1
|
Welzel T, Saager M, Peschke P, Debus J, Karger CP. Effects of Photon versus Carbon-Ion Irradiation in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord - a Serial T2 and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Radiat Res 2024; 202:11-15. [PMID: 38724886 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00151.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Carbon-ion irradiation is increasingly used at the skull base and spine near the radiation-sensitive spinal cord. To better characterize the in vivo radiation response of the cervical spinal cord, radiogenic changes in the high-dose area were measured in rats using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion measurements in comparison to conventional photon irradiations. In this longitudinal MRI study, we examined the gray matter (GM) of the cervical spinal cord in 16 female Sprague-Dawley rats after high-dose photon (n = 8) or carbon-ion (12C) irradiation (n = 8) and in 6 sham-exposed rats until myelopathy occurred. The differences in the diffusion pattern of the GM of the cervical spinal cord were examined until the endpoint of the study, occurrence of paresis grade II of both forelimbs was reached. In both radiation techniques, the same order of the occurrence of MR-morphological pathologies was observed - from edema formation to a blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) disruption to paresis grade II of both forelimbs. However, carbon-ion irradiation showed a significant increase of the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; P = 0.031) with development of a BSCB disruption in the GM. Animals with paresis grade II as a late radiation response had a highly significant increase in mean ADC (P = 0.0001) after carbon-ion irradiation. At this time, a tendency was observed for higher mean ADC values in the GM after 12C irradiation as compared to photon irradiation (P = 0.059). These findings demonstrated that carbon-ion irradiation leads to greater structural damage to the GM of the rat cervical spinal cord than photon irradiation due to its higher linear energy transfer (LET) value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Heidelberg (Germany) Medical School, 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberger Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Saager
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Heidelberg (Germany) Medical School, 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberger Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Góra J, Grosshagauer S, Fossati P, Mumot M, Stock M, Schafasand M, Carlino A. The sensitivity of radiobiological models in carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and its consequences on the clinical treatment plan: Differences between LEM and MKM models. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14321. [PMID: 38436509 PMCID: PMC11244672 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) relies on relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose calculations. Japanese clinics predominantly use the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), while European centers utilize the local effect model (LEM). Despite both models estimating RBE-distributions in tissue, their physical and mathematical assumptions differ, leading to significant disparities in RBE-weighted doses. Several European clinics adopted Japanese treatment schedules, necessitating adjustments in dose prescriptions and organ at risk (OAR) constraints. In the context of these two clinically used standards for RBE-weighted dose estimation, the objective of this study was to highlight specific scenarios for which the translations between models diverge, as shortcomings between them can influence clinical decisions. METHODS Our aim was to discuss planning strategies minimizing those discrepancies, ultimately striving for more accurate and robust treatments. Evaluations were conducted in a virtual water phantom and patient CT-geometry, optimizing LEM RBE-weighted dose first and recomputing MKM thereafter. Dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) distributions were also assessed. RESULTS Results demonstrate how various parameters influence LEM/MKM translation. Similar LEM-dose distributions lead to markedly different MKM-dose distributions and variations in LETd. Generally, a homogeneous LEM RBE-weighted dose aligns with lower MKM values in most of the target volume. Nevertheless, paradoxical MKM hotspots may emerge (at the end of the range), potentially influencing clinical outcomes. Therefore, translation between models requires great caution. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the relationship between these two clinical standards enables combining European and Japanese based experiences. The implementation of optimal planning strategies ensures the safety and acceptability of the clinical plan for both models and therefore enhances plan robustness from the RBE-weighted dose and LETd distribution point of view. This study emphasizes the importance of optimal planning strategies and the need for comprehensive CIRT plan quality assessment tools. In situations where simultaneous LEM and MKM computation capabilities are lacking, it can provide guidance in plan design, ultimately contributing to enhanced CIRT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Góra
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
| | - Sarah Grosshagauer
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
- Technical University of ViennaWienAustria
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesKrems an der DonauAustria
| | - Marta Mumot
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesKrems an der DonauAustria
| | - Mansure Schafasand
- MedAustron Ion Therapy CenterWiener NeustadtAustria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesKrems an der DonauAustria
- Medical University of ViennaWienAustria
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Denbeigh JM, Howard ME, Garcia DA, Debrot EK, Cole KC, Remmes NB, Beltran CJ. Characterizing Proton-Induced Biological Effects in a Mouse Spinal Cord Model: A Comparison of Bragg Peak and Entrance Beam Response in Single and Fractionated Exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:924-935. [PMID: 38310485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is a dynamic variable influenced by factors like linear energy transfer (LET), dose, tissue type, and biological endpoint. The standard fixed proton RBE of 1.1, currently used in clinical planning, may not accurately represent the true biological effects of proton therapy (PT) in all cases. This uncertainty can contribute to radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in patients. In late-responding tissues such as the spinal cord, toxicity can cause devastating complications. This study investigated spinal cord tolerance in mice subjected to proton irradiation and characterized the influence of fractionation on proton- induced myelopathy at entrance (ENT) and Bragg peak (BP) positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Cervical spinal cords of 8-week-old C57BL/6J female mice were irradiated with single- or multi-fractions (18x) using lateral opposed radiation fields at 1 of 2 positions along the Bragg curve: ENT (dose-mean LET = 1.2 keV/μm) and BP (LET = 6.9 keV/μm). Mice were monitored over 1 year for changes in weight, mobility, and general health, with radiation-induced myelopathy as the primary biological endpoint. Calculations of the RBE of the ENT and BP curve (RBEENT/BP) were performed. RESULTS Single-fraction RBEENT/BP for 50% effect probability (tolerance dose (TD50), grade II paresis, determined using log-logistic model fitting) was 1.10 ± 0.06 (95% CI) and for multifraction treatments it was 1.19 ± 0.05 (95% CI). Higher incidence and faster onset of paralysis were seen in mice treated at the BP compared with ENT. CONCLUSIONS The findings challenge the universally fixed RBE value in PT, indicating up to a 25% mouse spinal cord RBEENT/BP variation for multifraction treatments. These results highlight the importance of considering fractionation in determining RBE for PT. Robust characterization of proton-induced toxicity, aided by in vivo models, is paramount for refining clinical decision-making and mitigating potential patient side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Michelle E Howard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Darwin A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Emily K Debrot
- St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristin C Cole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glowa C, Saager M, Hintz L, Euler-Lange R, Peschke P, Brons S, Scholz M, Mein S, Mairani A, Karger CP. Relative biological effectiveness of oxygen ion beams in the rat spinal cord: Dependence on linear energy transfer and dose and comparison with model predictions. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100581. [PMID: 38711920 PMCID: PMC11070926 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Ion beams exhibit an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) with respect to photons. This study determined the RBE of oxygen ion beams as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose in the rat spinal cord. Materials and methods The spinal cord of rats was irradiated at four different positions of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (LET: 26, 66, 98 and 141 keV/µm) using increasing levels of single and split oxygen ion doses. Dose-response curves were established for the endpoint paresis grade II and based on ED50 (dose at 50 % effect probability), the RBE was determined and compared to model predictions. Results When LET increased from 26 to 98 keV/µm, ED50 decreased from 17.2 ± 0.3 Gy to 13.5 ± 0.4 Gy for single and from 21.7 ± 0.4 Gy to 15.5 ± 0.5 Gy for split doses, however, at 141 keV/µm, ED50 rose again to 15.8 ± 0.4 Gy and 17.2 ± 0.4 Gy, respectively. As a result, the RBE increased from 1.43 ± 0.05 to 1.82 ± 0.08 (single dose) and from 1.58 ± 0.04 to 2.21 ± 0.08 (split dose), respectively, before declining again to 1.56 ± 0.06 for single and 1.99 ± 0.06 for split doses at the highest LET. Deviations from RBE-predictions were model-dependent. Conclusion This study established first RBE data for the late reacting central nervous system after single and split doses of oxygen ions. The data was used to validate the RBE-dependence on LET and dose of three RBE-models. This study extends the existing data base for protons, helium and carbon ions and provides important information for future patient treatments with oxygen ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Glowa
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Saager
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Hintz
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rosemarie Euler-Lange
