Computer-assisted expert case definition in electronic health records

Safety of medicines and vaccines - building next generation capability

The systematic safety surveillance of real-world use of medicinal products and related activities (pharmacovigilance) started in earnest as a scientific field only in the 1960s. While developments have occurred over the past 50 years, adding to its complexity and sophistication, the extent to which some of these advances have positively impacted the capability for ensuring patient safety is questionable. We review how the conduct of safety surveillance has changed, highlight recent scientific advances, and argue how they need to be harnessed to enhance pharmacovigilance in the future. Specifically, we describe five changes that we believe should and will need to happen globally in the coming years: (i) better, more diverse data used for safety; (ii) the switch from manual activities to automation; (iii) removal of limited value, extraneous transactional activities and replacement with sharpened focus on scientific efforts to improve patient safety; (iv) patient-involved and focussed safety; and (v) personalised safety.

Measuring the Effectiveness of Real-World Evidence to Ensure Appropriate Impact

The value of real-world evidence (RWE) in medicines regulation and health technology assessment has been increasingly emphasized. Nevertheless, although RWE is increasingly used, there has been limited systematic evidence of its value. A recent study that examined the role and impact of RWE in regulatory assessments conducted through the European Medicines Agency provided such evidence. Results of the study demonstrated RWE was important to decision making, particularly for certain questions such as the quantification of adverse events, the evaluation of risk minimization measures, and the assessment of product usage. The study suggested, however, that in many of the assessments further RWE would have been valuable and concluded that RWE has, as yet, played a limited role in hypothesis generation and in the assessment of medication effectiveness. This study had been possible only because of the transparency of the European Medicines Agency decision making. Ensuring transparency of RWE evidence collection, study design and conduct, and of decision making based on this evidence will facilitate further development of the uses and value of RWE. Keywords: benefit-risk assessment; medicines regulation; real-world evidence; regulatory decision making.

Association of Race/Ethnicity and Sex With Differences in Health Care Use and Treatment for Acne

Importance

Our understanding of potential racial/ethnic, sex, and other differences in health care use and treatment for acne is limited.

Objective

To identify potential disparities in acne care by evaluating factors associated with health care use and specific treatments for acne.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used the Optum deidentified electronic health record data set to identify patients treated for acne from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2017. Patients had at least 1 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code for acne and at least 1 year of continuous enrollment after the first diagnosis of acne. Data analysis was performed from September 1, 2019, to November 20, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multivariable regression was used to quantify associations between basic patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and the outcomes of health care use and treatment for acne during 1 year of follow-up.

Results

A total of 29 928 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 20.2 [15.4-34.9] years; 19 127 [63.9%] female; 20 310 [67.9%] white) met the inclusion criteria for the study. Compared with non-Hispanic white patients, non-Hispanic black patients were more likely to be seen by a dermatologist (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.31) but received fewer prescriptions for acne medications (incidence rate ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95). Of the acne treatment options, non-Hispanic black patients were more likely to receive prescriptions for topical retinoids (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14-1.38) and topical antibiotics (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.21-1.52) and less likely to receive prescriptions for oral antibiotics (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87), spironolactone (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94), and isotretinoin (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.65) than non-Hispanic white patients. Male patients were more likely to be prescribed isotretinoin than female patients (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.01-2.95). Compared with patients with commercial insurance, those with Medicaid were less likely to see a dermatologist (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.41-0.52) or to be prescribed topical retinoids (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92), oral antibiotics (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97), spironolactone (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.80), and isotretinoin (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings identify racial/ethnic, sex, and insurance-based differences in health care use and prescribing patterns for acne that are independent of other sociodemographic factors and suggest potential disparities in acne care. In particular, the study found underuse of systemic therapies among racial/ethnic minorities and isotretinoin among female patients with acne. Further study is needed to confirm and understand the reasons for these differences.

Age-appropriate cancer screening: A cohort study of adults with psoriasis prescribed biologics, adults in the general population, and adults with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is associated with increased risk of developing and dying from cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether psoriasis patients who are prescribed biologics receive the recommended screening for cervical, breast, and colon cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Optum deidentified Electronic Health Record data set. Incidence rates for cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening were compared between psoriasis patients who were prescribed biologics and 2 matched comparator cohorts: general patient population and patients being managed for hypertension. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess for differences in the rates of cancer screening.

