Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning

In-house CAD/CAM fabricated repositioning guide in maxillary repositioning after Le Fort I osteotomy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two transferring methods, which are the intermediate splint made by computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and the customized maxillary repositioning guide for orthognathic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient data regarding virtual surgical simulations were collected. For analyzing the accuracy, the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography and preoperative simulation data were superimposed. The x, y, and z coordinates were obtained at three landmarks in the maxillary dentition, and the linear and angular differences between the surgical simulation and the actual surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included in this study, 16 in the splint group and 17 in the guide group. One coordinate in the guide group and nine in the splint group showed errors of >2 mm, with a statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the three-dimensional error distance at each reference point. In most measurements, the interquartile range of the guide group showed a narrower distribution than that of the splint group.

CONCLUSION

It is more advantageous to use a customized maxillary repositioning guide than an intermediate splint made via CAD/CAM to obtain an accuracy within the 2 mm discrepancy range.

Evaluation of a Fully Digital, In-House Virtual Surgical Planning Workflow for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The advantages of virtual surgical planning (VSP) for orthognathic surgery are clear. Previous studies have evaluated in-house VSP; however, few fully digital, in-house protocols for orthognathic surgery have been studied.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the virtual surgical plan and actual surgical outcome for orthognathic surgery using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This is a prospective cohort study from September 2020 to November 2022 of patients at the Victoria General Hospital in Halifax, NS, Canada who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had previously undergone orthognathic surgery or were diagnosed with a craniofacial syndrome.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variables were the mean 3-dimensional (3D) (Euclidean) distance error, as well as mean error and mean absolute error in the transverse (x axis), vertical (y axis), and anterior-posterior (z axis) dimensions.

COVARIATES

Covariates included age, sex, and surgical sequence (mandible-first or maxilla-first).

ANALYSES

The primary outcome was tested using Z and t critical value confidence intervals. The P value was set at .05. The 3D distance error for mandible-first and maxilla-first groups was compared using a 2-sample t-test as well as analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The study sample included 52 subjects (24 males and 28 females) with a mean age of 27.7 (± 12.1) years. Forty three subjects underwent mandible-first surgery and 9 maxilla-first surgery. The mean absolute distance error was largest in the anterior-posterior dimension for all landmarks (except posterior nasal spine, left condyle, and gonion) and exceeded the threshold for clinical acceptability (2 mm) in 16 of 23 landmarks. Additionally, mean distance error in the anterior-posterior dimension was negative for all landmarks, indicating deficient movement in that direction. The effect of surgical sequence on 3D distance error was not statistically significant (P = .37).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In general, the largest contributor to mean 3D distance error was deficient movement in the anterior-posterior direction. Otherwise, mean absolute distance error in the vertical and transverse dimensions was clinically acceptable (< 2 mm). These findings were felt to be valuable for treatment planning purposes when using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow.

Does curve of Spee affect the precision of 3D-printed curvature-adaptive splints?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to propose a standardized protocol for the fabrication of three-dimensionally (3D)-printed curvature-adaptive splints (CASs) and assess the precision of CASs on dentitions with different depths of the curve of Spee (COS).

METHODS

76 lower dental resin models, each exhibiting one of the four types of COS (0-, 2-, 4-, and 6-mm deep), were selected and digitally scanned. CASs were designed, 3D printed, and grouped into C0, C2, C4, and C6, corresponding to the four types of COS depths. To assess precision, the CASs occluded with the resin model were scanned as a whole and compared with the originally designed ones.

RESULTS

In terms of translational deviations observed in the CASs, the mean value of absolute sagittal deviation (0.136 mm) was significantly higher than those of vertical (0.091 mm) and transversal deviations (0.045 mm) (P < 0.01). Regarding rotational deviations of the CASs, the mean deviation in pitch (0.323°) was significantly higher than those in yaw (0.083°) and roll (0.110°) (P < 0.01). However, when comparing the accuracy of CASs across C0, C2, C4, and C6 groups, no statistically significant difference was found. Additionally, the translational deviations, rotational deviations, and RMSE of all groups were significantly lower than the clinically acceptable limits of 0.5 mm, 1°, and 0.25 mm, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The depth of the COS has no significant impact on the precision of CASs, as evidenced by the absence of statistically significant differences in translational, rotational deviations, and RMSE among all groups (C0, C2, C4, and C6). Moreover, despite relatively high deviations in the sagittal dimension and pitch, all dimensional deviations and RMSE remained statistically significantly lower than the corresponding clinically acceptable limits (CALs) in all groups.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This standardized protocol incorporating "curvature-adaptation" represents an optimized approach to fabricating diverse 3D-printed splints tailored to dentitions with different anatomical features in contemporary digital dentistry.

Virtual Versus Conventional Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of hard tissues movements planned to result of the maxillary and mandibular positions between conventional surgical planning (CSP) and virtual surgical planning (VSP) in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Methods

A systematic electronic search was carried out in six databases and gray literature with no restriction of publication date and language. Clinical observational studies that compared accuracy of maxillary position between CSP and VSP were included. Linear measurements of the mandible in the transverse plane and linear measurements of the maxilla in the vertical, horizontal and transverse planes were considered for analysis, comparing planned to postoperative outcomes of CSP and VSP. Cochrane tool was used to assess bias risk. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize similar results by using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Significance level was set at 5%.

Results

Six studies (2 RCT and 4 retrospective cohorts) were included according to inclusion and eligibility criteria, involving 255 patients. The inter-rater reliability of selection and eligibility was excellent (k = 0.8315 and k = 0.9329, respectively). Two studies presented that VSP seemed to have better results than CSP regarding linear measurements of the mandible in the transverse plane. Results from CSP and VSP were similar in accuracy for hard tissue in vertical plane of maxillary position (I2 = 0%; p = 0.17), although VSP was more accurate in horizontal plane (I2 = 0%; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

VSP presented better accuracy for transverse movements in mandible of asymmetric patients. VSP showed to be more accurate for movements in the horizontal plane, and qualitative analysis seemed to be more effective for transverse movements.

Accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured three-dimensional device for condylar positioning in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (clinical trial)

INTRODUCTION

Aligning dental arches in orthognathic treatment after undergoing LeFort I osteotomy or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) relies on occlusal splints, which do not provide precise control over the condylar head.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To clinically and radiographically assess the accuracy of computer-assisted design and manufactured (CAD/CAM) surgical guide for condylar positioning in a BSSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study recruited 8 patients with a non-syndromic dentofacial deformity who underwent a BSSO. Surgery was planned according to CAD/CAM technology. After osteotomy, a pre-operative guide was used, followed by a repositioning guide. Computed tomography scans were conducted on all patients 1 week pre-operatively, immediately, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The data are presented as median values with the 25th and 75th percentiles. Eight patients (37.50% females and 62.50% males) between the ages of 19 and 24 underwent BSSOs. The surgical procedure successfully corrected their skeletal deformities. The absolute change between immediate postoperative and pre-operative condylar angle was 0.15 (0.00-0.3). The absolute change between 3 months postoperative and pre-operative condylar angle was 0.20 (0.00-0.30).

CONCLUSION

The stability of the condylar head in position is well assessed by 3-dimensional condylar positioning devices designed and manufactured by CAD/CAM technology in the mandibular BSSO.

