The clinical relevance of orthognathic surgery on quality of life

Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillofacial symmetry improvement following orthognathic surgery in patients with asymmetrical jaw deformities

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the three-dimensional changes in maxillofacial morphology following orthognathic surgery using 3D-CT in patients with asymmetrical jaw deformities.

METHODS

The subjects were 30 patients with asymmetrical jaw deformities. Three-dimensional images taken preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively were re-aligned using image processing software with the horizontal plane, coronal plane, and midsagittal plane as reference axes. Thirty-nine measurements including 28 distances, nine angles, and two volumes were recorded, and differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements and percentage differences between paired measurements on the deviated and unevolved sides were calculated.

RESULTS

Translational and rotational movements of the maxillary dentition and mandibular body and the mandibular ramus internally rotating contributed to improved symmetry of the maxillofacial morphology, but the degree and proportion of these changes varied from case to case and mild asymmetry remained even after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-CT analysis of maxillofacial morphology is essential to accurately evaluate the asymmetry of hard and soft tissue morphology in the maxillofacial region and the degree of improvement after orthognathic surgery, and the tooth movement during preoperative orthodontic treatment should be determined taking into account the movement of the upper and lower jaws during orthognathic surgery.

The use of ChatGPT and Google Gemini in responding to orthognathic surgery-related questions: A comparative study

AIM

This study employed a quantitative approach to compare the reliability of responses provided by ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Gemini in response to orthognathic surgery-related questions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors adapted a set of 64 questions encompassing all of the domains and aspects related to orthognathic surgery. One author submitted the questions to ChatGPT3.5, ChatGPT4, and Google Gemini. The AI-generated responses from the three platforms were recorded and evaluated by 2 blinded and independent experts. The reliability of AI-generated responses was evaluated using a tool for accuracy of information and completeness. In addition, the provision of definitive answers to close-ended questions, references, graphical elements, and advice to schedule consultations with a specialist were collected.

RESULTS

Although ChatGPT-3.5 achieved the highest information reliability score, the 3 LLMs showed similar reliability scores in providing responses to orthognathic surgery-related inquiries. Moreover, Google Gemini significantly included physician recommendations and provided graphical elements. Both ChatGPT-3.5 and -4 lacked these features.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Gemini can provide reliable responses to inquires about orthognathic surgery. However, Google Gemini stood out by incorporating additional references and illustrations within its responses. These findings highlight the need for an additional evaluation of AI capabilities across different healthcare domains.

Investigation of orthognathic surgery indicators-combination with index of orthognathic functional treatment needs (IOFTN) and maxillofacial morphometric analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine orthognathic surgery indicators for Japanese patients with jaw deformities using both Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Needs (IOFTN) and maxillofacial morphometric analysis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects were 89 patients treated with orthognathic surgery and 92 patients treated with orthodontic treatment alone, and were classified as class I, II, or III according to the ANB angle. Based on the results for IOFTN and the results of cephalometric analysis, the indication criteria for orthognathic surgery were examined.

RESULTS

In IOFTN analysis, none of patients in the orthognathic surgery group were classified as category 1 or 2, while 48% of the patients in the orthodontic treatment group were classified as category 4 or 5. The results of the cephalometric analysis of patients in classified categories 4 and 5 showed that the orthognathic surgery group had significantly greater lateral mandibular deviation in Class I cases, significantly more severe degree of mandibular retrusion in Class II cases, and significantly more severe degree of mandibular prognathism in Class III cases. The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that IOFTN was a common variable as an indication criterion for orthognathic surgery, and several different variables were also selected from the cephalometric measurements in each group.

CONCLUSION

IOFTN is a highly sensitive and useful indicator as a criterion for orthognathic surgery. However, in the choice of treatment strategy, maxillofacial morphometric analyses and the patient's desired goal are important.

Preventive Measures for Safer Orthognathic Surgery: Key Points

Objectives: The aim of this article is to review safer orthognathic surgery. Methods: The literature survey was performed in PubMed, EBSCO, UpToDate, ProQuest Central databases of Kırıkkale University, and Google and Google Scholar databases. Results: Patients with dentofacial skeletal defects may benefit from orthognathic surgery, which entails surgically modifying parts of the facial skeleton to restore the right anatomic and functional relationship. Careful investigation of the soft tissue via clinical examination and supporting pictures, evaluation of the structure via standardized radiographs, and evaluation of the dental via study dental casts are all necessary to successfully correct maxillofacial abnormalities. Orthognathic surgery can involve either the maxilla, the mandible, or both. Improving the dynamics of nasal airflow may necessitate simultaneous intranasal surgery consisting of septoplasty and reduction of the inferior turbinate. In some patients, a genioplasty and neck liposuction may be recommended to enhance the final result. Le Fort I osteotomy, Le Fort II osteotomy, Le Fort III osteotomy, maxillary segmental osteotomies, sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus, vertical Ramal osteotomy, inverted L and C osteotomies, and mandibular body segmental osteotomies are all examples of well-established osteotomies that can be used to reposition facial skeletal elements and redefine the face. Conclusion: Preventative strategies for risk-free orthognathic surgery include maintaining blood flow, shielding teeth, bone, and neurovascular systems, and bolstering the patient's diet.

Accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured three-dimensional device for condylar positioning in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (clinical trial)

INTRODUCTION

Aligning dental arches in orthognathic treatment after undergoing LeFort I osteotomy or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) relies on occlusal splints, which do not provide precise control over the condylar head.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To clinically and radiographically assess the accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured (CAD/CAM) surgical guide for condylar positioning in a BSSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study recruited 8 patients with a non-syndromic dentofacial deformity who underwent a BSSO. Surgery was planned according to CAD/CAM technology. After osteotomy, a pre-operative guide was used, followed by a repositioning guide. Computed tomography scans were conducted on all patients 1 week pre-operatively, immediately, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The data are presented as median values with the 25th and 75th percentiles. Eight patients (37.50% females and 62.50% males) between the ages of 19 and 24 underwent BSSOs. The surgical procedure successfully corrected their skeletal deformities. The absolute change between immediate postoperative and pre-operative condylar angle was 0.15 (0.00-0.3). The absolute change between 3 months postoperative and pre-operative condylar angle was 0.20 (0.00-0.30).

CONCLUSION

The stability of the condylar head in position is well assessed by 3-dimensional condylar positioning devices designed and manufactured by CAD/CAM technology in the mandibular BSSO.

