Reduced neutron production through use of a flattening-filter-free accelerator

Effect of simultaneous integrated boost concepts on photoneutron and distant out-of-field doses in VMAT for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) may result in increased out-of-field (DOOF) and photoneutron (HPN) doses in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer (PCA). This work therefore aimed to compare DOOF and HPN in flattened (FLAT) and flattening filter-free (FFF) 6‑MV and 10-MV VMAT treatment plans with and without SIB.

METHODS

Eight groups of 30 VMAT plans for PCA with 6 MV or 10 MV, with or without FF and with uniform (2 Gy) or SIB target dose (2.5/3.0 Gy) prescriptions (CONV, SIB), were generated. All 240 plans were delivered on a slab-phantom and compared with respect to measured DOOF and HPN in 61.8 cm distance from the isocenter. The 6‑ and 10-MV flattened VMAT plans with conventional fractionation (6- and 10-MV FLAT CONV) served as standard reference groups. Doses were analyzed as a function of delivered monitor units (MU) and weighted equivalent square field size Aeq. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the presented quantities were determined.

RESULTS

The SIB plans resulted in decreased HPN over an entire prostate RT treatment course (10-MV SIB vs. CONV -38.2%). Omission of the flattening filter yielded less HPN (10-MV CONV -17.2%; 10-MV SIB -22.5%). The SIB decreased DOOF likewise by 39% for all given scenarios, while the FFF mode reduced DOOF on average by 60%. A strong Pearson correlation was found between MU and HPN (r > 0.9) as well as DOOF (0.7 < r < 0.9).

CONCLUSION

For a complete treatment, SIB reduces both photoneutron and OOF doses to almost the same extent as FFF deliveries. It is recommended to apply moderately hypofractionated 6‑MV SIB FFF-VMAT when considering photoneutron or OOF doses.

Dosimetric parameters calculation for 18 MV photon beam in flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) linear accelerators with and without magnetic deflector and lead filter

Dosimetric characteristics of the flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) modes of 18 MV therapeutic photon beam were investigated with and without the magnetic deflector (MD) and lead filter. MCNP version 6.1.0 Monte Carlo (MC) code was used to simulate the 18 MV photon beam of 2100 C/D-Varian linear accelerator (LINAC) for the FF and FFF modes. The MD (uniform magnetic flux density of 1 Tesla) and lead filter (thickness of 1 mm) were modeled to remove contaminant electrons. The dosimetric parameters for different scenarios of LINAC's head were calculated. Removing the flattening filter in the FFF mode increased the dose rate, electron contamination, skin dose, out-of-field dose, and un-flatness compared to the FF mode. While the lead filter decreased the contaminant electrons significantly, using the MD removed all secondary electrons from the beam line. The surface dose was decreased by 8.3% and 11.2% for the magnetic deflector (MD) and lead filter in the FF mode, respectively. The surface dose was decreased by 16.8% and 20.3% for the MD and lead filter scenarios in the FFF mode, respectively. The MD and lead filter decreased surface penumbra by 15.5% and 11.5% compared to the FFF mode. Removing the flattening filter from the LINAC's head improves most of the dosimetric characteristics of the 18MV therapeutic beam. The use of a lead filter and magnetic deflector preserves the skin-sparing property of megavoltage beams that deteriorate in FFF mode. However, using a magnetic deflector does not reduce photon fluence and dose rate.

Comparison and estimation of photoneutron dose produce between 10 MV flattened and unflattened beam in Elekta Versa HD™ medical linac

BACKGROUND

In a high-energy medical linear accelerator (linac), if the interaction of photon energy is higher than the neutron binding energy of high atomic material, it emits a neutron field through photonuclear (γ, n) reaction.

AIM

The current study, evaluates the photoneutron dose equivalent (PNDE) produced between the 10 MV flattened and unflattened beams as a function of field sizes in the Elekta Versa HD™ linac.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PNDE produced from Versa linac was recorded along the patient plane using the bubble detector personal neutron dosimeter and from the measured PNDE values, the theoretical PNDE values were simulated for various field sizes using nonlinear least-squares curve-fitting as a function of a polynomial. The percentage of deviation (PoD) and Chi-square (χ2) tests were performed between the measured and simulated PNDE values to study the reliability and validity.

