1
|
Kim HJ, Ahn E, Kim GH, Noh JH, Bang SR. Impact of perioperative COVID-19 infection on postoperative complication in cesarean section using Korean National Health insurance data. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16001. [PMID: 38987620 PMCID: PMC11237102 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66901-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The vulnerability during pregnancy has raised concerns about the potential impact of COVID-19 on obstetric anesthesia, an essential aspect of maternal care during cesarean section procedures. To evaluate the influence of COVID-19 infection on obstetric anesthesia during cesarean section, we analyzed the data from Korean National Health Insurance System (NHIS). This retrospective study utilized data from Korean NHIS. We included patients admitted with operation codes specific to cesarean section between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. We classified patients into a COVID (+) group with a diagnosis code (U071) 30 days around surgery and a COVID (-) group without the code in the same period. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality that was defined as death within 30 days of admission due to any causes. Secondary outcomes were pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], pulmonary thromboembolism [PTE], or unexpected postoperative mechanical ventilation), ICU admission, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction [MI], other thromboembolic events, surgical site infection, sepsis, acute renal failure [ARF], and hepatic failure. Among 75,268 patients who underwent cesarean section, 107 had a COVID-19 diagnosis code, while 75,161 did not. After 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM), 535 patients were included in each group. 30-day mortality showed no significant differences between the two groups both before and after PSM. The COVID (+) group demonstrated significantly elevated rates of pneumonia, ARDS, PTE, and surgical site infection both before and after PSM. Hospital length of stay and admission costs were also significantly longer and higher, respectively, in the COVID (+) group before and after PSM. In subgroup analysis, no differences were observed in mortality and postoperative complications based on the anesthesia method after matching. COVID-19 infection is associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, including pneumonia, ARDS, PTE, surgical site infection, longer hospital stays, and increased admission costs, in patients who underwent cesarean section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Jin Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-Ro, Gwangmyeong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - EunJin Ahn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-Ro, Gwangmyeong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - Gunn Hee Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, 04564, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Hyun Noh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, 01757, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Ra Bang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110, Deokan-Ro, Gwangmyeong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Güneş HY, Keskin ME. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the circadian rhythm of cesarean section deliveries. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38358. [PMID: 38787977 PMCID: PMC11124710 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Circadian rhythms synchronize all biological functions, enabling humans to foresee and respond better to periodic environmental changes. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown regulations significantly changed the lighting conditions in pregnant women, leading to chronological disruption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 on the circadian rhythm of cesarean deliveries. We investigated whether the circadian rhythm of cesarean section deliveries changed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary hospital in Van Province, eastern Turkey. We analyzed the distribution of birth times for 1476 cesarean deliveries performed between March 01, 2020 and January 20, 2021 (1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic) and compared this information with data from 1194 cesarean deliveries performed during a similar period in the previous year. The primary outcome was the change in the circadian rhythm of cesarean deliveries. Secondary outcomes included cesarean section (CS) delivery rates, indications for CS, 1st and 5th minutes Appearance (skin color), Pulse (heart rate), Grimace (reflex irritability), Activity (muscle tone), and Respiration scores, and anesthesia technique use rates. Regarding the time distribution of CS deliveries in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the maximum number of cesarean deliveries (n = 234, 16%) occurred between 14:00 and 16:00 (P = .112). Cesarean deliveries in pre-COVID-19 group were most frequently performed between 10:00 and 12:00, at a rate of 18% (n = 216) (P = .001). In both groups, the time point at which CS deliveries were the least performed was 04:00 to 06:00, and the rates were different (n = 35, 2% and n = 14, 1%, respectively) (P = .022). A 4-hour phase shift was detected at the peak of the birth time in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the previous year. These results suggest that the circadian rhythm of cesarean deliveries is affected by the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haci Yusuf Güneş
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Tuşba, Van, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Emin Keskin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Tuşba, Van, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fierro G, Milan B, Bettinelli S, Bottari E, Bugada D, Roncagliolo I, Arosio M, Farina C, Lorini FL. Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2023; 3:49. [PMID: 38017591 PMCID: PMC10685510 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-023-00135-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic infection has always been considered a relative contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia, despite the fact that infectious complications are relatively uncommon. Pregnancy-related physiological changes and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) neurotropic features may facilitate the virus' entry into the central nervous system. The principal aim of this study was to test the safety of spinal anesthesia in "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2)-positive pregnant women and to examine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics. METHODS We conducted a prospective observational single-center study in asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic consecutive pregnant SARS-CoV-2 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Women with severe infection were excluded because they underwent general anesthesia. At the time of spinal anesthesia, we collected CSF samples, and then we performed a chemical-physical analysis to look for signs of inflammation and for SARS-CoV-2 genome. RESULTS We included 26 women. No spinal anesthesia complications were reported in the perioperative period and after 2 months. All CSF samples were crystal clear, and all physical-chemical values were within physiological ranges: the median concentration of CSF/plasma glucose ratio was 0.66, IQR 0.5500 (0.6000-0.7100), and the average CSF protein concentration value was 23.2 mg/dl (SD 4.87). In all samples, genomes of SARS-CoV-2 and other neurotropic viruses were not detected. CONCLUSIONS Spinal anesthesia was safe in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women with mild disease; no clinical maternal complications were detected, and no CSF changes indicative of inflammatory or infectious diseases that would compromise the safety of the procedure were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Fierro
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Barbara Milan
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy.
