Esophagus sparing with IMRT in lung tumor irradiation: An EUD-based optimization technique

Dosimetric impact of MLC positional errors on dose distribution in IMRT

Optimizing the positional accuracy of multileaf collimators (MLC) for radiotherapy is important for dose accuracy and for reducing doses delivered to normal tissues. This study investigates dose sensitivity variations and complexity metrics of MLC positional error in volumetric modulated arc therapy and determines the acceptable ranges of MLC positional accuracy in several clinical situations. Treatment plans were generated for four treatment sites (prostate cancer, lung cancer, spinal, and brain metastases) using different treatment planning systems (TPSs) and fraction sizes. Each treatment plan introduced 0.25-2.0 mm systematic or random MLC leaf bank errors. The generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) sensitivity and complexity metrics (MU/Gy and plan irregularity) were calculated, and the correlation coefficients were assessed. Furthermore, the required tolerances for MLC positional accuracy control were calculated. The gEUD sensitivity showed the highest dependence of systematic positional error on the treatment site, followed by TPS and fraction size. The gEUD sensitivities were 6.7, 4.5, 2.5, and 1.7%/mm for Monaco and 8.9, 6.2, 3.4, and 2.3%/mm (spinal metastasis, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and brain metastasis, respectively) for RayStation. The gEUD sensitivity was strongly correlated with the complexity metrics (r = 0.88-0.93). The minimum allowable positional error for MLC was 0.63, 0.34, 1.02, and 0.28 mm (prostate, lung, brain, and spinal metastasis, respectively). The acceptable range of MLC positional accuracy depends on the treatment site, and an appropriate tolerance should be set for each treatment site with reference to the complexity metric. It is expected to enable easier and more detailed MLC positional accuracy control than before by reducing dose errors to patients at the treatment planning stage and by controlling MLC quality based on complexity metrics, such as MU/Gy.

Prospects for online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry.

METHODS

The study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUDCTV) and organs-at-risk (EUDOAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation.

RESULTS

Altogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUDCTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUDCTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6-99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8-88.7%). While the EUDCTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUDOAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.

Fractionation versus Adaptation for Compensation of Target Volume Changes during Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer: Answers from a Prospective Registry

Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows adaptation of the dose distribution to the anatomy captured by with pre-adaptation imaging. ART is time-consuming, and thus intra-fractional deformations can occur. This prospective registry study analyzed the effects of intra-fraction deformations of clinical target volume (CTV) on the equivalent uniform dose (EUDCTV) of focal bladder cancer radiotherapy. Using margins of 5-10 mm around CTV on pre-adaptation imaging, intra-fraction CTV-deformations found in a second imaging study reduced the 10th percentile of EUDCTV values per fraction from 101.1% to 63.2% of the prescribed dose. Dose accumulation across fractions of a series was determined with deformable-image registration and worst-case dose accumulation that maximizes the correlation of cold spots. A strong fractionation effect was demonstrated-the EUDCTV was above 95% and 92.5% as determined by the two abovementioned accumulation methods, respectively, for all series of dose fractions. A comparison of both methods showed that the fractionation effect caused the EUDCTV of a series to be insensitive to EUDCTV-declines per dose fraction, and this could be explained by the small size and spatial variations of cold spots. Therefore, ART for each dose fraction is unnecessary, and selective ART for fractions with large inter-fractional deformations alone is sufficient for maintaining a high EUDCTV for a radiotherapy series.

Radial Data Mining to Identify Density-Dose Interactions That Predict Distant Failure Following SABR

Purpose

Lower dose outside the planned treatment area in lung stereotactic radiotherapy has been linked to increased risk of distant metastasis (DM) possibly due to underdosage of microscopic disease (MDE). Independently, tumour density on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) has been linked to risk of MDE. No studies have investigated the interaction between imaging biomarkers and incidental dose. The interaction would showcase whether the impact of dose on outcome is dependent on imaging and, hence, if imaging could inform which patients require dose escalation outside the gross tumour volume (GTV). We propose an image-based data mining methodology to investigate density-dose interactions radially from the GTV to predict DM with no a priori assumption on location.

Methods

Dose and density were quantified in 1-mm annuli around the GTV for 199 patients with early-stage lung cancer treated with 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Each annulus was summarised by three density and three dose parameters. For parameter combinations, Cox regressions were performed including a dose-density interaction in independent annuli. Heatmaps were created that described improvement in DM prediction due to the interaction. Regions of significant improvement were identified and studied in overall outcome models.

Results

Dose-density interactions were identified that significantly improved prediction for over 50% of bootstrap resamples. Dose and density parameters were not significant when the interaction was omitted. Tumour density variance and high peritumour density were associated with DM for patients with more cold spots (less than 30-Gy EQD2) and non-uniform dose about 3 cm outside of the GTV. Associations identified were independent of the mean GTV dose.

Conclusions

Patients with high tumour variance and peritumour density have increased risk of DM if there is a low and non-uniform dose outside the GTV. The dose regions are independent of tumour dose, suggesting that incidental dose may play an important role in controlling occult disease. Understanding such interactions is key to identifying patients who will benefit from dose-escalation. The methodology presented allowed spatial dose-density interactions to be studied at the exploratory stage for the first time. This could accelerate the clinical implementation of imaging biomarkers by demonstrating the impact of incidental dose for tumours of varying characteristics in routine data.

A dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of VMAT following mastectomy for patients with left-sided breast cancer

Background

To compare the dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), secondary cancer complication probabilities (SCCP), and excess absolute risk (EAR) differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for left-sided breast cancer after mastectomy.

Methods and materials

Thirty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) were randomly enrolled in this study. Both IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were created for each patient. Planning target volume (PTV) doses for the chest wall and internal mammary nodes, PTV1, and PTV of the supraclavicular nodes, PTV2, of 50 Gy were prescribed in 25 fractions. The plans were evaluated based on PTV1 and PTV2 coverage, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index, conformity number (CN), dose to organs at risk, NTCP, SCCP, EAR, number of monitors units, and beam delivery time.

Results

VMAT resulted in more homogeneous chest wall coverage than did IMRT. The percent volume of PTV1 that received the prescribed dose of VMRT and IMRT was 95.9 ± 1.2% and 94.5 ± 1.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The HI was 0.11 ± 0.01 for VMAT and 0.12 ± 0.02 for IMRT, respectively (p = 0.001). The VMAT plan had better conformity (CN: 0.84 ± 0.02 vs. 0.78 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) in PTV compared with IMRT. As opposed to IMRT plans, VMAT delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (11.5 Gy vs 12.6 Gy) and heart (5.2 Gy vs 6.0 Gy) and significantly reduced the V₅, V₁₀, V_20, V_30, and V₄₀ of the ipsilateral lung and heart; only the differences in V₅ of the ipsilateral lung did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.409). Although the volume of the ipsilateral lung and heart encompassed by the 2.5 Gy isodose line (V_2.5) was increased by 6.7% and 7.7% (p < 0.001, p = 0.002), the NTCP was decreased by 0.8% and 0.6%, and SCCP and EAR were decreased by 1.9% and 0.1% for the ipsilateral lung. No significant differences were observed in the contralateral lung/breast V_2.5, V_5, V₁₀, V₂₀, mean dose, SCCP, and EAR. Finally, VMAT reduced the number of monitor units by 31.5% and the treatment time by 71.4%, as compared with IMRT.

Conclusions

Compared with IMRT, VMAT is the optimal technique for PMRT patients with left-sided breast cancer due to better target coverage, a lower dose delivered, NTCP, SCCP, and EAR to the ipsilateral lung and heart, similar doses delivered to the contralateral lung and breast, fewer monitor units and a shorter delivery time.

Effect of MU-weighted multi-leaf collimator position error on dose distribution of SBRT radiotherapy in peripheral non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Position accuracy of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) is essential in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study is aimed to investigate the dosimetric impacts of the MU-weighted MLC positioning uncertainties of SBRT for patients with early stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Three types of MLC position error were simulated: Type 1, random error; Type 2, system shift, in which both MLC banks shifted to the left or right direction; and Type 3, in which both MLC banks moved with same magnitudes in the opposite directions. Two baseline plans were generated: an automatic plan (AP) and a manually optimized plan (MP). Multi-leaf collimator position errors were introduced to generate simulated plans with the preset MLC leaf position errors, which were then reimported into the Pinnacle system to generate simulated plans, respectively. The dosimetric parameters (CI, nCI, GI, etc.) and gEUD values of PTV and OARs were calculated. Linear regression between MU-weighted/unweighted MLC position error and gEUD was performed to obtain dose sensitivity.

RESULTS

The dose sensitivities of the PTVs were -4.93, -38.94, -41.70, -55.55, and 30.33 Gy/mm for random, left shift, right shift, system close, and system open MLC errors, respectively. There were significant differences between the MU-weighted and the unweighted dose sensitivity, which was -38.94 Gy/mm vs -3.42 Gy/mm (left shift), -41.70 Gy/mm vs -3.56 Gy/mm (right shift), -55.55 Gy/mm vs -4.84 Gy/mm (system close), and 30.33 vs 2.64 Gy/mm (system open). For the system open/close MLC errors, as the PTV volume became larger, the dose sensitivity decreased. APs provided smaller dose sensitivity for the system shift and system close MLC errors compared to the conventional MPs.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant difference in dose sensitivity between MU-weighted and unweighted MLC position error of SBRT radiotherapy in peripheral NSCLC. MU is suggested to be included in the dosimetric evaluation of the MLC misalignments, since it is much closer to clinical radiotherapy.

The Special Medical Physics Consult Process for Reirradiation Patients

Purpose

To present a systematic approach to the reirradiation special medical physics consult (ReRT-SMPC) process.

Materials and Methods

An in-house reirradiation committee of physicians and physicists was formed to develop a streamlined and well-documented approach to ReRT-SMPCs. Dosimetric goals and considerations for tissue repair were generated by the committee with input from the literature, clinical trial guidelines, and physician experience. Procedural workflow was also defined.

