Multicenter clinical experience of real life Dalbavancin use in gram-positive infections

The future approach for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the new available options for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and how to implement in the clinical practice innovative approaches for their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The availability of long-acting antibiotics, including dalbavancin and oritavancin, changed the approach to patients with ABSSSI. Direct discharge from the emergency department and early discharge from the hospital should be considered in patients with ABSSSI. Despite limited data about different bactericidal properties, the choice between dalbavancin and oritavacin is usually based on patients' characteristics and comorbidities. Delafloxacin and omadacycline are other options and have the advantage to be available for both intravenous and oral formulations, allowing a sequential therapy and switch from intravenous to oral treatment in clinically stable patients. Further studies should elucidate the profile of patients who may beneficiate from these drugs.

SUMMARY

Early discharge from the hospital should be considered in patients with ABSSSI at a high risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and in vulnerable patients for which hospitalization may have detrimental consequences. In elderly individuals, patients with diabetes mellitus, oncological people who need for continuing their healthcare pathway, this approach may reduce complications and costs related to hospitalization.

Common Bacterial Infections in Persons Who Inject Drugs

Opioid use in the United States has increased dramatically. Bacterial infections are common among persons who inject drugs (PWID), and there is a disparity in the care these individuals receive. As such, outcomes associated with these infections can be poor. Healthcare providers can address these disparities through optimal pharmacotherapy recommendations and assistance with changing approaches to the management of PWID.

Dalbavancin for prosthetic joint infections: Empirical treatment

OBJECTIVES

Bone and joint infections are complex and require a long course of antibiotics. Dalbavancin is a long half-life lipoglycopeptide, only indicated for skin and soft tissue infections. Studies on bone and joint diffusion are promising. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam for intra-operative treatment of knee or hip prosthetic joint infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective and bicentric study was conducted between 2018 and 2022 and included 56 patients. The criteria used to diagnose prosthetic joint infections were those established in 2011 by the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS), modified in 2013 at the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infections. The efficacy endpoint was the absence of relapse during the two-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Gram-positive cocci infections were the most common. All Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to dalbavancin. The cure rate at two years was 91.5%. Only four patients experienced treatment failure. Few adverse events were reported, mainly digestive ones (diarrhea and pain).

CONCLUSION

This study provides data outside of the marketing authorization, while respecting the authorized dosage in a population of patients with clearly defined inclusion criteria and a two-year follow-up.

Long-Acting Antibiotics: New Opportunities Beyond Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs)!

Currently, two long-acting antibiotics are available: oritavancin (ORI) and dalbavancin (DBV) [...].

Dalbavancin as sequential therapy in infective endocarditis: Real-life experience in elder and comorbid patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dalbavancin as sequential therapy in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) due to gram positive bacteria (GPB) in a real-life heterogenous cohort with comorbid patients.

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study including all patients with definite IE treated with dalbavancin between January 2017 and February 2022 was developed. A 6-month follow-up was performed. The main outcomes were clinical cure rate, clinical and microbiological relapse, 6-month mortality, and adverse effects (AEs) rate.

RESULTS

The study included 61 IE episodes. The median age was 78.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63.2-85.2), 78.7% were male, with a median Charlson comorbidity index of 7 (IQR 4-9) points. Overall, 49.2% suffered native valve IE. The most common microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus (26.3%) followed by Enterococcus faecalis (21.3%). The median duration of initial antimicrobial therapy and dalbavancin therapy were 27 (IQR 20-34) and 14 days (IQR 14-28) respectively. The total reduction of hospitalization was 1090 days. The most frequent dosage was 1500mg of dalbavancin every 14 days (96.7%). An AE was detected in 8.2% of patients, only one (1.6%) was attributed to dalbavancin (infusion reaction). Clinical cure was achieved in 86.9% of patients. One patient (1.6%) with Enterococcus faecalis IE suffered relapse. The 6-month mortality was 11.5%, with only one IE-related death (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a high efficacy of dalbavancin in a heterogeneous real-world cohort of IE patients, with an excellent safety profile. Dalbavancin allowed a substantial reduction of in-hospital length of stay.

A systematic review of dalbavancin efficacy as a sequential therapy for infective endocarditis

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.

METHODS

We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023430032.

Dalbavancin as consolidation antibiotic treatment in infective endocarditis, cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and bacteremia: Clinical experience of 7 years

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin (DBV), a novel lipoglycopeptide with activity against Gram-positive bacterial infections, is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). It has linear dose-related pharmacokinetics allowing a prolonged interval between doses. It would be a good option for the treatment of patients with Gram-positive cardiovascular infections.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with cardiovascular infection (infective endocarditis, bacteremia, implantable electronic device infection) treated with DBV at Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) for 7 years (2016-2022). Patients were divided in two study groups: 1) Infective endocarditis (IE), 2) Bacteremia. Epidemiological, clinical, microbiological and therapeutic data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were treated with DBV for cardiovascular infection. IE was the most common indication (68%), followed by bacteremia (32%) with male predominance in both groups (64% vs 62%) and median age of 67,7 and 57,5 years, respectively. 100% of blood cultures were positive to Gram-positive microorganisms (Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp.) in both study groups. Previously to DBV, all patients received other antibiotic therapy, both in the group of IE (median: 80 days) as in bacteremia (14,8 days). The main reason for the administration of DBV was to continue intravenous antimicrobial therapy outside the hospital in both the EI group (n = 15) and the bacteremia group (n = 8). DBV was used as consolidation therapy in a once- or twice-weekly regimen. Microbiological and clinical successes were reached in 84% of cases (n = 21), 76,4% in IE group and 100% in bacteremia group. No patient documented adverse effects during long-term dalbavancin treatment.

CONCLUSION

DBV is an effective and safety treatment as consolidation antibiotic therapy in IE and bacteremia produced by Gram-positive microorganisms.

Dalbavancin Use in Bone and Joint Infections

Background

Dalbavancin (DAL) off-label use for treating bone and joint infections has increased especially as long-term intravenous access is not needed. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of its use.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, descriptive study included adults treated with DAL for bone or joint infections over a 4-year period (2019-2023). Patient demographics, infection type and location, pre-DAL antibiotic and surgical treatments, indication for DAL, and clinical outcomes were collected. Risk factor analysis for 1-year infection recurrence was performed.

Results

There were 58 patient encounters of bone and/or joint infections treated with DAL. The majority of patients were treated for osteomyelitis (81.0%) followed by native (8.6%) and peri-prosthetic (10.4%) joint infection. Fifty (86.2%) patients underwent surgical intervention, and 17 (68%) of the 25 patients with infected hardware had full hardware removal. The most common pathogen identified was Staphylococcus aureus (41; 70.7%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in 23 (40.0%) cases. Ten (17.2%) patients had recurrence within 1 year. Hardware removal was found to significantly decrease the risk of infection recurrence (P = .026). None of the peri-prosthetic joint infection patients had infection recurrence within 1 year.

