Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Titanium Implant Obscuring Residual Cholesteatoma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Case Report

Cholesteatomas are benign growths of squamous epithelial tissue in the middle ear resulting in conductive hearing loss and/or erosion of the structures of the middle ear space. These lesions are surgically removed but require postoperative surveillance due to risk of recurrence or residual disease. Second-look surgery remains the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma; however, advanced imaging modalities such as non-echoplanar diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (non-EPI DWI-MRI) offer a less invasive alternative for surveillance. As surgeons become more reliant on advanced imaging, it is important to understand the limitations of the technology. We present a case of a delay in diagnosis of residual cholesteatoma due to a false-negative finding on non-EPI DWI-MRI screening in the presence of a titanium implant.

Performance of Non-EPI DW MRI for Pediatric Cholesteatoma Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of nonecho planar (non-EPI) diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect residual cholesteatoma in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary comprehensive hospital.

METHODS

Children operated on for a first-stage cholesteatoma procedure from 2010 to 2019 were included. MRIs were performed with non-EPI DW sequences. Initial reports were collected, indicating the presence or absence of hyperintensity suggestive of cholesteatoma. Three hundred twenty-three MRIs were correlated with the subsequent surgery (66%) or year-later MRI (21%), or were considered accurate if performed 5 years or more after the last surgery (13%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each imaging procedure for the detection of cholesteatoma were calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-four children with mean age of 9 ± 4 years old presented with cholesteatoma. MRIs were performed 27 ± 24 months after surgery. Residual cholesteatoma was diagnosed in 35%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI were 62%, 86%, 74%, and 78%, respectively. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity increased significantly over time (multivariate analysis). The mean delay after last surgery was of 30 ± 2.0 months for accurate MRI (true positive or negative) versus 17 ± 2.0 months for nonaccurate (false positive or negative) MRIs (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

However, long the delay after the last surgery, the sensitivity of non-EPI diffusion sequence MRI in children has limitations for the detection of residual cholesteatoma. Surveillance for residual cholesteatoma should incorporate findings at primary surgery, surgeon experience, a low threshold for second-look procedures, and routine imaging.

Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Residual Cholesteatoma in Children and Benefit of Radiological Rereview

OBJECTIVE

Non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (non-EPI MRI) is the appropriate sequence to detect residual cholesteatoma. In the child, MRI may be clinically useful to determine the timing of the second-look procedure. The aim of this paper was to retrospectively evaluate the performance of early MRI (before the 18th postoperative month) in detecting residual cholesteatoma in children after review by experienced specialized neuroradiologists.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

One university center comparative cohort.

METHODS

All patients who had a 2-staged procedure for cholesteatoma with an MRI before the second stage from 2010 to 2020 were included and analyzed. Three pediatric neuroradiologists reviewed all the images blinded to the surgical result.

RESULTS

N = 141 cholesteatoma events (140 children) were included with a mean age at MRI of 10 (±4) years old. Non-EPI MRIs were performed 10.7 (±3.8) months after the first-stage surgery and 2.2 (±2.6) months before the second-stage procedure. Non-EPI MRI had a 0.57 sensitivity (SE) and 0.83 specificity (SP). MRI was reviewed in 112 cases. The diagnosis was corrected in 17 cases (15.1%) (3 true positives, 7 false negatives, and 7 false positives). SE = 0.63 (p = 0.1) and SP = 0.92 (p = 0.08) after rereading.

CONCLUSION

Early MRI's SE is poor but SP is excellent after rereading. Evidence does not support the use of early non-EPI MRI to modify the surgical strategy or to postpone the second look. If performed, early non-EPI MRI should be read by specialized experienced radiologists with all 3 sequences (T1, T2, and non-EPI DW) and apparent diffusion coefficient calculation, especially in cases of otitis media with effusion.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of post-operative paediatric cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVES

High rates of recidivism are reported after paediatric cholesteatoma surgery. Our practice has adapted to include non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma. This audit aimed to evaluate the performance of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in our paediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans performed to detect residual disease or recurrence after surgery for cholesteatoma in children from 1 January 2012 to 30 November 2017 in our centre. Follow-up diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed to 16 August 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty-four diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were included. The sensitivity and specificity values of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting post-operative cholesteatoma were 81 per cent and 72 per cent, respectively. Positive predictive and negative predictive values were 72 per cent and 81 per cent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is recommended as a replacement for routine second-look surgical procedures in the paediatric population. However, we would caution that patients require close follow up after negative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging findings.

