Cross-cultural assessment of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory: A psychometric evaluation

A nurse-led coaching intervention with home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure: Protocol for a feasibility randomized clinical trial

Poor treatment adherence and lack of self-care behaviors are significant contributors to hospital readmissions of people with heart failure (HF). A transitional program with non-invasive telemonitoring may help sustain patients and their caregivers to timely recognize signs and symptoms of exacerbation. We will conduct a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-month supportive intervention for patients discharged home after cardiac decompensation. Forty-five people aged 65 years and over will be randomized to either receive a supportive intervention in addition to standard care, which combines nurse-led telephone coaching and a home-based self-monitoring vital signs program, or standard care alone. Four aspects of the feasibility will be assessed using a mixed-methods approach: process outcomes (e.g., recruitment rate), resources required (e.g., adherence to the intervention), management data (e.g., completeness of data collection), and scientific value (e.g. 90- and 180-day all-cause and HF-related readmissions, self-care capacity, quality of life, psychological well-being, mortality, etc.). Participants will be interviewed to explore preferences and satisfaction with the intervention. The study is expected to provide valuable insight into the design of a definitive RCT.

Psychometric Testing of the Cross-Culturally Adapted Thai Version of the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale in Caregivers of Patients With Chronic Illnesses

AIM

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale (CSE-CSC).

BACKGROUND

The CSE-CSC scale was developed congruently with the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Patient with Chronic Illness Inventory (CC-SC-CII) to assess caregiver self-efficacy (CSE), the motivation factor of caregiving. Its applicability in Asian populations, including Thailand, was limited.

METHODS

Psychometric tests were guided by COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) principles. This included translating the English version into Thai, following the principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Nine nursing experts evaluated the content validity. The analysis included caregivers of patients with chronic conditions from 16 primary care centres in Thailand. We tested the structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and concurrent validity for CC-SC-CII-v2. We tested the scale's reliability with methods for multidimensional and unidimensional constructs, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and measurement error variance.

RESULTS

Kappa coefficient (k = 1.00) indicated the scale's excellent content validity. The final analysis included a total of 407 samples. The EFA with the first split-half subsample (n = 194) extracted a two-dimensional structure. One reflected CSE in Maintenance and Monitoring behaviour and another captured CSE in Management behaviour. CFA with the second split-half subsample (n = 213) and the overall sample (n = 407) supported the scale's bidimensional model with high factor loadings. Each dimension and the overall CSE-CSC scale positively correlated with each scale and the overall CC-SC-CII-v2. McDonald's ω and Cronbach's α (both ranged from 0.91-0.94) indicated excellent internal reliability. Test-retest reliability showed ICCs between 0.95 and 0.96. Measurement error yielded satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

Testing of the Thai CSE-CSC scale supported validity and reliability, indicating that the scale can apply to Thai caregivers. This scale can be used in clinical practice and research to evaluate CSE in contribution to patient self-care.

Measuring Self-Care: A Description of the Family of Disease-Specific and Generic Instruments Based on the Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in attention paid to the patient-reported outcome of self-care. Many investigators have used one of the families of self-care instruments freely available on the website www.self-care-measures.com. These self-care measures have been translated into many languages, which are also available on the website. The measures include both disease-specific and generic instruments, which are based on a common theoretical framework, the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to illustrate similarities among the instruments and to standardize their scoring, analysis, and use. We describe the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory, the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory, the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, and the Self-Care Inventory. Detailed guidance on scoring, translation, and analysis is provided. Complementary measures of self-care self-efficacy and those used to measure caregiver contributions to patient self-care are briefly described.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the common questions of instrument users are answered in this article. Following this guidance will facilitate consistent use of the instruments, which will enable users to compare their results to those of others worldwide and facilitate future reviews and meta-analyses.Clinical ImplicationsThis review, emphasizing standard scoring and interpretation, is useful for clinicians and researchers across various populations and settings.

Self-care in patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease and caregiver contribution to self-care (IBD-SELF): a protocol for a longitudinal observational study

INTRODUCTION

Supporting patient self-care and the contribution of their caregivers is crucial in chronic illness care. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition whose prevalence is expected to double, especially in Western countries. IBD symptoms can negatively impact patients' well-being, causing high anxiety, depression, stress and reduced quality of life. These symptoms also affect the health of family members and friends, who often take on caregiving roles during exacerbations. Knowledge about self-care in IBD (IBD-SELF) is limited, and few studies have explored this context. This paper outlines a research protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study to investigate patient self-care and caregiver contributions to IBD-SELF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A sample of 250 consecutive patients diagnosed with IBD and their caregivers will be recruited from 9 dedicated IBD units in northern, central and southern Italy during outpatient visits. Data collection will occur at baseline, 6 and 12 months after enrolment. Multivariable regressions, path analyses and structural equation models will identify predictors (eg, health literacy, caregiver burden and depression) and outcomes (use of healthcare services, disease severity and quality of life) of self-care and caregiver contributions. Dyadic analyses will control for the interdependence of dyad members.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Territorial Ethics Committee (Lazio 3) N. 0023486/23 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier number: NCT06015789). This study will enhance our understanding of the self-care process in the patient-caregiver dyad in IBD, aiding the design of future educational interventions and promoting greater patient and caregiver involvement in the care pathway.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06015789.

Generic and disease-specific self-care instruments in older patients affected by multiple chronic conditions: A descriptive study

AIMS

To describe and compare generic and disease-specific self-care measures in patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in the three dimensions of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management.

DESIGN

Multicentre cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 and over with MCCs. We used Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory to measure generic self-care, Self-care of Diabetes Inventory to measure self-care in diabetes mellitus, Self-Care of Heart Failure (HF) Index to measure self-care in HF, and Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory to measure self-care in chronic lung diseases.

RESULTS

We recruited 896 patients. Multimorbid patients with diabetes had lower scores on the self-care maintenance scale, and diabetic patients in insulin treatment on the generic management scale than on the disease-specific instrument. Multimorbid patients with HF or chronic lung diseases scored higher on generic self-care maintenance and monitoring scales than disease-specific ones. There was a partial consistency between the generic and disease-specific self-care maintenance and management. Inadequate behaviours were recorded in disease-specific self-care monitoring rather than generic ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients affected by MCCs scored differently in the generic and disease-specific instruments, showing inadequate self-care in some of the three self-care dimensions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

The choice between generic and disease-specific instruments to use in clinical practice and research should be made considering the specific aims, settings, patients characteristics, and knowledge of the different performance of the instruments by users.