| | - Silvia Bettinelli
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Elisa Bottari
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dario Bugada
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ilaria Roncagliolo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Arosio
- Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Biobank, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudio Farina
- Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Luca Lorini
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamada EJ, Petró GDS, Rohden GB, Marques CT, Schwarzbold AV, Backes DS. Safety of spinal anesthesia in pregnant vaccinated with one or two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine: A retrospective observational cohort study. PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT 2023; 32:100323. [PMID: 37260912 PMCID: PMC10199485 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcorm.2023.100323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the safety of spinal anesthesia in pregnant women who underwent cesarean section during the Covid-19 pandemia and were immunized with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods Historical cohort study that included three groups: non-vaccinated pregnant with no history of acute or previous Covid-19 [NV (n = 70)], vaccinated with one dose [1D (n = 65)] or two doses of BNT162b2 [2D (n = 45)], who underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Variables with normal distribution were analyzed with ANOVA. When one or more groups had non-normal distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. For categorical variables, the chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. When any variable had a frequency of less than five, the two-tailed Fisher's exact test with the Freeman-Halton extension was used. The significance level considered was p < .05. Results Apparently there is no interaction between BNT162b2 and the drugs most commonly used in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Performing spinal anesthesia in patients immunized with BNT162b2 does not seem to result in significant differences in outcomes compared to those not vaccinated. Apparently there is no need to change the standards of performing spinal anesthesia in patients vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo J Yamada
- Mestrado Profissional em Saúde Materno Infantil, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria-RS, Brazil. CET Manoel Alvarez, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (HUSM), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Gabriel dS Petró
- CET Manoel Alvarez, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (HUSM), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Guilherme B Rohden
- CET Manoel Alvarez, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (HUSM), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Clandio T Marques
- Mestrado Profissional em Saúde Materno Infantil, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Alexandre V Schwarzbold
- Chief of Clinical Research Unity (UPC), Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (HUSM), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Dirce S Backes
- Mestrado Profissional em Saúde Materno Infantil, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chilaka VN, Navti O, Opoku A, Okunoye GO, Babarinsa I, Odukoya OA, Bako A, Sulaiman AKP, Mohan M. Managing Labour in Women with COVID-19. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3980. [PMID: 37373674 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Since first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, COVID-19 caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Corona virus2 (SARS CoV-2) quickly spread to become a pandemic that has caused significant morbidity and mortality. The rapidity of the spread of the virus and the high mortality at the outset threatened to overwhelm health systems worldwide, and, indeed, this significantly impacted maternal health, especially since there was minimal experience to draw from. Experience with Covid 19 has grown exponentially as the unique needs of pregnant and labouring women with COVID-19 infection have become more evident. Managing COVID-19 parturients requires a multidisciplinary team consisting of anaesthesiologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, nursing staff, critical care staff, infectious disease and infection control experts. There should be a clear policy on triaging patients depending on the severity of their condition and the stage of labour. Those at high risk of respiratory failure should be managed in a tertiary referral centre with facilities for intensive care and assisted respiration. Staff and patients in delivery suites and operating rooms should be protected by enforcing infection protection principles such as offering dedicated rooms and theatres to SARS CoV-2 positive patients and using personal protective equipment. All hospital staff must be trained in infection control measures which should be updated regularly. Breastfeeding and care of the new-born must be part of the healthcare package offered to COVID-19 parturient mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Ngozi Chilaka
- Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Weill Cornell Medicine Doha, Doha P.O. Box 24811, Qatar
| | - Osric Navti
- Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Weill Cornell Medicine Doha, Doha P.O. Box 24811, Qatar
| | - Albert Opoku
- Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Weill Cornell Medicine Doha, Doha P.O. Box 24811, Qatar
| | - Gbemisola O Okunoye
- Weill Cornell Medicine Doha, Doha P.O. Box 24811, Qatar
- Sidra Medicine Qatar, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar
- University of Health & Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Isaac Babarinsa
- Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Qatar University College of Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
| | | | - Abdulmalik Bako
- Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar, Doha 3050, Qatar
- Weill Cornell Medicine Doha, Doha P.O. Box 24811, Qatar
- Qatar University College of Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hemodynamic changes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2023; 53:103624. [PMID: 36634448 PMCID: PMC9795802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Early studies suggested that COVID-19 was associated with a higher incidence of hypotension following neuraxial anesthesia in parturients. We explored the hemodynamic response to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnant severe respiratory distress syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients, using a retrospective case-control design. METHODS We searched our electronic medical records for patients who received spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and were SARS-CoV-2 positive or recovered at delivery, and used historical and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls from two tertiary care hospitals. We compared the demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables between patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive at delivery, those who were positive during pregnancy and recovered before delivery, and controls. Analyses were stratified by normotensive versus hypertensive status of the patients at delivery. RESULTS We identified 22 SARS-CoV-2 positive, 73 SARS-CoV-2 recovered, and 1517 controls. The SARS-CoV-2 positive, and recovered pregnant patients, had on average 5.6 and 2.2 mmHg, respectively, higher post-spinal mean arterial pressures (MAPs) than control patients, adjusting for covariates. Additionally, the lowest post-spinal MAP was negatively correlated with the number of daysbetween the onset of COVID-19 symptoms and delivery in patients with hypertension (correlation -0.55, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.09). CONCLUSIONS Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy exhibit less spinal hypotension than non-infected patients. While the clinical significance of this finding is unknown, it points to important cardiovascular effects of the virus.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamed RHB, Al-Ghamdi W, Al-Marri A, Al-Abdullah B, Al-Hajji N, Al-Shaybe A. Anesthetic management of obstetric patients with COVID-19: A scoping review. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2022.2105071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Radwa Hamdi Bakr Mohamed