Enhancing skeletal stability and Class III correction through active orthodontist engagement in virtual surgical planning: A voxel-based 3-dimensional analysis

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgical correction of Class III malocclusion was investigated through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the distal and proximal mandibular segments using a 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition among virtual surgical predictions performed by the orthodontist in close communication with the maxillofacial surgeon and 12-18 months postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive secondary data analysis was conducted on deidentified preoperative (1 month before surgery [T1]) and 12-18 months postoperative (midterm [T2]) cone-beam computed tomography scans, along with virtual surgical planning (VSP) data obtained by Dolphin Imaging software. The sample for the study consisted of 17 patients (mean age, 24.8 ± 3.5 years). Using 3D Slicer software, automated tools based on deep-learning approaches were used for cone-beam computed tomography orientation, registration, bone segmentation, and landmark identification. Colormaps were generated for qualitative analysis, whereas linear and angular differences between the planned (T1-VSP) and observed (T1-T2) outcomes were calculated for quantitative assessments. Statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The midterm surgical outcomes revealed a slight but significantly less maxillary advancement compared with the planned position (mean difference, 1.84 ± 1.50 mm; P = 0.004). The repositioning of the mandibular distal segment was stable, with insignificant differences in linear (T1-VSP, 1.01 ± 3.66 mm; T1-T2, 0.32 ± 4.17 mm) and angular (T1-VSP, 1.53° ± 1.60°; T1-T2, 1.54° ± 1.50°) displacements (P >0.05). The proximal segments exhibited lateral displacement within 1.5° for both the mandibular right and left ramus at T1-VSP and T1-T2 (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of fully digital planned and surgically repositioned maxilla and mandible revealed excellent precision. In the midterm surgical outcomes of maxillary advancement, a minor deviation from the planned anterior movement was observed.

Three-Dimensional Multi-Modality Registration for Orthopaedics and Cardiovascular Settings: State-of-the-Art and Clinical Applications

The multimodal and multidomain registration of medical images have gained increasing recognition in clinical practice as a powerful tool for fusing and leveraging useful information from different imaging techniques and in different medical fields such as cardiology and orthopedics. Image registration could be a challenging process, and it strongly depends on the correct tuning of registration parameters. In this paper, the robustness and accuracy of a landmarks-based approach have been presented for five cardiac multimodal image datasets. The study is based on 3D Slicer software and it is focused on the registration of a computed tomography (CT) and 3D ultrasound time-series of post-operative mitral valve repair. The accuracy of the method, as a function of the number of landmarks used, was performed by analysing root mean square error (RMSE) and fiducial registration error (FRE) metrics. The validation of the number of landmarks resulted in an optimal number of 10 landmarks. The mean RMSE and FRE values were 5.26 ± 3.17 and 2.98 ± 1.68 mm, respectively, showing comparable performances with respect to the literature. The developed registration process was also tested on a CT orthopaedic dataset to assess the possibility of reconstructing the damaged jaw portion for a pre-operative planning setting. Overall, the proposed work shows how 3D Slicer and registration by landmarks can provide a useful environment for multimodal/unimodal registration.

Virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a structured review

Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery is a challenging and very demanding field that involves the treatment of congenital and acquired conditions of the face and head. Due to the complexity of the head and facial region, various tools and techniques were developed and utilized to aid surgical procedures and optimize results. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) has revolutionized the way craniomaxillofacial surgeries are planned and executed. It uses 3D imaging computer software to visualize and simulate a surgical procedure. Numerous studies were published on the usage of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, the researchers found inconsistency in the previous literature which prompted the development of this review. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the findings of the studies by conducting an integrated approach to synthesize the literature related to the use of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Twenty-nine related articles were selected as a sample and synthesized thoroughly. These papers were grouped assigning to the four subdisciplines of craniomaxillofacial surgery: orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, trauma surgery and implant surgery. The following variables - treatment time, the accuracy of VSP, clinical outcome, cost, and cost-effectiveness - were also examined. Results revealed that VSP offers advantages in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the traditional method in terms of duration, predictability and clinical outcomes. However, the cost aspect was not discussed in most papers. This structured literature review will thus provide current findings and trends and recommendations for future research on the usage of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Does the type of planning in orthognathic surgery influence patient satisfaction?

PURPOSE

To determine if the method of orthognathic surgery planning used-computer aided surgical simulation (CASS) versus analog model surgery-influenced patients' post-operative satisfaction. The authors hypothesized that there was no difference in patient satisfaction based on the type of planning in orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-site, observational, retrospective cohort study consisting of a standardized survey aimed to be given to all patients who had orthognathic surgery at the authors' institution over a 6-year period. Patients were asked to complete a survey questionnaire that consisted of eight questions, each utilizing a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

There were 643 patients initially identified with 401 potential subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these 401 patients, the survey was successfully administered to 161. Patients whose orthognathic surgery was planned virtually were not only significantly more likely to be satisfied with their appearance post-operatively, but also more likely to go through with surgery again if they could choose to (p < 0.05). CASS patients were also more likely to identify that their surgery was planned virtually. When stratified by age, younger patients were more likely to have read about CASS. When each survey question was stratified based on the type of surgery that was performed, there were no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Patients whose surgeries were virtually planes were significantly more likely than model surgery patients to be satisfied with their post-operative appearance as well as with their decision to have orthognathic surgery. CASS has proven to be an accurate, time-saving, and potentially cost-saving tool for surgeons. Based on the results of this study, the type of surgical planning method matters for post-operative patient satisfaction with their appearance.

Reproducibility and reliability of digital occlusal planning for orthognathic surgery

The digital articulation of dental models is gradually replacing the conventional physical approach for occlusal prediction planning. This study was performed to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of free-hand articulation of two groups of digital and physical dental models, 12 Class I (group 1) and 12 Class III (group 2). The models were scanned using an intraoral scanner. The physical and digital models were independently articulated 2 weeks apart by three orthodontists to achieve the maximum inter-digitation, with coincident midlines and a positive overjet and overbite. The occlusal contacts provided by the software color-coded maps were assessed and the differences in the pitch, roll, and yaw were measured. The reproducibility of the achieved occlusion of both the physical and digital articulation was excellent. The z-axis displayed the smallest absolute mean differences of 0.10 ± 0.08 mm and 0.27 ± 0.24 mm in the repeated physical and repeated digital articulations, respectively, both in group 2. The largest discrepancies between the two methods of articulation were in the y-axis (0.76 ± 0.60 mm, P = 0.010) and in roll (1.83° ± 1.72°, P = 0.005). The overall measured differences were< 0.8 mm and< 2°. Despite the steep learning curve, digital occlusal planning is accurate enough for clinical applications.

Effect of offset on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effect of offset on the precision of three-dimensional (3D)-printed splints, proposing to optimize the splint design to compensate for systematic errors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

14 resin model sets were scanned and offset as a whole by given distances (0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, and 0.40 mm). Intermediate splints (ISs) and final splints (FSs) were generated from the non-offset and offset models and grouped correspondingly, named as splint type-offset value, IS-0.05, for instance. Dentitions occluded with the splint were scanned. Translational and rotational deviations of the lower dentition relative to the upper dentition were 3D measured.