IMPACT

No study has described and compared generic and specific self-care measures in patients affected by MCCs. Knowing these differences can help nurses choose the most suitable measure for their aims, context, and patients and plan generic and disease-specific self-care educational interventions for those behaviours in which MCCs patients perform poorly.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

Patients were informed about the study, provided informed consent, and answered questionnaires through interviews.

Self-care behaviors and their individual-level determinants in Italian adults with Marfan syndrome: A single-center cross-sectional study

AIM

This study aimed to describe the levels of self-care behaviors and self-care self-efficacy in patients with Marfan syndrome and to identify the individual-level determinants of self-care behaviors.

BACKGROUND

The behaviors aimed at maintaining health stability (self-care maintenance), monitoring signs and symptoms (self-care monitoring), and taking action when signs and symptoms occur (self-care management) are key aspects of the care for addressing the complexity of care of patients with Marfan syndrome. However, the description of self-care behaviors and their determinants in patients with Marfan syndrome are highly under-described.

METHODS

The adopted design was descriptive observational with a cross-sectional data collection on 111 patients with MFS in a single Italian specialized and reference center for this disease between 2020 and 2021.

RESULTS

Performing healthy activities and managing illness, therapies, and follow-ups to maintain health over time (self-care maintenance) was almost adequate (mean score = 67.87 ± 13.17), as well as the ability to recognize signs and symptoms promptly (self-care monitoring, mean score = 67.95 ± 26.70). The ability to respond to symptoms when they occur (self-care management, mean score = 54.17 ± 19.94) was sub-optimal. The stronger positive predictor of each self-care behavior was self-care self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested prioritizing educational activities focused on enhancing self-care management in patients with Marfan syndrome and strengthening their self-care self-efficacy. Researchers should develop and validate evidence-based educational approaches to enhance self-care in patients with Marfan syndrome, and clinical nurses should strengthen their focused educational activities to improve the self-care management of these patients.

Psychometric Testing of the Thai Version of Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 4c in Patients With Stroke

BACKGROUND

Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4c is a non-disease-specific self-care measure used in individuals with multiple chronic conditions. This instrument may be applied to patients with specific diseases such as stroke.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4c in patients with stroke.

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional study adhered to the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) guidelines and enrolled patients with stroke from 16 primary care centers in southern Thailand. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability using Cronbach α coefficient and global reliability index, and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The final analysis included a total of 350 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 2-factor Self-Care Maintenance scale structure, although the item allocation to the dimensions differed from that of the original model. The Self-Care Monitoring scale demonstrated a 1-factor structure with permitted residual covariance. The Self-Care Management scale maintained a 2-factor structure, similar to that of the original model. Simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis of the combined items supported the general model with the 3 scales. The Self-Care Maintenance scale exhibited marginally adequate α (0.68) and ω (0.66) coefficients, and an adequate composite reliability index (0.79). The other 2 scales demonstrated adequate α (range, 0.79-0.86), ω (range, 0.75-0.86), and composite reliability (range, 0.83-0.86) indices. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed adequate test-retest reliability for all scales (range, 0.76-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The generic self-care measure, Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4c, demonstrated strong psychometric properties in patients with stroke. This instrument may be a valuable tool for assessing stroke self-care in Thailand.

Psychometric Analysis of the Health Self-Care Neglect Scale

OBJECTIVES

The Health Self-Care Neglect (HSCN) scale is a measure of self-care neglect developed for use in informal caregivers, where self-care is defined as behaviors undertaken to maintain health. There was no formal psychometric analysis of the scale, so we tested a 9-item, dichotomous-response version of the HSCN scale in a sample of 250 informal caregivers of adults with chronic heart failure.

METHODS

As the indicators of self-care neglect were considered formative (influencing the latent variable directly) rather than reflective (influenced by the latent variable), we used a procedure for the specification of formative measurement models. First, maximally correlated composites of indicators were identified for the latent variable, and optimal scoring weights were developed. Then, the reflective factor was tested with confirmatory factor analysis, and longitudinal invariance of the factorial structure was tested by introducing model constraints. Reliability was assessed with composite reliability model-based estimates. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the HSCN scale total score with the maintenance scale score of the Self-Care Inventory.

RESULTS

Strict invariance, the highest level possible, was achieved. Reliability was 0.81 at baseline. Concurrent validity was demonstrated ( r = -0.475, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis indicate that the HSCN scale is reliable, stable, and valid as a measure of health self-care neglect when tested in a sample of caregivers. The HSCN scale measures the successful performance of self-care, whereas existing measures of self-care reflect intention. Understanding both intention and behavior is useful, so we recommend using the HSCN scale in addition to existing measures of self-care.

The role of nurse-patient mutuality on self-care behaviours in patients with chronic illness

AIM

To examine the role of nurse-patient mutuality on three self-care behaviours in chronic illness patients.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional multi-centre study was conducted.

METHODS

Mutuality was measured with the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale which has the dimensions of developing and going beyond, being a point of reference and deciding and sharing care, and self-care was measured with the Self-care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII). Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess the contribution of three dimensions of mutuality on self-care maintenance, monitoring and management behaviours controlling for patient gender, age, education, number of medications, and presence of a family caregiver.

RESULTS

The sample included 465 inpatients and outpatients with at least one chronic illness. The three dimensions of mutuality had different roles in their influence on the three dimensions of self-care. Developing and going beyond was significantly associated with self-care maintenance and self-care monitoring behaviours. Point of reference was significantly associated with self-care maintenance behaviour. Deciding and sharing care was significantly associated with self-care monitoring and self-care management behaviours.

CONCLUSION

The mutuality between nurse and patient may be a novel area of research to support and improve patient self-care behaviours with implications for clinical practice and education.

IMPLICATION FOR PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Mutuality between nurse and patient increases patient engagement, symptom recognition, decision-making process and patient-centred approach favouring the development of self-care behaviours.