Anthropometric and laboratory parameter alterations following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery on patients' anthropometric measures and laboratory parameters. This study was conducted on patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Anthropometric measurements were collected before surgery (T0) and at intervals of one week (T1), two weeks (T2), one month (T3), and three months (T4) postoperatively, and laboratory parameters at T0 and T4. Data analysis included repeated-measures ANOVA for assessing weight changes, body mass index (BMI) and fat percentage changes, the Friedman test for muscle mass changes, and independent t tests to understand gender-based differences. Significant reductions were observed in weight (mean differences ranging from 2.26 kg to 3.84 kg, 95.00% CI: 1.29 to 4.62, p < 0.01) and BMI (mean differences ranging from 0.76 to 1.32, 95.00% CI: 0.38 to 1.58, p < 0.01) postoperatively at all follow-up points. Fat percentage changes were significant between T0 - T3 (MD = 1.17, 95.00% CI: 0.26 to 2.08, p < 0.05) and T0 - T4 (MD = 1.28, 95.00% CI: 0.14 to 2.43, p < 0.05). Changes in muscle mass were significant until T3 (MD ranging from 71.00 to 107.0, p < 0.01). Also, haemoglobin levels were significantly higher at T0 than T4 (MD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0 to 0.7). These changes showed no significant gender-based differences (p > 0.05). Our study showed that orthognathic surgery prompts temporary changes in body weight, Body Mass Index, and haemoglobin levels. Future research should explore interventions to mitigate these changes and enhance postoperative recovery.

Changes in occlusion after orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to systematically review and identify the changes of occlusion in patients after orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

The protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and was registered to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42021253129. Studies included were Original articles only, Additionally, studies were included if the outcome of occlusal force was measured pre- and postoperatively and if occlusal forces resulted from a long follow-up of a minimum of 1 year following orthognathic surgery using adequate measurement tools. Non-English articles, case reports, case series, and non-original articles, including systematic reviews and literature reviews, were excluded.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded a total of 978 articles. Of the 978 articles, 285 were duplicates. After reading the titles and abstracts, 649 articles were excluded, and full-text articles of the remaining 47 studies were reviewed independently by two authors for eligibility wherein 33 articles were excluded, because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 14 studies were processed for critical review.

CONCLUSION

The occlusal force increased after orthognathic surgery, although not to the level of the control group; however, the maximal bite force remained unchanged. Immediately after orthognathic surgery, chewing and swallowing forces increased. Significant reductions in the postoperative occlusal contact pressure areas was also observed.

Three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla using novel intermediate splints in maxilla-first orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III deformity

OBJECTIVES

Successful orthognathic surgery requires accurate transfer of the intraoperative surgical plan. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the surgical error of a novel intermediate splint in positioning the maxilla during maxilla-first orthognathic surgery and (2) determine factors influencing surgical error.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study examined 83 patients who consecutively underwent Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of skeletal class III deformity using a novel intermediate splint and a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Surgical error was the outcome variable, measured as the difference in postoperative translational and rotational maxillary position from the virtual plan. Measures included asymmetry, need and amount for mandibular opening during fabrication of intermediate splints, and planned and achieved skeletal movement.

RESULTS

Mean errors in translation for vertical, sagittal, and transversal dimensions were 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, respectively; degrees in rotation for yaw, roll, and pitch were 0.8 ± 0.6, 0.6 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively. The transverse error was smaller than sagittal and vertical errors; error for pitch was larger than roll and yaw (both p < 0.001). Error for sagittal, transverse, and roll positioning was affected by the achieved skeletal movement (roll, p < 0.05; pitch and yaw, p < 0.001). Surgical error of pitch positioning was affected by planned and achieved skeletal movement (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the novel intermediate splint when performing Le Fort I osteotomy allowed for accurate positioning of the maxilla.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The novel intermediate splint for maxillary positioning can be reliably used in clinical routines.

Patient Satisfaction Following Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Objective

This study is intended to review data pertaining to patient satisfaction following orthognathic surgery through a systematic literature survey.

Methods and Materials

An electronic search was done on Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases. The inclusion criteria considered were as follows: (1) assessment of patients' satisfaction, (2) one-stage orthognathic surgery, and (3) follow-up period of 8 weeks or more in English literature. The exclusion criteria considered were as follows: (1) presence of craniofacial syndromes, cleft lip and palate or traumatic injuries, (2) previous facial surgery, and (3) psychological problems before surgery. The data were extracted and analyzed under three categories: function, esthetics and overall satisfaction.

Results

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Esthetic and function were improved in majority of patients; however, it was not possible to assess the overall satisfaction levels statistically. Overall satisfaction analysis revealed that 70-87% of patients were satisfied, while nearly 15% of patients were dissatisfied with the treatment outcome.

Conclusion

Most of the patients were satisfied with the surgical outcome. However, satisfaction seemed to be multifactorial and it was not possible to predict satisfaction prior to the surgery.

Latest Evidence on Orthognathic Surgery Techniques and Potential Changes in Oral Microbiota related to Intermaxillary Fixation in Orthodontic Patients: A Systematic Review

Background:

Orthognathic surgery is often applied for the correction of facial dysmorphia, and different findings were highlighted regarding the techniques applied. After surgical treatment, intermaxillary fixation is placed, which compromises oral hygiene and, consequently, can lead to increased plaque accumulation and microbiological changes, promoting the proliferation of periodontopathogenic bacteria. Therefore, the aims of the present review are to describe the main evidence from the last 20 years of clinical studies concerning surgical techniques applied to orthognathic surgery and, finally, to analyze potential changes in the oral microbiota.

Materials and Methods:

An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus databases; the MeSH (Medical Subject Heading) terms are bacteria, dental plaque, evidence-based practice, maxillomandibular fixation, microbiota, operative procedures, and orthognathic surgery.

Results:

At the end of the search process, 31 relevant articles were finally included and analyzed in this systematic review, which has a low risk of bias. Clinical studies on humans have been considered in this review. Based on the studies included it would be preferable to use piezoelectric technology in osteotomies because of its many advantages, “surgery-first” technique allows for results comparable to the standard technique in Class III malocclusions while improving quality of life more rapidly, the “mandible-first” technique seems to have more advantages than the “maxilla-first” technique, Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) could provide more accurate and precise results, and finally, Laser can be applied with different advantages. Regarding intermaxillary fixation, no long-term increase in the concentration of periodontal bacteria was recorded.

Conclusion:

Several findings still need to be confirmed with reference to the best suturing technique to reconstitute the nasal wing base, the real effectiveness of “surgery-first,” “maxilla-first,” and “mandible-first” approaches in patients with Class III malocclusion, the use of CAD/CAM and Laser, more studies should be conducted to evaluate quantitative and qualitative changes in other microorganisms following intermaxillary fixation.

Translation, Transcultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Hebrew Language Version of the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire for the Assessment of Quality of Life in Orthognathic Patients

INTRODUCTION

Dentofacial deformities impose a negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Orthognathic surgery is the main pillar of treatment for these conditions and has proven its impact on the improvement of the functional and psychosocial aspects of QOL. The Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), developed by Cunningham and colleagues, is a well-established instrument for assessing QOL in patients with dentofacial deformities.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of a Hebrew version of the OQLQ.