Conclusions

Our findings support DAL as an effective treatment for bone and joint infection when combined with surgical debridement and hardware removal. Failure to remove infected hardware significantly increased the risk of infection recurrence within 1 year. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further support DAL as a novel treatment for orthopedic infections.

Antibiotics with antibiofilm activity - rifampicin and beyond

The management of prosthetic joint infections is a complex and multilayered process that is additionally complicated by the formation of bacterial biofilm. Foreign material provides the ideal grounds for the development of an intricate matrix that hinders treatment and creates a difficult environment for antibiotics to act. Surgical intervention is often warranted but requires appropriate adjunctive therapy. Despite available guidelines, several aspects of antibiotic therapy with antibiofilm activity lack clear definition. Given the escalating challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance, extended treatment durations, and tolerance issues, it is essential to ensure that antimicrobials with antibiofilm activity are both potent and diverse. Evidence of biofilm-active drugs is highlighted, and alternatives to classical regimens are further discussed.

Simulated Target Attainment of Multidose Regimens of Dalbavancin for Prolonged Durations of Therapy

Background

Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that is increasingly utilized for infections that require prolonged treatment durations despite the lack of Food and Drug Administration approval for these indications. There is no consensus regarding optimal dosing of dalbavancin for these infections and no available pharmacokinetic studies to identify optimal dosing for long-term use.

Methods

An in silico pharmacokinetic simulation was performed to assess the predicted dalbavancin concentration resulting from commonly utilized dosing regimens, in addition to modified regimens. The primary endpoint evaluated was days of median 24-hour free area under the curve over the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) >27.1, the established PK target.

Results

A dosing regimen of 1500 mg on day 0 and day 7 resulted in median AUC/breakpoint value above the target for 57 days (lower 95% confidence interval [CI], 37 days). A modified regimen of 1500 mg on day 0 and day 21 resulted in an additional 11 days of median AUC/breakpoint target attainment. The other standard dosing regimen modeled was 1000 mg on day 0, then 500 mg weekly for 5 doses. This regimen achieved the AUC/breakpoint target for 76 days (lower 95% CI, 59 days). This regimen was modified to 1000 mg on day 0, then 500 mg on days 14 and 28, which shortened the median effective treatment duration by 14 days but required 3 fewer doses.

Conclusions

These simulated results, when combined with the favorable observational data, support the use of commonly reported dalbavancin regimens for prolonged therapy durations. In addition, these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data support extending the dosing interval beyond the frequently reported weekly regimens, which should be investigated further with a clinical trial.

Head-to-head comparison of multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for complicated infections: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Oritavancin and dalbavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Recently, they have been used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy for complicated infections. No head-to-head studies exist for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of patients treated with multiple doses of oritavancin or dalbavancin for complicated infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients who received two or more doses of lipoglycopeptides for complicated infections from February 2019 through December 2022. Patients receiving oritavancin were compared to dalbavancin after propensity score-matching. The primary endpoint was clinical success at 90 days. Other endpoints included: 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and changes in white blood cell count and inflammatory markers after the first dose.

RESULTS

After exclusions and propensity score-matching, 131 matched pairs (N = 262) were included in the analysis. Most patients were receiving lipoglycopeptide therapy for osteomyelitis. There was no significant difference in clinical success at 90 days in patients who received oritavancin compared to those who received dalbavancin (99 [76%] vs. 103 [79%], respectively; P = 0.556). There was no significant difference in secondary endpoints, however, there was a trend towards higher incidence of ADRs oritavancin compared to dalbavancin (9 [7%] vs. 2 [2%], respectively; P = 0.060) which led to more treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in efficacy between multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of complicated infections. Both agents were generally well tolerated; however, dalbavancin may be better tolerated when long-term treatment is warranted.

Three-years of dalbavancin use at a UK tertiary referral hospital serving a population with high numbers of people who inject drugs

Background

Dalbavancin's unique properties have led to an increase in its off-licence use in complex infection and in vulnerable populations including people who inject drugs (PWID), but data remain limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we describe the characteristics, treatment rationale and outcomes for all adult inpatients treated with dalbavancin at a UK tertiary hospital.

Results

Fifty-eight inpatients were treated with dalbavancin between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2021, 98.3% for off-licence diagnoses. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, infective endocarditis and endovascular infections were each diagnosed in 22.4% of patients. Bone and joint infections were diagnosed in 18.9%, discitis in 12.1% and central line-associated bloodstream infections in 5.2%. Sixty-nine percent of patients were bacteraemic; 52.5% Staphylococcus aureus, 5.0% MRSA. Two mild adverse reactions were attributed to dalbavancin. Treatment was successful in 43 (75.4%) patients, and failed in seven (12.3%). Seven (12.3%) were lost to follow-up.Thirty-five patients (60.3%) were PWID, with low median age (41.0 years) and Charlson Comorbidity scores (0). Self-discharge was taken by 17.1% of PWID, and 20.6% were lost to follow-up. At 90 days, three (8.6%) PWID were deceased.

Conclusions

In this first UK cohort, dalbavancin was used off licence and in persons facing barriers to conventional therapies. Where data is available, it was safe and effective. Dalbavancin appears a potentially valuable tool in improving outcomes for PWID.

Experience with dalbavancin use in various gram-positive infections within Aberdeen Royal Infirmary OPAT service

PURPOSE

Dalbavancin, approved in 2014 for Gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), has pharmacokinetics enabling treatment with one or two doses. Dalbavancin might be useful in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) of deep-seated infections, otherwise requiring inpatient admission. We documented our experience with pragmatic dalbavancin use to assess its effectiveness for varied indications, on- and off-label, as primary or sequential consolidation therapy.

METHODS

Patients prescribed dalbavancin between 1 December 2021 and 1 October 2022 were screened for demographics of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), allergies, pathogens, doses of dalbavancin, other antibiotics administered and surgery. Where available, infection markers were recorded. The primary outcome was a cure at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included any adverse events and for those with treatment failures, response to salvage antibiotics.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven per cent of patients were cured. Cure rates by indication were 93% for ABSSSI, 100% for bacteraemia, 90% for acute osteomyelitis, 0% for chronic osteomyelitis, 75% for native joint septic arthritis and 33% for prosthetic joint infection. Most bone and joint infections that were not cured did not have source control, and the goal of treatment was suppressive. Successful suppression rates were greater at 48% for chronic osteomyelitis and 66% for prosthetic joint infections. Adverse events occurred in 14 of 102 patients.

CONCLUSION

This report adds to clinical experience with dalbavancin for off-label indications whilst further validating its role in ABSSSI. Dalbavancin as primary therapy in deep-seated infections merits investigation in formal clinical trials.