RESULTS

Compared with those in the general population without psoriasis, psoriasis patients who were prescribed biologics had higher screening rates for cervical cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.16) and colon cancer (aHR 1.10; 95% CI 1.02-1.18). Compared with those with hypertension, patients with psoriasis who were prescribed biologics had lower screening rates for breast cancer (aHR 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.94) and colon cancer (aHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Patients with psoriasis who are prescribed biologic therapies may not be receiving adequate age-appropriate cancer screening, especially for breast and colon cancer.

Artificial Intelligence, Real-World Automation and the Safety of Medicines

Despite huge technological advances in the capabilities to capture, store, link and analyse data electronically, there has been some but limited impact on routine pharmacovigilance. We discuss emerging research in the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and automation across the pharmacovigilance lifecycle including pre-licensure. Reasons are provided on why adoption is challenging and we also provide a perspective on changes needed to accelerate adoption, and thereby improve patient safety. Last, we make clear that while technologies could be superimposed on existing pharmacovigilance processes for incremental improvements, these great societal advances in data and technology also provide us with a timely opportunity to reconsider everything we do in pharmacovigilance operations to maximise the benefit of these advances.

Using electronic health records to identify candidates for human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis: An application of super learning to risk prediction when the outcome is rare

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) protects high risk patients from becoming infected with HIV. Clinicians need help to identify candidates for PrEP based on information routinely collected in electronic health records (EHRs). The greatest statistical challenge in developing a risk prediction model is that acquisition is extremely rare.

METHODS

Data consisted of 180 covariates (demographic, diagnoses, treatments, prescriptions) extracted from records on 399 385 patient (150 cases) seen at Atrius Health (2007-2015), a clinical network in Massachusetts. Super learner is an ensemble machine learning algorithm that uses k-fold cross validation to evaluate and combine predictions from a collection of algorithms. We trained 42 variants of sophisticated algorithms, using different sampling schemes that more evenly balanced the ratio of cases to controls. We compared super learner's cross validated area under the receiver operating curve (cv-AUC) with that of each individual algorithm.

RESULTS

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) using a 1:20 class ratio outperformed the super learner (cv-AUC = 0.86 vs 0.84). A traditional logistic regression model restricted to 23 clinician-selected main terms was slightly inferior (cv-AUC = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning was successful at developing a model to predict 1-year risk of acquiring HIV based on a physician-curated set of predictors extracted from EHRs.

The clinical utility of laboratory monitoring during isotretinoin therapy for acne and changes to monitoring practices over time

BACKGROUND

As a result of concerns about hypertriglyceridemia, liver enzyme abnormalities, and leukopenia during isotretinoin therapy for acne, patients are often monitored closely with routine laboratory assessments, although the value of this practice has been questioned.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of patients receiving isotretinoin for acne between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2017, using the OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database (Optum, Eden Prairie, MN) to evaluate the frequency of laboratory abnormalities. Poisson regression was used to evaluate for changes to the frequency of routine laboratory monitoring over time.

RESULTS

Among 1863 patients treated with isotretinoin, grade 3 or greater triglyceride and liver function testing abnormalities were noted in fewer than 1% and 0.5% of patients screened, respectively. No grade 3 or greater cholesterol or complete blood count abnormalities were observed. There were no meaningful changes in the frequency of laboratory monitoring over time.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include that we are unable to evaluate the clinical notes to understand the exact clinical decision making when clinicians encountered abnormal laboratory values.

CONCLUSION

Although laboratory abnormalities are rare and often do not influence management, frequent laboratory monitoring remains a common practice. There are opportunities to improve the quality of care among patients being treated with isotretinoin for acne by reducing the frequency of lipid and liver function monitoring and by eliminating complete blood count monitoring.

Challenges and Opportunities for Using Big Health Care Data to Advance Medical Science and Public Health

Methodological advancements in epidemiology, biostatistics, and data science have strengthened the research world's ability to use data captured from electronic health records (EHRs) to address pressing medical questions, but gaps remain. We describe methods investments that are needed to curate EHR data toward research quality and to integrate complementary data sources when EHR data alone are insufficient for research goals. We highlight new methods and directions for improving the integrity of medical evidence generated from pragmatic trials, observational studies, and predictive modeling. We also discuss needed methods contributions to further ease data sharing across multisite EHR data networks. Throughout, we identify opportunities for training and for bolstering collaboration among subject matter experts, methodologists, practicing clinicians, and health system leaders to help ensure that methods problems are identified and resulting advances are translated into mainstream research practice more quickly.