METHODS

Transcultural adaptation was done following guidelines proposed by Beaton and colleagues resulting in a pilot study conducted on 20 patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Internal consistency, reliability, and sensitivity were evaluated by means of Cronbach alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (test-retest), and Wilcoxon test, respectively. Validity was assessed by comparing the OQLQ with the Hebrew version of the Oral Health Impact Scale-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile Scale-14) using the Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

Internal consistency showed a good correlation between domains and excellent test-retest reliability. Sensitivity to change was statistically significant in all but 3 questions. The Hebrew version of the OQLQ exhibited a strong correlation with Oral Health Impact Profile Scale-14 in total score and moderate to high correlations among domains.

CONCLUSION

The Hebrew version of the OQLQ is a valid and reliable and specific instrument to measure QOL for Hebrew-speaking patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Orthognathic Surgery as Class III Skeletal Treatment in a 31-Year-Old Female with Mandible Prognathism: A Case Report

Mandible prognathism or malocclusion skeletal class III is facial deformities. These deformities can affect orofacial function, such as mastication, speech, and function of the temporomandibular joint. Besides the physical effects of these deformities, the psychosocial impact on the individual is often essential, and such deformities can affect the quality of life and self-confidence. Orthognathic surgery is designed to correct these deformities because these deformities could not have been corrected by only orthodontic treatment. Therefore, at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, orthognathic surgery is the treatment choice for mandibular prognathism or malocclusion skeletal class III. In this case report, we present a 31-year-old female with mandibular prognathism, difficulty in closing her mouth and anterior open bite. Surgery was performed by Le Fort 1 osteotomy for advancing maxilla and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for setback mandible. Two weeks after surgery, patient came back to the orthodontic department for occlusion treatment.

What factors influence the cost of orthognathic surgery among patients in the US?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to analyze what factors influence the cost of orthognathic surgery performed within the US.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was completed using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) from 2000 to 2012 on all patients aged 14 to 20 years who had undergone orthognathic surgery. The predictor variables included patient and hospitalization characteristics. The primary outcome variable was hospital charge ($). Multivariate linear regression was conducted to determine independent predictors for increased/decreased hospital charge.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 14 191 patients (mean age, 17.4 ± 1.6 years; females, 59.2%). Each additional day in the hospital added $8123 in hospital charges (P < .01). Relative to mandibular osteotomy, maxillary osteotomy (+$5703, P < .01) and bimaxillary osteotomy (+$9419, P < .01) were each associated with increased hospital charges. Genioplasty (+$3499, P < .01), transfusion of packed cells (TPC) (+$11 719, P < .01), continuous invasive mechanical ventilation (CIMV) <96 hours (+$23 502, P < .01), and CIMV ≥96 hours (+$30 901, P < .01) were each associated with significantly increased hospital charges. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) added $6560 in hospital charges (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Maxillary osteotomy and bimaxillary surgery were each associated with significantly increased charges relative to mandibular osteotomy. Concomitant genioplasty, TPC, CIMV, and OSA each significantly increased the charges. Each additional day to the length of stay significantly increased the charges.

Does Social Media Affect a Patient's Decision to Undergo Orthognathic Surgery?

Orthognathic surgery, also known as corrective jaw surgery, is a procedure that corrects abnormalities of the jaw and face. It is used to treat malocclusions, where the teeth and jaws are misaligned. This surgery can improve the function and appearance of the jaw and face, leading to improved mastication, speech, and quality of life for the patients. To assess if social media had any effect on the patients' decision to undergo orthognathic surgery, a self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery at the Oral and Maxillofacial department through the health information system (BESTCare, 2.0A) to participate in the study. In total, 111 responses were recorded from the patients, with 107 agreeing to answer the questionnaire and 4 refusing to answer. Twitter was a source of information about orthognathic surgery for 61 patients (57%). When using a social media platform, 3 patients (2.8%) were influenced by an advertisement or an educational post on social media that presented the surgical correction of the jaws, while 15 (14%) believed that they had been somewhat influenced, and 25 (23.4%) picked their surgeon through social media. Fifty-six patients (52.3%) took the neutral position regarding whether information on social media had answered their questions and concerns regarding the surgical procedure. Social media did not influence patients' decision to undergo the procedure. Surgeons and specialists must utilize their platforms to answer any concerns or questions from any patient undergoing or having undergone this corrective jaw surgery.

Assessment of Quality of Life in Class III Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery

Objective

This study sought to evaluate the quality of life in patients with class III malocclusion and dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Materials and Methods

This study evaluated 25 patients with Angle's class III malocclusion submitted to orthognathic surgery through the application of the B-OQLQ questionnaire, over two periods: 30 days before surgery (T0) and 6 months after surgery (T1). The B-OQLQ is a specific questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformities.

Results

The average age for women was 26.11 years and for men 31.13 years. The dental discrepancy between the incisors (overjet) was on average 2.55 ± 4.36 mm. There was no correlation between overjet and the level of satisfaction after surgery. There was no statistically significant relationship between patient satisfaction and the type of surgery performed. The results revealed statistically significant differences, showing improvement in the quality of life in the postoperative period of 6 months (p < 0.05), with a positive effect in all four domains of the questionnaire.

Conclusion

Orthognathic surgery significantly improved the quality of life of patients, and the type of questionnaire used (B-OQLQ) proved to be appropriate for the proposed analysis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12663-022-01771-w.

Effectiveness of individualized 3D titanium-printed Orthognathic osteotomy guides and custom plates

BACKGROUND

Computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology was developed to improve surgical accuracy and minimize errors in surgical planning and orthognathic surgery. However, its accurate implementation during surgery remains a challenge. Hence, we compared the accuracy and stability of conventional orthognathic surgery and the novel modalities, such as virtual simulation and three-dimensional (3D) titanium-printed customized surgical osteotomy guides and plates.

METHODS

This prospective study included 12 patients who were willing to undergo orthognathic surgery. The study group consisted of patients who underwent orthognathic two-jaw surgery using 3D-printed patient-specific plates processed by selective laser melting and an osteotomy guide; orthognathic surgery was also performed by the surgeon directly bending the ready-made plate in the control group. Based on the preoperative computed tomography images and intraoral 3D scan data, a 3D virtual surgery plan was implemented in the virtual simulation module, and the surgical guide and bone fixation plate were fabricated. The accuracy and stability were evaluated by comparing the results of the preoperative virtual simulation (T0) to those at 7 days (T1) and 6 months (T2) post-surgery.