IMPACT

Mutuality between nurse and patient is a new concept and its association with the patient outcomes could bring relevance to the nursing profession. Self-care behaviours are important in the management of chronic diseases, but are difficult to perform. Mutuality between nurse and patient influences the three different behaviours of self-care in chronic illness, for this reason it is important to increase the level of mutuality in this dyad.

REPORTING METHOD

STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed in this study.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients were involved in the sample of the study.

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory based on the Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness

AIMS

To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory on a sample of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China.

BACKGROUND

Measuring the self-care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is vital to promote the performance of effective self-care behaviours. However, few instruments have been developed to measure self-care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the existing instruments lack theoretical support and satisfactory psychometrics properties. The Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory based on Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness has been developed and tested previously in Italian and US population.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional instrument development study.

METHODS

Construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing, and reliability internal consistency using factor score determinacy coefficients.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 185 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was recruited from September 2020 to January 2022. The instrument consists of three scales: self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring and self-care management. Confirmatory factor analysis performed on the three scales produced good fit indices. The internal consistency was adequate with factor score determinacy coefficients ranging from 0.891 to 0.953 in Self-Care Maintenance Scale, 0.990 to 0.993 in Self-Care Monitoring Scale and 0.750 to 0.976 in Self-Care Management Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory has acceptable reliability and validity. Some differences from the original instrument were identified. Further validation studies should be conducted to confirm the psychometric properties of the instrument in Chinese population.

Development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Stroke Inventory

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Self-Care of Stroke Inventory (SCSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, instrument development and the psychometric testing study was conducted. A 23-item self-report Self-Care of Stroke Inventory with 3 separate scales was developed. This study involved three stages: (a) Initial items generation; (b) Content and face validation; (c) Psychometric properties evaluation. The SCSI was validated by content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

From the initial 80-item pool, 24 items of 3 scales in the SCSI were retained by the expert consultation and item analysis. The scale's content validity was 0.976, 0.966, and 0.973. The EFA showed the total variance explained by the 3 scales of the SCSI were 73.417%, 74.281%, and 80.207%, respectively. The models of the 3 scales identified by EFA were all confirmed by the CFA. The SCSI scale shows evidence of good convergent validity. Cronbach's αs were 0.830, 0.930, and 0.831. Test-retest reliability of the SCSI was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945, 0.907, and 0.837.

CONCLUSIONS

The final 23-item SCSI presents good psychometric properties and can be used to explore the self-care of stroke in community settings.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis study developed and validated the Self-Care of Stroke Inventory (SCSI).The SCSI contains the following 3 scales: the Self-care Maintenance of Stroke scale, the Self-care Monitoring of Stroke scale, and the Self-care Management of Stroke scaleThe 23-item SCSI demonstrated strong psychometric properties.The SCSI may be used to develop future programmes to promote self-care for stroke survivors and improve their rehabilitation outcomes.

Spanish version of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory: A validation study amongst community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity

AIM

To psychometrically assess the Spanish version of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII-Sp) in community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity.

DESIGN

A methodological study.

METHOD

A total of 1260 older adults participated in the study between May 2020 and February 2022. The data were analysed using SPSS Statistics® 26 and AMOS® 24. The items' content validity index and the Fleiss' kappa were calculated to assess the SC-CII-Sp's content validity. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient between the participants' scores on the SC-CII-Sp and their scores on the Spanish Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy scale (SCD-SE). Construct validity was tested by performing a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The SC-CII-Sp's reliability was tested by computing the Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

The SC-CII-Sp showed good content and convergent validity. The CFA showed that the SC-CII-Sp has three sub-scales. The 8-item Self-Care Maintenance sub-scale has good internal consistency and is comprised of two dimensions: illness-related and health-promoting behaviour. The Self-Care Monitoring sub-scale had excellent internal consistency and its five loaded items belonged to a single dimension. The 6-item Self-Care Management sub-scale has adequate internal consistency and two dimensions: autonomous and consulting behaviour.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish version of SC-CII is a valid and reliable instrument to be used in the assessment of self-care behaviours amongst Spanish-speaking, community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

Nurses need valid and reliable tools to assess self-care behaviours in Spanish-speaking community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity. This study provides a 19-item tool that allows for the comprehensive evaluation of self-care behaviours in healthy and ill states.

IMPACT

Using the SC-CII-Sp in clinical or research settings could help nurses to examine the effects of different interventions on self-care behaviours amongst Spanish-speaking, community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

None to be reported.

Cardiovascular risk and biopsychosocial interplay: Association among hypertension, anxiety, and emotional dysregulation-observational study in primary care setting for efficient self-care

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to explore the relationship between emotional dimensions of hypertensive patients and the self-care skills; we tried to draw the psychological aspects could impact the health management in hypertension analyzing the effect of emotional regulation on self-care skills: our scope was to highlight the psychological dynamics into behavioral medicine approach.

METHODS

In an observational study design, patients were collected. Patients with diagnosis of hypertension were recruited in primary care setting. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 18 years, with known and medically treated primary hypertension undergoing antihypertensive medication.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis was carried out based on the data of 28 primary hypertensive patients (seven females, 21 males, mean age ± SD: 49.8 ± 7.8 years mean; clinic blood pressure: mean systolic blood pressure: 137.2 ± 13.1 mmHg, mean diastolic blood pressure: 82.1 ± 9.9 mmHg). Mean duration of hypertension in the sample was 13.1 years (±8.2 years). Correlations among the main variables of interest showed a positive and significant relationship between emotional dysregulation indexes, psychological distress, and self-care domains: awareness resulted negatively and significantly correlated to self-efficacy; nonacceptance, goals and impulse indexes seemed positively and significantly correlated to anxiety and depression; finally, stress was correlated positively and significantly to awareness and impulse.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidencing the role of emotion dysregulation on self-care skills and psychological outcomes, and specifically highlighting the impact of emotion dysregulation on self-care, our findings could inform the development and implementation of psychological interventions aimed at promoting psychological well-being and healthy behavior by focusing on the promotion of emotion regulation strategies, to reduce the risk for co-morbidity and/or severe cardiovascular diseases.

