Coronectomy of mandibular third molars: a clinical and radiological study of 231 cases with a mean follow-up period of 5.7 years

Residual enamel removal to improve outcomes of mandibular third molar coronectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to analyze post-coronectomy complications, chronological root survival rate (success rate) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and postoperative radiographic signs for root extraction. A total of 555 mandibular third molar coronectomies were clinically and radiologically evaluated (mean follow-up period, 27.2 months; range, 1 month to 10.5 years). Complications were observed in 22 (4.0%) cases. Temporary inferior alveolar nerve damage was observed in one (0.2%) case, and 21 (3.8%) retained roots required extraction between 1 and 64 months after coronectomy due to dry socket (two cases, 0.4%), primary non-wound closure (10 cases, 1.8%), secondary root exposure (seven cases, 1.3%), and submucosal root eruption (two cases, 0.4%). Residual enamel after coronectomy was more significantly found on 13 (61.9%) of 21 extracted roots than on 30 (5.6%) of 534 surviving roots. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an overall survival rate of 93.8% at 5 years and 92.2% at 10 years. The 5-year survival rates differed significantly (p < 0.001) between the enamel-free (97.0%) and residual enamel-attached (58.3%) roots. The Cox proportional hazards model showed a hazard ratio of 20.87 (95% confidence interval, 8.58-50.72). The long-term outcomes of coronectomy were satisfactory, and a higher success rate is expected when the enamel is completely removed during coronectomy.

The success rates and outcomes of mandibular third molar coronectomy: 167 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess success rates and to report complications of coronectomy of mandibular third molars (M3M), including intra-operative failure, pain, infection, dry socket, inferior dental alveolar (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) injuries and re-operation rates.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 167 coronectomies completed between January 2017 to December 2022 was undertaken.

RESULTS

The success of coronectomy was 93%. Intra-operative failure was reported to be 3.6% (n = 8). Complications accounted for pain (15%, n = 24), infection (9%, n = 15) and dry socket (3.6%, n = 6). Three patients required removal of M3M root at 3 months (n = 2) and 24 months (n = 1), accounting for 1.8% re-operation rate. A total of number of patients who suffered a nerve injury was 12; three of these were permanent (LN - 1.2%, n = 2; IAN - 0.6%, n = 1), nine were temporary (IAN - 1.2%; n = 2, LN - 2.4%; n = 4; site not specified - 1.8%, n = 3). No patients with intra-operative failure and re-operation suffered IAN or LN injury post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Coronectomy offers a successful strategy for management of high risk M3M. The treatment outcomes can be improved with careful case selection and adjusting surgical technique, including assessment of root morphology, incomplete crown sectioning technique and avoidance of lingual retraction. Reporting of coronectomy success as a factor of surgical outcome, presence or absence of permanent IAN injury, persistent symptoms or any other long-standing complications (such as LN injury), and the need for re-operation accounting for root migration status may be a useful tool to measure coronectomy outcomes.

Postoperative Outcome After Coronectomy Versus Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars - Clinical and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Coronectomy is an alternative procedure for removing mandibular third molars near the inferior alveolar nerve. Limited research exists on the effect of coronectomy on the postoperative quality of life (QoL).

PURPOSE

This study compared postoperative QoL after coronectomy and complete surgical removal of mandibular third molars during the first postoperative week.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

This prospective cross-over study was conducted in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department of Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands. The study sample consisted of patients with indications for removal of both mandibular third molars, with one at increased risk of nerve injury undergoing coronectomy, while the other molar was extracted. Exclusion criteria were ibuprofen allergy, anticoagulant therapy, systemic disease, local pathology, or failure to complete the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The independent variable was the surgical procedure, categorized as coronectomy or complete mandibular third molar removal. An 8-week period was maintained between procedures.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

The primary outcome measure was the mean OHIP-14 score during the first postoperative week. Secondary outcome measures were pain, self-perceived discomfort, and self-care behaviors.

