The effect of anti-adhesive packing agents in the middle ear of guinea pig

Intratympanic Gels for Inner Ear Disorders: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

Intratympanic injections are a safe, well tolerated procedure routinely performed by ENT's specialists. Intratympanic injections of gels have the potential to deliver therapeutics into the cochlea through the round window membrane prolonging the release of drugs in the inner ear compartment. Aim of the present review is to summarize clinical trials testing pharmacological treatments for inner ear pathologies through intratympanic gel formulations.

DATA SOURCES

Online databases (Google scholar and PubMed) and registers (Clinicaltrials.gov and Euclinicaltrial) were used to identify clinical trials performed between 1990 and 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

PRISMA criteria have been followed. Clinical trials testing gel formulations administered through local intratympanic injections and targeting inner ear disorders were included. All the reports were identified by the authors working in pairs sequentially selecting only studies respecting the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 45 clinical studies have been noticed; the gels for intratympanic injection are in the form of poloxamers or hyaluronic acid combinations; the trials found target different kind of inner ear disorders: acquired-stable SNHL, tinnitus, acute sudden SNHL, Meniere disease, cisplatin induced ototoxicity and hearing preservation in patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery.

CONCLUSION

Few studies listed do not provide the specific kind of gel formulation used but only report the intratympanic delivery vehicle as "gel" or "thermogel". Multiple clinical studies have been targeting several forms of inner ear disorders by injecting different compounds through poloxamer and hyaluronic acid formulations. Larger and more advanced clinical stages are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these chemical compounds.

Use of hyaluronic acid matrix in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty

Augmentation rhinoplasty sometimes is required for patients with saddle nose deformity caused by failed rhinoplasty or facial trauma; finding appropriate grafting material remains a significant problem for this procedure. We investigated hyaluronic acid matrix as an allograft for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty in a rabbit model. We performed an osteotomy on the nasal bones of eight rabbits. Four animals were sham operated as the control group and four were administered a mixture of saline-gelled hyaluronic acid matrix and sliced cartilage. Ultrasonography and three-dimensional reconstruction tomography were performed at the end of the experimental period. After sacrifice of the animals, nasal tissues were examined for histopathology, and both collagen scores and number of capillaries were compared between the two groups. Increased collagen and capillaries were apparent in the hyaluronic acid matrix group compared to controls. The median collagen score was significantly greater for the hyaluronic acid matrix group than for the control group. Although the number of capillaries for the hyaluronic acid matrix group was greater than for the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three weeks is sufficient for adhesion of ends of fractures in clinical practice; however, we found no ossification at this time in either group. A hyaluronic acid matrix may be a useful alternative supplement for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Development of collagen was commensurate with membranous ossification; however, assessment of complete ossification requires a longer experimental period.

Efficacy of gelfoam middle ear packing in type-1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the surgical outcomes of type-1 tympanoplasty with and without gelfoam middle ear packing.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were screened from inception until October 2022. The included RCTs were evaluated for risk of bias, and the quality of each outcome was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs with 773 participants (gelfoam = 381 and non-gelfoam = 392) were analyzed. The overall study quality varied: low risk (n = 4 RCTs), some concerns (n = 3 RCTs), and high risk (n = 2 RCTs). There were no significant differences between both arms regarding the graft uptake rate (moderate certainty), hearing improvement rate (moderate certainty), type of impedance audiometry (moderate certainty), and ear discharge (low certainty). The mean change in air-bone gap was significantly higher in the non-gelfoam arm compared with the gelfoam arm (low certainty). However, the non-gelfoam group had superior hearing improvement in only the early postoperative period (i.e., one month); however, after two, three, and six months, there were no significant differences between both arms. The rate of ear fullness was significantly higher in the gelfoam arm compared with the non-gelfoam arm (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing type-1 tympanoplasty, the surgical outcomes did not significantly differ between both arms. The practice of middle ear packing with gelfoam needs to be standardized.