- Department of Quality and Development, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waad Al-Ghamdi
- Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aldanah Al-Marri
- Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bayan Al-Abdullah
- Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nebras Al-Hajji
- Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alkawthar Al-Shaybe
- Department of Anesthesia Technology, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Shelton C, Lie J, Leach S, Froud O, Verma D, Sturgess P, Sawyerr A, Desai J, Gould N, Kumari S, Sen U, Verma P, Kamath P, Koirala A, Kimber‐Craig S, Eccles J, Bewlay A, Eslam E, Radwan M, Hulgur M, Christian J, Aiyad A. Epidural labour analgesia rates during the
COVID
‐19 pandemic in the north‐west of England. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:1055-1056. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.15780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Krawczyk P, Jaśkiewicz R, Huras H, Kołak M. Obstetric Anesthesia Practice in the Tertiary Care Center: A 7-Year Retrospective Study and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric Anesthesia Practice. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11113183. [PMID: 35683567 PMCID: PMC9181341 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
There are many benefits of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in the obstetric population. We performed a retrospective analysis of anesthesia provided to obstetric patients in the tertiary care center between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on anesthetic practice. A total of 15,930 anesthesia procedures were performed. A total of 2182 (17.52%) cesarean sections (CS) required general anesthesia (GA), including 383 (3.07%) of emergency conversion from NA. NA for CS consisted of 9971 (80.04%) spinal anesthesia (SA) and 304 (2.44%) epidural anesthesia (EPI). We found a decrease in the GA rate for CS in 2020 (11.87% vs. 14.81%; p < 0.001). The conversion rate from NA to GA for CS was 2.39% for SA and 31.38% for EPI. The conversion rate from labor EPI to SA for CS increased in 2020 (3.10% vs. 1.24%; p < 0.001), as well as the SA rate for other obstetric procedures (61.32%; p < 0.001). We report 2670 NA for vaginal delivery, representing 31.13% of all vaginal deliveries. NA constituted the vast majority of obstetric anesthesia. However, we report a relatively high incidence of GA. There was a decrease in GA use in the obstetric population during the pandemic. Further reduction in GA use is possible, including an avoidable conversion from NA to GA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Krawczyk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 17, 31-501 Cracow, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Remigiusz Jaśkiewicz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Cracow, Poland;
| | - Hubert Huras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 23, 31-501 Cracow, Poland; (H.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Magdalena Kołak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 23, 31-501 Cracow, Poland; (H.H.); (M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to describe updates following initial recommendations on best anesthesia practices for obstetric patients with coronavirus disease 2019. The first surge in the United States prompted anesthesiologists to adapt workflows and reconsider obstetric anesthesia care, with emphasis on avoidance of general anesthesia, the benefit of early neuraxial labor analgesia, and prevention of emergent cesarean delivery whenever possible. While workflows have changed to allow sustained safety for obstetric patients and health care workers, it is notable that obstetric anesthesia protocols for labor and delivery have not significantly evolved since the first coronavirus disease 2019 wave.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhatia K. Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2-positive parturients across 10 maternity units in the north-west of England: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:389-397. [PMID: 35226768 PMCID: PMC9111485 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, few studies have reported anaesthetic outcomes in parturients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We reviewed the labour analgesic and anaesthetic interventions utilised in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients who had a confirmed positive test for SARS‐CoV‐2 across 10 hospitals in the north‐west of England between 1 April 2020 and 31 May 2021. Primary outcomes analysed included the analgesic/anaesthetic technique utilised for labour and caesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of maternal characteristics, caesarean birth rate, maternal critical care admission rate along with adverse composite neonatal outcomes. A positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test was recorded in 836 parturients with 263 (31.4%) reported to have symptoms of COVID‐19. Neuraxial labour analgesia was utilised in 104 (20.4%) of the 509 parturients who went on to have a vaginal birth. No differences in epidural analgesia rates were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.64–1.67; p = 0.90). The neuraxial anaesthesia rate in 310 parturients who underwent caesarean delivery was 94.2% (95%CI 90.6–96.0%). The rates of general anaesthesia were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.52). Symptomatic parturients were more likely to be multiparous (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.19–2.22; p = 0.002); of Asian ethnicity (OR 1.54, 1.04–2.28; p = 0.03); to deliver prematurely (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.47–3.19; p = 0.001); have a higher caesarean birth rate (44.5% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16–2.12; p = 0.008); and a higher critical care utilisation rate both pre‐ (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and post‐delivery (11% vs. 3.5%; OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.83–6.52; p = 0.001). Eight neonates tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 while no differences in adverse composite neonatal outcomes were observed between those born to symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers (25.8% vs. 23.8%; OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.78–1.57; p = 0.55). In women with COVID‐19, non‐neuraxial analgesic regimens were commonly utilised for labour while neuraxial anaesthesia was employed for the majority of caesarean births. Symptomatic women with COVID‐19 are at increased risk of significant maternal morbidity including preterm birth, caesarean birth and peripartum critical care admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhatia
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mahajan V, Ray A, Dhanda S, Arora S. Tweaking conventions: Use of high-flow nasal oxygen for intra-operative oxygenation in a parturient with severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Indian J Anaesth 2022; 66:541-543. [PMID: 36111098 PMCID: PMC9469001 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_83_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
13
|