COVARIATES

Sex, age, impaction patterns, and treatment order were analyzed as covariates.

ANALYSES

Nonparametric tests, including the Friedman test for within-patient differences and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for repeated measures, were used for non-normally distributed data. Significance was set at 5%, with P value adjustments per Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

The sample included 55 patients (18 male and 37 female) with a mean age of 24.6 ± 4.7 years. Mean OHIP-14 scores during the first 6 postoperative days were significantly higher after coronectomy compared to after surgical removal (day 1: 24.93 ± 9.82 vs 22.7 ± 9.5; day 6: 11.27 ± 10.36 vs 8.49 ± 10.93) (P < .05). Pain was significantly higher on the second to sixth postoperative days after coronectomy (day 2: 6.02 ± 1.92 vs 5.78 ± 1.73; day 6: 4.11 ± 2.49 vs 3.09 ± 2.41) (P < .05). Patients used more analgesics after coronectomy (day 2: 4.09 ± 2.53 vs 3.27 ± 1.9; day 6: 2.76 ± 2.62 vs 2.13 ± 2.49) (P < .05). We found no differences in outcomes for sex or molar impaction (P > .05).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Coronectomy significantly impacted postoperative oral health-related QoL compared to complete surgical removal of mandibular third molars.

Benefits of Coronectomy in Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare coronectomy versus extraction in patients at increased risk for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injuries associated with third molar removal in terms of IAN injury and other complications.

METHODS

The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across six databases and the gray literature from July 15 to August 01, 2022. We employed Rayyan software to identify and remove duplicate articles to ensure data integrity. Our research followed the strategy patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), outcome (O), and study (S): (P) patients needing lower third molar surgery at higher risk of IAN injury; (I) surgery options, coronectomy or complete extraction; (C) comparisons included reduced risks of nerve injuries, postoperative complications (pain, infection, alveolitis), and increased risks of reoperation, root migration, and extraction; (O) desired outcomes were preventing nerve injuries and reducing other surgical complications; and (S) observational study designs (cohort, case-control). Excluded from consideration were studies involving teeth other than lower third molars, as well as reviews, letters, conference summaries, and personal opinions. To gauge the certainty of evidence, we employed the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation instrument, selecting the most current papers with the highest levels of evidence for inclusion. The primary outcome variable of our study centered on evaluating the incidence of IAN injury, and secondly, the lingual nerve (LN) injury, the postoperative pain, infection, localized alveolitis, the necessity for surgical reintervention, root migration, and extraction. These assessments were carried out with respect to their chosen operative technique for managing third molars, either coronectomy or extraction, as predictor variables. We also considered covariates such as age, gender, and the presence of systemic diseases in our analysis to account for potential confounding factors. The pooled data underwent rigorous analysis utilizing an inverse variance method with both random and fixed effect models by the "metabin" function in the R program's meta-package. Additionally, we assessed the risk of bias in the selected studies by utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data and the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports.

RESULTS

Of the 1,017 articles found, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 were included in this study (29 cohort and 13 case-control studies), including 3,095 patients from 18 countries. The meta-analysis showed that coronectomy reduced the risk of IAN injury [OR (Odds Ratio): 0.14; 95% CI (confidence intervals): 0.06-0.30; I2 (inconsistency index) = 0%; P = .0001], postoperative pain (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.33-2.86; I2 = 81%; P = .01), and alveolitis (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.13-1.09; I2 = 32.2%; P = .01) when compared to complete tooth extraction. However, it also highlighted a greater risk of reintervention (OR: 5.38; 95% CI: 1.14-25.28; I2 = 0.0%; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that coronectomy is associated with a decreased risk for IAN injury and decreased pain and localized alveolitis when compared to complete tooth extraction. However, it is essential to acknowledge the higher likelihood of requiring reintervention with coronectomy. Therefore, clinicians should carefully consider the advantages and potential drawbacks of both techniques and tailor their choices to the unique clinical circumstances of each patient.