Effects of hyaluronic acid on the bone healing after lateral osteotomy: an experimental animal model

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative comfort of the patients undergoing rhinoplasty might be poor because of edema and ecchymosis caused by lateral osteotomy. In this animal experiment, we aimed at performing a quantitative assessment of effects of hyaluronic acid usage on healing process of lateral osteotomy.

METHODS

Fourteen New Zealand rabbits with a weight of 2000-2500 kg and an age of 8-12 weeks were included. Under anesthesia, nasal dorsums were exposed with midline incision and lateral osteotomies on both sides were performed using a 2 mm chisel. A hyaluronic acid-based mesh (Hyalonect^®) (1 × 1 cm) was embedded on the left osteotomy areas of all rabbits. Right osteotomy areas were left blank as control group. Collagen density and capillary development were quantitatively compared.

RESULTS

Convergence of fracture lines was observed in 6 (60%) of 10 samples from Hyalonect^® group, while was observed in 4 (40%) of 10 samples from control group. Although a higher rate of convergence was seen in the Hyalonect^® group (60% vs 40%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). Median collagen score was 2 (1-3) in the Hyalonect^® group and 1 (1-2) in the control group. Median capillary count value was 4 (1-23) in the Hyalonect^® group and 3 (1-17) in the control group. Both collagen score and capillary count values were significantly greater in the in the Hyalonect^® group compared with the control group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The effects of hyaluronic acid-based meshes on the bone healing process of the lateral osteotomy area might be investigated furthermore, on more comprehensive studies, as a material facilitating collagen organization and capillary development.

Is gelfoam sealing necessary in stapes surgery?

BACKGROUND

Sealing the oval window around the piston after fenestration with Gelfoam^® is a common practice in stapes surgery for otosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the effect of using or not using Gelfoam^® as a sealing material.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 418 patients who underwent stapes surgery from 2013 until 2019. Data were collected from medical records in a tertiary centre. 215 cases in the Gelfoam group and 203 cases in the control group without sealing were included. The main comparisons were made between these two groups in terms of vestibular (primary outcome) and audiological outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 47 years with a mean follow up of 50 months and a female predominance (65.6%, p = .049). There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative vertigo (11.6% vs 8.4%) or audiological outcomes in between Gelfoam and control group respectively. The average postoperative air-bone gap in the Gelfoam group was 4.6 dB vs. 5.3 dB in the control group (p = .634).

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

No difference were identified in vestibular or audiological outcomes during stapes surgery when using or not using Gelfoam^® in the middle ear.

Comparison of functional outcomes of cartilage tympanoplasty with silastic sheet versus Gelfoam packing in middle ear

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tympanoplasty is a common surgery in otorhinolaryngology field. In majority of procedures, in addition to the graft used for closure of tympanic membrane, a packing material is essential to be placed in the middle ear cavity. The main goals of packing can be summarized as providing support to the tympanic membrane and ossicular grafts, aeration of middle ear cavity and hemostasis. Several packing materials are currently available for using in middle ear surgeries. Each agent is associated with particular advantages and disadvantages, so choosing the proper packing agent is essential in tympanoplasty surgeries. In this study we aimed to compare two common packing materials (Gelfoam and silastic sheets) in cartilage tympanoplasty surgeries.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this block-randomized clinical trial, 78 patients undergoing tympanoplasty in Vali-e-asr hospital in 2017 and 2018 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to silastic sheet or gelfoam groups. The functional outcomes were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS.

RESULTS

Success was achieved in 32 (82.1%) patients and 34 (87.2%) patients in gelfoam and silastic sheets' groups, respectively (p = 0.530). The perforation area percentage was significantly lower (P = 0.007) in Gelfoam group. The other parameters were statistically the same in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, Gelfoam and silastic sheet methods had similar efficacy in cartilage tympanoplasty. Using each method depends on the preferrence of surgeon and patients' characteristics. Multi-center studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more conclusive results.