Abdalla S, Joho AA. Midwives' Knowledge and Preparedness in Providing Maternity Care During COVID-19 Pandemic in Dodoma Region, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. SAGE Open Nurs 2022; 8:23779608221116695. [PMID: 35923913 PMCID: PMC9340316 DOI: 10.1177/23779608221116695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 pandemic has a high impact on the health of pregnant women and healthcare providers worldwide. Objective This study aims to assess midwives' knowledge and preparedness in providing maternity care during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A cross-sectional analytical hospital-based study that included 116 midwives, who were working in labor ward, was conducted in the Dodoma region of Tanzania from March to June 2021. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to assess the association between the categorical variables. The predictors of midwives' knowledge and preparedness were determined using binary logistic regression analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0; p < .05 was considered to be significant. Results Of the midwives studied, 63 (54.3%) had adequate knowledge about COVID-19 and only 30 (25.9%) were adequately prepared on provision of maternal care. Having diploma/bachelor level of education (AOR = 2.62, 95%CI = 1.08-6.36, p = .033), being trained on COVID-19 (AOR = 3.65, 95%CI = 1.11-12.00, p = .033) and working in urban health facilities (AOR = 3.65, 95%CI = 1.17-13.98, p = .002) were the significant determinants of midwives' knowledge on COVID-19. Working at a health center (AOR = 0.19, 95%CI = 0.03-1.32. p = .033), being trained on COVID-19 (AOR = 0.04, 95%CI = 0.01-0.14, p = .000 and having adequate knowledge on COVID-19 (AOR = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.03-1.32, p = .032) were determinants of midwives' preparedness on provision of maternal care. Conclusion Knowledge and preparedness in the provision of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic were low. Emphasis should be put on training midwives on IPC when providing maternity care. This may help in preventing the spread of infectious diseases including COVID-19 as we observed in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subira Abdalla
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health,
The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Angelina A. Joho
- Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing and Public Health,
The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Perioperative Outcomes in COVID-19 Obstetric Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:healthcare10010023. [PMID: 35052187 PMCID: PMC8774980 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) adds more challenges to the perioperative management of parturients. The aim of this study is to examine perioperative adverse events and hemodynamic stability among COVID-19 positive parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia. This prospective observational investigation was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Jordan between January and June 2021, during which 31 COVID-19 positive parturients were identified. Each COVID-19 positive parturient was matched with a COVID-19 negative parturient who received anesthesia under similar operating conditions as a control group. Of the 31 COVID-19 patients, 22 (71%) were otherwise medically free, 8 (25.8%) were emergency cesarean sections. The sensory level of spinal block after 10 min was T8 (T6–T10) among COVID-19 positive group, compared to T4 (T4–T6) among control group (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in heart rate, SBP, DBP, and MAP intraoperatively (p > 0.05). Twelve (36.4%) neonates born to COVID-19 positive patients were admitted to NICU, compared to four (11.8%) among control group (p = 0.018). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications. In conclusion, spinal anesthesia is considered a safe anesthetic technique in COVID-19 parturients, and therefore it is the anesthetic method of choice for cesarean deliveries among COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Nasr S. Impact of COVID-19 on obstetric anesthesia: a systematic review. AIN-SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY 2021. [PMCID: PMC8561368 DOI: 10.1186/s42077-021-00188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
With an increase in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) incidents around the world, it has become more important than ever to be prepared for the uncertain context of labor and delivery in obstetrics. As medical staff did not encounter such a situation previously, no prior knowledge and guidelines were present to assist them. During the care of obstetric women infected with COVID-19 as well as those who are suspected of COVID-19 infection, there are two objectives, the care of asymptomatic to severely sick pregnant and postpartum women and preventing exposure of medical professionals and others during childbirth hospitalization. The focus of this review is to provide anesthesiologists who are dealing with infected pregnant mothers with some facts or, as data is insufficient, expert opinion, with an emphasis on awareness and optimal medical obstetric anesthesia training. This review will provide possible recommendations for the obstetric anesthesiologists when treating infected obstetric women and these recommendations also help anesthesia providers to prepare themselves for future pandemics.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has presented numerous challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. The virus is highly contagious and infectious since transmission can occur via multiple routes. General measures to prevent viral transmission to patients and healthcare personnel, such as a reduction in clinical load and routine testing, must be coupled with multiple additional safety measures in perioperative services. RECENT FINDINGS Regional anesthesia preserves respiratory function and reduces aerosol-generating procedures typically associated with airway management in general anesthesia, making it the first choice for a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patient in need of surgery with anesthesia. A well thought out regional anesthetic plan, implementation of hygiene and (personal) safety measures are necessary to ensure the best possible outcome for both the patient and the healthcare staff. SUMMARY The present review addresses both practical and recommended measures for performing regional anesthesia in the pandemic, to ensure patient and staff safety, and equipment protection. Further research and evidence-based guidelines are necessary to devise an established standard of care during the current COVID-19 and possible future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Heijnen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khan A, Patrick A, Patil V, Nnochiri A, Wijayatilake S. The obstetric patient in the Covid pandemic: anaesthesia and perioperative care. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33:361-369. [PMID: 34402480 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW : The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on pregnant women, maternity services and healthcare workers. We review recent literature on the course of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy, and recommendations for treatment and service provision. RECENT FINDINGS It has been increasingly recognised that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe disease associated with COVID-19 infection. Early critical care input is crucial to guide respiratory support and techniques such as prone positioning, with a low threshold for intubation in critical illness. Timing of delivery remains a highly individualised decision. Following the RECOVERY trial, the use of a course of steroids in cases of severe COVID-19 infection has been widely adopted, and emerging guidance recommends vaccination in pregnant women. SUMMARY Rapidly emerging evidence has helped guide clinicians to identify those patients most at risk of severe disease in COVID-19 and implement early interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayub Khan
- Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Queen's Hospital
| | - Adam Patrick
- Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Queen's Hospital
| | - Vinod Patil
- Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Queen's Hospital
| | - Akobundu Nnochiri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Barking, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
P.51 What a difference a year makes! Anaesthesia for category 1 caesarean section during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021. [PMCID: PMC8186975 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
19
|
P.8 Anaesthetic outcomes in pregnancy complicated by SARS-CoV2. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021. [PMCID: PMC8186983 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
20
|
Bernstein K, Landau R. Management of maternal COVID-19: considerations for anesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:246-253. [PMID: 33867458 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe updates to pragmatic recommendations that were published during the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surge, including the current thinking about whether pregnancy worsens the severity of COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS Although a majority of pregnant women infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, pregnancy puts women at higher risk of severe COVID-19 and adverse birth outcomes. Pregnant and recently pregnant women are more likely to be admitted to intensive care units and receive mechanical ventilation than nonpregnant patients with COVID-19, although preexisting maternal comorbidities are significant risk factors.Early provision of neuraxial labor analgesia with a functional indwelling epidural catheter has been universally promoted, with the goal to reduce avoidable general anesthesia for cesarean delivery and mitigate risks for healthcare workers during airway manipulation. This recommendation, along with updated workflow models of anesthesia coverage, may contribute to a reduction in general anesthesia rates. SUMMARY Initial recommendations to provide early neuraxial labor analgesia and avoid general anesthesia for cesarean delivery have not changed over time. Although workflows have significantly changed to allow continued patient and healthcare workers' safety, clinical anesthesia protocols for labor and delivery are essentially the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyra Bernstein
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
P.38 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on anaesthetic technique for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021. [PMCID: PMC8186973 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Jan M, Bhat WM, Rashid M, Ahad B. Elective Cesarean Section in Obstetric COVID-19 Patients under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study. Anesth Essays Res 2021; 14:611-614. [PMID: 34349329 PMCID: PMC8294416 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_29_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Managing obstetric emergencies in COVID-19 pandemic is a real challenge as these patients need timely intervention to save the life of the mother and the baby. Hence, to avoid life-threatening challenges, all pregnant patients were electively admitted and tested for COVID-19 near term to anticipate the difficulties and prevent complications. Aim: Our aim was to assess the impact of COVID-19 infection on maternal morbidity and mortality as well as the effect on the neonate under spinal anesthesia. Settings and Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifteen COVID-19-positive pregnant patients in the age group of 20–40 years from July 2020 to December 2020 were electively taken for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Patients who needed emergency cesarean delivery were excluded from the study. Emergency cesarean delivery was avoided to reduce the risk of aerosol generation under general anesthesia as endotracheal intubation of COVID-19 patients poses a significant risk of viral exposure to doctors and staff. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Spinal anesthesia was given at L4–L5 intervertebral space. Demographic parameters, anesthetic and surgical parameters, and neonatal parameters were observed. Any inadvertent event was noted. Statistical Analysis: Data were expressed as mean, median, percentage, or number. Results: All pregnancies were singleton. None of the patients was converted to general anesthesia. One hundred and ten were either mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic. Five of our patients had severe symptoms and needed intensive care unit care preoperatively and postoperatively. Seven patients developed spinal hypotension and were managed by vasopressors. No significant thrombocytopenia was noted in any of our patients. None of our patients developed symptomatic thromboembolism. Vertical transmission was not reported in any of the cases. All babies were born with weight >2500 g and good APGAR score. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia for LSCS is safe and effective for obstetric anesthesia in COVID-19 both for the parturient and the newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masrat Jan
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Wasim Mohammad Bhat
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Muqtasid Rashid
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| | - Basharat Ahad
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Karasu D, Kilicarslan N, Ozgunay SE, Gurbuz H. Our anesthesia experiences in COVID-19 positive patients delivering by cesarean section: A retrospective single-center cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:2659-2665. [PMID: 33987925 PMCID: PMC8242427 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Aim Pregnancy increases susceptibility to respiratory complications of viral diseases. This study aims to evaluate our anesthesia practices in pregnant women with COVID‐19 undergoing cesarean section. Methods A total of 61 patients who underwent cesarean section and had positive Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for COVID‐19 with nasopharyngeal swabs were included in the study. Patient demographics and information about anesthesia were analyzed retrospectively from the patient medical files. Results A total of 61 parturients undergoing cesarean section that had positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR tests were assessed. General anesthesia was applied to only three patients (4.9%), while spinal anesthesia was administered to the remaining 58 patients (95.1%). The incidence of hypotension was 25.9% in the spinal anesthesia group. Forty‐one (67.2%) parturients were asymptomatic. While the rate of pneumonia in symptomatic patients was 45% (9/20), the pneumonia incidence among all SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR (+) parturients was 14% (9/61). Three (4.9%) COVID‐19 patients required intensive care in the perioperative period. The overall mortality rate was 1.6% (1/61) among parturients with COVID‐19 undergoing cesarean section, while it was 11.1% (1/9) in patients with pneumonia. Conclusion It was observed that COVID‐19 is associated with mortality in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia was safely and effectively administered in COVID‐19 parturients, especially in patients with pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derya Karasu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Nermin Kilicarslan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Seyda Efsun Ozgunay
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Hande Gurbuz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Bewlay A, Tageldin N, Knapp C, Qamar Y, Dooley A, Kamath P, Hulgur M. Decision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes for category-1 caesarean sections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1051-1059. [PMID: 33891311 PMCID: PMC8251307 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
