Exploring reasons for late identification of children with early-onset hearing loss

Risk Factors Associated with Delays in Hearing Loss Identification in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify sociodemographic factors associated with pediatric late-identified hearing loss (LIHL) and classify novel subgroups within the LIHL population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary children's hospital.

METHODS

Our cohort included children with permanent hearing loss (HL) between 2012 and 2020 (n = 1087). Patients with early-identified HL were compared to patients with LIHL (>6 months of age at diagnosis), and 3 subgroups: (1) late-identified congenital HL: failed NHS but had a diagnostic audiogram >6 months old; (2) late-onset HL: passed NHS and identified with HL after 6 months old; (3) late-identified, unknown-onset: unknown NHS results, identified after 6 months old. Geospatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS Pro.

RESULTS

Compared with early-identified children, children with LIHL were more likely to have more comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, [1.01, 1.23]), be an under-represented minority (URM) (OR = 1.92, [1.27, 2.93]) and have a higher social vulnerability index (SVI) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.1, [1.14, 3.87]). However, subgroups in the LIHL cohort had variable associations. Children with late-identified unknown onset hearing loss were uniquely associated with a primarily non-English speaking household (AOR = 1.84, [1.04, 3.25]), whereas children with late-onset hearing loss were less likely to have public insurance (AOR = 0.47, [0.27, 0.81]. There were no significant associations for children with late-identified congenital hearing loss. Neighborhood disadvantage, as measured by SVI, had an increased association with late-identified unknown onset HL (AOR = 4.08, [2.01, 8.28]) and a decreased association with late-onset HL (AOR = 0.40, [0.22, 0.72]).

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic factors serve as proxies for health care access, and these factors vary across LIHL pathways. Understanding the risk factors associated with each LIHL subgroup may help address disparities in pediatric HL identification.

Hearing Outcomes in Failed Newborn Hearing Screening Infants With and Without Chronic Serous Otitis

OBJECTIVE

To identify outcomes in hearing loss (HL) diagnosis and intervention in infants with a failed newborn hearing screen (NBHS) and otitis media with effusion (OME) compared to those with failed NBHS and without OME.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

METHODS

A chart review was performed on infants referred to Primary Children's Hospital for failed NBHS from 2012 to 2018. Eighty infants with failed NBHS and OME and 55 with failed NBHS and no OME were included. Incidence of permanent HL along with the age of HL confirmation and early intervention (EI) enrollment were compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of OME in infants with failed NBHS was 59.3%. Fifty-six percent of infants with OME and 12.5% of those without OME did not receive definitive hearing confirmation in either ear due to loss to follow-up or insufficient audiometric assessment. Permanent HL was identified in 11.3% (n = 9) of infants with OME and in 20.0% (n = 11) of those without OME. Infants with OME were significantly older at the time of HL confirmation (4.2 ± 2.1 months) and EI enrollment (5.4 ± 2.5 months) compared to those without OME at the time of HL confirmation (1.0 ± 1.0 months; p < .001) and EI enrollment (2.6 ± 1.8 months; p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Infants with failed NBHS and OME are highly susceptible to a significant delay in HL confirmation or lack of confirmatory hearing tests. Timely OME resolution with earlier ventilation tube insertion by 3 months of age and follow-up audiologic assessment is recommended.

Do all infants with congenital hearing loss meet the 1-3-6 criteria? A study of a 10-year cohort from a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 1) the outcomes of a local universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programme and its audiological follow-ups at 3- and 6-month points, 2) the education outcomes of children with congenital hearing loss (CHL).

DESIGN

Retrospective study that analysed data containing hearing screening, diagnosis, intervention and schooling information from electronic databases.