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiooncology/Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | - Christian P. Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang K, Yan C, Abdelghany L, Zhang X, Jingu K, Li TS. Nicaraven attenuates the acquired radioresistance of established tumors in mouse models via PARP inhibition. Mol Cell Biochem 2024:10.1007/s11010-024-04958-6. [PMID: 38466467 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-024-04958-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Nicaraven has been reported to inhibit the activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). In this study, we investigated the probable ability of nicaraven to attenuate cancer radioresistance during fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor models were established in C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c nude mice by subcutaneous injection of Lewis mouse lung carcinoma cancer cells and A549 human lung cancer cells, respectively. When the tumors had grown to approximately 100 mm3, we initiated fractionated radiotherapy. Nicaraven or saline was administered immediately after each irradiation exposure. Compared to saline treatment, nicaraven administration significantly induced gamma-H2AX foci formation and cell apoptosis in tumors at 1 or 3 days after an additional challenge exposure to 10 Gy and inhibited tumor growth during the short-term follow-up period, suggesting increased radiosensitivity of cancer cells. Moreover, the expression of PARP in tumor tissue was decreased by nicaraven administration. Our data suggest that nicaraven likely attenuates the acquired radioresistance of cancers through PARP inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Huang
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Chen Yan
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Lina Abdelghany
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba Ward, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0872, Japan
| | - Tao-Sheng Li
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wakisaka Y, Minami K, Okada N, Tsubouchi T, Hamatani N, Yagi M, Takashina M, Kanai T. Treatment planning of carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer based on cellular experiments with PC3 human prostate cancer cells. Phys Med 2023; 107:102537. [PMID: 36780791 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] Treatment plans for carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in Japan are designed to uniformly deliver the prescribed clinical dose based on the radiosensitivity of human salivary gland (HSG) cells to the planning target volume (PTV). However, sensitivity to carbon beams varies between cell lines, that is, it should be checked that the clinical dose distribution based on the cell radiosensitivity of the treatment site is uniform within the PTV. [Methods] We modeled the linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the linear-quadratic (LQ) coefficients specific to prostate cancer, which accounts for the majority of CIRT. This was achieved by irradiating prostate cancer cells (PC3) with X-rays from a 4 MV-Linac and carbon beams with different LETs of 11.1-214.3 keV/μm. By using the radiosensitivity of PC3 cells derived from cellular experiments, we reconstructed prostate-cancer-specific clinical dose distributions on patient computed tomography (CT). [Results] The LQ coefficient, α, of PC3 cells was larger than that of HSG cells at low (<50 keV/μm) LET and smaller at high (>50 keV/μm) LET, which was validated by cellular experiments performed on rectangular SOBPs. The reconstructed dose distribution on patient CT was sloped when 1 fraction incident from the one side of the patient was considered, but remained uniform from the sum of 12 fractions of the left-right opposing beams (as is used in clinical practice). [Conclusion] Our study reveals the inhomogeneity of clinical doses in single-field plans calculated using the PC3 radiosensitivity data. However, this inhomogeneity is compensated by using the combination of left-right opposing beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushi Wakisaka
- Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Kazumasa Minami
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nao Okada
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Masashi Yagi
- Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan; Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Tatsuaki Kanai
- Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The 'stealth-bomber' paradigm for deciphering the tumour response to carbon-ion irradiation. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1429-1438. [PMID: 36639527 PMCID: PMC10070470 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02117-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the higher biological efficacy of carbon-ion irradiation (C-ions) and their ballistic precision compared with photons. At the nanometre scale, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by radiation and responsible for the indirect effects are differentially distributed according to the type of radiation. Photon irradiation induces a homogeneous ROS distribution, whereas ROS remain condensed in clusters in the C-ions tracks. Based on this linear energy transfer-dependent differential nanometric ROS distribution, we propose that the higher biological efficacy and specificities of the molecular response to C-ions rely on a 'stealth-bomber' effect. When biological targets are on the trajectories of the particles, the clustered radicals in the tracks are responsible for a 'bomber' effect. Furthermore, the low proportion of ROS outside the tracks is not able to trigger the cellular mechanisms of defence and proliferation. The ability of C-ions to deceive the cellular defence of the cancer cells is then categorised as a 'stealth' effect. This review aims to classify the biological arguments supporting the paradigm of the 'stealth-bomber' as responsible for the biological superiority of C-ions compared with photons. It also explains how and why C-ions will always be more efficient for treating patients with radioresistant cancers than conventional radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Q, Liu R, Zhang Q, Luo H, Wu X, Du T, Chen Y, Tan M, Liu Z, Sun S, Yang K, Tian J, Wang X. Biological effects of cancer stem cells irradiated by charged particle: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-022-04561-6. [PMID: 36611110 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04561-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is closely related to tumor recurrence, metastasis, and resistance to chemoradiotherapy. In addition, given the unique physical and biological advantages of charged particle, we hypothesized that charged particle irradiation would produce strong killing effects on CSCs. The purpose of our systematic review is to evaluate the biological effects of CSCs irradiated by charged particle, including proliferation, invasion, migration, and changes in the molecular level. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until 17 march 2022 according to the key words. Included studies have to be vitro studies of CSCs irradiated by charged particle. Outcomes included one or more of radiation sensitivity, proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and molecular level changes, like DNA damage after been irradiated. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included in the final analysis. The 18 articles include 12-carbon ion irradiation, 4-proton irradiation, 1 α-particle irradiation, 1-carbon ion combine proton irradiation. CONCLUSION Through the extraction and analysis of data, we came to this conclusion: CSCs have obvious radio-resistance compared with non-CSCs, and charged particle irradiation or in combination with drugs could overcome this resistance, specifically manifested in inhibiting CSCs' proliferation, invasion, migration, and causing more and harder to repair DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB) of CSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Xun Wu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Tianqi Du
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Yanliang Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Mingyu Tan
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Shilong Sun
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730030, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 730030, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kozłowska WS, Carante MP, Aricò G, Embriaco A, Ferrari A, Magro G, Mairani A, Ramos R, Sala P, Georg D, Ballarini F. First application of the BIANCA biophysical model to carbon-ion patient cases. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac702b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. The main objective of this work consists of applying, for the first time, the BIANCA (BIophysical ANalysis of Cell death and chromosome Aberrations) biophysical model to the RBE calculation for C-ion cancer patients, and comparing the outcomes with those obtained by the LEM I model, which is applied in clinics. Indeed, the continuous development of heavy-ion cancer therapy requires modelling of biological effects of ion beams on tumours and normal tissues. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of heavy ions is higher than that of protons, with a significant variation along the beam path. Therefore, it requires a precise modelling, especially for the pencil-beam scanning technique. Currently, two radiobiological models, LEM I and MKM, are in use for heavy ions in scanned pencil-beam facilities. Approach. Utilizing an interface with the FLUKA Particle Therapy Tool, BIANCA was applied to re-calculate the RBE-weighted dose distribution for carbon-ion treatment of three patients (chordoma, head-and-neck and prostate) previously irradiated at CNAO, where radiobiological optimization was based on LEM I. The predictions obtained by BIANCA were based either on chordoma cell survival (RBE
surv
), or on dicentric aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes (RBE
ab
), which are indicators of late normal tissue damage, including secondary tumours. The simulation outcomes were then compared with those provided by LEM I. Main results. While in the target and in the entrance channel BIANCA predictions were lower than those obtained by LEM I, the two models provided very similar results in the considered OAR. The observed differences between RBE
surv
and RBE
ab
(which were also dependent on fractional dose and LET) suggest that in normal tissues the information on cell survival should be integrated by information more closely related to the induction of late damage, such as chromosome aberrations. Significance. This work showed that BIANCA is suitable for treatment plan optimization in ion-beam therapy, especially considering that it can predict both cell survival and chromosome aberrations and has previously shown good agreement with carbon-ion experimental data.
