Changing the electronic request form proves to be an effective tool for optimizing laboratory test utilization in the emergency department

Causes of Inappropriate Laboratory Test Ordering from the Perspective of Medical Laboratory Technical Professionals: Implications for Research and Education

OBJECTIVE

Inappropriate laboratory test ordering is a significant and persistent problem. Many causes have been identified and studied. Medical laboratory professionals (MLPs) are technical staff within clinical laboratories who are uniquely positioned to comment on why inappropriate ordering occurs. We aimed to characterize existing MLP perceptions in this domain to reveal new or underemphasized interventional targets.

METHODS

We developed and disseminated a self-administered survey to MLPs in Canada, including open-ended responses to questions about the causes of inappropriate laboratory test ordering.

RESULTS

Four primary themes were identified from qualitative analysis: ordering-provider factors, communication factors, existing test-ordering processes, and patient factors. Although these factors can largely be found in previous literature, some are under-studied.

CONCLUSION

MLP insights into nonphysician triage ordering and poor result communication provide targets for further investigation. A heavy focus on individual clinician factors suggests that current understandings and interprofessional skills in the MLP population can be improved.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Laboratory Test Utilization at a Pediatric Medical Center

Background

The epidemiology and clinical manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pediatric population is different from the adult population. The purpose of this study is to identify effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on laboratory test utilization in a pediatric hospital.

Methods

We performed retrospective analysis on test utilization data from Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, an academic pediatric medical center. Data between two 100-day periods prior to (prepandemic) and during the pandemic (mid-pandemic) were analyzed to evaluate changes in test volume, lab utilization, and test positivity rate. We also evaluated these metrics based on in- vs outpatient testing and performed modeling to determine what variables significantly impact the test positivity rate.

Results

During the pandemic period, there was an expected surge in COVID-19 testing, while over 84% of lab tests studied decreased in ordering volume. The average number of tests ordered per patient was not significantly different during the pandemic for any of the laboratories (adjusted P value > 0.05). Thirty-three studied tests showed significant change in positivity rate during the pandemic. Linear modeling revealed test volume and inpatient status as the key variables associated with change in test positivity rate.

Conclusions

Excluding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 tests, the COVID-19 pandemic has generally led to decreased test ordering volume and laboratory utilization. However, at this pediatric hospital, the average number of tests performed per patient and test positivity rates were comparable between pre- and mid-pandemic periods. These results suggest that, overall, clinical test utilization at this site remained consistent during the pandemic.

'Diagnostic downshift': clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care

Numerous drivers push specialist diagnostic approaches down to primary care ('diagnostic downshift'), intuitively welcomed by clinicians and patients. However, primary care's different population and processes result in under-recognised, unintended consequences. Testing performs poorer in primary care, with indication creep due to earlier, more undifferentiated presentation and reduced accuracy due to spectrum bias and the 'false-positive paradox'. In low-prevalence settings, tests without near-100% specificity have their useful yield eclipsed by greater incidental or false-positive findings. Ensuing cascades and multiplier effects can generate clinician workload, patient anxiety, further low-value tests, referrals, treatments and a potentially nocebic population 'disease' burden of unclear benefit. Increased diagnostics earlier in pathways can burden patients and stretch general practice (GP) workloads, inducing downstream service utilisation and unintended 'market failure' effects. Evidence is tenuous for reducing secondary care referrals, providing patient reassurance or meaningfully improving clinical outcomes. Subsequently, inflated investment in per capita testing, at a lower level in a healthcare system, may deliver diminishing or even negative economic returns. Test cost poorly represents 'value', neglecting under-recognised downstream consequences, which must be balanced against therapeutic yield. With lower positive predictive values, more tests are required per true diagnosis and cost-effectiveness is rarely robust. With fixed secondary care capacity, novel primary care testing is an added cost pressure, rarely reducing hospital activity. GP testing strategies require real-world evaluation, in primary care populations, of all downstream consequences. Test formularies should be scrutinised in view of the setting of care, with interventions to focus rational testing towards those with higher pretest probabilities, while improving interpretation and communication of results.

Specific test panels for patients with heart failure: implementation and use in the Spanish National Health System

Objectives

The use of specific test panels (STP) for heart failure (HF) could help improve the management of this condition. The purpose of this study is to gain an insight into the level of implementation of STPs in the management of HF in Spain and gather the opinions of experts, with a special focus on parameters related to iron metabolism.