STUDY SAMPLE

Children aged 5 to 15 years old who were born between 2004-2014 and underwent UNHS in a local hospital.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year cohort, 99.4% of 29,972 newborns underwent UNHS; approximately 90% of them were screened by 1 month of age. However, only 10% of the cohort strictly fulfilled the 1-3-6 criteria recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Lost to follow-up (LTF) rate was highest at post-diagnosis (35%). 80% of infants who were intervened between 6 and 48 months of age went to mainstream schools. The remaining 20% had additional disabilities or family factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A high UNHS coverage rate may not translate to meeting the 1-3-6 criteria. Despite ease of access to our healthcare system, LTF at post-diagnosis remained high. In the absence of additional disabilities or family factors, infants intervened during the sensitive window could still potentially make it into mainstream schools.

Prevalence and Profiles of Late-Onset Hearing Loss in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Passed Newborn Hearing Screening in a South East Asian Population

Prevalence of hearing loss in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is uncertain, as it is more challenging to assess hearing function in children with developmental difficulties (DD). We aimed to determine the prevalence and profiles of hearing loss in preschool children with ASD in a Southeast-Asian population who passed newborn hearing screening. A retrospective study of preschool children with DD (ASD, Global Developmental Delay (GDD), and Speech and Language Delay (SLD)) attending the Child Development Unit (CDU) at our hospital was performed. Three hundred and thirty-three children (ASD: n = 129; GDD: n = 110; and SLD: n = 94) underwent hearing assessments. Of these, 10.8% of children (n = 36, comprising 15 with ASD, 12 with GDD and 9 with SLD) had confirmed hearing loss. Hearing loss was predominantly bilateral in children with ASD and GDD; in those with SLD, unilateral and bilateral hearing loss were equally common. Conductive hearing loss occurred as frequently as sensorineural hearing loss in children with ASD and SLD, but was the dominant subtype in those with GDD. Moderate to severe hearing loss (n = 2) was noted only in children with ASD. Children with ASD and GDD required significantly more audiology visits and procedures to obtain conclusive hearing test results, compared to those with SLD. The need to identify hearing loss and monitor for resolution is particularly important in vulnerable populations with communication deficits, such as in those with ASD.

Cochlear implants: the effects of age on outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide access to sound for children and adults who do not receive adequate benefit from hearing aids. Age at implantation is known to affect outcomes across the lifespan.

AREAS COVERED

The effects of age on CI outcomes are examined for infants, children, adolescents, and older adults. A variety of outcome measures are considered, including speech perception, language, cognition, and quality of life measures.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

For those meeting candidacy criteria, CIs are beneficial at any age. In general, younger age is related to greater benefit when considering pre-lingual deafness. Other factors such as additional disabilities, may mitigate this effect. Post-lingually deafened adults demonstrate similar benefit regardless of age, though the oldest individuals (80+) may see smaller degrees of improvement from preoperative scores. Benefit can be measured in many ways, and the areas of greatest benefit may vary based on age: young children appear to see the greatest effects of age at implantation on language measures, whereas scores on cognitive measures appear to be most impacted for the oldest population. Future research should consider implantation at extreme ages (5-9 months or > 90 years), unconventional measures of CI benefit including qualitative assessments, and longitudinal designs.

"I think it impacts all areas of his life": Perspectives on hearing from mothers of individuals with Down syndrome

BACKGROUND

Individuals with Down syndrome are known to have high rates of hearing loss, but it is unclear how this impacts their ability to communicate and function in real-world environments.

METHODS

Sixteen English-speaking and Spanish-speaking mothers of individuals with Down syndrome ages 6-40 years participated in individual, semi-structured interviews using a videoconferencing platform. Session transcripts were analysed using applied thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Mothers described listening environments, the impact of hearing on daily life, barriers to successful listening, and strategies to overcome communication barriers for their children with Down syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing was largely discussed in terms of challenges and detriments, suggesting that hearing experiences are predominately considered to negatively impact the functional abilities of individuals with Down syndrome. Background noise and hearing loss were sources of communication difficulties. Parent-reported barriers and strategies can inform ecologically valid research priorities aimed at improving outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome.