Collapse
|
10
|
Impact of DNA Repair Kinetics and Dose Rate on RBE Predictions in the UNIVERSE. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23116268. [PMID: 35682947 PMCID: PMC9181644 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate knowledge of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and its dependencies is crucial to support modern ion beam therapy and its further development. However, the influence of different dose rates of the reference radiation and ion beam are rarely considered. The ion beam RBE-model within our "UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine" (UNIVERSE) is extended by including DNA damage repair kinetics to investigate the impact of dose-rate effects on the predicted RBE. It was found that dose-rate effects increase with dose and biological effects saturate at high dose-rates, which is consistent with data- and model-based studies in the literature. In a comparison with RBE measurements from a high dose in-vivo study, the predictions of the presented modification were found to be improved in comparison to the previous version of UNIVERSE and existing clinical approaches that disregard dose-rate effects. Consequently, DNA repair kinetics and the different dose rates applied by the reference and ion beams might need to be considered in biophysical models to accurately predict the RBE. Additionally, this study marks an important step in the further development of UNIVERSE, extending its capabilities in giving theoretical guidance to support progress in ion beam therapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhattacharyya T, Koto M, Windisch P, Ikawa H, Hagiwara Y, Tsuji H, Adeberg S. Emerging Role of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Reirradiation of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancers: What Have We Achieved So Far? Front Oncol 2022; 12:888446. [PMID: 35677171 PMCID: PMC9167994 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Administering reirradiation for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers is extremely challenging. These tumors are hypoxic and radioresistant and require escalated radiation doses for adequate control. The obstacle to delivering this escalated dose of radiation to the target is its proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs) and possible development of consequent severe late toxicities. With the emergence of highly sophisticated technologies, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy have shown promising outcomes. Proton beam radiotherapy has been used for locally recurrent head and neck cancers because of its excellent physical dose distribution, exploring sharp Bragg peak properties with negligible entrance and exit doses. To further improve these results, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been explored in several countries across Europe and Asia because of its favorable physical properties with minimal entrance and exit doses, sharper lateral penumbra, and much higher and variable relative biological efficacy, which cannot be currently achieved with any other form of radiation. Few studies have described the role of CIRT in recurrent head and neck cancers. In this article, we have discussed the different aspects of carbon ions in reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancers, including European and Asian experiences, different dose schedules, dose constraints of OARs, outcomes, and toxicities, and a brief comparison with proton beam radiotherapy and IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhito Hagiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Relative biological effectiveness of single and split helium ion doses in the rat spinal cord increases strongly with linear energy transfer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:224-230. [PMID: 35367526 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Determination of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of helium ions as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) for single and split doses using the rat cervical spinal cord as model system for late-responding normal tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS The rat cervical spinal cord was irradiated at four different positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP) (LET 2.9, 9.4, 14.4 and 20.7 keV/µm) using increasing levels of single or split doses of helium ions. Dose-response curves were determined and based on TD50-values (dose at 50% effect probability using paresis II as endpoint), RBE-values were derived for the endpoint of radiation-induced myelopathy. RESULTS With increasing LET, RBE-values increased from 1.13 ± 0.04 to 1.42 ± 0.05 (single dose) and 1.12 ± 0.03 to 1.50 ± 0.04 (split doses) as TD50-values decreased from 21.7 ± 0.3 Gy to 17.3 ± 0.3 Gy (single dose) and 30.6 ± 0.3 Gy to 22.9 ± 0.3 Gy (split doses), respectively. RBE-models (LEM I and IV, mMKM) deviated differently for single and split doses but described the RBE variation in the high-LET region sufficiently accurate. CONCLUSION This study established the LET-dependence of the RBE for late effects in the central nervous system after single and split doses of helium ions. The results extend the existing database for protons and carbon ions and allow systematic testing of RBE-models. While the RBE-values of helium were generally lower than for carbon ions, the increase at the distal edge of the Bragg-peak was larger than for protons, making detailed RBE-modeling necessary.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ando K, Yoshida Y, Hirayama R, Koike S, Matsufuji N. Dose- and LET-dependent changes in mouse skin contracture up to a year after either single dose or fractionated doses of carbon ion or gamma rays. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:221-229. [PMID: 35021226 PMCID: PMC8944303 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Time dependence of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions for skin damage was investigated to answer the question of whether the flat distribution of biological doses within a Spread-Out Bragg peak (SOBP) which is designed based on in vitro cell kill could also be flat for in vivo late responding tissue. Two spots of Indian ink intracutaneously injected into the legs of C3H mice were measured by calipers. An equieffective dose to produce 30% skin contraction was calculated from a dose-response curve and used to calculate the RBE of carbon ion beams. We discovered skin contraction progressed after irradiation and then reached a stable/slow progression phase. Equieffective doses decreased with time and the decrease was most prominent for gamma rays and least prominent for 100 keV/μm carbon ions. Survival parameter of alpha but not beta in the linear-quadratic model is closely related to the RBE of carbon ions. Biological doses within the SOBP increased with time but their distribution was still flat up to 1 year after irradiation. The outcomes of skin contraction studies suggest that (i) despite the higher RBE for skin contracture after carbon ions compared to gamma rays, gamma rays can result in a more severe late effect of skin contracture. This is due to the carbon effect saturating at a lower dose than gamma rays, and (ii) the biological dose distribution throughout the SOBP remains approximately the same even one year after exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Ando
- Corresponding author. Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Showa-machi 3-39-22, Maebashi0shi, Gunma, Japan 371-8511, Email address:
| | - Yukari Yoshida
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Showa-machi 3-39-22, Maebashi-shi, Gunma, Japan 371-8511
| | - Ryoichi Hirayama
- Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Anagawa 4-9-1, Chiba, Japan 263-8555
| | - Sachiko Koike
- Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Anagawa 4-9-1, Chiba, Japan 263-8555
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Anagawa 4-9-1, Chiba, Japan 263-8555
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jäkel O, Kraft G, Karger CP. The history of ion beam therapy in Germany. Z Med Phys 2022; 32:6-22. [PMID: 35101337 PMCID: PMC9948864 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The advantageous depth dose profile of ion beams together with state of the art beam delivery and treatment planning systems allow for highly conformal tumor treatments in patients. First treatments date back to 1954 at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) and in Europe, ion beam therapy started in the mid-1990s at the Paul-Scherrer Institute (PSI) with protons and at the Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI) with carbon ions, followed by the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT) in Heidelberg. This review describes the historical development of ion beam therapy in Germany based on the pioneering work at LBL and in the context of simultaneous developments in other countries as well as recent developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT) at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Gerhard Kraft
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Christian P. Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bendinger AL, Welzel T, Huang L, Babushkina I, Peschke P, Debus J, Glowa C, Karger CP, Saager M. DCE-MRI detected vascular permeability changes in the rat spinal cord do not explain shorter latency times for paresis after carbon ions relative to photons. Radiother Oncol 2021; 165:126-134. [PMID: 34634380 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation-induced myelopathy, an irreversible complication occurring after a long symptom-free latency time, is preceded by a fixed sequence of magnetic resonance- (MR-) visible morphological alterations. Vascular degradation is assumed the main reason for radiation-induced myelopathy. We used dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI to identify different vascular changes after photon and carbon ion irradiation, which precede or coincide with morphological changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cervical spinal cord of rats was irradiated with iso-effective photon or carbon (12C-)ion doses. Afterwards, animals underwent frequent DCE-MR imaging until they developed symptomatic radiation-induced myelopathy (paresis II). Measurements were performed at certain time points: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, and 6 months after irradiation, and when animals showed morphological (such as edema/syrinx/contrast agent (CA) accumulation) or neurological alterations (such as, paresis I, and paresis II). DCE-MRI data was analyzed using the extended Toft's model. RESULTS Fit quality improved with gradual disintegration of the blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) towards paresis II. Vascular permeability increased three months after photon irradiation, and rapidly escalated after animals showed MR-visible morphological changes until paresis II. After 12C-ion irradiation, vascular permeability increased when animals showed morphological alterations and increased further until animals had paresis II. The volume transfer constant and the plasma volume showed no significant changes. CONCLUSION Only after photon irradiation, DCE-MRI provides a temporal advantage in detecting early physiological signs in radiation-induced myelopathy compared to morphological MRI. As a generally lower level of vascular permeability after 12C-ions led to an earlier development of paresis as compared to photons, we conclude that other mechanisms dominate the development of paresis II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina L Bendinger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lifi Huang
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inna Babushkina
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Therapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christin Glowa
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Saager
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Horst F, Schardt D, Iwase H, Schuy C, Durante M, Weber U. Physical characterization of 3He ion beams for radiotherapy and comparison with 4He. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33730702 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abef88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
There is increasing interest in using helium ions for radiotherapy, complementary to protons and carbon ions. A large number of patients were treated with4He ions in the US heavy ion therapy project and novel4He ion treatment programs are under preparation, for instance in Germany and Japan.3He ions have been proposed as an alternative to4He ions because the acceleration of3He is technically less difficult than4He. In particular, beam contaminations have been pointed out as a potential safety issue for4He ion beams. This motivated a series of experiments with3He ion beams at Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Darmstadt. Measured3He Bragg curves and fragmentation data in water are presented in this work. Those experimental data are compared with FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations. The physical characteristics of3He ion beams are compared to those of4He, for which a large set of data became available in recent years from the preparation work at the Heidelberger Ionenstrahl-Therapiezentrum (HIT). The dose distributions (spread out Bragg peaks, lateral profiles) that can be achieved with3He ions are found to be competitive to4He dose distributions. The effect of beam contaminations on4He depth dose distribution is also addressed. It is concluded that3He ions can be a viable alternative to4He, especially for future compact therapy accelerator designs and upgrades of existing ion therapy facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Horst
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Dieter Schardt
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Hiroshi Iwase
- KEK, Radiation Science, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
| | - Christoph Schuy
