Hearing loss in pediatric temporal bone fractures: Evaluating two radiographic classification systems as prognosticators

Factors Associated With Loss to Follow Up After Temporal Bone Fracture

INTRODUCTION

Inpatient and outpatient evaluation is important for management of temporal bone trauma due to the possible otologic complications that can result. However, there is limited literature on follow up rates following temporal bone fracture. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients lost to follow up after sustaining temporal bone fractures and identify factors associated with loss to follow up.

METHODS

Retrospective review of adult patients who sustained temporal bone fractures at a level I trauma center from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2024 was completed (IRB H-44161). The primary outcome included prevalence of patient loss to follow up. Secondary variables included initial radiographic and exam findings, otologic complications, and demographic characteristics. Patients who were seen in follow up and lost to follow up were compared, and odds of loss to follow up was calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria for this study, of which 30 patients (43.5%) were lost to follow up. Patients who were White had a significantly lower odds of loss to follow up than those who were not White (OR = 0.2506 (95% CI: 0.0706, 0.8067, P = .0024). While need for acute management was not significantly different between the groups, a significantly lower proportion of patients who were intubated on presentation (P = .0091), had abnormal otoscopic exam (P = .0211), and had otologic complications (P = .0056) were lost to follow up.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patients who sustained temporal bone fractures, including a significantly higher odds of minority race/ethnicity patients, were lost to follow up.

Complications After Pediatric Temporal Bone Fractures by Classification System: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the rates of complications after pediatric temporal bone fractures (TBF) and the utility of the longitudinal, transverse, and mixed versus the otic capsule sparing (OCS) and otic capsule violating (OCV) classification systems in predicting these complications.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Per PRISMA guidelines, studies of children with TBFs were included. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies with 1376 TBFs were included. Children with TBF had higher rates of conductive hearing loss (CHL) than sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (31.3% [95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2-40.1] vs 12.9% [95% CI 8.9-17.5]). No differences in both CHL and SNHL were seen between longitudinal and transverse TBFs; however, OCV TBFs had higher rates of SNHL than OCS TBFs (59.3% [95% CI 27.8-87.0] vs 4.9% [95% CI 1.5-10.1]). Of all patients, 9.9% [95% CI 7.2-13.1] experienced facial nerve (FN) paresis/paralysis, and 13.4% [95% CI 5.9-23.2] experienced cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Transverse TBFs had higher rates of FN paresis/paralysis than longitudinal (27.7% [95% CI 17.4-40.0] vs 8.6% [95% CI 5.2-12.8]), but rates were similar between OCS and OCV TBFs.

CONCLUSION

CHL was the most common complication after TBF in children; however, neither classification system was superior in identifying CHL. The traditional system was more effective at identifying FN injuries, and the new system was more robust at identifying SNHL. While these results suggest that both classification systems might have utility in evaluating pediatric TBFs, these analyses were limited by sample size. Future research on outcomes of pediatric TBFs stratified by type of fracture, mainly focusing on long-term outcomes, is needed.

Non-Syndromic Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children

Pediatric hearing loss is common with significant consequences in terms of language, communication, social and emotional development, and academic advancement. Radiological imaging provides useful information regarding hearing loss etiology, prognosis, therapeutic options, and potential surgical pitfalls. This review provides an overview of temporal bone imaging protocols, an outline of the classification of inner ear anomalies associated with sensorineural hearing loss and illustrates some of the more frequently encountered and/or important causes of non-syndromic hearing loss.