Self-care nursing assessment: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Self-care of chronic illness inventory

BACKGROUND

Self-care is the primary means of caring for a chronic condition. Therefore, it is necessary to assess it by using a good validity and reliability instrument. The Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII) is a generic instrument developed to measure self-care processes behaviors using three separate scales in patients with chronic illness. The original cross-cultural assessment concluded the need for future studies sampling patients from different sites to increase the generalizability of the psychometric evaluation results. It was unclear whether this tool had sound psychometrics properties in the context of Spanish culture. The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the SC-CII, test its psychometric properties and validate its use among Spanish people with chronic diseases.

METHODS

A cross-cultural translation of the SC-CII was performed from English to Spanish. The psychometric evaluation was conducted in a sample of 350 patients with chronic conditions through a multicenter cross-sectional study based on the STROBE guideline. Data were collected from face-to-face interviews during 2022. Internal validity was assessed with Confirmatory Factor Analysis, internal consistency reliability with Cronbach alpha for unidimensional scales and McDonald's Omega reliability coefficient for multidimensional scales.

RESULTS

Most (63.4%) participants were older adults aged 65 years or older with a mean age of 65.45 ± 14.97. The average number of chronic conditions reported was 2.81%; the most common conditions were hypertension (52.3%), musculoskeletal disorders (46.3%) and diabetes (38.9%). Patients reported adequate self-care behaviors in all three scales of the SC-CII. The Self-Care Maintenance and Management scales were multidimensional, and the Self-Care Monitoring scale was unidimensional. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the Self-Care Maintenance and Monitoring scales had satisfactory fit indices. The Self-care Management scale had acceptable fit indices. The Omega reliability coefficient for multidimensional scales was 0.75 (Self-Care Maintenance) and 0.72 (Self-Care Management). The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the Self-Care Monitoring scale was 0.85. Item-total correlations were all significant except one. Test-retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

The SC-CII has appropriate psychometrics characteristics and is a culturally suitable and reliable instrument for assessing to the self-care behaviors of patients with chronic disease in Spain. The scale provides a simple and rapid solution to assess the self-care process.

Dyadic Archetypes of Patient Self-Care and Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care in Dyads With Multiple Chronic Conditions: An Observational Study

Self-care of multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) and caregiver contribution to self-care have been theorized as dyadic. However, the different dyadic archetypes are still unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify dyadic archetypes related to how in patient-caregiver dyads manage the patient's MCCs and to describe other ways in which the dyadic archetypes differ. A sample of 340 MCCs patient-caregiver dyads was enrolled in outpatient and community settings. Patients had a mean age of 76.7 (±7.3) years and were mostly female (54.5%). Caregivers had a mean age of 54.6 (±15.1) years and were mostly female (71.5%). Four dyadic archetypes were observed: "autonomous," "compensatory," "balanced," and "complementary" care. Clinical programs should consider the different characteristics of dyads to support self-care.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 4.c

Objectives

To translate and validate the Thai Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (Thai SC-CII v4.c) in individuals with chronic illnesses.

Methods

A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated for Thai involved nine steps: preparation, forward translation, reconciliation, back-translation, back-translation review, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, review of cognitive debriefing and finalization, and proofreading. A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to November 2022 at 16 primary care centers in southern Thailand, involving 410 participants with at least one chronic condition. Validity assessments included structural, convergent, and discriminant validity. Concurrent validity examined correlations between SC-CII v4.c with the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES) and self-perceived health. Internal coherence reliability was calculated using Cronbach's α coefficient, item-total correlation coefficients, and the composite reliability (CR) index.

Results

Thai SC-CII v4.c demonstrated excellent translational validity (κ = 0.99). The specified Self-Care Maintenance model fit well, with minor differences in health promoting behavior and illness-related behavior items compared to the original model. The original Self-Care Monitoring, and Self-Care Management models fit well with Thai data. Simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a satisfactory fit of the full SC-CII v4.c. Convergent validity had partial support (average variance extracted = 0.23-0.51), and discriminant validity was established (heterotrait-monotrait ratios = 0.37-0.88). Concurrent validity was supported by positive correlations between each scale and overall SC-CII v.4c with SCSES (r = 0.25-0.65) and self-perceived health (r = 0.09-0.35). The Cronbach's α coefficient were adequate for all scales except the Self-Care Maintenance scale (Cronbach's α = 0.68), but the CR estimate improved the reliability of all three scales (ranging 0.80-0.82). All items had satisfactory item-total correlation coefficients (ranging 0.34-0.71), except the one pertaining to sleep.

Conclusions

The Thai SC-CII v4.c is valid and reliable for assessing self-care in various chronic illnesses. Further testing is recommended for patients with specific diseases.

Psychometric properties of the self-care of chronic illness inventory in Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions

BACKGROUND

Existing self-care measures for the Chinese population are specific to single chronic conditions. No generic self-care measures exist for the Chinese population with multiple chronic conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To test the structural validity, concurrent validity and reliability of the Self-care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII) in Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline. A diverse sample of Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions (n = 240) was recruited. Structural validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was investigated with hypotheses testing of the relationships between perceived stress, resilience and self-care. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Finally, a simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the general model with all items and all three subscales.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the self-care maintenance and self-care management subscales and the one-factor structure of the self-care monitoring subscale. Concurrent validity was supported by the significant negative correlation (r ranged from -0.18 to -0.38, p < .01) with perceived stress and the significant positive correlation (r ranged from 0.31 to 0.47, p < .01) with resilience. Reliability estimates ranged from 0.77 to 0.82 across the three subscales. The simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis did not support the more general model with the combined set of items.

CONCLUSION

The SC-CII is valid and reliable for Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Future cross-cultural assessment should be conducted to investigate the measurement equivalence of the SC-CII in individuals from Western and Eastern cultural groups.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

With the increasing number of older adults in China who are living with multiple chronic conditions and the call for culturally tailored self-care interventions, this self-care measure can be used in geriatric primary care settings, long-term facilities and homes to improve the understanding and practice of self-care in older Chinese adults.

