Impact of an enhanced recovery program for cesarean delivery on postoperative opioid use

Integrative Review of Opioid Use and Protocol Adherence in Hospitals After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.

CONCLUSION

While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.

Enhanced recovery after caesarean section: Implementation of an ERAC protocol in a tertiary obstetric hospital

OBJECTIVE

Assess safety and efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean protocol.

BACKGROUND

Caesarean sections are among the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide, but have been associated with postoperative chronic pain and opioid abuse.

METHODS

ASA 2 females, over 18 years, non-primiparous, repeat elective LSCS. Primary outcomes were length of stay and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, functional assessment scores, pruritus, nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

A total of 579 women divided into standard care (389 patients) and enhanced recovery after caesarean groups (190 patients). Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with reduced length of stay, 50.8 hours (interquartile range 48.6, 53.6) versus 72.2 hours (interquartile range 53.2, 75.7) in standard care. Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with reduced opioid consumption, median 10 (interquartile range 0, 27.5mg) versus 120mg (interquartile range 90, 145mg) in standard care at 24 hours and 30 (interquartile range 7.7, 67.5mg) versus 177.5mg (interquartile range 132.5, 222.5 mg) at 48 hours. Pain scores reduced from moderate to mild in the enhanced recovery after caesarean. functional assessment scores trend towards improved function in the enhanced recovery after caesarean group (Functional assessment scores B 8.9% in enhanced recovery after caesarean versus 147% in standard care). Increased pruritus in the enhanced recovery after caesarean with 41.6% compared with 9.3% in standard care. Nausea and vomiting increased in enhanced recovery after caesarean group 48.9% versus 11.6% in standard care.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with a reduction in length of stay, opioid consumption and improved pain scores with an increase in side effects.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol on maternal outcomes following emergency caesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial

Background

With ever increasing rates of emergency caesarean deliveries (CD),incorporating the ERAS protocol might provide a perfect window of opportunity to increase maternal comfort during the postsurgical period, but also improve outcomes and facilitate optimal return of physiological function.

Objective

To determine whether an ERAS pathway at emergency caesarean birth would permit a reduction in postoperative length of stay and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.

Material & methods

Patients undergoing emergent caesarean delivery at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were randomized to ERAS or conventional care. The primary outcome was to compare postoperative length of hospital stay. Secondary outcome variables included first oral intake, passage of flatus/defecation, first ambulation, first urination after catheter removal and postoperative pain scores in both groups.

Results

We randomized 142 women (71 each in ERAS versus Conventional arm) undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. Incorporation of ERAS protocol resulted in shorter length of hospital stay (73.92 ± 8.96 in conventional arm vs 53.87 ± 15.02 in ERAS arm; p value <.0001). Significant difference was seen in visual analogue scoring during initial ambulation and rest on day 0 and day 1 between ERAS and conventional arms with mean scores being lower in ERAS arm compared to Conventional arm (p value <.05). In terms of quality of life, ERAS arm had better quality of life compared to conventional arm.

Conclusion

Incorporation of ERAS protocol in emergency caesarean definitely improves patient outcome in terms of early resumption of activities with better quality of life.

Practice of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery in resource-limited setting

Background

Caesarean section is one of the most common procedures and clinician faces dual challenges with feto-maternal morbidity and mortality after caesarean delivery. Enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery protocols might effectively reduce postoperative feto-maternal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess practice of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery among parturients who underwent elective caesarean delivery.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was conducted from March to June 2021 on 225 consecutive parturients scheduled for elective caesarean delivery. A semi-structured questionnaire which developed from Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, evidence-based recommendations regarding enhanced recovery after a caesarean (2020) to collect data. Data was collected through direct observation, reviewing the chart, and patient's interview. Data were entered and analyzed in SPSS version 20.

Result

Preoperative pathway; limit fasting interval (91%), haemoglobin screen and optimization (82%), and patient education (100%) found good Areas of practice Intraoperative pathway; administering postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (100%), fluid optimization (88%), neuraxial anaesthesia with a neuraxial opioid (91%), initiating multimodal analgesia (88%), optimal uterotonic administration (88%), delayed umbilical cord clamping (85%), and prophylactic antibiotic (100%) found areas with good areas of practice. Postoperative pathways; initiation of multimodal analgesia (74%) and early removal of the urinary catheter (62%) were found areas good areas of practice.