Real-World Dalbavancin Use for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: Comparing Outcomes Between People Who Use and Do Not Use Drugs

Background

Dalbavancin has been used off-label to treat invasive bacterial infections in vulnerable populations like people who use drugs (PWUD) because of its broad gram-positive coverage and unique pharmacological properties. This retrospective, multisite study examined clinical outcomes at 90 days in PWUD versus non-PWUD after secondary treatment with dalbavancin for bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and epidural abscesses.

Methods

Patients at 3 teaching hospitals who received dalbavancin for an invasive infection between March 2016 and May 2022 were included. Characteristics of PWUD and non-PWUD, infection highlights, hospital stay and treatment, and outcomes were compared using χ2 for categorical variables, t test for continuous variables, and nonparametric tests where appropriate.

Results

There were a total of 176 patients; 78 were PWUD and 98 were non-PWUD. PWUD were more likely to have a patient-directed discharge (26.9% vs 3.1%; P < .001) and be lost to follow-up (20.5% vs 7.14%; P < .01). Assuming loss to follow-up did not achieve clinical cure, 73.1% of PWUD and 74.5% of non-PWUD achieved clinical cure at 90 days (P = .08).

Conclusions

Dalbavancin was an effective treatment option for invasive gram-positive infections in our patient population. Despite higher rates of patient-directed discharge and loss to follow-up, PWUD had similar rates of clinical cure at 90 days compared to non-PWUD.

Dalbavancin real-life utilization among diabetic patients suffering from infections in Italy and Spain: The DALBADIA retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively describe the patterns of use of dalbavancin for treating infections in diabetic patients in Italian and Spanish standard clinical practice.

METHODS

DALBADIA [NCT04959799] was a multicentre, observational, retrospective cohort study, conducted in Italy and Spain. The study enrolled 97 adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, treated with dalbavancin as per standard clinical practice for a Gram-positive bacterial infection or the Gram-positive component of a mixed infection.

RESULTS

Dalbavancin was used to treat cellulitis (18/92 patients, 19.6%), followed by prosthetic joint infection (14 patients, 15.2%), endocarditis (13 patients, 14.1%), and primary bacteraemia (10 patients, 10.9%); 78/92 (84.8%) patients had Gram-positive infections only, and 14 (15.2%) had mixed infections. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus in 43 (55.8% of the patients with microbial isolation), 25.6% of which methicillin-resistant; Staphylococcus epidermidis in 13 (16.9%), 53.8% of which methicillin-resistant; Enterococcus faecalis in 11 (14.3%). The main reason for the dalbavancin choice was the intent to simplify the antibiotic regimen (81.5% of cases). A multidisciplinary team participated in the treatment choice process for 53 (57.6%) patients. Dalbavancin was given as first-line antibiotic in 34 (37.0%) patients and administered as one infusion in 32 (34.8%), and as two infusions in 39 (42.4%). In total, 57/62 (91.9%) eligible patients with available assessment were judged clinically cured or improved at the end of observation.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, dalbavancin was used in diabetic patients to treat ABSSSIs and other difficult-to-treat infections with a favourable safety profile and a high rate of positive clinical responses.

Dalbavancin Sequential Therapy for Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting lipoglycopeptides such as dalbavancin may have utility in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), particularly in those with barriers to discharge or who require prolonged parenteral antibiotic courses. A retrospective cohort study was performed to provide further multicenter real-world evidence on dalbavancin use as a sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients received dalbavancin with Gram-positive BSI, defined as any positive blood culture or diagnosed with infective endocarditis, from 13 centers geographically spread across the United States between July 2015 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (17.5) years, the majority were male (54%), with many who injected drugs (40%). The most common infection sources (non-exclusive) were primary BSI (89%), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) (25%), infective endocarditis (19%), and bone and joint infection (17%). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 72% of index cultures, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus accounted for 18%, and Streptococcus species in 16%. Dalbavancin started a median (Q1-Q3) of 10 (6-19) days after index culture collection. The most common regimen administered was dalbavancin 1500 mg as one dose for 50% of cases. The primary outcome of composite clinical failure occurred at 12.2%, with 90-day mortality at 7.0% and 90-day BSI recurrence at 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin may serve as a useful tool in facilitating hospital discharge in patients with Gram-positive BSI. Randomized controlled trials are anticipated to validate dalbavancin as a surrogate to current treatment standards.

New Frontier on Antimicrobial Therapy: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides

Long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, are semisynthetic antibiotics known for their strong effectiveness against a wide array of Gram-positive bacteria. This includes Staphylococcus aureus, both methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), streptococci, and vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecalis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and on ClinicalTrials.gov to identify articles published until July 2023 investigating the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in clinical practice. The review included case reports, case series, observational studies, and clinical studies. Although more consistent data are needed, LGPs seem to be a good alternative that may provide a quicker hospital discharge and reduce long-term intravenous access and therapy. This is attributed to their unique pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics. More quality data (i.e., number of patients treated with clinical success) are needed before clinicians may use these therapies more widely.

Dalbavancin as an alternative to traditional outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for deep gram-positive infections - an observational, retrospective review

Background

Treatment of invasive gram-positive infections in complex patient populations is challenging. Dalbavancin, approved for skin and soft tissue infections, offers advantages in this setting due to its long half-life and infrequent dosing. However, less is known about the outcomes of off-label dalbavancin for deeper infections.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to examine the feasibility and outcomes of patients with complex gram-positive infections treated with dalbavancin as an alternative to standard outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of adult patients managed within an OPAT program with intravenous dalbavancin for off-label indications. Adult patients were included if they had treatment details and follow-up documented between January 2020 and June 2023. Details of dalbavancin use including indications for prescription were captured. Outcomes of interest included 90-day infection recurrence, prosthesis retention rates, 90-day mortality, and adverse medication events.

Results

In all, 61 patients received dalbavancin, mostly as sequential therapy. Twenty-three percent received dalbavancin strictly in the outpatient setting. Dalbavancin was used primarily for hardware (fracture, spine, or joint), native bone or joint, and complicated soft tissue infections. The predominant pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (61%). Dalbavancin was frequently prescribed as a two-dose 1500 mg regimen (49%) due to persistent infection (23%), difficult line access (30%), difficulty achieving therapeutic vancomycin levels (18%), or substance abuse history (18%). Overall, six patients (10%) had infection recurrence and no patients died during the follow-up period. Three of eight patients with hardware retention had infection recurrence. Adverse effects were minimal and mostly self-limiting.

Conclusion

Dalbavancin is an efficacious and safe alternative to standard OPAT, especially in those with barriers to traditional long-term intravenous antibiotics. Improved outcomes may be achieved with hardware removal. Dalbavancin may facilitate early discharge or prevent hospitalizations. Comparative studies of standard OPAT regimens versus dalbavancin are needed.