RESULT

The accuracy (ΔT1‒T0) and stability (ΔT2‒T1) measurements, using 11 anatomical references, both demonstrated more accurate results in the study group. The mean difference of accuracy for the study group (0.485 ± 0.280 mm) was significantly lower than in the control group (1.213 ± 0.716 mm) (P < 0.01). The mean operation time (6.83 ± 0.72 h) in the control group was longer than in the study group (5.76 ± 0.43 h) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This prospective clinical study demonstrated the accuracy, stability, and effectiveness of using virtual preoperative simulation and patient-customized osteotomy guides and plates for orthognathic surgery.

Impact of malocclusion treatments on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: an overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE

To perform an overview of systematic reviews (SR) assessing the impact of malocclusion treatments (Orthodontic Treatment - OT and/or Orthodontic Surgical Treatment - OST) on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search strategy was conducted in electronic databases until June 7th, 2021, followed by a manual search in grey literature and registration databases. Two independent authors applied the eligibility criteria, extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias (AMSTAR-2), and performed the certainty of evidence (GRADE) evaluation. Meta-analysis was planned to be carried out in RevMan 5.3 (with 95% confidence intervals (CI) considering p < 0.05), in case of homogeneous studies considering OHRQoL instrument and time of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 126 articles were accessed on the database, 18 registers, 33 records on grey literature and 3 articles by means of citation searching. After duplicates removal and eligibility criteria analyses, 15 SR were included. From that, 13 showed improvement in OHRQoL after OT and/or OST. The methodological quality ranges from high (n = 2), to critically low (n = 9). Meta-analysis was conducted. Improvement on OHRQoL after a 6-month OST using the OQLQ-22 (p < 0.00001; 19.65; CI: 12.60-26.70) and OHIP-14 instruments (p < 0.00001; 10.70; CI: 9.89-11.51); and after a 6-month OT using the CPQ 11-14 instrument (p = 0.010; 3.57; CI: 0.86-6.28) with very low certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most SR selected in this overview are characterized by a critically low quality, as well as very low certainty of the evidence, OT and/or OST seem to have a positive impact in improving the OHRQoL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The overview of existing systematic reviews compiled that OT and/or OST seem to have a positive impact on improving the OHRQoL. This information will facilitate clinical decision-making considering the clinical and psychological parameters.

National Trends in Orthognathic Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 6640 Patients

BACKGROUND

LeFort I osteotomy (LF1) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) have unique operative challenges and inherent anatomic considerations that predispose to certain adverse outcomes, yet their respective complication profiles continue to be debated given conflicting results from single-center investigations. The purpose of this study is to perform a multi-institutional analysis of complications, socioeconomic trends, and financial charges associated with orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of orthognathic procedures performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patients younger than 12 years of age were excluded. Medical complications, surgical complications, and admission costs were compared across procedures. Socioeconomic determinants and trends across regions of the country were also analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 6640 patients underwent orthognathic surgery, including LF1 (59.2%, n=3928), BSSO (14.4%, n=959), and double-jaw surgery (26.4%, n=1753). Patients undergoing LF1 were more likely to experience overall complications (P<0.001), infections (P<0.001), and blood transfusions (P<0.001) than those undergoing BSSO. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures than other hospitals (P<0.001), yet high-volume hospitals were less likely to have surgical complications (P=0.014). Patient admission charges related to orthognathic operations at high-volume hospitals were less than other hospitals (P<0.001). Household income was higher for orthognathic procedures performed at high-volume hospitals (P<0.001). White patients were 1.5 times more likely to choose a farther, higher volume hospital for orthognathic surgery than the one locally available (P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

LeFort I osteotomy procedures had higher infection and transfusion rates than BSSO procedures. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures, yet high-volume hospitals had fewer complications and decreased admission charges. Future study will be needed to further elucidate case-mix index details and socioeconomic determinants of health contributing to these disparities.

Distribution of orthognathic surgery among the Swedish population: a retrospective register-based study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide a nationally representative assessment of orthognathic procedures performed in hospitalised patients in Sweden and study regional differences in prevalence, demographic parameters and hospitalisation time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare's register, all the patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Outcome variables were categorised into: (1) Surgical methods and regional distribution (2) Demographic variations (3) Hospitalisation time.

RESULTS

The population-prevalence-rate of orthognathic procedures over the 5-year period was 6.3 (SD 0.4) per 100,000 persons, a regional difference in the prevalence was found. Most common were Le Fort I osteotomies (43.4%) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (41.6%), 39% of the patients had bimaxillary surgery. The majority of the surgery was performed in the age group 19-29 (68.8%). The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (SD = 0.9, range 1.7-3.4). A significant regional difference (p ≤ 0.001) was found in hospitalisation time for single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional differences in the distribution of orthognathic surgery and demographic variations were found in Sweden in 2010-2014. The underlying causes of variations are still unknown and request further investigation.

Measurement of quality of life in orthognathic surgery using an original questionnaire: About a series of 123 cases

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to measure changes in the quality of life of patients who had orthognathic surgery using an original questionnaire, designed for this purpose.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This single-center retrospective study included all patients who had orthognathic surgery in our center between 2014 and 2019. An original questionnaire comprising 13 items in 4 domains was sent to patients postoperatively by email after telephone contact and obtaining their consent. Items were scored on a 5-point scale ranging from (-1), worse than before surgery, to (+3), better than before surgery.

RESULTS

All data were collected in a standardized way. In total, 123 patients responded. The mean score for all surgeries combined was +1.14, indicating an improvement in QOL considered to be "low to moderate". A total of 118 patients (95.9%) reported an improvement following surgery, including 18 patients (14.6%) who reported a marked improvement. The greatest improvement was observed for psychosocial aspects and morphology.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a positive effect of orthognathic surgery on patients' QOL, including self-perception, relationships with others, or functional aspects as mastication and breathing. We propose an original tool that is easy to use by patients to measure quality of life following orthognathic surgery.

Perceived Age and Personality Profiling after Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that orthognathic surgery can improve facial age and personality profiling. The authors expand on these findings by assessing the role of patient facial profile and sociodemographics on perceived changes following surgery.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative images of 65 patients operated on by a single surgeon were randomly assorted and rated by 30 respondents. Patient facial profiles were categorized as convex, concave, or straight. Paired and unpaired t tests were used to assess differences preoperatively and postoperatively. Multivariate regression and post hoc receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to quantify the influence of various patient factors.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in perceived age were seen following orthognathic surgery overall (-1.31 years; p < 0.01) and in the straight (-1.10 years; p = 0.02) and convex (-1.80 years; p ≤ 0.01) subgroups. After controlling for patient sociodemographics, there were no significant differences in age change based on facial profile. Older age at the time of surgery was independently associated with greater perceived age changes ( p = 0.04); older patients (>26.5 years, determined by receiver operating characteristic curve) experienced greater net decreases in perceived age in comparison to younger patients (-2.0 years versus -1.2 years; p < 0.01). Improvements were seen in overall attractiveness ( p < 0.01) and in each tested personality characteristic following surgery ( p < 0.01). These differences were not significantly associated with different patient sociodemographics or facial profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' data add to the growing base of evidence that orthognathic surgery improves patient-perceived age and personality. Significant decreases in perceived age are more likely to be gained by patients undergoing surgery at an older age.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Patients with Dentofacial Deformities Class II and III after Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Our aim was to assess the impact of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment on patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) according to type of dentofacial deformities, by synthesizing the available evidence.