Conclusion and recommendation

The overall practice of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery was below the target. The authors recommend that this comprehensive and specialized hospital administrator implement enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery protocol and give short-term training for health professionals' about the protocol.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery rate is increasing, with no prediction of this rate to drop. Implementation of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program adapted to this high prevalent obstetrical surgical procedure proposes better peri-operative care achievement with improved maternal medical care, namely reduced morbidity, faster return to normal daily activities and improved impact on quality of life. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of ERAS guidelines implementation in cesarean sections (CS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed across 3 databases (MEDLINE (Pubmed), Scopus and Web of Science), with no time or language filters, for articles comparing outcomes on pregnant women who delivered via CS with ERAS guidelines implementation versus the traditional approach without ERAS implementation. Outcomes established: primary - hospital length of stay; secondary - opioid consumption, readmission rates and maternal complications (overall, surgical site infection and emetic morbidity). Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and its results were expressed as mean difference, standardized mean difference and odds ratio, with 95% of confidence intervals. This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 16 studies (3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective cohorts and 9 retrospective cohorts), with a pool analysis of 19,001 women (9752 with the traditional approach and 9249 following ERAS guidelines). Our results showed a significative decrease in length of hospital stay (MD: -13.78 h; CI 95 % -19.28 to -8.28; p < 0.00001) and opioid consumption (SMD: -0.91; CI 95 % -1.51 to -0.32; p = 0.003), with similar readmission rates (OR: 0.85; CI 95 % 0.50 to 1.44; p = 0.53) and maternal complications, namely: overall (OR: 0.87; CI 95 % 0.56 to 1.35; p = 0.53); surgical site infection (OR: 1.13; CI 95 % 0.72 to 1.77; p = 0.60) and emetic morbidity (OR: 0.78; CI 95 % 0.31 to 1.96; p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS guidelines applied at CS management are associated with decreased length of stay and opioid consumption, without negatively impact on readmission rates and overall maternal complications, including surgical site infection and emetic morbidity. The reduced number of RCT studies and the heterogeneity of the studies (heterogeneous inter-study protocols) constitutes the major limitation of the evidence found. Still, these findings may be a foremost help to confirm the beneficial impact of an ERAS approach during peri-cesarean management.

Evolution of postoperative care: marked reduction of opioid consumption when ERAC pathway added to wound soaker therapy for cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

Achieving functional recovery after cesarean delivery is critical to a parturient's ability to care for herself and her newborn. Adequate pain control is vital, and without it, many other aspects of the recovery process may be delayed. Reducing opioid consumption without compromising analgesia is of paramount importance, and enhanced recovery pathways have generated considerable interest given their ability to facilitate this. Our group's process for reducing opioid consumption for cesarean delivery patients evolved over time. We first demonstrated that providing additional incisional pain control with continuous bupivacaine infusions through wound catheters, with the concurrent use of neuraxial morphine, reduced postoperative opioid use. Iterations of an enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) delivery pathway were then implemented after the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology's consensus statement for ERAC was issued to eliminate variability in both hospital course and in the treatment of postoperative pain. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we sought to identify whether adding ERAC protocols to our existing combination of neuraxial morphine and wound soaker catheters further reduced opioid consumption after cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of cesarean deliveries from 2015 through 2020 was performed. Deliveries were divided by analgesic pathway into four time-periods - time-point 1 [January 2015-April 2016, previous standard of care (control, N = 61)]: neuraxial morphine in addition to as needed opioid and non-opioid analgesics; time-point 2 [May 2016-May 2019, introduction of wound soaker (wound-soaker, N = 40)]: continuous wound catheter infusions of local anesthetic, neuraxial morphine in addition to as needed opioid and non-opioid analgesics; time-point 3 [May 2019-December 2019, wound soaker + early ERAC pathway (early ERAC, N = 78)]: continuous wound catheter infusion of local anesthetic, neuraxial morphine, in addition to scheduled non-opioid analgesics (acetaminophen and ibuprofen) every 6 h, alternating in relation to one another so that one is given every 3 h; time-point 4 [January 2020-July 2020, wound soaker + late ERAC pathway (late ERAC, N = 57)]: continuous wound catheter infusion of local anesthetic, neuraxial morphine in addition to non-opioid analgesics scheduled together every 6 h (to facilitate periods of uninterrupted rest). Cumulative and average daily opioid use for postoperative days (POD) 1-4 were analyzed using ANOVA and a mixed effect model, respectively.