The efficacy of dalbavancin and impact on hospitalization and treatment costs in patients with ABSSSI

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) represent a common and costly healthcare burden, accounting for millions of annual infections and billions of dollars in healthcare expenditures. Dalbavancin is a long-acting glycopeptide antibiotic that has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of ABSSSIs. This review article will examine the efficacy of dalbavancin and focus on its impact on the hospital length of stay and costs associated with management of these infections.

Dalbavancin plasma concentrations in 133 patients: a PK/PD observational study

OBJECTIVES

Limited pharmacokinetics data support dalbavancin long-term use in off-label indications and the optimal dosing regimen is debated. We aimed to describe dalbavancin concentrations in an observational retrospective multicentre study.

METHODS

Patients from 13 French hospitals, treated with 1500 mg doses of dalbavancin and for whom therapeutic drug monitoring was performed from June 2018 to March 2021 were included. Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were described at peak and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after the last 1500 mg dose. Concentrations in patients weighing more or less than 75 kg and with a GFR greater or less than 60 mL/min were compared. Microbiological data were collected and dalbavancin MIC was measured when possible.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three patients were included (69% treated for bone and joint infections, 16% for endocarditis). Thirty-five patients received a single dose of dalbavancin and 98 received several administrations. Two, 3 and 4 weeks after the last dose, median plasma concentrations were respectively 25.00, 14.80 and 9.24 mg/L for the first doses and 34.55, 22.60 and 19.20 mg/L for the second or subsequent doses. Weight and renal function had an impact on pharmacokinetics. Infection was documented in 105 patients (Staphylococcus spp. in 68% of cases). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 32.5% of cases (median MIC: 0.047 mg/L) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 27% of cases (median MIC of 0.047 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma concentrations of dalbavancin were consistent with those described in clinical trials and those sought during the industrial development of the molecule.

Ototoxicity associated with extended dalbavancin treatment for a shoulder prosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, administered as a single or two-dose treatment. The extended half-life, good penetration into bone and synovial fluid, and bactericidal activity against gram-positive bacteria, including those in biofilm, make dalbavancin an appealing choice for treatment of bone and joint infections in outpatient settings. However, we present a rare case of ototoxicity associated with off-label extended dalbavancin treatment of a prosthetic joint infection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 55-year-old man with a prosthetic joint infection of the shoulder underwent off-label extended dalbavancin treatment, receiving a cumulative dose of 2500 mg. The patient experienced a gradual onset of hearing loss following the first dose, leading to a diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss that persisted 1 year after dalbavancin was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report highlights the importance of exercising caution when administering dalbavancin beyond approved dosing guidelines, and emphasizes the need for vigilance regarding the potential for ototoxicity.

Effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in France: a prospective, multicentre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. However, several studies have suggested that it is used mostly for off-label indications. We aimed to describe the use of dalbavancin in patients who received at least one dose of the antibiotic in France.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, multicentre study conducted in France from September 2018 to April 2020. The primary outcome was the clinical response at 30 days after the last dalbavancin dose.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients in 16 centres were included in this study. The main infection sites were bone and joint infections (55.0%), multisite infections (15.9%), and vascular infections (14.6%), and the primary pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (N = 82), Staphylococcus aureus (N = 51), and enterococci (N = 27). Most patients (71.5%) received three previous antibiotic treatments. The number of dalbavancin injections per patient was 1 in 26 patients (17.2%), 2 in 95 patients (62.9%), 3 in 17 patients (11.3%), and more than 3 in 13 patients (8.6%), with a mean cumulative dose of 3089 ± 1461 mg per patient. Among the 129 patients with a complete follow-up, clinical success was achieved in 119 patients (92.2%). At least 1 adverse event was reported in 67 patients (44.4%), including 12 (7.9%) patients with dalbavancin-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study showed that dalbavancin is used mostly for off-label indications and in heavily pretreated patients in France. The clinical response at 30 days after the last dose was favourable in most patients, with a good safety profile.

A Narrative Review on the Role of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections

Bone and joint infections (BJI) require prolonged antimicrobial treatment, leading to lengthy hospitalizations, high costs, the risk of nosocomial infections, and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Dalbavancin is a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide approved for the treatment of adults and children with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. This narrative review aims to summarize the characteristics of dalbavancin and the current scientific evidence regarding its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of BJI. A literature search until June 2023 was performed to identify all published research about the role of dalbavancin in the management of BJI. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics characterized by prolonged half-life, high bactericidal activity against most Gram-positive bacteria, a good safety profile, and high tissue penetration, dalbavancin can be a valuable alternative to the treatment of BJI. Clinical studies have shown its non-inferiority compared to conventional therapies in BJI, offering potent activity against key pathogens and an extended dosing interval that may shorten hospitalization. In conclusion, dalbavancin represents a promising treatment option for BJI with a favorable safety profile, but further research in both adults and particularly children, who are ideal candidates for long-acting antibiotics, is necessary to evaluate the role of dalbavancin in BJI.

Experience with dalbavancin for long-term antimicrobial suppression of left ventricular assist device infections

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a common strategy for management of end-stage heart failure. LVADs carry a risk of infection of the implanted device components, and skin flora are commonly implicated. Long-term antibiotics may be needed for management of deep device infection or recurrent superficial infections. In appropriately selected patients, dalbavancin can be a feasible option given its extended dosing interval.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center review of patients presenting with an LVAD infection between January 2011 and November 2022, where management included the use of dalbavancin. Data regarding LVAD placement, details of index infection, dalbavancin use and outcomes was obtained from chart review, and documented in a RedCap database.

RESULTS

The mean time from LVAD placement to index infection was 131.6 weeks (standard deviation 87.2 weeks). The most common targeted organism was Corynebacterium striatum in six of 10 patients. Index infection presented as deep driveline infection in four patients and recurrent superficial driveline infection in three patients. Five patients had a concurrent bloodstream infection. Dalbavancin was discontinued in two patients due to breakthrough infection, with one patient requiring surgical intervention. No drug-related adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin is an attractive option in the management of long-term LVAD infection in patients for whom alternative oral or parenteral antibiotics are not a feasible option. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal dosing of dalbavancin in this setting, and to study adverse events and long-term outcomes of dalbavancin.