RESULTS

Deviations of ISs and FSs were more evident in the vertical and pitch dimensions, and were mostly acceptable in other dimensions. ISs with offset ≥ 0.05 mm showed vertical deviations significantly below 1 mm (P < 0.05) while ISs with 0.10- to 0.30-mm offsets had pitch rotations significantly lower than 1° (P < 0.05). The Pitch of IS-0.35 was significantly larger than ISs with 0.15- to 0.30-mm offsets (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, FSs fit better as the offset increased and FSs with offsets ≥ 0.15 mm all had deviations significantly lower than 1 mm (for translation) or 1° (for rotation) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Offset affects the precision of 3D-printed splints. Moderate offset values of 0.10 to 0.30 mm are recommendable for ISs. Offset values ≥ 0.15 mm are recommended for FSs in cases with stable final occlusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study found the optimal offset ranges for 3D-printed ISs and FSs via a standardized protocol.

Accuracy of maxillary positioning using computer-designed and manufactured occlusal splints or patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of maxillary positioning using computer-designed and manufactured occlusal splints or patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 28 patients that underwent virtually planned orthognathic surgery with maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy either using VSP-generated splints (n = 13) or patient-specific implants (PSI) (n = 15) was conducted. The accuracy and surgical outcome of both techniques were compared by superimposing preoperative surgical planning with postoperative CT scans and measurement of translational and rotational deviation for each patient.

RESULTS

The 3D global geometric deviation between the planned position and the postoperative outcome was 0.60 mm (95%-CI 0.46-0.74, range 0.32-1.11 mm) for patients with PSI and 0.86 mm (95%-CI 0.44-1.28, range 0.09-2.60 mm) for patients with surgical splints. Postoperative differences for absolute and signed single linear deviations between planned and postoperative position were a little higher regarding the x-axis and pitch but lower regarding the y- and z-axis as well as yaw and roll for PSI compared to surgical splints. There were no significant differences regarding global geometric deviation, absolute and signed linear deviations in the x-, y-, and z-axis, and rotations (yaw, pitch, and roll) between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding accuracy for positioning of maxillary segments after Le Fort I osteotomy in orthognathic surgery patient-specific implants and surgical splints provide equivalent high accuracy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patient-specific implants for maxillary positioning and fixation facilitate the concept of splintless orthognathic surgery and can be reliably used in clinical routines.

Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with mandible first sequence: A retrospective study

The aim of this study was to verify treatment accuracy using virtual surgical planning (VSP) with a mandible-first sequence and strict surgical protocol to determine what surgical and methodological factors might influence outcomes. VSP transfer accuracy was evaluated retrospectively through a modified method involving voxel-based superimposition in patients who had undergone bimaxillary surgery with a mandible-first sequence to correct dentoskeletal deformities. Data analysis showed that the movements planned and those executed were substantially equivalent (p < 0.01), with the exception of mandibular and maxillary sagittal movements that were 0.72 ± 0.90 mm and 1.41 ± 1.04 mm smaller, respectively, than planned. This study showed that a mandible-first sequence is accurate for transferring virtual surgical planning intraoperatively. There are several factors involved in the proper transfer of virtual planning beyond the software, such as surgical technique and sequencing. Inaccurate sagittal movements and maxillary repositioning seem to depend mainly on surgical factors.

The Last 40 Years of Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Bibliometric analyses provide information on the effectiveness, performance, trends, and various other characteristics of research by using mathematical and statistical analysis methods for data related to scientific publications. This study aims to determine the focus of studies in the field of orthognathic surgery, map it, and present the results in a simplified manner through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the relevant literature.

METHODS

In this bibliometric analysis study, orthognathic surgery publications from 1980 to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The independent variables were co-citations, while the outcome variables included cross-country collaboration analysis, keyword analysis, co-citation analysis, and cluster analysis of the co-citation network. Covariates were the number of publications, number of citations, year range, centrality value, and silhouette value. The bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R-Studio software.

RESULTS

A total of 7,135 publications and 75,822 references were included in the analysis, and the annual growth rate of publications was 9.52%. The co-citation clustering analysis revealed that the orthognathic surgery literature was organized into 16 subject headings. Patient satisfaction was found to be the most widely published topic. The youngest clusters, representing new topics in the field, were virtual planning and examination of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Bibliometric analysis methods were used to evaluate the 40-year history of the orthognathic surgery literature. The analysis identified the most influential publications, the topics in which the literature is divided, and hot spots in the field. By conducting similar bibliometric research studies in the future, the progress and future direction of the literature can be monitored based on evidence.

Accuracy and safety of in-house surgeon-designed three-dimensional-printed patient-specific implants for wafer-less Le Fort I osteotomy

OBJECTIVES

The design and fabrication of three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific implants (PSIs) for orthognathic surgery are customarily outsourced to commercial companies. We propose a protocol of designing PSIs and surgical guides by orthognathic surgeons-in-charge instead for wafer-less Le Fort I osteotomy. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy and post-operative complications of PSIs that are designed in-house for Le Fort I osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The post-operative cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) model of the maxilla was superimposed to the virtual surgical planning to compare the discrepancies of pre-determined landmarks, lines, and principal axes between the two models. Twenty-five patients (12 males, 13 females) were included.

RESULTS

The median linear deviations of the post-operative maxilla of the x, y, and z axes were 0.74 mm, 0.75 mm, and 0.72 mm, respectively. The deviations in the principal axes for pitch, yaw, and roll were 1.40°, 0.90°, and 0.60°, respectively. There were no post-operative complications related to the PSIs in the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-printed PSIs designed in-house for wafer-less Le Fort I osteotomy are accurate and safe.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Its clinical outcomes and accuracy are comparable to commercial PSIs for orthognathic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration number: HKUCTR-2113. Date of registration: 29 July 2016.

Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Planning using Three-dimensional Virtual Techniques compared with Conventional Two-dimensional Techniques: a Systematic Review

Objectives

The objective was to assess the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning using three-dimensional virtual planning compared with conventional two-dimensional planning.

Material and Methods

MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search combined with hand-search of relevant journals was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English through August 2^nd, 2022. Primary outcomes included postsurgical accuracy of hard and soft tissue. Secondary outcomes included treatment planning time, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, financial expenses, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE system.

Results

Seven RCTs characterised by low, high, and unclear risk of bias fulfilled inclusion criteria. Included studies disclosed conflicting results regarding accuracy of hard and soft tissue as well as treatment planning time. The intraoperative time was shortened, and financial expenses were increased with three-dimensional virtual surgical planning (TVSP), while no planning-related complications were revealed. Comparable improvement in PROMs were reported with TVSP and two-dimensional planning.

Conclusions

Future orthognathic surgical planning will indisputable be performed by three-dimensional virtual planning. The financial expenses, treatment planning time, and intraoperative time will therefore probably decrease due to further development of three-dimensional virtual planning techniques. The hard and soft tissue accuracy between planned position and achieved surgical outcome seems to be improved by three-dimensional virtual planning compared with two-dimensional planning, although results are inconsistent. Further development of three-dimensional virtual planning involving cutting guides and patient-specific osteosynthesis plates are therefore needed to improve the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning.