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany.,Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Festkörperphysik, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Uli Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Welzel T, Bendinger AL, Glowa C, Babushkina I, Jugold M, Peschke P, Debus J, Karger CP, Saager M. Longitudinal MRI study after carbon ion and photon irradiation: shorter latency time for myelopathy is not associated with differential morphological changes. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:63. [PMID: 33789720 PMCID: PMC8011205 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01792-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced myelopathy is a severe and irreversible complication that occurs after a long symptom-free latency time if the spinal cord was exposed to a significant irradiation dose during tumor treatment. As carbon ions are increasingly investigated for tumor treatment in clinical trials, their effect on normal tissue needs further investigation to assure safety of patient treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible morphological alterations could serve as predictive markers for medicinal interventions to avoid severe side effects. Thus, MRI-visible morphological alterations in the rat spinal cord after high dose photon and carbon ion irradiation and their latency times were investigated. METHODS Rats whose spinal cords were irradiated with iso-effective high photon (n = 8) or carbon ion (n = 8) doses as well as sham-treated control animals (n = 6) underwent frequent MRI measurements until they developed radiation-induced myelopathy (paresis II). MR images were analyzed for morphological alterations and animals were regularly tested for neurological deficits. In addition, histological analysis was performed of animals suffering from paresis II compared to controls. RESULTS For both beam modalities, first morphological alterations occurred outside the spinal cord (bone marrow conversion, contrast agent accumulation in the musculature ventral and dorsal to the spinal cord) followed by morphological alterations inside the spinal cord (edema, syrinx, contrast agent accumulation) and eventually neurological alterations (paresis I and II). Latency times were significantly shorter after carbon ions as compared to photon irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation of the rat spinal cord with photon or carbon ion doses that lead to 100% myelopathy induced a comparable fixed sequence of MRI-visible morphological alterations and neurological distortions. However, at least in the animal model used in this study, the observed MRI-visible morphological alterations in the spinal cord are not suited as predictive markers to identify animals that will develop myelopathy as the time between MRI-visible alterations and the occurrence of myelopathy is too short to intervene with protective or mitigative drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Welzel
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alina L Bendinger
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christin Glowa
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inna Babushkina
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manfred Jugold
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Therapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Saager
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The RBE in ion beam radiotherapy: In vivo studies and clinical application. Z Med Phys 2021; 31:105-121. [PMID: 33568337 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Ion beams used for radiotherapy exhibit an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which depends on several physical treatment parameters as well as on biological factors of the irradiated tissues. While the RBE is an experimentally well-defined quantity, translation to patients is complex and requires radiobiological studies, dedicated models to calculate the RBE in treatment planning as well as strategies for dose prescription. Preclinical in vivo studies and analysis of clinical outcome are important to validate and refine RBE-models. This review describes the concept of the experimental and clinical RBE and explains the fundamental dependencies of the RBE based on in vitro experiments. The available preclinical in vivo studies on normal tissue and tumor RBE for ions heavier than protons are reviewed in the context of the historical and present development of ion beam radiotherapy. In addition, the role of in vivo RBE-values in the development and benchmarking of RBE-models as well as the transition of these models to clinical application are described. Finally, limitations in the translation of experimental RBE-values into clinical application and the direction of future research are discussed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Carbon Ion Radiobiology. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12103022. [PMID: 33080914 PMCID: PMC7603235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiotherapy with carbon ions has been used for over 20 years in Asia and Europe and is now planned in the USA. The physics advantages of carbon ions compared to X-rays are similar to those of protons, but their radiobiological features are quite distinct and may lead to a breakthrough in the treatment of some cancers characterized by high mortality. Abstract Radiotherapy using accelerated charged particles is rapidly growing worldwide. About 85% of the cancer patients receiving particle therapy are irradiated with protons, which have physical advantages compared to X-rays but a similar biological response. In addition to the ballistic advantages, heavy ions present specific radiobiological features that can make them attractive for treating radioresistant, hypoxic tumors. An ideal heavy ion should have lower toxicity in the entrance channel (normal tissue) and be exquisitely effective in the target region (tumor). Carbon ions have been chosen because they represent the best combination in this direction. Normal tissue toxicities and second cancer risk are similar to those observed in conventional radiotherapy. In the target region, they have increased relative biological effectiveness and a reduced oxygen enhancement ratio compared to X-rays. Some radiobiological properties of densely ionizing carbon ions are so distinct from X-rays and protons that they can be considered as a different “drug” in oncology, and may elicit favorable responses such as an increased immune response and reduced angiogenesis and metastatic potential. The radiobiological properties of carbon ions should guide patient selection and treatment protocols to achieve optimal clinical results.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jeong J, Taasti VT, Jackson A, Deasy JO. The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:265-271. [PMID: 32976878 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is recognized as an effective alternative treatment modality for early stage lung cancer, but a quantitative understanding of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) compared to photon therapy is lacking. In this work, a mechanistic tumor response model previously validated for lung photon radiotherapy was used to estimate the RBE of CIRT compared to photon radiotherapy, as a function of dose and the fractionation schedule. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical outcome data of 9 patient cohorts (394 patients) treated with CIRT for early stage lung cancer, representing all published data, were included. Fractional dose, number of fractions, treatment schedule, and local control rates were used for model simulations relative to standard photon outcomes. Four parameters were fitted: α, α/β, and the oxygen enhancement ratios of cells either accessing only glucose, not oxygen (OERI), or cells dying from starvation (OERH). The resulting dose-response relationship of CIRT was compared with the previously determined dose-response relationship of photon radiotherapy for lung cancer, and an RBE of CIRT was derived. RESULTS Best-fit CIRT parameters were: α = 1.12 Gy-1 [95%-CI: 0.97-1.26], α/β = 23.9 Gy [95%-CI: 8.9-38.9], and the oxygen induced radioresistance of hypoxic cell populations were characterized by OERI = 1.08 [95%-CI: 1.00-1.41] (cells lacking oxygen but not glucose), and OERH = 1.01 [95%-CI: 1.00-1.44] (cells lacking oxygen and glucose). Depending on dose and fractionation, the derived RBE ranges from 2.1 to 1.5, with decreasing values for larger fractional dose and fewer number of fractions. CONCLUSION Fitted radiobiological parameters were consistent with known carbon in vitro radiobiology, and the resulting dose-response curve well-fitted the reported data over a wide range of dose-fractionation schemes. The same model, with only a few fitted parameters of clear mechanistic meaning, thus synthesizes both photon radiotherapy and CIRT clinical experience with early stage lung tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeho Jeong
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - Vicki T Taasti
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Saager M, Hahn EW, Peschke P, Brons S, Huber PE, Debus J, Karger CP. Ramipril reduces incidence and prolongates latency time of radiation-induced rat myelopathy after photon and carbon ion irradiation. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:791-798. [PMID: 32657322 PMCID: PMC7482157 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) during radiotherapy may be ameliorative for treatment-related normal tissue damage, a pilot study was conducted with the clinically approved (ACE) inhibitor ramipril on the outcome of radiation-induced myelopathy in the rat cervical spinal cord model. Female Sprague Dawley rats were irradiated with single doses of either carbon ions (LET 45 keV/μm) at the center of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) or 6 MeV photons. The rats were randomly distributed into 4 experimental arms: (i) photons; (ii) photons + ramipril; (iii) carbon ions and (iv) carbon ions + ramipril. Ramipril administration (2 mg/kg/day) started directly after irradiation and was maintained during the entire follow-up. Complete dose-response curves were generated for the biological endpoint radiation-induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within an observation time of 300 days. Administration of ramipril reduced the rate of paralysis at high dose levels for photons and for the first time a similar finding for high-LET particles was demonstrated, which indicates that the effect of ramipril is independent from radiation quality. The reduced rate of myelopathy is accompanied by a general prolongation of latency time for photons and for carbon ions. Although the already clinical approved drug ramipril can be considered as a mitigator of radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in the central nervous system, further examinations of the underlying pathological mechanisms leading to radiation-induced myelopathy are necessary to increase and sustain its mitigative effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric W Hahn
- Preclinical Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Peschke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mein S, Klein C, Kopp B, Magro G, Harrabi S, Karger CP, Haberer T, Debus J, Abdollahi A, Dokic I, Mairani A. Assessment of RBE-Weighted Dose Models for Carbon Ion Therapy Toward Modernization of Clinical Practice at HIT: In Vitro, in Vivo, and in Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:779-791. [PMID: 32504659 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Present-day treatment planning in carbon ion therapy is conducted with assumptions for a limited number of tissue types and models for effective dose. Here, we comprehensively assess relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in carbon ion therapy and associated models toward the modernization of current clinical practice in effective dose calculation. METHODS Using 2 human (A549, H460) and 2 mouse (B16, Renca) tumor cell lines, clonogenic cell survival assay was performed for examination of changes in RBE along the full range of clinical-like spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) fields. Prediction power of the local effect model (LEM1 and LEM4) and the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) was assessed. Experimentation and analysis were carried out in the frame of a multidimensional end point study for clinically relevant ranges of physical dose (D), dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd), and base-line photon radio-sensitivity (α/β)x. Additionally, predictions were compared against previously reported RBE measurements in vivo and surveyed in patient cases. RESULTS RBE model prediction performance varied among the investigated perspectives, with mMKM prediction exhibiting superior agreement with measurements both in vitro and in vivo across the 3 investigated end points. LEM1 and LEM4 performed their best in the highest LET conditions but yielded overestimations and underestimations in low/midrange LET conditions, respectively, as demonstrated by comparison with measurements. Additionally, the analysis of patient treatment plans revealed substantial variability across the investigated models (±20%-30% uncertainty), largely dependent on the selected model and absolute values for input tissue parameters αx and βx. CONCLUSION RBE dependencies in vitro, in vivo, and in silico were investigated with respect to various clinically relevant end points in the context of tumor-specific tissue radio-sensitivity assignment and accurate RBE modeling. Discovered model trends and performances advocate upgrading current treatment planning schemes in carbon ion therapy and call for verification via clinical outcome analysis with large patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Carmen Klein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy, Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
In Vivo Validation of the BIANCA Biophysical Model: Benchmarking against Rat Spinal Cord RBE Data. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21113973. [PMID: 32492909 PMCID: PMC7312044 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Cancer ion therapy is constantly growing thanks to its increased precision and, for heavy ions, its increased biological effectiveness (RBE) with respect to conventional photon therapy. The complex dependence of RBE on many factors demands biophysical modeling. Up to now, only the Local Effect Model (LEM), the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM), and the "mixed-beam" model are used in clinics. (2) Methods: In this work, the BIANCA biophysical model, after extensive benchmarking in vitro, was applied to develop a database predicting cell survival for different ions, energies, and doses. Following interface with the FLUKA Monte Carlo transport code, for the first time, BIANCA was benchmarked against in vivo data obtained by C-ion or proton irradiation of the rat spinal cord. The latter is a well-established model for CNS (central nervous system) late effects, which, in turn, are the main dose-limiting factors for head-and-neck tumors. Furthermore, these data have been considered to validate the LEM version applied in clinics. (3) Results: Although further benchmarking is desirable, the agreement between simulations and data suggests that BIANCA can predict RBE for C-ion or proton treatment of head-and-neck tumors. In particular, the agreement with proton data may be relevant if the current assumption of a constant proton RBE of 1.1 is revised. (4) Conclusions: This work provides the basis for future benchmarking against patient data, as well as the development of other databases for specific tumor types and/or normal tissues.
Collapse
|
24
|
Liermann J, Shinoto M, Syed M, Debus J, Herfarth K, Naumann P. Carbon ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical data. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:145-150. [PMID: 32416281 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Despite all efforts, pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease. Only surgical resection offers a realistic chance of survival. But at diagnosis the majority of patients suffer from unresectable disease. Whereas guidelines clearly recommend systemic treatments in metastatic disease, data is limited to support a specific treatment option for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve treatment schemes addressing patients that suffer from unresectable pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapy, photon radiotherapy and combinations of both have shown improved local control rates but there is still a lack of evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit of photon radiotherapy if no surgical resection is achieved. Impressive results of Japanese Phase I/II-trials investigating carbon ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer attracted global attention. Several studies have been initiated to validate and intensify this promising issue. This review gives an overview of the evidence and current use of carbon ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Liermann
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation, Saga, Japan.
| | - Mustafa Syed
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beltran C, Schultz HL, Anand A, Merrell K. Radiation biology considerations of proton therapy for gastrointestinal cancers. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:225-230. [PMID: 32175125 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.06.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical enthusiasm for proton therapy (PT) is high, with an exponential increase in the number of centers offering treatment. Attraction for this charged particle therapy modality stems from the favorable proton dose distribution, with low radiation dose absorption on entry and maximum radiation deposition at the Bragg peak. The current clinical convention is to use a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) value of 1.1 in order to correct the physical dose relative to photon therapy (i.e., proton radiation is 10% more biologically effective then photon radiation). In recent years, concerns about the potential side effects of PT have emerged. Various studies and review articles have sought to better quantify the RBE of PT and shine some light on the complexity of this problem. Reduction in biologic hot spots of non-target tissue is paramount in proton radiation therapy (RT) planning as the primary benefit of proton RT is a reduction in organ at risk (OAR) irradiation. New and emerging clinical data is in support of variable proton biological effectiveness and demonstrate late toxicity, presumably associated with high biological dose, to OAR. Overall, PT has promise to treat many cancer sites with similar efficacy as conventional RT but with fewer acute and late toxicities. However, further knowledge of biologic effective dose and its impact on both cancer and adjacent OAR is paramount for effective and safe treatment of patients with PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Aman Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kenneth Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Scholz M. State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects of Ion Beam Therapy: Physical and Radiobiological Aspects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2935240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
27
|
Fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord: comparison of the relative biological effectiveness with predictions of the local effect model. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:6. [PMID: 31900185 PMCID: PMC6942289 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1439-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and α/β-values after fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord with varying linear energy transfer (LET) to benchmark RBE-model calculations. Material and methods The rat spinal cord was irradiated with 6 fractions of carbon ions at 6 positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP, LET: 16–99 keV/μm). TD50-values (dose at 50% complication probability) were determined from dose-response curves for the endpoint radiation induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within 300 days after irradiation. Based on TD50-values of 15 MV photons, RBE-values were calculated and adding previously published data, the LET and fractional dose-dependence of the RBE was used to benchmark the local effect model (LEM I and IV). Results At six fractions, TD50-values decreased from 39.1 ± 0.4 Gy at 16 keV/μm to 17.5 ± 0.3 Gy at 99 keV/μm and the RBE increased accordingly from 1.46 ± 0.05 to 3.26 ± 0.13. Experimental α/β-ratios ranged from 6.9 ± 1.1 Gy to 44.3 ± 7.2 Gy and increased strongly with LET. Including all available data, comparison with model-predictions revealed that (i) LEM IV agrees better in the SOBP, while LEM I fits better in the entrance region, (ii) LEM IV describes the slope of the RBE within the SOBP better than LEM I, and (iii) in contrast to the strong LET-dependence, the RBE-deviations depend only weakly on fractionation within the measured range. Conclusions This study extends the available RBE data base to significantly lower fractional doses and performes detailed tests of the RBE-models LEM I and IV. In this comparison, LEM IV agrees better with the experimental data in the SOBP than LEM I. While this could support a model replacement in treatment planning, careful dosimetric analysis is required for the individual patient to evaluate potential clinical consequences.