METHODS

Search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The eligibility criteria were studies that measured OHRQoL before-after orthognathic surgery, with results disaggregated by Class II and III. Two researchers independently performed the selection process, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Meta-analysis of the standard mean differences (SMD) was performed using random effect models.

RESULTS

The search identified 1047 references. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and four were included in the meta-analysis. The SMD of OHRQL global score showed large improvement 4-7 months after surgery in Class II and III patients (2.09, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.49 and 1.96, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.70, respectively). The sensitivity analyses, excluding studies with weak methodological quality, showed that Class III patients' improvement in functional limitation was significantly higher than in Class II patients (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.12-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to support differences between Class II and III patients in the OHRQoL impact after orthognathic surgery, but findings suggest lower improvement of some domains in Class II patients.

Changes in health-related quality of life after orthognathic surgery: a multicenter study

Objective

To evaluate changes in general and oral health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery, and whether these changes vary according to type of deformity.

Material and methods

This is a prospective longitudinal multicenter study of patients with dentofacial deformities (n = 90). The Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and Short-Form Health Survey version2 (SF-36v2) were self-completed by patients before surgery, 3 and 6 months after orthognathic surgery. Change was tested using paired t-test, and compared between Class II and Class III of dentofacial deformity by unpaired t-test. The magnitude of change was examined estimating the standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

The OQLQ and OHIP-14 showed statistically significant improvements 6 months after surgery, compared with the pre-surgical evaluation, but the SF-36v2 only in the physical component summary. The SRM was large in OQLQ oral function (-1.11) and dentofacial facial aesthetics (-0.76) dimensions, and moderate in most of OHIP-14 dimensions. Differences in mean change between Class II and III were statistically significant for global scores of OQLQ (-10.08 vs -20.30, p = 0.0271) and OHIP-14 (-3.79 vs -10.56, p = 0.0144).

Conclusions

A significant improvement was observed in oral HRQoL and in the physical component of general health in patients with dentofacial deformities Class II and III after orthognathic surgery. Improvement was greater among Class III than in Class II patients.

Clinical relevance

These results provide patients, oral health care professionals, and planners with valuable information to make evidence-based decisions and facilitate shared clinical decision-making, taking into account the patients’ perspective.

One-splint versus two-splint technique in orthognathic surgery for class III asymmetry: comparison of patient-centred outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Two-jaw orthognathic surgery (OGS) is done using either the one-splint technique with free-hand positioning of the maxillomandibular complex or the two-splint technique with intermediate splints to position the maxilla. It is uncertain which technique achieves better outcomes. This study compares frontal soft tissue symmetry and subjective patient QoL between one-splint and two-splint techniques in skeletal Class III asymmetry patients undergoing OGS with three-dimensional surgical planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study comprised 34 one-splint and 46 two-splint OGS patients. Frontal photographs and Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) were done pre- and post-treatment. Frontal soft tissue symmetry was analysed with the anthropometric Facial Symmetry Index. Measurements were compared with t-tests and chi-squared tests with p-value set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The groups differed in pre-treatment ANB and OQLQ scores. The two-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures. The one-splint group showed significant improvement in all symmetry measures except midface deviation, upper contour deviation and the Facial Contour Symmetry Index. Both groups showed significant improvement in OQLQ scores. There were no significant differences in post-treatment symmetry measurements and OQLQ scores between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although two-splint technique may better improve contour symmetry, there were no significant differences in frontal soft tissue symmetry and QoL after OGS in skeletal Class III asymmetry with either one-splint or two-splint technique, with both techniques resulting in significant improvement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

One-splint and two-splint surgical techniques produce similar patient-centred outcomes in Class III asymmetry patients.

Two- and Three-Segment Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The literature shows no consensus on whether two- or three-segment surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion is the best operative technique.

METHODS

The present clinical trial was designed to compare the outcome of two- and three-segment osteotomy surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Thirty-two adult patients with transverse maxillary deficiency greater than or equal to 5 mm were randomly assigned to two- and three-segment groups (n = 16). Dimensional and psychological assessments (Oral Health Impact Profile and Brazilian Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire) were carried out before surgical intervention and at one of the following time points: completion of expansion, removal of expanding device, 6 months after completion of expansion, or 10 months after completion of expansion. Dimensional assessments for asymmetric expansion of the maxilla and for changes in the area and volume of the palatine vault were performed on digital data from tomographic and laser scanning with the aid of an engineering inspection software.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in asymmetry or stability outcomes between groups. The psychological benefit provided by the three-segment technique did not spread through the domains of the quality-of-life questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that three-segment surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion outcomes do not exceed those obtained with its two-segment counterpart regarding symmetry of maxillary expansion and stability of area and volume of the palatine vault. Furthermore, psychological nuances evidenced in two- and three-segment groups with the tools used play a limited, short-lasting role, or a specific, more sensitive assessment tool needs to be developed.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Sleep, Distressed Appearance, and Quality of Life Relate to Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to identify factors correlating with satisfaction with orthognathic surgery in order to improve its outcome.

METHODS

We recruited 77 participants who had received orthognathic surgery and 32 age- and gender-matched normal-controls. Questionnaires that included devised questions for family support, Big Five Inventory, Derriford Appearance Score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and a visual analogy scale for satisfaction, were completed before and one month and nine months after the surgery. The statistical analysis methods included descriptive statistics, t-test, and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

All participants received the preoperative and one-month follow-up, while 28 also completed the nine-month follow-up. Satisfaction was not significantly related to demographic data, but long-term satisfaction was related to an extraverted personality. The preoperative and postoperative results of the Derriford Appearance Scale were related to short-term and long-term satisfaction. Furthermore, both the preoperative and one-month postoperative Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index findings were significantly related to short-term satisfaction. The postoperative 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was significantly related to short-term and long-term satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only subjective distress and dysfunction of appearance but also sleep problems and quality of life were correlated to satisfaction with orthognathic surgery. In the future, relevant interventions can be developed to further improve patient's satisfaction and their physical and mental health.

Do the stages of orthodontic-surgical treatment affect patients' quality of life and self-esteem?