Evaluation and Outcomes of Hearing Loss in Temporal Bone Fractures: A Prospective Study

Background Fractures of the skull base occur in 3-30% of head injury presentations to the emergency department. Overall, 9-40% of the cases have temporal bone fractures (TBFs). This fracture may disrupt the intervening structures causing edema, hematoma, bleeding, hearing loss, dizziness, cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea, and facial nerve paralysis. This study aims to evaluate the type of TBF, its correlation with hearing loss, and the outcomes of hearing loss. Methodology A prospective observational study was done among 50 patients who presented to the emergency department following trauma with clinical features and CT of the temporal bone suggestive of TBF. A complete evaluation of the patients was done, and patients were managed as per the departmental protocol. The patients were followed up for six months and monitored for otological symptoms. Periodic assessment of hearing loss by pure tone audiometry (PTA) was performed at the end of one week, one month, and six months. Results The most common type of fracture in our study was longitudinal TBF (72%), followed by transverse TBF (20%) and mixed TBF (8%). According to the newer classification, otic capsule-sparing fracture was more common than otic capsule-violating fracture. Most patients presented with conductive hearing loss (60%) following the TBF. On follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in hearing loss at the end of six months. Conclusions Our study found that in most cases hearing loss improved over time. Patients with conductive hearing loss showed maximum improvement in comparison to patients with sensorineural and mixed hearing loss.

Improved Prediction of Hearing Loss after Temporal Bone Fracture by Applying a Detailed Classification for Otic Capsule-Violating Fracture: A Wide Scope Analysis with Large Case Series

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze the predictability of temporal bone (TB) fracture-associated hearing loss by applying a detailed classification separating individual injury of the cochlea, vestibule, and semicircular canals (SCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with otic capsule-violating (OCV) fractures were further classified as OCV-C(VS) when the cochlea was involved regardless of vestibule or SCC involvement, OCV-V(S) when the vestibule was involved regardless of SCC involvement, and OCV-S when the fracture only involved SCC. Hearing changes were compared by applying the above-mentioned classification, and TB fracture-induced facial palsy was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were included. Patients with OCV fractures had significantly worse bone conduction (BC) and air conduction (AC) thresholds (59.1 ± 25.3 and 87.0 ± 29.5 dB) than those with otic capsule-sparing (OCS) fractures (20.1 ± 17.9 and 36.5 ± 21.9 dB; p < 0.001 for each comparison). The BC and the AC thresholds of OCV-C(VS) (77.5 ± 11.0 and 114.2 ± 14.3 dB) and OCV-V(S) (69.3 ± 27.7 and 98.0 ± 22.2 dB) were significantly higher than OCV-S (40.1 ± 22.9 and 62.1 ± 25.6 dB; p < 0.001 for each comparison). The BC hearing thresholds were not significantly improved in the last pure tone audiometry when compared for total, OCV, or OCS cases. The AC threshold significantly improved in OCS cases. In a considerable number of cases with facial palsy, causative fracture lines involved the geniculate ganglion or tympanic segment without the involvement of the otic capsule. Most cases showed significant improvement; however, recovery was limited in cases with obvious fallopian canal disruption.

CONCLUSIONS

The cases with sole involvement of SCC had significantly better hearing thresholds than those with cochlear or vestibule involvement, even in OCV fracture cases.

Pediatric basilar skull fractures from multi-level falls: A systematic review and retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multi-level fall (MLF) accounts for 26.5%-37.7% of traumatic pediatric basilar skull fractures (BSFs). There is a dearth of information concerning recommendations for work-up, diagnosis, treatment, and otolaryngological follow-up of pediatric basilar skull fractures secondary to MLFs. Through a systematic literature review and retrospective review of an institution's trauma experience, we sought to identify clinical findings among pediatric MLF patients that indicate the need for otolaryngological follow-up.

METHODS

A two-researcher team following the PRISMA guidelines performed a systematic literature review. PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were searched August 16th^, 2020 and again on November 20th^, 2021 for English language articles published after 1980 using search terms Pediatric AND (fall OR "multi level fall" OR "fall from height") AND ("basilar fracture" OR "basilar skull fracture" OR "skull base fracture" OR "skull fracture"). Simultaneously, an institutional trauma database and retrospective chart review was performed for all patients under age 18 who presented with a MLF to a pediatric tertiary care center between 2007 and 2018.