RESULTS

The results show that the mean PoD between the measured and simulated PNDE values for respective positions of a field size of FF beam was found to be -1.99% for 0.3×0.3, -4.39% for 5×5, -3.868% for 10×10, 0.590% for 15×15, 9.18% for 20×20, -4.133% for 25×25, and 0.467% for 30×30 cm2. Similarly, the mean PoD between the measured and simulated PNDE values for flattening filter-free (FFF) beam was found to be 1.36% for 0.3×0.3, -1.39% for 5×5, -5.38% for 10×10, 4.41% for 15×15, 3.84% for 20×20, 5.69% for 25×25, and -1.75% for 30×30 cm2. The maximum deviation between the measured and simulated PNDE values lies within the range ± 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

From the study, it is observed that the FFF beam produces lesser neutron contamination than the FF beam.

Measurement of neutron yield for a medical linear accelerator below 10 MV

BACKGROUND

The recent trend toward 10 MV for volumetric radiotherapy treatment such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) introduces photoneutron production, with implications for non-therapeutic patient dose and additional shielding requirements for treatment room design. The sharply nonlinear drop-off in photoneutron production below 10 MV to negligible at 6 MV has scarcely been characterized quantitatively, yet can elucidate important practical insights.

PURPOSE

To measure photoneutron yields in a medical linac at 8 MV, which may strike a reasonable balance between usefully increased beam penetration and dose rate as compared to 6 MV while reducing photoneutron production which is present at 10 MV.

METHODS

A Varian iX linear accelerator undergoing decommissioning at our clinic was made to operate over a range of photon energies between 6 and 15 MV by calibrating the bending magnet and adjusting other beam generation parameters. Neutron dose within the treatment room was measured using an Anderson-Braun type detector over a continuum of intermediate energies.

RESULTS

The photoneutron production for energies below 10 MV was measured, adding to data that is otherwise scarce in the literature. Our results are consistent with previously published results for neutron yield. We found that the photoneutron production at 8 MV was about 1/10 of the value at 10 MV, and about 10 times higher than detector background at 6 MV.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoneutron production drops off below 10 MV, but is still present at 8 MV. An 8 MV beam is more penetrating than a 6 MV beam, and may offer a suitable tradeoff for modern radiotherapy techniques such as VMAT, SRS, and SABR. Further studies are needed to better understand the impact on treatment plan quality between 8 and 10 MV beams considering the benefits to facility requirements and non-therapeutic patient dose.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in craniospinal irradiation: a dosimetric analysis of acuros XB and analytical anisotropic algorithm comparing flattened and flattening filter-free beams with different energies

Aim:

To compare the dosimetric performance of flattening filter-free (FFF) beam and flattened beams (FBs) utilising volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) planning.

Materials and Methods:

Five medulloblastoma patients were randomly selected retrospectively and 40 plans were generated. The dose prescription to the planning target volume (PTV) was 36 Gy in 20 fractions. VMAT plans were created using 6 MV and 10 MV FB and FFF beam. Final dose calculations were performed using Acuros XB (AXB) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA). Dosimetric parameters such as D98%, D95%, D50%, V110%, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), low-grade dose index, high-grade dose index, dose to the organ at risks (OARs) and normal tissue mean dose were noted. The effect of low-dose volume on normal tissue was also analysed.

Results:

The 6 MV and 10 MV flattened and FFF beam plan generates similar target coverage, and a significant difference was observed in the HI and CI. FFF beam plan produces lower doses in some of the OARs as compared to FB. Significant differences were also noted in monitor unit (MU), body-PTV mean dose and low-dose spillage regions (1–10 Gy) outside the PTV. In our study, 6 MV and 10 MV FFF beam beams need 23–25% more MUs to achieve planning goals when compared to FBs. The increased MUs in FFF plan decreases the body-PTV mean dose (0·07–0·09 Gy in 6 MV FFF and 0·31 Gy in 10 MV FFF in both algorithms) when compared to FB plans.

Conclusion:

FFF beams generate a highly conformal and homogenous plan in CSI cases. FFF beam plan reduced the non-tumour dose and will aid in reducing the probability of second malignancies.

Technical Note: Induced radioactivity in stereotactic body radiation therapy with a flattening-filter-free 10 MV beam model

PURPOSE

The induced radioactivity in stereotactic body radiation therapy with a flattening-filter-free 10 MV beam model (10 FFF SBRT) was investigated for the risk to therapists.