Mastoid Obliteration Decreases the Recurrent and Residual Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mastoid obliteration compared to the canal wall up (CWU) technique in cholesteatoma surgery based on the systematic review of the literature and the meta-analysis of the data.

METHODS

The systematic search was performed in four major databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL) on October 14, 2021. Studies comparing the CWU technique and mastoid obliteration were included. The exclusion criteria were less than 12 months follow-up, congenital cholesteatoma, indefinite description of the surgical method, and animal studies. The protocol was registered on Prospero (registration number: CRD42021282485). The risk of bias was evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool. Residual and recurrent disease proportions as primary outcomes, quality of life, ear discharge, infection rates, hearing results, and operation time as secondary outcomes were analyzed. In the quantitative synthesis, the random effect model was used, and heterogeneity was identified.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles with 2077 operations' data were found eligible. All the identified studies were retrospective cohorts. The odds of pooled residual and recurrent disease proportion were significantly lower in the obliteration group compared to CWU (OR = 0.45, CI:0.28;0.80, p = 0.014). However, when separated, the proportion of ears with recurrent (OR = 0.41, CI:0.11;1.57, p = 0.140) or residual (OR = 0.59, CI:0.23, 1.50, p = 0.207) disease did not show a significant difference, even though the odds were quite similar. The qualitative synthesis identified no significant difference in the secondary outcomes, but obliteration elongated the operation time.

CONCLUSION

Mastoid obliteration significantly decreased the proportion of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in pooled analyses compared to the CWU technique with low-quality of data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2022.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Clinical Potential and Applications

Since its discovery in the 1980s [...].

Usage Patterns of CT and MRI in the Evaluation of Otologic Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current trends and usage patterns of radiographic imaging for otologic disease by specialty, length of practice, practice setting, geographic region, and pediatric volume.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Survey of physicians.

SUBJECTS

General Otolaryngologists and Otologists/Neurotologists (O/N) of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS).

METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES

An electronic questionnaire was distributed to AAO-HNS members. Respondents were separated into groups by specialty, length of practice, practice setting, region, and pediatric exposure. Chi-square tests were performed for the determination of significance.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 5,168 members of AAO-HNS. The response rate was 10.6% (n = 546) and 18.1% for only O/N (n = 143). Most respondents were generalists (74%), in practice >20 years (51%), with a primarily adult practice (95%). O/N were more often academics (44 versus 17% combined, 40% private; p < 0.001) and saw fewer children (80 fewer than 25%; p < 0.001). Compared with generalists, O/N were more likely to respond with more frequent and earlier magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization in the workup of the majority of otologic diseases. Significant differences in usage patterns for various conditions were demonstrated across all categories, but specialty training was the most common. Generalists (34 versus 12% of O/N; p < 0.001), physicians practicing >20 years (32 versus 18% of < 5 yrs; p = 0.006), and private practice physicians (34 versus 14-20% of others; p < 0.001) relied more heavily on the radiology report to interpret MRI scans.

CONCLUSION

Subspecialty training seems to be the main variable correlating with significant differences in the use of MRI and computed tomography imaging in patients with otologic disease.

Optimal Duration of MRI Follow-up to Safely Identify Middle Ear Residual Cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of non-EPI DWI for detection of residual cholesteatoma. However, limited data are available to determine the suitable duration of imaging follow-up after a first MR imaging with normal findings has been obtained. The present study aimed to determine the optimal duration of non-EPI DWI follow-up for residual cholesteatoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study was performed between 2013 and 2019 and included all participants followed up after canal wall up tympanoplasty with at least 2 non-EPI DWI examinations performed on the same 1.5T MR imaging scanner. MR images were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as a function of time after the operation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to determine the optimal follow-up duration.