Accuracy of computer-assisted dynamic navigation when performing coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The study represents a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of the dynamic navigation system (DNS) in coronectomy of the mandibular third molar (M3M).

METHODS

The study included participants with an impacted M3M near the inferior alveolar canal. The coronectomy planes were designed before the surgery using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging data and then loaded into the DNS program. Intraoperatively, the navigation system was used to guide the complete removal of the target crown. Postoperative CBCT imaging was used to assess any three-dimensional deviations of the actual postoperative from the planned preoperative section planes for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (13 teeth) were included. The root mean square (RMS) deviation of the preoperatively designed plane from the actual postoperative surface was 0.69 ± 0.21 mm, with a maximum of 1.45 ± 0.83/-1.87 ± 0.63 mm deviation. The areas with distance deviations < 1 mm, 1-2 mm, and 2-3 mm were 71.97 ± 5.72 %, 22.96 ± 6.57 %, and 4.52 ± 2.28 %, respectively. Most patients showed extremely high convexity of the surface area located in the mesial region adjacent to the base of the extraction socket. There was no observable evidence of scratching of the buccolingual bone plate at the base of the extraction socket by the handpiece drill.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide preliminary support for the use of DNS-based techniques when extracting M3M using a buccal approach. This would improve the accuracy of coronectomy and reduce the potiential damage to the surrounding tissue.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

DNS is effective for guiding coronectomy.

What is the Incidence of Late Complications Associated With Lower Third Molar Coronectomy? 10-Year Follow-Up Results

PURPOSE

Coronectomy is an operation to manage impacted third molars (M3s) considered at high risk for mandibular nerve injury but long-term outcomes are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of late complications occurring within 10 years following lower M3 coronectomy.

METHODS

The investigators designed a prospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of 94 patients treated with coronectomy of third mandibular molars at the Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Bologna, from 2009 to 2012. This follow-up study included all of the patients from the original study who completed 10 years of follow-up. The primary outcome variables is postoperative late complication occurring between 5 and 10 years after coronectomy coded as present or absent. Late complications were defined as root exposure, nerve injury, pulpitis, periapical infection, and reoperation. The secondary outcome variable was probing pocket depth. Covariates examined were age, smoking and type of M3 impaction. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The inception cohort was composed of 94 subjects who had 116 coronectomies (k) completed. The study cohort was composed of subjects with 10 years of follow-up and included 48 subjects (k = 60) with a mean age of 28.99 ± 8.9 years. Between years 5 and 10 of follow-up, 2 subjects (4%) have complications; all root exposures diagnosed at years 8 or 9 after surgery. In another case root removal was required for orthodontics reason. No case of nerve injury to the inferior alveolar nerve occurred, and no periapical infection was observed around the residual roots. The mean 10-year probing pocket depth was 3.31 ± 0.92 mm (1,66-5,66 mm). There were too few complications to identify risk factors for late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Within all the limitations of this study, the results of this prospective study imply that coronectomy is a useful surgical technique for the treatment of M3s at high neurological risk, to avoid nerve injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. In addition, after coronectomy, retained roots did not develop late infection or periapical infection in the long term. However, in a few cases, removal of retained roots was required at 10 years, due to root migration in the oral cavity. The risk for late complications is uncommon, but persistent.

Early root migration after a mandibular third molar coronectomy

PURPOSE

This prospective cohort study aimed to assess early root migration after a coronectomy of the mandibular third molar at 2 and 6 months after surgery.