Barriers to and Facilitators of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) is guided by the 1-3-6 approach: screening by one month, diagnosis by 3 mo, and early intervention (EI) enrollment by 6 mo. Although screening rates remain high, successful diagnosis and EI-enrollment lag in comparison. The aim of this systematic review is to critically examine and synthesize the barriers to and facilitators of EHDI that exist for families, as they navigate the journey of congenital hearing loss diagnosis and management in the United States. Understanding barriers across each and all stages is necessary for EHDI stakeholders to develop and test novel approaches which will effectively reduce barriers to early hearing healthcare.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search was completed in May and August 2021 for empirical articles focusing on screening, diagnosis, and EI of children with hearing loss. Two independent reviewers completed title and abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessments with a third independent reviewer establishing consensus at each stage. Data synthesis was completed using the Framework Analysis approach to categorize articles into EHDI journey timepoints and individual/family-level factors versus system-level factors.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Results revealed that both individual/family-level (e.g., economic stability, medical status of the infant including middle ear involvement) and system-level barriers (e.g., system-service capacity, provider knowledge, and program quality) hinder timely diagnosis and EI for congenital hearing loss. Specific social determinants of health were noted as barriers to effective EHDI; however, system-level facilitators such as care coordination, colocation of services, and family support programs have been shown to mitigate the negative impact of those sociodemographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Many barriers exist for families to obtain appropriate and timely EHDI for their children, but system-level changes could facilitate the process and contribute to long-term outcomes improvement. Limitations of this study include limited generalizability due to the heterogeneity of EHDI programs and an inability to ascertain factor interactions.

Results and patient satisfaction from an early access infant hearing detection clinic

INTRODUCTION

National recommendations in the United States specify that all infants with hearing impairment should be identified by 3 months of age. Infants who fail universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) require follow up testing after hospital discharge. Follow up testing may be difficult to obtain in some communities within the ideal time frame. A rapid access multidisciplinary clinic was established for failed UNHS. The objective of this study is to report outcomes and patient satisfaction from an early access hearing detection clinic.

METHODS

Infants that failed UNHS were seen in the multidisciplinary clinic between 1/1/19 and 2/28/22. Patients underwent automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing and consulted with an otolaryngology nurse practitioner. Failed results were followed by diagnostic ABR. Surveys were administered at the beginning and end of the appointment.

RESULTS

In total, 169 infants were seen at a mean age of 8.4 weeks (95%CI 7.5, 9.4). Repeat testing was abnormal in 38 (22.4%). Diagnostic ABR was performed at an average age of 13.7 weeks (n = 34, 95% CI: 10.8, 16.6) and led to a diagnosis of hearing loss in 18 infants. Twenty-seven parents completed surveys at the initial visit. Anxiety level among patients with normal repeat testing (n = 20) decreased from 1.9 to 1.2 (p = .002), while anxiety level among those with abnormal repeat testing (n = 7) was not statistically different before and after (2.1 vs 2.7, p = .2). Satisfaction level was 3.7 ± 0.7 (scored 1-4). All parents reported having a better understanding of their child's hearing problem after the visit.

DISCUSSION

This novel nurse practitioner-led early hearing detection clinic enabled timely diagnosis of hearing loss and reassurance to families without hearing loss. Age at hearing loss diagnosis compares favorably to published cohorts.

Postnatal hearing loss: a study of children who passed neonatal TEOAE hearing screening bilaterally

BACKGROUND

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) contributes to the early diagnosis of hearing loss. However, not all permanent pediatric hearing impairments can be identified by UNHS.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE

To investigate children who have successfully passed the UNHS, but have later-onset hearing loss at an early stage.

METHODS

UNHS of children, was reviewed retrospectively from databases at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Gender, age, the reason for contact, the first contact and the most recent audiogram, the hearing diagnosis, the degree of hearing loss when they were enrolled in hearing rehabilitation, and the hearing aids they used were analysed.