Accuracy of Maxillary Positioning During Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparison of Web-based 3-Dimensional Virtual Surgical Planning and Actual Outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of planned maxillary positioning by virtual surgery by comparing planned and actual postoperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent 2-jaw orthognathic surgery performed by a single surgeon from May 2017 to December 2020 were the subjects of this retrospective study. The coordinates of reference points in horizontal, sagittal, and coronal planes as determined by virtual surgery were compared with those of actual surgical outcomes. The reference points used were as follows: #16 mesiobuccal cusp tip (#16), #26 mesiobuccal cusp tip (#26), and #11 mesial tip (U1); anterior nasal spine; and posterior nasal spine. Three-dimensional linear distances between the reference point on which virtual surgery was performed and the reference point after the actual operation was calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, there were 11 males and 9 females of average age 20.65±2.41 years. Three-dimensional printed wafers had high accuracy with a maximum difference of 0.3 mm. No significant difference was observed in horizontal or coronal planes for any reference point, but a significant difference was observed in the sagittal plane. However, positional differences between planned and actual reference points were all <1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning and 3-dimensional printed wafer achieved excellent maxillary positioning accuracies after orthognathic surgery.

What Is the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery Using Occlusally-Based Guides and Patient-Specific Fixation in Both Jaws? A Cohort Study and Discussion of Surgical Techniques

PURPOSE

The development of advanced digital orthognathic surgical protocols requires investigation to determine the accuracy of surgical outcomes. This report's purpose is to quantify 3-dimensional linear discrepancies between simulated and actual results for double-jaw orthognathic surgery utilizing occlusally-based guides in conjunction with patient-specific fixation in both jaws.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed the accuracy of double-jaw orthognathic surgery, in all cases performed by 1 surgeon between May 2019 and January 2021, utilizing occlusally-based guides and patient-specific fixation plates in both maxillary and mandibular surgeries. The primary outcome was absolute linear discrepancy between virtually-planned and surgically-achieved maxillary and mandibular position in 3 dimensions. Secondary outcomes were relative (directional) discrepancy, to assess if protocols erred in 1 direction of each surgical axis. Sequencing of bimaxillary surgery, age, and sex were covariates. Absolute and relative linear differences at A-point, B-point, and pogonion were evaluated using t tests. Descriptive statistics were amassed, and results were analyzed to determine if discrepancies differed from a null hypothesis of 2-mm error.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were enrolled, consisting of 25 males and 24 females with a mean age of 24.8 years. Thirty-five single-piece and 14 multipiece LeFort I osteotomies, 49 bilateral sagittal splits, and 35 genioplasties were studied; there were 22 maxilla-first and 27 mandible-first surgeries. Mean A-point absolute discrepancies of 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.73), 0.37 (0.24-0.50), and 0.45 (0.33-0.57) mm were observed in horizontal, transverse, and vertical planes, respectively. B-point discrepancies were 1.15 (0.79-1.52), 0.62 (0.47-0.78), and 1.14 (0.91-1.38) mm. Pogonion discrepancies were 1.29 (0.86-1.73), 0.85 (0.64-1.06), and 1.24 (1.00-1.49) mm. All P values were <.001. Sequencing of bimaxillary surgery did not alter absolute differences (P = .2 to >.9) with A-point discrepancies consistently smaller than B-point and pogonion discrepancies regardless of sequencing. Mandible-first surgery was associated with posterior directional error; both sequences were associated with superior directional error at B-point and pogonion.

CONCLUSION

Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery utilizing a patient-specific protocol in both jaws produces results highly reproducible to planned simulated surgery and accurate below a 2-mm hypothesis, with maxillary discrepancies approaching 0.5 mm and mandibular discrepancies approaching 1 mm.

Three-Dimensional Comparison of the Maxillary Surfaces through ICP-Type Algorithm: Accuracy Evaluation of CAD/CAM Technologies in Orthognathic Surgery

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aims to compare the accuracy of two different CAD/CAM systems in orthognathic surgery. The novelty of this work lies in the method of evaluating the accuracy, i.e., using an Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm, which matches a pair of 2D or 3D point clouds with unknown dependencies of the transition from scan s_(k) to scan s_(k+1).

METHODS

The study population was composed of ten patients who presented to the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of the University "Sapienza" of Rome for the evaluation and management of skeletal malocclusions. The patients were divided into two groups, depending on the technique used: group 1: splintless group (custom-made cutting guide and plates); group 2: splint group (using a 3D-printed splint). STL files were imported into Geomagic^® Control X™ software, which allows for comparison and analysis using an ICP algorithm. The RMSE parameter (3D error) was used to calculate the accuracy. In addition, data were compared in two different patient subgroups. The first subgroup only underwent a monobloc Le Fort I osteotomy (p-value = 0.02), and the second subgroup underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy associated with a segmental osteotomy of the maxilla (p-value = 0.23).

RESULTS

Group 1 showed a 3D error of 1.22 mm ± SD 0.456, while group 2 showed a 3D error of 1.63 mm ± SD 0.303. These results have allowed us to compare the accuracy of the two CAD/CAM systems (p-value = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICP algorithm provided a reproducible method of comparison. The splintless method would seem more accurate (p-value = 0.02) in transferring the surgical programming into the operating room when only a Le Fort I osteotomy is to be performed.

Effect of occlusal coverage depths on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints

BACKGROUND

Precise orthognathic surgical splints are important in surgical-orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to propose a standardized protocol for three-dimensional (3D)-printed splints and assess the precision of splints with different occlusal coverage on the dentition (occlusal coverage depth, OCD), thus optimizing the design of 3D-printed splints to minimize the seemingly unavoidable systematic errors.

METHODS

Resin models in optimal occlusion from 19 patients were selected and scanned. Intermediate splints (ISs) and final splints (FSs) with 2-mm, 3-mm, 4-mm, and 5-mm OCDs were fabricated and grouped as IS-2, IS-3, IS-4, IS-5, FS-2, FS-3, FS-4, and FS-5, respectively. The dentitions were occluded with each splint and scanned as a whole to compare with the original occlusion. Translational and rotational deviations of the lower dentition and translational deviations of the landmarks were measured.

RESULTS

For vertical translation, the lower dentitions translated inferiorly to the upper dentition in most of the splints, and the translation increased as OCD got larger. Vertical translations of the dentitions in 89.47% of IS-2, 68.42% of IS-3, 42.11% of IS-4, 10.53% of IS-5, 94.74% of FS-2, 63.16% of FS-3, 26.32% of FS-4, and 21.05% of FS-5 splints were below 1 mm, respectively. For pitch rotation, the lower dentitions rotated inferiorly and posteriorly in most groups, and the rotation increased as OCD got larger. Pitch rotations of the dentitions in 100% of IS-2, 89.47% of IS-3, 57.89% of IS-4, 52.63% of IS-5, 100.00% of FS-2, 78.95% of FS-3, 52.63% of FS-4, and 47.37% of FS-5 splints were below 2°, respectively. On the other hand, the transversal and sagittal translations, roll and yaw rotations of most groups were clinically acceptable (translation < 1 mm and rotation < 2°). The deviations of ISs and FSs showed no statistical significance at all levels of coverage (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol was proposed to generate 3D-printed ISs and FSs with normalized basal planes and standardized OCDs. Deviations of the ISs and FSs were more evident in the vertical dimension and pitch rotation and had a tendency to increase as the OCD got larger. ISs and FSs with both 2-mm and 3-mm OCD are recommendable regarding the precision relative to clinical acceptability. However, considering the fabrication, structural stability, and clinical application, ISs and FSs with 3-mm OCD are recommended for accurate fitting.