METHODS

We included all patients treated with a coronectomy of an impacted mandibular third molar. The primary outcome measure was the extent of postoperative root migration after 2 and 6 months. Migration was measured as the distance between the root complex and a fixed point on the inferior alveolar canal. The secondary aim was to identify factors (age, impaction pattern, and patient sex) that affected the extent of root migration.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five coronectomies were performed in 141 patients (96 females and 45 males; mean age 33.1 years, SD 16.0). The 2-month checkup was completed by 121 patients that received 141 coronectomies. The 6-month check-up was completed by 73 patients that received 80 coronectomies. The mean root migrations were 3.30 mm (SD 2.53 mm) at 2 months and 5.27 mm (SD 3.14 mm) at 6 months. In the 2-6-month interval, the mean root migration was 2.58 mm (SD 2.07 mm). The extents of migration were similar during the 0-2-month interval and the 2-6-month interval (p = 0.529). Younger age was associated with greater root migration, and females experienced significantly greater migrations than males (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Roots migrated more rapidly in the first two postoperative months, compared to the 2-6-month interval. Age was negatively correlated with the extent of root migration, and females showed significantly greater migrations than males.

Neurosensory Deficits of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Following Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: Comparison of One-Stage Complete Extraction with Two-Stage Partial Coronectomy Surgical Technique

Objectives

Inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory deficit is a worrisome complication of surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. A novel approach using two-stage partial coronectomy has been proposed as an alternative surgical procedure to reduce this complication. This study compared neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve following impacted mandibular third molar extraction using one-stage complete extraction with the two-stage partial coronectomy technique.

Material and Methods

Subjects with mesioangular or horizontal impacted mandibular third molar with an intimate relationship with inferior dental canal who met the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were divided into one-stage and two-stage partial coronectomy techniques. The subjects were evaluated for the presence of inferior alveolar neurosensory deficit, and the relationships of neurosensory nerve deficit with sex, age and type of impaction.

Results

Neurosensory deficit was observed in 5 subjects (7.8%), with all cases seen in the one-stage group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The relationship between the incidence of neurosensory deficit and age, sex, type of impaction, surgical difficulty, operating time and root morphology was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Findings from this study suggest partial coronectomy compared to one-stage complete extraction reduces the incidence of Inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory deficit.

Coronectomy of mandibular wisdom teeth: A case series

Introduction and importance

Coronectomy represents a common procedure performed in oral surgery, mostly involving the lower wisdom teeth when the extraction presents a risk of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve (NAI). The surgical approach can be described as a coronal separation of the tooth and leaving the roots intact in the socket.

The result is impressive with the disappearance of the symptomatology at first and especially the root migration, which occurs most frequently in the first 6 months.

Cases series presentation

We present a series of clinical cases of coronectomy involving the lower wisdom tooth which was performed by respecting the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative measures and whose indications were established correctly.

Discussion and conclusion

Besides the previously mentioned indication, this procedure can be associated with other clinical situations such as dentigerous cysts. However, there are several circumstances in which coronectomy is contraindicated.

According to our study, we can conclude that coronectomy of mandibular wisdom teeth represents a reassuring alternative to the preservation of NAI. Complications may occur but follow-up remains a key point in visualizing the progression of the roots away from the mandibular canal.

•

Coronectomy of mandibular wisdom teeth is one of the most common procedures performed in oral surgery.

•

The indications must be established before the operation, while respecting the contra-indications.

•

His success is dependent on the respect of the surgical measures

•

Follow-up is very important in order to control the evolution of the roots in relation to the mandibular canal

Novel strategy to predict high risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury during extraction of lower third molars based on assessment of computed tomographic images of multiple anatomical features

Preoperative assessment is essential to prevent inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during surgical extraction of the lower third molar (LM3). Here, we aimed to establish an assessment system to predict IAN injury during surgical extraction of the LM3. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 115 patients diagnosed as 'high-risk' based on our previous risk assessment method involving three anatomical features of the inferior alveolar canal using computed tomographic (CT) images. We evaluated the occurrence of neurosensory impairment in these high-risk patients, and its association with novel anatomic features based on CT images. Neurosensory impairments were observed in 19 patients (16.5%). The inferior alveolar canal major diameter (p < 0.0001) and lingual bone thickness (p = 0.0039) were significantly associated with the occurrence of neurosensory impairment during LM3 extraction. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cut-off values of these quantitative factors to specifically predict IAN injury. Preoperative risk assessment with quantitative factors based on anatomical features observed on CT images may facilitate more appropriate surgical planning for patients at a high risk of IAN injury.

