Perioperative Comparison Between Open Cranial Vault Remodeling and Distraction Osteogenesis for Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis

There are multiple treatment options for unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis (ULS) including open posterior cranial vault remodeling (OCVR) and distraction osteogenesis (DO). There is a paucity of data comparing these techniques in the treatment of ULS. This study compared the perioperative characteristics of these interventions for patients with ULS. An IRB-approved chart review was performed from January 1999 to November 2018 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria included the diagnosis of ULS, treatment with either OCVR or DO using a posterior rotational flap technique, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria (12 OCVR and 5 DO). Patients in each cohort were found to have a similar distribution in sex, age at the time of surgery, synostosis laterality, weight, and length of follow-up. There was no significant difference in mean estimated blood loss/kg, surgical time, or transfusion requirements between cohorts. Distraction osteogenesis patients had a longer mean hospital length of stay (3.4 +/- 0.6 d versus 2.0 +/- 0.6 d, P = 0.0004). All patients were admitted to the surgical ward postoperatively. In the OCVR cohort, complications included 1 dural tear, 1 surgical site infection, and 2 reoperations. In the DO cohort, 1 patient had a distraction site infection, treated with antibiotics. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, or surgical time between OCVR and DO. Patients who underwent OCVR had a higher incidence of postoperative complications and the need for reoperation. This data provides insight into the perioperative differences between OCVR and DO in patients with ULS.

Delayed Presentation of Sagittal Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Sagittal craniosynostosis typically presents as dolichocephaly or less frequently as clinocephaly, a "saddle-shaped" phenotype. This project aimed to characterize clinically relevant differences between sagittal synostosis phenotypes and examine the etiology of the delay in presentation.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed from January 1999 to November 2018 at a single institution. Analyses examined correlations between subphenotype, time of presentation, minor suture fusion, developmental delay, and operative technique.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients diagnosed with single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis were identified. A total of 30.6% had a saddle phenotype (n = 49) and 69.4% had dolichocephaly (n = 111). Patients with the saddle phenotype were more likely to present with a developmental delay and to have at least 1 minor suture fused than patients with dolichocephaly were. Patients with the saddle phenotype presented for surgery at an older age and were more likely to undergo open cranial vault repair, with increased blood loss, higher transfusion volume, and longer time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights clinical differences in sagittal craniosynostosis phenotypes and shows that developmental delay is an initial presentation of the saddle phenotype. The saddle phenotype also correlated with fusion of the minor squamous and sphenoid sutures. The link between developmental delay and minor suture fusion was notable and should be explored with a larger sample size. Patients with saddle synostosis present for surgery at an older age than patients with dolichocephaly and therefore are more likely to receive open cranial vault repair, with a taxing intraoperative experience characterized by increased blood loss, increased transfusions, and longer operation time.

Analysis of Actual Versus Predicated Intracranial Volume Changes for Distraction Osteogenesis Using Virtual Surgical Planning in Patients With Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

The primary outcome metric in patients with craniosynostosis are changes in intracranial volumes (ICVs). In patients who undergo distraction osteogenesis (DO) to treat craniosynostosis, changes are also dependent on the length of distraction. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been used to predict anticipated changes in ICV during cranial vault reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to analyze the actual versus predicted ICV changes using VSP in patients who undergo DO for craniosynostosis management.

METHODS

All patients with craniosynostosis treated with DO at a single institution, Rady Children's Hospital, between December 2013 and May 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria are as follows: VSP planning with predicted postoperative ICV values and preoperative and postdistraction CT scans to quantify ICV. Postoperative ICV and VSP-estimated ICV were adjusted for age-related ICV growth. The primary outcome measure calculated was age-adjusted percent volume change per millimeter distraction (PVCPD), and results were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent DO for cranial vault remodeling. Nineteen patients were nonsyndromic, and 8 patients were syndromic. The median postoperative PVCPD was 0.30%/mm, and the median VSP-estimated PVCPD was 0.36% per millimeter (P < 0.001). A subanalysis of nonsyndromic patients showed a median postoperative PVCPD of 0.29%/mm in nonsyndromic patients that differed significantly from the VSP estimate of 0.34%/mm (P = 0.003). There was also a significant difference in syndromic patients' observed PVCPD of 0.41%/mm versus VSP estimate of 0.79%/mm (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning overestimates the change in ICV attributable to DO in both syndromic and nonsyndromic patients.

Orbital Volumetric Analysis in Patients With Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: A Comparison Between Distraction Osteogenesis and Fronto-Orbital Advancement

BACKGROUND

Unicoronal craniosynostosis is associated with orbital restriction and asymmetry. Surgical treatment aims to both correct the aesthetic deformity and prevent the development of ocular dysfunction. We used orbital quadrant and hemispheric volumetric analysis to assess orbital restriction and compare the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis with anterior rotational cranial flap (DO) and bilateral fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOAR) with respect to the correction of orbital restriction in patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of unicoronal craniosynostosis and treated with either DO or FOAR from 2000 to 2019 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative total orbital volumes, as well as quadrant and hemispheric volume ratios, were calculated from 3-dimensional head computed tomography scans. Selected preoperative and postoperative orbital measurements, including the maxillary length of the orbit (MLO; zygomaticofrontal suture to the top of zygomatic arch) and the sphenoid length of the orbit (SLO; the top of sphenoid suture to the top of zygomatic arch), were also obtained.

