Biological cost of fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli in a murine model of urinary tract infection

Individual health insurance data of antibiotic delivery in previous months as a tool to predict bacterial resistance of urinary tract infection: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to quantify the individual risk of antimicrobial resistance among patients with community-acquired Escherichia coli urinary tract infection (UTI) according to their antibiotic exposure over the previous 18 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

French patients were prospectively recruited in two centers in 2015-2017. Resistance of isolates to amoxicillin (AMX), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), fluoroquinolones (FQ) and fosfomycin (FOS) was analysed according to previous intra-class and inter-class antibiotic exposure documented in health insurance files.

RESULTS

Previous antibiotic exposure was found in 588 (81.4 %) of the 722 UTI cases analysed (564 patients). Recent exposure (three months before UTI) was associated with stronger intra-class impact on E. coli resistance compared to remote exposure (18 months before UTI) for AMX, AMC, FQ and TMP-SMX, with respective adjusted odds ratios [95 % confidence interval] of 1.63 [1.20-2.21], 1.59 [1.02-2.48], 3.01 [1.90-4.77], and 2.60 [1.75-3.87]. AMX, FQ, and TMP-SMX also showed significant inter-class impact. Resistance to 3GC was not significantly associated with intraclass exposure (adjusted OR: 0.88 [0.41-1.90]). FOS resistance was remarkably low (0.4 %). Duration of the antibiotic-free period required for resistance risk to drop below 10 %, the threshold for empirical use in UTI, was modelled as < 1 month for 3GC, >18 months for AMX and TMP-SMX and uncertain for AMC (5.2 months [2.3 to > 18]) and FQ (17.4 months [7.4 to > 18]).

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance of E. coli causing UTI is partially predicted by previous personal antibiotic delivery.

Variability in cell division among anatomical sites shapes Escherichia coli antibiotic survival in a urinary tract infection mouse model

Urinary tract infection (UTI), mainly caused by Escherichia coli, are frequent and have a recurrent nature even after antibiotic treatment. Potential bacterial escape mechanisms include growth defects, but probing bacterial division in vivo and establishing its relation to the antibiotic response remain challenging. Using a synthetic reporter of cell division, we follow the temporal dynamics of cell division for different E. coli clinical strains in a UTI mouse model with and without antibiotics. We show that more bacteria are actively dividing in the kidneys and urine compared with the bladder. Bacteria that survive antibiotic treatment are consistently non-dividing in three sites of infection. Additionally, we demonstrate how both the strain in vitro persistence profile and the microenvironment impact infection and treatment dynamics. Understanding the relative contribution of the host environment, growth heterogeneity, non-dividing bacteria, and antibiotic persistence is crucial to improve therapies for recurrent infections.

Raising the alarm: fosfomycin resistance associated with non-susceptible inner colonies imparts no fitness cost to the primary bacterial uropathogen

IMPORTANCE

While fosfomycin resistance is rare, the observation of non-susceptible subpopulations among clinical Escherichia coli isolates is a common phenomenon during antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in American and European clinical labs. Previous evidence suggests that mutations eliciting this phenotype are of high biological cost to the pathogen during infection, leading to current recommendations of neglecting non-susceptible colonies during AST. Here, we report that the most common route to fosfomycin resistance, as well as novel routes described in this work, does not impair virulence in uropathogenic E. coli, the major cause of urinary tract infections, suggesting a re-evaluation of current susceptibility guidelines is warranted.

Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

The optimal therapy for severe infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) remains unclear, but the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin may be a good choice. The 24-h static-concentration time-kill study (SCTK) was used to preliminarily explore the pharmacodynamics of linezolid combined with fosfomycin against three clinical isolates. Subsequently, a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was used for the first time to further investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of the co-administration regimen against selected isolates over 72 h. To further quantify the relationship between fosfomycin resistance and bacterial virulence in VREfm, the Galleria mellonella infection model and virulence genes expression experiments were also performed. The results of SCTK showed that the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin had additive effect on all strains. In the HFIM, the dosage regimen of linezolid (12 mg/L, steady-state concentration) combined with fosfomycin (8 g administered intravenously every 8 h as a 1 h infusion) not only produced a sustained bactericidal effect of 3∼4 log₁₀ CFU/mL over 72 h, but also completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. The expression of virulence genes was down-regulated to at least 0.222-fold in fosfomycin-resistant strains compared with baseline isolate, while survival rates of G. mellonella was increased (G. mellonella survival ≥45% at 72 h). For severe infections caused by VREfm, neither linezolid nor fosfomycin monotherapy regimens inhibited amplification of the resistant subpopulations, and the development of fosfomycin resistance was at the expense of the virulence of VREfm. The combination of linezolid with fosfomycin produced a sustained bactericidal effect and completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. Linezolid plus Fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of severe infections caused by VREfm.