Hyaluronic acid in otology: Its uses, advantages and drawbacks - A review

OBJECTIVES

Review of the literature for studies involving the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) in otology.

METHODS

Pubmed and OvidMedline were searched using a combination of the following words in different variations: hyaluronic acid, hyaluronate, otolaryngology, otology, ear, tympanic membrane, perforation, tympanostomy, tympanoplasty, myringoplasty, packing, middle ear, cochlea, gene delivery, gene therapy, cochlear implant, hearing loss, meniere, vertigo, otitis and cholesteatoma.

RESULTS

The papers relevant for this review were triaged based on abstracts and titles and were then categorized based on topic/disease entity/procedure. The papers were read and summarized in order to use their findings in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

HA is being recently used as adjuvant therapy for multiple inflammatory conditions and in tissue repair. These immunomodulatory properties and biocompatibility have interested researchers specially in the field of otology for repair, gene delivery, immunomodulation etc. Recent data in the field show optimistic results for the use of HA in several conditions especially tympanic membrane perforations and gene delivery. It also establishes the role of HA as ancillary treatment in many other otologic pathologies. This review presents the most recent findings on the use of HA in otology. The results could be used to guide clinical practice and incite further research based on the presented results of the literature.

A Study on Outcome of Myringoplasty in Dry Ear (Quiescent/Inactive CSOM) Without Using Gelfoam in Middle Ear

Myringoplasty is a common surgery done for patients with tympanic membrane perforation in our clinical practice. This study was done to know the outcome of myringoplasty done without using gelfoam as a scaffold material. Simultaneously other parameters influencing the outcome were analysed. In a total of 80 patients assessed over 25 months were divided into test and control group by quasi randomisation. All patients underwent endoscopic underlay myringoplasty. Control groups had gelfoam bed created with gelfoam, whereas the test group only middle ear air pocket created with a proper seal without using gelfoam. The study revealed that without using gelfoam and creating a good middle ear air pocket the results were comparable to the method of using middle ear gelfoam bed. Also few insights and understanding regarding the parameters we need to asses preoperatively were also observed. With comparable healing and hearing results without using gelfoam in the middle ear, the normal physiology is restored in the postoperative period much earlier. The result of the surgery also becomes evident in the second postoperative week when the use of gelfoam in the middle ear is avoided.

The effects of different packing materials on healing and hearing after trauma to middle ear mucosa, an experimental study in rats

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of Spongostan, Otopore, Spongostan soaked with dexamethasone and Spongostan soaked with Hyaluronic acid (HA) as middle ear packing material after mucosal trauma.

METHODS

Twenty rats were divided into 4 groups. In control group (group 1), the middle ear cavities of animals were bilaterally packed with Spongostan; in group 2, with Otopore; in group 3, with Spongostan soaked with dexamethasone; and in group 4, with Spongostan soaked with HA. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were performed preoperatively and 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Histological analyses were performed to evaluate the inflammatory reaction and wound healing in the middle ear cavity.

RESULTS

ABR recordings demonstrate that threshold level changes from baseline were minor in Otopore and Spongostan soaked with dexamethasone packed ears. Threshold levels were higher in the Spongostan and Spongostan soaked with HA packed ears compared with both Otopore and Spongostan soaked with dexamethasone packed ears. Histological analyses showed that Spongostan caused inflammation more intense than Otopore and Spongostan soaked with dexamethasone. Residual material at postoperative week 6, new bone formation and adhesion were common in the Spongostan group compared with other groups. Fibrosis was more common in Spongostan group compared with other groups but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Otopore appears to be safe and effective for use in otologic surgery. The inflammation, adhesion and new bone formation decreased when Spongostan was used with steroid or HA, when compared to Spongostan alone.