RESULTS

Data were available for 28 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Mean preoperative total orbital volume was significantly smaller on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (10.94 vs 12.20 cm3, P = 0.04). Preoperative MLO and SLO were significantly longer on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (MLO: 20.26 vs 17.75 mm, P < 0.001; SLO: 26.91 vs 24.93 mm, P = 0.01). Distraction osteogenesis and FOAR produced significantly different changes in orbital quadrant and/or hemispheric volume ratios on the nonsynostotic side but not on the synostotic side.

CONCLUSIONS

Before correction, patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis have significantly smaller total orbital volumes on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side and significantly greater MLO and SLO on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side. There is no significant difference between DO and FOAR with regard to correcting the observed orbital restriction in these patients.

Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Primary Alveolar Bone Grafts for Alveolar Clefts: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Alveolar bone grafting is utilized to manage alveolar clefts in patients with cleft lip and palate. However, the timing of bone grafting is variable with conflicting evidence supporting the use of primary alveolar bone grafting (PABG) in clinical practice.

PRIMARY AIM

To provide a qualitative systematic review analysis of long-term outcomes after PABG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative systematic review was performed following the Cochrane Handbook and reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Summative findings were evaluated using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research to assess the quality of evidence supporting the findings.

RESULTS

After removing duplication, 2182 publications were identified, and 2131 were excluded after screening through titles and abstracts. Inclusion criteria for this study included patients who underwent PABG at 24 months of age or younger and a minimum of 5 year follow-up. Thirty-two publications met the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative analysis. Primary outcome measures included cephalometric analysis, bone graft survival, occlusal analysis, hypomineralization, tooth eruption, radiograph analysis, and arch relationships. Four assessment themes were characterized from the systematic review: (1) bone graft survival, (2) craniofacial skeletal relationships, (3) occlusion and arch forms, and (4) recommendations for utilizing PABG in practice.

CONCLUSION

The reported systematic review provides evidence that performing PABG leads to poor long-term outcomes related to bone graft survival and maxillary growth restriction despite some reported positive outcomes.

Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Postmastectomy Radiated Patients: A Comparison between Delayed and Delayed Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction in a Predominantly Minority Patient Population

Background Delayed immediate (DI) autologous breast reconstruction consists of immediate postmastectomy tissue expander placement, radiation therapy, and subsequent autologous reconstruction. The decision between timing of reconstructive methods is challenging and remains to be elucidated. We aim to compare patient reported outcomes and quality of life between delayed and DI reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective review of all patients, who underwent autologous breast reconstruction at Montefiore Medical Center from January 2009 to December 2016, was conducted. Patients who underwent postmastectomy radiotherapy were divided into two cohorts: delayed and DI autologous breast reconstruction. Patients were mailed a BREAST-Q survey and their responses, demographic information, complications, and need for revisionary procedures were analyzed.

Results A total of 79 patients met inclusion criteria: 34.2% (n = 27) in the delayed and 65.8% (n = 52) in the DI group. 77.2% (n = 61) of patients were a minority population. Patients in each cohort had similar baseline characteristics; however, the DI cohort was more likely to have bilateral reconstruction (46.2% [n = 24] vs. 7.4% [n = 2]; p = 0.0005) and to have major mastectomy flap necrosis (22.4% [n = 17] vs. 0.0% [n = 0]; p = 0.002). Premature tissue expander removal occurred in 17.3% (n = 9) of patients in the DI group. BREAST-Q response rates were 44.4% (n = 12) in the delayed group and 57.7% (n = 30) in the DI group. Responses showed similar satisfaction with their breasts, well-being, and overall outcome.

Conclusion Delayed and DI autologous breast reconstruction yield similar patient-reported satisfaction; however, patients undergoing DI reconstruction have higher rates of major mastectomy necrosis. Furthermore, patients in the DI group risk premature tissue expander removal.

Comparison of SPECT/CT and planar MIBI in terms of operating time and cost in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism

We conducted a retrospective study to compare operating times and costs in patients who underwent guided parathyroidectomies with either (1) technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) multiplex ion-beam imaging (MIBI) parathyroid scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) fusion images or (2) sestamibi dual-phase (99m)Tc MIBI planar parathyroid scintigraphy alone preoperatively. Our study population was made up of the first 24 patients at our facility who had undergone SPECT/CT parathyroid imaging with technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) MIBI and a group of 24 patients who had undergone MIBI planar imaging alone. Patient demographics, preoperative laboratory test results, operating times, and hospital charges were analyzed. We found that less operating time was required for the planar MIBI group than in the SPECT/CT group (mean: 135 vs. 158 min), although the difference was not statistically significant. Likewise, the total cost of treatment was lower in the planar MIBI group (mean: $10,035 vs. $11,592); the difference was statistically significant by one measure (p × 0.02, Wilcoxon rank sum test) but not by another (p × 0.06, Student t test). Although SPECT/CT is efficient for patients with small and difficult-to-localize adenomas, it has yet to demonstrate greater efficacy or cost-effectiveness than planar MIBI for routine parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism when an easily identifiable parathyroid adenoma is localized.