Psychometric Characteristics of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory in Older Adults Living in a Middle-Income Country

Chronic illness requires numerous treatments and self-care is essential in the care process. Evaluation of self-care behaviors facilitates the identification of patients' needs and optimizes education and care processes. This study aimed to test the psychometric characteristics (validity, reliability, and measurement error) of the Albanian version of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII). Patients with multiple chronic conditions and caregivers were recruited in outpatient clinics in Albania. The patients completed the SC-CII, which includes three scales: self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management. Factorial validity was tested for each scale, with confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was evaluated with the composite coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and the global reliability index for multidimensional scales. The construct validity was tested using hypothesis testing and known differences between groups. The measurement error was tested to assess responsiveness to changes. The self-care maintenance and self-care monitoring scales showed a unidimensional factorial structure, while the self-care management scale showed a bidimensional structure. Reliability estimates were adequate for all reliability coefficients. Construct validity was supported. The measurement error was adequate. The Albanian version of the SC-CII shows good psychometric properties in the Albanian sample.

Association Between Self-care and Resilience: A Cross-sectional Study in Heart Failure Patients

BACKGROUND

Self-care (SC) is a cornerstone in heart failure management and is related to patient outcomes. The continuous and complex demands of SC can be experienced as stressful and may require patients to apply resilient behaviors as they manage their conditions. Resilience may be a helpful factor in performing SC.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the association between resilience and SC in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed between January 2020 and January 2021. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire addressing baseline characteristics, the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire, the Resilience Evaluation Scale, and the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, which measures 3 concepts of SC: SC maintenance, SC monitoring, and SC management. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine whether resilience was associated with SC.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included, and 74 patients completed the questionnaire. In the univariate analysis, an association was found between resilience and SC maintenance, resulting in an increase in SC for patients with higher resilience (β = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.96). In the multivariate analysis adjusted and corrected for confounders, no significant associations between resilience and all SC scales were found.

CONCLUSION

This study could not demonstrate significant associations between resilience and all SC scales. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on factors that can mediate or moderate SC. Further longitudinal research should be performed to study cause-effect relationships.

Associations between continuity of care, perceived control and self-care and their impact on health-related quality of life and hospital readmission-A structural equation model

AIM

The aim of this study is to examine whether a conceptual model including the associations between continuity of care, perceived control and self-care could explain variations in health-related quality of life and hospital readmissions in people with chronic cardiac conditions after hospital discharge.

DESIGN

Correlational design based on cross-sectional data from a multicentre survey study.

METHODS

People hospitalized due to angina, atrial fibrillation, heart failure or myocardial infarction were included at four hospitals using consecutive sampling procedures during 2017-2019. Eligible people received questionnaires by regular mail 4-6 weeks after discharge. A tentative conceptual model describing the relationship between continuity of care, self-care, perceived control, health-related quality of life and readmission was developed and evaluated using structural equation modelling.

RESULTS

In total, 542 people (mean age 75 years, 37% females) were included in the analyses. According to the structural equation model, continuity of care predicted self-care, which in turn predicted health-related quality of life and hospital readmission. The association between continuity of care and self-care was partly mediated by perceived control. The model had an excellent model fit: RMSEA = 0.06, 90% CI, 0.05-0.06; CFI = 0.90; TLI = 0.90.

CONCLUSION

Interventions aiming to improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital readmission rates should focus on enhancing continuity of care, perceived control and self-care.

IMPACT

This study reduces the knowledge gap on how central factors after hospitalization, such as continuity of care, self-care and perceived control, are associated with improved health-related quality of life and hospital readmission in people with cardiac conditions. The results suggest that these factors together predicted the quality of life and readmissions in this sample. This knowledge is relevant to researchers when designing interventions or predicting health-related quality of life and hospital readmission. For clinicians, it emphasizes that enhancing continuity of care, perceived control and self-care positively impacts clinical outcomes.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

People and healthcare personnel evaluated content validity and were included in selecting items for the short version.

The perceived effects of COVID-19 while living with a chronic illness

INTRODUCTION

A diagnosis of chronic illness posed a serious threat to people during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. People with chronic illnesses were faced with increased mortality and reduced access to healthcare. Self-care is the process of maintaining health and managing a chronic illness. Nurses working in specialist services provide healthcare education to people with chronic illnesses. Access to these nurses was decreased during periods of the COVID-19 virus escalation due to the reconfiguration of services and redeployment of nurses. The purpose of the research was to learn from the experiences of people with a chronic illnesses in self-care behaviors and accessing altered healthcare services to inform future practices.

DESIGN

A population survey design.

METHODS

A mixed methods survey was designed, combining validated questionnaires and scales with open-ended questions. A convenience sample was utilized via using social media platforms. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended responses.

RESULTS

There were 147 responses, with approximately half reporting no changes in face-to-face healthcare contact, 41% reporting decreased contacts and 12% increased contacts. Non-face-to-face contacts were reduced by almost 9%, did not change by almost 60%, while 33% indicated an increase. Participants reported mixed perceptions in contact with healthcare providers during restrictions. In the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and the Self-Care of Chronic Illness scales, participants scored statistically lower scores than in previous studies. Participants indicated that public health restrictions negatively impacted their confidence, created challenges with re-engaging and that access to care was more difficult.

CONCLUSION

This research highlights the importance of providing continued support to people with chronic illness irrespective of other challenges to healthcare services. A structured approach to virtual self-care education is required.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This research concluded that the experience of access to one healthcare professional as opposed to diverse multidisciplinary input was similar for a number of chronic illnesses groups of people during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was an altered dynamic of virtual contacts with healthcare providers and a lack of confidence interpreting what monitoring was required by people with a chronic illnesses due to a lack of preparedness for virtual healthcare delivery.

Chronic non-communicable diseases and health awareness of patients: An observational study analysing the health adaptive behaviours through self-care skills

The incidence of chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs) increases with age, thus placing a burden on individuals and healthcare systems; furthermore, CNCDs are associated with lower quality of life (QoL) in the elderly. This study aimed to evaluate the behavioural management of CNCDs by comparing different diseases under its ambit exhibiting various side effects, as well as vascular, gastrointestinal, and other chronic diseases, simultaneously analysing self-care efficacy and emotional dimensions (i.e. anxiety, stress, and depression). A total of 122 outpatients aged >18 years (mean age, 50.0 years; standard deviation, ±13.8) participated in the study, and 59% of the participants were women. The psychological battery was composed of three standardised self-assessments measuring the relevant emotional dimensions, QoL, and self-care indices. Analysis of the emotional dimensions of depression, anxiety, and stress indices resulted in significant differences. Furthermore, post-hoc analyses (Tukey test) showed that patients with gastrointestinal disease (GD) experienced depression more than patients with vascular disease (VD) (p = 0.002). In addition, there were no differences between the VD and Oth and between the GD and Oth groups; however, the Oth group appeared to experience more anxiety than the VD group (p = 0.04); there were no differences between the GD and VD groups, as well the Oth group. The ANCOVA test compared the chronic disease groups, the disease stage (early and long-term), self-care indices, and sex. They were covariated by age, showing a significant effect on the management index only in chronic disease groups (p = 0.007). Our study suggests that the following specific factors need to be considered in health decision-making processes to enhance the compliance of patients to the clinically expected results: (1) tailored clinical therapies; (2) side effects of disease; (3) comorbidity; (4) mental health. The harmonisation of these internal and external factors could offer a powered perspective for personalized medicine.

Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0

BACKGROUND

In this updated Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) v3.0, items were added to better reflect the theory of self-care of chronic illness and revised based on recent research. The expanded SC-CHDI now reflects the theoretical concepts of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SC-CHDI v3.0.

METHODS

In a sample of adults with coronary heart disease, we tested the SC-CHDI v3.0 validity with confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was calculated using Cronbach α, factor score determinacy coefficient, and global reliability index for multidimensional scales, with values > 0.70 considered adequate.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 205) was predominantly male (79%) with a mean age of 65.3 ± 11.1 years. The self-care maintenance scale encompassed 2 distinct behaviors, namely, "illness related behaviors" and "health promoting behaviors," which reflect consulting and autonomous dimensions, respectively. The goodness-of-fit indices were adequate: χ2(25, N = 205) =31.86, P = .16, comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.04 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.07), P = .705, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.045. Analysis of the new self-care monitoring scale yielded a single factor; goodness-of-fit indices were excellent: χ2(12, N = 205) =11.56, P = .48, comparative fit index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation < 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.000-0.07), P = .86, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. The self-care management scale had 2 dimensions of autonomous and consulting behavior with strong goodness-of-fit indices: χ2(7, N = 205) =6.57, P = .47, comparative fit index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation ≤ 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.00-0.08), P = .76, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. Reliability estimates were ≥0.80 for all scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Our testing suggests that the SC-CHDI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with coronary heart disease.

Cardiovascular disease, self-care and emotional regulation processes in adult patients: balancing unmet needs and quality of life

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is a chronic non-communicable illness that causes more than half of all deaths across Europe. Unhealthy lifestyle, inadequate adherence to medical prescriptions, themselves associated with psycho-emotional disorders are considered risk factors for reduced quality of life as well physical condition.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of our study was to understand predictive factors for disease management by evaluating psychological aspects, self-care processes and emotional regilati0on in CVD outpatients.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted. Sixty-one patients, age 18-75 years (M 56.4 ± sd 12.0), diagnosed with CVD participated in the study. The psychological battery was administered during clinical follow-up oriented to detect emotional and psychological dimensions as well adaptive behavioral and quality of life by standardized questionnaire/scales.

RESULTS

Finding showed that emotional dysregulation might influence QoL, particularly significant effect of awareness (β= 0.022; SE = 1.826; p < 0.002), goals (β = - 0.54; SE = 1.48; p < 0.001) and clarity (β = - 0.211; SE = 2.087; p < 0.003). The results also suggest that the mediated effect accounted for awareness index was 18.7% (R² = 0.187) of the variance; goals index 62.8% (R² = 0.628) of the variance and, then significant mediated effect of clarity was 58.8% (R² = 0.588) of the variance. This evidence suggests that the relationship between triggers and QoL is mediated by emotional dysregulation indexes.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice psychological screening can be an effective tool for detecting predictive factors in the management of the CVD patient's health and adherence to medical treatment: the screening of predictive psychological factors for allowing a good clinical condition management and a self-care empowerment aimed at increasing psychological well-being and the Quality of Life by planning adequate integrated and multidisciplinary support.

Patient Self-Care and Caregiver Contribution to Patient Self-Care of Chronic Conditions: What Is Dyadic and What It Is Not

OBJECTIVES

Self-care of chronic conditions involves both patients and their informal caregivers and therefore might be considered as a dyadic phenomenon. Nevertheless, empirical evidence supporting a dyadic construct is unavailable. This study aimed to explore the existence of a dyadic construct in self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management in patients affected by chronic conditions and their informal caregivers.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional design. We used the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, which measure patient self-care and informal caregivers' contribution to self-care maintenance, monitoring and management. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling was performed to verify the existence of dyadic latent constructs in each scale in patients and informal caregivers.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 493 patients and informal caregivers, with a mean age of 76.47 and 52.76 years, respectively, was studied. In the self-care maintenance scales, 2 correlated factors (r = 0.34, P < .001) were identified, indicating the presence of a dyadic second-order construct. In addition, 2 factors that were not correlated (r = 0.11, P = .064) were identified in the self-care monitoring scales, indicating the absence of a dyadic construct. Finally, we found a 3-factor model in the self-care management scales composed of both patient and caregiver items, indicating a dyadic first-order construct.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing which care behaviors are dyadic in chronic conditions is important for tailoring interventions to improve self-care. Self-care maintenance and management would benefit from dyadic interventions, while self-care monitoring would not. The results of this study may illuminate future theoretical and scientific developments in dyadic care of chronic illness.

Symptom Recognition as a Mediator in the Self-Care of Chronic Illness

Background

The recognition of a symptom is needed to initiate a decision to engage in a behavior to ameliorate the symptom. Yet, a surprising number of individuals fail to detect symptoms and delay in addressing early warnings of a health problem.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that symptom recognition mediates the relationship between monitoring for and management of symptoms of a chronic illness.

Methods

A secondary analysis of existing cross-sectional data. A sample of 1,629 patients diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions was enrolled in the United States (US) (n = 407), Italy (n = 784) and Sweden (n = 438) between March 2015 and May 2019. Data on self-care monitoring, symptom recognition, and self-care management was assessed using the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory. After confirming metric invariance in cultural assessment, we used structural equation modeling to test a mediation model where symptom recognition was conceptualized as the mediator linking self-care monitoring and self-care management with autonomous (e.g., Change your activity level) and consulting behaviors (e.g., Call your healthcare provider for guidance).