METHODS

This study was performed on a Varian TrueBeam linac. The induced radioisotopes were identified by γ spectroscopy. The dose rate from the induced activity was measured for 12 treatment cycles in 4 h continuously. The impacts of the characteristic factors of 10 FFF SBRT on the dose rate were investigated, including monitor units (MU), beam rate, field size, and flattening filter. The dose rate was compared between the SBRT plans and conventional fractionation plans. A mathematical model was used to analyze the results and estimate the annual dose to therapists.

RESULTS

(a) The induced radioisotopes included ²⁴ Na, ²⁸ Al, ³⁸ Cl, ⁵⁶ Mn, ⁶⁶ Cu, ¹⁸⁷ W, and ¹⁹⁶ Au. (b) In 4 h, the total dose contribution ratios were more than 70% for ²⁸ Al, about 20% for ⁵⁶ Mn, and 10% for all other long-lived radioisotopes, combining doses at the isocenter and end of the treatment couch. (c) The dose rate showed a nonlinear growth with increasing MU and beam rate. The variation of the dose rate was complicated with the jaw field and not sensitive to the MLC field. The removal of the flattening filter reduced the dose rate by about 40%. The dose level of SBRT was two to three times that of conventional fractionation. (d) The estimated annual dose to therapists was up to 0.20 mSv/y.

CONCLUSIONS

The induced radioactivity in 10 FFF SBRT was higher compared with that in 10 MV conventional fractionation. More MU and higher beam rate were the primary factors that caused the increase. The therapists should wait longer after beam-off to reduce the occupational dose. In addition, aluminum and manganese should be less used in the treatment room.

Study of Photoneutron Production for the 18 MV Photon Beam of the Siemens Medical linac by Monte Carlo Simulation

Background:

Considering the importance of photoneutron production in linear accelerators, it is necessary to describe and measure the photoneutrons produced around modern linear accelerators.

Objective:

The aim of the present research is to study photoneutron production for the 18 MV photon beam of a Siemens Primus Plus medical linear accelerator.

Material and Methods:

This study is an experimental study. The main components of the head of Siemens Primus Plus linac were simulated using MCNPX 2.7.0 code. The contribution of different components of the linac in photoneutron production, neutron source strength, neutron source strength and photon and electron spectra were calculated for the flattening filter and flattening filter free cases for the 18 MV photon beam, and was scored for three fields of 5 × 5 cm², 10 × 10 cm² and 20 × 20 cm² in size.

Results:

The results show that the primary collimator has the largest contribution to production of neutrons. Moreover, the photon fluence for the flattening filter free case is 8.62, 6.51 and 4.62 times higher than the flattening filter case for the three fields, respectively. The electron fluences for the flattening filter free case are 4.62, 2.93 and 2.79 times higher than with flattening filter case for the three fields under study, respectively. In addition to these cases, by increasing the field size, the contribution of neutron production related to the jaws is reduced, so that when the field size increases from 5 × 5 cm² to 20 × 20 cm², a 17.93% decrease in photoneutron production was observed.

Conclusion:

In all of the accelerators, the neutron strength also increases with increasing energy. The calculated neutron strength was equal to 0.83×10¹² neutron Gy ⁻¹ at the isocenter.

Experimental determination of thermal neutron fluence around Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator for various photon energies

A complex neutron spectrum generated along with a useful photon beam imposes an additional radiation protection risk around medical linear accelerators (linac). The thermal neutron component of this complex neutron spectrum formed during different photon modes of operation of Elekta Versa HD linac has been quantified using Indium foil activation technique. The thermal neutron fluence (Φ _th ) at isocenter for 15 MV, 10 MV and 10 MV FFF beams was found to be 2.45 × 10⁵, 4.35 × 10⁴ and 3.2 × 10⁴ neutrons cm^-2 Gy^-1, respectively. The analysis shows a reduction in the Φ _th as the flattening filter is being taken out from the beam path. A negative correlation in Φ _th with respect to field size has been observed with an average 18% reduction in Φ _th per monitor units as field size changes from 10 cm × 10 cm to 40 cm × 40 cm. For particular field size and photon energy, Φ _th was found to be uniform across the patient plane. From the measured gamma ray spectrum inside the treatment room six major isotopes have been identified which were ¹²²Sb, ¹⁸⁷W, ⁸²Br, ⁵⁶Mn, ²⁴Na and ²⁸Al.

