Effect of combined treatment with salvage radiotherapy plus androgen suppression on quality of life in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Current Status and Future Perspective on the Management of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy

Pathological lymph node involvement (pN1) after a pelvic lymph node dissection represents one of the most unfavorable prognostic factors for disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in prostate cancer. However, optimal management for pN1 patients remains unclear. Thus, the guideline from the European Association of Urology recommends discussing three following management options with pN1 patients after an extended pelvic lymph node dissection, based on nodal involvement characteristics: (i) offer adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy, (ii) offer adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy with additional radiotherapy and (iii) offer observation (expectant management) to a patient with ≤2 nodes and a prostate-specific antigen <0.1 ng/mL. Treatment intensification may reduce risks of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality, but it may increase adverse events and impair quality of life. Few randomized control trials for pN1 are under investigation. In addition, there are limited reports on the quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in patients with pN1. Therefore, more research is needed to establish an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with pN1. This review summarizes current evidence on the treatments available for men with pN1, summarizes randomized control trials that included pN1 prostate cancer, and discusses future perspectives.

Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: What Has Changed Over Time?

The role and timing of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. While recent trials support the oncological safety of early salvage RT (SRT) compared to adjuvant RT (ART) in selected patients, previous randomized studies demonstrated that ART might improve recurrence-free survival in patients at high risk for local recurrence based on adverse pathology. Although ART might improve survival, this approach is characterized by a risk of overtreatment in up to 40% of cases. SRT is defined as the administration of RT to the prostatic bed and to the surrounding tissues in the patient with PSA recurrence after surgery but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The delivery of salvage therapies exclusively in men who experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) has the potential advantage of reducing the risk of side effects without theoretically compromising outcomes. However, how to select patients at risk of progression who are more likely to benefit from a more aggressive treatment after RP, the exact timing of RT after RP, and the use of hormone therapy and its duration at the time of RT are still open issues. Moreover, what the role of novel imaging techniques and genomic classifiers are in identifying the most optimal post-operative management of PCa patients treated with RP is yet to be clarified. This narrative review summarizes most relevant published data to guide a multidisciplinary team in selecting appropriate candidates for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.

Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

For patients experiencing biochemical recurrence in the absence of distant metastasis, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the only possible curative treatment option. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and the selected use of SRT has some advantages when compared with adjuvant radiotherapy. The most important one is avoidance of a potential overtreatment of patients who would never have disease progression, even in the presence of high-risk pathological features. The identification of a specific PSA cut-off seems to be incorrect. In patients with more adverse pathological features, early SRT administered at the very first sign of a PSA rise granted better disease control. Dose-intensified SRT is feasible and well tolerated with no significant difference in grade 2 or more acute and late toxicity. At least 66 Gy must be given in the salvage setting. ADT has a radio-sensitising effect on the radiotherapy by inhibiting the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. The use of ADT in the salvage setting results in a better oncological outcome. Hormonal therapy is associated with a decrease in quality of life and side-effects depending on the duration of hormone therapy. The oncological benefit of hormone therapy duration depends on their clinical and pathological characteristics. 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography is the gold standard in staging prostate cancer patients with biochemical persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The implementation of 18F-labelled PSMA tracers can provide a further improvement.

Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT) represents a treatment option for patients who experience a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise after radical prostatectomy (RP); however, the optimal PSA level for eSRT administration is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To test the impact of PSA level on cancer control after eSRT according to pathologic tumour characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 716 node-negative patients with undetectable postoperative PSA who experienced a PSA rise after RP. All patients received eSRT, defined as local radiation to the prostate and seminal vesicle bed, delivered at PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/ml. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after eSRT was defined as two consecutive PSA values ≥ 0.2 ng/ml.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable Cox regression analysis tested the association between pre-eSRT PSA level and BCR after eSRT. Covariates consisted of pathologic stage (pT2 vs pT3a vs pT3b or higher), pathologic Gleason score (≤ 6, 7, or ≥ 8), and surgical margin status (negative vs positive). We tested an interaction with PSA level and baseline pathologic risk for the hypothesis that BCR-free survival differed by pre-eSRT PSA level. Three pathologic risk factors were identified: pathologic stage pT3b or higher, pathologic Gleason score ≥ 8, and negative surgical margins.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up among patients who did not experience BCR after eSRT was 57 mo (interquartile range: 27-105). At 5 yr after eSRT, BCR-free survival rate was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78-85). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, pre-eSRT PSA level was significantly associated with BCR after eSRT (hazard ratio: 4.89; 95% CI, 1.40-22.9; p < 0.0001). When patients were stratified according to the number of risk factors at final pathology, patients with at least two pathologic risk factors showed an increased risk of 5-yr BCR as high as 10% per 0.1 ng/ml of PSA level compared with only 1.5% in patients with one or no pathologic risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, cancer control after eSRT greatly depended on pretreatment PSA. The absolute PSA level had a different prognostic value depending on the pathologic characteristics of the tumour. In patients with more adverse pathologic features, eSRT conferred better cancer control when administered at the very first sign of PSA rise. Conversely, the benefit of eSRT was less evident in men with favourable disease at RP.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this retrospective study, cancer control after early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT) was influenced by pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. This effect was highest in men with at least two of the following pathologic features: pT3b/pT4 disease, pathologic Gleason score ≥ 8, and negative surgical margins. In these patients, eSRT conferred better cancer control when administered at the very first sign of PSA rise.

Diagnostic evaluation of PSA recurrence and review of hormonal management after radical prostatectomy

The aim of this review is to provide a discussion of the diagnostic evaluation of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) and an overview of the postoperative hormonal treatment (HT) options. As no randomized trials in the clinical setting of postoperative prostate-specific antigen recurrence have been reported, there is no conclusive evidence that HT after RP will prolong survival or reduce morbidity. Non-traditional approaches, such as intermittent androgen deprivation, non-steroidal anti-androgens and combination of finasteride and non-steroidal anti-androgen, are investigated and may be acceptable options. Combinations of HT with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent prostate cancer are under study.

Prospective assessment of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of salvage radiotherapy for patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse or local recurrence after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity of salvage radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 75 patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse or clinically isolated local recurrence after radical prostatectomy were accrued between 1998 and 2002 for a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of salvage RT plus 2-year androgen suppression. Acute and late GI and GU toxicity was prospectively assessed using the National Cancer Institute Expanded Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2. For acute toxicity, prevalence was examined. For late toxicity, cumulative incidences of Grade 2 or higher and Grade 3 toxicity were calculated.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 years at the time of salvage RT. Median time from radical prostatectomy to RT was 36.2 months. Median follow-up was 45.1 months. Seventy-five patients were available for acute toxicity analysis, and 72 for late toxicity. Twelve percent and 40% had preexisting GI and GU dysfunction before RT, respectively. Sixty-eight percent, 21%, and 5% experienced Grade 1, 2, and 3 acute GI or GU toxicity, respectively. Cumulative incidences of Grade 2 or higher late GI and GU toxicity at 36 months were 8.7% and 22.6%, and Grade 3 late GI and GU toxicity, 1.6% and 2.8%, respectively. None had Grade 4 late toxicity. The severity of acute GU toxicity (Grade < 2 vs. >/= 2) was a significant predictor factor for Grade 2 or higher late GU toxicity after adjusting for preexisting GU dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Salvage RT generally was well tolerated. Grade 3 or higher late GI or GU toxicity was uncommon.

Health-related quality of life after adjuvant and salvage postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer - a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze health-related quality of life changes after postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 101 patients has been surveyed prospectively before (time A), at the last day (B), two months after (C) and >1 year after (D) RT using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) with urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains. The prostatic fossa was treated with a four-field box technique up to a total dose of 66.6 Gy.