The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental Le Fort I surgery: A comparison of planned and actual outcome

Segmental Le Fort I surgery is an effective technique to correct complicated dentomaxillofacial deformities. This retrospective study evaluated the accuracy of segmental Le Fort I surgery under the guidance of virtual surgical planning (VSP). A total of 129 patients who accepted segmental Le Fort I surgery were investigated in this study. VSP was transferred to segmental surgery with different pieces precisely with the aid of 3D-printed surgical templates and splints. The surgical result was evaluated by postoperative complications, color distance maps, and quantitative accuracy analysis. Outcomes showed that the VSP was successfully transferred to actual surgery with high accuracy. The overall mean linear difference was 1.28 mm, and the overall mean angular difference was 2.4°. Except for one case of root injury, there was no serious complication recorded. The results suggested that VSP was a reliable assistance for segmental Le Fort I surgery.

Computer Aided Orthognathic Surgery: A General Method for Designing and Manufacturing Personalized Cutting/Repositioning Templates

Orthognathic surgery allows broad-spectrum deformity correction involving both aesthetic and functional aspects on the TMJ (temporo-mandibular joint) and on the facial skull district. The combination of Reverse Engineering (RE), Virtual Surgery Planning (VSP), Computer Aided Design (CAD), Additive Manufacturing (AM), and 3D visualization allows surgeons to plan, virtually, manipulations and the translation of the human parts in the operating room. This work’s aim was to define a methodology, in the form of a workflow, for surgery planning and for designing and manufacturing templates for orthognathic surgery. Along the workflow, the error chain was checked and the maximum error in virtual planning was evaluated. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the mandibular shape and bone fragment movements after segmentation allow complete planning of the surgery and, following the proposed method, the introduction of both the innovative evaluation of the transversal intercondylar distance variation after mandibular arch advancement/set and the possibility of use of standard plates to plan and realize a customized surgery. The procedure was adopted in one clinical case on a patient affected by a class III malocclusion with an associated open bite and right deviation of the mandible with expected good results. Compared with the methods from most recent literature, the presented method introduces two elements of novelty and improves surgery results by optimizing costs and operating time. A new era of collaboration among surgeons and engineer has begun and is now bringing several benefits in personalized surgery.

Applications of three-dimensional surgical planning in facial feminization surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite some reports that have shown an increase in safety, efficiency, and accuracy during feminizing craniofacial procedures utilizing three-dimensional (3D) technology, there are no reports summarizing the available evidence on this matter for facial feminization surgery (FFS). Here, we aimed to systematically review the application of 3D technology on FFS.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, SCOPUS, Ovid MEDLINE®, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect looking for studies reporting the use of 3D surgical planning in the setting of FFS following the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted data on photographic assessment, imaging, surgical application, and surgical technique and outcomes.

RESULTS

This review included 10 studies comprising 1473 transgender female patients and 50 cadaveric cranial specimens. Four studies employed virtual surgical planning (VSP) and the concomitant use of prefabricated cutting guides. One study reported the implementation of 3D VSP using a female skull as a reference. One study used computer-aided design cutting guides and custom plates for FFS. Standardized incorporation of 3D printed models allowed for preoperative planning in three studies. Three studies reported VSP using 3D reconstruction of CT images, but without the use of 3D printing. Three studies used 3D photography with specialized camera technology to enrich clinical documentation and provide a comprehensive facial analysis of soft tissue. Accuracy ranged from 85.7% to 97%. Morbidity ranged from 0% to 12.5%.

CONCLUSION

Based on this data, we believe 3D VSP has promising outcomes in terms of accuracy and low morbidity, encouraging its implementation in FFS. However, further prospective double-arm cohort studies are required.

Custom Plates in Orthognathic Surgery: A Single Surgeon's Experience and Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) now allows for the fabrication of custom plates in orthognathic surgery. The senior author was an early adopter, using VSP and stereolithographic splints for over a decade, before transitioning to custom plates in 2019. The authors present our experience and learning curve with this new technology and compare results to a prior cohort of orthognathic patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with the senior author between 2016 and 2021. All underwent VSP and stereolithographic splint formation, and then either traditional or custom-plate fixation. Demographics, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Traditional fixation consisted of craniomaxillofacial plates, bent intraoperatively by the surgeon to adapt to the facial skeleton. Custom plates were prefabricated and prebent to fit drill holes outlined by customized cutting guides.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients underwent surgery in the study period, 25 (58.1%) with traditional fixation hardware and 18 (41.9%) with custom plates. The surgical technique evolved throughout the custom-plate cohort, with the most recent technique involving custom maxillary plate fixation and traditional mandibular plate fixation. When comparing this group of patients to the prior cohort of traditional fixation patients, operative time significantly decreased (mean 233 minutes versus 283 minutes, P = 0.044), without significant difference in complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific cutting guides and custom plates allow for precise spatial positioning of the osteotomized jaw in the orthognathic surgery. Unsurprisingly, obstacles must be overcome in adopting this new technology; here, we outline our experience and technical modifications that have resulted in increased surgical efficiency with comparable outcomes.

Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach

Background

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of virtual surgical planning (VSP) in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach (SFA) by means of three-dimensional (3D) measuring and superimposition, so as to promote the application of digital technology in combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.

Methods

20 patients treated with segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA from 2018 to 2020 were included. All of them acquired VSP performed by ProPlan CMF 3.0 software (Materialise Corporation, Belgium). The preoperative (T0) 3D model of VSP and the postoperative (T1) 3D model, reconstructed by the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data acquired one week after surgery, were compared by measuring the 3D coordinates of the landmarks as well as 3D model superimposition for deviation analysis. The deviation analysis was achieved by Geomagic Studio 2013 (3D Systems Corporation, USA). The differences which represented the accuracy of VSP were evaluated by the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and the Bland–Altman method.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the 3D coordinates of T1 and T0 (P > 0.05), and the mean overall RMSD was 1.37 mm, within the clinical relevance of 2 mm. The RMSD of sagittal direction (1.76 mm) was greater than that of coronal and vertical directions (1.09 mm and 1.24 mm), and the RMSD of maxillary and mandibular aspects were basically equal (1.30 mm and 1.45 mm). The Bland–Altman method showed the T0 and T1 measurements were in good agreement. The mean RMSD obtained from the deviation analysis was 1.85 mm, within the clinical relevance.

Conclusions

VSP in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA proved to acquire accurate outcome in this study.

Evaluation of ortogonblender software bone movement tools in bimaxillary orthognatic surgeries performed in dolphin software

The aim of this observational, longitudinal and retrospective study was to evaluate the fidelity of virtual surgical planning (VSP) performed on Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions® 11.95 software on hard tissues, using the tools of the open-source software OrtogOnBlender - Blender3D. For this, linear, angular and 7-point anatomical measurements of the skeletal profile were used, and the discrepancies between the VSP and the result after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery were calculated. Pre- and postoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans of 43 consecutive patients with class II and III skeletal deformities were evaluated and the results of the VSP were compared to the 1-month postoperative results. All overlapping points presented values within the range considered clinically irrelevant (< 2 mm and < 4°) and differences were not significant (p > 0.05). The comparison of anatomical points showed lower values (≤ 2.11 mm) in point A of class II. For hard tissues, the comparison between VSP and 1-month postoperative tomography demonstrated the faithful results of virtual planning using this software.