Results

The total number of ReRT-SMPCs performed in our department in 2018 was 401, corresponding to 369 unique patients and 16% of the total number of patients receiving external beam radiation in our department that year. This constituted a large increase over the 183 ReRT-SMPCs performed in 2017. We have found that a standardized ReRT-SMPC workflow helps to safeguard patients, documents the clinical decision-making process for medical and legal purposes, and facilitates the peer-review process. The data being collected from each consult along with toxicity and outcomes data can be used to help inform future re-treatment guidelines.

Conclusions

As the number of patients returning for additional courses of radiation continues to increase, a uniform method for the ReRT-SMPC workflow and analysis is a powerful tool for ensuring patient safety, understanding and predicting treatment toxicity, and refining reirradiation dosimetric limits.

Frontiers in planning optimization for lung SBRT

Emerging data are showing the safety and the efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung cancer management. In this context, the very high doses delivered to the Planning Target Volume, make the planning phase essential for achieving high dose levels conformed to the shape of the target in order to have a good prognosis for tumor control and to avoid an overdose in relevant healthy adjacent tissue. In this non-systematic review we analyzed the technological and the physics aspects of SBRT planning for lung cancer. In particular, the aims of the study were: (i) to evaluate prescription strategies (homogeneous or inhomogeneous), (ii) to outline possible geometrical solutions by comparing the dosimetric results (iii) to describe the technological possibilities for a safe and effective treatment, (iv) to present the issues concerning radiobiological planning and the automation of the planning process.

Incorporating big data into treatment plan evaluation: Development of statistical DVH metrics and visualization dashboards

Purpose

To develop statistical dose-volume histogram (DVH)–based metrics and a visualization method to quantify the comparison of treatment plans with historical experience and among different institutions.

Methods and materials

The descriptive statistical summary (ie, median, first and third quartiles, and 95% confidence intervals) of volume-normalized DVH curve sets of past experiences was visualized through the creation of statistical DVH plots. Detailed distribution parameters were calculated and stored in JavaScript Object Notation files to facilitate management, including transfer and potential multi-institutional comparisons. In the treatment plan evaluation, structure DVH curves were scored against computed statistical DVHs and weighted experience scores (WESs). Individual, clinically used, DVH-based metrics were integrated into a generalized evaluation metric (GEM) as a priority-weighted sum of normalized incomplete gamma functions. Historical treatment plans for 351 patients with head and neck cancer, 104 with prostate cancer who were treated with conventional fractionation, and 94 with liver cancer who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy were analyzed to demonstrate the usage of statistical DVH, WES, and GEM in a plan evaluation. A shareable dashboard plugin was created to display statistical DVHs and integrate GEM and WES scores into a clinical plan evaluation within the treatment planning system. Benchmarking with normal tissue complication probability scores was carried out to compare the behavior of GEM and WES scores.

Results

DVH curves from historical treatment plans were characterized and presented, with difficult-to-spare structures (ie, frequently compromised organs at risk) identified. Quantitative evaluations by GEM and/or WES compared favorably with the normal tissue complication probability Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model, transforming a set of discrete threshold-priority limits into a continuous model reflecting physician objectives and historical experience.

Conclusions

Statistical DVH offers an easy-to-read, detailed, and comprehensive way to visualize the quantitative comparison with historical experiences and among institutions. WES and GEM metrics offer a flexible means of incorporating discrete threshold-prioritizations and historic context into a set of standardized scoring metrics. Together, they provide a practical approach for incorporating big data into clinical practice for treatment plan evaluations.

Investigation of the reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of gated IMRT delivery with a commercial linear accelerator

This work reports an investigation on the reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery with a commercial linear accelerator. The dosimetry measurements of segmented multileaf collimated IMRT (SMLC-IMRT) were performed by using radiographic films and a two-dimensional diode array. Testing involved a series of IMRT fields from actual patients combined with some manually generated fields. To examine the delivery time, dosimetry plans of standard beamlet IMRT, direct-aperture-optimized (DAO) IMRT, compensator IMRT, and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with wedges were delivered with and without gating. The results demonstrated that the gated SMLC-IMRT can be reliably and accurately delivered on this type of accelerators, as long as extremely high interruption frequencies and very low number of monitor units per segment are avoided. Beam flatness exceeded 5% and monitor linearity deviated more than 3% for the gated operation with 2.5 s breathing cycle and 20% duty cycle with segment sizes less than 10 MU. Gating does not change multi leaf collimator (MLC) positioning accuracy. The DAO IMRT is preferred for gated delivery because of its short delivery time.

Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Robust optimization for IMPT takes setup and range uncertainties into account during plan optimization. However, anatomical changes were not prospectively included. The purpose of this study was to examine robustness and dose variation due to setup uncertainty and anatomical change in IMPT of lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plans were generated with multi-field optimization based on planning target volume (MFO-PTV) and worst-case robust optimization (MFO-RO) on simulation computed tomography scans (CT0) for nine patients. Robustness was evaluated on the CT0 by computing the standard deviation of DVH (SD-DVH). Dose variations calculated on weekly CTs were compared with SD-DVH. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) change from the original plan on weekly dose was also calculated for both plans.