Real-World Data Regarding Dalbavancin Use before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Dalbavancin is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide, which possesses great potential for bactericidal activity similar to antimicrobials with the same mechanism of action, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin. Due to its very prolonged half-life, it can be used in a single or two-dose regimen to treat infections by Gram-positive microorganisms, even resistant ones, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Currently, it is approved only for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients to whom dalbavancin was administered at the University Hospital of Heraklion and evaluate its use in regard to the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 146 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study evaluating the use of dalbavancin from the first time it was used in 2017 until the end of 2022. The median age was 68 years (range: 21-96 years), and 86 (59%) patients were male. The most common indications for dalbavancin use were osteoarticular infections in 43%, followed by ABSSSIs in 37%, and cardiovascular infections in 10%. Dalbavancin was used empirically in one out of three patients, most commonly with the indication of ABSSSIs, and most commonly in the post-COVID-19 era. The most frequently isolated pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci in 70%, S. aureus in 27%, Enterococcus spp. in 22%, and Streptococcus spp. in 8%, while one out of three infections were polymicrobial. In 12% of patients, the infection was not cured, but no patients died. For patients with ABSSSIs, endocarditis and vascular infections, and bacteremia, the cure rates were more than 90%, and in osteoarticular infections, the cure rate was 76%. Thus, dalbavancin has great potential for use in complicated and invasive infections that may require prolonged intravenous antimicrobial treatment. However, further studies are required to formally investigate its role in such infections.

Dalbavancin in Bone and Joint Infections: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, dalbavancin (DBV) has gradually acquired over the years a role as an off-label treatment for several infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria even in other anatomical sites. Osteoarticular (OA) infections are one of the most difficult-to-treat infections and, since the absence of recommendations, clinicians use different and heterogenic DBV dosing schedule regimens for the off-label treatment of osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, and septic arthritis. Our aim is to systematically review the current literature to describe DBV administration schedules and their outcome in OA infections.

METHODS

According to the 2020 updated PRISMA guidelines, all peer-reviewed articles regarding the use of DBV in OA infections were included. We conducted a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies and 450 patients were included, prevalently male (144/195, 73.8%) and diabetic (53/163, 32.5%). Overall, 280 (280/388, 72.2%) osteomyelitis, 79 (79/388, 20.4%) spondylodiscitis, and 29 (29/388, 7.5%) septic arthritis were considered. Staphylococcus aureus (164/243, 67.5%) was the most common pathogen isolated. A previous treatment failure (45/96, 46.9%) was the main reason for a switch to a long-acting antibiotic. Most patients were successfully cured with DBV (318/401, 79.3%). A source control was performed in most patients with a favourable outcome (80.4%), while MRSA was prevalently isolated in people with an unfavourable outcome (57%). While a higher percentage of success was found in people who received three doses of DBV 1 week apart (92.3%), a higher rate of treatment failure was recorded in cases of when the DBV cycle was composed of less than two or more than four doses (27.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

DBV has shown to be effective as a treatment for OA infections. The most favourable outcome was found in patients receiving three doses of DBV and with an adequate surgical management prior to antibiotic treatment. Although a rigorous administration schedule does not exist, DBV is a viable treatment option in the management of OA infections.

Dalbavancin as suppressive antibiotic therapy in patients with prosthetic infections: efficacy and safety

Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) is a strategy to alleviate symptoms and/or to reduce the progression of an infection when other treatment options cannot be used. Dalbavancin, due to its prolonged half-life, enables (bi) weekly dosing. Here, we report our multicenter real-life clinical experience with dalbavancin used as SAT in patients with prosthetic joint or vascular infections. Medical records of all adult patients with documented vascular or orthopedic chronic prosthetic infections, who received dalbavancin as SAT between 2016 and 2018 from four Spanish hospitals were reviewed for inclusion. Descriptive analysis of demographic characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity index, Barthel index, isolated pathogens and indication, concomitant antibiotic use, adverse events, and clinical outcome of SAT were performed. Eight patients were eligible for inclusion, where six patients had prosthetic vascular infections (aortic valve) and two patients had knee prosthetic joint infections. The most common pathogens were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium. All patients had a history of prior antibiotic treatment for the prosthetic infection [median duration of antibiotic days 125 days (IQR, 28-203 days)]. The median number of dalbavancin doses was 29 (IQR, 9-61) and concomitant antibiotic use (n = 5, 62.5%). Clinical success was reported in 75% (n = 6) of patients. Adverse events were reported in two patients (mild renal and hepatic impairment). The median estimated cost savings due to the avoided hospital days was €60185 (IQR, 19,916-94984) per patient. Despite the limitations of our study, this preliminary data provides valuable insight to support further evaluation of dalbavancin for SAT in patients with prosthetic infections in the outpatient setting when alternative treatments are not feasible.

Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals' experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in pediatric patients: potential role of dalbavancin

INTRODUCTION

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a subtype of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), usually sustained by Gram-positive bacteria, whose incidence is high among children. ABSSSIs are responsible for a considerable number of hospitalizations. Moreover, as multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens become widespread, the pediatric category seems burdened with an increased risk of resistance and treatment failure.

AREAS COVERED

To obtain a view on the status of the field, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological aspects of ABSSSI in children. Old and new treatment options were critically revised with a focus on the pharmacological characteristics of dalbavancin. Evidence on the use of dalbavancin in children was collected, analyzed, and summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

Many of the therapeutic options available at the moment are characterized by the need for hospitalization or repeated intravenous infusions, safety issues, possible drug-drug interactions, and reduced efficacy on MDRs. Dalbavancin, the first long-acting molecule with strong activity against methicillin-resistant and also many vancomycin-resistant pathogens represents a game changer for adult ABSSSI. In pediatric settings, the available literature is still limited, but a growing body of evidence supports dalbavancin use in children with ABSSSI, demonstrating this drug to be safe and highly efficacious.

Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals

Objectives

Thanks to its long half-life, dalbavancin qualifies as an optimal drug for saving costs. We aimed to assess the cost and effectiveness of dalbavancin versus the standard of care (SoC).

Patients and methods

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study, including all hospitalized or outpatients diagnosed with ABSSSIs at Padua University Hospital, Padua and San Paolo Hospital, Milan (1 January 2016 to 31 July 2020). We compared patients according to antibiotic treatment (dalbavancin versus SoC), the number of lines of dalbavancin treatment, and monotherapy or combination (dalbavancin in association with other antibiotics). Primary endpoints were direct medical costs and length of hospital stay (LOS) associated with ABSSSI management; Student's t-test, chi-squared test and one-way ANOVA were used.

Results

One hundred and twenty-six of 228 (55.3%) patients received SoC, while 102/228 (44.7%) received dalbavancin. Twenty-seven of the 102 (26.5%) patients received dalbavancin as first-line treatment, 46 (45.1%) as second-line, and 29 (28.4%) as third- or higher-line treatment. Most patients received dalbavancin as monotherapy (62/102; 60.8%). Compared with SoC, dalbavancin was associated with a significant reduction of LOS (5 ± 7.47 days for dalbavancin, 9.2 ± 5.59 days for SoC; P < 0.00001) and with lower mean direct medical costs (3470 ± 2768€ for dalbavancin; 3493 ± 1901€ for SoC; P = 0.9401). LOS was also reduced for first-line dalbavancin, in comparison with second-, third- or higher-line groups, and for dalbavancin monotherapy versus combination therapy. Mean direct medical costs were significantly lower in first-line dalbavancin compared with higher lines, but no cost difference was observed between monotherapy and combination therapy.

