Exploring the relationship between conductive hearing loss and cleft speech characteristics in children born with cleft palate

Screening for congenital hearing impairment with brainstem evoked response audiometry in isolated orofacial cleft

Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) is the most established and recommended objective audiometric method for the clinical diagnosis of hearing impairment in high-risk infants. It is unclear whether infants with orofacial clefts meet the criteria for the high-risk group. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the need for diagnostic BERA in infants with cleft palate with or without cleft lip by assessing the predisposition to and diagnosis of congenital hearing impairment. Data from 122 patients treated at a single cleft centre were evaluated. BERA was conducted at the time of palate repair at 4-6 months of age. Clinical follow-up was analysed up to 4 years. The presence of a syndrome was examined as a risk factor for congenital hearing impairment. Among the 122 patients, four had congenital sensorineural or mixed hearing loss requiring hearing aids. All affected patients had syndromes in addition to the cleft. Most patients with elevated hearing thresholds had transient conductive hearing loss. Most suspected sensorineural hearing loss initially diagnosed was refuted. However, a higher incidence of sensorineural hearing loss was found in patients with syndromic clefts, supporting the diagnostic use of BERA with initial surgery only in patients with syndromic clefts.

Hearing Outcomes in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate in a Resource Limited Setting

To compare hearing outcomes of early versus late tympanostomy tube insertion in patients with cleft lip and palate in a resource limited setting.

Retrospective cohort study.

Conducted at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.

Included 76 patients under 18 with cleft anomalies undergoing tympanostomy tube insertion between January 2018 and July 2022, categorized into early (n = 11) and late (n = 65) tympanostomy groups.

Early tympanostomy tube placement at ≤ 3 months old, coordinated with cleft lip repair, following failed transitory evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and Type B tympanogram. Late tympanostomy tube placement preceded by a diagnosis of middle ear effusion and typically a failed TEOAE and subsequent level of testing.

Primary outcomes: normal hearing rates and age at normal hearing. Secondary outcomes: repeated tympanostomy tube placement rate, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stays.

Early tympanostomy tube placement was associated with higher rates of normal hearing (100% vs. 75%. P = .103) and significantly younger age at normal hearing (11 vs. 19 months, P = .036). Time to normal hearing was shorter in the early group. Postoperative complications, including otorrhea, occurred more frequently in the early group, but differences were not significant.

Early tympanostomy tube insertion improves hearing outcomes in pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate, achieving normal hearing at a significantly younger age. This approach offers a valuable alternative in resource-limited settings with constrained audiological services. Further research on long-term speech outcomes and cost-effectiveness is warranted.

Considering the role of speech processing in cleft-related speech sound disorders: Implications for causal pathways and classification systems

BACKGROUND

Classification systems in healthcare support shared understanding of conditions for clinical communication, service monitoring and development, and research. Children born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP+/-L) are at high risk of developing cleft-related speech sound disorder (SSD). The way cleft-related SSD is represented and described in SSD classification systems varies. Reflecting on the potential causal pathways for different cleft-related speech features, including the role of speech processing skills, may inform how cleft-related SSD is represented in classification systems.

AIM & APPROACH

To explore and reflect on how cleft-related SSD is represented in current SSD classification systems in the context of considering how speech processing skills and other factors may be involved in causal pathways of cleft speech characteristics (CSCs).

MAIN CONTRIBUTION

Variation in the representation of cleft-related SSD in classification systems is described. Potential causal pathways for passive cleft- related speech features and different active CSCs are explored. The factors involved in the development and/or persistence of different active CSCs may vary. Some factors may be specific to children born with CP+/-L, but if speech processing skills are also involved, this is an overlap with other SSD subtypes. Current evidence regarding relationships between different speech processing skills and active CSCs is limited. Implications for the representation of cleft-related SSD in SSD classification systems are discussed.

CONCLUSION

There are different categories of cleft-related speech features which are essential to understand and identify in children with cleft-related SSD to ensure appropriate management. Representation of these feature categories in classification systems could support understanding of speech in this population. Speech processing skills could be involved in the development and/or persistence of different active CSCs in individual children. Reflection and discussion on how cleft-related SSD is represented in classification systems in relation to other SSD subtypes may inform future iterations of these systems. Further work is needed to understand factors influencing the development and/or persistence of active CSCs, including speech processing skills.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Cleft-related speech sound disorder (SSD) is commonly described as being of known origin. The features of cleft-related SSD have been described extensively and several authors have also examined factors which may contribute to speech development and outcomes in children born with cleft palate +/- lip. There is limited evidence regarding the role of speech processing in the development and persistence of cleft-related SSD. What this study adds This paper reflects on how cleft-related SSD is represented in SSD classification systems in relation to key feature categories of cleft-related SSD and possible causal pathways for passive features and active cleft speech characteristics (CSCs). The role of cognitive speech processing skills is specifically considered alongside other factors that may contribute to the development of active CSCs. What are the clinical implications of this work? Causal pathways for different features of cleft-related SSD may vary, particularly between passive and active features, abut also between different active CSCs. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) need to differentially diagnose passive speech features and active CSCs. Consideration of the role of different speech processing skills and interactions with other potentially influencing factors in relation to active CSCs may inform clinical hypotheses and speech and language therapy (SLT) intervention. Representing key features of cleft-related SSD in classification systems may support understanding of cleft-related SSD in relation to other SSD subtypes.