RESULTS

SD-DVH and dose variation on weekly CTs were both significantly lower in the MFO-RO plans than in the MFO-PTV plans for targets, lungs, and the esophagus (p<0.05). When comparing EUD for ITV between weekly and planned dose distributions, three patients and 28% of repeated CTs for MFO-RO plans, and six patients and 44% of repeated CTs for MFO-PTV plans, respectively, showed an EUD change of >5%.

CONCLUSIONS

RO in IMPT reduces the dose variation due to setup uncertainty and anatomy changes during treatment compared with PTV-based planning. However, dose variation could still be substantial; repeated imaging and adaptive planning as needed are highly recommended for IMPT of lung tumors.

Prediction of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent low-dose Cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used with concurrent chemotherapy but toxicity data are not well investigated. We correlated clinical and dosimetric parameters with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with IMRT and concurrent low-dose cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed age, PS, comorbidities, gross tumor volume, and the volume of the esophagus irradiated with 50 Gy (V50oes) in relation with acute toxicity. The mean lung dose (MLD) and pulmonary toxicity was described. Treatment consisted of 24 × 2, 75 Gy, and daily cisplatin 6 mg/m². Patients with an MLD ≥ 20 Gy or a PS > 2 were excluded from CCRT. Toxicity was prospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events version 3.0. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied for scoring comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regressions for toxicity and survival estimates (Kaplan-Meier) were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2011, 188 patients received standard CCRT. In 35% of the patients, acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 was reported. Grade 5 toxicity was scored in 1% of the patients. V50oes (odds ratio [OR], 1.33 per 10% increase; P = .01) and PS ≥ 2 (OR, 3.45; P = .07) were significantly correlated with acute toxicity ≥ grade 3. No differences in toxicity were observed between age groups (< 70 and ≥ 70; P = .26), and those with a CCI score < 5 and ≥ 5, and acute severe toxicity (P = .36). Grade ≥ 3 pulmonary toxicity was seen in 7%. The 1- and 2-year overall survival in stage III disease were 78% and 52%, respectively. Patients with a poor PS or a high CCI score had similar survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent low-dose cisplatin using IMRT is effective in a large cohort of consecutive patients with NSCLC and life threatening toxicity is rare (1%). PS ≥ 2 and V50oes are correlated with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3.

Combining advanced radiotherapy technologies to maximize safety and tumor control probability in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current study was to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) of advanced radiotherapy technologies for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate potential interplay effects between their applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with conventionally fractionated doses of 66 Gy served as reference for 13 patients with stage III NSCLC. Isotoxic dose escalation relative to the corresponding 3D-CRT plans was performed for three technologies and their combinations: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), IMRT with a simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) of 10% to the gross tumor volume (GTV), and adaptive re-planning twice during the treatment course (ART). All analyses were based on accumulated dose distributions using deformable image registration of CT images, which were acquired weekly during the treatment course.

RESULTS

IMRT reduced the mean lung dose (MLD) by 5.6% ± 3.8% compared to 3D-CRT. ART resulted in lung sparing of 7.9% ± 4.8% and 9.2% ± 3.9% in 3D-CRT and IMRT planning, respectively. IMRT and ART escalated the irradiation dose by 6.6% ± 3.2% and 8.8% ± 6.3%, respectively, which was not statistically different. For the 7 patients with the largest GTVs, IMRT-SIB was superior to IMRT and ART with dose escalation of 11.9% ± 3.7%. The combination of ART, IMRT, and SIB achieved maximum dose escalation in all 13 patients by 17.1% ± 5.4% on average, which increased TCP from 19.9% ± 7.0 to 37.1% ± 10.1%. Adaptive re-planning was required to continuously conform the escalated and hypofractionated SIB doses to the shrinking tumor.

CONCLUSION

Combining advanced radiotherapy technologies is considered as a safe and effective strategy to maximize local tumor control probability in stage III NSCLC.

[Esophageal toxicity of radiation therapy: clinical risk factors and management]

Acute radiation-induced esophagitis includes all clinical symptoms (odynophagia, dysphagia) occurring within 90 days after thoracic irradiation start. Its severity can be graded using RTOG and CTCAE scales. The clinical risk factors are: age, female gender, initial performance status, pre-therapeutic body mass index, pre-therapeutic dysphagia, tumoral and nodal stage, delivered dose, accelerated hyperfractionned radiotherapy, concomitant association of chemotherapy to radiotherapy and response to the treatment. The dosimetric parameters predictive of esophagitis are: mean dose, V(20Gy), V(30Gy), V(40Gy), V(45Gy) and V(50Gy). Amifostine is the only drug to have a proven radioprotective efficacy (evidence level C, ESMO recommendation grade III). The medical management of esophagitis associates a diet excluding irritant food, medication against gastroesophageal reflux, analgesic treatment according to the WHO scale and management of dehydration and denutrition by enteral feeding.

Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this work was to evaluate the potential benefit of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) compared to free breathing (FB) radiotherapy in a homogeneous population of patients with lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 25 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by DIBH underwent an additional FB CT scan. The DIBH and FB treatment plans were compared. Target volume was compared using coverage, homogeneity, and conformal indices. Organs at risk were compared using V(5), V(13), V(20), V(25), V(37), mean dose (D(mean)) for lungs, V(40) and D(mean) for the heart, V(50), D(mean) and maximum dose (D(max)) for the esophagus, and using biological indices, i.e., the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

RESULTS

Median age was 62 years. Prescribed total dose was 66 Gy. Conformity index was improved with DIBH (0.67 vs. 0.58, p = 0.046) but coverage and homogeneity indices were not significantly different. Lung dosimetric parameters were improved using DIBH: D(mean) (13 vs. 15 Gy, p = 10(-4)), V(5) (43 vs. 51%, p = 6.10(-5)), V(13) (31 vs. 38%, p = 2.10(-3)), V(20) (25 vs. 31%, p = 0.01), V(25) (22% vs. 27%, p = 0.01) and V(37) (12 vs. 16%, p = 0.03), EUD (8.2 vs. 9.9 Gy, p = 3.10(-4)), and NTCP (1.9 vs. 4.8%, p = 10(-3)). For the heart, D(mean) (14 vs. 17 Gy, p = 0.003), V(40) (12 vs. 17%, p = 0.004), and EUD (19 vs. 22 Gy, p = 6.10(-4)) were reduced with DIBH, whereas V(30) and NTCP were similar. DIBH improved the D(mean) (28 vs. 30 Gy, p = 0.007) and V(50) (25 vs. 30%, p = 0.003) for the esophagus, while EUD, NTCP, and D(max) were not altered.

CONCLUSION

DIBH improves the target conformity index and heart and lung dosimetry in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The clinical implications of these findings should be confirmed.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dose-escalation planning study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential for dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in positron emission tomography-based radiotherapy planning for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 35 LA-NSCLC patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT plans were made to a prescription dose (PD) of 66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Dose escalation was performed toward the maximal PD using secondary endpoint constraints for the lung, spinal cord, and heart, with de-escalation according to defined esophageal tolerance. Dose calculation was performed using the Eclipse pencil beam algorithm, and all plans were recalculated using a collapsed cone algorithm. The normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for the lung (Grade 2 pneumonitis) and esophagus (acute toxicity, grade 2 or greater, and late toxicity).

RESULTS

IMRT resulted in statistically significant decreases in the mean lung (p <.0001) and maximal spinal cord (p = .002 and 0005) doses, allowing an average increase in the PD of 8.6-14.2 Gy (p ≤.0001). This advantage was lost after de-escalation within the defined esophageal dose limits. The lung normal tissue complication probabilities were significantly lower for IMRT (p <.0001), even after dose escalation. For esophageal toxicity, IMRT significantly decreased the acute NTCP values at the low dose levels (p = .0009 and p <.0001). After maximal dose escalation, late esophageal tolerance became critical (p <.0001), especially when using IMRT, owing to the parallel increases in the esophageal dose and PD.

CONCLUSION

In LA-NSCLC, IMRT offers the potential to significantly escalate the PD, dependent on the lung and spinal cord tolerance. However, parallel increases in the esophageal dose abolished the advantage, even when using collapsed cone algorithms. This is important to consider in the context of concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules using IMRT.

Treatment planning study to determine potential benefit of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conformal radiotherapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies

PURPOSE

To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with conformal RT (CRT) for hypofractionated isotoxicity liver RT and explore dose escalation using IMRT for the same/improved nominal risk of liver toxicity in a treatment planning study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 26 CRT plans were evaluated. Prescription doses (24-54 Gy within six fractions) were individualized on the basis of the effective liver volume irradiated maintaining < or =5% risk of radiation-induced liver disease. The dose constraints included bowel (0.5 cm(3)) and stomach (0.5 cm(3)) to < or =30 Gy, spinal cord to < or =25 Gy, and planning target volume (PTV) to < or =140% of the prescribed dose. Two groups were evaluated: (1) PTV overlapping or directly adjacent to serial functioning normal tissues (n = 14), and (2) the liver as the dose-limiting normal tissue (n = 12). IMRT plans using direct machine parameter optimization maintained the CRT plan beam arrangements, an estimated radiation-induced liver disease risk of 5%, and underwent dose escalation, if all normal tissue constraints were maintained.

RESULTS

IMRT improved PTV coverage in 19 of 26 plans (73%). Dose escalation was feasible in 9 cases by an average of 3.8 Gy (range, 0.6-13.2) in six fractions. Three of seven plans without improved PTV coverage had small gross tumor volumes (< or =105 cm(3)) already receiving 54 Gy, the maximal prescription dose allowed. In the remaining cases, the PTV range was 9.6-689 cm(3); two had overlapped organs at risk; and one had four targets. IMRT did not improve these plans owing to poor target coverage (n = 2) and nonliver (n = 2) dose limits.

CONCLUSION

Direct machine parameter optimization IMRT improved PTV coverage while maintaining normal tissue tolerances in most CRT liver plans. Dose escalation was possible in a minority of patients.