Conclusions

Monotherapy with first-line dalbavancin was confirmed as a promising strategy for ABSSSIs in real-life settings, thanks to its property in reducing LOS and saving direct medical costs.

Cost analysis of disease including treatment with dalbavancin in a Spanish hospital: ECODAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Dalbavancin is an antibiotic with activity against gram-positive bacteria that allows early discharge of patients requiring intravenous therapy. Outpatient treatment helps offset hospitalisation costs associated with standard intravenous treatment. Our objective was to assess the cost of disease management, including treatment with dalbavancin, in a Spanish hospital for 1 year, and the hypothetical costs associated with treatment with other therapeutic alternatives to dalbavancin.

METHODS

A single-centre, observational, retrospective post-hoc analysis was conducted based on electronic medical records analysing all patients who received dalbavancin treatment for 1 year; cost analysis was performed for the whole process. In addition, three scenarios designed on the basis of real clinical practice by clinical experts were hypothesised: (i) individual therapeutic alternative to dalbavancin, (ii) all patients treated with daptomycin, and (iii) all days of dalbavancin as outpatient treatment transformed into hospital stay. Costs were obtained from the hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated with dalbavancin; their mean age was 57.9 years, and 70.6% were men. The main reasons for dalbavancin use were outpatient management (61.7%, n = 21) and ensuring treatment adherence (26.5%, n = 9). The main indications were: osteoarticular infection (32.4%) and infective endocarditis (29.4%). One-half (50%) of the infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus (23.5% were methicillin resistant). All patients achieved clinical resolution, and no costs associated with dalbavancin-associated adverse events or re-admissions were reported. The mean total cost of treatment was 22,738€per patient, with the greatest expenditures in interventions (8,413€) and hospital stay (6,885€). The mean cost of dalbavancin treatment was 3,936€; without dalbavancin, this cost could have been increased to 3,324-11,038€depending on the scenario, mainly due to hospital stays.

MAIN LIMITATION

Limited sample size obtained from a single centre.

CONCLUSION

The economic impact of the management of these infections is high. The cost of dalbavancin is offset by the decreased length of stay.

Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.

Evaluation of Dalbavancin Use on Clinical Outcomes, Cost-Savings, and Adherence at a Large Safety Net Hospital

Dalbavancin is a second-generation lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with activity against Gram-positive organisms. Dalbavancin is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (ABSSTIs). There is a lack of substantial data on dalbavancin in more invasive infections, particularly in high-risk populations (patients with intravenous drug use and unstable living conditions). In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed all patients that received at least one dose of dalbavancin in an inpatient or outpatient setting at Parkland Hospital from February of 2019 to August of 2021. The demographics, type of infection, and rationale for dalbavancin were collected at the baseline. Clinical failure was measured by an avoidance of emergency department (ED) visits or hospital readmission at 30, 60, and 90 days. A separate analysis was conducted to estimate hospital, rehabilitation, or nursing facility days saved based on the projected length of treatment. 40 patients were included, and the majority were uninsured (85%), experiencing homelessness (60%), or had intravenous drug use (IDU) (57.5%). Indications for use included ABSSTIs (45%), bloodstream infection (67.5%), osteomyelitis (40%), infective endocarditis (10%), and septic arthritis (10%). Clinical failure was observed in 5 of the 40 patients (12.5%). Nonadherence to medical recommendations, a lack of source control, and ongoing IDU increased the risk of failure. Dalbavancin saved a total of 566 days of inpatient, rehabilitation, and nursing facility stays. Dalbavancin is a reasonable alternative to the standard of care in an at-risk population, offering decreased lengths of stays and cost savings. The uses of second-generation lipoglycopeptides are desirable alternatives to traditional outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapies for patients who otherwise would not qualify or for patients who desire less hospital contact in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPORTANCE This study contributes additional experience to the literature of dalbavancin use in off-label indications, particularly for patients who do not qualify for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. The majority of the patient population were people who inject drugs and the uninsured. There is difficulty in tracking outcomes in this patient population, given their outpatient follow-up rates; however, we were able to track emergency room visits and readmissions throughout the majority of the local metroplex. The clinical use of dalbavancin at our institution also increased in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to preserve hospital resources and limit health care exposure. In addition, we are able to provide institution-specific cost-saving data with the use of dalbavancin.

Dalbavancin as sequential therapy for infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms: a review

Dalbavancin is a parenteral lipoglycopeptide antibiotic derived from teicoplanin, an analogue of vancomycin. It is mainly used for skin and soft tissue infections. The sustained half-life of approximately 14 days makes dalbavancin a novel option for potential use as sequential treatment in infections such as infective endocarditis, which require prolonged antibiotic courses. However, only a few studies have been reported in the literature, and the use of dalbavancin remains limited. This article is a review of the currently available literature using dalbavancin for the treatment of infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms. Almost all patients received dalbavancin as sequential therapy following standard-of-care antibiotics. The overall clinical efficacy of dalbavancin was approximately 90%, and it appeared to be well tolerated.

Off-Label Use of Dalbavancin for Sequential Treatment of Spondylodiscitis by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Retrospective Single-Centre Experience

Background: Our aim was to describe the clinical outcome and safety of the sequential treatment with off-label dalbavancin in patients with spondylodiscitis that is caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: We retrospectively included all patients >18 years of age with spondylodiscitis that is caused by MRSA that was treated with dalbavancin from January 2018−January 2021, recording the instances of clinical cure/failure, adverse events, and the need to be re-hospitalized after the initiation of dalbavancin. In 2/15 patients, we performed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dalbavancin. Results: We included 15 patients, 53.3% of them were females, with a median age of 67.9 years (57.4−78.5); 100% patients reported back pain, while a fever was present only in 2/15 cases. The spondylodiscitis was localized in 86.6% cases at the lumbar level. A median of a 2-week in-hospital intravenous vancomycin was followed by dalbavancin with a median duration of 12 weeks (12−16). All patients reported a clinical cure, except for a woman who is still on a suppressive treatment. No patient needed to be re-hospitalized, access to emergency department, or experienced adverse events. The TDM for dalbavancin showed that more than 90% of the determinations were above the pharmacodynamic target against staphylococci. Conclusions: The results from our unique, even if it was small, cohort demonstrated that dalbavancin can be a safe/effective option as a sequential treatment in patients with serious infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, such as spondylodiscitis.