From Big Data to Smart Data for Pharmacovigilance: The Role of Healthcare Databases and Other Emerging Sources

In the last decade 'big data' has become a buzzword used in several industrial sectors, including but not limited to telephony, finance and healthcare. Despite its popularity, it is not always clear what big data refers to exactly. Big data has become a very popular topic in healthcare, where the term primarily refers to the vast and growing volumes of computerized medical information available in the form of electronic health records, administrative or health claims data, disease and drug monitoring registries and so on. This kind of data is generally collected routinely during administrative processes and clinical practice by different healthcare professionals: from doctors recording their patients' medical history, drug prescriptions or medical claims to pharmacists registering dispensed prescriptions. For a long time, this data accumulated without its value being fully recognized and leveraged. Today big data has an important place in healthcare, including in pharmacovigilance. The expanding role of big data in pharmacovigilance includes signal detection, substantiation and validation of drug or vaccine safety signals, and increasingly new sources of information such as social media are also being considered. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the uses of big data for drug safety post-marketing assessment.

Clinical Informatics Researcher's Desiderata for the Data Content of the Next Generation Electronic Health Record

OBJECTIVE

Clinical informatics researchers depend on the availability of high-quality data from the electronic health record (EHR) to design and implement new methods and systems for clinical practice and research. However, these data are frequently unavailable or present in a format that requires substantial revision. This article reports the results of a review of informatics literature published from 2010 to 2016 that addresses these issues by identifying categories of data content that might be included or revised in the EHR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used an iterative review process on 1,215 biomedical informatics research articles. We placed them into generic categories, reviewed and refined the categories, and then assigned additional articles, for a total of three iterations.

RESULTS

Our process identified eight categories of data content issues: Adverse Events, Clinician Cognitive Processes, Data Standards Creation and Data Communication, Genomics, Medication List Data Capture, Patient Preferences, Patient-reported Data, and Phenotyping.

DISCUSSION

These categories summarize discussions in biomedical informatics literature that concern data content issues restricting clinical informatics research. These barriers to research result from data that are either absent from the EHR or are inadequate (e.g., in narrative text form) for the downstream applications of the data. In light of these categories, we discuss changes to EHR data storage that should be considered in the redesign of EHRs, to promote continued innovation in clinical informatics.

CONCLUSION

Based on published literature of clinical informaticians' reuse of EHR data, we characterize eight types of data content that, if included in the next generation of EHRs, would find immediate application in advanced informatics tools and techniques.

Tacit knowledge

Information that is not made explicit is nonetheless embedded in most of our standard procedures. In its simplest form, embedded information may take the form of prior knowledge held by the researcher and presumed to be agreed to by consumers of the research product. More interesting are the settings in which the prior information is held unconsciously by both researcher and reader, or when the very form of an "effective procedure" incorporates its creator's (unspoken) understanding of a problem. While it may not be productive to exhaustively detail the embedded or tacit knowledge that manifests itself in creative scientific work, at least at the beginning, we may want to routinize methods for extracting and documenting the ways of thinking that make "experts" expert. We should not back away from both expecting and respecting the tacit knowledge the pervades our work and the work of others.

A tamper-proof audit and control system for the doctor in the loop

The “doctor in the loop” is a new paradigm in information-driven medicine, picturing the doctor as authority inside a loop supplying an expert system with information on actual patients, treatment results, and possible additional (side-)effects, including general information in order to enhance data-driven medical science, as well as giving back treatment advice to the doctor himself. While this approach can be very beneficial for new medical approaches like P4 medicine (personal, predictive, preventive, and participatory), it also relies heavily on the authenticity of the data and thus increases the need for secure and reliable databases. In this paper, we propose a solution in order to protect the doctor in the loop against responsibility derived from manipulated data, thus enabling this new paradigm to gain acceptance in the medical community. This work is an extension of the conference paper  Kieseberg et al. (Brain Informatics and Health, 2015), which includes extensions to the original concept.

Opportunities and challenges in leveraging electronic health record data in oncology

The widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and the growing wealth of digitized information sources about patients is ushering in an era of 'Big Data' that may revolutionize clinical research in oncology. Research will likely be more efficient and potentially more accurate than the current gold standard of manual chart review studies. However, EHRs as they exist today have significant limitations: important data elements are missing or are only captured in free text or PDF documents. Using two case studies, we illustrate the challenges of leveraging the data that are routinely collected by the healthcare system in EHRs (e.g., real-world data), specific challenges encountered in the cancer domain and opportunities that can be achieved when these are overcome.