Comprehensive treatment of massive macroglossia due to venous and lymphatic malformations

Surgery versus sclerotherapy versus combined therapy in head and neck lymphatic malformations in the pediatric population: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review current literature on the treatment of lymphatic malformations (LMs) of the head and neck to guide treatment strategy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature until 16 November 2021 was performed on treatments of LMs in the head and neck.

RESULTS

Out of 9044 articles, 54 studies were eligible for inclusion with 26 studies providing detailed participant data. A total number of 1573 patients with a mean age of 21.22 months were analysed. Comparative meta-analysis did not reveal significant differences two proportions of volume reduction (≥ 50% and 100%) between sclerotherapy and surgical treatment. Regression demonstrated that positive predictors for volume reduction were surgery 17 (95% CI 0.26-34; p = 0.047) and treatment of macrocystic lesions 19 (95% CI 5.5-32; p = 0.006). Treatment of mixed lesions also demonstrated a trend towards achieving a greater volume reduction (p = 0.052). A higher de Serres stage of the lesion had a negative effect on the amount of volume reduction - 3.7 (95% CI - 7.0 to - 0.35; p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in volume reduction between various treatment modalities at study level. However, individual patient data indicated that surgery and larger cyst types are associated with a significant higher percentage of volume reduction, whereas a higher de Serres stage negatively impacted the amount of volume reduction. These findings can be used for patient counseling and treatment planning based on cyst type and de Serres stage. However volume reduction constitutes just one objective within a more complex treatment spectrum.

Individualized treatment of congenital vascular malformations of the tongue

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Oral malformations of the tongue are exceedingly rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of individualized treatment for patients with vascular malformations of the tongue.

METHODS

This retrospective study is based on a consecutive local registry at a tertiary care Interdisciplinary Center for Vascular Anomalies. Patients with vascular malformations of the tongue were included. Indications for therapy of the vascular malformation were macroglossia with the impossibility to close the mouth, bleeding, recurrent infection and dysphagia. Size regression of the malformation (volume measurement) and symptom improvement were investigated.

RESULTS

Out of 971 consecutive patients with vascular malformations, 16 patients suffered from a vascular malformation of the tongue. Twelve patients had slow-flow malformations and 4 fast-flow malformations. Indications for interventions were bleeding (4/16, 25%), macroglossia (6/16, 37.5%), and recurrent infections (4/16, 25%). For two patients (2/16, 12.5%), there was no indication for intervention due to absence of symptoms. Four patients received sclerotherapy, 7 patients Bleomycin-electrosclerotherapy (BEST) and 3 patients embolization. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 7-35.5). In all patients, symptoms had decreased after two interventions at a median (IQR 1-3.75). Volume reduction of the malformation of the tongue was 13.3%(from median 27.9 cm3 to median 24.2 cm3, p = 0.0039), and even more pronounced when considering only patients with BEST (from 86 cm3 to 59.1 cm3, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Symptoms of vascular malformations of the tongue are improved after a median of two interventions with significantly increased volume reduction after Bleomycin-electrosclerotherapy.

The Oral Complications of COVID-19

Background: COVID-19 is a novel coronavirus infectious disease associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome. More and more patients are being cured due to the development of clinical guidelines for COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis, treatment, and vaccines. However, the long-term impact of COVID-19 on patients after recovery is unclear. Currently available reports have shown that patients recovered from COVID-19 continue to experience health problems in respiratory and other organ systems. Oral problem is one of the important complications which has serious impacts on the rehabilitation and future quality of life, such as ageusia and macroglossia, but the oral complication is often being neglected.

Aim of Review: From the perspective of stomatology, we summarized and elaborated in detail the types, pathogenesis of oral complications from COVID-19 patients after rehabilitation, and the reported prevention or treatment recommendations which may improve the COVID-19 patients associated oral diseases.

Key Scientific Concepts of Review: 1) To understand the common oral complications and the mechanisms of the development of oral complications after the COVID-19 recovery; 2) To summary the practical strategies to prevent the oral complications and construct the rehabilitation plans for patients with oral complications.