A Monte Carlo study of neutron contamination in presence of circular cones during stereotactic radiotherapy with 18 MV photon beams

High-energy photons are being used to treat different kinds of cancer, but it may increase the rate of secondary cancers due to the neutron contamination as well as over exposing of patients and medical staffs in radiation therapy Takam, Bezak, Marcu, and Yeoh, 2011, Radiation Research, 176, 508-520. Due to some difficulties in experimental measurements of neutron contamination, Monte Carlo method is an efficient tool to investigate dose parameters and characteristics in new techniques. The 18-MV photon beam of linac and circular cones have been simulated by MCNP5 code. Various parameters of photon and neutron including mean energy, flux, KERMA, the number of particles crossing a surface at a distance of 100 cm (SSD = 100 cm) as well as the change in photon and neutron spectrum as well as in intensity through the transmission in the circular collimators have been investigated. The results of this study show that the use of a circular collimator decreases neutron dose in the central axis, which is an advantage, but neutron contamination inducing small neutron dose is distributed all over the space. On the surface of phantom, photon dose rate is approximately equal to 3.41E7 (mGy/mA.min) for different collimators, but the neutron dose rate is 1.64E2 (mGy/ mA.min), 2.03E2 (mGy/ mA.min) and 2.52E2 (mGy/mA.min) for diameters of 12, 20 and 40 mm, respectively and it decreases by decreasing the diameter of the collimator. The neutron dose rate decreases from 9.68E7 and 9.74E7 (mGy/min.mA) for open field size 33 cm² and 55 cm² to 1.64E2 (mGy/min.mA), 2.02E2 (mGy/min.mA) and 2.52E2 (mGy/min.mA) for collimator diameter of 12 mm, 20 mm and 40 mm. It can be concluded that the use of circular collimators has an advantage of reducing neutron dose in the central axis. It should be mentioned that the off-axis neutron dose surrounding the collimator can be eliminated using an external neutron shield without perturbing the treatment field.

10-MV SBRT FFF IRRADIATION TECHNIQUE IS ASSOCIATED TO THE LOWEST PERIPHERAL DOSE: THE OUTCOME OF 142 TREATMENT PLANS FOR THE 10 MOST COMMON TUMOUR LOCATIONS

There is a growing interest in the combined use of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) with Flattening Filter Free (FFF) due to the high local control rates and reduced treatment times, compared to conventionally fractionated treatments. It has been suggested that they may also provide a better radiation protection to radiotherapy patients as a consequence of the expected decrease in peripheral doses. This work aims to determine this reduction in unattended out-of-field regions, where no CT information is available but an important percentage of second primary cancers occur. For that purpose, ten different cases suitable for SBRT were chosen. Thus, 142 different treatment plans including SBRT, as well as 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT (with standard fractionation) in low and high energies for Varian (FF and FFF), Siemens and Elekta machines were created. Then, photon and neutron peripheral dose in 14 organs were assessed and compared using two analytical models. For the prostate case, uncomplicated and cancer free control probability estimation was also carried out. As a general behavior, SBRT plans led to the lowest peripheral doses followed by 3D-CRT, VMAT and IMRT, in this order. Unflattened beams proved to be the most effective in reducing peripheral doses, especially for 10 MV. The obtained results suggest that FFF beams for SBRT with 10 MV represent the best compromise between dose delivery efficiency and peripheral dose reduction.

The effect of the flattening filter on photoneutron production at 10 MV in the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator

PURPOSE

Neutrons are an unavoidable by-product of high-energy radiation therapy treatments that deliver unwanted nontarget dose to patients. Use of flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams has been shown to significantly reduce photoneutron production per monitor unit (MU) of dose delivered. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the photoneutron production of the 10 MV and 10 MV FFF beams of the Varian TrueBeam^TM linear accelerator.

METHODS

Neutron fluence spectra were measured using a Nested Neutron Spectrometer^TM (NNS, Detec Inc., Gatineau, Canada). The ratios of neutron fluence and ambient dose equivalent for the 10 MV FFF beam relative to the 10 MV beam, dubbed FF-ratios (FFF/FF), were used to characterize the difference between the two beams. FF-ratios were compared under the following three conditions (a) per MU, at various locations in the treatment room, (b) per MU, with the linac jaws opened and closed, and (c) per electron striking the bremsstrahlung target, as opposed to per MU, at one location with the jaws closed.

