Are women more susceptible than men to iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injury in dental implant surgery?

Permanent lingual nerve injury after dental procedures: a retrospective study of 228 patients

Lingual nerve injury (LNI) is a rare, serious complication and previous studies include limited numbers of cases. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the neurosensory outcomes for a large patient cohort with permanent LNI and correlate the mechanism of injury (surgical vs non-surgical) to neurosensory characteristics. Demographics, procedural parameters, mandibular third molar (M3) position, surgeon type, neurosensory test results, and symptoms were recorded for 228 patients and analysed. The majority were female (67.1%). Overall, 59.6% of LNIs were caused by M3 removal and 36.4% by local anaesthesia. Complete loss occurred more frequently in surgical LNIs (P = 0.013). The presence of pain did not differ significantly, however the burning type of pain was significantly more frequent in non-surgical LNIs (P = 0.008) along with altered gustation (P = 0.025). The most common M3 position related to LNI was distoangular (40.4%), class III (63.2%), level A (58.1%) (Winter/Pell and Gregory classifications). The majority of patients undergoing M3 removal were >24 years. A total of 71.7% showed no sign of recovery and 5.5% reported further impairment in their condition. Overall, nine patients underwent microsurgical repair. This study presents neurosensory characteristics potentially decisive for timely referral of operable LNIs.

Surgical outcomes of the surgical techniques following management of iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injuries: A systematic review

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of the microsurgical treatment in restoring full sensory recovery following trigeminal nerve injuries caused by iatrogenic oral and maxillofacial surgical interventions.

Methods

A detailed search was conducted on the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Medline and Embase. Clinical studies with at least twelve months of follow up were included and assessment of risks of bias was made using the Robbin I assessment tool.

Results

Six studies were identified in the searches which include 227 patients. The lingual nerve was the most common injured nerve, followed by the inferior alveolar nerve. Third molar removal was the most frequent cause of nerve injury, followed by root canal treatment, pathology excision, coronectomy, orthognathic surgery, dental implants and then local anaesthetic injections. Overall, surgical interventions for nerve injuries showed neurosensory improvement postoperatively in the majority of patients.

Conclusion

Direct neurorrhaphy is still the gold-standard technique when the tension at the surgical site is minimal. Promising results have been noted on conduit applications following traditional repair or grafting. Further research is needed on the efficacy of allografting and conduit applications in nerve repair.

The nature of malpractice claims related to nerve damage after dental implants insertion in Israel during 2005-2020: A descriptive study

INTRODUCTION

Dental implant placement is a routine practice in dentistry, with a possible uncommon risk of neurosensory injury. The present study analyzed all dental implant claims involving sensory nerve disturbances between 2005 and 2020 in Israel. The study was conducted to understand implant risk management better and improve the patient's safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All legal claims registered by Medical Consultant International (MCI) involving nerve damage claims between 2005 and 2020 were included in the study. The data included demographic details such as age, sex, event date, claim delivery date, and treatment settings. Information on the nerve damage included the damaged nerve, side of injury, and the number of implants performed in the same surgery.

RESULTS

There were 218 claims regarding nerve damage out of 1154 claims for dental implant therapy. The mean age for nerve damage claims was 54.1 ± 11 years. There were more female than male claims (p = 0.02), with 87% of cases concerning damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (p < 0.0001), out of those molar areas being more frequently involved in nerve damage (64.3%, p < 0.0001). The left side was 1.4 times more frequent than the right side (p = 0.043). The risk for nerve injury was 7.4 times higher when placing multiple implants compared to single dental implant (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that placement of multiple implants, left-side implant placement, and patient gender may increase risk for a malpractice claim for neurosensory disturbances.

Titanium Dental Implants: An Overview of Applied Nanobiotechnology to Improve Biocompatibility and Prevent Infections

This review addresses the different aspects of the use of titanium and its alloys in the production of dental implants, the most common causes of implant failures and the development of improved surfaces capable of stimulating osseointegration and guaranteeing the long-term success of dental implants. Titanium is the main material for the development of dental implants; despite this, different surface modifications are studied aiming to improve the osseointegration process. Nanoscale modifications and the bioactivation of surfaces with biological molecules can promote faster healing when compared to smooth surfaces. Recent studies have also pointed out that gradual changes in the implant, based on the microenvironment of insertion, are factors that may improve the integration of the implant with soft and bone tissues, preventing infections and osseointegration failures. In this context, the understanding that nanobiotechnological surface modifications in titanium dental implants improve the osseointegration process arouses interest in the development of new strategies, which is a highly relevant factor in the production of improved dental materials.