RESULTS

63 children who had passed the UNHS at birth and were diagnosed with a hearing impairment at a later stage were included in the study. The average age was 3.3 and 3.9 years old when the children were diagnosed and were finally enrolled in the hearing habilitation, respectively. The reasons for diagnostic evaluation of a suspected hearing loss at present study are preschool hearing tests at the Child Health Care Centres, parents suspect, and/or delayed speech and language development.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings suggest that a passed UNHS does not exclude a future delayed onset of hearing loss, particularly in children with risk factors.

Detecting Hearing Loss in Infants With a Syndrome or Craniofacial Abnormalities Following the Newborn Hearing Screen

Purpose The current Joint Committee on Infant Hearing guidelines recommend that infants with syndromes or craniofacial abnormalities (CFAs) who pass the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) undergo audiological assessment by 9 months of age. However, emerging research suggests that children with these risk factors are at increased risk of early hearing loss despite passing UNHS. To establish whether earlier diagnostic audiological assessment is warranted for all infants with a syndrome or CFA, regardless of screening outcome, this study compared audiological outcomes of those who passed UNHS and those who referred. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on infants with a syndrome or CFA born between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2017 who participated in Queensland, Australia's state-wide UNHS program. Results Permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) yield was higher among infants who referred on newborn hearing screening (51.20%) than in those who passed. Nonetheless, 27.47% of infants who passed were subsequently diagnosed with hearing loss (4.45% PCHL, 23.02% transient conductive), but PCHL was generally milder in this cohort. After microtia/atresia, the most common PCHL etiologies were Trisomy 21, other syndromes, and cleft palate. Of the other syndromes, Pierre Robin sequence featured prominently among infants who passed the hearing screen and were subsequently diagnosed with PCHL, whereas there was a broader mix of other syndromes that caused PCHL in infants who referred on screening. Conclusion Children identified with a syndrome or CFA benefit from early diagnostic audiological assessment, regardless of their newborn hearing screening outcome.

[Follow-up II of newborn hearing screening : Evaluation of a follow-up II facility after implementation of newborn hearing screening in Germany]

BACKGROUND

With the implementation of newborn hearing screening, evaluation in terms of quality and goal achievement was required. The present study evaluates a follow-up II facility from 2009 to 2016.

METHODS

Data of 2705 newborns were retrospectively evaluated. The annual number of patients was analyzed, as well as the median age at first presentation, at diagnosis, and at treatment, each according to the reason for presentation and the diagnosis.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2016, the number of presented newborns increased by 91.4%. Newborns with abnormal initial screening or risk factors were presented significantly later than those for initial screening (median 5.3 and 8.0 vs. 4.6 weeks, respectively; p < 0.001). Permanently or transiently hearing-impaired patients were presented and diagnosed significantly later than those with normal hearing (age at initial presentation 6.1 and 7.6 vs. 5.4 weeks, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively; age at diagnosis 11.4 and 23.1 vs. 5.9 weeks, respectively; p < 0.001). Permanent hearing loss was treated at the age of 14.1 weeks. From 2009 to 2014, the age at first presentation and at diagnosis increased and subsequently mostly decreased until 2016.

CONCLUSION

The age at first presentation and at diagnosis depends on the reason for presentation and on the diagnosis. Despite increasing patient numbers, the Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, G‑BA) targets were met due to effective and efficient organizational structuring of the follow-up II facility. However, early admission to a follow-up II facility is a prerequisite for the success of newborn hearing screening.

Better late than never? Maternal biopsychosocial predictors of late follow-up from new Jersey's early hearing detection and intervention program

OBJECTIVES

Early hearing detection and intervention programs are designed to mitigate consequences of hearing loss in infants. Most research examining compliance with program protocols has examined factors related to being lost to follow-up. Another group that warrants study are babies who return for follow-up outside the timelines recommended by public health organizations. This research seeks to identify maternal factors that are associated with late follow-up at the point of diagnosis of hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

The sampling frame for this study included all babies born in New Jersey in a two-year period. Our final sample consisted of 716 babies who needed diagnostic evaluations and completed them. Five hundred twenty-six babies completed their exams on-time while 190 completed them late. Logistic regression was completed to identify maternal factors related to late follow-up, and additional statistics were utilized to understand characteristics of babies who were late.