Collapse
|
28
|
Gillmann C, Jäkel O, Karger CP. RBE-weighted doses in target volumes of chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy: Comparison of local effect models I and IV. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:234-238. [PMID: 31522880 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To compare the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose distributions in the target volume of chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients when using two different versions of the local effect model (LEM I vs. IV) under identical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patient collective included 59 patients treated with 20 fractions of carbon ion radiotherapy for chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma of the skull base at the Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in 2002 and 2003. Prescribed doses to the planning target volume (PTV) were 60 (n = 49), 66 (n = 2) and 70 (n = 8) Gy (RBE). The original treatment plans that were initially biologically optimized with LEM I, were now recalculated using LEM IV based on the absorbed dose distributions. The resulting RBE-weighted dose distributions were quantitatively compared to assess the clinical impact of LEM IV relative to LEM I in the target volume. RESULTS LEM IV predicts 20-30 Gy (RBE) increased maximum doses as compared to LEM I, while minimum doses are decreased by 2-5 Gy (RBE). Population-based mean and median doses deviated by less than 2 Gy (RBE) between both models. CONCLUSIONS LEM I and LEM IV-based RBE-weighted doses in the target volume may be significantly different. Replacing the applied model in patient treatments may therefore lead to local over- or underdosages in the tumor. If LEM IV is to be tested clinically, comparisons of the RBE-weighted dose distributions of both models are required for the individual patients to assess whether the LEM IV-plan would also be acceptable and prescribed dose as well as clinical outcome data have to be carefully reassessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gillmann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rackwitz T, Debus J. Clinical applications of proton and carbon ion therapy. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:226-232. [PMID: 31451309 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of cancer patients with charged particles like proton and carbon ions landmarks a new era in high-precision medicine. This review aims to summarize the physical and biological advantages of charged particle beams over conventional photon irradiation, presents some highlights in the treatment of selected tumor entities, and gives an update on previous and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilmann Rackwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fossati P, Matsufuji N, Kamada T, Karger CP. Radiobiological issues in prospective carbon ion therapy trials. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1096-e1110. [PMID: 30421806 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is developing toward a versatile tool in radiotherapy; however, the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions in tumors and normal tissues with respect to photon irradiation has to be considered by mathematical models in treatment planning. As a consequence, dose prescription and definition of dose constraints are performed in terms of RBE weighted rather than absorbed dose. The RBE is a complex quantity, which depends on physical variables, such as dose and beam quality as well as on normal tissue- or tumor-specific factors. At present, three RBE models are employed in CIRT: (a) the mixed-beam model, (b) the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM), and (c) the local effect model. While the LEM is used in Europe, the other two models are employed in Japan, and unfortunately, the concepts of how the nominal RBE-weighted dose is determined and prescribed differ significantly between the European and Japanese centers complicating the comparison, transfer, and reproduction of clinical results. This has severe impact on the way treatments should be prescribed, recorded, and reported. This contribution reviews the concept of the clinical application of the different RBE models and the ongoing clinical CIRT trials in Japan and Europe. Limitations of the RBE models and the resulting radiobiological issues in clinical CIRT trials are discussed in the context of current clinical evidence and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Fossati
- Fondazione CNAO (Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica), Pavia, Italy.,European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Tadashi Kamada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Saager M, Peschke P, Brons S, Debus J, Karger CP. Determination of the proton RBE in the rat spinal cord: Is there an increase towards the end of the spread-out Bragg peak? Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:115-120. [PMID: 29573823 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons in the rat spinal cord as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS The rat cervical spinal cord was irradiated with single or two equal fractions (split doses) of protons at four positions (LET 1.4-5.5 keV/µm) along a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). From dose-response analysis, TD50- (dose at 50% effect probability) and RBE-values were derived using the endpoint of radiation-induced myelopathy. RESULTS Along the SOBP, the TD50-values decreased from 21.7 ± 0.3 Gy to 19.5 ± 0.5 Gy for single and from 32.3 ± 0.3 Gy to 27.9 ± 0.5 Gy for split doses. The corresponding RBE-values increased from 1.13 ± 0.04 to 1.26 ± 0.05 (single doses) and from 1.06 ± 0.02 to 1.23 ± 0.03 (split doses). CONCLUSIONS For the relative high fractional doses, the experimental RBE at the distal edge of the proton SOBP is moderately increased. The conventionally applied RBE of 1.1 appears to be valid for the mid-SOBP region, but the higher values occurring more distally could be of clinical significance, especially if critical structures are located in this area. Further in vivo studies at lower fractional doses are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Peschke
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gillmann C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Jäkel O, Karger CP. Dose-response curves for MRI-detected radiation-induced temporal lobe reactions in patients after proton and carbon ion therapy: Does the same RBE-weighted dose lead to the same biological effect? Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:109-114. [PMID: 29459152 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To derive the dose-response curve for temporal lobe reactions (TLRs) after proton therapy and to compare the resulting relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted tolerance doses based on an RBE of 1.1 with published values for carbon ions, which were calculated by the two versions of the local effect model (LEM I or IV). METHODS AND MATERIALS 62 patients treated with protons for skull base tumors were analyzed for TLRs using magnetic resonance imaging. Within the mean follow-up time of 38 months, TLRs were observed in six patients. Dose-response curves based on the RBE-weighted maximum dose, excluding the 1 cm3-volume with the highest dose, were derived and compared to previously published dose-response curves for carbon ions, which were obtained using LEM I or IV, respectively. RESULTS The dose-response curves for protons and LEM I were found to be almost identical while the curve of LEM IV was shifted toward higher doses. The resulting tolerance doses at the 5% effect level were 68.2+2.7-5.6, 68.6+3.0-3.9 and 78.3+3.8-5.0 Gy (RBE), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The RBE-weighted dose prescription for protons leads to the same RBE-weighted dose-response curve for TLR as the one for LEM I-based carbon ions, while LEM IV predicts clinically significant higher tolerance doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, PSI Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, PSI Villigen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Saager M, Peschke P, Welzel T, Huang L, Brons S, Grün R, Scholz M, Debus J, Karger CP. Late normal tissue response in the rat spinal cord after carbon ion irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:5. [PMID: 29325596 PMCID: PMC5765675 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0950-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The present work summarizes the research activities on radiation-induced late effects in the rat spinal cord carried out within the “clinical research group ion beam therapy” funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, KFO 214). Methods and materials Dose–response curves for the endpoint radiation-induced myelopathy were determined at 6 different positions (LET 16–99 keV/μm) within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak using either 1, 2 or 6 fractions of carbon ions. Based on the tolerance dose TD50 of carbon ions and photons, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was determined and compared with predictions of the local effect model (LEM I and IV). Within a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study the temporal development of radiation-induced changes in the spinal cord was characterized. To test the protective potential of the ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme)-inhibitor ramipril™, an additional dose–response experiment was performed. Results The RBE-values increased with LET and the increase was found to be larger for smaller fractional doses. Benchmarking the RBE-values as predicted by LEM I and LEM IV with the measured data revealed that LEM IV is more accurate in the high-LET, while LEM I is more accurate in the low-LET region. Characterization of the temporal development of radiation-induced changes with MRI demonstrated a shorter latency time for carbon ions, reflected on the histological level by an increased vessel perforation after carbon ion as compared to photon irradiations. For the ACE-inhibitor ramipril™, a mitigative rather than protective effect was found. Conclusions This comprehensive study established a large and consistent RBE data base for late effects in the rat spinal cord after carbon ion irradiation which will be further extended in ongoing studies. Using MRI, an extensive characterization of the temporal development of radiation-induced alterations was obtained. The reduced latency time for carbon ions is expected to originate from a dynamic interaction of various complex pathological processes. A dominant observation after carbon ion irradiation was an increase in vessel perforation preferentially in the white matter. To enable a targeted pharmacological intervention more details of the molecular pathways, responsible for the development of radiation-induced myelopathy are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Peschke
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lifi Huang
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Grün
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Carbon ion therapy is a promising evolving modality in radiotherapy to treat tumors that are radioresistant against photon treatments. As carbon ions are more effective in normal and tumor tissue, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) has to be calculated by bio-mathematical models and has to be considered in the dose prescription. This review (i) introduces the concept of the RBE and its most important determinants, (ii) describes the physical and biological causes of the increased RBE for carbon ions, (iii) summarizes available RBE measurements in vitro and in vivo, and (iv) describes the concepts of the clinically applied RBE models (mixed beam model, local effect model, and microdosimetric-kinetic model), and (v) the way they are introduced into clinical application as well as (vi) their status of experimental and clinical validation, and finally (vii) summarizes the current status of the use of the RBE concept in carbon ion therapy and points out clinically relevant conclusions as well as open questions. The RBE concept has proven to be a valuable concept for dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy, however, different centers use different RBE models and therefore care has to be taken when transferring results from one center to another. Experimental studies significantly improve the understanding of the dependencies and limitations of RBE models in clinical application. For the future, further studies investigating quantitatively the differential effects between normal tissues and tumors are needed accompanied by clinical studies on effectiveness and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Glowa C, Peschke P, Brons S, Neels OC, Kopka K, Debus J, Karger CP. Carbon ion radiotherapy: impact of tumor differentiation on local control in experimental prostate carcinomas. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:174. [PMID: 29121984 PMCID: PMC5679331 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0914-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To summarize the research activities of the “clinical research group heavy ion therapy”, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, KFO 214), on the impact of intrinsic tumor characteristics (grading, hypoxia) on local tumor control after carbon (12C-) ion- and photon irradiations. Methods Three sublines of syngeneic rat prostate tumors (R3327) with various differentiation levels (highly (-H), moderately (-HI) or anaplastic (-AT1), (diameter 10 mm) were irradiated with 1, 2 and 6 fractions of either 12C-ions or 6 MV photons using increasing dose levels. Primary endpoint was local tumor control at 300 days. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 12C-ions was calculated from TCD50-values (dose at 50% tumor control probability) of photons and 12C-ions and correlated with intrinsic tumor parameters. For the HI-subline, larger tumors (diameter 18 mm) were irradiated with either carbon ions, oxygen ions or photons under ambient as well as hypoxic conditions to determine the variability of the RBE under different oxygenation levels. In addition, imaging, histology and molecular analyses were performed to decipher the underlying mechanisms. Results Experimental results revealed (i) a smaller variation of the TCD50-values between the three tumor sublines for 12C-ions (23.6 - 32.9 Gy) than for photons (38.2 - 75.7 Gy), (ii) steeper dose-response curves for 12C-ions, and (iii) an RBE that increased with tumor grading (1.62 ± 0.11 (H) vs 2.08 ± 0.13 (HI) vs 2.30 ± 0.08 (AT1)). Large HI-tumors resulted in a marked increase of TCD50, which was increased further by 15% under hypoxic relative to oxic conditions. Noninvasive imaging, histology and molecular analyses identified hypoxia as an important radioresistance factor in photon therapy. Conclusions The dose-response studies revealed a higher efficacy of 12C-ions relative to photon therapy in the investigated syngeneic tumor model. Hypoxia turned out to be at least one important radioresistance factor, which can be partly overridden by high-LET ion beams. This might be used to increase treatment effectiveness also in patients. The results of this project served as a starting point for several ongoing research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Glowa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Peschke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver C Neels