Current thinking in lower third molar surgery

The removal of lower third molar teeth is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, but many concepts in this surgery have been unclear and have engendered different opinions. This paper aims to review current thinking in certain pertinent aspects of this surgery to update the reader on the most current research and synthesise it to make clinical recommendations. Topics covered include preoperative imaging, timing of removal, flap design, lingual retraction, coronectomy, lingual split, closure techniques, and use of antibiotics, steroids, and drains.

Does the Coronectomy a Feasible and Safe Procedure to Avoid the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury during Third Molars Extractions? A Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to review the literature on the coronectomy technique and evaluate the incidence of success and complications as a surgical approach for inferior third molars. Online databases were searched for data on the frequency of inferior alveolar nerve damage, lingual nerve damage, root migration, pain, infection, dry socket, and extraction of the remaining root, and data on the necessity of reintervention were also extracted. Randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, and prospective and retrospective studies with or without the control group were intercepted. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CDR 42020135485). Sixteen papers analyzed 2176 coronectomies in total, and only five of them were judged as appropriate according to methodological quality assessment. The incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury was documented in 0.59% of the procedures, lingual nerve injury in 0.22%, infection 3.95%, dry socket 1.12%, extraction of the root 5.28%, and reintervention 1.13%. The pain was the most reported, in 22.04% of the population. This study provides an overview of the clinical success and complications of coronectomy, and their prevalence. A coronectomy may be considered a low-risk procedure and an option for treatment to avoid potential damage to nervous structures. However, patients should still undergo a full screening and evaluation of postsurgical procedures.

Is it possible to filter third molar cases with panoramic radiography in which roots surround the inferior alveolar canal? A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) entrapment in third molar (M3) roots bears a significant risk for nerve injury. The aim of this study was to identify specific panoramic radiographic (PR) signs that can reliably identify IAN entrapment (IANE) root conformations. In a retrospective case-control study, 10 IANE and 218 non-IANE third molar risk cases were examined by PR and CBCT. The collected data included "classic" specific high-risk panoramic signs, number of M3 roots, extent of inferior alveolar canal (IAC)-root tip overlap, rotated position of M3 and impaction pattern. After bivariate analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) were calculated for the most significant predictive variables. Interruption of both cortical lines (LR⁺: 43.6; AUC: 96.0%) and upward diversion of the IAC (LR⁺: 36.3; AUC: 96.5%) were the most accurate single signs indicating IANE. Upward diversion combined with root darkening and interruption of the IAC (AUC: 97.4%) and the combination of darkening with interruption and with a rotated M3 (LR⁺:130.8; AUC: 97.8%) were the most accurate combinations predicting IANE. IANE may be correctly filtered with PR when focusing on the signs of upward diversion, darkening, interruption and rotated M3 position, especially in cases involving their multiple (≥3) presence. CBCT evaluation is highly recommended in these cases before partial and total tooth removals.

Displacement of the Inferior Alveolar Bundle Secondary to Post Coronectomy Root Migration: A Case Report

Intentional coronectomy has become a commonplace procedure as an alternative to full third molar removal in order to decrease the occurrence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. It is well known that one of the sequelae of this procedure is superior root migration. This is usually not a significant problem as the migrated roots may erupt to a position where they are more readily removed. This report presents a case in which a curvature at the apex of the root displaced the IAN causing neurologic symptoms.