RESULTS

We analyzed 47 MRIs from 17 participants. At the end of the individual follow-up period, a residual cholesteatoma had been found in 41.1% of cases. The follow-up duration ranged from 20 to 198 months (mean, 65.9 [SD, 43.9] months). Participants underwent between 2 and 5 non-EPI DWI examinations. Analyses of the receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the optimal diagnostic value of non-EPI DWI occurred 56 months after the operation when the first MR imaging performed a mean of 17.3 (SD, 6.8) months after the operation had normal findings (sensitivity = 0.71; specificity = 0.7, Youden index = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat non-EPI DWI is required to detect slow-growing middle ear residual cholesteatomas. We, therefore, recommend performing non-EPI DWI for at least the first 5 years after the initial operation.

Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The high diagnostic value of DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics is undisputed. This study compares the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with newly suspected cholesteatoma were examined with a dedicated protocol, including readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI at 1.5T. Acquisition parameters of both diffusion-weighted sequences were as follows: b=1000 s/mm,² axial and coronal section orientations, and section thickness of 3 mm. Image quality was evaluated by 2 readers on a 5-point Likert scale with respect to lesion conspicuity, the presence of susceptibility artifacts mimicking cholesteatomas, and overall subjective image quality. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using histology results as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of histologically confirmed cholesteatomas were included in the study group. Lesion conspicuity was higher and fewer artifacts were found when using TSE DWI (both P < .001). The overall subjective image quality, however, was better with readout-segmented DWI. For TSE DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 92% (95% CI, 74%-99%) and 88% (95% CI, 69%-97%), respectively, while the specificity for both readers was 80% (95% CI, 28%-99%). For readout-segmented DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-85%), while the specificity for both readers was 60% (95% CI, 15%-95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of TSE DWI is advisable for cholesteatoma diagnostics and preferable over readout-segmented DWI.

Positive predictive value for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cholesteatoma: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were first to calculate the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of DW-MRI to detect cholesteatoma and then to analyze false positives.

METHODS

All temporal bone MRI with DWI sequences performed in our pediatric university hospital between 2005 and 2015 were included retrospectively. 46 patients with a cholesteatoma diagnosis on the MRI report and who underwent surgery were studied.

RESULTS

The number of DW-MRI for identification of cholesteatoma has grown in ten years. We calculated an 89% Positive Predictive Value. DW-MRI sensitivities were 100.0% and 70.7% for respectively keratin and squamous epithelium.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI hypersignal is not synonymous of cholesteatoma diagnosis. Indeed, this diagnosis relies on the importance of a proper otoscopic examination, a suggestive medical history, CT scan data and analysis of other MRI sequences, including T1-weighted sequence, to rule out other etiologies of middle ear DW-MRI hypersignal.

Novel Radiologic Approaches for Cholesteatoma Detection: Implications for Endoscopic Ear Surgery

Technological advancement in computed tomography (CT) and MRI has improved cholesteatoma detection rates considerably in the past decade. Accurately predicting disease location and extension is essential for staging, planning, and preoperative counseling, in particular in the newer approach of endoscopic ear surgery. Improved sensitivity and specificity of these radiological methods may allow the surgeon to confidently monitor patients, therefore avoiding unnecessary surgery. This article outlines recent advances in CT and MRI technology and advantages and disadvantages of the newer techniques. Emphasis on improving the feedback loop between the radiologist and surgeon will increase the accuracy of these new technologies.

Is pediatric cholesteatoma more aggressive in children than in adults? A comparative study using the EAONO/JOS classification

INTRODUCTION

chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma (COMC) is a serious condition that may cause severe complications. According to the literature, in pediatric patients this entity can have a more aggressive behavior, leading to higher rates of morbidity. Consensus regarding the definition of aggressive and extensive cholesteatoma was lacking until recently. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology/Japan Otologic Society (EAONO/JOS) proposed a classification and staging system which was highly accepted by a group of otology experts.

OBJECTIVE

to compare cholesteatoma characteristics between pediatric and adult patients using the EAONO/JOS stating system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

a retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma treatment in a tertiary hospital was performed using EAONO/JOS classification. Congenital cholesteatoma, revision surgery, and follow-up losses were excluded. The patients were further divided into two cohorts: a pediatric group (<16 years old) and an adult group (>16 years old). The results were compared between them.