General anaesthesia is known to achieve the shortest decision‐to‐delivery interval for category‐1 caesarean section. We investigated whether the COVID‐19 pandemic affected the decision‐to delivery interval and influenced neonatal outcomes in patients who underwent category‐1 caesarean section. Records of 562 patients who underwent emergency caesarean section between 1 April 2019 and 1 July 2019 in seven UK hospitals (pre‐COVID‐19 group) were compared with 577 emergency caesarean sections performed during the same period during the COVID‐19 pandemic (1 April 2020–1 July 2020) (post‐COVID‐19 group). Primary outcome measures were: decision‐to‐delivery interval; number of caesarean sections achieving decision‐to‐delivery interval < 30 min; and a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar 5‐min score < 7, umbilical arterial pH < 7.10, neonatal intensive care unit admission and stillbirth). The use of general anaesthesia decreased significantly between the pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 groups (risk ratio 0.48 (95%CI 0.37–0.62); p < 0.0001). Compared with the pre‐COVID‐19 group, the post‐COVID‐19 group had an increase in median (IQR [range]) decision‐to‐delivery interval (26 (18–32 [4–124]) min vs. 27 (20–33 [3–102]) min; p = 0.043) and a decrease in the number of caesarean sections meeting the decision‐to‐delivery interval target of < 30 min (374/562 (66.5%) vs. 349/577 (60.5%); p = 0.02). The incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes was similar in the pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 groups (140/568 (24.6%) vs. 140/583 (24.0%), respectively; p = 0.85). The small increase in decision‐to‐delivery interval observed during the COVID‐19 pandemic did not adversely affect neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhatia
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M Columb
- Department of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Bewlay
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - N Tageldin
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C Knapp
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - Y Qamar
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - A Dooley
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - P Kamath
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK
| | - M Hulgur
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pountoukidou A, Potamiti-Komi M, Sarri V, Papapanou M, Routsi E, Tsiatsiani AM, Vlahos N, Siristatidis C. Management and Prevention of COVID-19 in Pregnancy and Pandemic Obstetric Care: A Review of Current Practices. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:467. [PMID: 33920781 PMCID: PMC8071177 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9040467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Constant accumulation of data results in continuous updates of guidelines and recommendations on the proper management of pregnant women with COVID-19. This study aims to summarize the up-to-date information about the prevention and management of suspected/confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in obstetric patients and obstetric care during prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed for relevant English-written full-text reviews. We also included relevant guidelines and recommendations. In women with a low risk for infection and uncomplicated pregnancy, elective and non-urgent appointments should be postponed or completed through telehealth. Vaccination should be discussed and distance and personal hygiene preventive measures should be recommended. Routine ultrasound examinations should be adjusted in order to minimize exposure to the virus. Standardized criteria should evaluate the need for admission. Women with moderate/high-risk for infection should be isolated and tested with RT-PCR. The mode and timing of delivery should follow routine obstetric indications. In case of infection, glucocorticoids are recommended in critically ill pregnant women, after individualized evaluation. During labor and concomitant infection, the duration of the first two stages should be reduced as possible to decrease aerosolization, while minimization of hemorrhage is essential during the third stage. Close maternal monitoring and adequate oxygenation when necessary always remain a prerequisite. Discharge should be considered on the first or second day postpartum, also depending on delivery mode. Breastfeeding with protective equipment is recommended, as its benefits outweigh the risks of neonatal infection. Recommendations are currently based on limited available data. More original studies on infected pregnant women are needed to establish totally evidence-based protocols of care for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Argyro Pountoukidou
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Maria Potamiti-Komi
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Vrisiis Sarri
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Michail Papapanou
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Eleni Routsi
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Anna Maria Tsiatsiani
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Nikolaos Vlahos
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos Siristatidis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (M.P.-K.); (V.S.); (M.P.); (E.R.); (A.M.T.); (N.V.)
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 76, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kinsella SM. A 20-minute decision-delivery interval at emergency caesarean section using general anaesthesia: a clinically-relevant target. Anaesthesia 2021; 76:1021-1025. [PMID: 33586177 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S M Kinsella
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brennan KB, Vaida SJ. What is COVID-19 teaching us about obstetric anesthesia? Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 87:10-12. [PMID: 33538416 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.20.15374-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin B Brennan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sonia J Vaida
- Department of Anesthesiology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review is based on the latest evidence to provide a good standard of care for COVID-19 parturients and protection to healthcare givers. RECENT FINDINGS COVID-19 by itself is not an indication for cesarean section. Different publications demonstrated the efficacy of neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia for delivery. Although SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a certain neurotropism, neuraxial block was not associated with neurological damage in COVID-19 parturients, and seems as safe and effective as in normal situations. It permits to avoid a general anesthesia in case of intrapartum cesarean section. Epidural failure is a concern: it may lead to a general anesthesia in case of emergency cesarean section. Local protocols and well-trained anesthesiologists will be helpful. COVID-19 patients require special circuits and every step (transfer to and from theatre, recovery, analgesia, and so on) should be planned in advance. For cesarean section under general anesthesia, personal protection equipment must be enhanced. Postoperative analgesia with neuraxial opioids, NSAIDs, or regional blocks are recommended. COVID-19 and pregnancy increase the risk of thrombosis, so thromboprophylaxis has to be considered and protocolized. SUMMARY Anesthetic care for delivery in COVID-19 parturients should include neuraxial blocks. Special attention should be paid on the risk of thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Guasch
- Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Maternal Hospital, Hospital Universitario La Paz