Tackling Extended Hospital Stays in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Hospitalisation rates for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) are rising and represent a large pharmacoeconomic burden as treatment may involve an extended number of days of antibiotic therapy. This article first aims to provide a review of treatment challenges associated with ABSSSIs in both hospital and outpatient settings, and shows that while more traditionally treatment has been conducted in a hospital setting, for a number of patients, a variety of considerations, including pharmacoeconomics, infection control, and patient preference, has led to the development of recommendations to assess the eligibility of patients for early discharge from hospital to complete their antibiotic regimen in the outpatient setting. However, such patients require monitoring for drug adherence to oral regimens or complications associated with daily intravenous administration, such as injection site reactions and infection. This review also focuses on one of a number of new antibiotics for ABSSSI, dalbavancin, as the long-acting glycopeptide with the most clinical experience to date. This antibiotic has been shown to be as effective as a daily/twice daily regimen with similar safety profiles. Health economic analysis of dalbavancin is also presented. It has shown that in some, though not all, clinical settings a reduction in the overall treatment cost is evident as, despite a higher medication cost, the lower hospitalisation time can lead to greater cost savings. In conclusion, while the burden of ABSSSI is rising, new treatment options provide additional therapeutic choice, although pharmacoeconomic considerations might limit use in some cases.

Dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure and other infections: a safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Dalbavancin is a second-generation lipoglycopeptide that was approved since 2014 to treat acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSI). Dalbavancin is characterized by Gram-positive activity and novel pharmacokinetic properties that result in a prolonged terminal half-life, allowing once weekly dosing in adults. A good safety profile was reported by randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses.

AREAS COVERED

Dalbavancin safety and tolerability data from trials and post-marketing studies were reviewed. While most trials included predominantly ABSSSI, 2 clinical trials and recent observational studies have explored the use of dalbavancin for off-label indications, mainly including bloodstream and osteoarticular infections.

EXPERT OPINION

The occurrence of drug-related adverse effects (AE) was similar between dalbavancin and comparators in clinical trials enrolling patients with ABSSSI. Most common AE included gastrointestinal symptoms, infusion reaction, and hypersensitivity. Low rates of drug discontinuation and serious AE were reported across studies. In the past 5 years, several observational studies have reported safety data on the use of dalbavancin, confirming its favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, data from dalbavancin off-label use often derived from prolonged (> 2 weeks) treatments with variable dosing regimens, were mainly retrospective, and lacked comparators. Further research is required to allow a reliable analysis of short- and long-term dalbavancin-related AE in non-ABSSSI.

Review of management priorities for invasive infections in people who inject drugs: highlighting the need for patient-centred multidisciplinary care

There has been a global increase in the burden of invasive infections in people who inject drugs (PWID). It is essential that patient-centred multidisciplinary care is provided in the management of these infections to engage PWID in care and deliver evidence-based management and preventive strategies. The multidisciplinary team should include infectious diseases, addictions medicine (inclusive of alcohol and other drug services), surgery, psychiatry, pain specialists, pharmacy, nursing staff, social work and peer support workers (where available) to help address the comorbid conditions that may have contributed to the patient's presentation. PWID have a range of antimicrobial delivery options that can be tailored in a patient-centred manner and thus are not limited to prolonged hospital admissions to receive intravenous antimicrobials for invasive infections. These options include discharge with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, long-acting lipoglycopeptides (dalbavancin and oritavancin) and early oral antimicrobials. Open and respectful discussion with PWID including around harm reduction strategies may decrease the risk of repeat presentations with injecting-related harms.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides

The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.

Dalbavancin in Gram-positive periprosthetic joint infections

OBJECTIVES

The unique properties of dalbavancin (DAL) emphasize the need to explore its clinical benefits to treat periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The present study aimed to compare the treatment outcome of dalbavancin with Standard of Care (SoC) in hip and knee PJIs.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were selected for each group of this study based on our prospectively maintained PJI database. A 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed between patients who received at least two doses of dalbavancin and those who received SoC. Patients were matched based on demographics, joint, patient risk factors, Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, surgical management and type of infection. Treatment outcome was evaluated considering re-infection and re-revision rates, safety and tolerability of dalbavancin after a minimum of 1 year follow-up.

RESULTS

Infection eradication was achieved in 69 (77.5%) and 66 (74.2%) patients of the DAL and SoC groups, respectively. Thirteen (14.6%) patients in the DAL group and 12 (13.5%) patients in the SoC group had an infection-related re-revision. The most prevalent microorganisms among the two groups were Staphylococcus epidermidis (32.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.8%) and Cutibacterium spp. (11.3%). There were significantly less Gram-positive bacteria (P = 0.03) detected in patients who received dalbavancin (17.4%) treatment compared with those treated with SoC (48.0%) in culture-positive re-revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin treatment for Gram-positive PJIs resulted in a similar outcome to SoC, with excellent safety and low rate of adverse effects. Dalbavancin seems to be a promising antimicrobial against PJIs by reducing the risk of Gram-positive re-infections and allowing a less frequent dosage with potential outpatient IV treatment.

Spatial pattern and predictors of malaria in Ethiopia: Application of auto logistics regression

Introduction

Malaria is a severe health threat in the World, mainly in Africa. It is the major cause of health problems in which the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with malaria cases are characterized by spatial variations across the county. This study aimed to investigate the spatial patterns and predictors of malaria distribution in Ethiopia.

Methods

A weighted sample of 15,239 individuals with rapid diagnosis test obtained from the Central Statistical Agency and Ethiopia malaria indicator survey of 2015. Global Moran’s I and Moran scatter plots were used in determining the distribution of malaria cases, whereas the local Moran’s I statistic was used in identifying exposed areas. The auto logistics spatial binary regression model was used to investigate the predictors of malaria.

Results

The final auto logistics regression model was reported that male clients had a positive significant effect on malaria cases as compared to female clients [AOR = 2.401, 95% CI: (2.125–2.713) ]. The distribution of malaria across the regions was different. The highest incidence of malaria was found in Gambela [AOR = 52.55, 95%CI: (40.54–68.12)] followed by Beneshangul [AOR = 34.95, 95%CI: (27.159–44.963)]. Similarly, individuals in Amhara [AOR = 0.243, 95% CI:(0.195–0.303], Oromiya [AOR = 0.197, 955 CI: (0.158–0.244)], Dire Dawa [AOR = 0.064, 95%CI(0.049–0.082)], Addis Ababa[AOR = 0.057,95%CI:(0.044–0.075)], Somali[AOR = 0.077,95%CI:(0.059–0.097)], SNNPR[OR = 0.329, 95%CI: (0.261–0.413)] and Harari [AOR = 0.256, 95%CI:(0.201–0.325)] were less likely to had low incidence of malaria as compared with Tigray. Furthermore, for one meter increase in altitude, the odds of positive rapid diagnostic test (RDT) decreases by 1.6% [AOR = 0.984, 95% CI: (0.984–0.984)]. The use of a shared toilet facility was found as a protective factor for malaria in Ethiopia [AOR = 1.671, 95% CI: (1.504–1.854)]. The spatial autocorrelation variable changes the constant from AOR = 0.471 for logistic regression to AOR = 0.164 for auto logistics regression.