Evaluation of the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: Systematic review

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in bone by comparing the mean linear and angular measurements of the surgical plan with the actual surgical result. Electronic databases, MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, grey literature, and the American clinical trials registry (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), were accessed as search engines. The studies consisted of publications on the assessment of accuracy in virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery between 2010 and 2020. After application of the eligibility criteria, 26 articles were included, and their quality was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool and Cohen's kappa statistic in the MedCalc program (MedCalc Software Ltd). Evidence obtained by comparing the planning and surgical results, both in the maxilla and mandible, showed that there is great accuracy in virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

Conformity of the Virtual Surgical Plan to the Actual Result Comparing Five Craniofacial Procedure Types

BACKGROUND

The "accuracy" of virtual surgical planning across multiple procedure types is not known. The authors aimed to compare the planned outcome from virtual surgical planning to the actual postoperative outcome for five craniofacial procedure types performed by a single surgeon: implant cranioplasty, cranial vault remodeling, orthognathic surgery, mandible reconstruction, and mandibular distraction.

METHODS

Stereolithography formats were obtained from virtual surgical planning and compared to postoperative computed tomographic scans for consecutive patients who underwent one of the five procedure types. Volumetric renderings of the operated bony region of interest were overlaid and compared using a Boolean operation to compute conformity (as a percentage of the region of interest). Conformity across procedure type was analyzed using analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni analysis, where appropriate.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients were included (51.5 percent male and 49.5 percent female; mean age, 27 years; 59 orthognathic surgery, 32 cranial vault remodeling, 16 mandible reconstruction, 12 mandibular distraction, and 11 implant cranioplasty patients). The highest tier of conformity was obtained for implant cranioplasty (median, 76.8 ± 10.3 percent) and mandible reconstruction (mean, 69.4 ± 11.2 percent), followed by orthognathic surgery (mean, 55.0 ± 7.3 percent) and mandibular distraction (median, 41.9 ± 20.3 percent), followed by cranial vault remodeling (mean, 22.2 ± 12.1 percent) (p < 0.001 between tiers and p > 0.05 among tiers).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning resulting in custom permanent implants and intraoperative guides provides more predictable results compared to virtual surgical planning used for procedures involving higher degrees of skeletal repositioning and postoperative movement (i.e., mandibular distraction and nonrigid cranial vault remodeling). In cases with expectedly lower conformity, excellent outcomes can be achieved with sound intraoperative judgment.

Comparison of actual amount of movement with surgical treatment objective in the orthognathic maxillary repositioning

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative position of the maxilla with the surgical treatment objectives (STO) in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for evaluating the surgical accuracy and investigating the pattern and cause of the discrepancy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing conventional bimaxillary orthognathic surgery by a single oral and maxillofacial surgeon were enrolled. Utilizing the superimposition of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography images, the actual amounts of positional change of both the maxillary central incisor and first molars were compared with those of STO. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the actual discrepancy between STO and the postoperative position and factors that may affect surgical accuracy were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 62 cases, the absolute mean value of the positional difference between STO and the actual outcome was 2.20 mm (X-axis, 0.93 mm; Y-axis, 1.31 mm; and Z-axis, 1.09 mm) in the maxillary central incisor. The signed mean value of the central incisor was -0.07 mm, 0.79 mm, and -0.57 mm in the X-, Y-, and Z-axes, respectively, and the value in the Y- and Z-axes showed a statistically significant difference in comparison with STO (P<0.01). Age, sex, skeletal Angle classification, maxillary and mandibular profile, use of 3D virtual surgery, facial asymmetry, and yawing correction did not show a statistically significant correlation with surgical accuracy at the central incisor.

CONCLUSION

There was an acceptable range of discrepancy between postoperative maxillary position and STO after orthognathic surgery; however, there was a tendency for posterior and downward movement in the maxillary anterior teeth.

Predictability of maxillary positioning: a 3D comparison of virtual and conventional orthognathic surgery planning

Background

Virtual surgery planning (VSP) is believed to reduce inaccuracies in maxillary positioning compared to conventional surgery planning (CSP) due to the elimination of face-bow transfer and laboratory steps. However, there is still a lack of comparative studies for the accuracy of splint-based maxillary positioning in CSP versus VSP. Therefore, the objective of this retrospective, observational study was to compare if splints produced by VSP and CSP reach postoperative outcomes within clinically acceptable limits.

Methods

The planned and actual postoperative results of 52 patients (VSP: n = 26; CSP: n = 26) with a mean age of 24.4 ± 6.2 years were investigated by three-dimensional (3D) alignment with planning software. The conventional treatment plan was digitized, so that the evaluation of both methods was performed in the same manner using the same coordinate system. Inaccuracies were measured by sagittal, vertical and transversal deviations of the upper central incisors and the inclination of the maxillary occlusal plane between the planned and achieved maxillary positions.

Results

Both methods demonstrated significant differences between the planned and actual outcome. The highest inaccuracies were observed in vertical impaction and midline correction. No significant differences between CSP and VSP were observed in any dimension. Errors in vertical and sagittal dimension intensified each other.

Conclusions

In conclusion, splint-based surgeries reached similar results regardless of the applied planning method and splint production.

Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to measure the time of the conventional surgical planning (CSP) and virtual surgical planning (VSP) in orthognathic surgery and to compare them in terms of cost.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a retrospective study of the patients who underwent orthognathic surgery at the OOOOO University Dental Hospital from December 2017 to August 2018. All the patients were analyzed through both CSP and VSP, and all the surgical stents were fabricated through manual and 3-dimensional (3D) printing. The predictor variables were the planning method (CSP vs. VSP) and the surgery type (group I: Le Fort I osteotomy+bilateral sagittal split osteotomy [LFI+BSSO] or group II: only bilateral sagittal split osteotomy [BSSO]), and the outcomes were the time and cost. The results were analyzed using paired t test.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (12 females, 18 males) met the inclusion criteria, and 17 patients were excluded from the study due to missing or incomplete data. There were 20 group I patients (LFI+BSSO regardless of genioplasty) and 10 group II patients (BSSO regardless of genioplasty). The average time of CSP for group I was 385±7.8 min, and that for group II was 195±8.33 min. The time reduction rate of VSP compared with CSP was 62.8% in group I and 41.5% in group II. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant cost reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The time investment in VSP in this study was significantly smaller than that in CSP, and the difference was greater in group I than in group II.

Accuracy and cost effectiveness of a waferless osteotomy approach, using patient specific guides and plates in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the accuracy of waferless osteotomy procedures in orthognathic surgery with a secondary aim to determine the cost-effectiveness of the procedure. A literature search was conducted on the databases PubMed and Scopus, with PRISMA guidelines followed. An initial yield of 4149 articles were identified, ten of which met the desired inclusion criteria. The total sample of patients undergoing waferless osteotomies included in this review was 142 patients. Nine of the studies used surgical cutting guides along with customised surgical plates to eliminate the surgical wafer and one study used pre-bent locking plates instead of customised plates. The eligible articles determined their surgical accuracy by comparing the positions of bony or dental landmarks on the pre-operative and post-operative images. The articles all reported acceptable accuracy within previously established clinical parameters. The majority of authors concluded that it is an accurate surgical approach and can be cost effective which is often a barrier to novel techniques however there were studies that contrasted the view of the cost efficacy. Due to the lack of published randomised controlled trials, current evidence is not strong enough to recommend the use of surgical cutting guides and customised/pre-bent plates for orthognathic surgery.