| | - Nicolas Brogly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Maternal Hospital, Hospital Universitario La Paz
| | - Fernando Gilsanz
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhatia K, Columb M, Bewlay A, Eccles J, Hulgur M, Jayan N, Lie J, Verma D, Parikh R. The effect of COVID-19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section. A cross-sectional analysis of six hospitals in the north-west of England. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:312-319. [PMID: 33073371 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
At the onset of the global pandemic of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), guidelines recommended using regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in preference to general anaesthesia. National figures from the UK suggest that 8.75% of over 170,000 caesarean sections are performed under general anaesthetic. We explored whether general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section changed during the peak of the pandemic across six maternity units in the north-west of England. We analysed anaesthetic information for 2480 caesarean sections across six maternity units from 1 April to 1 July 2020 (during the pandemic) and compared this information with data from 2555 caesarean sections performed at the same hospitals over a similar period in 2019. Primary outcome was change in general anaesthesia rate for caesarean section. Secondary outcomes included overall caesarean section rates, obstetric indications for caesarean section and regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates. A significant reduction (7.7 to 3.7%, p < 0.0001) in general anaesthetic rates, risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.39-0.93), was noted across hospitals during the pandemic. Regional to general anaesthesia conversion rates reduced (1.7 to 0.8%, p = 0.012), risk ratio (95%CI) 0.50 (0.29-0.86). Obstetric indications for caesarean sections did not change (p = 0.17) while the overall caesarean section rate increased (28.3 to 29.7%), risk ratio (95%CI) 1.02 (1.00-1.04), p = 0.052. Our analysis shows that general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section declined during the peak of the pandemic. Anaesthetic decision-making, recommendations from anaesthetic guidelines and presence of an on-site anaesthetic consultant in the delivery suite seem to be the key factors that influenced this decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhatia
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University of Manchester, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M Columb
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peri-operative and Intensive Care Medicine, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Bewlay
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - J Eccles
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Oldham, UK
| | - M Hulgur
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - N Jayan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - J Lie
- Department of Anaesthesia, Burnley General Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - D Verma
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Parikh
- Department of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Practical recommendations in the obstetrical patient with a COVID-19 infection. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGÍA Y REANIMACIÓN (ENGLISH EDITION) 2020. [PMCID: PMC7539827 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
31
|
Sharma RS, Mahiswar AP, Kumar A, Talawar P, Singh GK, Purohit G. Management of Obstetric Analgesia in the Developing Countries during the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Anesth Essays Res 2020; 14:545-549. [PMID: 34349317 PMCID: PMC8294418 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_10_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease (COVID), also known as COVID-19, has brought the immense challenges for the health-care system globally. All the branches of medicine are equally involved in managing these patients. During this pandemic, care of obstetric patients in terms of obstetric analgesia becomes crucial. Hence, the purpose of this review was to draft a basic model of strategies related to the provision of safe obstetric analgesia during this coronavirus pandemic, which will assist the health-care providers across the developing countries to formulate their own protocols depending upon the resource availability. All research articles related to obstetric analgesia during the COVID-19 pandemic from January 2020 to December 01, 2020 available on PubMed, Cochrane, Google scholar, and Embase are included in this study. The keywords used for data search were "obstetric analgesia during COVID-19," "coronavirus pandemic," "Labor pain," "obstetric pain management guidelines," and "regional anesthesia during COVID-19." Eventually, our review yielded the most recentmodel for the provision of safe and effective obstetric analgesia practices during the COVID-19 pandemic across the developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Shankar Sharma
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Aditya Pal Mahiswar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Ajit Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Praveen Talawar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Girish Kumar Singh
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Gaurav Purohit
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
COVID-19 Screening Using a Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network with Generative Adversarial Network Data Augmentation. Symmetry (Basel) 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/sym12091530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 is a disease that can be spread easily with minimal physical contact. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test as a diagnostic tool to confirm COVID-19 cases. This test requires at least a day for the results to come out depending on the available facilities. Many countries have adopted a targeted approach in screening potential patients due to the cost. However, there is a need for a fast and accurate screening test to complement this targeted approach, so that the potential virus carriers can be quarantined as early as possible. The X-ray is a good screening modality; it is quick at capturing, cheap, and widely available, even in third world countries. Therefore, a deep learning approach has been proposed to automate the screening process by introducing LightCovidNet, a lightweight deep learning model that is suitable for the mobile platform. It is important to have a lightweight model so that it can be used all over the world even on a standard mobile phone. The model has been trained with additional synthetic data that were generated from the conditional deep convolutional generative adversarial network. LightCovidNet consists of three components, which are entry, middle, and exit flows. The middle flow comprises five units of feed-forward convolutional neural networks that are built using separable convolution operators. The exit flow is designed to improve the multi-scale capability of the network through a simplified spatial pyramid pooling module. It is a symmetrical architecture with three parallel pooling branches that enable the network to learn multi-scale features, which is suitable for cases wherein the X-ray images were captured from all over the world independently. Besides, the usage of separable convolution has managed to reduce the memory usage without affecting the classification accuracy. The proposed method managed to get the best mean accuracy of 0.9697 with a low memory requirement of just 841,771 parameters. Moreover, the symmetrical spatial pyramid pooling module is the most crucial component; the absence of this module will reduce the screening accuracy to just 0.9237. Hence, the developed model is suitable to be implemented for mass COVID-19 screening.