On the parameter describing the generalised equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for tumours

The purpose of the present work was to estimate the parameter 'a' describing the generalised equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for tumours and its dependence on radiobiological parameters. The consequences of uncertainties in a on the gEUD were also studied. An estimate of a was found by requiring that, for a given target dose distribution, the mechanistic EUD (based on radiobiological linear quadratic modelling) equals gEUD. The estimate of a was found to depend on the dose distribution, and decreased with factors that increase the slope of the cell survival curve (i.e. decreasing alpha/beta values and increasing alpha values). Furthermore, the parameter a was estimated for 35 prostate cancer IMRT plans of varying dose distributions, for two sets of previously published radiobiological parameters: (1) alpha=0.15 Gy(-1) and alpha/beta=3 Gy, and (2) alpha=0.26 Gy(-1) and alpha/beta=10 Gy. The estimated values of a ranged from -25.6 to -22.4 for all combinations of dose distributions and parameter sets. Uncertainties in a were found to give only small uncertainties in gEUD. Although the current work shows limitations of the gEUD model for tumours, gEUD may still be preferable for biological treatment plan optimization, evaluation and reporting.

Self-consistent tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability models based on generalized EUDa)

Traditional methods to compute the tumor control probability (TCP) or normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) typically require a heterogeneous radiation dose distribution to be converted into a simple uniform dose distribution with an equivalent biological effect. Several power-law type dose-volume-histogram reduction schemes, particularly Niemierko's generalized equivalent uniform dose model [Med. Phys. 26, 1000 (1999)], have been proposed to achieve this goal. In this study, we carefully examine the mathematical outcome of these schemes. We demonstrate that (1) for tumors, with each tumor cell independently responding to local radiation dose, a closed-form analytical solution for tumor survival fraction and TCP can be obtained; (2) for serial structured normal tissues, an exponential power-law form relating survival to functional sub-unit (FSU) radiation is required, and a closed-form analytical solution for the related NTCP is provided; (3) in the case of a parallel structured normal tissue, when NTCP is determined solely by the number of the surviving FSUs, a mathematical solution is available only when there is a non-zero threshold dose and/or a finite critical dose defining the radiotherapy response. Some discussion is offered for the partial irradiation effect on normal tissues in this category; (4) for normal tissues with alternative architectures, where the radiation response of FSU is inhomogeneous, there is no exact global mathematical solution for SF or NTCP within the available schemes. Finally, numerical fits of our models to some experimental data are also presented.

Potential for dose-escalation and reduction of risk in pancreatic cancer using IMRT optimization with lexicographic ordering and gEUD-based cost functions

Radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer is limited by the tolerance of local organs at risk (OARs) and frequent overlap of the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR volumes. Using lexicographic ordering (LO), a hierarchical optimization technique, with generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) cost functions, we studied the potential of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to increase the dose to pancreatic tumors and to areas of vascular involvement that preclude surgical resection [surgical boost volume (SBV)]. We compared 15 forward planned three-dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and IMRT treatment plans for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. We created IMRT plans optimized using LO with gEUD-based cost functions that account for the contribution of each part of the resulting inhomogeneous dose distribution. LO-IMRT plans allowed substantial PTV dose escalation compared with 3DCRT; median increase from 52 Gy to 66 Gy (a=-5,p<0.005) and median increase from 50 Gy to 59 Gy (a=-15,p<0.005). LO-IMRT also allowed increases to 85 Gy in the SBV, regardless of a value, along with significant dose reductions in OARs. We conclude that LO-IMRT with gEUD cost functions could allow dose escalation in pancreas tumors with concomitant reduction in doses to organs at risk as compared with traditional 3DCRT.

Dosimetric validation of the MCNPX Monte Carlo simulation for radiobiologic studies of megavoltage grid radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To validate the MCNPX Monte Carlo simulation for radiobiologic studies of megavoltage grid radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

EDR2 films, a scanning water phantom with microionization chamber and MCNPX Monte Carlo code, were used to study the dosimetric characteristics of a commercially available megavoltage grid therapy collimator. The measured dose profiles, ratios between maximum and minimum doses at 1.5 cm depth, and percentage depth dose curve were compared with those obtained in the simulations. The simulated two-dimensional dose profile and the linear-quadratic formalism of cell survival were used to calculate survival statistics of tumor and normal cells for the treatment of melanoma with a list of doses of the fractionated grid therapy.

RESULTS

A good agreement between the simulated and measured dose data was found. The therapeutic ratio based on normal cell survival has been defined and calculated for treating both the acute and late responding melanoma tumors. The grid therapy in this study was found to be advantageous for treating the acutely responding tumors, but not for late responding tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Monte Carlo technique was demonstrated to be able to provide the dosimetric characteristics for grid therapy. The therapeutic ratio was dependent not only on the single alpha/beta value, but also on the individual alpha and beta values. Acutely responding tumors and radiosensitive normal tissues are more suitable for using the grid therapy.