RESULTS

In the final modeling, maternal education (OR = 0.52), WIC participation (OR = 2.11), and health insurance status (OR = 2.04) were significantly predictive of being late (X² (6) = 77.71; p < 0.01). Mothers for whom postpartum depression (OR = 1.89) was a concern were more also likely to have babies who were late. Needing to repeat a diagnostic audiologic exam was most predictive of lateness (OR = 5.32). Over one-third of babies who had confirmed hearing loss completed their testing late.

CONCLUSIONS

Late completion of diagnostic hearing tests may contribute to delays in children hitting developmental milestones in a timely manner. Low socioeconomic status mothers and those with postpartum depression may have difficulty following up with recommended hearing tests. Limitations include data quality issues inherent in using administrative data.

Alteration of Cortical and Subcortical Structures in Children With Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is an auditory disability associated with auditory and cognitive dysfunction. Due to distinct pathogenesis, some associated structural and functional changes within the brain have been investigated in previous studies, but whole-brain structural alterations are incompletely understood. We extended the exploration of neuroanatomic differences in whole-brain structure in children with profound SNHL who are primarily users of Chinese sign language (CSL). We employed surface-based morphometry (SBM) and subcortical analyses. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of 26 children with profound SNHL and 27 age- and sex-matched children with normal hearing were analyzed. Compared with the normal control (NC) group, children with profound SNHL showed diverse structural changes in surface-based and subcortical analyses, including decreased cortical thickness in the left postcentral gyrus, superior parietal lobule, paracentral lobule, precuneus, the right transverse temporal gyri, and the middle temporal gyrus; a noticeable increase in the Local Gyrification Index (LGI) in the left precuneus and superior parietal lobule; and diverse changes in gray-matter volume (GMV) in different brain regions. Surface-based vertex analyses revealed regional contractions in the right thalamus, putamen, pallidum, and the brainstem of children with profound SNHL when compared with those in the NC group. Volumetric analyses showed decreased volumes of the right thalamus and pallidum in children with profound SNHL. Our data suggest that children with profound SNHL are associated with diffuse cerebral dysfunction to cortical and subcortical nuclei, and revealed neuroplastic reorganization in the precuneus, superior parietal lobule, and temporal gyrus. Our study provides robust evidence for changes in connectivity and structure in the brain associated with hearing loss.

Prevalence and risk factors for delayed-onset hearing loss in early childhood: A population-based observational study in Okayama Prefecture, Japan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to retrospectively document prevalence rates of delayed-onset hearing loss (DOHL) under 7 years old after passing the newborn hearing screening (NHS) program using its database in Okayama Prefecture, as well as records from Okayama Kanariya Gakuen (OKG, Auditory Center for Hearing Impaired Children, Okayama Prefecture, Japan). We explored the percentage of children with DOHL among all children who underwent the NHS and surveyed risk factors abstracted from their clinical records.

METHODS

We collected data of 1171 children, who first visited OKG from April 2006 to March 2018. DOHL children were defined as bilaterally hearing-impaired children who were diagnosed under 7 years old after passing the NHS at birth. Based on the medical records, we investigated age at diagnosis, hearing levels, and risk factors. As population-based data of 168,104 children, the percentage of DOHL subjects was retrospectively calculated among the total number of children who underwent the NHS in Okayama Prefecture from April 2005 to March 2017.

RESULTS

During the period, we identified 96 children with bilateral DOHL, of which 34 children had failed the NHS unilaterally and 62 had passed the NHS bilaterally. Among all children who underwent the NHS in Okayama Prefecture, the prevalence rate of DOHL in unilaterally referred infants was 5.2%, and 0.037% in bilaterally passed children. The prevalence of bilateral DOHL was 0.057% overall. Unilaterally referred children with DOHL were diagnosed at an average of 13.9 months, while bilaterally passed children with DOHL were diagnosed at an average of 42.3 months. Approximately 59.4% of children with DOHL had risk factors, among which family history of hearing loss was the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

We propose the first English report of DOHL prevalence in the prefecture population in Japann, which is among the largest community-based population ever reported. The NHS is not a perfect strategy to detect all early-childhood hearing loss; therefore, careful assessment of hearing throughout childhood is recommended, especially in children with risk factors of hearing loss. Further interventional strategies must be established, such as regular hearing screening in high-risk children and assessments of hearing and speech/language development in public communities and nursery schools.