The orthodontic-surgical treatment comprises different stages from diagnosis to final soft tissue accommodation, but there are no data regarding the patient's perception during these phases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these stages on quality of life and self-esteem of patients with dentofacial deformity. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the treatment stage: initial orthodontic pre-treatment (1), one week before surgery (2), three months after surgery (3), and after the removal of the orthodontic appliance (4) (n = 20 / group). They filled the following questionnaires: Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Data were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences among groups were noticed in all evaluated scales (p = 0.001 for all). No statistically significant differences between patients in groups 1 and 2 (OHIP, OQLQ, and RSES, p >0.05 for all), while patients at group 4 presented different scores in all questionnaires compared to 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.05 for all), irrespective of the type of dentofacial deformity (p > 0.05). The results indicate that dental decompensation stage did not negatively affect patient's confidence and well-being. Despite the improvement noticed few months after the orthognathic surgery, the main impact on patient's quality of life and self-esteem was evidenced after the removal of the orthodontic appliance. We highlight the important role of counselling patients to discuss all the treatment stages to clarify patients' subjective expectations before any intervention is carried out.

Soft-Tissue Simulation for Computational Planning of Orthognathic Surgery

Simulation technologies offer interesting opportunities for computer planning of orthognathic surgery. However, the methods used to date require tedious set up of simulation meshes based on patient imaging data, and they rely on complex simulation models that require long computations. In this work, we propose a modeling and simulation methodology that addresses model set up and runtime simulation in a holistic manner. We pay special attention to modeling the coupling of rigid-bone and soft-tissue components of the facial model, such that the resulting model is computationally simple yet accurate. The proposed simulation methodology has been evaluated on a cohort of 10 patients of orthognathic surgery, comparing quantitatively simulation results to post-operative scans. The results suggest that the proposed simulation methods admit the use of coarse simulation meshes, with planning computation times of less than 10 seconds in most cases, and with clinically viable accuracy.

Short-term and Long-term Psychological Impact and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery

Background

Orthognathic Surgery (OGS) is a surgery for patients with dento-facial deformity but not all patients are satisfied with its outcome. The purpose of this study is to find out the short-term and long-term psychological impact and quality-of-life of OGS.

Methods

77 participants receiving OGS and 32 age and gender-matched controls were enrolled. The data of questionnaires were collected before OGS, one month and 9 months after OGS, including short form of the Derriford-Appearance-Scale (DAS-24), Big-Five-Inventory (BFI), Hospital-Anxiety-and-Depression-Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh-sleep-quality-index (PSQI), and 36-Item Short-Form-Health-Survey (SF-36). Variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency. Paired t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA were used to evaluate the pre-and post-surgery data.

Results

Short-term and long-term satisfaction of OGS was high. Before OGS, BFI showed the extraversion had significant difference between the male and female OGS subgroups. Several domains of DAS-24 were significantly different between the OGS and the control groups. Both groups had no significant difference in PSQI, HADS and SF-36, except sleep-efficiency. After OGS, many domains of DAS-24 were significantly improved and the improvement persisted to 9 months later. Sleep-latency, physical-function, role-limitations-due-to-physical-health and social-functioning exacerbated after OGS. Sleep-latency, physical-function, and social-functioning were improved 9 months after OGS, but sleep-efficiency and role-limitations-due-to-physical-health were still significantly worse than controls.

Conclusion

People received OGS for unfavorable appearance and the surgery could decrease their distress of appearance and impact to their daily living. Through long-term assessment, we should pay attention to sleep problems and role-limitations-due-to-physical-health after OGS.

Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles

PURPOSE

An increasing number of articles on orthognathic surgery are published every year. This paper aims to provide a list of the top 100 cited articles on orthognathic surgery to help any professional level with interest in this topic and to map the trends of orthognathic surgery publications over time.

METHODS

A bibliographic search (retrospective study) following STROBE guidelines was performed on Google Scholar (GS) and Dimensions with the term "orthognathic surgery" in the title, abstract, and keywords. The number of citations, citations per year, authors, and publication year were evaluated. A ranking was created in GS citations order with the top 100 cited articles and variables discussed individually. A graphical illustration of keywords was created using VOSviewer. These steps are fundamental in creating this list and relating it to all published articles on the topic.

RESULTS

A helpful list of the top 100 articles was developed to help professionals in entirely different manners. Virtual planning and complications in orthognathic surgery were the most cited topics, with a 95% confidence interval (P < .05). Some curiosities are discussed, such as increasing interest in surgery first and the relation between airway/obstructive sleep apnea and orthognathic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bibliometric and altmetric analysis for free using Google Scholar and Dimensions is laborious but possible. Bibliometrics is a powerful tool to become actualized at any health professional level, from students to academics; and could save considerable effort and time for parties interested in the topic. Appropriate keywords are a crucial step to wider article dissemination.

Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life and comparison of patients' postoperative experience after single- and double-jaw surgery: a longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life (QoL) and to compare single- and double-jaw surgeries in terms of ratio and patient perceptions of the postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, longitudinal observational study was conducted. The short form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) were applied preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL). Additionally, patient perceptions of the immediate postoperative period were assessed at the first and fourth week after surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive patients were recruited and assigned to the single-jaw group (n = 24) or the double-jaw group (n = 76) according to the characteristics of each facial or occlusal deformity. The questionnaires showed lower scores for both groups after surgery, indicating significant benefits to OHRQoL. The whole sample OHIP-14 mean total scores decreased from 10.5 to 2.8 (P < .001, d = 1.35), whereas OQLQ showed a decrease from 48.4 to 11.6 (P < .001, d = 1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthognathic surgery can improve OHRQoL, and long-term benefits outweigh the risks and discomfort associated with the treatment.

The impact of a surgery-first approach on oral health-related quality of life

Orthognathic surgery using a surgery-first approach (SFA) has been shown to result in better quality of life (QoL) throughout the treatment duration; however, the effects of gender, age and type of dentofacial deformity on SFA-related QoL remain unknown. In total, 228 consecutive patients underwent SFA for correction of dentofacial deformities (skeletal class III, bimaxillary protrusion and facial asymmetry). We assessed their QoL before surgery and at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery using the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ). The results indicated a significant decrease in the total OQLQ, facial aesthetics and social aspect domain scores 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Among all domains, the greatest improvement was noted in the facial aesthetics domain. The oral function scores declined significantly immediately after surgery, but improved significantly 6 and 12 months after surgery; however, the awareness scores remained relatively stable. At each time point, women and the bimaxillary protrusion group exhibited a significantly higher total and specific domain scores. Patients aged 18-22 years exhibited lower total and four specific domain scores than older patients. Thus, QoL improves in all aspects, except awareness domain, by 12 months after SFA, but gender, age, and type of dentofacial deformity affect this improvement.

Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this clinical analysis was to evaluate intraoperative and early postoperative complications as well as late findings and the overall patient satisfaction following orthognathic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, 119 patients after orthognathic surgery were included. Surgical approaches were single bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO (n = 52)), single LeFort-I osteotomy (n = 5) and bimaxillary osteotomy (LeFort-I + BSSO (n = 62)). Intraoperative and early (0-4 weeks postoperative) complications were investigated retrospectively (n = 119), whereas late findings and quality of life were assessed via clinical follow-up and survey (mean: 59 months postoperative) on 48 patients.

RESULTS

Bad split (n = 4/114) was the most common intraoperative complication followed by one case of severe bleeding. Regarding early postoperative complications, temporary damage of the inferior alveolar nerve after BSSO was most common (n = 33/114), followed by facial nerve dysfunction (n = 3), failed osteosynthesis (n = 2) and one case of postoperative dyspnoea. Permanent hypaesthesia of the lower lip was the most prevalent (n = 28/45^{(BSSO and LeFort-I + BSSO)}) late finding with varying extent, followed by temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) (n = 25/48). Skeletal relapse mostly occurred after class II treatment, followed by class III, posterior crossbite and open bite. Overall, the surgery improved the patients' self-perception (85.4%), with 60.4% of patients opting for surgery again.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term complications after orthognathic surgery occurred more frequently than commonly described in the literature, and analyses of the quality of life show the need for more comprehensive preoperative patient education.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Hypaesthesia of the lower lip presented less as complication but rather as side effect following BSSO. As orthognathic surgery is mostly elective, preoperative patient education is of pivotal importance and should include proactive risk stratification.

Cephalometric and Anthropometric Changes and Their Relation to Patients' Satisfaction After Orthognathic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the correlation between cephalometric and anthropometric facial changes and satisfaction level of class III patients after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Totally, 29 class III patients (mean age = 24.23 ± 4.2) undergoing one-piece Lefort 1 osteotomy and mandibular setback were included. Pre- and postoperative lateral cephalograms were taken. Thirteen cephalometric and 17 anthropometric facial measurements were evaluated. A 6-item questionnaire of Rustemeyer's study was used to assess patient's satisfaction after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, paired sample t test and Spearman's correlation analysis were used as statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Facial aesthetic and masticatory improvement was highly significant (P < 0.001), while opinion differences between patients and relatives/friends were not significant (P = 0.334). Increased upper lip length (P = 0.037) and decreased nasal tip protrusion-nose height index (P = 0.017) correlated positively with aesthetic improvements after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although the association between parameters and satisfaction questionnaire was found, other influential factors should be considered before surgery as well.

Does facial appearance of dentofacial deformity influence the need for orthognathic surgery: The Malaysian perception

Aim: This study evaluates perception toward facial appearance in dentofacial deformity and the need for orthognathic surgery among the public with and without dental backgrounds. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 12 facial photographs of cases with dentofacial deformity or malocclusion in varying severity was used. A hundred individuals were selected to answer the questionnaire. The perception of facial appearance (FAS), treatment need score (TNS), and knowledge regarding dentofacial deformity were used for the evaluation. Results: Significant differences were found between dental and non-dental when the respondents' knowledge in all the questionnaire items ([Formula: see text].05) was assessed. However, no significant difference was found in the mean of FAS and TNS in all the presented cases (normal, borderline, severe). Pearson correlation between perceived FAS and TNS was statistically negative for severe and normal cases, whereby a decrease in FAS for severe cases showed an increase in TNS, and an increase in FAS for normal cases showed a decrease in TNS. Conclusion: Respondents with dental background had sound knowledge of dentofacial deformity. A poorly attractive respondent with dentofacial deformity showed a greater need for orthognathic surgery.

Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life of patients with dentofacial deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with dentofacial deformity. This systematic review was performed through the survey of observational studies that had evaluated the impact of orthognathic surgery on the QoL of patients with dentofacial deformity. The article databases included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The risk of bias was analysed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. The meta-analysis was performed considering the exposure before and after orthognathic surgery using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) versus the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ). A total of 2,263 articles were identified. Twelve studies remained in the qualitative synthesis and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The impact of QoL both preoperatively and postoperatively with the OHIP-14 questionnaire was 7.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62 to 13.65; p = 0.01) and the OQLQ questionnaire was 20.53 (95% CI = 14.27 to 26.79; p < 0.0001). Overall impact of QoL was 16.01 (95% CI = 10.50 to 21.52; p < 0.0001), which showed that orthognathic surgery has an influence on the QoL. Orthognathic surgery generates positive impact on the QoL of patients with dentofacial deformity.

Global Interest in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Analysis of Google Trends Data

PURPOSE

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) has an expansive scope, with myriad diagnoses treated by practicing surgeons. Patients and referring providers are increasingly turning to Web-based sources to find information about clinical conditions before consultations or in conjunction with ongoing care. The purpose of this study was to examine the current trends of public interest of OMS procedures as assessed by online search trends.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study of Internet search data obtained via Google Trends (GT; Alphabet, Mountain View, CA) was conducted. Data were collected using GT for OMS-related search terms between January 2004 and May 2019. The search terms used in the analysis were "wisdom teeth," "TMJ," "dental implants," "jaw surgery," "jaw fracture," "facial trauma," and "facial cosmetic surgery," defined to be the core surgical aspects of OMS based on public awareness campaigns sponsored by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Relative search volumes, trends over time, geographic trends, and seasonal trends were analyzed. For all analyses, P ≤ .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Overall search volume trends for OMS procedures showed an increase over time, with seasonal and geographic trends. "Wisdom teeth" was the most searched term and had the greatest increase in search volume over time. "Facial trauma" was the least searched term, with no appreciable trend over time. Geographic search volume was greatest in the United States. Seasonal changes were most apparent with searches for "wisdom teeth" and "jaw surgery."

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of GT data shows substantial interest in core OMS procedures, with seasonal variations noted for certain areas of practice (third molars and jaw surgery) and consistent interest in other areas (facial cosmetic surgery, dental implant reconstruction, and temporomandibular disorders). The use of GT data may be a powerful tool for predicting demand for OMS services and for public education campaigns.

Investigate the oral health impact and quality of life on patients with malocclusion of different treatment needs

Background

This study compared oral health impacts and QoL among patients with different malocclusion types and a normal population by using self-report questionnaires.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 214 healthy adults were divided into 3 groups: (1) Normal, control group; (2) ORTHO, patients who received orthodontic treatment; and (3) OGS group, patients who received orthognathic surgery (OGS). The timing of measurement were at the initial stage of the orthodontic therapy and before surgery. Two questionnaires and one additional item were used: the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for QoL, the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) for oral health-related QoL (OHRQOL) and one additional item for aesthetic evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used to compare the 3 groups. The effects of 3 malocclusion types, gender, age, and facial asymmetry in the OGS group were also evaluated.