Results

Symptom recognition mediated the relation between self-care monitoring and autonomous self-care management behaviors (β = 0.098, β = 0.122, β = 0.081, p < 0.001 for US, Italy, and Sweden, respectively). No mediation effect was found for consulting self-care management behaviors.

Conclusion

Our findings suggests that symptom recognition promotes autonomous self-care behaviors in people with a chronic condition. Self-care monitoring directly affects consulting self-care management behaviors but not through symptom recognition. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of symptom recognition in the self-care process.

Measuring self-care in the general adult population: development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care Inventory

Background

Self-care is important at all stages of life and health status to promote well-being, prevent disease, and improve health outcomes. Currently, there is a need to better conceptualize self-care in the general adult population and provide an instrument to measure self-care in this group. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Self-Care Inventory (SCI), a theory-based instrument to measure self-care in the general adult population.

Methods

Based on the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care, the 20-item SCI was developed with three scales: Self-Care Maintenance (8 items), Self-Care Monitoring (6 items), and Self-Care Management (6 items). A cross sectional study with a US-based sample (n = 294) was conducted to test the SCI. Internal validity was assessed with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach alpha for unidimensional scales or composite reliability and the global reliability index for multidimensional scales. Construct validity was investigated with Pearson correlation to test the relationship between general self-efficacy, positivity, stress, and self-care scores.

Results

The Self-Care Maintenance and Management scales were multidimensional and the Self-Care Monitoring scale was unidimensional. The global reliability index for multidimensional scales was 0.85 (self-care maintenance) and 0.88 (self-care management). Cronbach alpha coefficient of the self-care monitoring scale was 0.88. Test-retest reliability was 0.81 (self-care maintenance), 0.91 (self-care monitoring), and 0.76 (self-care management). The General Self-Efficacy Scale was positively related to all three self-care scale scores: self-care maintenance r = 0.46, p < 0. 001, self-care monitoring r = 0.31, p < 0. 001, and self-care management r = 0.32, p < 0. 001. The positivity score was positively related to self-care maintenance (r = 0.42, p < 0. 001), self-care monitoring (r = 0.29, p < 0. 001), and self-care management (r = 0.34, p < 0. 001) scores. The perceived stress was positively related to the self-care management (r = 0.20, p < 0. 001) score.

Conclusions

The SCI is a theoretically based instrument designed to measure self-care in the general adult population. Preliminary evidence of validity and reliability supports its use in the general adult population.

Validation and reliability of the Care Vulnerability Index: A study by interrater agreement and test-retest method

Aim

The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Care Vulnerability Index (CVI) as a tool to estimate the need and competence of care.

Design

A cross‐sectional survey including a longitudinal component.

Methods

Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated by interrater agreement of a group of 11 experts in two rounds. The test–retest analysis was measured in an urban population of Colombia with 96 participants through two statistical tests: Pearson's correlation coefficient and the difference in means.

Results

Care Vulnerability Index turned out to be valid with a CVR of 0.879. Reliability by Pearson correlation between test–retest was 0.912 (CI95: 0.872–0.941; p‐value <.01) and there was no significant mean difference between test and retest in global score and in clustered groups of variables. Validating CVI will make it possible to prioritize healthcare resources in the population and identify people susceptible to care problems.

Self-Care of African Immigrant Adults with Chronic Illness

This cross-sectional study aims to describe the self-care of adult African immigrants in the US with chronic illness and explore the relationship between acculturation and self-care. A total of 88 African immigrants with chronic illness were enrolled. Self-care was measured with the Self Care of Chronic Illness Inventory v3 and the Self-Care Self-Efficacy scale. Scores are standardized 0 to 100 with scores >70 considered adequate. Acculturation was measured using a modified standardized acculturation instrument and predefined acculturation proxies. The self-care scores showed adequate self-care, with the mean scores of 78.6, 77.9, and 75.6 for self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management. Self-care self-efficacy mean score was 81.3. Acculturation was not significantly associated with self-care. Self-care self-efficacy was a strong determinant of self-care maintenance (p < .0001), monitoring (p < .0001), and management (p < .0001). The perception of inadequate income was a significant determinant of poor self-care management (p = .03). Self-care self-efficacy and perceived income adequacy were better determinants of self-care than acculturation.

Relationship between resilience and self-care in people with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Living with chronic condition(s) is difficult, due in part to the complexities of effective disease self-care. Self-care has been considered a challenging process according to the literature which describes multiple barriers patients with chronic conditions experience. Resilience has the potential to buffer the adversities of daily self-care and maintain physical and emotional well-being. No systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted to synthesise and quantify the relationship between resilience and self-care across chronic conditions.

AIMS

(1) To examine how the definitions and measurements of self-care and resilience align with the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness (i.e. self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management) and 3 Rs of resilience process from the society-to-cells framework (i.e. resistance, recovery and rebound) across different chronic conditions; and (2) to examine whether and the degree to which resilience is correlated with self-care across different chronic conditions.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX and PsychINFO were searched for quantitative studies published from January 2000 through July 2020. Descriptive data were summarised using numerical counting to provide an overview of the study characteristics. Definitions and measurements of self-care and resilience were synthesised narratively based on self-care and resilience theories. Numerical data with Pearson's product-moment correlation among observational studies were examined using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This review included 20 articles, involving 9,269 individuals across 11 chronic conditions. Despite self-care and resilience being defined and operationalised in a variety of ways, most definitions shared some underlying core constructs. Meta-analysis showed a positive relationship between resilience and self-care across chronic conditions. Findings from interventional studies indicated a bidirectional relationship between resilience and self-care.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, resilience was positively associated with self-care in people with chronic conditions. Longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to better understand the causal relationship between resilience and self-care.

RELEVANT TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Resilience has the potential to buffer the adversities of daily self-care and maintain physical and emotional well-being. The positive relationship between resilience and self-care found in this review provides preliminary evidence for clinicians to not only focus on reducing barriers and risk factors of self-care but also to improve or increase patients' resilience through various evidence-based interventions.

Mutuality in nursing: A conceptual framework on the relationship between patient and nurse

AIMS

To describe and develop a conceptual framework for the process of mutuality between nurse and patient.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative study with a grounded theory (GT) design following the constructivist approach of Charmaz (SAGE handbook of research, 2014).