Adherence to follow-up recommendations for babies at risk for pediatric hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the families' compliance with recommendations for continued monitoring of babies with high-risk factors for hearing loss.

METHODS

Hearing screening and follow-up results from 604 babies were tracked across a five-year period. Bivariate analysis, including chi-square analysis, t-tests, and one-way analyses of variance were conducted to test whether various factors predicted likelihood of follow up.

RESULTS

Although 86% of the babies returned for the initial follow-up appointment, few completed the protocol or were diagnosed with hearing loss (10.3%). Excluding the babies who never returned, the average age for initial assessment was near the recommended 3-month target (3.5 months). However, babies were last seen at 9.4 months on average, which is earlier than recommended. Some factors positively predicted follow-up: receipt of ototoxic medication, hyperbilirubinemia requiring transfusion, ECMO, syndromes associated with hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies, and passing the newborn hearing screening. Others were negatively predictive: NICU stay >5 days, younger maternal age, and failing the newborn screening. There was no relationship between the results of the last test and whether the families continued with monitoring. Babies with risks categorized as more likely to be associated with delayed onset hearing loss were more often late to the initial follow up, but also followed up for a longer period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the need to focus on the barriers unique to babies with risk factors for late onset/progressive hearing loss in addition to those barriers that generally affect loss to follow up. Tools for parental engagement are recommended.

Comprehensive hearing care network for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss: 8 years' experience in Miyazaki

OBJECTIVE

In 2010, we established the Miyazaki Comprehensive Hearing Care Network (MCHCN) for early identification and intervention in children with congenital and late-onset/acquired hearing loss with the cooperation of related administrative bodies in Miyazaki prefecture. The central roles of the MCHCN program are played by the Hearing Care Center (HCC) at the University of Miyazaki Hospital established in 2010 to facilitate audiological diagnoses, hearing aid interventions, and educational efforts, as well as linkage with the Department of Otolaryngology for surgical interventions. Herein, we aimed to present the main outcomes of the MCHCN program organized by the HCC at the University of Miyazaki Hospital.

METHODS

The MCHCN consists of two different networks, the Newborn Hearing Screening Network (NHSN) and the Pediatric Hearing Care Network (PHCN). All children suspected of having hearing loss by Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) are referred to the HCC via the NHSN. In addition, children suspected of late-onset/acquired hearing loss by municipality-led health checkups, pediatricians, public health nurses, and childcare workers are referred to the HCC via the PHCN. Children who were born in Miyazaki prefecture between January 2010 and December 2017 and referred to the HCC for detailed hearing examination were included in this study.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 89,390 infants were born in Miyazaki prefecture, and 84,737 (94.9%) of them underwent NHS. A total of 698 infants and 182 children with suspected hearing loss were referred to the HCC via the NHSN and PHCN, respectively. Of the 880 referrals, 169 were diagnosed with hearing loss, which included 80 children with bilateral hearing loss and 89 children with unilateral hearing loss. Of the 80 children with bilateral hearing loss, 76 began wearing hearing aids and 15 had cochlear implants in the follow-up period. In children with bilateral conductive hearing loss, 4 children with bilateral middle ear anomalies underwent ossiculoplasty, following which two of these children no longer required hearing aids. Imaging assessments performed on 71 of the 89 children with unilateral hearing loss revealed that 20 of the 30 (66%) children who underwent CT exhibited ossicular anomalies and 28 out of the 48 (58%) children who underwent MRI were found to have ipsilateral cochlear nerve hypoplasia. Among the 169 children with hearing loss, no follow-up loss was observed during the period of this study.