Conclusions

This study found that the incidence of malaria in Ethiopia had a spatial pattern which is associated with socio-economic, demographic, and geographic risk factors. Spatial clustering of malaria cases had occurred in all regions, and the risk of clustering was different across the regions. The risk of malaria was found to be higher for those who live in soil floor-type houses as compared to those who lived in cement or ceramics floor type. Similarly, households with thatched, metal and thin, and other roof-type houses have a higher risk of malaria than ceramics tiles roof houses. Moreover, using a protected anti-mosquito net was reducing the risk of malaria incidence.

A Multicentre, Prospective, and Retrospective Registry to Characterize the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Dalbavancin in German Clinical Practice

The antibiotic dalbavancin is approved for intravenous treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. This study aimed to observe the use, effectiveness, and safety of dalbavancin in clinical practice in Germany. It was a multicentre, prospective, and retrospective registry and consecutively enrolled patients treated with dalbavancin. Each patient was observed from the first to the last dose of dalbavancin, with a 30-day follow-up. Patient inclusion was planned for 2 years, but was terminated early due to low recruitment. All analyses were descriptive. Between November 2018 and December 2019, nine patients were enrolled. Only three patients were treated for the approved indication. Outcome was assessed by the physicians as ‘success’ in five (55.6%) patients, ‘failure’ in one (11.1%) patient, and non-evaluable in three (33.3%) patients. Although the success rate of dalbavancin was lower than reported previously, this may be due to the severity of underlying infections and patients’ high Charlson Comorbidity Index. None of the two reported adverse events were considered related to dalbavancin. These findings were in line with real-world data for dalbavancin from other countries, supporting the drug’s positive benefit–risk profile and suggesting frequent off-label use in German routine practice.

Evaluating the Use of Dalbavancin for Off-Label Indications

(1) Background: Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for skin and soft-tissue infections. Post-marketing experience suggests dalbavancin is being used for off-label indications that normally require long-term intravenous (IV) antibiotics; however, data assessing this off-label usage are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and financial impact of off-label dalbavancin use. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study conducted within a 4-hospital health system. Adult patients who received dalbavancin from January 2018 to January 2021 for an off-label indication were included. The primary outcome was clinical success at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included safety (nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity). A pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed by comparing the cost of dalbavancin to the anticipated cost of patient stay if standard IV therapy was given. (3) Results: Forty-eight patients met study criteria. Indications included osteomyelitis (54%), endocarditis (23%), bacteremia (15%), and prosthetic joint infection (8%). The predominant organism was S. aureus (60%), with 42% caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Overall, 41 (85%) patients achieved clinical success at 90 days, including 85% with osteomyelitis, 82% with endocarditis, and 86% with bacteremia. There were no instances of nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity. Estimated cost avoidance per patient was USD 5313 and USD 1683 if traditional IV therapy would have been completed in the hospital and skilled nursing facility, respectively. (4) Conclusion: Dalbavancin was associated with a relatively high success rate for the treatment of off-label indications and may be a cost-effective alternative to traditional IV antibiotic therapy.

Role of dalbavancin as combination therapy: evidences from the literature and clinical scenarios

INTRODUCTION

The off-label use of dalbavancin in patients with infections other than acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) represents an interesting therapeutic option. Its use as monotherapy or in combination with other antibiotics should be better defined.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to summarize evidence about the potential role of dalbavancin in combination with other antibiotics and describe clinical scenarios in which combination regimens including dalbavancin are useful. The studies were retrieved from PubMed using different combinations of keywords ("dalbavancin", "combination", "synergy").

EXPERT OPINION

Limited data about the use of dalbavancin in monotherapy or combined with other antibiotics are available. In vitro assays showed a synergistic effect of dalbavancin when combined with beta-lactam antibiotics. The use of dalbavancin as combination therapy in patients with ABSSSI did not demonstrate a superiority compared to monotherapy. Conversely, combination regimens including dalbavancin may be useful in specific infection types, such as bone and prosthetic joint infections or subacute/chronic intravascular infections with no possibility of device removal. Potential partner drugs might be rifampin, beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The choice of the companion drug should be tailored on in vitro results of synergistic tests, patient's profile and type of infection.

Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice

Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.

Effectiveness, safety and cost analysis of dalbavancin in clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. However, there is growing evidence that other gram-positive infections could be treated with this antibiotic. A study was undertaken in a tertiary hospital in Spain to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in off-label indications and the potential healthcare cost savings.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study including all patients treated with dalbavancin in our hospital from October 2016 to August 2019 was carried out. Demographic, clinical and safety variables were collected. Effectiveness was assessed using the clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection and the absence of hospital admissions due to the same infection in the following 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included (69.9% men, n=71; median age 72.5 years (range 56.0-84.0)). Treatment was off label in 71 cases (69.6%). The most frequent off-label indications were catheter-related bacteraemia (15.7%, n=16) and endocarditis (13.6%, n=14). All patients had previously received antibiotics. The main reason for switching to dalbavancin was patient discharge (79.4%, n=81). Dalbavancin was administered during hospitalisation in 66.7% of the patients and in the outpatient setting in 13.7%. The median reduction in length of hospital stay was 14 days per patient. A saving of about 4550 Euros per patient was estimated. 89 patients (93.7%) had clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection at the end of the study. One patient did not finish the dalbavancin infusion due to an allergic reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that dalbavancin is a safe and effective alternative to the off-label treatment of gram-positive infections. Its dosage facilitates early discharge and outpatient management of these patients.

Dalbavancin treatment for spondylodiscitis: multi-center clinical experience and literature review

Dalbavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, characterized by a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive cocci. However, its efficacy in spondylodiscitis treatment is not fully established. All adult patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis and treated with dalbavancin were included across four Italian medical centers from January 2018 to April 2021. We collected clinical and laboratory data, and presented follow-up findings along with a thorough literature review. 13 patients (mean age= 65 years) were included in this study. Dalbavancin was administered as first line treatment in six (46%) of the patients. Reasons for using Dalbavancin included treatment simplification (62%) and clinical failure of previous antibiotics (23%). In general, Dalbavancin was well tolerated with minimal adverse events, and clinical success was achieved in 11/13 (85%) of the patients during hospitalization with additional antibiotics required in the remaining two cases. Five months after discharge, no mortality was observed, however, 42% of patients required additional antibiotics for signs of infection on follow-up imaging. Our study suggests that Dalbavancin could be an effective and safe option in treating spondylodiscitis, however, the scarcity of studies on the topic is concerning. Thus, further studies with large samples and long-term follow-up are warranted to compare the efficacy of Dalbavancin with other available treatment options.