The Clinical Application of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a delivery system that, when coupled with a treatment-planning optimization system, presents the opportunity to conform the dose to the target better than 3-dimensional conformal therapy, particularly in the case of concave targets. Appropriate clinical applications of this technology to challenging patient treatment scenarios requires careful consideration of issues related to target volume-dose heterogeneity and the influence of patient setup uncertainties. These issues are reviewed and illustrated. To date, clinical reports of these treatments for prostate and head and neck cancers have the most mature data. Those results are summarized here. Future applications of this technology can be expected to take careful, considered advantage of this technology to further rearrange dose distributions across target volumes to produce an integrated overall gain in treatment objectives. However, these innovative applications need to be approached with caution, preferably in prospective clinical trials that would help determine if the hypothetical clinical benefits are in fact realizable.

Potential benefits of using non coplanar field and intensity modulated radiation therapy to preserve the heart in irradiation of lung tumors in the middle and lower lobes

PURPOSE

Investigate whether the use of non coplanar fields and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the heart, in irradiation of middle and lower lung tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four plans are compared on 10 CT scans: (1) a reference plan, corresponding to coplanar plan of 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT); (2) a 3DCRT(noncopl) plan, differing from reference plan by the change of one field in non coplanar fields; (3) an IMRT(copl) plan optimized on the same coplanar plan as reference plan; and (4) an IMRT(noncopl) plan optimized on the same non coplanar beams as 3DCRT(noncopl) plan. The equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for PTV was 74 Gy in 37 fractions.

RESULTS

In all plans, the 95% isodose surface covers at least 99% of the PTV with very similar conformity index values. A significant reduction in EUD, V30, V40 and V50 is observed for heart when either non coplanar fields or IMRT is used. IMRT also reduces the lung NTCP, V5, V13, V20 and V30 values and esophagus NTCP.

CONCLUSION

Both the use of non coplanar fields and IMRT dramatically reduces the dose received by the heart. The largest benefit is seen when the two techniques are combined.

Impact of geometrical uncertainties on 3D CRT and IMRT dose distributions for lung cancer treatment

PURPOSE

To quantify the effect of set-up errors and respiratory motion on dose distributions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Irradiations of 5 NSCLC patients were planned with 3 techniques, two (conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT1)) with a homogeneous dose in the planning target volume (PTV) and a third (IMRT2) with dose heterogeneity. Set-up errors were simulated for gross target volume (GTV) and organs at risk (OARs). For the GTV, the respiration was also simulated with a periodical motion around a varying average. Two configurations were studied for the breathing motion, to describe the situations of free-breathing (FB) and respiration-correlated (RC) CT scans, each with 2 amplitudes (5 and 10 mm), thus resulting in 4 scenarios (FB_5, FB_10, RC_5 and RC_10). Five thousand treatment courses were simulated, producing probability distributions for the dosimetric parameters.

RESULTS

For CRT and IMRT1, RC_5, RC_10 and FB_5 were associated with a small degradation of the GTV coverage. IMRT2 with FB_10 showed the largest deterioration of the GTV dosimetric indices, reaching 7% for Dmin at the 95% probability level. Removing the systematic error due to the periodic breathing motion was advantageous for a 10 mm respiration amplitude. The estimated probability of radiation pneumonitis and acute complication for the esophagus showed limited sensitivity to geometrical uncertainties. Dmax in the spinal cord and the parameters predicting the risk of late esophageal toxicity were associated to a probability up to 50% of violating the dose tolerances.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulating the effect of geometrical uncertainties on the individual patient plan should become part of the standard pre-treatment verification procedure.

The clinical implementation of respiratory-gated intensity-modulated radiotherapy

The clinical use of respiratory-gated radiotherapy and the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are 2 relatively new innovations to the treatment of lung cancer. Respiratory gating can reduce the deleterious effects of intrafraction motion, and IMRT can concurrently increase tumor dose homogeneity and reduce dose to critical structures including the lungs, spinal cord, esophagus, and heart. The aim of this work is to describe the clinical implementation of respiratory-gated IMRT for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Documented clinical procedures were developed to include a tumor motion study, gated CT imaging, IMRT treatment planning, and gated IMRT delivery. Treatment planning procedures for respiratory-gated IMRT including beam arrangements and dose-volume constraints were developed. Quality assurance procedures were designed to quantify both the dosimetric and positional accuracy of respiratory-gated IMRT, including film dosimetry dose measurements and Monte Carlo dose calculations for verification and validation of individual patient treatments. Respiratory-gated IMRT is accepted by both treatment staff and patients. The dosimetric and positional quality assurance test results indicate that respiratory-gated IMRT can be delivered accurately. If carefully implemented, respiratory-gated IMRT is a practical alternative to conventional thoracic radiotherapy. For mobile tumors, respiratory-gated radiotherapy is used as the standard of care at our institution. Due to the increased workload, the choice of IMRT is taken on a case-by-case basis, with approximately half of the non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving respiratory-gated IMRT. We are currently evaluating whether superior tumor coverage and limited normal tissue dosing will lead to improvements in local control and survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

Multiple fields may offer better esophagus sparing without increased probability of lung toxicity in optimized IMRT of lung tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether increasing numbers of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields enhance lung-tumor dose without additional predicted toxicity for difficult planning geometries.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 8 previous three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) patients with tumors located in various regions of each lung, but with planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping part of the esophagus, were used as input. Four optimized-beamlet IMRT plans (1 plan that used the 3D-CRT beam arrangement and 3 plans with 3, 5, or 7 axial, but predominantly one-sided, fields) were compared. For IMRT, the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) in the whole PTV was optimized simultaneously with that in a reduced PTV exclusive of the esophagus. Normal-tissue complication probability-based costlets were used for the esophagus, heart, and lung.