RESULTS

Average daily opioid consumption and total cumulative opioid consumption POD 1-4 (morphine milligram equivalents) for both early and late ERAC groups (23.9 ± 31.1 and 29.4 ± 35.1) were significantly reduced compared to control and wound soaker groups (185.1 ± 93.7 and 134.8 ± 77.1) (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of ERAC protocols to our standardized multimodal analgesic regimen (local anesthetic wound infusion catheters and neuraxial morphine) for cesarean delivery significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption.

Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery is a protocolized approach to perioperative care, with the aim to optimize maternal recovery after surgery. It is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, including decreased length of hospital stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, complications, increased maternal satisfaction, and increased breastfeeding success. However, the pace and enthusiasm of adoption of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery internationally has not yet been matched with high-quality evidence demonstrating its benefit, and current studies provide low- to very low-quality evidence in support of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. This article provides a summary of current measures of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, and optimal measures of inpatient and outpatient postpartum recovery. We summarize outcomes from 22 published enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies and 2 meta-analyses. A variety of disparate metrics have been used to measure enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, including process measures (length of hospital stay, bundle compliance, preoperative fasting time, time to first mobilization, time to urinary catheter removal), maternal outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, complications, opioid consumption, satisfaction), neonatal outcomes (breastfeeding success, Apgar scores, maternal-neonatal bonding), cost savings, and complication rates (maternal readmission rate, urinary recatheterization rate, neonatal readmission rate). A core outcome set for use in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies has been developed through Delphi consensus, involving stakeholders including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, patients, and a midwife. Fifteen measures covering key aspects of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery adoption are recommended for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies. The use of these outcome measures could improve the quality of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Using evidence-based evaluation guidelines developed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group, the Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR) was identified as the best patient-reported outcome measure for inpatient postpartum recovery. Advances in our understanding of postpartum recovery as a multidimensional and dynamic construct have opened new avenues for the identification of optimum patient-reported outcome measures in this context. The use of standardized measures such as these will facilitate pooling of data in future studies and improve overall levels of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Larger studies with optimal study designs, using recommended outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures, will reduce variation and improve data quality to help guide future recommendations.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery on postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize perioperative care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to holistically investigate the effect of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries on postoperative pain experience.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prepost study comparing subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain before and after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary team and included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative components, with emphasis on preoperative preparation, hemodynamic optimization, early mobilization, and multimodal analgesia. All individuals undergoing cesarean delivery, whether scheduled, urgent, or emergent, were included. Demographic, delivery, and inpatient pain management data were obtained through medical record review. Of note, 2 weeks after discharge, patients were surveyed about their delivery experience, analgesic usage, and complications. The primary outcome was inpatient opioid use.

RESULTS

The study included 128 individuals, 56 in the preimplementation cohort and 72 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery cohort. Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. The survey response rate was 73% (94/128). Opioid use in the first 48 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group than the preimplementation group (9.4 vs 21.4 morphine milligram equivalents 0-24 hours after delivery [P<.001]; 14.1 vs 25.4 morphine milligram equivalents 24-48 hours after delivery [P<.001]) with no increase in either average or maximum postoperative pain scores. Individuals in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group used fewer opioid pills after discharge (10 vs 20; P<.001). Patient satisfaction and complication rates did not change after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries decreased both inpatient and outpatient postpartum opioid use without increasing pain scores or decreasing patient satisfaction.