Analysis of Actual Versus Predicated Intracranial Volume Changes for Distraction Osteogenesis Using Virtual Surgical Planning in Patients With Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

The primary outcome metric in patients with craniosynostosis are changes in intracranial volumes (ICVs). In patients who undergo distraction osteogenesis (DO) to treat craniosynostosis, changes are also dependent on the length of distraction. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been used to predict anticipated changes in ICV during cranial vault reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to analyze the actual versus predicted ICV changes using VSP in patients who undergo DO for craniosynostosis management.

METHODS

All patients with craniosynostosis treated with DO at a single institution, Rady Children's Hospital, between December 2013 and May 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria are as follows: VSP planning with predicted postoperative ICV values and preoperative and postdistraction CT scans to quantify ICV. Postoperative ICV and VSP-estimated ICV were adjusted for age-related ICV growth. The primary outcome measure calculated was age-adjusted percent volume change per millimeter distraction (PVCPD), and results were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent DO for cranial vault remodeling. Nineteen patients were nonsyndromic, and 8 patients were syndromic. The median postoperative PVCPD was 0.30%/mm, and the median VSP-estimated PVCPD was 0.36% per millimeter (P < 0.001). A subanalysis of nonsyndromic patients showed a median postoperative PVCPD of 0.29%/mm in nonsyndromic patients that differed significantly from the VSP estimate of 0.34%/mm (P = 0.003). There was also a significant difference in syndromic patients' observed PVCPD of 0.41%/mm versus VSP estimate of 0.79%/mm (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning overestimates the change in ICV attributable to DO in both syndromic and nonsyndromic patients.

Three-dimensional virtual planning in mandibular advancement surgery: Soft tissue prediction based on deep learning

The study aimed at developing a deep-learning (DL)-based algorithm to predict the virtual soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement surgery, and to compare its accuracy with the mass tensor model (MTM). Subjects who underwent mandibular advancement surgery were enrolled and divided into a training group and a test group. The DL model was trained using 3D photographs and CBCT data based on surgically achieved mandibular displacements (training group). Soft tissue simulations generated by DL and MTM based on the actual surgical jaw movements (test group) were compared with soft-tissue profiles on postoperative 3D photographs using distance mapping in terms of mean absolute error in the lower face, lower lip, and chin regions. 133 subjects were included - 119 in the training group and 14 in the test group. The mean absolute error for DL-based simulations of the lower face region was 1.0 ± 0.6 mm and was significantly lower (p = 0.02) compared with MTM-based simulations (1.5 ± 0.5 mm). CONCLUSION: The DL-based algorithm can predict 3D soft tissue profiles following mandibular advancement surgery. With a clinically acceptable mean absolute error. Therefore, it seems to be a relevant option for soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery. Therefore, it seems to be a relevant options.

Immediate three-dimensional changes in the oropharynx after different mandibular advancements in counterclockwise rotation orthognathic planning

Background

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the immediate effect on the oropharynx dimensions from different mandibular advancements in patients undergone counterclockwise rotation (CCW) of the maxillomandibular complex.

Material and Methods

138 CBCT images of patients, who had undergone orthognathic surgery, were identified from Dolphin Imaging archive according to pre- (T0) and post-operative (T1) times. Each pre-operative CBCT image was selected considering retrognathic mandible. Superimpositions of CBCT images were performed to measure mandibular advancement at B point in millimeters (mm) and divided into three groups: G1 (< 5 mm), G2 (between 5 and 10 mm) and G3 (> 10 mm). For evaluating oropharynx dimension at T0 and T1 for each group, medial sagittal area (MSA), volume, and minimum cross-sectional axial area (CSA) were measured on Dolphin Imaging. Pearson correlation verified reliability of method. Paired t-test were applied to compare values of measurements between T0 and T1 (p ≤ 0.05).

Results

88 CBCT images were included. Method was reliable (r ≥ 0.93). According to MSA, volume and CSA values from G1, there was no significant difference between T0 and T1. CSA values presented significant difference comparing T0 and T1 in G2 (p ≤ 0.05). In subjects of G3, measurements increased in T1 significantly affecting oropharynx dimension.

Conclusions

MSA, volume and CSA values showed a significant increase affecting upper airway in advancements higher than 10 mm. Mandibular advancement range showed different effects in the airway space and should be considered to achieve favorable post-operative results in the oropharynx dimensions.

Key words:Retrognathia, orthognathic surgery, three-dimensional imaging, oropharynx, airway.

Virtually-Planned Orthognathic Surgery Achieves an Accurate Condylar Position

PURPOSE

Accuracy in orthognathic surgery with virtual planning has been reported, but detailed analysis of accuracy according to anatomic location, including the mandibular condyle, is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual plan and surgical outcomes and analyze the degree and distribution of errors according to each anatomic location.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated skeletal class III patients, treated with bimaxillary surgery. The primary predictor was anatomic locations that consisted of right and left condyles, maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. Other variables were age and gender. The primary outcome was surgical accuracy, defined as mean 3-dimensional distance error, mean absolute error, and mean error along the horizontal, vertical, and anteroposterior axes between the virtual plan and surgical outcomes. Landmarks were compared using a computational method based on affine transformation with a 1-time landmark setting. The mean errors were visualized with multidimensional scattergrams. Bivariate and regression statistics were computed.

RESULTS

This study included 52 patients, 26 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 21 years and 3 months. The mean 3D distance errors for condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were 1.03, 1.25, and 2.24 mm, respectively. Condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and the landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were positioned at 0.49 mm inferior, 0.28 mm anterior, and 1.25 mm inferior, respectively. The landmark errors for the distal segment of the mandible exhibited a wider distribution than those for condylar and maxillary landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between the planned and actual outcome aided by virtual surgical planning was highest for the condyles, followed by the maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. It is important to consider the tendency for surgical errors in each anatomic location during operations.

A comparative study of the accuracy between two computer-aided surgical simulation methods in virtual surgical planning

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective and observational study was to compare the accuracy of two different virtual surgical planning (VSP) protocols, namely, the CASS method and the modified CASS method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, planned using either the CASS method or the modified CASS method. Linear and angular discrepancies between the VSP outcome and postoperative outcome for both groups were compared for maxilla, mandible, and chin segments. Aside from the comparison between both groups, additional criteria were used to determine the accuracy of the protocol based on a linear and angular difference between planned and actual outcomes of less than 2 mm and 4°, respectively. The intergroup comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA, with the level of significance set at 5%.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients, of both genders, were assigned into group I (n = 11), planned with the CASS method, and group II (n = 10), planned with the modified CASS method. Both the CASS and modified CASS methods presented similar accuracy with regard to linear differences for the maxilla, mandible, and chin segments, except for ΔX for the mandibular segment, where the modified CASS method showed slightly better accuracy. However, there was a statistically significant difference with regard to angular differences in the chin segment, with the CASS method shown to be the more accurate. Aside from Δpitch for the chin segment, no linear or angular differences exceeded 2 mm or 4°.

CONCLUSION

Although statistically significant differences were found with regard to angular measurements in the chin segment, the accuracy of the modified CASS method for virtual planning can be considered as clinically equivalent, with a performance comparable to that of the CASS method.

Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical trials.

METHODS

Our search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SciELO for articles published in the last decade. A total of 392 articles identified were assessed independently and in a blinded manner using eligibility criteria, out of which only twelve articles were selected for inclusion in our research. Data were presented using intra-class correlation coefficient, and linear and angular differences in three planes.