RESULTS

On average, the neutron fluence for the 10 MV FFF beam was 37% lower per MU than the 10 MV beam (FF-ratio = 0.63). The FF-ratio in neutron fluence and ambient dose equivalent did not vary by much between different locations within the treatment room. However, the FF-ratio in neutron ambient dose equivalent was reduced significantly when the linac jaws were opened compared to closed, which implies that the jaws contribute more to the photoneutron spectrum of the 10 MV FFF beam than to the 10 MV beam. Finally, it was found that the 10 MV FFF beam produces more photoneutrons per electron striking the bremsstrahlung target than the 10 MV beam (FF-ratio = 2.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The photoneutron fluence per MU produced by the 10 MV FFF beam is 37% lower than the 10 MV beam of a Varian TrueBeam linac. Accordingly, a reduction in neutron dose received by patients is achieved through use of the unflattened beam, provided that treatment plans for each beam require approximately the same number of MU. It was found to be instructive to compare the photoneutron yield per source electron between the two beams as it helped provide an understanding of the physics underlying photoneutron production in both beams.

Safety and feasibility of prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and flattening filter free

OBJECTIVE

To investigate feasibility and safety of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the management of prostate cancer while employing MR/CT fusion for delineation, fiducial marker seeds for positioning and Varian RapidArc with flattening filter free (FFF) delivery.

METHODS

41 patients were treated for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer with initial prostate-specific antigen of ≤20 ng ml-1, Gleason score 6-7. Patients had MR/CT fusion for delineation of prostate ±seminal vesicles. CT/MR fusion images were used for delineation and planned using flattening filter free modality. Verification on treatment was cone beam CT imaging with fiducial markers for matching. Patients had Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring for genitourinary and gastointestinal symptoms at baseline, week 4, 10 and 18.

RESULTS

Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for all patients, all plans achieved the objective clinical target volume D99% ≥ 95%, and for planning target volume D95% ≥ 95%. Rectum dose constraints were met for 95.1% for V18 Gy ≤ 35%, 80% V28 Gy ≤ 10%. A total of 32 (78.0%) plans achieved all rectum dose constraints. Grade 1 acute genitourinary symptoms were 53.7% of patients at baseline, 90.2% [95% CI (76.8-97.3%)] (p = 0.0005) at treatment 5, falling to 78.0% (62.4-89.4%) at week 4, and 75.0% (58.8-87.3%) by week 10 and 52.5% (36.1-68.5%) (p = 1.00) at week 18. Acute gastrointestinal symptoms were 5% at baseline, 46.3% [95% CI (30.7-62.6%)] at treatment 5, week 4 43.9% [95% CI (28.5-60.3%)], week 10 25.0% (11.1-42.3%), and declined slightly by week 18 [-20.095% CI (12.7-41.2)] p = 0.039. Overall 75.6% (31/41) of patients experienced Grade 1-2 toxicity during or after treatment.

CONCLUSION

This planning and delivery technique is feasible, safe and efficient. A homogeneous dose can be delivered to prostate with confidence, whilst limiting high dose to nearby structures. The use of this technology can be applied safely within further randomized study protocols. Advances in knowledge: Multimodality imaging for delineation and linac-based image-guided RT with FFF for the treatment of prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Comparative Evaluation of a 6MV Flattened Beam and a Flattening Filter Free Beam for Carcinoma of Cervix – IMRT Planning Study

Purpose:

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan quality, beam on time and integral dose were compared using 6MV FB (Flattened Beam) and FFFB (Flattening filter free beam) for carcinoma of cervix.

Materials and Methods:

Ten patients with stage II–IIIB cervix cancer (Ca.Cx) were retrospectively identified from the department database. Target volume (TV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) cancer guidelines. Dose prescribed to planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Two plans (6MV FB IMRT and 6MV FFFB IMRT) were generated to achieve 95% of prescription dose to PTV and sparing OAR as per normal tissue guidelines. Numbers of beams and their orientations were the same for all plans. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), treatment monitor unit (MU), beam on time (BOT) and non-tumor integral dose (NTID) were chosen for comparison.

Results:

FFFB generated plans were clinically acceptable. There was a statistically significant difference among the FB IMRT and FFFB IMRT plans with respect to CI, HI, D50%, D2% in PTV coverage, bladder V50Gy, MU, mean NTID and non-tumor low dose volume.