Topical platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid during fat graft myringoplasty

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of adding platelet rich plasma (PRP) or Hyaluronic acid (HA) to fat graft myringoplasty (FGM) for medium sized central tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted on 69 patients with medium sized central TM perforations. In 21 patients, PRP was used with the FGM; and in 23 patients, HA was used with the FGM; while in 25 patients, pure FGM was performed without adding an enhancing material.

RESULTS

Successful TM perforation repair was achieved in 18 ears (85.7) with using PRP with FGM and in 20 ears (87%) with using HA with FGM and in 15 ears (60%) with pure FGM.

CONCLUSION

FGM with adding PRP or HA is more successful in closure of TM perforation than pure FGM in case of medium sized central TM perforation.

Effect of esterified hyaluronic acid as middle ear packing in tympanoplasty for adhesive otitis media

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of middle ear packing agents (MEPA) on post-operative hearing improvement and complications after tympanoplasty in patients with adhesive otitis media (OM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with adhesive OM who underwent tympanoplasty surgery were enrolled in the study between January 2012 and January 2015. A total of 205 patients who received canal wall-down tympanoplasty with ossicular chain reconstruction were randomized into one of the three groups with different MEPA. Group 1 (n = 72) received MeroGel as the MEPA, Group 2 (n = 64) cartilage, and Group 3 (n = 69) both. Air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were measured, and air-bone gaps (ABG) were analyzed before and after the surgery for each patient.

RESULTS

Mean pre- and post-operative ABG was 30.9 dB and 17.6 dB in Group 1, 31.4 dB and 21.9 dB in Group 2, and 32.2 dB and 19.1 dB in Group 3. The ABG closure was 13.3 ± 7.5 in Group 1, 9.5 ± 5.9 in Group 2, and 13.1 ± 9.3 in Group 3. The improvement of ABG after surgery was statistically significant in all three groups (p < .05). The ABG closure was statistically significantly smaller in Group 2 than in other two groups (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tympanoplasty using esterified hyaluronic acid (i.e. MeroGel) or cartilage as the MEPA resulted in improved hearing for patients with conductive hearing loss due to adhesive OM. Using MeroGel as the MEPA appeared to achieve a better post-operative outcome than using cartilage.

Safety and Efficacy of Chitosan-Dextran Hydrogel in the Middle Ear in an Animal Model

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of chitosan-dextran hydrogel (CDH) in preventing postoperative adhesions between the tympanic membrane (TM) and intratympanic structures, and to evaluate its ototoxicity in an animal study.

METHODS

In the first step, ototoxicity was evaluated with 7 male albino guinea pigs (GPs) via auditory brainstem responses (ABR) before and 4 weeks after unilateral intratympanic injection of CDH and saline solution contralaterally. In the second step, 12 GPs underwent bilateral ear surgery. The middle ear (ME) mucosa was abraded, and the cavity was filled with CDH on one side and packed with Gelfoam on the contralateral side. A control group of 6 GPs underwent the same procedure except that no material was applied in the ME. The animals were euthanized at the end of the 7th week, and otomicroscopic findings were noted and the temporal bones harvested for the histologic examination. The findings were scored and compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the pre- and postoperative ABR thresholds. In the otomicroscopic findings, the most prominent difference between the two groups was the presence of retraction of the TM in the Gelfoam group. The histopathologic findings revealed a higher degree of inflammation in the Gelfoam group compared with the CDH group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that CDH has no ototoxic effects in GPs. Its use as an ME packing material revealed significantly less TM retraction and inflammatory reaction compared with Gelfoam.