Collapse
|
33
|
Challenges in the time of COVID-19. Int J Obstet Anesth 2020; 44:100. [PMID: 32931998 PMCID: PMC7440343 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
34
|
Cook TM, McGuire B, Mushambi M, Misra U, Carey C, Lucas N, O'Sullivan E, Harrop-Griffiths W. Airway management guidance for the endemic phase of COVID-19. Anaesthesia 2020; 76:251-260. [PMID: 32839960 PMCID: PMC7461409 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
It is now apparent that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) will remain endemic for some time. Improved therapeutics and a vaccine may shorten this period, but both are far from certain. Plans must be put in place on the assumption that the virus and its disease will continue to affect the care of patients and the safety of staff. This will impact particularly on airway management due to the inherent risk to staff during such procedures. Research is needed to clarify the nature and risk of respiratory aerosol‐generating procedures. Improved knowledge of the dynamics of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and immunity is also required. In the meantime, we describe the current status of airway management during the endemic phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Some controversies remain unresolved, but the safety of patients and staff remains paramount. Current evidence does not support or necessitate dramatic changes to choices for anaesthetic airway management. Theatre efficiency and training issues are a challenge that must be addressed, and new information may enable this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital NHS Trust, Bath, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | - B McGuire
- Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital Dundee, UK
| | - M Mushambi
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - U Misra
- Department of Anaesthesia, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - C Carey
- Department of Anaesthesia, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - N Lucas
- Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - E O'Sullivan
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W Harrop-Griffiths
- Department of Anaesthesia, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Macfarlane AJR, Harrop-Griffiths W, Pawa A. Regional anaesthesia and COVID-19: first choice at last? Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:243-247. [PMID: 32532429 PMCID: PMC7254013 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amit Pawa
- Guys' and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dixon T, Bhatia K, Columb M. The SARS-CoV-2 effect: an opportunity to reduce general anaesthesia rates for Caesarean section? Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:e324-e326. [PMID: 32624184 PMCID: PMC7303628 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
37
|
Kwok S, Pandya S. Caesarean section anaesthesia : technique and failure rate over a 10-year period – what has changed? SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 2020. [DOI: 10.36303/sajaa.2020.26.4.2450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Kwok
- Leicester General Hospital, US
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Guasch E, Brogly N, Manrique S. Practical recommendations in the obstetrical patient with a COVID-19 infection. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 67:438-445. [PMID: 32814634 PMCID: PMC7351396 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
La infección por COVID-19 afecta también a las pacientes obstétricas. La atención obstétrica habitual ha continuado a pesar de la pandemia. Existen series de casos de pacientes obstétricas. Parece que las técnicas neuroaxiales son seguras y es importante asegurarse que los bloqueos funcionen correctamente antes de una cesárea. Es por esto que se recomienda que los bloqueos sean realizados por anestesiólogos expertos. La protección y seguridad de los profesionales es un punto fundamental y, en caso de anestesia general, también se recomienda acudir al anestesiólogo más experto. Las pacientes gravemente enfermas deben reconocerse rápida y precozmente, para poder suministrarles el tratamiento adecuado lo antes posible. La susceptibilidad a las trombosis hace que la anticoagulación profiláctica sea prioritaria.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Analgesia, Epidural/methods
- Analgesia, Epidural/standards
- Analgesia, Obstetrical/standards
- Anesthesia, General
- Anesthesia, Obstetrical/standards
- Anesthesiologists
- Betacoronavirus
- COVID-19
- Cesarean Section/methods
- Cesarean Section/standards
- Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology
- Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control
- Coronavirus Infections/transmission
- Cross Infection/prevention & control
- Female
- Humans
- Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control
- Monitoring, Physiologic/methods
- Monitoring, Physiologic/standards
- Pandemics/prevention & control
- Patient Isolation/standards
- Personal Protective Equipment
- Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
- Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control
- Pneumonia, Viral/transmission
- Postoperative Care/methods
- Postoperative Care/standards
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severity of Illness Index
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Guasch
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España.
| | - N Brogly
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - S Manrique
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cadoni S, Ishaq S, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Neumann H, Kuwai T, Uedo N, Parra-Blanco A, Mulder CJ, Binmoeller KF, Leung FW. Covid-19 pandemic impact on colonoscopy service and suggestions for managing recovery. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E985-E989. [PMID: 32617403 PMCID: PMC7314656 DOI: 10.1055/a-1196-1711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aim As the post-peak phase of the epidemic is approaching, there is an urgent need of an action plan to help resume endoscopy activity. To manage the Covid-19 pandemic-imposed backlog of postponed colonoscopy examinations, an efficient approach is needed. The practice of on-demand sedation with benzodiazepines and/or opiates will allow most patients to complete a water-aided examination with minimal or no sedation. Other methods reported to minimize patient discomfort during colonoscopy can be used, in addition to water-aided techniques. Unsedated or minimally sedated patients who do not require recovery or require a shorter one allow rapid turnaround. The practice obviates the need for assistance with deep sedation from anesthesiologists, who may be in short supply. Trainee education in water-aided colonoscopy has been demonstrated to confer benefits. This review provides some insights into the impact of Covid-19 on endoscopy services, challenges ahead, and possible solutions to help recovery of colonoscopy work and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Cadoni
- CTO Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Sauid Ishaq
- Russell Hall, Dept. of Gastroenterology, Birmingham, United Kingdom,Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Gastroenterology, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Portsmouth University Hospital, Dept. of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Helmut Neumann
- University Medical Center Mainz, Interventional Endoscopy Center, I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Germany
| | - Toshio Kuwai
- National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Gastroenterology, Kure, Japan
| | - Noriya Uedo
- Osaka International Cancer Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka, Japan
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Gastroenterology, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris J.J. Mulder
- VU University Medical Center, Dept. of Gastroenterology, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | | | - Felix W. Leung
- Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, California, United States,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Medicine, North Hills, California, United States.
| |
Collapse
|