CONCLUSION

The MCHCN that was organized at the initiative of the HCC at the University of Miyazaki Hospital has enabled the provision of comprehensive and continuous support, ranging from diagnosis to intervention, not only for children with suspected hearing loss referred based on their NHS results but also for those who pass the screening. Via this system, children with late-onset/acquired hearing loss can be identified early and can receive medical interventions tailored to the cause of their hearing loss while simultaneously avoiding a loss to follow-up.

Progressive Hearing Loss in Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss

Purpose This study investigated progressive hearing loss in a cohort of children who were identified with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss. Method This population-based study included 207 children with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss, diagnosed and followed from 2003 to 2016 in 1 region of Canada. Clinical characteristics and initial audiologic results were collected prospectively at diagnosis, and audiologic information was updated. Changes in hearing levels between the 1st and most recent assessment were analyzed to determine progressive hearing loss. Clinical characteristics were compared between children with progressive and stable hearing loss. The association between risk indicators and progressive hearing loss was explored through logistic regression. Results A total of 47.4% (94 of 207) had progressive hearing loss in at least 1 ear, and 50% (47 of 94) of those experienced more than 20-dB average drop in thresholds. For these 94 children, a total of 147 ears were affected, and 116 (78.9%) ears experienced sufficient change in thresholds to be coded as a worse category of hearing loss. In the subset of 85 children with more than 5 years of audiologic follow-up, 56.4% (53/85) showed a decrease in hearing. Of the total sample of 207 children, 137 (66.2%) continued to have mild hearing loss in the better ear. There was no association between the risk factors examined (family history of hearing loss, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, or presence of a syndrome) and progressive hearing loss. Conclusion This study found that almost half of children with mild bilateral hearing loss showed a decrease in hearing in at least 1 ear. One third of the children first diagnosed with mild hearing loss in the better ear now have moderate or worse hearing loss in both ears. These findings point to the importance of careful long-term monitoring of children who present with mild hearing loss.

The left lateral occipital cortex exhibits decreased thickness in children with sensorineural hearing loss

Patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) tend to show language delay, executive functioning deficits, and visual cognitive impairment, even after intervention with hearing amplification and cochlear implants, which suggest altered brain structures and functions in SNHL patients. In this study, we investigated structural brain MRI in 30 children with SNHL (18 mild to moderate [M-M] SNHL and 12 moderately severe to profound [M-P] SNHL) by comparing gender- and age-matched normal controls (NC). Region-based analyses did not show statistically significant differences in volumes of the cerebrum, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and the ventricles between SNHL and NC. On surface-based analyses, the global and lobar cortical surface area, thickness, and volumes were not statistically significantly different between SNHL and NC participants. Regional surface areas, cortical thicknesses, and cortical volumes were statistically significantly smaller in M-P SNHL compared to NC in the left middle occipital cortex, and left inferior occipital cortex after a correction for multiple comparisons using random field theory (p < 0.02). These regions were identified as areas known to be related to high level visual cognition including the human middle temporal area, lateral occipital area, occipital face area, and V8. The observed regional decreased thickness in M-P SNHL may be associated with dysfunctions of visual cognition in SNHL detectable in a clinical setting.

Profound Hearing Loss: Addressing Barriers to Hearing Healthcare

The impact of profound hearing loss on infants and adults is variable and greatly influenced by improved audition derived from hearing aids and cochlear implants. However, barriers to healthcare, hearing healthcare in particular, can offset the benefits provided by these sensory devices. Common barriers include cost, location, availability of trained professionals, acceptance of the hearing loss, language and cultural differences, secondary disabilities, and mental health issues. These barriers and their distinct presentations vary somewhat by age, language, and where people live (urban vs. rural), and can interfere with receiving testing and devices in a timely manner. They also can limit auditory, speech and language therapies, and interfere with acceptance of the hearing loss and devices. Rehabilitation should focus on eliminating or reducing the adverse impact of these barriers on patients and their families. Some of which can be done through professional training and multidisciplinary activities, counseling, and community outreach.