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lühr A, von Neubeck C, Helmbrecht S, Baumann M, Enghardt W, Krause M. Modeling in vivo relative biological effectiveness in particle therapy for clinically relevant endpoints. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1392-1398. [PMID: 28849720 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1356468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of particle therapy compared to photon radiotherapy is known to be variable but the exact dependencies are still subject to debate. In vitro data suggested that RBE is to a large extend independent of ion type if parametrized by the beam quality Q. This study analyzed the RBE dependence of pre-clinical data on late toxicity with an emphasis on the beam quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS Published pre-clinical RBE dose-response data of the spinal cord following one and two fractions of photon and carbon ion irradiation were compiled. The beam quality for each treatment condition was obtained from Monte Carlo simulations. The αp and βp parameters of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model for particle irradiation were determined from the pre-clinical data and was provided as a function of Q. An introduced model proposed αp to increase linearly with Q and βp to remain constant. RBE values predicted by the model were compared to the published data. RESULTS The αp parameter was highly correlated with Q (R2 = 0.96) with a linear slope of 0.019 Gy-1. No significant variation of βp with Q was found. RBE and Q were also highly correlated (R2 = 0.98) for one and two fractions. The (extrapolated) RBE at Q = 0 (theoretical photon limit) for one and two fractions was 1.22 and significantly larger than 1 (p = .004). The model reproduced the dependence of RBE on fractionation well. CONCLUSIONS Fraction dose and beam quality Q were sufficient to describe the RBE variability for a late toxicity model within a carbon ion treatment field. Assuming the independence of the identified RBE parameters on the ion type might suggest the translation of variable (pre-) clinical RBE data from carbon ion to proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Lühr
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden ? Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Helmbrecht
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden ? Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Enghardt
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden ? Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden ? Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Saager M, Glowa C, Peschke P, Brons S, Grün R, Scholz M, Huber PE, Debus J, Karger CP. The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord increases linearly with LET up to 99 keV/μm. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:1512-1515. [PMID: 27827542 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1250947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christin Glowa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Grün
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- Department of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter E. Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P. Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Giovannini G, Böhlen T, Cabal G, Bauer J, Tessonnier T, Frey K, Debus J, Mairani A, Parodi K. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:68. [PMID: 27185038 PMCID: PMC4869317 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In proton radiation therapy a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is usually assumed. However, biological experiments have evidenced RBE dependencies on dose level, proton linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type. This work compares the predictions of three of the main radio-biological models proposed in the literature by Carabe-Fernandez, Wedenberg, Scholz and coworkers. Methods Using the chosen models, a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) as well as two exemplary clinical cases (single field and two fields) for cranial proton irradiation, all delivered with state-of-the-art pencil-beam scanning, have been analyzed in terms of absorbed dose, dose-averaged LET (LETD), RBE-weighted dose (DRBE) and biological range shift distributions. Results In the systematic comparison of RBE predictions by the three models we could show different levels of agreement depending on (α/β)x and LET values. The SOBP study emphasizes the variation of LETD and RBE not only as a function of depth but also of lateral distance from the central beam axis. Application to clinical-like scenario shows consistent discrepancies from the values obtained for a constant RBE of 1.1, when using a variable RBE scheme for proton irradiation in tissues with low (α/β)x, regardless of the model. Biological range shifts of 0.6– 2.4 mm (for high (α/β)x) and 3.0 – 5.4 mm (for low (α/β)x) were found from the fall-off analysis of individual profiles of RBE-weighted fraction dose along the beam penetration depth. Conclusions Although more experimental evidence is needed to validate the accuracy of the investigated models and their input parameters, their consistent trend suggests that their main RBE dependencies (dose, LET and (α/β)x) should be included in treatment planning systems. In particular, our results suggest that simpler models based on the linear-quadratic formalism and LETD might already be sufficient to reproduce important RBE dependencies for re-evaluation of plans optimized with the current RBE = 1.1 approximation. This approach would be a first step forward to consider RBE variations in proton therapy, thus enabling a more robust choice of biological dose delivery. The latter could in turn impact clinical outcome, especially in terms of reduced toxicities for tumors adjacent to organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Giovannini
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany.,University of Pavia, Department of Physics, Via Bassi 6, I-27100, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer, Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Böhlen
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany.,European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN, CH-1211, Geneva, 23, Switzerland.,Now with Medical Physics Division, EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie Curie-Straβe 5, Wiener Neustadt, A-2700, Austria
| | - Gonzalo Cabal
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer, Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer, Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Frey
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer, Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Medical Physics Unit, CNAO Foundation, Via Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Im Neuenheimer, Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Held KD, Kawamura H, Kaminuma T, Paz AES, Yoshida Y, Liu Q, Willers H, Takahashi A. Effects of Charged Particles on Human Tumor Cells. Front Oncol 2016; 6:23. [PMID: 26904502 PMCID: PMC4751258 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of charged particle therapy in cancer treatment is growing rapidly, in large part because the exquisite dose localization of charged particles allows for higher radiation doses to be given to tumor tissue while normal tissues are exposed to lower doses and decreased volumes of normal tissues are irradiated. In addition, charged particles heavier than protons have substantial potential clinical advantages because of their additional biological effects, including greater cell killing effectiveness, decreased radiation resistance of hypoxic cells in tumors, and reduced cell cycle dependence of radiation response. These biological advantages depend on many factors, such as endpoint, cell or tissue type, dose, dose rate or fractionation, charged particle type and energy, and oxygen concentration. This review summarizes the unique biological advantages of charged particle therapy and highlights recent research and areas of particular research needs, such as quantification of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for various tumor types and radiation qualities, role of genetic background of tumor cells in determining response to charged particles, sensitivity of cancer stem-like cells to charged particles, role of charged particles in tumors with hypoxic fractions, and importance of fractionation, including use of hypofractionation, with charged particles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Hidemasa Kawamura
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takuya Kaminuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | | | - Yukari Yoshida
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center , Gunma , Japan
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sørensen BS, Horsman MR, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Durante M, Scholz M, Friedrich T, Bassler N. Relative biological effectiveness of carbon ions for tumor control, acute skin damage and late radiation-induced fibrosis in a mouse model. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:1623-30. [PMID: 26271798 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1069890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to compare the biological effectiveness of carbon ions relative to x-rays between tumor control, acute skin reaction and late RIF of CDF1 mice. MATERIAL AND METHODS CDF1 mice with a C3H mouse mammary carcinoma implanted subcutaneously on the foot of the right hind limb were irradiated with single fractions of either photons, or (12)C ions using a 30-mm spread-out Bragg peak. The endpoint of the study was local control (no tumor recurrence within 90 days). For the acute skin reaction, non-tumor bearing CDF1 mice were irradiated with a comparable radiation scheme, and monitored for acute skin damage between Day 7 and 40. Late RIF was assessed in the irradiated mice. RESULTS The TCD50 (dose producing tumor control in 50% of mice) values with 95% confidence interval were 29.7 (25.4-34.8) Gy for C ions and 43.9 (39.2-49.2) Gy for photons, with a corresponding Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) value of 1.48 (1.28-1.72). For acute skin damage the MDD50 (dose to produce moist desquamation in 50% of mice) values with 95% confidence interval were 26.3 (23.0-30.1) Gy for C ions and 35.8 (32.9-39.0) Gy for photons, resulting in a RBE of 1.36 (1.20-1.54). For late radiation-induced fibrosis the FD50 (dose to produce severe fibrosis in 50% of mice) values with 95% confidence interval were 26.5 (23.1-30.3) Gy for carbon ions and 39.8 (37.8-41.8) Gy for photons, with a RBE of 1.50 (1.33-1.69). CONCLUSION The observed RBE values were very similar for tumor response, acute skin damage and late RIF when irradiated with large doses of high- linear energy transfer (LET) carbon ions. This study adds information to the variation in biological effectiveness in different tumor and normal tissue models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brita S Sørensen
- a Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Michael R Horsman
- a Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Jan Alsner
- a Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- a Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Marco Durante
- b GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Department of Biophysics , Darmstadt , Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- b GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Department of Biophysics , Darmstadt , Germany
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- b GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Department of Biophysics , Darmstadt , Germany
| | - Niels Bassler
- c Department of Physics , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 4:225-233. [PMID: 26366252 PMCID: PMC4559090 DOI: 10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, the biological equivalent dose (BED) that induces 50 % chance of RIM, by fitting data collected from published animal and patient studies. Methods RIM data from five rat studies; three large animal studies on monkeys, dogs, and pigs; and 18 patient studies were included for the investigation. The α/β ratios were derived, respectively, for rat (group A), large animal (group B), patient (group C), and combined data (group D). Results The α/β ratio (and its 95 % confidental interval) was 4.1 (3.2, 5.0) or 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) Gy for group A, depending on fitting algorithms. It was 3.9 (3.0, 4.8), 3.7 (2.2, 8.2) and 3.9 (3.0, 4.9) for groups B, C, and D, respectively. BED50 was 111 Gy for the combined data. It corresponds to a D50 of 73.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 19.0 Gy in single fraction. BED5, which is the BED to induce 5 % of RIM, was calculated to be 83.9 Gy. It corresponds to D5 of 55.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 16.2 Gy in single fraction. Conclusion The study showed that all four groups had similar α/β ratios close to 3.9 Gy, suggesting that the spinal cord has a similar fractionation effect for different species, including human beings.