Methods

The opinions of experts in HF were gathered in three stages STAGE 1 as follows: level of implementation of STPs (n=40). STAGE 2: advantages and disadvantages of STPs (n=12). STAGE 3: level of agreement with the composition of three specific STPs for HF: initial evaluation panel, monitoring panel, and de novo panel (n=16).

Results

In total, 62.5% of hospitals used STPs for the clinical management of HF, with no association found between the use of STPs and the level of health care (p=0.132) and location of the center (p=0.486) or the availability of a Heart Failure Unit in the center (p=0.737). According to experts, the use of STPs in clinical practice has more advantages than disadvantages (8 vs. 3), with a notable positive impact on diagnostics. Experts gave three motivations and found three limitations to the implementation of STPs. The composition of the three specific STPs for HF was viewed positively by experts.

Conclusions

Although the experts interviewed advocate the use of diagnostic and monitoring STPs for HF, efforts are still necessary to achieve the standardization and homogenization of test panels for HF in Spanish hospitals.

Manchester Triage System: assessment in an emergency hospital service

OBJECTIVES

to analyze demographic data, clinical profile and outcomes of patients in emergency services according to Manchester Triage System's priority level.

METHODS

a cross-sectional, analytical study, carried out with 3,624 medical records. For statistical analysis, the Chi-Square Test was used.

RESULTS

white individuals were more advanced in age. In the red and white categories, there was a higher percentage of men when compared to women (p=0.0018) and higher prevalence of personal history. Yellow priority patients had higher percentage of pain (p<0.0001). Those in red category had a higher frequency of altered vital signs, external causes, and death outcome. There was a higher percentage of exams performed and hospitalization in the orange category. Blue priority patients had a higher percentage of non-specific complaints and dismissal after risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

a higher percentage of altered vital signs, number of tests performed, hospitalization and death were evidenced in Manchester protocol's high priority categories.

A systematic literature review on unnecessary diagnostic testing: The role of ICT use

BACKGROUND

The negative impact of unnecessary diagnostic tests on healthcare systems and patients has been widely recognized. Medical researchers in various countries have been devoting effort to reduce unnecessary diagnostic tests by using different types of interventions, including information and communications technology-based (ICT-based) intervention, educational intervention, audit and feedback, the introduction of guidelines or protocols, and the reward and punishment of staff. We conducted a review of ICT based interventions and a comparative analysis of their relative effectiveness in reducing unnecessary tests.

METHOD

A systematic Boolean search in PubMed, EMBase and EBSCOhost research databases was performed. Keyword search and citation analysis were also conducted. Empirical studies reporting ICT based interventions, and their implications on relative effectiveness in reducing unnecessary diagnostic tests (pathology tests or medical imaging) were evaluated independently by two reviewers based on a rigorously developed coding protocol.

RESULTS

92 research articles from peer-reviewed journals were identified as eligible. 47 studies involved a single-method intervention and 45 involved multi-method interventions. Regardless of the number of interventions involved in the studies, ICT-based interventions were utilized by 71 studies and 59 of them were shown to be effective in reducing unnecessary testing. A clinical decision support (CDS) tool appeared to be the most adopted ICT approach, with 46 out of 71 studies using CDS tools. The CDS tool showed effectiveness in reducing test volume in 38 studies and reducing cost in 24 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review investigated five frequently utilized intervention methods, ICT-based, education, introduction of guidelines or protocols, audit and feedback, and reward and punishment. It provides in-depth analysis of the efficacy of different types of interventions and sheds insights about the benefits of ICT based interventions, especially those utilising CDS tools, to reduce unnecessary diagnostic testing. The replicability of the studies is limited due to the heterogeneity of the studies in terms of context, study design, and targeted types of tests.

A compulsory pop-up form reduces the number of vitamin D requests from general practitioners by 25 percent

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare costs, including costs for laboratory tests, are increasing worldwide. One example is the measurement of vitamin D. General practitioners in the Capital Region of Denmark include a vitamin D status in approximately 20% of all laboratory requisitions. This study intended to examine the effect of a compulsory pop-up form in the electronic request system on the number of vitamin D tests and to monitor the indications.

DESIGN

From 1 January 2017, we introduced a compulsory pop-up form in which the general practitioners had to state the indication for measuring vitamin D, choosing from a predefined set of indications. Intervention practitioners were compared with control practitioners before and after the intervention.

SETTING

General practices in the Capital Region of Denmark.