Activity of the combination of colistin and fosfomycin against NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli with variable levels of susceptibility to colistin and fosfomycin in a murine model of peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Alternative treatments are needed against NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli. Colistin (COL) and fosfomycin (FOS) often remain active in vitro but selection of resistant mutants is frequent if used separately. We determined whether the combination of colistin and fosfomycin may be useful to treat infections with NDM-1-producing E. coli with varying levels of resistance.

METHODS

Isogenic derivatives of E. coli CFT073 with blaNDM-1 and variable levels of resistance to colistin and fosfomycin (CFT073-NDM1, CFT073-NDM1-COL and CFT073-NDM1-FOS, respectively) were used. The combination (colistin + fosfomycin) was tested in vitro and in a fatal peritonitis murine model. Mortality and bacterial loads were determined and resistant mutants detected.

RESULTS

Colistin MICs were 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L and fosfomycin MICs were 1, 1 and 32 mg/L against CFT073-NDM1, CFT073-NDM1-COL and CFT073-NDM1-FOS, respectively. In time-kill curves, combining colistin with fosfomycin was synergistic and bactericidal against CFT073-NDM1 and CFT073-NDM1-FOS, with concentrations of 4× MIC (for both drugs), but not against CFT073-NDM1-COL (concentrations of colistin = 0.5× MIC), due to regrowth with fosfomycin-resistant mutants. Mice died less and bacterial counts were lower in spleen with the combination compared with monotherapy against all strains; the combination prevented selection of resistant mutants except for CFT073-NDM1-COL where fosfomycin-resistant mutants were found in all mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining colistin and fosfomycin was beneficial in vitro and in vivo against NDM-1-producing E. coli, even with strains less susceptible to colistin and fosfomycin. However, the combination failed to prevent the emergence of fosfomycin-resistant mutants against colistin-resistant strains. Combining colistin and fosfomycin constitutes an alternative for treatment of NDM-1 E. coli, except against colistin-resistant strains.

Novel Chromosomal Mutations Responsible for Fosfomycin Resistance in Escherichia coli

Fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli results from chromosomal mutations or acquisition of plasmid-mediated genes. Because these mechanisms may be absent in some resistant isolates, we aimed at decipher the genetic basis of fosfomycin resistance in E. coli. Different groups of isolates were studied: fosfomycin-resistant mutants selected in vitro from E. coli CFT073 (MIC = 1 mg/L) and two groups (wildtype and non-wildtype) of E. coli clinical isolates. Single-nucleotide allelic replacement was performed to confirm the implication of novel mutations into resistance. Induction of uhpT expression by glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) was assessed by RT-qPCR. The genome of all clinical isolates was sequenced by MiSeq (Illumina). Two first-step mutants were obtained in vitro from CFT073 (MICs, 128 mg/L) with single mutations: G469R in uhpB (M3); F384L in uhpC (M4). Second-step mutants (MICs, 256 mg/L) presented additional mutations: R282V in galU (M7 from M3); Q558^∗ in lon (M8 from M4). Introduction of uhpB or uhpC mutations by site-directed mutagenesis conferred a 128-fold increase in fosfomycin MICs, whereas single mutations in galU or lon were only responsible for a 2-fold increase. Also, these mutations abolished the induction of uhpT expression by G6P. All 14 fosfomycin-susceptible clinical isolates (MICs, 0.5-8 mg/L) were devoid of any mutation. At least one genetic change was detected in all but one fosfomycin-resistant clinical isolates (MICs, 32 - >256 mg/L) including 8, 17, 18, 5, and 8 in uhpA, uhpB, uhpC, uhpT, and glpT genes, respectively. In conclusion, novel mutations in uhpB and uhpC are associated with fosfomycin resistance in E. coli clinical isolates.

Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The increasing incidence of fluoroquinolones (FQ) resistance may lower its efficacy in preventing UTI following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FQ and fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) in patients undergoing TRUS-PB.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted between April 2017 and June 2019 and enrolled men undergoing TRUS-PB and receiving a single-dose of FQ (FQ-arm) or FT (FT-arm) for UTI prophylaxis per physician's choice. The primary efficacy endpoint was self-reported TRUS-PB UTI. We assessed baseline factors associated with UTI with logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 222 men were enrolled, 141/222 (64%) received FQ, and 81/222 (36%) FT. The median age was 67.6 years [IQR, 61.4-72.1] and the Charlson score was 3 [IQR, 3-5]. The overall incidence of self-reported TRUS-PB UTI was 12% (24/197, (95%CI, 8%-17%)): 15% (17/116, (95% CI, 10%-17%)) in FQ-arm, versus 9% (7/81, 95% CI (5%-13%)) in FT-arm (RR = 0.55 (95% CI, 0.22-1.40), p-value = 0.209). No baseline characteristic was significantly associated with TRUS-PB UTI. Safety was similar between the arms: the rate of the reported adverse event was 31% (36/116, (95% CI, 25%-37%) in the FQ-arm versus 36% (28/81, (95% CI, 28%-41%)) in the FT-arm (RR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.64-2.15), p = 0.602).