Enhanced recovery for cesarean delivery leads to no difference in length of stay, decreased opioid use and lower infection rates

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to report surgical outcomes for cesarean delivery (CD) patients following the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway based on the ERAS Society recommendations. The primary outcome for which the study was powered was the length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This IRB-approved cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary-care labor and delivery unit and utilized a pre-post intervention design. Our ERAS for CD protocol was designed using the ERAS Society recommendations and implemented globally for every patient admitted to the labor and delivery unit including both scheduled and unscheduled cases. The study was designed to have at least 85% power to detect a 6-h difference in length of stay (LOS) between the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, assuming a standard deviation of 18 h. A total of 339 records were included for data analysis, 170 in the pre-intervention cohort and 169 in the post-intervention cohort. To assess the difference between groups with respect to the primary outcome of LOS, linear regression was used with and without adjusting for covariates. Differences in dichotomous secondary outcomes were assessed using binary logistic regression. Differences in continuous secondary outcomes were assessed via a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Individual components of protocol adherence were compared using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Mean LOS was 80.5 ± 22.9 h and 82.3 ± 28.0 h, pre- and post-intervention respectively. There was no difference in LOS between the 2 cohorts (difference of means = 1.8 h; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-3.7, 7.3); p = .51). Cesarean procedure infection decreased from 11.8% pre-intervention to 5.3% post-intervention, corresponding to a 58% decrease in odds of cesarean procedure infection (odds ratio (OR)=0.42; 95% CI: (0.19, 0.96); p = .04). Inpatient opioid use also significantly decreased in the post-intervention cohort with a median MME per 12 h-period of 5.1 (25^th percentile = 2.2, 75^th percentile = 7.8) pre-intervention and 3.3 (25^th percentile = 1.0, 75^th percentile = 7.6) post-intervention (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support the implementation of an ERAS for CD protocol based on ERAS Society recommendations as evidenced by the statistically significant decrease observed in both procedure-related infection rates and inpatient opioid use. We did not find a significant difference in LOS, which leaves room for further investigation into factors that impact LOS after CD.

Use of Scheduled Nonopioid Analgesia to Decrease Inpatient Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To compare opioid use and pain scores in women who had scheduled cesarean birth before and after implementing a scheduled nonopioid analgesia practice guideline.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project with a comparison of pre-/postintervention.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

A 170-bed community hospital where the administration of postcesarean pain medications was unstandardized.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of 175 individuals who were scheduled for cesarean birth (106 in preintervention group and 69 in postimplementation group).

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

All participants had received a dose of 150 mcg of intrathecal morphine intraoperatively. Care of participants in the postimplementation group included a new practice guideline using preoperative oral acetaminophen 1 g and postoperative intravenous ketorolac 30 mg that transitioned to ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 6 hours until discharge. Acetaminophen 1 g every 6 hours also continued until discharge. For breakthrough pain, oxycodone 5 mg to 10 mg was available.

RESULTS

Results were analyzed using the chi-square and t test. There was a statistical difference in the mean milligram morphine equivalent consumed after scheduled cesarean birth (preintervention = 21.15 vs. postintervention = 3.91, p < .001). Postimplementation, 84.1% of participants did not consume any opioids beyond the intrathecal dose compared to 47.2% of participants preintervention. Mean pain scores decreased from 2.49 to 1.62 (p < .001), and there was an observed decrease of the highest reported pain score from 5.39 to 4.03 (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this project support the current literature indicating that the administration of a scheduled nonopioid multimodal analgesia regimen to individuals with scheduled cesarean birth is an effective postoperative pain management strategy. This approach to managing surgical birth pain can decrease subjective reports of pain and overall opioid consumption during the hospital stay.

Opioid dispensing after Cesarean delivery in British Columbia: a historical cohort analysis from 2004 to 2019

Purpose

To describe postdischarge opioid dispensing after Cesarean delivery (CD) in 49 hospitals in British Columbia (BC) and assess opportunities for opioid stewardship.