RESULTS

Overall, IMRT plans (optimized by use of EUD to judiciously allow relaxed PTV dose homogeneity) result in better minimum PTV isodose surface coverage and better average EUD values than does conformal planning; dose generally increases with the number of fields. Even 7-field plans do not significantly alter normal-lung mean-dose values or lung volumes that receive more than 13, 20, or 30 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Optimized many-field IMRT plans can lead to escalated lung-tumor dose in the special case of esophagus overlapping PTV, without unacceptable alteration in the dose distribution to normal lung.

Normal tissue complication probability modeling for acute esophagitis in patients treated with conformal radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of a well-known normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model to predict radiation esophagitis by determining updated model parameters and then comparing these results with the predictive value of other dosimetric parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical and dosimetric data regarding esophagitis were analyzed in 101 inoperable/unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated by external beam irradiation. Grade 2 or higher esophagitis counted as events. Parameters (TD50, n, and m) of the Lyman normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model were determined using maximum likelihood analysis, and compared to other dose/volume threshold values including: percentage of esophagus receiving > 40 Gy (V40) to > 75 Gy (V75), and maximum esophageal doses.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients developed grade 2-3 acute esophagitis (no G4 or 5). The maximum likelihood analysis produced new Lyman model parameters of: TD50 = 51 Gy, n = 0.44 and m = 0.32. The mean NTCP value is significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the group of patients without esophagitis (13.5%) than with esophagitis (27.2%). The rates of esophagitis are 2.5, 7, 9 and 13.4%, respectively, when the NTCP values are <10%, <15%, <20% and <25%. A significant association is found between esophagitis and dose/volume parameters V40 (P = 0.001) to V70 (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

New values of TD50, n and m offer a good description of the esophagitis distribution in our population. Compared to the use of this model with previously published parameters (associated with late toxicity) predictions of the model for acute esophagitis using the new parameters would indicate that, for a population of patients, the distribution of events as a function of uniform dose would occur with a lower mean uniform dose value (smaller TD50), over a wider range of uniform doses (larger m), while also exhibiting a bigger volume effect (larger n). These new parameter values are supported in essence by the correlations found for the dose/volume threshold parameters.

Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors

PURPOSE

To investigate whether intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), optimized using the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, can increase the safe dose to intrahepatic tumors compared with three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT). A secondary objective was to investigate the optimal beam arrangement for liver IMRT plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planning CT data of 15 patients with intrahepatic tumors, previously treated with 3D-CRT, were used as input. The dose delivered using 3D-CRT had been limited either by tolerance of adjacent organs, which were close to, or overlapped with, the planning target volume (PTV; overlap cases, n = 8), or liver toxicity (nonoverlap, n = 7). IMRT plans were created using the gEUD to maximize the dose across the PTV and the NTCP to maintain the organ-at-risk toxicity to that of the conformal plan. Increased heterogeneity was allowed across the PTV in overlap cases, without compromising the minimal PTV dose of the conformal plan and restricting the maximal dose to within 110% of the mean. Three different beam arrangements were used for each case: seven-field equidistant axial, six-field noncoplanar (predominantly right-sided beams), and a reproduction of the conformal gantry angles. gEUDs were also computed and used for evaluation of the plans (regardless of planning technique) to reflect the response of both high- and low-grade tumors. The IMRT plan that allowed the greatest gEUD across the PTV was used in the comparison with the 3D-CRT plan.

RESULTS

The use of IMRT significantly increased the maximal gEUD achievable across the PTV compared with the 3D-CRT plans. This was the case for the assumptions of both high- and low-grade tumors, irrespective of the tumor position within the liver. The mean gEUD increase was 11 Gy (high grade) and 18.0 Gy (low grade) for overlap cases (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) and 10 Gy for nonoverlap cases (p = 0.020). When comparing the IMRT beam arrangements, gEUDs were considered equivalent if they differed by less than one fraction (1.5 Gy). In overlap cases (n = 8), an equivalent "best" gEUD value was obtained in 3, 5, and 7 cases for the original conformal angle, seven-field axial, and six-field noncoplanar plan, respectively. The corresponding results were 5, 2, and 3 in the cases without an overlap (n = 7).

CONCLUSION

We have successfully used mathematical/biologic models directly as cost functions within the optimizing process to produce IMRT plans that maximize the gEUD while maintaining compliance with a well-defined protocol for the treatment of intrahepatic cancer. For both PTV-organ-at-risk overlap and nonoverlap situations, IMRT has the capacity to improve the maximal dose achievable across the PTV, expressed in terms of the gEUD. The use of multiple noncoplanar beams appears to confer an advantage over fewer beams in cases with PTV-organ-at-risk overlap. When liver toxicity is the dose-limiting factor, high gEUD values are obtained most frequently when the field arrangement is chosen to provide the shortest possible transhepatic path length.