CONCLUSIONS

TRUS-PB UTI prophylaxis with FT and FQ has similar efficacy and safety. A randomized comparison of these two antibiotics is warranted.

Fosfomycin for Injection (ZTI-01) Versus Piperacillin-tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Acute Pyelonephritis: ZEUS, A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is an epoxide antibiotic with a differentiated mechanism of action (MOA) inhibiting an early step in bacterial cell wall synthesis. ZTI-01 has broad in vitro spectrum of activity, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and is being developed for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP) in the United States.

METHODS

Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/AP were randomized 1:1 to 6 g ZTI-01 q8h or 4.5 g intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) q8h for a fixed 7-day course (no oral switch); patients with concomitant bacteremia could receive up to 14 days.

RESULTS

Of 465 randomized patients, 233 and 231 were treated with ZTI-01 and PIP-TAZ, respectively. In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population, ZTI-01 met the primary objective of noninferiority compared with PIP-TAZ with overall success rates of 64.7% (119/184 patients) vs 54.5% (97/178 patients), respectively; treatment difference was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4, 20.8). Clinical cure rates at test of cure (TOC, day 19-21) were high and similar between treatments (90.8% [167/184] vs 91.6% [163/178], respectively). In post hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates at TOC in m-MITT were 69.0% (127/184) for ZTI-01 versus 57.3% (102/178) for PIP-TAZ (difference 11.7% 95% CI: 1.3, 22.1). ZTI-01 was well tolerated. Most treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypokalemia and elevated serum aminotransferases, were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

ZTI-01 was effective for treatment of cUTI including AP and offers a new IV therapeutic option with a differentiated MOA for patients with serious Gram-negative infections.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02753946.

Susceptibility of ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin in the Netherlands and comparison of several testing methods including Etest, MIC test strip, Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion

Objectives

Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated and prone to error. Before using fosfomycin widely in patients with serious infections, acquisition of WT distribution data and reliable susceptibility testing methods are crucial. In this study, the performance of five methods for fosfomycin testing in the routine laboratory against the reference method was evaluated.

Methods

Ten laboratories collected up to 100 ESBL-producing isolates each (80 Escherichia coli and 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae). Isolates were tested using Etest, MIC test strip (MTS), Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion. Agar dilution was performed as the reference method in a central laboratory. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) were determined for each species and susceptibility and error rates were calculated.

Results

In total, 775 E. coli and 201 K. pneumoniae isolates were tested by agar dilution. The ECOFF was 2 mg/L for E. coli and 64 mg/L for K. pneumoniae. Susceptibility rates based on the EUCAST breakpoint of ≤32 mg/L were 95.9% for E. coli and 87.6% for K. pneumoniae. Despite high categorical agreement rates for all methods, notably in E. coli, none of the alternative antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods performed satisfactorily. Due to poor detection of resistant isolates, very high error rates of 23.3% (Etest), 18.5% (MTS), 18.8% (Vitek2), 12.5% (Phoenix) and 12.9% (disc diffusion) for E. coli and 22.7% (Etest and MTS), 16.0% (Vitek2) and 12% (Phoenix) for K. pneumoniae were found. None of the methods adequately differentiated between WT and non-WT populations.

Conclusions

Overall, it was concluded that none of the test methods is suitable as an alternative to agar dilution in the routine laboratory.

Activity of fosfomycin alone or combined with temocillin in vitro and in a murine model of peritonitis due to KPC-3- or OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli

Background

Alternative therapeutic regimens are urgently needed against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Fosfomycin often remains active against KPC and OXA-48 producers, but emergence of resistance is a major limitation. Our aim was to determine whether the association of temocillin with fosfomycin might be useful to treat KPC- or OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli infections.

Methods

Isogenic derivatives of E. coli CFT073 with blaKPC-3- or blaOXA-48-harbouring plasmids (named CFT073-KPC-3 and CFT073-OXA-48, respectively) were used. The addition of temocillin to fosfomycin was tested using the chequerboard method and time-kill curves as well as in a fatal peritonitis murine model. Mice were treated for 24 h with fosfomycin alone or in combination with temocillin. Bacterial loads, before and after treatment, were determined in the peritoneal fluid and fosfomycin-resistant mutants were detected.