RESULTS

134 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 27 were pediatric, and 107 adult patients. We found a significant difference in supratubal recess, with higher rates of extension to this location in the pediatric group. Also in the pediatric cohort, COMC was accompanied by malleus erosion in a higher frequency, with a significant difference from adults; it also presented in higher stages of the disease according to EAONO/JOS classification. We found no differences in hearing gain post-operatively. Moreover, we found that age younger than 16 years was an independent risk factor for relapse with time.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

according to our data, cholesteatoma in pediatric age has a more aggressive and extensive nature than in adults, and age younger than 16-years-old is an independent risk factor for relapse.

Multi-operated cholesteatoma: when two surgeries are not enough

PURPOSE

Most studies regarding residual and recurrent cholesteatoma focus on single relapse. This study examines patients who had to undergo at least three surgeries for complete eradication of their cholesteatoma, with the aim of bringing to light risk factors and assessing the functional impact of multiple surgeries on hearing.

METHOD

We include 27 patients who underwent 3 consecutive surgeries for cholesteatoma between 2006 and 2016. This population represented 3.1% of all cholesteatoma operated on during that same period (868 patients).

RESULTS

Cases of multi-residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma (RRC) were significantly younger (13.1 years old), than single-RRC or cases with No-RRC (respectively, 28.0 and 38.5 years old) (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in cholesteatoma location especially for combined attical and mesotympanic location between the three groups (no-RCC 26%; single-RRC 34% and multi-RRC 66%) (p < 0.01). There was also a significant difference in ossicular erosion of the malleus, incus and stapes between the three groups (p < 0.01). In our study, the type of surgery did not influence multi-RRC rates. We did not observe any significant impact on hearing between the first and third surgeries. Mean duration between the first and second surgeries was significantly shorter for multi-RRC (14.5 months SD 8.3) than for single-RRC (23.3 months SD 18.1) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Special care should be given in case of combined attical and mesotympanic extension, ossicular erosion and young children. Delaying the realization of MRI, and/or of second-look surgery, could decrease the risk of multi-RRC.

Reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy

Objective

To assess the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted of 56 consecutive patients with suspected cholesteatoma recurrence after intact canal wall mastoidectomy who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The final diagnosis was recurrence in 38 patients and granulation tissue in 18 patients.

Results

Cholesteatoma detection on diffusion-weighted imaging based on two sets of readings had sensitivity of 94.7 and 94.7 per cent, specificity of 94.4 and 88.9 per cent, and accuracy of 94.6 and 92.8 per cent, with good intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.72,p= 0.001). Cholesteatoma detection on delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging had sensitivity of 81.6 and 78.9 per cent, specificity of 77.8 and 66.7 per cent, and accuracy of 80.4 and 75.0 per cent, with fair intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.57,p= 0.001). The mean cholesteatoma diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging was 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, with excellent intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.994,p= 0.001).

Conclusion

Diffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable method for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.

Value of DW-MRI in the preoperative evaluation of congenital cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the clinical value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in the diagnosis and staging of congenital cholesteatoma (CC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with CC. All the patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and DW-MRI preoperatively; thereafter, surgery was performed. DW-MRI examination was performed with a 3 T MRI system using three-dimensional reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance sequence. The preoperative and operative CT and DW-MRI findings were compared.

RESULTS

Using DW-MRI, cholesteatoma was successfully detected in 17 (71%) of the 24 patients with CC. Among the seven patients with false-negative results, the cholesteatoma mass diameter was <5 mm in six patients and ≥5 mm in one patient. One of these patients had open type congenital cholesteatoma (OTCC). The detection rates for closed type cholesteatoma and OTCC were 85% (17/20) and 0% (0/4), respectively, using DW-MRI. Using CT and DW-MRI, the correct stage was identified in 88% (15/17) and 59% (10/17) of the patients with aeration around the CC and in 0% (0/7) and 100% (7/7) of those without aeration around the CC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT is the primary imaging tool for evaluating suspected CC in patients with aeration around the CC. However, CT is unreliable for the detection of the extension and staging of CC when the middle ear is filled with nonspecific imaging. DW-MRI is useful for the preoperative diagnosis and staging of CC > 5 mm in diameter with or without surrounding granulation tissue. Thus, we recommend using DW- MRI at least when CT fails to localize CC as a soft tissue mass because of non-specific tissue filling the middle ear and the mastoid.