SUBJECTS

In total, 572 general practitioners and 383,964 patients were included in the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of vitamin D tests and distribution of indications.

RESULTS

We observed a drop in number of vitamin D requisitions to 70% (in 2017) and 75% (in 2018) relative to 2016. During the same period, the number of requisitions increased by 33% in a non-intervention group of practitioners. The indication 'Monitoring of treatment with vitamin D' was the most frequently used indication, recorded in 121,475 patients.

CONCLUSION

A compulsory pop-up form reduces the number of vitamin D requests from general practitioners by 25%. The implication is that pop-up forms can be used to decrease healthcare costs.

The effect of laboratory requisition modification, audit and feedback with academic detailing or both on utilization of blood urea testing in family practice in Newfoundland, Canada

OBJECTIVES

Measuring blood urea at the same time as serum creatinine in stable ambulatory patients in family practice is largely unnecessary. The objective was to assess the relative impact of changing the laboratory requisition versus audit and feedback and academic detailing on the volume of orders for blood urea.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A natural experiment was observed over the period April 2015 to March 2018 in the Canadian province of Newfoundland where three health regions had different approaches to trying to reduce such urea testing. The Eastern and Western regions removed urea from the standard laboratory requisition but the test could still be ordered by writing it on the requisition. Central region requisitions continued to list urea. Audit and feedback was undertaken with family doctors in Eastern region after the requisition change and that was followed by academic detailing. A nephrologist gave presentations to groups of family doctors on one occasion in Central region.

RESULTS

The volume of serum creatinine testing was largely unchanged over time in each region. The volume of urea testing reduced by 73%, 48% and 28% in Eastern, Western and central regions. Interrupted time series analysis showed significant changes in test volume after requisition change in Eastern and Western regions as well as after audit and feedback in Eastern and the presentations in Central region. The incremental impact of academic detailing was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that removing urea from standard test order menus was the most effective in reducing test volumes, but combination with audit and feedback augmented the impact.

Utility of calcium, magnesium and phosphate testing in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To determine how frequently calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and phosphate (PO₄ ) tests change ED patient management.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective observational study in an Australian tertiary referral ED. We enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who presented between 1 January and 30 June 2017 and who had a serum Ca, Mg or PO₄ test ordered and completed during their ED stay. Patient symptoms, medical history, electrolyte levels and ED management changes were extracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Of the 33 120 adults presented during the study period, 1716 (5.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-5.4) had at least one Ca, Mg or PO₄ test completed in the ED. This included 4776 individual electrolyte tests, of which 776 (16.2%, 95% CI 15.2-17.3) were abnormal. Fifty-six (7.2% [95% CI 5.5-9.3] of patients with abnormal tests, 1.2% [95% CI 0.9-1.5] of all tests) tests were associated with a change in ED management. Twenty-six out of 1683 (1.5%) Ca levels were low with six (23.1%) management changes; 203 (12.1%) were high with 10 (4.9%) management changes. One hundred and twenty-eight out of 1579 (8.1%) Mg levels were low with 33 (25.8%) management changes; 30 (1.9%) were high with no management changes. Two hundred and twenty-five out of 1514 (14.9%) PO₄ levels were low with six (2.7%) management changes; 164 (10.8%) were high with one (0.6%) management change. Fifty (2.9%) patients had management changes despite normal electrolyte levels.

CONCLUSION

Ca, Mg and PO₄ testing is common. However, the yield of clinically significant abnormal levels is low and patient management is rarely changed. Testing of these electrolytes needs to be rationalised.

Change in HbA1c concentration as decision parameter for frequency of HbA1c measurement

Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) is a long-term measure for glucose concentration in plasma. Since its introduction as a diabetes monitoring tool, and its more recent application as a diagnostic tool, the number of measurements of HbA_1c have risen dramatically. However, HbA_1c change is slow, so repeating measurements should not be done too often. We use a large, unfiltered dataset from 52,017 patients to determine the possible rate of change in HbA_1c concentration. In our laboratory, the critical difference between HbA_1c measurements is 8.5%. Our data show that a 1-unit HbA_1c rise takes 4 weeks to occur, hence, at a HbA_1c concentration around 50 mmol/mol Hgb, a critically increased HbA_1c concentration cannot be determined until after 16 weeks. Conversely a critically lower HbA1c can manifest itself after 2 weeks, but after 7 weeks the dropping tendency stops. The amount of measurements that can be cancelled because they were taken sooner than 16 weeks is 23 percent.