Antifibrotic effect of dexamethasone/alginate-coated silicone sheet in the abraded middle ear mucosa

Silicone sheet is a material which is commonly used in middle ear surgery to prevent the formation of adhesions between the tympanic membrane and the medial bony wall of the middle ear cavity. However, silicone sheet can induce a tight and hard fibrous capsule in the region of the stapes, and this is particularly common in cases of eustachian tube dysfunction. As a result of the fibrous encapsulation around the silicone sheet, postoperative aeration of the stapes can be interrupted causing poor hearing gain. In this study, we performed an in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antifibrotic effects of a dexamethasone and alginate (Dx/alginate) coating on silicone sheet. The Dx/alginate-coated silicone sheets were fabricated using a plasma-treatment and coating method. The Dx/alginate-coated silicone sheets effectively limited in vitro fibroblast attachment and proliferation due to the controlled release of Dx, which can be modified by manipulation of the alginate coating. For the in-vivo evaluation, guinea pigs (albino, male, weighing 250g) were divided into two groups, with the control group (n=5) implanted with silicone sheet and the test group (n=5) receiving Dx/alginate-coated silicone sheet. Animals were sacrificed 3 weeks after implantation, and histological analysis was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining techniques. Dx/alginate-coated silicone sheets showed marked inhibition of fibrosis in both the in vitro and in vivo studies. Silicone sheet that incorporates a Dx/alginate coating can release Dx and inhibit fibrosis in the middle ear. This material could be utilized in middle ear surgery as a means of preserving proper aeration and hearing gain following ossiculoplasty.

Antiadhesive effect of polyurethane foam packing in the guinea pig middle ear

CONCLUSIONS

No significant subepithelial healing differences were found between Gelfoam and polyurethane foam (PUF). However, levels of hyperplasia of the mucosal lining and inflammation were lower with PUF packing. PUF packing is not feasible as a middle ear packing material for abraded mucosa. Further studies are required before clinical application.

OBJECTIVE

To date, there have been few reports on the antiadhesive effect of PUF as a middle ear packing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the antiadhesive effect of PUF soaked with saline in an animal model of mucosal trauma.

METHODS

Bioresorbable PUF soaked with saline was placed over abraded mucosa in the experimental group (n = 7), and compressed Gelfoam soaked with saline was placed in the control group (n = 7). After measurement of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), the animals were sacrificed 3 weeks after packing placement for histological observation.

RESULTS

The ABR results at postoperative week 3 showed no statistically significant difference between the preoperative and post-packing values. An adhesion pattern with subepithelial thickening was observed in the control group. Adhesion was not observed in the experimental group; however, subepithelial fibrous thickening was noted.

Antiadhesive effect of bioresorbable polylactide film in abraded middle ear mucosa

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Polylactide film (PLF) is used to prevent postoperative peridural adhesion in spinal surgery. Up until now, the antiadhesive effect of bioresorbable PLF in ear middle surgery has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiadhesive effect of PLF in guinea pigs serving as a model for middle ear mucosal trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The animals were divided into two groups: the PLF group and the silastic sheeting group. There were seven guinea pigs (fourteen ears) in both groups. Under aseptic conditions, the middle ear mucosa was abraded using a pick inserted transbullaly. A PLF or silicone sheet was then placed into the guinea pigs' middle ear cavities. The auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were assessed preoperatively and at three weeks postoperatively while the animals were under general anesthesia. A histopathological study was performed 3 weeks after the operation.

RESULTS

The difference between the ABR results before the operation and three weeks postoperatively were not statistically significant. The adhesion formation did not appeared in either group. Prominent fibrous capsule formation and inflammation were observed in the silastic sheeting group, but not in the PLF group. Mild fibrous thickening of regenerated mucosa was observed in the PLF group.

CONCLUSION

From our results, bioresorbable PLF is nonototoxic and biocompatible with the guinea pig's middle ear cavity by short-term evaluation. Further long-term evaluation study is necessary before clinical application.

Mucosal trauma induced apoptosis in guinea pig middle ear: comparision of hemostatic agents

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of the absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS), microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH), and Ankaferd on wound healing after middle ear trauma and to evaluate their ototoxicity in an experimental guinea pig model.

