS The sensitivity and specificity of FISH was 85.6% and 96.2% respectively, while the corresponding values for GM were 82.2% and 100% respectively. RDT and PCR had sensitivities of 91.1% and 98.9%, respectively with their specificities being 89.6 and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive values for RDT, GM, FISH and PCR were 78.8%, 100%, 90.6% and 100%, respectively. The negative predictive values for RDT, GM, FISH and PCR were 96.0%, 93.0%, 94.0% and 99.5%, respectively. Their respective diagnostic accuracies were 90.1%, 94.7% 93.0% and 99.7%. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates that the specificity and reproducibility of FISH assays are high, thus adding to the growing evidence on the potential of the technique as an effective tool for the detection of malaria parasites in remote settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Kandie
- Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
- National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Kariuki Njaanake
- Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|