Conclusions:

6MV flattened and flattening filter free photon beams produce comparable plans by IMRT. FFF beams allow time efficient treatment delivery and may help reduce the risk of secondary malignances in carcinoma cervix cases.

Technical Note: On the impact of the incident electron beam energy on the primary dose component of flattening filter free photon beams

PURPOSE

For commercially available linear accelerators (Linacs), the electron energies of flattening filter free (FFF) and flattened (FF) beams are either identical or the electron energy of the FFF beam is increased to match the percentage depth dose curve (PDD) of the FF beam (in reference geometry). This study focuses on the primary dose components of FFF beams for both kinds of settings, studied on the same Linac.

METHODS

The measurements were conducted on a VersaHD Linac (Elekta, Crawley, UK) for both FF and FFF beams with nominal energies of 6 and 10 MV. In the clinical setting of the VersaHD, the energy of FFFM (Matched) beams is set to match the PDDs of the FF beams. In contrast the incident electron beam of the FFFU beam was set to the same energy as for the FF beam. Half value layers (HVLs) and a dual parameter beam quality specifier (DPBQS) were determined.

RESULTS

For the 6 MV FFFM beam, HVL and DPBQS values were very similar compared to those of the 6 MV FF beam, while for the 10 MV FFFM and FF beams, only %dd(10)x and HVL values were comparable (differences below 1.5%). This shows that matching the PDD at one depth does not guarantee other beam quality dependent parameters to be matched. For FFFU beams, all investigated beam quality specifiers were significantly different compared to those for FF beams of the same nominal accelerator potential. The DPBQS of the 6 MV FF and FFFM beams was equal within the measurement uncertainty and was comparable to published data of a machine with similar TPR20,10 and %dd(10)x. In contrast to that, the DPBQS's two parameters of the 10 MV FFFM beam were substantially higher compared to those for the 10 MV FF beam.

CONCLUSIONS

PDD-matched FF and FFF beams of both nominal accelerator potentials were observed to have similar HVL values, indicating similarity of their primary dose components. Using the DPBQS revealed that the mean attenuation coefficient was found to be the same within the uncertainty of 0.8% for 6 MV FF and 6 MV FFFM beams, while for 10 MV beams, they differed by 6.4%. This shows that the DPBQS can provide a differentiation of photon beam characteristics that would remain hidden by the use of a single beam quality specifier, such as %dd(10)x or HVL.

Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans

This study investigated the dosimetric differences in treatment plans from flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams from the TrueBeam System. A total of 104 treatment plans with static (sliding window) intensity-modulated radiotherapy beams and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beams were generated for 15 patients involving three cancer sites. In general, the FFF beam provides similar target coverage as the flattened beam with improved dose sparing to organ-at-risk (OAR). Among all three cancer sites, the head and neck showed more important differences between the flattened beam and FFF beam. The maximum reduction of the FFF beam in the mean dose reached up to 2.82 Gy for larynx in head and neck case. Compared to the 6 MV flattened beam, the 10 MV FFF beam provided improved dose sparing to certain OARs, especially for VMAT cases. Thus, 10 MV FFF beam could be used to improve the treatment plan.

Re-irradiating spinal column metastases using IMRT and VMAT with and without flattening filter - a treatment planning study

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the flattening filter free (FFF) mode of a linear accelerator for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with in-field recurrence of vertebral metastases.

Methods

An Elekta Synergy Linac with Agility™ head is used to simulate the treatment of ten patients with locally recurrent spinal column metastases. Four plans were generated for each patient treating the vertebrae sparing the spinal cord: Dual arc VMAT and nine field step and shoot IMRT each with and without flattening filter. Plan quality was assessed considering target coverage and sparing of the spinal cord and normal tissue. All plans were verified by a 2D-ionisation-chamber-array, peripheral doses were measured and compared to calculations. Delivery times were measured and compared. The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Target coverage, homogeneity index and conformity index were comparable for both flat and flattening filter free beams. The volume of the spinal cord receiving the allowed maximum dose to keep the risk of radiation myelopathy at 0 % was at the same time significantly reduced to below the clinically relevant 1 ccm using FFF mode. In addition the mean dose deposited in the surrounding healthy tissue was significantly reduced in the FFF mode. All four techniques showed equally good gamma scores for plan verification. FFF plans required considerably more MU per fraction dose. Regardless of the large number of MU, out-of-field point dose was significantly lower for FFF plans, with an average reduction of 33 % and mean delivery time was significantly reduced by 22 % using FFF beams. When compared to IMRT FF, VMAT FFF offered even a reduction of 71 % in delivery time and 45 % in peripheral dose.