Methods

Using the BC Ministry of Health’s Hospital Discharge Abstract Database, we linked 135,725 CDs performed in 2004–2016 and 30,919 CDs performed in 2017–2019 (length of stay ≤ four days) by deidentified Personal Health Numbers to data on medications dispensed from all BC community pharmacies (PharmaNet). We excluded patients with cancer and those to whom opioids have been dispensed in the year before. We measured trends in annual percentages of patients dispensed opioids within seven days (opioid rate), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), stratified by hospital and opioid type, adjusted for length of stay, and for autocorrelation within hospital using generalized linear modeling.

Results

The opioid dispensation rate dropped from 31% (95% CI, 30 to 33) in 2004 to 16% (95% CI, 15 to 17) in 2016, where it remained through 2019. Five hospitals showed steep reductions from over 40% to under 10% within two to three years, but in most hospitals the opioid dispensation rate decreased slowly—11 had little reduction and three showed increases. Codeine dispensing dropped from 31% in 2004–2008 by 4% per year, while tramadol and hydromorphone dispensing rose. After 2015, rates were stable (hydromorphone, 8%; tramadol, 6%; codeine, 3%; and oxycodone, 0.5%).

Conclusion

After Health Canada’s 2008 warning against codeine use by breastfeeding mothers, post-CD opioid dispensing declined disjointedly across BC hospitals. Rates did not decrease further after the opioid overdose epidemic was declared a public health emergency in BC in 2016. The present study highlights opportunities for quality improvement and opioid stewardship through monitoring using administrative databases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-022-02271-8.

Impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery on maternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis explores the impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) on maternal outcomes.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases (Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and CINAHL) in October 2020 without date limiters, for studies quantitatively comparing ERAC implementation to a control group. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay and secondary outcomes included time to mobilization and time to urinary catheter removal, opioid consumption, readmission rates and cost savings. Mean differences and odds ratios (MD and OR with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated. Levels of evidence were assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 17,607 patients (9693 without ERAC and 7914 with ERAC) were included. ERAC was associated with reduced: length of hospital stay (MD -0.51 days [-0.94, -0.09]; p = 0.018; I2 = 99%), time to first mobilization (MD -11.05 h [-18.64, -3.46]; p = 0.004; I2 = 98%), time to urinary catheter removal (MD -13.19 h [-17.59, -8.79]; p < 0.001; I2 = 97%) and opioid consumption (MD -21.85 mg morphine equivalents [-33.19, -10.50]; p = < 0.001; I2 = 91%), with no difference in maternal readmission rate (OR 1.23 [0.96, 1.57]; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%). Three studies reported cost savings associated with ERAC. The GRADE levels of evidence were rated as low or very low quality for all study outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ERAC is associated with reduction in length of stay, times to first mobilization and urinary catheter removal and opioid consumption. ERAC does not significantly affect maternal hospital readmission rates following discharge. Further studies are required to determine which ERAC interventions to implement and which outcomes best determine ERAC efficacy.

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been adopted in some maternity units and studied extensively in cesarean section (CS) in the last years, showing encouraging results in clinic practice. However, the present evidence assessing the effectiveness of ERAS for CS remains weak, and there is a paucity in the published literature, especially in improving maternal outcomes. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for CS. Methods: A systematic literature search using Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was carried out up to October 2020. The appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies applying ERAS for patients undergoing CS were included in this study, comparing the effect of ERAS protocols with conventional care on length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid use, and cost of hospitalization. All statistical analyses were conducted with the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Ten studies (four RCTs and six observational studies) involving 16,391 patients were included. ERAS was associated with a decreased LOS (WMD -7.47 h, 95% CI: -8.36 to -6.59 h, p < 0.00001) and lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.68, p < 0.00001). Moreover, pooled analysis showed that postoperative pain score (WMD: -1.23, 95% CI: -1.32 to -1.15, p < 0.00001), opioid use (SMD: -0.46, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.34, p < 0.00001), and hospital cost (SMD:-0.54, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.45, p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the conventional care group. No significant difference was observed with regard to readmission rate (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.54, p = 0.62). Conclusions: The available evidence suggested that ERAS applying to CS significantly reduced postoperative complications, lowered the postoperative pain score and opioid use, shortened the hospital stay, and potentially reduced hospital cost without compromising readmission rates. Therefore, protocols implementing ERAS in CS appear to be effective and safe. However, the results should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited number and methodological quality of included studies; hence, future large, well-designed, and better methodological quality studies are needed to enhance the body of evidence.