RESULTS

168 publications were identified and 13 articles reporting pediatric basilar skull fracture data and MLF as a mechanism of injury were selected for review. MLF is the most common etiology of BSF, accounting for 26.5-37.7% of pediatric BSFs. In the retrospective review, there were 180 cases of BSF from MLF in the study period (4.2%). BSF and fall height were significantly associated (p < 0.001), as well as presence of a CSF leak and fall height (p = 0.02), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (p = 0.047), and BSF fracture type (p < 0.001). However, when stratified by age, these associations were only present in the younger group. Of those with non-temporal bone BSFs (n = 71), children with hemotympanum (n = 7) were approximately 18 times more likely (RR 18.3, 95% CI 1.89 to 177.02) than children without hemotympanum (n = 64) to have hearing loss at presentation (28.6% vs. 1.6% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

MLF is the most common cause of pediatric basilar skull fractures. However, there is limited information on the appropriate work-up or otolaryngologic follow-up for this mechanism of injury. Our retrospective review suggests fall height is predictive for BSF, ICH, and CSF leak in younger children. Also, children with non-temporal bone BSFs and hemotympanum may represent a significant population requiring otolaryngology follow-up.

Association of Pediatric Hearing Loss and Head Injury in a Population-Based Study

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of acquired long-term disability during childhood, and it may result in wide range of negative developmental consequences. Auditory dysfunction is generally recognized to be a possible sequela of pediatric TBI. Unfortunately, few contemporary studies have quantified the association between head injury and hearing loss in the pediatric population. The National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) for the combined years 2017-2018 was used to determine the association of hearing loss with TBI. Deafness or problems with hearing were more commonly reported in children with a history or current brain injury/concussion compared to those without any such history (3.2% [70,000] and 1.2% [830,000] children, respectively; odds ratio, 2.67; P < .001). Findings suggest a notable association between TBI and hearing loss. Children with a history of TBI are 2.67 times more likely to have concurrent hearing complaints.Level of Evidence: IV.

Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Imaging in Children With Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Imaging used to determine the cause of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) in children is often justified by the high likelihood of detecting abnormalities, which implies that these abnormalities are associated with hearing loss and that imaging has a positive contribution to patient outcome or well-being by providing information on the prognosis, hereditary factors, or cause of hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with isolated unexplained USNHL and investigate the clinical relevance of these findings.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published from 1978 to 2017 on studies of children with USNHL who underwent CT and/or MRI of the temporal bone. Two authors (F.G.R. and E.N.B.P.) independently extracted information on population characteristics, imaging modality, and the prevalence of abnormalities and assessed the studies for risk of bias. Eligibility criteria included studies with 20 or more patients with USNHL who had CT and/or MRI scans, a population younger than 18 years, and those published in English.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The pooled prevalence with 95% CI of inner ear abnormalities grouped according to finding and imaging modality.

FINDINGS

Of 1562 studies, 18 were included with a total of 1504 participants included in the analysis. Fifteen studies were consecutive case studies and 3 were retrospective cohort studies. The pooled diagnostic yield for pathophysiologic relevant findings in patients with unexplained USNHL was 37% for CT (95% CI, 25%-48%) and 35% for MRI (95% CI, 22%-49%). Cochleovestibular abnormalities were found with a pooled frequency of 19% for CT (95% CI, 14%-25%) and 16% for MRI (95% CI, 7%-25%). Cochlear nerve deficiency and associated cochlear aperture stenosis had a pooled frequency of 16% for MRI (95% CI, 3%-29%) and 44% for CT (95% CI, 36%-53%), respectively. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) was detected with a pooled frequency of 7% for CT and 12% for MRI in children with USNHL.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Imaging provided insight into the cause of hearing loss in a pooled frequency of about 35% to 37% in children with isolated unexplained USNHL. However, none of these findings had therapeutic consequences, and imaging provided information on prognosis and hereditary factors only in a small proportion of children, namely those with EVA. Thus, there is currently no convincing evidence supporting a strong recommendation for imaging in children who present with USNHL. The advantages of imaging should be carefully balanced against the drawbacks during shared decision making.