Planning the breast tumor bed boost: changes in the excision cavity volume and surgical scar location after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation

Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer

Research in the field of local and locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy aims to maintain excellent oncological outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) considers variations in target and organs at risk (OARs) anatomy occurring during the treatment course and integrates these in re-optimized treatment plans. Exploiting ART routinely in clinic may result in smaller target volumes and better OAR sparing, which may lead to reduction of acute as well as late toxicities. In this review MR-guided and CT-guided ART for breast cancer patients according to different clinical scenarios (neoadjuvant and adjuvant partial breast irradiation, whole breast, chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) are reviewed and their advantages as well as challenging aspects discussed.

Robustness of Breast Margins with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy without a Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Couch: A Dosimetric Evaluation

In our hospital, a TrueBeam linear accelerator and the PerfectPitch 6-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) couch (Varian), with 7 mm margins, are used for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of breast cancer (BC). This study tested whether a 3-degrees-of-freedom (3-DOF) couch, i.e., without rotation compensation (such as the Halcyon couch), affected dose metrics. A total of 446 daily extended cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 20 patients who received VMAT for BC were used to recalculate the treatment plans with the session registration (6-DOF) and a simulated matching with 3-DOF. The initial plan provided significantly better coverage for internal mammary chain and clavicular lymph node clinical target volumes (CTVs) than the 6-DOF and 3-DOF CBCT plans. The volumes receiving 110% of the prescribed dose (V110%) were increased for all CTVs with the 6-DOF and 3-DOF CBCT plans, but the difference was significant only for the breast/chest wall CTV (p < 0.05; paired samples t-test). Protection of the heart and lungs was comparable among plans. The dose volume histograms based on the 6-DOF and 3-DOF data were similar for CTVs and organs at risk. Therefore, with a 7 mm margin, VMAT and a 3-DOF couch can be used for BC treatment without any compromise in delivery accuracy.

Feasibility study of defining planning target volume using surgical margins in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study investigates the feasibility and potential impacts of utilizing a Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (GEC ESTRO) recommended surgical margin-based planning margin in permanent breast seed implant (PBSI) brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-nine patients were included in this retrospective study. Three margin selections were used for PTV construction: (1) 1.25 or 1.5 cm isotropic margin (PTV_PBSI), (2) 2 cm minus surgical margin in each direction as recommended by GEC ESTRO (PTV_aniso), and (3) 2 cm minus minimum surgical margin isotropically (PTV_iso). PTV volume and dose coverage using clinical PBSI plans were compared across three groups. New PBSI plans were constructed on PTV_aniso for 20 patients and planning parameters were compared to original plans constructed on PTV_PBSI.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had surgical margins in six directions reported, with a median value of 8 mm anteriorly, and 10 mm in all other directions. PTV_aniso (36.3 ± 15.0 cc) was overall smaller than PTV_PBSI (55.6 ± 14.3 cc), p value < 0.05. PBSI clinical plans showed satisfactory coverage on PTV_aniso, with a median (range) V100 of 97.9% (85.8%-100.0%). Comparing to original treatment plans, new plans constructed on PTV_aniso reduced the number of implant seeds and skin dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical PBSI plans provide satisfactory coverage of GEC ESTRO recommended PTVs. In this patient cohort, GEC ESTRO planning margin resulted in smaller target volumes, and therefore, new plans constructed on PTV_aniso required fewer implanted seeds and lower skin doses were achieved. However, given PBSI delivery uncertainties, further investigations are required to determine if the GEC ESTRO planning margin will be sufficiently robust.

Tattoo-Free Setup for Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Regional Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with either 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) planning or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) receive permanent tattoos to assist with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of surface imaging, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo-based setups to those without reference to tattoos.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight patients receiving RNI at our institution from July 2019 to December 2020 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Twenty-four patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface and x-ray imaging. A subsequent 24 patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by x-ray imaging without reference to tattoos. Patient cohorts were balanced by treatment technique and use of deep inspiration breath hold. Treatment (including setup and delivery) time and x-ray-based shifts after surface imaging were recorded.

RESULTS

Among patients in the tattoo group receiving 3DCRT RNI, the average treatment time per fraction was 21.35 versus 19.75 minutes in the 3DCRT RNI no-tattoo cohort (P = .03). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the tattoo cohort were 5.6 versus 4.4 mm in the no-tattoo cohort. The average treatment time per fraction for the tattoo VMAT RNI cohort was 23.16 versus 20.82 minutes in the no-tattoo VMAT RNI cohort (P = .08). Mean 3D vector shifts for the patients in the tattoo VMAT cohort were 5.5 versus 7.1 mm in the no-tattoo VMAT cohort. Breath hold technique and body mass index did not affect accuracy in a consistent or clinically relevant way.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a combination of surface and x-ray imaging, without reference to tattoos, provides excellent accuracy in alignment and setup verification among patients receiving RNI for breast cancer, regardless of treatment technique and with reduced treatment time. Skin-based tattoos are no longer warranted for patients receiving supine RNI.

Intra-Operative Electron Radiation Therapy (IOERT) Anticipated Boost in Breast Cancer Treatment: An Italian Multicenter Experience

In breast cancer, the use of a boost to the tumor bed can improve local control. The aim of this research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the boost with intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI). The present retrospective multicenter large data were collected between January 2011 and March 2018 in 8 Italian Radiation Oncology Departments. Acute and late toxicity, objective (obj) and subjective (subj) cosmetic outcomes, in-field local control (LC), out-field LC, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Overall, 797 patients were enrolled. IOERT-boost was performed in all patients during surgery, followed by WBI. Acute toxicity (≥G2) occurred in 179 patients (22.46%); one patient developed surgical wound infection (G3). No patients reported late toxicity ≥ G2. Obj-cosmetic result was excellent in 45%, good in 35%, fair in 20% and poor in 0% of cases. Subj-cosmetic result was excellent in 10%, good in 20%, fair in 69% and poor in 0.3% of cases. Median follow-up was 57 months (range 12-109 months). At 5 years, in-field LC was 99.2% (95% CI: 98-99.7); out-field LC 98.9% (95% CI: 97.4-99.6); DFS 96.2% (95% CI: 94.2-97.6); OS 98.6% (95% CI: 97.2-99.3). In conclusion, IOERT-boost appears to be safe, providing excellent local control for early-stage breast cancer. The safety and long-term efficacy&nbsp;should encourage use of this treatment, with the potential to reduce local recurrence.

Maintaining Contour with a Three-dimensional Interstitial Tissue Marker in 134 Lumpectomies

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is meant to preserve the natural appearance of the breast; however, tissue volume deficits cannot always be compensated by soft tissue mobilization. A three-dimensional (3D) interstitial tissue marker (BioZorb) was designed to delineate the lumpectomy cavity for targeting boost irradiation, but an unexpected secondary benefit may be in guiding wound contraction and restoring contour to the lumpectomy bed. We analyze tissue volume excised at the time of lumpectomy as a function of device size selected.

Methods

In total, 134 consecutive lumpectomy patients implanted with BioZorb between May 2015 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for tissue volume excised, device size used, location, and re-operation rates, including explantation of the device.

Results

An estimated 113 patients underwent device implantation at initial lumpectomy, and 21 at margin re-excision. Twenty-seven patients underwent re-excision, while 14 elected mastectomy for positive margins following insertion; 22 had the same device reimplanted. Mean lumpectomy volume was 79.0 cm³ (range 10.3-275.8 cm³) during the first implant procedure. Large-volume lumpectomies, averaging 136.5 cm³, were associated with selection of larger devices, which aided in restoring volume and maintaining breast contour. Three (2.2%) patients requested removal of the device.

Conclusions

BioZorb implantation can be a safe and useful oncoplastic technique for restoring volume with BCS. Large-volume lumpectomies can be performed without contouring defects using the device. An unexpected secondary benefit of the device may be scaffolding for wound contraction.

Partial Breast Irradiation and Surgical Clip Usage for Tumor Bed Delineation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Canada: A Radiation Oncology Perspective

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the usage and perceived benefit of surgical clips for breast radiation therapy planning in Canada, focusing on partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective institutional review identified patients eligible for PBI based on clinicopathologic criteria, and tumor bed visualization was determined from computed tomography-planning scans. An online survey was subsequently distributed to Canadian radiation oncologists addressing the usage and added value of surgical clips for breast radiation therapy planning purposes. The survey also evaluated PBI usage and regimens. Responses were collected over a 4-week period. PBI regimen usage at our institution was also reviewed from May 1 to December 18, 2020.

RESULTS

Based on clinicopathologic criteria, 306 patients were identified between 2013 and 2018 who were eligible for PBI. However, only 24% (72/306) of cases were noted to have surgical clips, of which over 50% did not assist in tumor bed localization due to inconsistent clip positioning. Similarly, nearly two-thirds (28/43) of survey respondents indicated that surgical clips are placed in the tumor bed in less than 50% of cases. Almost all respondents (42/43) indicated that surgical clips facilitate breast radiation therapy planning and favor the development of guidelines to increase the consistent placement of surgical clips in the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery. Approximately two-thirds of respondents (28/43) offer PBI to eligible patients as routine treatment, with moderate hypofractionated regimens most commonly recommended. However, the 1-week daily regimen of 26 Gy in 5 fractions is now offered to the majority (77%) of patients at our institution.

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong agreement among Canadian radiation oncologists that surgical clip placement facilitates breast radiation therapy planning, and most favor the development of surgical guidelines for the consistent placement of surgical clips in this setting. With the growing use of PBI, accurate localization of the tumor bed is extremely important.

IOERT versus external beam electrons for boost radiotherapy in stage I/II breast cancer: 10-year results of a phase III randomized study

Background

Intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) boost could be not inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in terms of local control and tissue tolerance. The aim of the study is to present the long-term follow-up results on local control, esthetic evaluation, and toxicity of a prospective study on early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery with an IOERT boost of 10 Gy (experimental group) versus 5 × 2 Gy EBRT boost (standard arm). Both arms received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with 50 Gy (2 Gy single dose).

Methods

A single-institution phase III randomized study to compare IOERT versus EBRT boost in early-stage breast cancer was conducted as a non-inferiority trial. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of in-breast true recurrences (IBTR) and out-field local recurrences (LR) as well as toxicity and cosmetic results. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and patient’s grade of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes.

Results

Between 1999 and 2004, 245 patients were randomized: 133 for IOERT and 112 for EBRT. The median follow-up was 12 years (range 10–16 years). The cumulative risk of IBTR at 5–10 years was 0.8% and 4.3% after IOERT, compared to 4.2% and 5.3% after EBRT boost (p = 0.709). The cumulative risk of out-field LR at 5–10 years was 4.7% and 7.9% for IOERT versus 5.2% and 10.3% for EBRT (p = 0.762). All of the IOERT arm recurrences were observed at > 100 months’ follow-up, whereas the mean time to recurrence in the EBRT group was earlier (55.2 months) (p < 0.05). No late complications associated with IOERT were observed. The overall cosmetic results were scored as good or excellent in physician and patient evaluations for both IOERT and EBRT. There were significantly better scores for IOERT at all time points in physician and patient evaluations with the greatest difference at the end of EBRT (p = 0.006 objective and p = 0.0004 subjective) and most narrow difference at 12 months after the end of EBRT (p = 0.08 objective and p = 0.04 subjective analysis).

Conclusion

A 10-Gy IOERT boost during breast-conserving surgery provides high local control rates without significant morbidity. Although not significantly superior to external beam boosts, the median time to local recurrences after IOERT is prolonged by more than 4 years.

Comparison of postoperative CT- and preoperative MRI-based breast tumor bed contours in prone position for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

Objectives

To compare the target volume of tumor bed defined by postoperative computed tomography (post-CT) in prone position registered with or without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pre-MRI).

Methods

A total of 22 patients were included with early-stage breast invasive ductal cancer, who have undergone breast-conservative surgery and received the pre-MRI and post-CT in prone position. The MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T2W-SPAIR, DWI, dyn-eTHRIVE, sdyn-eTHRIVE) were delineated and manually registered to CT, respectively. The clinical target volumes (CTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were contoured on CT and different MRI sequences, respectively. Differences were measured in terms of consistence index (CI), dice coefficient (DC), geographical miss index (GMI), and normal tissue index (NTI).

Results

The differences of delineation volumes among CT and MRIs were significant, both in the CTVs (p = 0.035) and PTVs (p < 0.001). The values of CI and DC for sdyn-eTHRIVE registration to CT were the largest among all MRI sequences, but GMI and NTI were the smallest. No obvious linear correlation (p > 0.05) between the CI derived from the registration of CT and sdyn-eTHRIVE of CTV with the breast volume, the cavity visualization score (CVS) of CT, time interval from surgery to CT simulation, the maximum diameter of the intraoperative mass, and the number of titanium clips, respectively.

Conclusions

The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. The pre-MRI, especially the sdyn-eTHRIVE, could be used to optimize the post-CT-based target delineation of breast cancer.

Key Points

• Registered pre-MRI to post-CT in order to improve the accuracy of target volume delineation of breast cancer.

• The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT.

• The sdyn-eTHRIVE of pre-MRIs may be a better choice to improve the delineation of CT-based CTV and PTV.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07085-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adaptive radiation therapy of breast cancer by repeated imaging during irradiation

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among females and also a leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. A multimodality treatment approach may be utilized for optimal management of patients with combinations of surgery, radiation therapy (RT) and systemic treatment. RT composes an integral part of breast conserving treatment, and is typically used after breast conserving surgery to improve local control. Recent years have witnessed significant improvements in the discipline of radiation oncology which allow for more focused and precise treatment delivery. Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is among the most important RT techniques which may be utilized for redesigning of treatment plans to account for dynamic changes in tumor size and anatomy during the course of irradiation. In the context of breast cancer, ART may serve as an excellent tool for patients receiving breast irradiation followed by a sequential boost to the tumor bed. Primary benefits of ART include more precise boost localization and potential for improved normal tissue sparing with adapted boost target volumes particularly in the setting of seroma reduction during the course of irradiation. Herein, we provide a concise review of ART for breast cancer in light of the literature.

Comparing Breast Conservation Surgery Seromas Contoured by Radiation Therapists versus those Contoured by a Radiation Oncologist in Radiation Therapy Planning for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the management of early-stage breast cancer using radiation therapy, computed tomography (CT) simulation is used to identify the breast conservation surgery (BCS) seroma as a proxy for the tumour bed. The delineation or contouring of the seroma is generally a task performed by a radiation oncologist (RO). With increasing patient numbers and other demands placed on ROs, the scope of practice for radiation therapists (RTs) is continually expanding, and the need for skills transfer from one profession to another has been investigated in recent years. This study aims to compare the BCS seroma volumes contoured by RTs with those contoured by ROs to add evidence in support of expanding the RTs' role in the treatment planning process in the management of early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A study was undertaken using the CT-simulation (CT-sim) data sets of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated in 2013. The CT-sim data sets had BCS seromas contoured by 1 of 5 ROs as part of routine clinical management. This study involved 4 RTs who each used the patient information to identify and contour breast seromas on 50 deidentified CT-sim data sets. Metrics used to compare RT versus RO contours included volume size, overlap between volumes, and geographical distance from the centre of volumes.

RESULTS

There were 50 CT-sim data sets with 1 RO contour and 4 RT contours analysed. The contour volumes of the 4 RTs and the ROs were assessed. Although there were 50 CT-sim data sets presented to each RT, analysis was carried out on 45, 43, 46, and 45 CT-sim data sets. There were no comparisons made where contours were not delineated. The contour volumes of the 4 RTs and the ROs were assessed with an interclass correlation coefficient, with a result of excellent reliability (0.975, 95% [0.963, 0.985]). The DICE similarity coefficient was used to compare the overlap of each RT contour with the RO contour; the results were favourable with mean (95% CI) DSCs 0.685, 0.640, 0.678, and 0.681, respectively. Comparing the RT and RO geographical centre of the seroma volumes, good to excellent reliability between the RTs and ROs was demonstrated (95% CI mean RO vs RT distances (mm): 3.75, 4.99, 7.71, and 3.39). There was no statistically significant difference between the distances (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

BCS seromas contoured by RTs compared well with those contoured by an RO. This research has provided further evidence to support RTs in assuming additional contouring responsibilities in radiation therapy planning for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Computed tomography-based virtual simulation versus ultrasound-based clinical setup in electron breast boost radiotherapy: Methodology for CT-based electron virtual simulation

PURPOSE

To compare clinical setup using ultrasound (U/S)-delineated target versus computed tomography (CT) virtual simulation using CT-outlined target in breast electron boost. To describe a methodology for electron virtual simulation and collision testing with the treatment planning system (TPS).

METHODS

The two techniques were compared in a prospective study on 12 patients, who were treated using a clinical setup. Target definition was performed by both U/S and CT imaging. The U/S-based target was made visible on CT images by placing a radio-opaque wire on U/S skin markings. The dose distribution of the clinical setup was reproduced in the TPS using the actual electron patient treatment parameters. A CT-based TPS virtual simulation/dose optimization was compared to the clinical setup technique.

RESULTS

Mean beam aperture was larger by 16.3 cm² (p = 0.011) for U/S compared to CT-outlined target. Target mean depth difference (CT minus U/S) was 0.03 cm (p = 0.875). Target coverage at depth was adequate in all cases with CT-based simulation while under/overcovering the target at depth by more than 5 mm in 2 out of 12 cases with clinical setup. Mean target V_90% was 98.5% (CT-based simulation) and 84.4% (clinical setup). Ipsilateral lung/breast were better spared with CT-based simulation. To date, the methodology for CT virtual simulation was applied on 152 patients and collision was avoided in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based simulation and target delineation allows for improved definition of the en-face electron field with less amount of normal tissue irradiated while including the entire target with an adequate margin and optimal electron energy.

Displacement of Surgical Clips in Patients with Human Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Excision Cavity during Whole Breast Irradiation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the displacement of surgical clips in the excision cavity during whole breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) insertion, and to analyze clinicopathologic factors associated with the displacement of surgical clips.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2016 to 2017, 100 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent BCS with the placement of surgical clips (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, and deep sides) in the tumor bed were included in this study. All patients took first planning computed tomography (CT) scan (CT 1) before whole breast irradiation and second CT scan (CT 2) before boost irradiation. Between two sets of planning CT, the displacement of surgical clips was calculated from the ΔX (lateral-medial), ΔY (anterior-posterior), ΔZ (superior-inferior), and three-dimensional (3D) directions. Patients were divided into two groups according to the breast volume replacement with ADM: group A with ADM and group B without ADM.

RESULTS

The means and 1 standard deviations of 3D displacement for superior, inferior, medial, lateral and deep clips were 5.2±2.9, 5.2±3.2, 5.6±4.5, 5.6±4.3, and 4.9±4.9 mm in entire cohort (n=100); 5.6±2.6, 6.0±3.5, 6.7±5.8, 6.7±5.7, and 6.1±7.4 mm in group A (n=38); 4.9±3.1, 4.8±3.0, 5.0±3.5, 5.0±2.9, and 4.3±2.8 mm in group B (n=62), respectively. The 3D displacements of group A were longer than those of group B, but only significant difference was observed in lateral clip (p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated displacement of surgical clips during whole breast irradiation in patients with ADM insertion. For patients who had breast volume replacement using ADM, adaptive boost planning should be considered.

Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study

Purpose

Patients undergoing external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) receive permanent tattoos to aid with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of three‐dimensional (3D) body surface imaging and two‐dimensional (2D) x‐ray imaging‐based matching to surgical clips, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo‐based setups to a patient setup without tattoos.

Materials/methods

Twenty consecutive patients receiving APBI at our institution from July 10, 2017 to February 13, 2018 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Ten patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface imaging and 2D matching of surgical clips. The other ten patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by 2D matching without reference to tattoos. Overall setup time and orthogonal x‐ray‐based shifts after surface imaging per fraction were recorded. Shift data were used to calculate systematic and random error.

Results

Among ten patients in the “no tattoo” group, the average setup time per fraction was 6.83 min vs 8.03 min in the tattoo cohort (P < 0.01). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the “no tattoo” group were 4.6 vs 5.9 mm in the “tattoo” cohort (P = NS). Mean systematic errors in the “no tattoo” group were: 1.2 mm (1.5 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.5 mm (1.6 mm SD) right/left, and 2.3 mm (1.9 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. Mean systematic errors in the “tattoo” group were: 0.8 mm (2.2 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.3 mm (2.5 mm SD) right/left, and 1.4 mm (4.4 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. The random errors in the “no tattoo” group ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mm vs 1.2 to 1.7 mm in the “tattoo” group.

Conclusions

Using both surface imaging and 2D matching to surgical clips provides excellent accuracy in APBI patient alignment and setup verification with reduced setup time relative to the tattoo cohort. Skin‐based tattoos may no longer be warranted for patients receiving external beam APBI.

The Effect of Lumpectomy Cavity Changes on Planning Dose in Breast Radiotherapy Boost

INTRODUCTION

The addition of a postoperative tumour bed (cavity) boost after whole-breast radiotherapy (RT) is known to decrease the risk of local in-breast recurrence. The purpose of this retrospective study is to assess breast excision cavity changes and planned doses at the time of initial boost RT treatments after the completion of whole-breast RT.

METHODS

Over a 4-month period, women with highly visible cavity on computed tomography (CT) and treated with whole-breast RT followed by a conformal photon boost to the tumour bed were identified. The patient's day 1 boost online cone beam CT (CBCT) and corresponding setup corrections were overlaid with the planning CT image. The cavity and dose evaluation volumes (DEVs = 1 cm expansion of the cavity, excluding 5 mm of lung and skin) were assessed. Dosimetric evaluations were performed for maximum and minimum cavity doses, cavity volume receiving 90% (V90) and 95% (V95) of prescription dose, and DEV receiving 85% (V85), 95%, and 105% (V105) of the prescription dose. The two-tailed student t-test and Pearson's correlation test were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in the analysis. The CT cavity (CAV_CT) volume (mean: 28.8 cc, SD 27.9) was larger than the CBCT cavity (CAV_CBCT) volume (mean: 21.1 cc, SD: 22.4) (P value= .003). The CT DEV similarly decreased at the time of boost; DEV_CT (mean: 113.9 cc, SD: 63.2) versus DEV_CBCT (mean: 92.3 cc, SD: 50.8), (P = .002). A strong correlation was observed between the initial CT cavity volume and cavity shrinkage observed at time of boost (day 1 CBCT) (Pearson's r = 0.697; r²= 0.486, P = .001). Both time periods from surgery to CT (median: 92 days, range: 31-227) and from surgery to day 1 CBCT (median: 141 days, range: 56-265) were not associated with cavity volume change. However, an inverse correlation was observed between time from initial CT to day 1 boost CBCT (median: 33 days, range: 24-54) and % cavity volume change (Pearson's r = -0.642; r²= 0.4121, P = .004). Dosimetric evaluations of the cavity and DEV showed no significant differences in maximum, minimum, and target dose coverage between the CT and boost volumes.

CONCLUSION

In patients with breast cancer treated with a tumour bed boost after whole-breast RT, the postoperative cavity can shrink between the time of CT and day 1 boost. The extent of cavity reduction was greatest in patients with large postoperative cavities on initial CT. Despite the cavity size change, conformal boost fields provide adequate dose coverage to the cavity.

Intra- and inter-observer variability in breast tumour bed contouring and the controversial role of surgical clips

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the visualization of surgical clips (SCs) on the same set of planning computed tomography (CT) of breast cancer (BC) patients influences agreement on tumour bed (TB) delineation. Planning CT (CT_orig) of 47 BC patients with SCs to visualize the TB was processed in order to blur SCs and create a virtual CT (CT_mod). Four radiation oncologists (ROs, 2 juniors and 2 seniors) contoured TB on both the CT sets. Centre of mass distance (CMD), percentage overlap as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface distance as average Hausdorff distance (AHD) and TB volume size were analysed. The intra-observer variability when contouring TB with and without SCs was statistically significant (p-values = 0.016, 0.0002 and ≪ 0.001 for CMD, AHD and DSC, respectively). Junior ROs showed worse reproducibility compared to seniors. The median DSC was < 0.7. The inter-observer variability with and without SCs was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all metrics, with an increase of 48.7% in DSC and decrease of 50.7% and 57.1% in CMD and AHD, respectively, as relative median values, when SCs were visible. Regarding TB volumes, when SCs were visible, the intra-observer analysis revealed that 3/4 ROs delineated larger volumes, especially juniors. The inter-observer analysis showed that, in presence of visible SCs, the difference in TB volume among all the ROs fell from statistically significant to borderline significance (p = 0.052). TB contouring is confirmed to be an observer-dependent task. SCs decreased the intra and inter-observer variability but the overall agreement between ROs remained low.

Interobserver variability (between radiation oncologist and radiation therapist) in tumor bed contouring after breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

To examine interobserver variability between the radiation oncologist (RTO) and the radiation therapist (RTT) in delineating the tumor bed (TB) in early breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a radiotherapy boost to the TB. In a first group, the clinical target volume (CTV) for the boost was the surgical bed, defined by using surgical clips. In a second group, the CTV was defined by identifying a seroma cavity or a metallic find on the scar. These contours were compared in terms of volume, number of slices, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

RESULTS

Forty patients were assessed: 20 had surgical clips (group 1) while the other 20 had none (group 2). There was no difference in the number of slices contoured by the 2 operators for group 1, but a statistically significant difference emerged in the volumes: the RTT identified a TB that was a mean 45% smaller than the one identified by the RTO. Random differences were found between the 2 operators for group 2. The TBs delineated for this group were significantly larger (P<0.05) than those identified by the RTT for group 1. The mean Dice value between the RTO's and the RTT's TBs was 0.69±0.07 (range 0.53-0.81) for group 1 and 0.37±0.18 (range 0-0.58) for group 2 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the use of clips coincided with less interoperator variability. With appropriate training, the RTT may play an important part in the multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.

Hypofractionation with concomitant boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer in Mexico

Aim

To evaluate whether hypofractionation with integrated boost to the tumour bed using intensity-modulated radiation therapy is an acceptable option and to determine whether this treatment compromises local control, toxicity and cosmesis.

Background

Retrospective studies have demonstrated that patients who are treated with HF and integrated boost experience adequate local control, a dosimetric benefit, decreased toxicity and acceptable cosmesis compared with conventional fractionation.

Materials and methods

A retrospective, observational and longitudinal study was conducted from January 2008 to June 2015 and included 34 patients with breast cancer (stage 0-II) who were undergoing conservative surgery.The prescribed doses were 45 Gy in 20 fractions (2.25 Gy/fraction) to the breast and 56 Gy in 20 fractions (2.8 Gy/fraction) to the tumour bed.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included. The mean follow-up was 49.29 months, and the mean age was 52 years. The mean percentage of PTV from the mammary region that received 100% of the prescribed dose was 97.89% (range 95-100), and the mean PTV percentage of the tumour bed that received 100% of the dose was 98% (95-100).The local control and the overall survival were 100%, and the cosmesis was good in 82% of the patients. Grade 1 acute toxicity was present in 16 patients (47%), and grade 1 chronic toxicity occurred in 6 cases (18%).

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate that hypofractionation with integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy is an acceptable option that provides excellent local control and low toxicity.

Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with clinically evident seroma at the time of planning CT simulation for WBI were included. Two RT treatment plannings were generated for each patient based on the initial CT simulation and tumor bed boost CT simulation to assess seroma and boost target volume (BTV) changes during WBI. Also, dosimetric impact of ART was analyzed by comparative evaluation of critical organ doses in both RT treatment plannings.

RESULTS

Median time interval between the two CT simulations was 35 days. Statistically significant reduction was detected in seroma volume and BTV during the conventionally fractionated WBI course along with statistically significant reduction in critical organ doses with ART (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest significant benefit of ART by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated CT simulation after WBI for patients with clinically evident seroma.

Investigation of electron boost radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer: Is a direct electron field optimal?

PURPOSE

Historically, electron boost dose mainly was delivered by a direct field in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer. In this prospective study, we investigated direct electron field, in terms of optimal coverage of tumour bed volume following localization using ultrasound and surgical clips.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First, for all 24 patients, a breast sonographer drew perimeter of tumour bed on the breast skin. Then an electron boost field was outlined on the demarcated territory, and a lead wire marker compatible with CT scan was placed on the field borders by a 2cm margin. After CT scan simulation, all patients underwent adjuvant whole breast irradiation with 3D-conformal radiotherapy to 50Gy in 25 fractions. Then for boost radiotherapy, lead wire in CT images was countoured as electron boost field. Also, the tumour bed was contoured based on surgical clips (true clinical target volume and true planning target volume). Electron treatment planning was done for electron boost field. Finally isodose coverages for true planning target volume investigated.

RESULTS

On average, 16.68% of clips planning target volume (true planning target volume; range: 0.00 to 95%) received 90% oor more of the prescribed dose when the electron treatment plan was made. Isodose curves does not provide adequate coverage on the tumour bed (clips planning target volume) when electron boost treatment planning was generated for electron boost field (en face electron field). In fact, a part of target (planning target volume-c) is missed and more doses is absorbed in normal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Electron boost treatment planning (an en face electron field) following tumour bed localization using ultrasonography does not provide an optimized coverage of tumour bed volume.

Displacement of Surgical Clips during Postoperative Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE

Surgical clips are used as a target for postoperative breast radiotherapy, and displacement of surgical clips would result in inaccurate delivery of radiation. We investigated the displacement range of surgical clips in the breast during postoperative radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

A total of 178 patients who received breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiation of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions to the involved breast for 6.5 weeks were included. Surgical clips were used to mark the lumpectomy cavity during breast-conserving surgery. Patients undertook planning computed tomography (CT) scan for whole breast irradiation. Five weeks after beginning radiation, when the irradiation dose was 45 Gy, planning CT scan was performed again for a boost radiotherapy plan in all patients. The surgical clips were defined in both CT images and compared in lateromedial (X), anteroposterior (Y), superoinferior (Z), and three-dimensional directions.

RESULTS

The 90th percentile of displacement of surgical clips was 5.31 mm (range, 0.0-22.2 mm) in the lateromedial direction, 7.1 mm (range, 0.0-14.2 mm) in the anteroposterior direction, and 6.0 mm (range, 0.0-10.0 mm) in the superoinferior direction. The 90th percentile of three-dimensional displacement distance was 9.8 mm (range, 0.0-28.2 mm). On the multivariate analysis, seroma ≥15 mL was the only independent factor associated with the displacement of surgical clips. In patients with seroma ≥15 mL, the 90th percentile of displacement of surgical clips was 15.1 mm in the lateromedial direction, 12.7 mm in the anteroposterior direction, 10.0 mm in the superoinferior direction, and 21.8 mm in the three-dimensional distance.

CONCLUSION

A target volume expansion of 10 mm from surgical clips may be sufficient to compensate for the displacement of clips during postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. For patients who had a seroma, a replanning CT scan for a boost radiation should be considered to ensure exact postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Comparison of two radiation techniques for the breast boost in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

After breast conservative surgery (BCS) and whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT), the use of boost irradiation is recommended especially in patients at high risk. However, the standard technique and the definition of the boost volume have not been well defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared an anticipated pre-operative photon boost on the tumour, administered with low-dose fractionated radiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two different sequential boost techniques, administered after BCS and standard adjuvant WBRT: (1) a standard photon beam (2) and an electron beam technique on the tumour bed of the same patients. The plans were analyzed for the dosimetric coverage of the CT-delineated irradiated volume. The minimal dose received by 95% of the target volume (D95), the minimal dose received by 90% of the target volume (D90) and geographic misses were evaluated.

RESULTS

15 patients were evaluated. The sequential photon and electron boost techniques resulted in inferior target volume coverage compared with the anticipated boost technique, with a median D95 of 96.3% (range 94.7-99.6%) and 0.8% (range 0-30%) and a median D90 of 99.1% (range 90.2-100%) and 54.7% (range 0-84.8%), respectively. We observed a geographic miss in 26.6% of sequential electron plans. The results of the anticipated boost technique were better: 99.4% (range 96.5-100%) and 97.1% (range 86.2-99%) for median D90 and median D95, respectively, and no geographic miss was observed. We observed a dose reduction to the heart, with left-sided breast irradiation, using the anticipated pre-operative boost technique, when analyzed for all dose-volume parameters. When compared with the sequential electron plans, the pre-operative photon technique showed a higher median ipsilateral lung Dmax.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that an anticipated pre-operative photon boost results in a better coverage with respect to the standard sequential boost while also saving the organs at risk and consequently fewer side effects.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first dosimetric study that evaluated the association between an anticipated boost and neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (II): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving open cavity surgery

OBJECTIVE

To prepare guidelines for target definition and delineations after open cavity breast conserving surgery in accelerated partial breast irradiations or boost treatments using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy based on the consensus of the Breast Working Group of GEC-ESTRO.

METHOD

Following a study on interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery and a number of discussions in consensus meetings these guidelines were worked out by experts on the field.

PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Consistent windowing has to be used for proper cavity visualization. (2) The cavity visualization score has to be at least 3 in order to minimize the interobserver variations of target definition. (3) At delineation of surgical cavity only the homogeneous part of the postoperative seroma has to be included in the contours and protrusions or sharp irregularities have to be excluded. When surgical clips are present, they have to be surrounded by the contour with close contact. (4) CTV is created from the outlined surgical cavity with a nonisotropic geometrical extension. In each direction the safety margin is calculated by taking into account the size of the free resection margin. The total size of safety margin is always 20mm which is the sum of the surgical and added safety margins. CTV is limited to chest wall/pectoral muscles and 5mm below the skin surface.

CONCLUSION

Following these guidelines the target volume definition in breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery is expected to be accomplished in more consistent way with low interobserver variations.

A clip-based protocol for breast boost radiotherapy provides clear target visualisation and demonstrates significant volume reduction over time

Introduction

The clinical target volume (CTV) for early stage breast cancer is difficult to clearly identify on planning computed tomography (CT) scans. Surgical clips inserted around the tumour bed should help to identify the CTV, particularly if the seroma has been reabsorbed, and enable tracking of CTV changes over time.

Methods

A surgical clip-based CTV delineation protocol was introduced. CTV visibility and its post-operative shrinkage pattern were assessed. The subjects were 27 early stage breast cancer patients receiving post-operative radiotherapy alone and 15 receiving post-operative chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. The radiotherapy alone (RT/alone) group received a CT scan at median 25 days post-operatively (CT1rt) and another at 40 Gy, median 68 days (CT2rt). The chemotherapy/RT group (chemo/RT) received a CT scan at median 18 days post-operatively (CT1ch), a planning CT scan at median 126 days (CT2ch), and another at 40 Gy (CT3ch).

Results

There was no significant difference (P = 0.08) between the initial mean CTV for each cohort. The RT/alone cohort showed significant CTV volume reduction of 38.4% (P = 0.01) at 40 Gy. The Chemo/RT cohort had significantly reduced volumes between CT1ch: median 54 cm³ (4–118) and CT2ch: median 16 cm³, (2–99), (P = 0.01), but no significant volume reduction thereafter.

Conclusion

Surgical clips enable localisation of the post-surgical seroma for radiotherapy targeting. Most seroma shrinkage occurs early, enabling CT treatment planning to take place at 7 weeks, which is within the 9 weeks recommended to limit disease recurrence.

Partial–breast irradiation: towards a replacement for whole–breast irradiation?

Largely thanks to all of the investigators and patients who have participated in randomized breast-conservation trials, many women facing a diagnosis of breast cancer today can conserve their breast with the help of adjuvant radiation therapy. A standard course of radiation consists of 5-7 weeks of daily radiation treatments delivered to the whole breast. The success of this treatment has led investigators to attempt to determine whether the same control can be achieved while decreasing the volume of breast tissue irradiated, thus allowing treatment to be delivered in a shorter period of time. This approach could alleviate time and logistical problems faced by patients during their course of treatment as well as improving overall cost-effectiveness. It can also allow complete avoidance of the adjacent heart and lung tissue in the radiation treatment portal. Partial-breast irradiation (the delivery of radiation to the resection cavity, plus a safety margin) delivered in just hours or days, is currently under investigation. Although relatively new, its use is growing rapidly and many institutional and cooperative group trials are quickly enlisting patients, while physicians are gaining experience in a variety of partial-breast irradiation techniques.

Tumor bed volumetric changes during breast irradiation for the patients with breast cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in breast tumor bed volume during whole breast irradiation (WBI).

Materials and Methods

From September 2011 to November 2012, thirty patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by WBI using computed tomography (CT) simulation were enrolled. Simulation CT scans were performed before WBI (CT1) and five weeks after the breast irradiation (CT2). The tumor bed was contoured based on surgical clips, seroma, and postoperative change. We retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with tumor bed volumetric change.

Results

The median tumor bed volume on CT1 and CT2 was 29.72 and 28.6 mL, respectively. The tumor bed volume increased in 9 of 30 patients (30%) and decreased in 21 of 30 patients (70%). The median percent change in tumor bed volume between initial and boost CT was -5%. Seroma status (p = 0.010) was a significant factor in tumor bed volume reduction of 5% or greater. However, patient age, body mass index, palpability, T stage, axillary lymph node dissection, and tumor location were not significant factors for tumor bed volumetric change.

Conclusion

In this study, volumetric change of tumor bed cavity was frequent. Patients with seroma after BCS had a significant volume reduction of 5% or greater in tumor bed during breast irradiation. Thus, resimulation using CT is indicated for exquisite boost treatment in breast cancer patients with seroma after surgery.

Tumour bed clip localisation for targeted breast radiotherapy: compliance is proportional to trial-related research activity: tumour bed clip localisation in breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer, with the increasing use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the need for accurate tumour bed localisation is paramount. We determined current practice of clip usage in patients referred to a regional centre for radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery. We also investigated whether participation of surgical units in IMRT trials, where tumour bed clip use is emphasised, was associated with clip insertion.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive CT planning images (n = 205), of breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery. Presence and number of clips; referring hospital and referring surgeon of the patient was recorded. This was correlated to previous participation of referring hospital to IMRT trials.

RESULTS

Of 196 eligible patients, 126 (64%) had clips sited, of which 15 (12%) had two or fewer clips. Five referring hospitals were high recruiters (≥14 patients), and five hospitals were low/non-recruiters (≤1 patient) to IMRT trials. Of patients from low/non-recruiting centres, 29 of 43 (67%) had clips omitted, compared to 41 of 153 (27%) from high-recruiting centres (p < 0.001). Median number of clips used in centres recruiting high numbers of patients was four, compared to zero in low recruiting centres. Ten of 31 referring surgeons routinely omitted clips.

CONCLUSION

Despite inclusion in national guidelines, clip insertion has not become routine in the UK in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. However, hospitals involved in breast radiotherapy randomised controlled trials are more compliant with clip usage recommendations. Auditing of clip insertion should be considered as a quality control marker in breast surgery.

Tracking the dynamic seroma cavity using fiducial markers in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation using 3D conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to perform an analysis of the changes in the dynamic seroma cavity based on fiducial markers in early stage breast cancer patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

METHODS

A prospective, single arm trial was designed to investigate the utility of gold fiducial markers in image guided APBI using 3D-CRT. At the time of lumpectomy, four to six suture-type gold fiducial markers were sutured to the walls of the cavity. Patients were treated with a fractionation scheme consisting of 15 fractions with a fractional dose of 333 cGy. Treatment design and planning followed NSABP∕RTOG B-39 guidelines. During radiation treatment, daily kV imaging was performed and the markers were localized and tracked. The change in distance between fiducial markers was analyzed based on the planning CT and daily kV images.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were simulated at an average of 28 days after surgery, and started the treatment on an average of 39 days after surgery. The average intermarker distance (AiMD) between fiducial markers was strongly correlated to seroma volume. The average reduction in AiMD was 19.1% (range 0.0%-41.4%) and 10.8% (range 0.0%-35.6%) for all the patients between simulation and completion of radiotherapy, and between simulation and beginning of radiotherapy, respectively. The change of AiMD fits an exponential function with a half-life of seroma shrinkage. The average half-life for seroma shrinkage was 15 days. After accounting for the reduction which started to occur after surgery through CT simulation and treatment, radiation was found to have minimal impact on the distance change over the treatment course.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the marker distance change as a surrogate for seroma volume, it appears that the seroma cavity experiences an exponential reduction in size. The change in seroma size has implications in the size of the CTV, PTV, and percent of normal breast tissue irradiated when using 3D-CRT.

Cone-beam computed tomography image guided therapy to evaluate lumpectomy cavity variation before and during breast radiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of change (RoC) in the size of the lumpectomy cavity (LC) before and during breast radiotherapy (RT) using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT), relative to the initial LC volume at CT simulation (CTVLC) and timing from surgery. A prospective institutional review board‐approved study included 26 patients undergoing breast RT: 20 whole breast irradiation (WBI) patients and six partial breast irradiation (PBI) patients, with surgical clips outlining the LC. The patients underwent CT simulation (CTsim) followed by five CBCTs during RT, once daily for PBI and once weekly for WBI. The distance between surgical clips and their centroid (D) acted as a surrogate for LC size. The RoC of the LC size, defined as the percentage change of D between two scans divided by the time interval in days between the scans, was calculated before (CTsim to CBCT1) and during RT (CBCT1 to CBCT5). The mean RoC of D for all patients before starting RT was −0.25%/day (range, −1.3 to 1.4) and for WBI patients during RT was −0.15%/day (range, −0.45 to 0.40). Stratified by median CTVLC, the RoC before RT for large CTVLC group (≥25.7cc) was 15 times higher (−0.47%/day) than for small CTVLC group (<25.7 cc) (−0.03%/day), p=0.06. For patients undergoing CTsim< 42 days from surgery, the RoC before RT was −0.43%/day compared to −0.07%/day for patients undergoing CTsim≥42 days from surgery, p=0.12. For breast cancer RT, the rate of change of the LC is affected by the initial cavity size and the timing from surgery. Resimulation closer to the time of boost treatment should be considered in patients who are initially simulated within six weeks of surgery and/or with large CTVLC.

PACS number: 87.55.de

Impact of interfraction seroma collection on breast brachytherapy dosimetry - a mathematical model

Purpose

Balloon brachytherapy is a widely accepted modality for delivery of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Our hypothesis was that inter-fraction seroma collection around the balloon surface would have an adverse effect on dosimetry of the target.

Material and methods

This is a dosimetric re-planning study using two volumetric models (30 cc and 45 cc) in a Contura^® multi-lumen balloon (MLB) catheter. In a previously treated patient, two customized baseline plans were generated using multiple channels of the Contura^® catheter prescribed to the Planning Target Volume Evaluation (PTV_Eval). Symmetric expansions of 1.0 mm (0-9 mm) increments around the balloon surface were performed to simulate a “Virtual Seroma” (VS) accumulation for both balloon volumes and plans were obtained for each expansion using Eclipse Brachyvision™. An analysis of these plans was then performed to evaluate the effect of seroma accumulation on dosimetric parameters of V100 and V90.

Results

20 plans were generated and analyzed (10 plans for each balloon volume), representing VS of 6.0-66.0 cc. There was a commensurate decrease in the dose delivered to the PTV_Eval V100 and V90 (as defined by the original treatment plan) with increasing VS accumulation leading to a sub-optimal coverage of the PTV_Eval. For 30 cc MLB catheter, V100 decreased by 1.4% and V90 decreased by 0.9% for every 1 cc of VS. For 45cc MLB catheter, V100 decreased by 1.3% and V90 decreased by 1.15% for every 1.0 cc accumulation of VS.

Conclusions

Balloon catheter-tissue adherence ensures daily dose delivery to the planned PTV_Eval. Accumulation of seroma, hematoma or air between HDR fractions can significantly impact PTV_Eval dosimetry. Vacuum-port aspiration prior to delivery of each fraction, if available, should be considered to minimize the risk of geographic under dosing.

Simultaneous integrated boost in breast conserving radiotherapy: is replanning necessary following tumor bed change?

Tumor bed (TB) change is often seen during the whole breast irradiation (WBI) in early breast cancer patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate change in seroma volume on repeat CTs and to explore whether replanning is necessary in breast conserving radiotherapy (RT) using the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Thirty patients underwent WBI with 84 CT scans (24 with 3 CTs (CT1, CT2 and CT3) and 6 without CT3) during the 6 weeks of RT were reviewed. TB and other target volumes on all CTs were delineated and compared. IMRT-SIB treatment plans with 50.68 Gy to the whole breast and 64.4 Gy to the boost in 28 fractions were constructed in the CT1. Replan and hybrid plan (without replanning) in the CT2 were reproduced. Dosimetric differences between the replans and hybrid plans were also compared. The mean TB volumes for CT1, CT2 and CT3 were 42.1 cm(3), 20.1 cm(3), 17.0 cm(3), respectively. The mean TB volume reduction was 40.5% from the CT1 to CT2 and 4.3% from the CT2 to CT3. The difference of TB volumes between the CT1 and CT2 was statistically significance (p < 0.001), but not significant between the CT2 and CT3 (p = 1.000). For all patients, target coverage remained adequate with either hybrid plans or replans. However, replanning can significantly decrease the whole breast mean dose (35.2 vs. 35.6 Gy, p = 0.026) and breast volume outside the boost receiving 95% of the boost prescribed dose (39.5 vs. 68.2 cm(3), p < 0.001). In summary, boost volume could irradiate adequately after the significance shrinkage of tumor bed with the fractionated schedule of IMRT-SIB, but replanning on a second CT could avoid the undesired high dose irradiated breast tissue outside boost.

Discrepancies in determining electron energy for lumpectomy boost treatment

The aim of this study was to compare lumpectomy cavity depth measurements obtained through ultrasound (U/S) and retrospective computed tomography (CT). Twenty-five patients with stage T1-2 invasive breast cancer formed the cohort of this study. Their U/S and CT measurements were converted into electron energy and compared. The mean U/S depth was 3.6 ± 1.3 cm, while the mean CT depth was 4.9 ± 1.9 cm; the listed error ranges are one standard deviation. Electron energies for treatment ranged from 6 MeV to 12 MeV based on the U/S determination. There was no significant correlation between cavity depths measured by U/S and CT (R²= 0.459, P < 0.002). Furthermore, only 20% of CT-based electron energy determinations matched the corresponding U/S determinations. This ratio increased to 40% when taking into account an upper limit based on the depth of organs at risk below the cavity. The study shows that there is a significant discrepancy between cavity depths determined by U/S and CT. It also supports the concept that post-lumpectomy radiotherapy boosts should be tailored according to the needs and comfort of individual practices and institutions.

Phase I-II study of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost using volumetric modulated arc therapy for adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer patients: a report of feasibility and early toxicity results in the first 50 treatments

BACKGROUND

To report results in terms of feasibility and early toxicity of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) as adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and May 2011, 50 consecutive patients presenting early-stage breast cancer were submitted to adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB-VMAT approach using RapidArc in our Institution (Istituto Clinico Humanitas ICH). Three out of 50 patients were irradiated bilaterally (53 tumours in 50 patients). All patients were enrolled in a phase I-II trial approved by the ICH ethical committee. All 50 patients enrolled in the study underwent VMAT-SIB technique to irradiate the whole breast with concomitant boost irradiation of the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 40.5 Gy and 48 Gy respectively, delivered in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. Skin toxicities were recorded during and after treatment according to RTOG acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria with a median follow-up of 12 months (range 8-16). Cosmetic outcomes were assessed as excellent/good or fair/poor.

RESULTS

The median age of the population was 68 years (range 36-88). According to AJCC staging system, 38 breast lesions were classified as pT1, and 15 as pT2; 49 cases were assessed as N0 and 4 as N1. The maximum acute skin toxicity by the end of treatment was Grade 0 in 20/50 patients, Grade 1 in 32/50, Grade 2 in 0 and Grade 3 in 1/50 (one of the 3 cases of bilateral breast irradiation). No Grade 4 toxicities were observed. All Grade 1 toxicities had resolved within 3 weeks. No significant differences in cosmetic scores on baseline assessment vs. 3 months and 6 months after the treatment were observed: all patients were scored as excellent/good (50/50) compared with baseline; no fair/poor judgment was recorded. No other toxicities or local failures were recorded during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-week course of postoperative radiation using VMAT with SIB showed to be feasible and was associated with acceptable acute skin toxicity profile. Long-term follow-up data are needed to assess late toxicity and clinical outcomes.

[Organs at risk and target volumes: definition for conformal radiation therapy in breast cancer]

Adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard component of breast cancer treatment. The addition of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery has been shown to reduce local recurrence rate and improve long-term survival. Accurate delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is crucial to the quality of treatment planning and delivered accomplished with innovate technologies in radiation therapy. This allows the radiation beam to be shaped specifically to each individual patient's anatomy. Target volumes include the mammary gland and surgical bed in case of breast conserving surgery, the chest wall in case of mastectomy, and if indicated, regional lymph nodes (axillary, supra- and infraclavicular and internal mammary). Organs at risk include lungs, thyroid, brachial plexus, heart, spinal cord and oesophagus. The aim of this article is to encourage the use of conformal treatment and delineation of target volumes and organs at risk and to describe specifically the definition of these volumes.

Optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry for high dose rate brachytherapy

Purpose: The objective was to determine whether optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) were appropriate for in vivo measurements in high dose rate brachytherapy. In order to make this distinction, three dosimetric characteristics were tested: dose linearity, dose rate dependence, and angular dependence. The Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs were chosen due to their popularity and their availability commercially. Methods: To test the dose linearity, each OSLD was placed at a constant location and the dwell time was varied. Next, in order to test the dose rate dependence, each OSLD was placed at different OLSD-to-source distances and the dwell time was held constant. A curved geometry was created using a circular Accuboost^® applicator in order to test angular dependence. Results: The OSLD response remained linear for high doses and was independent of dose rate. For doses up to 600 cGy, the linear coefficient of determination was 0.9988 with a response of 725 counts per cGy. The angular dependence was significant only in “edge-on” scenarios. Conclusion: OSLDs are conveniently read out using commercially available readers. OSLDs can be re-read and serve as a permanent record for clinical records or be annealed using conventional fluorescent light. Lastly, OSLDs are produced commercially for $5 each. Due to these convenient features, in conjunction with the dosimetric performance, OSLDs should be considered a clinically feasible and attractive tool for in vivo HDR brachytherapy measurements.

Decrease of the lumpectomy cavity volume after whole-breast irradiation affects small field boost planning

To determine whether small field boost (SFB) replanning is necessary when the lumpectomy cavity (LPC) decreases during whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and what parameters might predict a change in the SFB plan. Forty patients had computed tomography (CT) simulation (CT1) within 60 days of surgery and were resimulated (CT2) after 37.8-41.4 Gy for SFB planning. A 3-field photon plan and a single en face electron plan were created on both CTs and compared. In the 26 patients who had a ≥5 cm(3) and a ≥25% decrease in lumpectomy cavity volume (LCV) between CT scans, the SFB plan using photons was different in terms of normal breast tissue volume irradiated (BTV) (p < 0.001), and field dimensions (p < 0.001). In 20/35 patients, the energy or field size changed for electron plans on CT2, but no tested characteristics predicted for a change. Less BTV was irradiated using electrons than photons in 29% (CT1) to 37% (CT2). SFB replanning needs to be individualized to each patient because of the variety of factors that can impact dosimetric planning. Replanning is recommended when using 3-field photons if the patient has experienced a ≥5 cm(3) and a ≥25% decrease in LCV during WBI. Some patients may benefit from electron SFB replanning but no tested characteristics reliably predict those who may benefit the most. The amount of BTV irradiated is less with electrons than in photon plans and this has the potential to improve cosmesis, a clinically important outcome in breast-conserving therapy.