METHODS

A sample of 33 patients with one or more chronic diseases and 35 nurses were interviewed between July and October 2020. Comparative and simultaneous data analyses were conducted. Theoretical sampling and saturation of categories were used to define the sample size.

RESULTS

A conceptual framework for mutuality between nurse (mean age 42 SD ±7 years, 89% female) and patient (mean age 63 SD ±8 years, 42% female) was developed, including the mutuality process, potential influencing factors for both nurses and patients, and outcomes. The mutuality process was characterised by three dimensions: developing and going beyond, being a reference, and deciding and sharing care. Influencing factors for nurses were personal characteristics and professional organisation, while for patients these were age and past experiences. Nurse outcomes were satisfaction and quality of life; patient outcomes were improved self-care and reduction of hospitalisation and emergency admissions.

CONCLUSION

This study described a new conceptual framework for mutuality between nurse and patient, which could improve our understanding of the relationship between nurses and patients, thus enhancing both nurse and patient outcomes.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver contribution to self-care of chronic illness inventory in China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Caregiver contribution (CC) is important for the self-care behaviors of chronic disease individuals, as it could enhance patient outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to assess this CC by using a good validity and reliability instrument. The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory (CC-SC-CII) was designed to assess CC to self-care behaviors of patients with chronic illness in Italy. However, it was unclear whether this tool had sound psychometrics properties in the context of Chinese culture. Therefore, we performed the cross-cultural adaption of the CC-SC-CII and we tested its psychometric properties among Chinese caregivers of patients with chronic disease.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional observational design.

SETTINGS

Participants were recruited from communities and institutions in Pingdingshan, Henan Province, China.

PARTICIPANTS

301 caregivers of care recipients with chronic disease completed the Chinese version of the CC-SC-CII (C-CC-SC-CII).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The content validity index of items (I-CVI), the scale content validity index-average (S-CVI/Ave), exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency and item analysis were tested.

RESULTS

The range of I-CVI was between 0.833 and 1.00, and the score of S-CVI was 0.991. In CFA, the C-CC to self-care monitoring scale had satisfactory fit indices. However, the C-CC to self-care maintenance and management scales had unsupported fit indices. The reliability coefficients of C-CC-SC-CII were 0.792, 0.880 and 0.870 for its three scales. Item-total correlations were all over 0.590. Test-retest reliability showed that the range of intraclass correlation coefficients was from 0.728 to 0.783.

CONCLUSION

The C-CC-SC-CII has sound psychometrics characteristics and is a culturally appropriate and reliable instrument for assessing CC to the self-care behaviours of patients with chronic disease in China.

Self-care research: How to grow the evidence base? (reprint)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The number of studies in the area of self-care is growing and international researchers are increasingly developing self-care interventions to improve outcomes of individual patients and communities. However, growth of the evidence is still slow due to challenges with designing and testing self-care interventions. In this article we address major methodological challenges with regard to the definition of self-care, use of theory, and research design, intended to provide guidance to researchers in this field.

METHOD

During the inaugural conference of the International Center for Self-Care Research held in Rome, Italy in June 2019 we identified important issues in existing self-care research. Discussion and literature review lead to eight recommendation for future self-care research.

RESULTS

In preparation, begin with a theoretically sound definition of self-care. In planning the intervention, build on and extend previous studies. Use theory to develop self-care interventions and consider translational models to guide development, evaluation and implementation of complex self-care interventions. Employ a study design that fits the current phase and objectives of the research and measure self-care and related factors carefully. In reporting, describe the sample and setting sufficiently so that others can draw conclusions about generalizability and applicability to their practice and patient population. In interpretation, describe how the intervention is assumed to work (causal assumptions) and its key components.

CONCLUSION

Our review of existing self-care research clearly illustrates that the recommendations we provide are needed if we are to substantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care. Embracing a core set of principles will allow us to build on each other's work. Tweetable abstract: A core set of methodological principles is needed to substantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care.

Perspectives of Health Care Providers on the Role of Culture in the Self-Care of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Qualitative Interview Study

Background: Self-care is important in chronic diseases such as heart failure. The cultural background of health care providers might influence their view on self-care behaviour and education they provide. The aim of this study was to describe health care providers’ perceptions of the role of culture in self-care and how those perceptions shape their experiences and their practices. Methods: A qualitative study was performed in Israel, a country with a culturally diverse population. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 12 healthcare providers from different cultural backgrounds. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis. Results: Healthcare providers experienced cultural background influenced their patients’ self-care behaviour. Perceived culture-specific barriers to self-care such as dietary traditions interfering with the recommended diet, willingness to undertake self-care and beliefs conflicting with medical treatment were identified. Healthcare providers described that they adapted patient education and care based on the cultural background of the patients. Shared cultural background, awareness and knowledge of differences were described as positively influencing self-care education, while cultural differences could complicate this process. Conclusions: Cultural-specific barriers for self-care were perceived by health care providers and they identified that their own cultural background shapes their experiences and their practices.

Psychometric characteristics of the caregiver contribution to self-care of chronic illness inventory

AIM

The purpose of the this study was to test the factorial structure, internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory.

BACKGROUND

Existing measures of caregiver contribution to self-care are disease-specific or behaviour-specific; no generic measures exist.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Between April 2017 - December 2018, we enrolled a convenience sample of 358 patients with chronic illnesses and their caregivers. Patients completed the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory while caregivers completed the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, a modification of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory, which includes three scales as follows: the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Maintenance, the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Monitoring and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Management. Of each scale, we tested the factorial structure with confirmatory factor analysis and reliability with the factor score determinacy coefficient, the global reliability index for multidimensional scale and Cronbach's alpha. Also, we used Pearson's correlations for concurrent validity purposes.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Maintenance and Management scales and the one-factor structure of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Monitoring scale. A simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis on the combined set of items supported the more general model (Comparative Fit Index = 0.933). Reliability estimates ranged between 0.701 and 0.961 across the three scales. Concurrent validity of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory with the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory was not sufficiently supported since weak correlations were found.

CONCLUSION

The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory is valid and reliable and can be used in clinical practice and research.

IMPACT

The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory is an useful instrument to evaluate the extent to which caregivers contribute to patient self-care in chronic illnesses.