METHODS

Middle ear mucosal trauma was created in 21 healthy adult guinea pigs. MPH, Ankaferd, and AGS were applied into the right tympanic bulla of the guinea pigs (7 ears for each treatment modality). The left ears of the seven animals were used as the sham group. At the fourth postoperative week (28-30 days), the guinea pigs were decapitated. Apoptosis was investigated, and the expression of Bcl-xl, Apaf, p53, cytochrome 3, and caspase 3 were evaluated.

RESULTS

The Ankaferd and AGS groups demonstrated significantly lower epithelial thickness, inflammation, and capillary dilatation than did the control group (p<0.001, <0.001, /0.001, <0.001/, 0.005, and 0.005, respectively). A statistically significant decrease in Bcl-xl staining was observed in the middle ears of animals treated with MPH (p=0.003). There was significantly higher caspase 3 expression in the Ankaferd and AGS groups than in the control group (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Light microscopy indicates that Ankaferd and AGS create less inflammation and increased caspase expression, which seems to induce inflammatory cell apoptosis. Ankaferd seems to be a promising hemostatic agent in otology.

Histological analysis of the effects of anti-adhesive haemostatic agents on the middle ear of the guinea pig

INTRODUCTION

Adhesion formation is a frequent and serious post-operative problem in ENT surgery. This study assessed the effect of two anti-adhesive haemostatic agents on an experimental guinea pig model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The middle-ear mucosa of 14 guinea pigs was exposed to surgical trauma. After surgery, Arista™ AH was injected into the right middle ear of seven animals, while Ankaferd Blood Stopper was injected into the right middle ear of the other seven animals. The left ears were left untreated and regarded as the control group. The three groups were compared by histological examination at post-operative week 4.

RESULTS

In each of the three groups, consolidation of the lamina propria and epithelium mucosae, increments in the number of active fibroblasts, collagen fibrils and inflammatory cells, and increased vascular dilation were observed on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and were more prominent in the control and Ankaferd Blood Stopper groups. Epithelial thickness and capillary vasodilation were significantly lower in the Arista™ AH group compared with the control and Ankaferd Blood Stopper groups (p < 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Arista™ AH may prevent the formation of adhesions in middle-ear surgery. Further experimental studies are required to determine its ototoxic potential.

Update on otitis media - prevention and treatment

Acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion are common childhood disorders, a source of significant morbidity, and a leading cause of antibiotic prescription in primary health care. Although effective treatments are available, some shortcomings remain, and thus better treatments would be welcome. Recent discoveries within the field of otitis media research relating to its etiology and pathogenesis have led to further investigation aimed at developing novel treatments. This article provides a review of the latest evidence relating to the understanding of acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion, current treatment strategies, their limitations, new areas of research, and novel strategies for treatment.

Effect of anti-adhesion barrier solution containing ciprofloxacin-hydrocortisone on abraded mucosa with otitis media

OBJECTIVE

No study to date has assessed the anti-adhesive effect of new middle ear (ME) packing agents in. This study compared the anti-inflammatory and anti-adhesive effect of antibiotic-steroid containing packing agents in abraded mucosa of the ME inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transbullar injection of a saline suspension of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced otitis media. ME mucosa of guinea pigs was abraded using a pick 30 min after LPS inoculation. The animals were divided into four groups of 10 guinea pigs each. In group A, ME cavity was preserved without any packing. In group B, ME cavity was packed with soluble hyaluronic acid-carboxymethyl cellulose (HA-CMC). In group C, the ME cavity was packed with soluble HA-CMC. In group D, the ME cavity was packed with antibiotic-steroid containing soluble HA-CMC. Otoendoscopic examination, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), and radiographic examination using computerized tomography (CT) were performed at 2 weeks post-surgery. Histopathological evaluation for ME mucosa was performed by light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Otoendoscopic findings and CT findings revealed that group D showed the best recovery of aeration in the ME compared to other groups. Recovery of ABRs threshold was significantly attenuated in group D. In LM and SEM findings, group D showed normalized mucosal thickening compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

ME packing by antibiotic-steroid containing soluble HA-CMC may be useful in the abraded mucosa of the ME inflammation.