Results

The ORTHO and OGS groups had higher negative impacts than did the Normal group in the OHIP-14, but not much difference in the SF-36. The item of aesthetics related to oral health impact was the lowest in the OGS group. The patients in the ORTHO group with a Class II malocclusion were most dissatisfied in the SF-36 and OHIP-14. In the OGS group, the women dissatisfied in the OHIP-14 and the aesthetic. The older patients had higher negative impacts in the OHIP-14 than the younger patients. The patients with facial asymmetry did not suffer higher negative impacts than did the patients with a symmetrical face in the SF-36 and OHIP-14.

Conclusions

The majority of the patients who required orthodontics or OGS reported a higher negative impact in the OHIP-14 compared with the normal controls, but not in the SF-36. Class II malocclusion suffered from highest psychological stress and aesthetic sensitivity than the other two subgroups in the ORTHO group.

Impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on quality of life: a meta-analysis

Background

Orthognathic surgery involves a change in the patient’s functional and aesthetic aspects.

Objective

The objective was to answer the following focused question: what is the impact on quality of life (QoL; aesthetic, function, social, and psychological aspects) in patients undergoing orthodontic-surgical treatment?

Search methods

Appropriate word combinations and truncations were selected and tailored specifically for each electronic database: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and gray literature.

Selection criteria

Studies that met the following criteria was included: patients with dentofacial deformity (P); surgical correction through orthodontic-surgical treatment (E/I); before orthodontic-surgical treatment or patients with no dentofacial deformity (C); QoL (O); cross-sectional, cohort, case-control and randomized or non-randomized clinical trial (S).

Data collection and analysis

In phase 1, two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of all references. All articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In phase 2, the same reviewers completely read the selected articles independently.

Results

A total of 2879 articles were retrieved during the final database search. Fifty-two articles were selected for full reading, of which 16 were excluded, resulting in 36 included articles. The meta-analysis was performed using 13 of the selected studies. When comparing the period before any treatment with the post-operative period of 4–8 weeks, there was an association only for facial aesthetics (mean difference = 3.00; 95 per cent confidence interval = 1.10–4.89; inconsistency index = 63 per cent). The comparison between the period before any treatment with the 6 month post-operative period showed an improved QoL in all of the domains evaluated and, when comparing data after the orthodontic-surgical preparation (before surgery) and after 5–12 months of surgery, there was also statistical significance with an increased QoL for all of the domains evaluated.

Conclusions

In conclusion, based on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, the evidence suggests an improvement in the QoL of patients undergoing orthodontic-surgical treatment regarding aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological aspects.

Registration

CRD42017069495

Difference in Degrees of Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontic Treatment between Skeletal Class III and Cleft Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the degrees of satisfaction with orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment between skeletal Class III and cleft patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The samples consisted of Class III group (N = 25) and Cleft group (N = 16). The Modified Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaires, which had 5 domains (oral function [OF], awareness of dentofacial deformity [ADD], social relationship [SR], facial esthetics [FE], and nose/lip esthetics [NLE]), were evaluated with 5 rates (0 [very satisfactory] to 4 [very unsatisfactory]) at initial visit (T1), just before surgery (T2), 3 to 6 months after surgery (T3), and at debonding or 1 year after surgery (T4). The scores at each stage, amount of change between stages, and effect size (ES) in the 5 domains were investigated.

RESULTS

Compared to Class III group, Cleft group exhibited lower satisfaction scores of NLE domain during all stages (all P < 0.001) and of SR domain and total domains at T4 stage (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Cleft group showed significant improvement of satisfaction scores in FE domain during T1-T2 (P < 0.01), in SR, FE, NLE, and total domains during T2-T3 (all P < 0.01), in OF, SR, and total domains during T3-T4 (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.01), and in all domains during T1-T4 (ADD, P < 0.05; OF, SR, and NLE, P < 0.01; FE and total, P < 0.001). Cleft group exhibited large improvement of ES only at SR and FE domains during T2-T3 (-0.81 and -1.09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to lower satisfaction of NLE domain at all stages in cleft patients, clinicians should recommend adjunctive cosmetic surgery for nose and lip after completion of treatment.

Impacts of Orthognathic Surgery on Patient Satisfaction, Overall Quality of Life, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Literature Review

Several treatments have been suggested to correct dentofacial abnormalities, including orthognathic surgery. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the impact of orthognathic surgery on patient satisfaction, overall quality of life, quality of life related to oral health—and to orthognathic surgery in particular—among adult patients. Two investigators independently reviewed the available literature in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE, Trip, and Google Scholar (gray literature) based on the keywords “orthognathic surgery” and “quality of life.” An analysis of bias was performed based on the MINORS (methodological index for nonrandomized studies). A total of 245 relevant studies were retrieved from the databases, and 6 additional studies were located after a manual search of the references. Following selection based on titles, abstracts, and full-text analysis, 30 studies were included in the present systematic review. To evaluate quality of life before and after orthognathic surgery, 12 studies applied the surgery-related Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), 12 used the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and 4 used the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Orthognathic surgery results in improvements in quality of life both physically and psychosocially after surgery and is associated with high rates of patient satisfaction.

Impact of surgical orthodontic treatment on quality of life in Chinese young adults with class III malocclusion: a longitudinal study

Background

The quality of life in Class III malocclusion patients are worse than those without the disorder and previous studies have shown that surgical orthodontic treatment has a different effect on these patients compared with mild or moderate malocclusion. This study aimed to investigate the changes in quality of life in patients with Class III malocclusion during surgical orthodontic treatment in Chinese young adults.

Methods

The 14-item Short Form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), and the 22-item Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) were used to assess the effect of surgical orthodontic treatment on the quality of life in 21 patients with Class III malocclusion at pre-treatment (T₀), pre-surgical orthodontic treatment (6 to 8 months, T₁) and post-surgical orthodontic treatment (6 to 8 months after surgery, T₂), and 24 healthy individuals were included as controls. The comparisons in numerical variables between patients and controls were performed using Mann-Whitney U test. The scores of the two questionnaires between T₀, T₁, T₂ and controls (Tc) were compared using generalized estimating equation.

Results

According to OHIP-14 questionnaire, the mean scores in T₀ and T₁ were higher than those in T₂ and Tc (P < 0.001), and a significant decrease was observed after post-surgical orthodontic treatment (P < 0.001), which achieved a level similar to the control group (P > 0.05). As to OQLQ questionnaire, the mean scores of all domains showed a significant increase between T₀ and T₁ except for awareness of dentofacial aesthetics (P > 0.05) and social aspects of dentofacial deformity (P > 0.05), followed by a significant decrease between T₁ and T₂.

Conclusion

Surgical orthodontic treatment may improve quality of life in patients with Class III malocclusion, but pre-surgical orthodontic treatment may have an adverse effect on quality of life.