Three-dimensional assessment of root migration and rotation patterns after coronectomy: bone-embedded roots versus soft tissue-covered roots

In this study, a three-dimensional evaluation was performed to explore differences between bone-embedded and soft tissue-covered roots after mandibular third molar (M3M) coronectomy. Patients were recruited according to the results of cone-beam computed tomography, 6 months after coronectomy. Completely bone-embedded M3Ms were assigned to group B, while completely soft tissue-covered M3Ms were assigned to group S. Data were recorded using digital software. A total of 213 M3Ms in 181 patients were investigated, of which 170 were assigned to the two study groups. Age was the primary factor influencing root migration (P<0.001). The smaller the degree of angulation of the M3M, the more likely was the root complex to rotate distally (r=-0.37, P<0.001). The depth of the impacted M3M contributed to the regeneration of new bone (P≤0.008). The length of the root complex (odds ratio 0.82, P=0.048) and distance from the root to the alveolar crest (odds ratio 1.23, P=0.026) were two critical factors influencing whether the root complex was bone-embedded. Ensuring that the length of the root complex is <7.6mm and the distance between the root and alveolar crest is ≥5mm were both found to be critical to the remaining root being completely bone-embedded and thus preventing eruption and the need for secondary surgery.

Computer-aided three-dimensional assessment of periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar after coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: a prospective study

Background

The periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar (M2M) after coronectomy of the M3M has shown controversial results. We aimed to combine a digital method with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and estimate periodontal healing of M2M after M3M coronectomy. An accurate and stable indicator in three dimensions was also explored tentatively.

Methods

Patients with a M3M in contact with the inferior alveolar canal were included. CBCT was applied immediately after coronectomy (baseline) and 6-months later. Data were investigated with digital software for registration. Previously reported and coronectomy-related factors were included for univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 181 patients (213 M3Ms) completed 6-month follow-up. Significant reduction in the distal intra-bony defect (DBD) depth of the M2M was shown (1.28 ± 1.24 mm, P < 0.001). DBD depth of the M2M at baseline was the most influential factor (r = 0.59), followed by preoperative M3M condition, age, rotation and migration of the root complex. Remaining enamel (OR = 6.93) and small retromolar space (0.67) contributed to re-contact of the root complex and M2M. Bone volume regenerated in the distal 2 mm was associated significantly with DBD-depth reduction (r = 0.74, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Bone volume regenerated in the distal 2 mm of the M2M denoted stability of distal periodontal healing of the M2M. DBD depth at baseline was the most influential factor for healing of a DBD of the M2M after M3M coronectomy. The remaining enamel and a small retromolar space could contribute to re-contact of the root complex and the M2M.

Trial registration

China Clinical Trial Center, ChiCTR1800014862. Registered 10 February 2018,

Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth

BACKGROUND

Pathology relating to mandibular wisdom teeth is a frequent presentation to oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and surgical removal of mandibular wisdom teeth is a common operation. The indications for surgical removal of these teeth are alleviation of local pain, swelling and trismus, and also the prevention of spread of infection that may occasionally threaten life. Surgery is commonly associated with short-term postoperative pain, swelling and trismus. Less frequently, infection, dry socket (alveolar osteitis) and trigeminal nerve injuries may occur. This review focuses on the optimal methods in order to improve patient experience and minimise postoperative morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative benefits and risks of different techniques for surgical removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.