Conclusions

FFF plans showed a significant improvement in sparing of normal tissue and the spinal cord, keeping target coverage and homogeneity comparable. In addition, delivery times were significantly reduced for FFF treatments, minimizing intrafractional motion as well as strain for the patient. Shortest delivery times were achieved using VMAT FFF. For radiotherapy of spinal column metastases VMAT FFF may therefore be considered the preferable treatment option for the combination of Elekta Synergy Linacs and Oncentra® External Beam v4.5 treatment planning system.

[Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Small Lesions Applying A Flattening Filter Free Clinac]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

With the rapid development of technology, stereotactic radiotherapy has been widely used. In a cohort of medically operable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) survival rates "potentially equivalent to those of surgery" have been reported. Removing the field flattening filter, Clinac is capable of delivering dose rates much higher than conventional linac as well as reducing the treatment time. The goals of this work were to report safety and efficacy of SBRT treatment using a flattening filter-free model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with small lesions.

METHODS

From December 2011 to December 2013, 31 NSCLC patients who were T1-2N0M0, solitary pulmonary recurrence after surgery, and stage IV with oligo metastasis were enrolled, receiving SBRT treatment (60 Gy/8 f or 48 Gy/4 f) applying a flattening filter-free model.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional technique, flattening filter-free model shortened the treating time with equivalent target dose and normal tissue dose. The median follow-up time is 19.4 mo. The 1-yr local control, regional control, distant control, progression free survival and overall survival rates were 96.8%, 96.8%, 83.9%, 77.4% and 96.8%. The most common side effects were radiation pneumonitis (29% grade 1, 3.2% grade 2) and chest pain (12.9% grade 1, 6.5% grade 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of flattening filter-free model in SBRT for small lesions of NSCLC patients is safe and effective. Long time follow-up and additional studies are still needed to validate our conclusions.

Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom

AIM

To measure and compare the head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened and 6 MV flattened photon beam using a home-made designed mini phantom.

BACKGROUND

The head scatter factor (Sc) is one of the important parameters for MU calculation. There are multiple factors that influence the Sc values, like accelerator head, flattening filter, primary and secondary collimators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A columnar mini phantom was designed as recommended by AAPM Task Group 74 with high and low atomic number material for measurement of head scatter factors at 10 cm and d max dose water equivalent thickness.

RESULTS

The Sc values measured with high-Z are higher than the low-Z mini phantoms observed for both 6MV-FB and 7MV-UFB photon energies. Sc values of 7MV-UFB photon beams were smaller than those of the 6MV-FB photon beams (0.6-2.2% (Primus), 0.2-1.4% (Artiste) and 0.6-3.7% (Clinac iX (2300CD))) for field sizes ranging from 10 cm × 10 cm to 40 cm × 40 cm. The SSD had no influence on head scatter for both flattened and unflattened beams. The presence of wedge filters influences the Sc values. The collimator exchange effects showed that the opening of the upper jaw increases Sc irrespective of FF and FFF.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in Sc values measured for 6MV-FB and unflattened 7MV-UFB photon beams over the range of field sizes from 10 cm × 10 cm to 40 cm × 04 cm. Different results were obtained for measurements performed with low-Z and high-Z mini phantoms.

Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group

This report describes the current state of flattening filter‐free (FFF) radiotherapy beams implemented on conventional linear accelerators, and is aimed primarily at practicing medical physicists. The Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a writing group to assess FFF technology. The published literature on FFF technology was reviewed, along with technical specifications provided by vendors. Based on this information, supplemented by the clinical experience of the group members, consensus guidelines and recommendations for implementation of FFF technology were developed. Areas in need of further investigation were identified. Removing the flattening filter increases beam intensity, especially near the central axis. Increased intensity reduces treatment time, especially for high‐dose stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS). Furthermore, removing the flattening filter reduces out‐of‐field dose and improves beam modeling accuracy. FFF beams are advantageous for small field (e.g., SRS) treatments and are appropriate for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). For conventional 3D radiotherapy of large targets, FFF beams may be disadvantageous compared to flattened beams because of the heterogeneity of FFF beam across the target (unless modulation is employed). For any application, the nonflat beam characteristics and substantially higher dose rates require consideration during the commissioning and quality assurance processes relative to flattened beams, and the appropriate clinical use of the technology needs to be identified. Consideration also needs to be given to these unique characteristics when undertaking facility planning. Several areas still warrant further research and development. Recommendations pertinent to FFF technology, including acceptance testing, commissioning, quality assurance, radiation safety, and facility planning, are presented. Examples of clinical applications are provided. Several of the areas in which future research and development are needed are also indicated.