RESULTS

The comparison of the accuracy analyses of the examined method has shown an average translation (< 2 mm) in the maxilla and also in the mandible (in three planes). The accuracy values for pitch, yaw, and roll (°) were (< 2.75, < 1.7 and < 1.1) for the maxilla, respectively, and (< 2.75, < 1.8, < 1.1) for the mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intra-oral scans of the dental casts is the most used imaging protocols for virtual orthognathic planning. Furthermore, calculation of the linear and angular differences between the virtual plan and postoperative outcomes was the most frequented method used for accuracy assessment (10 out of 12 studies) and a difference less than 2 mm/° was considered acceptable and accurate. When comparing this technique with the classical planning, virtual planning appears to be more accurate, especially in terms of frontal symmetry.

CONCLUSION

Virtual planning seems to be an accurate and reproducible method for orthognathic treatment planning. However, more clinical trials are needed to clearly determine the accuracy and validation of the virtual planning in orthognathic surgery.

Automatic Registration Between Dental Cone-Beam CT and Scanned Surface via Deep Pose Regression Neural Networks and Clustered Similarities

Computerized registration between maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography (CT) images and a scanned dental model is an essential prerequisite for surgical planning for dental implants or orthognathic surgery. We propose a novel method that performs fully automatic registration between a cone-beam CT image and an optically scanned model. To build a robust and automatic initial registration method, deep pose regression neural networks are applied in a reduced domain (i.e., two-dimensional image). Subsequently, fine registration is performed using optimal clusters. A majority voting system achieves globally optimal transformations while each cluster attempts to optimize local transformation parameters. The coherency of clusters determines their candidacy for the optimal cluster set. The outlying regions in the iso-surface are effectively removed based on the consensus among the optimal clusters. The accuracy of registration is evaluated based on the Euclidean distance of 10 landmarks on a scanned model, which have been annotated by experts in the field. The experiments show that the registration accuracy of the proposed method, measured based on the landmark distance, outperforms the best performing existing method by 33.09%. In addition to achieving high accuracy, our proposed method neither requires human interactions nor priors (e.g., iso-surface extraction). The primary significance of our study is twofold: 1) the employment of lightweight neural networks, which indicates the applicability of neural networks in extracting pose cues that can be easily obtained and 2) the introduction of an optimal cluster-based registration method that can avoid metal artifacts during the matching procedures.

Comparison of three different types of splints and templates for maxilla repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

The selection and implementation of a plan for maxillary surgery is of the utmost importance in achieving the desired outcome for the patient undergoing two-jaw orthognathic surgery. Some splint-based and splintless methods, accompanied by computer-assisted techniques, are helpful in improving surgical plan implementation. However, randomized controlled trials focused on this procedure are lacking. This study included 61 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgeries. The patients were randomly assigned to a conventional resin occlusal splint (CROS) group, a digital occlusal splint (DOS) group, or a digital templates (DT) group, in a 1:1:1 ratio. The mean linear distance between the planned and actual postoperative positions of eight selected points on the surfaces of the maxillary teeth was selected as the outcome measure. The distance was significantly smaller in the DT group (1.17±0.66mm) when compared to both the CROS group (2.55±0.95mm, P<0.05) and DOS group (2.15±1.12mm, P<0.05). However, the difference between the CROS group and DOS group was not statistically significant. These findings indicate that using digital templates results in the best performance in transferring the surgical plan to the operation environment as compared to the other two types of splints. This suggests that the application of digital templates could provide a reliable treatment option.

Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates

The advent of three-dimensional imaging and computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) have brought about a paradigm shift in surgical planning. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized titanium surgical guides and fixation plates. Thirty consecutive adult patients, 13 male and 17 female, with a mean age of 29.2 years and 25.5 years, respectively, requiring Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, with or without simultaneous mandibular surgery, were evaluated retrospectively. All orthognathic surgeries were performed by one experienced surgeon. The pre-surgical and post-surgical volumetric imaging were superimposed to assess the linear and angular differences between the planned and actual positions of the maxilla following surgery. With the use of the CAD/CAM titanium surgical guides and fixation plates, all surgical movements were within 2mm and 4° of the planned movements, which is considered clinically insignificant. The overall root mean square error between the planned and actual surgical movements was 0.38mm in the transverse dimension, 0.64mm in the anteroposterior dimension, and 0.55mm in the vertical dimension. In regard to the centroid of the maxilla, the absolute angular difference of the maxillary centroid was 1.06° in pitch, 0.47° in roll, and 0.49° in yaw. Maxillary repositioning surgery can be performed with high accuracy using CAD/CAM titanium surgical guides and fixation plates.

A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Based on Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

To explore the advantages of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and traditional surgical planning (TSP) to determine whether the current VSP technique is superior to the TSP technique for orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

An electronic search was carried out in the CENTRAL, PubMed, and Embase databases to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the VSP and TSP techniques regarding their surgical accuracy for hard tissue, prediction precision for soft tissue, required time for planning and surgery, cost and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight articles from 5 RCTs, involving 199 patients, were identified. The findings showed that the VSP and TSP techniques were similar in surgical accuracy for hard tissue in the sagittal plane, although the VSP technique was significantly more accurate in certain reference areas, especially in the anterior area of the maxilla. Both the VSP and TSP techniques had significantly better surgical accuracy for the maxilla than for the mandible. The VSP technique showed clinically significantly greater precision for soft tissue prediction in the sagittal plane. Patients who were treated via the VSP technique presented a more symmetrical frontal view, regardless of whether hard or soft tissue was involved. The VSP technique required more time for software planning, but it showed an advantage in time savings when considering the entire preoperative process. Accompanied by the use of an accurate computer-aided splint, the VSP technique could effectively reduce the operative time. Apart from the initial financial investment of software and hardware, the total cost of the VSP technique was similar to that of the TSP technique. Patients who were treated via the VSP or TSP technique showed similar improvements in quality-of-life.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the VSP technique has become a good alternative to the TSP technique for orthognathic surgery, especially regarding frontal-esthetic considerations. Studies reporting indicators with good representativeness and sensitivity using an identical comparative method are recommended.

Improvement in accuracy of maxillary repositioning of Le Fort I osteotomy with Orthopilot™ Navigation System: evaluation of 30 patients

Traditional model surgery with facebow transfer is not very accurate. We aimed to demonstrate that the Orthopilot™ Navigation System improves the accuracy of maxillary repositioning during Le Fort I osteotomy. Thirty patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy alone or associated to sagittal split osteotomy. The maxilla positioning was done in two phases. First, the maxilla was positioned with the traditional occlusal splint, the position ("without Orthopilot™") was recorded by the Orthopilot™. In the second phase, the Orthopilot™ was used to improve positioning; and the final position ("with Orthopilot™") was recorded, after osteosynthesis. Positioning data were compared with planned data. Positioning data with and without the Orthopilot™ were also compared. Accuracy was classified in distinct classes with three major criteria (conformity, non-conformity, failure) according to the discrepancies. Conformity rate was significantly greater with the Orthopilot™ (2 without the Orthopilot™ compared with 8 with the Orthopilot™; p=0.01). The failure rate was significantly lower with the Orthopilot™ (18 without Orthopilot™ compared with 7 with the Orthopilot™; p=0.002). Dispersions of discrepancies were usually lower in all directions with the Orthopilot™. Navigation reduced the risk of discrepancy without cancelling it, especially when large movements are planned. The Orthopilot™ therefore improved the accuracy of traditional occlusal splint during Le Fort I osteotomy.