Collapse
|
42
|
Saager M, Glowa C, Peschke P, Brons S, Grün R, Scholz M, Huber PE, Debus J, Karger CP. Split dose carbon ion irradiation of the rat spinal cord: Dependence of the relative biological effectiveness on dose and linear energy transfer. Radiother Oncol 2015. [PMID: 26197953 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To measure the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions relative to 15 MeV photons in the rat spinal cord for different linear energy transfers (LET) to validate model calculations. METHODS AND MATERIALS The cervical spinal cord of rats was irradiated with 2 fractions of carbon ions at six positions of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP, 16-99 keV/μm). TD50-values (dose at 50% complication probability) were determined from dose-response curves for the endpoint radiation induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within 300 days after irradiation. Using previously published TD50-values for photons (Karger et al., 2006; Debus et al., 2003), RBE-values were determined and compared with predictions of two versions of the local effect model (LEM I and IV). RESULTS TD50-values for paresis grade II were 26.7 ± 0.4 Gy (16 keV/μm), 24.0 ± 0.3 Gy (21 keV/μm), 22.5 ± 0.3 Gy (36 keV/μm), 20.1 ± 1.2 Gy (45 keV/μm), 17.7 ± 0.3 Gy (66 keV/μm), and 14.9 ± 0.3 Gy (99 keV/μm). RBE-values increased from 1.28 ± 0.03 (16 keV/μm) up to 2.30 ± 0.06 at 99 keV/μm. At the applied high fractional doses, LEM I fits best at 16 keV/μm and deviates progressively toward higher LETs while LEM IV agrees best at 99 keV/μm and shows increasing deviations, especially below 66 keV/μm. CONCLUSIONS The measured data improve the knowledge on the accuracy of RBE-calculations for carbon ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saager
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christin Glowa
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Peschke
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Grün
- Dept. of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Scholz
- Dept. of Biophysics, Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Dept. of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
In addition to the physical advantages (Bragg peak), the use of charged particles in cancer therapy can be associated with distinct biological effects compared to X-rays. While heavy ions (densely ionizing radiation) are known to have an energy- and charge-dependent increased Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), protons should not be very different from sparsely ionizing photons. A slightly increased biological effectiveness is taken into account in proton treatment planning by assuming a fixed RBE of 1.1 for the whole radiation field. However, data emerging from recent studies suggest that, for several end points of clinical relevance, the biological response is differentially modulated by protons compared to photons. In parallel, research in the field of medical physics highlighted how variations in RBE that are currently neglected might actually result in deposition of significant doses in healthy organs. This seems to be relevant in particular for normal tissues in the entrance region and for organs at risk close behind the tumor. All these aspects will be considered and discussed in this review, highlighting how a re-discussion of the role of a variable RBE in proton therapy might be well-timed.
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Carbon Ion Irradiation of the Rat Spinal Cord: Dependence of the Relative Biological Effectiveness on Linear Energy Transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:63-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
46
|
Karger CP, Scholz M, Huber PE, Debus J, Peschke P. Photon and carbon ion irradiation of a rat prostate carcinoma: does a higher fraction number increase the metastatic rate? Radiat Res 2014; 181:623-8. [PMID: 24844648 DOI: 10.1667/rr13611.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In a recent published study, we investigated the response of an experimental prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1) after irradiation with 1, 2 or 6 fractions of carbon ions or photons, respectively. The original intention of this study was to measure the dose-dependent local control probability as well as the related relative biological effectiveness of carbon ions. However, we now report an increased metastatic rate when the number of fractions was increased from 2 to 6. In a total of 246 animals, the actuarial metastatic rates for 1, 2 and 6 fractions were 5.1 ± 3.5%, 5.7 ± 4.0% and 15.3 ± 7.1% for photons and 9.8 ± 7.5%, 4.0 ± 3.9% and 20.3 ± 6.5% for carbon ions, respectively. The increase was significant only for carbon ions (6 vs. 2 fractions,P = 0.03). Although the original experiment was not designed to investigate metastatic rates, this observation may be of general interest to researchers studying radiation-modulated metastatic activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Karger
- a Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gillmann C, Jäkel O, Schlampp I, Karger CP. Temporal lobe reactions after carbon ion radiation therapy: comparison of relative biological effectiveness-weighted tolerance doses predicted by local effect models I and IV. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88:1136-41. [PMID: 24661667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2013] [Revised: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted tolerance doses for temporal lobe reactions after carbon ion radiation therapy using 2 different versions of the local effect model (LEM I vs LEM IV) for the same patient collective under identical conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS In a previous study, 59 patients were investigated, of whom 10 experienced temporal lobe reactions (TLR) after carbon ion radiation therapy for low-grade skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma at Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany in 2002 and 2003. TLR were detected as visible contrast enhancements on T1-weighted MRI images within a median follow-up time of 2.5 years. Although the derived RBE-weighted temporal lobe doses were based on the clinically applied LEM I, we have now recalculated the RBE-weighted dose distributions using LEM IV and derived dose-response curves with Dmax,V-1 cm³ (the RBE-weighted maximum dose in the remaining temporal lobe volume, excluding the volume of 1 cm³ with the highest dose) as an independent dosimetric variable. The resulting RBE-weighted tolerance doses were compared with those of the previous study to assess the clinical impact of LEM IV relative to LEM I. RESULTS The dose-response curve of LEM IV is shifted toward higher values compared to that of LEM I. The RBE-weighted tolerance dose for a 5% complication probability (TD5) increases from 68.8 ± 3.3 to 78.3 ± 4.3 Gy (RBE) for LEM IV as compared to LEM I. CONCLUSIONS LEM IV predicts a clinically significant increase of the RBE-weighted tolerance doses for the temporal lobe as compared to the currently applied LEM I. The limited available photon data do not allow a final conclusion as to whether RBE predictions of LEM I or LEM IV better fit better clinical experience in photon therapy. The decision about a future clinical application of LEM IV therefore requires additional analysis of temporal lobe reactions in a comparable photon-treated collective using the same dosimetric variable as in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gillmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Relative Biological Effectiveness of Carbon Ions in a Rat Prostate Carcinoma In Vivo: Comparison of 1, 2, and 6 Fractions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86:450-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2012] [Revised: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 01/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
49
|
Chanrion MA, Ammazzalorso F, Wittig A, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Jelen U. Dosimetric consequences of pencil beam width variations in scanned beam particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:3979-93. [PMID: 23685746 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/12/3979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Scanned ion beam delivery enables the highest degree of target dose conformation attainable in external beam radiotherapy. Nominal pencil beam widths (spot sizes) are recorded during treatment planning system commissioning. Due to changes in the beam-line optics, the actual spot sizes may differ from these commissioning values, leading to differences between planned and delivered dose. The purpose of this study was to analyse the dosimetric consequences of spot size variations in particle therapy treatment plans. For 12 patients with skull base tumours and 12 patients with prostate carcinoma, scanned-beam carbon ion and proton treatment plans were prepared and recomputed simulating spot size changes of (1) ±10% to simulate the typical magnitude of fluctuations, (2) ±25% representing the worst-case scenario and (3) ±50% as a part of a risk analysis in case of fault conditions. The primary effect of the spot size variation was a dose deterioration affecting the target edge: loss of target coverage and broadening of the lateral penumbra (increased spot size) or overdosage and contraction of the lateral penumbra (reduced spot size). For changes ≤25%, the resulting planning target volume mean 95%-isodose line coverage (CI-95%) deterioration was ranging from negligible to moderate. In some cases changes in the dose to adjoining critical structures were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Chanrion
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Böhlen TT, Brons S, Dosanjh M, Ferrari A, Fossati P, Haberer T, Patera V, Mairani A. Investigating the robustness of ion beam therapy treatment plans to uncertainties in biological treatment parameters. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:7983-8004. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|