Results

Temocillin MICs were 8, 32 and 256 mg/L for CFT073 (WT), CFT073-KPC-3 and CFT073-OXA-48, respectively. Fosfomycin MIC was 0.5 mg/L for all strains. The chequerboard experiments demonstrated synergy for all three strains. In time-kill curves, combining temocillin with fosfomycin was synergistic, bactericidal and prevented emergence of resistance for CFT073-pTOPO and CFT073-KPC-3, but not CFT073-OXA-48. In vivo, for the three strains, bacterial counts were lower in peritoneal fluid with the combination compared with fosfomycin alone (P < 0.001) and inhibited growth of resistant mutants in all cases.

Conclusions

The combination of fosfomycin and temocillin demonstrated a benefit in vitro and in vivo against E. coli strains producing KPC-3 or OXA-48-type carbapenemases. This combination prevented the emergence of fosfomycin resistance and proved to be more bactericidal than fosfomycin alone.

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic assessment of oral antibiotics for pyelonephritis

Antibiotic resistance to oral antibiotics recommended for pyelonephritis is increasing. The objective was to determine if there is a pharmacological basis to consider alternative treatments/novel dosing regimens for the oral treatment of pyelonephritis. A systematic review identified pharmacokinetic models of suitable quality for a selection of antibiotics with activity against Escherichia coli. MIC data was obtained for a population of E. coli isolates derived from patients with pyelonephritis. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulations determined probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction response (CFR) values for sub-populations of the E. coli population at varying doses. There are limited high-quality models available for the agents investigated. Pharmacokinetic models of sufficient quality for simulation were identified for amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin, and fosfomycin trometamol. These antibiotics were predicted to have PTAs ≥ 0.85 at or below standard doses for the tested E. coli population including cephalexin 1500 mg 8 hourly for 22% of the population (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin 100 mg 12 hourly for 71% of the population (MIC ≤ 0.06 mg/L). For EUCAST-susceptible E. coli isolates, doses achieving CFRs ≥ 0.9 included amoxicillin 2500 mg 8 hourly, cephalexin 4000 mg 6 hourly, ciprofloxacin 200 mg 12 hourly, and 3000 mg of fosfomycin 24 hourly. Limitations in the PK data support carrying out additional PK studies in populations of interest. Oral antibiotics including amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cephalexin have potential to be effective for a proportion of patients with pyelonephritis. Ciprofloxacin may be effective at lower doses than currently prescribed.

Unexpected Activity of Oral Fosfomycin against Resistant Strains of Escherichia coli in Murine Pyelonephritis

Fosfomycin tromethamine activity is well established for oral treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections, but little is known about its potential efficacy in pyelonephritis. Ascending pyelonephritis was induced in mice infected with 6 strains of Escherichia coli (fosfomycin MICs, 1 μg/ml to 256 μg/ml). The urine pH was 4.5 before infection and 5.5 to 6.0 during infection. Animals were treated for 24 h with fosfomycin (100 mg/kg of body weight subcutaneously every 4 h), and the CFU were enumerated in kidneys 24 h after the last fosfomycin injection. Peak (20.5 μg/ml at 1 h) and trough (3.5 μg/ml at 4 h) levels in plasma were comparable to those obtained in humans after an oral dose of 3 g. Fosfomycin treatment significantly reduced the bacterial loads in kidneys (3.65 log₁₀ CFU/g [range, 1.83 to 7.03 log₁₀ CFU/g] and 1.88 log₁₀ CFU/g [range, 1.78 to 5.74 log₁₀ CFU/g] in start-of-treatment control mice and treated mice, respectively; P < 10^-6). However, this effect was not found to differ across the 6 study strains (P = 0.71) or between the 3 susceptible and the 3 resistant strains (P = 0.09). Three phenomena may contribute to explain this unexpected in vivo activity: (i) in mice, the fosfomycin kidney/plasma concentration ratio increased from 1 to 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.2, 10.4) within 24 h in vitro when the pH decreased to 5, (ii) the fosfomycin MICs for the 3 resistant strains (64 to 256 μg/ml) decreased into the susceptible range (16 to 32 μg/ml), and (iii) maximal growth rates significantly decreased for all strains and were the lowest in urine. These results suggest that local fosfomycin concentrations and physiological conditions may favor fosfomycin activity in pyelonephritis, even against resistant strains.

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Fosfomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic available since the 1970s whose intravenous formulation has been available in many countries outside the USA. Given the rise in drug-resistant bacteria, its introduction into the US market has become a necessity for addressing these organisms. This review provides an overview of the microbiology, clinical pharmacology and initial clinical experiences of the intravenous fosfomycin product (ZTI-01) that is undergoing clinical development in the USA for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis.