1
|
Leonardi MC, Zerella MA, Lazzeroni M, Fusco N, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Corso G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Lorubbio C, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Magnoni F. Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:795. [PMID: 38610216 PMCID: PMC11011767 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Viviana Enrica Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Chiara Lorubbio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zerella MA, Zaffaroni M, Ronci G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Fodor C, Rondi E, Vigorito S, Penco S, Sargenti M, Baratella P, Vicini E, Morigi C, Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana S, Galimberti VE, Gandini S, De Camilli E, Renne G, Cattani F, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Leonardi MC. A narrative review for radiation oncologists to implement preoperative partial breast irradiation. Radiol Med 2023; 128:1553-1570. [PMID: 37650981 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01706-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The strategy to anticipate radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, for breast cancer (BC) treatment, has recently generated a renewed interest. Historically, preoperative RT has remained confined either to highly selected patients, in the context of personalized therapy, or to clinical research protocols. Nevertheless, in the recent years, thanks to technological advances and increased tumor biology understanding, RT has undergone great changes that have also impacted the preoperative settings, embracing the modern approach to breast cancer. In particular, the reappraisal of preoperative RT can be viewed within the broader view of personalized and tailored medicine. In fact, preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) allows a more precise target delineation, with less variability in contouring among radiation oncologists, and a smaller treatment volume, possibly leading to lower toxicity and to dose escalation programs. The aim of the present review, which represents a benchmark study for the AIRC IG-23118, is to report available data on different technical aspects of preoperative RT including dosimetric studies, patient's selection and set-up, constraints, target delineation and clinical results. These data, along with the ones that will become available from ongoing studies, may inform the design of the future trials and representing a step toward a tailored APBI approach with the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm in early-stage BC.Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Alessia Zerella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ronci
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Rondi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Penco
- Division of Breast Radiology, IRCSS, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Sargenti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Baratella
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Vicini
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Consuelo Morigi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mariano L, Nicosia L, Pupo D, Olivieri AM, Scolari S, Pesapane F, Latronico A, Bozzini AC, Fusco N, Blanco MC, Mazzarol G, Corso G, Galimberti VE, Venturini M, Pizzamiglio M, Cassano E. A Pictorial Exploration of Mammary Paget Disease: Insights and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5276. [PMID: 37958452 PMCID: PMC10650713 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammary Paget disease (MPD) is a rare condition primarily affecting adult women, characterized by unilateral skin changes in the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and frequently associated with underlying breast carcinoma. Histologically, MPD is identified by large intraepidermal epithelial cells (Paget cells) with distinct characteristics. Immunohistochemical profiles aid in distinguishing MPD from other skin conditions. Clinical evaluation and imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are recommended if MPD is suspected, although definitive diagnosis always requires histological examination. This review delves into the historical context, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of MPD, emphasizing the need for early detection. The classification of MPD based on pathogenesis is explored, shedding light on its varied presentations. Treatment options, including mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery, are discussed with clear guidelines for different scenarios. Adjuvant therapies are considered, particularly in cases with underlying breast cancer. Prognostic factors are outlined, underlining the importance of early intervention. Looking to the future, emerging techniques, like liquid biopsy, new immunohistochemical and molecular markers, and artificial intelligence-based image analysis, hold the potential to transform MPD diagnosis and treatment. These innovations offer hope for early detection and improved patient care, though validation through large-scale clinical trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Mariano
- Breast Imaging Division, AOU Città della Scienza e della Salute di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Via J.H. Dunant, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Davide Pupo
- Radiology Division, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonia Maria Olivieri
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Sofia Scolari
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Antuono Latronico
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (M.C.B.); (G.M.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Marta Cruz Blanco
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (M.C.B.); (G.M.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (M.C.B.); (G.M.)
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- European Cancer Prevention Organization (ECP), 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Enrica Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy;
| | - Maria Pizzamiglio
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO—European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.P.); (A.L.); (A.C.B.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pettini G, Sanchini V, Pat-Horenczyk R, Sousa B, Masiero M, Marzorati C, Galimberti VE, Munzone E, Mattson J, Vehmanen L, Utriainen M, Roziner I, Lemos R, Frasquilho D, Cardoso F, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Kolokotroni E, Stamatakos G, Leskelä RL, Haavisto I, Salonen J, Richter R, Karademas E, Poikonen-Saksela P, Mazzocco K. Predicting Effective Adaptation to Breast Cancer to Help Women BOUNCE Back: Protocol for a Multicenter Clinical Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34564. [PMID: 36222801 PMCID: PMC9607923 DOI: 10.2196/34564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the continued progress of medicine, dealing with breast cancer is becoming a major socioeconomic challenge, particularly due to its increasing incidence. The ability to better manage and adapt to the entire care process depends not only on the type of cancer but also on the patient’s sociodemographic and psychological characteristics as well as on the social environment in which a person lives and interacts. Therefore, it is important to understand which factors may contribute to successful adaptation to breast cancer. To our knowledge, no studies have been performed on the combination effect of multiple psychological, biological, and functional variables in predicting the patient’s ability to bounce back from a stressful life event, such as a breast cancer diagnosis. Here we describe the study protocol of a multicenter clinical study entitled “Predicting Effective Adaptation to Breast Cancer to Help Women to BOUNCE Back” or, in short, BOUNCE. Objective The aim of the study is to build a quantitative mathematical model of factors associated with the capacity for optimal adjustment to cancer and to study resilience through the cancer continuum in a population of patients with breast cancer. Methods A total of 660 women with breast cancer will be recruited from five European cancer centers in Italy, Finland, Israel, and Portugal. Biomedical and psychosocial variables will be collected using the Noona Healthcare platform. Psychosocial, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables will be measured every 3 months, starting from presurgery assessment (ie, baseline) to 18 months after surgery. Temporal data mining, time-series prediction, sequence classification methods, clustering time-series data, and temporal association rules will be used to develop the predictive model. Results The recruitment process stared in January 2019 and ended in November 2021. Preliminary results have been published in a scientific journal and are available for consultation on the BOUNCE project website. Data analysis and dissemination of the study results will be performed in 2022. Conclusions This study will develop a predictive model that is able to describe individual resilience and identify different resilience trajectories along the care process. The results will allow the implementation of tailored interventions according to patients’ needs, supported by eHealth technologies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05095675; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05095675 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34564
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Pettini
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Sanchini
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruth Pat-Horenczyk
- Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Berta Sousa
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marianna Masiero
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Munzone
- Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Johanna Mattson
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena Vehmanen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Meri Utriainen
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilan Roziner
- Department of Communication Disorders, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Raquel Lemos
- Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.,ISPA, Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Diana Frasquilho
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Albino J Oliveira-Maia
- Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, NMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eleni Kolokotroni
- In Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, Athens, Greece.,School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece.,National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Stamatakos
- In Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, Athens, Greece.,School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Athens, Greece.,National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Evangelos Karademas
- Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.,Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Paula Poikonen-Saksela
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zerella MA, Zaffaroni M, Ronci G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Fodor C, Rondi E, Vigorito S, Botta F, Cremonesi M, Garibaldi C, Penco S, Galimberti VE, Intra M, Gandini S, Barberis M, Renne G, Cattani F, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Leonardi MC. Single fraction ablative preoperative radiation treatment for early-stage breast cancer: the CRYSTAL study – a phase I/II clinical trial protocol. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:358. [PMID: 35366825 PMCID: PMC8977020 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09305-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) are the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer (BC). Based on the observation that most local recurrences occurred near the tumor bed, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), consisting of a higher dose per fraction to the tumor bed over a reduced treatment time, has been gaining ground as an attractive alternative in selected patients with low-risk BC. Although more widely delivered in postoperative setting, preoperative APBI has also been investigated in a limited, though increasing, and number of studies. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility, safety and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in a single fraction for selected BC patients. Methods This is a phase I/II, single-arm and open-label single-center clinical trial using CyberKnife. The clinical investigation is supported by a preplanning section which addresses technical and dosimetric issues. The primary endpoint for the phase I study, covering the 1st and 2nd year of the research project, is the identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) which meets a specific target toxicity level (no grade 3–4 toxicity). The primary endpoint for the phase II study (3rd to 5th year) is the evaluation of treatment efficacy measured in terms of pathological complete response rate. Discussion The study will investigate the response of BC to the preoperative APBI from different perspectives. While preoperative APBI represents a form of anticipated boost, followed by WBRT, different are the implications for the scientific community. The study may help to identify good responders for whom surgery could be omitted. It is especially appealing for patients unfit for surgery due to advanced age or severe co-morbidities, in addition to or instead of systemic therapies, to ensure long-term local control. Moreover, patients with oligometastatic disease synchronous with primary BC may benefit from APBI on the intact tumor in terms of tumor progression free survival. The study of response to RT can provide useful information about BC radiobiology, immunologic reactions, genomic expression, and radiomics features, to be tested on a larger scale. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454).
Collapse
|
6
|
Dicuonzo S, Patti F, Luraschi R, Frassoni S, Rojas DP, Zaffaroni M, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Zerella MA, Emiro F, Cattani F, Bagnardi V, Fodor CI, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Orecchia R, Leonardi MC, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Comparing TomoHelical and TomoDirect in postmastectomy hypofractionated radiotherapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Phys Med 2021; 90:66-72. [PMID: 34563833 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with TomoHelical™ (TH) or TomoDirect™ (TD) allows a uniform target coverage. In this study, we compare treatment plans using TD and TH in the setting of hypofractionated PMRT and immediate breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS The TD-treatment plans of breast cancer patients treated between May 2016 and August 2019 were retrospectively selected. All the TD plans were re-planned on TH with the same prescription dose (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) and according to our dose/volume constraints. Data about the 2 treatment plans were compared with a focus on PTV coverage and all the organs at risk (OARs) constraints. RESULTS Fifty patients for a total number of 100 treatment plans (50 with TD and 50 re-planned with TH) were analyzed. All the median value in the TD PTV CHEST WALL plans fulfilled the predefined planning objectives, even though TH emerged as best for target coverage with statistically significant difference for V90%. TD provided the lowest V95% for the PTV SVC, but the median value was near to the recommended value of 90% (89.8 % vs 98.6% for TD and TH, respectively). Overall, TD reached the best OARs sparing. The main statistically significant differences with TH were for contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung. All the other dose values for TH were higher than TD, but they fulfilled the recommended/acceptable predefined planning objectives. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of PMRT, TD compared to TH reached an acceptable target volume coverage, with an optimal sparing of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Patti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesca Emiro
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rojas DP, Leonardi MC, Frassoni S, Morra A, Gerardi MA, La Rocca E, Cattani F, Luraschi R, Fodor C, Zaffaroni M, Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Intra M, Bagnardi V, Orecchia R, Dicuonzo S, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Implant risk failure in patients undergoing postmastectomy 3-week hypofractionated radiotherapy after immediate reconstruction. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:105-113. [PMID: 34419507 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate reconstruction failure (RF) rate in patients receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Stage II-III breast cancer patients, treated with HF-PMRT using intensity modulated radiotherapy were stratified in two groups according to IBR: single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI-group) and two-stage expander and implant (TE/I-group). Irradiated patients were matched with non-irradiated ones who underwent the same IBR during the same period. Prescription dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions to chest wall and infra/supraclavicular nodal region. Primary endpoint was RF defined as the need of major revisional surgery (MaRS) for implant removal or conversion to autologous reconstruction. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor revisional surgeries (MiRS) including implant repositioning or substitution with another implant. RESULTS One hundred and seven irradiated patients (62 in TE/I-group, 45 in DTI-group) were matched with 107 non-irradiated subjects. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (0.1-6.1) In the TE/I setting, MaRS was performed in 8/62 irradiated patients (12.9%) of the irradiated TE/I group compared to 1/62 (1.6%) non-irradiated subjects (p = 0.015). In the DTI setting, MaRs occurred in 3/45 irradiated patients (6.7%) compared to 1/45 non-irradiated ones (2.2%) (p = 0.35). Overall MaRS rate was 10.3% in the irradiated group. MiRS was performed in 35.6% and 31.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated DTI-groups (p = 0.65), respectively, and in 12.9% and 8.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated TE/I groups (p = 0.38), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared to the non-irradiated counterparts, the TE/I group showed higher rate of RF, while no statistically significant difference was observed for the DTI group. The use of hypofractionation and IMRT to implant-based IBR did not seem to increase the risk of RF which appeared to be in line with the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Eliana La Rocca
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rietjens
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca De Lorenzi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Intra
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicosia L, Latronico A, Farina M, Bozzini AC, Baratella P, Galimberti VE, Fiori S, Montesano M, Cassano E. Myeloid sarcoma of the breast: a pathology that should not be forgotten. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1160. [PMID: 33574905 PMCID: PMC7864689 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a rare neoplasm, represented by a tumoural mass composed of myeloid blasts, occurring at any anatomical site other than the bone marrow. MS is considered the tissue-based equivalent of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), requiring the same therapeutic specification, independently from the association with previous or coexisting myeloid neoplasms. Isolated breast involvement by MS is exceedingly rare, with only exceptional cases reported in the literature. This work aims to provide a pictorial essay of the main features of breast involvement by MS. Even though it is a rare condition, we should not forget this neoplasm, and its possibility of being disguised by the AML, as it requires prompt treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Department of Breast Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Antuono Latronico
- Department of Breast Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Mariagiorgia Farina
- Department of Breast Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Department of Breast Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Baratella
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Fiori
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Montesano
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Department of Breast Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leonardi MC, Montagna E, Galimberti VE, Zaffaroni M, Rojas DP, Dicuonzo S, Zerella MA, Morra A, Sangalli C, Gandini S, Colleoni M, Veronesi P, Gerardi MA, Alterio D, Lazzari R, Sarra Fiore M, Bufi G, Cattani F, Mastrilli F, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Breast Adjuvant Radiotherapy Amid the COVID-19 Crisis in a Hub Cancer Center, Lombardy, Italy. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 5:1-7. [PMID: 34191930 PMCID: PMC7801963 DOI: 10.1159/000513227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction During the COVID-19 pandemic, Lombardy (Northern Italy) Regional Health Council created hubs for cancer care, meant to be SARS-CoV-2-free pathways for cancer patients. The workflow of breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) in one of the hubs is presented here. Methods Candidates to adjuvant RT during the pandemic peak of March-April 2020 were compared to those treated in the same period of 2019, and patient volume, deferral rate, and type of RT were analyzed. Statistics were calculated with χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and the Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables. Results In March-April 2020 the BC patient volume increased by 28% compared to the same period in 2019 (scheduled patients: 175 vs. 137) and amid travel restrictions it was kept high (treated patients: 136 vs. 133), mainly due to an influx from across Lombardy. RT schemes basically did not change, being already centered on hypofractionation. The increase of median time (67 vs. 74.5 days in 2019 and 2020, respectively) to the commencement of RT for low-risk patients was clinically negligible yet statistically significant (p = 0.03), and in line with the pertinent recommendations. No significant difference was found in the time interval between treatments and RT for high-risk patients. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy was avoided throughout the pandemic peak. Twenty-one women (13.6%) delayed either computed tomography simulation or RT commencement mainly because of COVID-19-related concerns and mobility restrictions. Conclusion The workload for BC was high during the pandemic peak. Hubs allowed the continuation of oncologic treatments, while mitigating the strain on frontline COVID-19 hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emilia Montagna
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Sangalli
- Division of Data Management, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Lazzari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Sarra Fiore
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giammaria Bufi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Mastrilli
- Medical Administration, CMO, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vavassori A, Riva G, Cavallo I, Spoto R, Dicuonzo S, Fodor C, Comi S, Cambria R, Cattani F, Morra A, Leonardi MC, Lazzari R, Intra M, Luini A, Galimberti VE, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. High-dose-rate Brachytherapy as Adjuvant Local rEirradiation for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent breAst cancer (BALESTRA): a retrospective mono-institutional study. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:207-215. [PMID: 32695191 PMCID: PMC7366017 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.96860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate clinical results of catheter-based interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as adjuvant treatment in previously irradiated recurrent breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2011 and September 2015, 31 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed recurrent breast cancer after conservative surgery and conventional whole breast radiotherapy, were retreated with a second conservative surgical resection and reirradiated with adjuvant interstitial HDR-BT. None of the brachytherapy implant was performed during the quadrantectomy procedure. A dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions, 2 fractions per day, with a minimal interval of 6 hours was delivered. RESULTS At the time of the implant, the median age of patients was 59.7 years (range, 39.3-74.9 years). The median time from first treatment until BT for local recurrence was 11.9 years (range, 2.5-27.8 years). The median interval between salvage surgery and BT was 3.6 months (range, 1-8.2 months). No acute epidermitis or soft tissue side effects higher than grade 2 were recorded, with good cosmetic results in all patients. Most of the patients presented grade 1-2 late side effects. Only one patient developed grade 3 liponecrosis. After a median follow-up of 73.7 months (range, 28.8-102.4 months), the overall survival and cancer specific survival were 87.1% and 90.3%, respectively; 5-year local control and 5-year progression-free survival rate were 90.3% and 83.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary analysis showed that HDR-BT is a feasible treatment for partial breast reirradiation offering very low complications rate and fast procedure. Higher patients' cohort is warranted in order to define the role of this treatment modality in the breast conservative management of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Iacopo Cavallo
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Spoto
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cambria
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Lazzari
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Intra
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Luini
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leonardi MC, Tomio L, Radice D, Takanen S, Bonzano E, Alessandro M, Ciabattoni A, Ivaldi GB, Bagnardi V, Alessandro O, Francia CM, Fodor C, Miglietta E, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Orecchia R, Tagliaferri L, Vidali C, Massaccesi M, Guenzi M, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Local Failure After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation with Intraoperative Radiotherapy with Electrons: An Insight into Management and Outcome from an Italian Multicentric Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:752-762. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08075-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
12
|
Corrao G, Rojas DP, Ciardo D, Fanetti G, Dicuonzo S, Mantovani M, Gerardi MA, Dell'Acqua V, Morra A, Fodor C, Galimberti VE, Veronesi P, Cattani F, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Leonardi MC. Intra- and inter-observer variability in breast tumour bed contouring and the controversial role of surgical clips. Med Oncol 2019; 36:51. [PMID: 31037520 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1273-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the visualization of surgical clips (SCs) on the same set of planning computed tomography (CT) of breast cancer (BC) patients influences agreement on tumour bed (TB) delineation. Planning CT (CTorig) of 47 BC patients with SCs to visualize the TB was processed in order to blur SCs and create a virtual CT (CTmod). Four radiation oncologists (ROs, 2 juniors and 2 seniors) contoured TB on both the CT sets. Centre of mass distance (CMD), percentage overlap as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface distance as average Hausdorff distance (AHD) and TB volume size were analysed. The intra-observer variability when contouring TB with and without SCs was statistically significant (p-values = 0.016, 0.0002 and ≪ 0.001 for CMD, AHD and DSC, respectively). Junior ROs showed worse reproducibility compared to seniors. The median DSC was < 0.7. The inter-observer variability with and without SCs was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all metrics, with an increase of 48.7% in DSC and decrease of 50.7% and 57.1% in CMD and AHD, respectively, as relative median values, when SCs were visible. Regarding TB volumes, when SCs were visible, the intra-observer analysis revealed that 3/4 ROs delineated larger volumes, especially juniors. The inter-observer analysis showed that, in presence of visible SCs, the difference in TB volume among all the ROs fell from statistically significant to borderline significance (p = 0.052). TB contouring is confirmed to be an observer-dependent task. SCs decreased the intra and inter-observer variability but the overall agreement between ROs remained low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marinella Mantovani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leonardi MC, Corrao G, Frassoni S, Vingiani A, Dicuonzo S, Lazzeroni M, Fodor C, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Rojas DP, Dell'Acqua V, Marvaso G, Bassi FD, Galimberti VE, Veronesi P, Miglietta E, Cattani F, Zurrida S, Bagnardi V, Viale G, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Ductal carcinoma in situ and intraoperative partial breast irradiation: Who are the best candidates? Long-term outcome of a single institution series. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:68-76. [PMID: 30935584 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To report the long-term outcome of a single institution series of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with accelerated partial irradiation using intraoperative electrons (IOERT). METHODS From 2000 to 2010, 180 DCIS patients, treated with quadrantectomy and 21 Gy IOERT, were analyzed in terms of ipsilateral breast recurrences (IBRs) and survival outcomes by stratification in two subgroups. The low-risk group included patients who fulfilled the suitable definition according to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Guidelines (size ≤2.5 cm, grade 1-2 and surgical margins ≥3 mm) (Suitable), while the remaining ones formed the high-risk group (Non-Suitable). RESULTS Eighty-four and 96 patients formed the Suitable and Non-Suitable groups, respectively. In the whole population, the cumulative incidence of IBR at 5, 7 and 10 years was 19%, 21%, and 25%, respectively. In the Suitable group, the cumulative incidence of IBR remained constant at 11% throughout the years, while in the Non-Suitable group increased from 26% at 5 years to 36% at 10 years (p < 0.0001). When hormonal positivity and HER2 absence of expression were added to the selection of the Suitable group, the cumulative incidence of IBR dropped and stabilized at 4% at 10 years. None died of breast cancer. In the whole population, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rate was 98% and 96.5%, respectively, without any difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The overall and by group IBR rates were high and stricter criteria are required for acceptable local control for Suitable DCIS. Because of the concerns raised, IOERT should not be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Dell'Acqua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Domenico Bassi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Miglietta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Zurrida
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Leonardi MC, Maisonneuve P, Mastropasqua MG, Cattani F, Fanetti G, Morra A, Lazzari R, Bazzani F, Caputo M, Rotmensz N, Gerardi MA, Ricotti R, Enrica Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Dicuonzo S, Viale G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R. Comparison of Treatment Outcome Between Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas in Patients Receiving Partial Breast Irradiation With Intraoperative Electrons. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:173-181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Veronesi U, De Cicco C, Galimberti VE, Fernandez JR, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Spano G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Berrettini A, Paganelli G. A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. Ann Oncol 2006; 18:473-8. [PMID: 17164229 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become a standard treatment in staging axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer. SNB, however, is an invasive procedure and is time-consuming when the sentinel node is analysed intra-operatively. Breast cancer is frequently characterised by increased 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake and many studies have shown encouraging results in detecting axillary lymph node metastases. The aim of this study was to compare SNB and -positron emission tomography (-PET) imaging, to assess their values in detecting occult axillary metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 236 patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axilla were enrolled in the study. 18-FDG-PET was carried out before surgery, using a positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography scanner. In all patients, SNB was carried out after identification through lymphoscintigraphy. Patients underwent axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) in cases of positive FDG-PET or positive SNB. The results of PET scan were compared with histopathology of SNB and ALND. RESULTS In all, 103 out of the 236 patients (44%) had metastases in axillary nodes. Sensitivity of FDG-PET scan for detection of axillary lymph node metastases in this series was low (37%); however, specificity and positive predictive values were acceptable (96% and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The high specificity of PET imaging indicates that patients who have a PET-positive axilla should have an ALND rather than an SNB for axillary staging. In contrast, FDG-PET showed poor sensitivity in the detection of axillary metastases, confirming the need for SNB in cases where PET is negative in the axilla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Veronesi
- Division of Senology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|