Adaptive radiation therapy for breast IMRT-simultaneously integrated boost: three-year clinical experience

PURPOSE

It has been shown that seroma volumes decrease during breast conserving radiotherapy in a significant percentage of patients. We report on our experience with an adaptive radiation therapy (ART) strategy involving rescanning and replanning patients to take this reduction into account during a course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB).

MATERIALS

From April 2007 till December 2009, 1274 patients eligible for SIB treatment were enrolled into this protocol. Patients for which the time between the initial planning CT (CT(1)) and lumpectomy was less than 30 days and who had an initial seroma volume >30 cm(3) were rescanned at day 10 of treatment (CT(2)) and replanned when significant changes were observed by the radiation oncologist. Patients received 28 fractions of 1.81 Gy to the breast and 2.30 Gy to the boost volume.

RESULTS

Nine percent (n=113) of the 1274 patients enrolled met the criteria and were rescanned. Of this group, 77% (n=87) of treatment plans were adapted. Time between surgery and CT(1) (20 days versus 20 days for adapted and non-adapted plans, p=0.89) and time between CT(1) and CT(2) (21 days versus 22 days for adapted and non-adapted plans, p=0.43) revealed no procedural differences which might have biased our results. In the adapted plans, seroma decreased significantly from 60 to 27 cm(3) (p<0.001), TBV from 70 to 45 cm(3) (p<0.001) and PTV(boost) from 277 to 220 cm(3) (p<0.001). The volume receiving more than 95% of the boost dose (V(95%(total-dose))) could be reduced by 19% (linear fit, R(2)=0.73) from on average 360 to 292 cm(3) (p<0.001). Delay in treatment and the use of a prolonged treatment schedule with different fractionation for patients with seroma could thus be prevented.

CONCLUSION

The adaptive radiation therapy IMRT-SIB procedure has proven to be efficient and effective, leading to a clinically significant reduction of the high dose volume. Seroma present in a subgroup of patients referred for breast radiation therapy does not hamper the introduction of highly conformal IMRT-SIB techniques.

Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines

AIMS

To investigate whether using a pre-operative CT scan (Preop-CT) (1) decreases interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving therapy (BCT), and (2) influences the size of the delineated volumes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty cT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients underwent a CT-scan in radiation treatment position, prior to and after lumpectomy. Five observers delineated a boost-CTV, both with and without access to the Preop-CT. For each patient and for each observer pair, the conformity index (CI) and the distance between the centres of mass (COMd) for both boost volumes were calculated. In addition, all delineated volumes including the standard deviation (SD) with respect to the median delineation were calculated.

RESULTS

Using a Preop-CT reduced the mean COMd of the boost-CTV from 1.1cm to 1.0 cm (p<0.001). No effect was seen on the CI, but the boost-CTV volume reduced from 42 cc to 36 cc (p=0.005), implying a reduction of interobserver variation. We saw no significant change in the SD.

CONCLUSION

Use of a Preop-CT in BCT results in a modest but statistically significant reduction in interobserver variation of the boost-CTV delineations and in a significant reduction in the boost-CTV volume.

Volumetric changes in the lumpectomy cavity during whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the change in the lumpectomy cavity volumes before and after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and to identify factors associated with the change of volume.

Materials and Methods

From September 2009 to April 2010, the computed tomography (CT) simulation data from 70 patients obtained before and after WBRT was evaluated. The lumpectomy cavity volumes were contoured based on surgical clips, seroma, and postoperative changes. Significant differences in the data from pre-WBRT CT and post-WBRT CT were assessed. Multiple variables were examined for correlation with volume reduction in the lumpectomy cavity.

Results

The mean and median volume reduction in the lumpectomy cavity after WBRT were 17.6 cm³ and 16.1 cm³, respectively with the statistical significance (p < 0.001). The volume reduction in the lumpectomy cavity was inversely correlated with time from surgery to radiation therapy (R = 0.390). The presence of seroma was significantly associated with a volumetric change in the lumpectomy cavity after WBRT (p = 0.011).

Conclusion

The volume of lumpectomy cavity reduced significantly after WBRT. As the time from surgery to the start of WBRT increased, the volume reduction in the lumpectomy cavity during WBRT decreased. A strong correlation was observed between the presence of seroma and the reduced volume. To ensure appropriate coverage and to limit normal tissue exposure during boost irradiation in patients who has seroma at the time of starting WBRT, repeating CT simulation at boost planning is suggested.

Image guidance using 3D-ultrasound (3D-US) for daily positioning of lumpectomy cavity for boost irradiation

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of 3D ultrasound (3DUS) breast IGRT for electron and photon lumpectomy site boost treatments.

Materials and methods

20 patients with a prescribed photon or electron boost were enrolled in this study. 3DUS images were acquired both at time of simulation, to form a coregistered CT/3DUS dataset, and at the time of daily treatment delivery. Intrafractional motion between treatment and simulation 3DUS datasets were calculated to determine IGRT shifts. Photon shifts were evaluated isocentrically, while electron shifts were evaluated in the beam's-eye-view. Volume differences between simulation and first boost fraction were calculated. Further, to control for the effect of change in seroma/cavity volume due to time lapse between the 2 sets of images, interfraction IGRT shifts using the first boost fraction as reference for all subsequent treatment fractions were also calculated.

Results

For photon boosts, IGRT shifts were 1.1 ± 0.5 cm and 50% of fractions required a shift >1.0 cm. Volume change between simulation and boost was 49 ± 31%. Shifts when using the first boost fraction as reference were 0.8 ± 0.4 cm and 24% required a shift >1.0 cm. For electron boosts, shifts were 1.0 ± 0.5 cm and 52% fell outside the dosimetric penumbra. Interfraction analysis relative to the first fraction noted the shifts to be 0.8 ± 0.4 cm and 36% fell outside the penumbra.

Conclusion

The lumpectomy cavity can shift significantly during fractionated radiation therapy. 3DUS can be used to image the cavity and correct for interfractional motion. Further studies to better define the protocol for clinical application of IGRT in breast cancer is needed.

Dosimetric impact of post-operative seroma reduction during radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

Three boost radiotherapy (RT) techniques were compared to evaluate the dosimetric effect of seroma reduction during RT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who developed seroma after BCS were included. Each patient underwent three CT scans: one week before RT (CT(-1)), in the third (CT(3)) and fifth (CT(5)) week of RT. For each patient, three plans were generated. (1) SEQ: whole breast irradiation planned on CT(-1,) sequential boost planned on CT(5), (2) SIB: simultaneous integrated boost planned on CT(-1), (3) SIB adaptive radiation therapy (SIB-ART): planned on CT(-1) and re-planned on CT(3). Irradiated volumes, mean lung (MLD) and maximum heart dose (HD(max)) were projected and compared on CT(5).

RESULTS

On average 62% seroma reduction during RT was observed. Volumes receiving ≥ 107% of prescribed whole breast dose were significantly smaller with SIB-ART compared to SEQ and SIB. The undesired volume receiving ≥ 95% of prescribed total dose was also significantly smaller with SIB-ART. For SEQ, SIB-ART and SIB, respectively, small but significant differences were found in MLD (4.2 vs. 4.6 vs. 4.7 Gy) and in HD(max) for patients with left-sided breast cancer (39.9 vs. 35.8 vs. 36.9 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a dosimetric advantage for patients with seroma when simultaneous integrated boost is used with re-planning halfway through treatment.