SEARCH METHODS

Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register (to 8 July 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library; 2019, Issue 6), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 8 July 2019), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 8 July 2019). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. We placed no restrictions on the language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing different surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors were involved in assessing the relevance of identified studies, evaluated the risk of bias in included studies and extracted data. We used risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data in parallel-group trials (or Peto odds ratios if the event rate was low), odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data in cross-over or split-mouth studies, and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data. We took into account the pairing of the split-mouth studies in our analyses, and combined parallel-group and split-mouth studies using the generic inverse-variance method. We used the fixed-effect model for three studies or fewer, and random-effects model for more than three studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 62 trials with 4643 participants. Several of the trials excluded individuals who were not in excellent health. We assessed 33 of the studies (53%) as being at high risk of bias and 29 as unclear. We report results for our primary outcomes below. Comparisons of different suturing techniques and of drain versus no drain did not report any of our primary outcomes. No studies provided useable data for any of our primary outcomes in relation to coronectomy. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether envelope or triangular flap designs led to more alveolar osteitis (OR 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 1.23; 5 studies; low-certainty evidence), wound infection (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), or permanent altered tongue sensation (Peto OR 4.48, 95% CI 0.07 to 286.49; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). In terms of other adverse effects, two studies reported wound dehiscence at up to 30 days after surgery, but found no difference in risk between interventions. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of a lingual retractor affected the risk of permanent altered sensation compared to not using one (Peto OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.00 to 6.82; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). None of our other primary outcomes were reported by studies included in this comparison. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether lingual split with chisel is better than a surgical hand-piece for bone removal in terms of wound infection (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.21; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Alveolar osteitis, permanent altered sensation, and other adverse effects were not reported. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether there is any difference in alveolar osteitis according to irrigation method (mechanical versus manual: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.09; 1 study) or irrigation volume (high versus low; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.02; 1 study), or whether there is any difference in postoperative infection according to irrigation method (mechanical versus manual: RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.43; 1 study) or irrigation volume (low versus high; RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.37; 1 study) (all very low-certainty evidence). These studies did not report permanent altered sensation and adverse effects. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether primary or secondary wound closure led to more alveolar osteitis (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.40; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence), wound infection (RR 4.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 96.34; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), or adverse effects (bleeding) (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.47; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). These studies did not report permanent sensation changes. Placing platelet rich plasma (PRP) or platelet rich fibrin (PRF) in sockets may reduce the incidence of alveolar osteitis (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67; 2 studies), but the evidence is of low certainty. Our other primary outcomes were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this 2020 update, we added 27 new studies to the original 35 in the 2014 review. Unfortunately, even with the addition of these studies, we have been unable to draw many meaningful conclusions. The small number of trials evaluating each comparison and reporting our primary outcomes, along with methodological biases in the included trials, means that the body of evidence for each of the nine comparisons evaluated is of low or very low certainty. Participant populations in the trials may not be representative of the general population, or even the population undergoing third molar surgery. Many trials excluded individuals who were not in good health, and several excluded those with active infection or who had deep impactions of their third molars. Consequently, we are unable to make firm recommendations to surgeons to inform their techniques for removal of mandibular third molars. The evidence is uncertain, though we note that there is some limited evidence that placing PRP or PRF in sockets may reduce the incidence of dry socket. The evidence provided in this review may be used as a guide for surgeons when selecting and refining their surgical techniques. Ongoing studies may allow us to provide more definitive conclusions in the future.

Identification of Specific Panoramic High-Risk Signs in Impacted Third Molar Cases in Which Cone Beam Computed Tomography Changes the Treatment Decision

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment decisions of oral-maxillofacial surgeons in the management of impacted lower third molars (M3s) according to panoramic radiography (PR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) risk analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten surgeons analyzed 40 deliberately selected M3 cases showing 1 or more panoramic high-risk signs: 1) darkening of the root, 2) interruption of the white line, 3) diversion of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC), 4) narrowing of the IAC, and 5) 2 or more signs occurring simultaneously (including darkening and/or interruption of the IAC). After evaluating the PR images, the observers analyzed the patients' CBCT images. The treatment decision (extraction vs coronectomy) and surgical technique (number of planned tooth sections) were recorded.

RESULTS

On the CBCT coronal slices, direct contact between the M3 and IAC, together with narrowing and/or fenestration of the IAC, was observed most frequently when 2 or more panoramic signs were seen simultaneously on the PR images (odds ratio [OR], 7.2; P = .021). CBCT findings led to a significant decrease in the number of coronectomy decisions (23% vs 14.5%, P = .002), which was most prominent in the groups showing panoramic signs of darkening (approximately 50%, P = .007) and narrowing (approximately 66%, P = .044). A significant number of extraction decisions were modified to coronectomy when 2 or more panoramic signs occurred together (OR, 7.9; P < .001). However, there were no significant differences regarding the number of planned hypothetical tooth sections.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the surgeons' confidence in the treatment decision increased after CBCT imaging, resulting in fewer coronectomy decisions. CBCT information that changed a previous coronectomy decision to extraction was most frequently observed in cases showing darkening and narrowing PR signs. The chance of changing an extraction decision to a coronectomy decision after evaluating the patient's CBCT images was the highest when 2 or more PR signs were observed simultaneously.

Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal vs. coronectomy-a 3-year audit

OBJECTIVES

To assess: (1) the workflow in the treatment decision process of mandibular third molars based on a panoramic image and CBCT and (2) the impact of radiographic markers in CBCT on the decision to perform coronectomy.

METHODS

1437 teeth in 917 patients (mean age 27.8 years, range 18-72) underwent clinical and panoramic examination. If there was an indication for removal of the tooth, and signs of a close relation to the inferior alveolar nerve were present in the panoramic image, a CBCT was performed. Treatment decision based on panoramic image and CBCT was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to assess whether signs in CBCT had an impact on the treatment decision "coronectomy". Moreover, the actually operated teeth and post-operative sensory disturbances were assessed and discussed in relation to the radiographic method.

RESULTS

Based on the panoramic image, in 462 cases it was decided not to treat, 553 were scheduled for surgery, and 422 referred for a CBCT examination. "No bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal" seen in CBCT was the main factor influencing the decision to perform a coronectomy (odds ratio = 56.8, p < 0.001). 840 mandibular third molars had undergone surgical intervention, 152 had a coronectomy and 688 were fully removed. Six patients perceived a sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve: one permanent and five temporary.

CONCLUSION

29% of the examined cases were referred for a CBCT and of these, the majority were scheduled for coronectomy based on the sign "no bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal" seen in CBCT.

Evaluating the risk of post-extraction inferior alveolar nerve injury through the relative position of the lower third molar root and inferior alveolar canal

The aim of this study was to introduce a method to evaluate the risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury following the extraction of impacted lower third molars. Two hundred impacted lower third molars adjacent to the IAN were evaluated. These were divided into four classification groups according to preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings: AR, apical region; LT, lateral region of the tapered root; LE, lateral region of the enlarged root; AE, adjacent to the enlarged root. All teeth were dislocated along the long axis or arc of the root by tooth sectioning technique and extracted by a single surgeon. The primary outcome variable was postoperative neurosensory impairment of the IAN. The χ² test was used to evaluate differences in postoperative IAN injury between the classifications. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative IAN injury. The overall incidence of postoperative IAN injury was 7%. Specifically, most injuries involved classification AE (AE 36%, LE 8.6%, LT 3.6%, AR 0%), and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). Logistic regression showed that classification AE was the only risk factor for postoperative IAN injury (P< 0.001). According to preoperative CBCT, the risk of postoperative IAN injury is higher when the IAN is adjacent to the enlarged part of the root.

Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR)

OBJECTIVES

Lack of evidence on the use of CBCT for management of mandibular third molars in Radiation Protection guideline no. 172 of the European Commission made the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR) decide to update the recommendations of the guideline.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was performed addressing the following questions: (1) does CBCT change the treatment of the patient?; (2) does CBCT reduce the number of post-operative sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve?; and (3) can CBCT predict the risk for a post-operative sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve?

RESULTS: 

Since the European Commission published the guideline in 2012 several high-evidence studies on the use of CBCT before removal of mandibular third molars have been conducted including five randomized controlled clinical trials and one meta-analysis. Present literature allows to propose recommendations with highest level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

New and up-to-date evidence-based recommendations advocate that CBCT imaging of the mandibular third molar should not be applied as a routine method before removal of mandibular third molars and therefore, CBCT imaging should only be applied when the surgeon has a very specific clinical question in an individual patient case that cannot be answered by conventional (panoramic and/or intraoral) imaging.