A Narrative Review on Perioperative Pain Management Strategies in Enhanced Recovery Pathways-The Past, Present and Future

Effective pain management is a key component in the continuum of perioperative care to ensure optimal outcomes for surgical patients. The overutilization of opioids in the past few decades for postoperative pain control has been a major contributor to the current opioid epidemic. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been repeatedly shown to significantly improve postoperative outcomes such as pain, function and satisfaction. The current review aims to examine the history of perioperative MMA strategies in ERAS and provide an update with recent evidence. Furthermore, this review details recent advancements in personalized pain medicine. We speculate that the next important step for improving perioperative pain management could be through incorporating these personalized metrics, such as clinical pharmacogenomic testing and patient-reported outcome measurements, into ERAS program.

Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends

Purpose of Review

What are the latest enhanced recovery elements for cesarean delivery?

Recent Findings

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) provides an evidenced-based system to improve maternal outcomes, functional recovery, maternal-infant bonding, and patient experience. Postsurgical recovery has evolved from a one-dimensional pain score to a holistic multidimensional approach emphasizing faster functional recovery. ERAC involves multidisciplinary efforts of the anesthesiologist, obstetrician, nursing, hospital, and patient. Components of ERAC include preoperative patient education, limited fasting, carbohydrate load, limiting opioids intra- and postoperatively, using scheduled non-opioid analgesics and supplementing with advanced therapies for women at higher risk for pain. ERAC protocols reduce opioid consumption, reduce length of stay, and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Summary

Implementing ERAC standardized care will likely be the most important change you can make in your practice to improve outcomes, improve quality care, help address racial disparities, and minimize opioid exposure and potential for addiction.

Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesic Outcomes in Patients Maintained on Methadone and Buprenorphine: A Retrospective Investigation

Background

Despite the increasing prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant women, there are limited studies on their anesthesia care and analgesic outcomes after cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods

Patients with OUD on either buprenorphine or methadone maintenance therapy who underwent CD at our institution from 2011 to 2018 were identified. Anesthetic details and analgesic outcomes, including daily opioid consumption and pain scores, were compared between patients maintained on buprenorphine and methadone. Analgesic outcomes were also evaluated according to anesthetic type (neuraxial or general anesthesia) and daily buprenorphine/methadone dose to determine if these factors impacted pain after delivery.

Results

A total of 146 patients were included (buprenorphine n=99 (67.8%), methadone n=47 (32.2%)). Among all patients: 74% had spinal/CSE, 15% epidural, and 11% general anesthesia. Anesthesia types were similar among buprenorphine and methadone patients. For spinal anesthetics, intrathecal fentanyl (median 15 µg) and morphine (median 100 µg) were commonly given (97.2% and 96.3%, respectively), and dosed similarly between groups. Among epidural anesthetics, epidural morphine (median 2 mg) was commonly administered (90.9%), while fentanyl (median 100 µg) was less common (54.5%). Buprenorphine and methadone groups consumed similar amounts of oxycodone equivalents per 24 hours of hospitalization (80.6 vs 76.3 mg; p=0.694) and had similar peak pain scores (8.3 vs 8.0; p=0.518). Daily methadone dose correlated weakly with opioid consumption (R=0.3; p=0.03), although buprenorphine dose did not correlate with opioid consumption or pain scores. General anesthesia correlated with greater oxycodone consumption in the first 24 hours (median 156.1 vs 91.7 mg; p=0.004) and greater IV PCA use (63% vs 7%; p<0.001) compared to neuraxial anesthesia.

Conclusion

Patients on buprenorphine and methadone had similar high opioid consumption and pain scores after CD. The anesthetic details and analgesic outcomes reported in this investigation may serve as a useful reference for future prospective investigations and aid in the clinical care of these patients.