Effects of middle ear packing with collagen polyvinylpyrrolidone and hyaluronic acid in guinea pigs

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate otoscopic and microscopic changes produced on the healthy mucosa of the middle ear (ME) and tympanic membrane (TM) of guinea pigs after packing with a collagen polyvinylpyrrolidone (CPVP) sponge soaked in hyaluronic acid (HA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 24 guinea pigs, myringotomy on the right side was created and the ME was packed as follows: Group I (n = 6): Absorbable gelatin sponge (AGS) soaked in saline solution; Group II (n = 6): AGS sponge soaked in HA, Group III (n = 6): CPVP sponge soaked in saline solution, Group IV (n = 6): CPVP sponge soaked in HA. Four weeks after miringotomy, the ME and TM integrity and residual packing material were evaluated otoscopically. Histologically, we evaluated inflammatory changes on the ME mucosa.

RESULTS

All animals in Groups I and II showed residual packing material (p < .001 ANOVA, TUKEY). Histologically, more inflammation was observed in Groups I, II, and III than in Group IV (p < .001 ANOVA, TUKEY). Group IV showed greater fibroblastic reaction (p < .02, ANOVA, TUKEY) versus other groups.

CONCLUSION

The CPVP sponge soaked in HA used as ME packing material is biocompatible and nontoxic, because it produces minimal inflammatory changes on the healthy mucosa of the ME and TM of guinea pigs. However, more research with injured mucosa is needed to validate its usefulness in otosurgery.

Seprafilm® adhesion barrier: (1) a review of preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies

The aim of this study was to provide a single site resource for investigators, clinicians, and others seeking preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies concerning the postsurgical, anti-adhesion barrier Seprafilm™ (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA). All published preclinical, animal, human extra-abdominal research as of July 2011 have been summarized and included in this document. Searches of Medline and EMBASE Drugs and Pharmaceuticals databases were conducted for original preclinical, animal, and human extra-abdominal studies involving Seprafilm. Preclinical, animal, and extra-abdominal human investigational studies are the study selection for this manuscript. Intraabdominal use is discussed in the accompanying manuscript. Data extraction includes systematic manuscript review. Summary of preclinical, animal, and extra-abdominal human investigational use of Seprafilm by surgical discipline were gathered for data synthesis. The clinical use of Seprafilm, which was approved by the FDA for intra-abdominal procedures, is supported by preclinical and animal studies relating to general surgical and obstetrical/gynecological applications. Findings from preclinical, animal, and human investigational studies at other sites throughout the body raises the potential for additional human clinical trials to assess efficacy and safety following surgical procedures at non-abdominal locations.

Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of Merogel coverage on ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) for primary chronic dacryocystitis (PCD).

METHODS

In all, 260 patients with unilateral PCD were randomized into two groups: the Merogel group and the control group. All patients underwent EES-DCR. The Merogel group received Merogel covering the wound 1-2 mm around the ostium and the control group received no treatment. Patients were followed up for 9 months. The mucosal epithelialization of the wound, the proliferation of fibrosis tissue, and the success rate of ostial patency were compared.

RESULTS

Our study included 112 patients in the Merogel group and 115 patients in the control group. At the 2-week review, intact mucosal epithelium lined the ostia in 96 Merogel patients compared with 80 control patients (ITT analysis: χ(2)=4.502, P=0.034). At the 9-month review, scars were present in 18 patients in the Merogel group compared with 39 patients in the control group (ITT analysis: χ(2)=9.909, P=0.002, ITT analysis). No differences were observed in the granulation formation between the two groups. The success rate of ostial patency reached 94.6% (106/112) in the Merogel group compared with 80% (92/115) in the control group (ITT analysis: χ(2)=4.151, P=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Merogel coverage may enhance the success rate of EES-DCR for PCD by promoting mucosal epithelial healing and preventing excessive scarring.