Prediction of Preterm Birth among Infants with Orofacial Cleft Defects

OBJECTIVE

To develop risk prediction models for preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.

DESIGN

Data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry for infants with orofacial clefts born between 1999-2014 were used to develop preterm birth predictive models. Logistic regression was used to consider maternal and infant characteristics, and internal validation of the final model was performed using bootstrapping methods. The area under the curve (AUC) statistic was generated to assess model performance, and separate predictive models were built and validated for infants with cleft lip and cleft palate alone. Several secondary analyses were conducted among subgroups of interest.

SETTING

State-wide, population-based Registry data.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

6774 infants with orofacial clefts born in Texas between 1999-2014.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.

RESULTS

The final predictive model performed modestly, with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.67 among all infants with orofacial clefts. The optimism-corrected models for cleft lip (with or without cleft palate) and cleft palate alone had similar predictive capability, with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.67, respectively. Secondary analyses had similar results, but the model among infants with delivery prior to 32 weeks demonstrated higher optimism-corrected predictive capability (AUC = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a first step towards predicting preterm birth risk among infants with orofacial clefts. Identifying pregnancies affected by orofacial clefts at the highest risk for preterm birth may lead to new avenues for improving outcomes among these infants.

Timing of Primary Surgery for Cleft Palate

BACKGROUND

Among infants with isolated cleft palate, whether primary surgery at 6 months of age is more beneficial than surgery at 12 months of age with respect to speech outcomes, hearing outcomes, dentofacial development, and safety is unknown.

METHODS

We randomly assigned infants with nonsyndromic isolated cleft palate, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo standardized primary surgery at 6 months of age (6-month group) or at 12 months of age (12-month group) for closure of the cleft. Standardized assessments of quality-checked video and audio recordings at 1, 3, and 5 years of age were performed independently by speech and language therapists who were unaware of the trial-group assignments. The primary outcome was velopharyngeal insufficiency at 5 years of age, defined as a velopharyngeal composite summary score of at least 4 (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater severity). Secondary outcomes included speech development, postoperative complications, hearing sensitivity, dentofacial development, and growth.

RESULTS

We randomly assigned 558 infants at 23 centers across Europe and South America to undergo surgery at 6 months of age (281 infants) or at 12 months of age (277 infants). Speech recordings from 235 infants (83.6%) in the 6-month group and 226 (81.6%) in the 12-month group were analyzable. Insufficient velopharyngeal function at 5 years of age was observed in 21 of 235 infants (8.9%) in the 6-month group as compared with 34 of 226 (15.0%) in the 12-month group (risk ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.99; P = 0.04). Postoperative complications were infrequent and similar in the 6-month and 12-month groups. Four serious adverse events were reported (three in the 6-month group and one in the 12-month group) and had resolved at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Medically fit infants who underwent primary surgery for isolated cleft palate in adequately resourced settings at 6 months of age were less likely to have velopharyngeal insufficiency at the age of 5 years than those who had surgery at 12 months of age. (Funded by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; TOPS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00993551.).

Articulating the issues: speech assessment and intervention in cleft lip and palate

This paper describes the impact of cleft lip and palate on speech. It provides an overview for the dental clinician of the key issues affecting speech development and clarity. The paper summarises the complex speech mechanism and cleft-related factors that affect speech, including palatal, dental and occlusal anomalies. It outlines the framework for speech assessment throughout the cleft pathway and provides a description of cleft speech disorder, as well as describing treatment approaches for cleft speech and velopharyngeal dysfunction.This is followed by a spotlight on speech prosthetics for treating nasal speech, with an emphasis on joint management by the Speech and Language Therapist and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry. This includes the core multidisciplinary approach, clinician and patient-reported outcome measures, and brief discussion of national developments in this area.The importance of multidisciplinary cleft care is highlighted and, within this, the essential interaction between speech and dental clinicians in providing routine care, as well as in delivering a highly specialist speech prosthetics service.