Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis

Comparative Study of Mandible Ramus Morphology Using 3-dimensional CT in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relevance of the external morphology of the mandibular ramus, internal bone tissue structure, and maxillofacial morphology at the site for sagittal split ramus osteotomy among different facial skeletal patterns. A total of 80 patients with jaw deformities who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on facial skeletal type (skeletal Class II or skeletal Class III). A further 7 patients with no skeletal abnormalities were established as the control group (skeletal Class I). Computed tomography images obtained from these patients were 3-dimensionally reconstructed and the morphology of the mandibular ramus determined. Thickness at the mandibular foramen in Class II was greater than that in Class III, and showed the lowest value at the midpoint of the mandibular foramen and mandibular notch in Class I. Mandibular morphology showed change according to facial skeletal type. Correlations were also observed between the cephalometric analysis values and mandibular morphology.

Relapse tendency after BSSO surgery differs between 2D and 3D measurements: A validation study

Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) surgery is used to correct various dento-skeletal deformities. Clinical outcomes are critically dependent on accurate and proper positioning of skeletal units created by BSSO. Monitoring skeletal changes postoperatively is a major part of follow-up. Between January 2015 and December 2015, 24 patients underwent BSSO surgery without any other segmental osteotomy (mean age, 29.9 ± 14.2 [range, 17-67] years; 18 females). Cephalometric X-rays and cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the position displacement at three mandibular points at both postoperative time points using 2- and 3-dimensional analysis separately and examined the relationship between these methods. Horizontally in at least in 14/24 patients, the difference between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements was >1 mm. Vertically in at least in 16/24 patients, the difference between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements was >1 mm. A scatter plot with orthogonal regression indicated the relationships between the 2-dimensional measurement and the corresponding 3-dimensional measurement in the horizontal and vertical directions. Skeletal relapse with 2-dimensional-measurements differed significantly from the 3-dimensional measurements. There was no evidence of a relationship between the two types of measurements regarding the direction and the location of the landmarks.

A case of severe mandibular retrognathism with bilateral condylar deformities treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and two advancement genioplasty procedures

We report a case involving a young female patient with severe mandibular retrognathism accompanied by mandibular condylar deformity that was effectively treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and two genioplasty procedures. At 9 years and 9 months of age, she was diagnosed with Angle Class III malocclusion, a skeletal Class II jaw relationship, an anterior crossbite, congenital absence of some teeth, and a left-sided cleft lip and palate. Although the anterior crossbite and narrow maxillary arch were corrected by interceptive orthodontic treatment, severe mandibular hypogrowth resulted in unexpectedly severe mandibular retrognathism after growth completion. Moreover, bilateral condylar deformities were observed, and we suspected progressive condylar resorption (PCR). There was a high risk of further condylar resorption with mandibular advancement surgery; therefore, Le Fort I osteotomy with two genioplasty procedures was performed to achieve counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and avoid ingravescence of the condylar deformities. The total duration of active treatment was 42 months. The maxilla was impacted by 7.0 mm and 5.0 mm in the incisor and molar regions, respectively, while the pogonion was advanced by 18.0 mm. This significantly resolved both skeletal disharmony and malocclusion. Furthermore, the hyoid bone was advanced, the pharyngeal airway space was increased, and the morphology of the mandibular condyle was maintained. At the 30-month follow-up examination, the patient exhibited a satisfactory facial profile. The findings from our case suggest that severe mandibular retrognathism with condylar deformities can be effectively treated without surgical mandibular advancement, thus decreasing the risk of PCR.

A novel step osteotomy for correction of hemifacial microsomia - A case report

Facial asymmetry is one of the commonest facial anomalies, with reported incidence as high as 34%. Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) has an incidence of 1 in every 4000-5600 children and is one of the commonest causes of facial asymmetry. The standard treatment of HFM is orthognathic surgery by bilateral saggital split osteotomy (BSSO) or distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the mandible, both of which involve prolonged periods of occlusal adjustments by an orthodontist. Here, we present distraction of the mandible by means of a novel modified step osteotomy to correct the facial asymmetry in a case of hemifacial microsomia without disturbing the occlusion. This novel technique can prove to be a new tool in the maxillofacial surgeons armamentarium to treat facial asymmetry.

Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial

A randomized clinical trial was carried out to evaluate postoperative stability after mandibular advancements in non-syndromal class II patients with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or distraction osteogenesis (DO). In total 32 patients could be included in the BSSO group and 34 patients in the DO group. The BSSO was converted to a unilateral procedure for one patient, and two patients in the BSSO group were lost during follow-up. A total 63 patients could be evaluated, 29 in the BSSO group and 34 in the DO group. Advancement was comparable in the two groups (mean 7.2mm). The mean follow-up period was 23.8 months (range 11-50 months). Lateral cephalograms were hand-traced. Horizontal relapse was measured in Y-B (mm) and SNB (°). For DO this was -0.324 mm and -0.250°, and for BSSO this was -0.448 mm and -0.259°, respectively (both not significant; NS). Vertical relapse measured in X-B was -0.074 mm for DO and -0.034 mm for BSSO (NS). The magnitude of advancement, a high mandibular plane angle, age and gender were not identified as independent risk factors for relapse. In conclusion, a BSSO and DO gave both similar stable results in advancements of the mandible up to 10mm.

The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review

BACKGROUND

In 1953, the sagittal ramus split osteotomy was introduced by Obwegeser. For many years, and in some countries still, this technique has defined the term oral and maxillofacial surgery.

METHODS

The basic design of the sagittal ramus split surgical procedure evolved very quickly. The original operation technique by Obwegeser was shortly after improved by Dal Pont's modification. The second major improvement of the basic technique was added by Hunsuck in 1967. Since then, the technical and biological procedure has been well defined. Resolution of the problems many surgeons encountered has, however, taken longer. Some of these problems, such as the unfavorable split or the damage of the inferior alveolar nerve, have not been satisfactorily resolved.

RESULTS

Further modifications, with or without the application of new instruments, have been introduced by Epker and Wolford, whose modification was recently elaborated by Böckmann. The addition of a fourth osteotomy at the inferior mandibular border in an in vitro experiment led to a significant reduction of the torque forces required for the mandibular split.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature was reviewed, and the last modifications of the successful traditional splitting procedure are presented narrowly. It indicates the better the split is preformatted by osteotomies, the less torque force is needed while splitting, giving more controle, a better predictability of the lingual fracture and maybe less neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve.

Virtual surgical planning for treatment of severe mandibular retrognathia with collapsed occlusion using contemporary surgical and prosthodontic protocols

PURPOSE

To meet functional and esthetic needs in an older adult for treatment of complex skeletal and dentoalveolar deformities using contemporary surgical and prosthodontic protocols.

METHODS

An older adult with dentoalveolar complex and skeletal deformity (mandibular retrognathia) was treated by a combination of virtual planning and current surgical and prosthodontic protocols. Treatment planning steps and sequencing are presented.

RESULTS

Skeletal, soft tissue, and dental harmonies were attained without biological or mechanical complications. Definitive oral rehabilitation was completed with a maxillary complete denture and a mandibular metal ceramic fixed implant-retained prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

A surgical and prosthodontic team approach in combination with technologic advances can predictably optimize esthetic and functional outcomes for patients with complex skeletal and dentoalveolar deformities.

The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has been established as a useful technique in the correction of skeletal anomalies of the long bones for several decades. However, the use of DO in the management of craniofacial deformities has been evolving over the past 20 years, with initial experience in the mandible, followed by the mid-face and subsequently, the cranium. This review aims to provide an overview of the current role of DO in the treatment of patients with craniofacial anomalies.