RESULTS

While median urinary scores reached baseline levels already two months after radiotherapy (function/bother scores at time A-B-C-D: 94/89-89/75-94/89-94/89; A vs. B: p<0.01), bowel problems needed a longer time to recover (function/bother scores at time A-B-C-D: 96/100-85/89-88/93-96/100; A vs. B/C: p<0.01). Greater bladder volumes inside specific isodoses were associated with temporary significantly lower urinary bother scores and chronically lower urinary incontinence scores. Only 7% of patients reported of erections firm enough for intercourse before RT, so that RT-associated sexual toxicity played a minor role.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to bowel symptoms, acute urinary problems recover very soon after the end of postoperative RT. After >1 year, only minor HRQOL changes occurred in comparison to baseline scores.

Quality of life for men receiving a second treatment for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed the impact of second treatment on health related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. This issue is important because second treatment resulting from prostate specific antigen recurrence has the potential to further negatively impact health related quality of life and affect the overall value of treatment. We compared differences in health related quality of life before and after second treatment for men who had asymptomatic prostate specific antigen recurrence with those who did not have biochemical failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men in this analysis (897) had localized disease, initially underwent radical prostatectomy monotherapy, and completed at least 1 health related quality of life questionnaire before and after radical prostatectomy. In this cohort 175 men underwent second treatment (nonadjuvant). The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index were used to measure health related quality of life. Associations between patient groups and time on health related quality of life were analyzed using repeated measures.

RESULTS

Men who received a second treatment presented with more severe disease before radical prostatectomy and had worse general health related quality of life. Although health related quality of life differed significantly with time for the 2 groups, most domains for the second treatment group improved or remained stable until 15 months before second treatment, at which point they declined. Scores in the sexual functioning and role-physical domains showed clinically and statistically significant patterns of decreasing with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Health related quality of life is affected following second treatment but starts to decline approximately 1 year before second treatment. Not all aspects of health related quality of life decreased at the same rate, so patients should be counseled that certain domains may be affected more by additional treatment.

Prospective evaluation of quality of life in prostate cancer patients receiving combined treatment of postoperative radiotherapy plus androgen suppression for PT3 or positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) plus 2-yr androgen suppression (AS) on quality of life (QOL) in patients with pathologic T3 or positive resection margins after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients underwent postoperative RT followed by 2-yr AS, in a phase 2 study, between 1998 and 2002. Median age was 61 yr at the time of RP. QOL was prospectively assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire 30-item version 3.0 with the added prostate cancer-specific module at baseline and predefined follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Patients experienced a significant increase in bowel dysfunction score (22%) by the end of RT, which would be considered a major change in QOL. This bowel dysfunction resolved after RT and showed no difference from baseline in the subsequent 2-yr AS period. A similar, but less pronounced, pattern of change occurred for the diarrhea domain. Urinary dysfunction score also increased at the end of RT by 6.6%, considered a clinically minor change in QOL. It then returned to baseline in the post-RT period. The cohort had poor erectile function at baseline; thus, it was difficult to assess any further decline in this domain brought on by RT or AS. In the remaining QOL domains, a change of minor or moderate clinical significance was observed at occasional time points for global health status, fatigue, pain, and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT plus 2-yr AS after RP did not result in any major, persistent, adverse effect on QOL.

Strahlentherapie beim Lokalrezidiv des Prostatakarzinoms

Approximately 25% of patients experience recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Most frequently, the only evidence of a relapse is a rising PSA level without clinical evidence. Without further treatment the natural history of PSA progression results in local recurrence or distant metastasis of prostate cancer. Since a proportion of these biochemical failures relate to a local recurrence, radiotherapy offers a potential curative approach. Up to now, no randomized studies are available. Therefore any decision can only be based on prospective observation studies or retrospective data. The data available indicate that optimal results can be obtained in patients with PSA levels below 1-2 ng/ml or even lower, a documented R1 resection, and a PSA doubling time>10 months. Doses of 64-66 Gy seem to be required for adequate control. Side effects are generally well acceptable and importantly no adverse effects on urinary continence have been documented. Taken together, radiotherapy is the only treatment option with curative potential in situations where a local failure is highly likely.