PACS number: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.N‐, 87.56.bc

Comparison of Head Scatter Factor for 6MV and 10MV flattened (FB) and Unflattened (FFF) Photon Beam using indigenously Designed Columnar Mini Phantom

To measure and compare the head scatter factor for flattened (FB) and unflattened (FFF) of 6MV and 10MV photon beam using indigenously designed mini phantom. A columnar mini phantom was designed as recommended by AAPM Task Group 74 with low and high atomic number materials at 10 cm (mini phantom) and at approximately twice the depth of maximum dose water equivalent thickness (brass build-up cap). Scatter in the accelerator (Sc) values of 6MV-FFF photon beams are lesser than that of the 6MV-FB photon beams (0.66-2.8%; Clinac iX, 2300CD) and (0.47-1.74%; True beam) for field sizes ranging from 10 × 10 cm² to 40 × 40 cm². Sc values of 10MV-FFF photon beams are lesser (0.61-2.19%; True beam) than that of the 10MV-FB photons beams for field sizes ranging from 10 × 10 cm² to 40 × 40 cm². The SSD had no influence on head scatter for both flattened and unflattened beams and irrespective of head design of the different linear accelerators. The presence of field shaping device influences the Sc values. The collimator exchange effect reveals that the opening of the upper jaw increases Sc irrespective of FB or FFF photon beams and different linear accelerators, and it is less significant in FFF beams. Sc values of 6MV-FB square field were in good agreement with that of AAPM, TG-74 published data for Varian (Clinac iX, 2300CD) accelerator. Our results confirm that the removal of flattening filter decreases in the head scatter factor compared to flattened beam. This could reduce the out-of-field dose in advanced treatment delivery techniques.

Feasibility of using nonflat photon beams for whole-breast irradiation with breath hold

Removing a flattening filter or replacing it with a thinner filter alters the characteristics of a photon beam, creating a forward peaked intensity profile to make the photon beam nonflat. This study is to investigate the feasibility of applying nonflat photon beams to the whole-breast irradiation with breath holds for a potential of delivery time reduction during the gated treatment. Photon beams of 6 MV with flat and nonflat intensity profiles were commissioned. Fifteen patients with early-stage breast cancer, who received whole-breast radiation without breathing control, were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, three plans were created using a commercial treatment planning system: (a) the clinically approved plan using forward planning method (FP); (b) a hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan where the flat beam open fields were combined with the nonflat beam IMRT fields using direct aperture optimization method (mixed DAO); (c) a hybrid IMRT plan where both open and IMRT fields were from nonflat beams using direct aperture optimization (nonflat DAO). All plans were prescribed for ≥ 95% of the breast volume receiving the prescription dose of 50 Gy (2.0 Gy per fraction). In comparison, all plans achieved a similar dosimetric coverage to the targeted volume. The average homogeneity index of the FP, mixed DAO, and nonflat DAO plans were 0.882 ± 0.024, 0.879 ± 0.023, and 0.867 ± 0.027, respectively. The average percentage volume of V105 was 57.66% ± 5.21%, 34.67% ± 4.91%, 41.64% ± 5.32% for the FP, mixed, and nonflat DAO plans, respectively. There was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) observed for the defined endpoint doses in organs at risk (OARs). In conclusion, both mixed DAO and nonflat DAO plans can achieve similar plan quality as the clinically approved FP plan, measured by plan homogeneity and endpoint doses to the ORAs. Nonflat beam plans may reduce treatment time in breath-hold treatment, especially for hypofractionated treatment.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung malignancies: preliminary toxicity results using a flattening filter-free linear accelerator operating at 2400 monitor units per minute

BACKGROUND

Flattening filter-free (FFF) linear accelerators (linacs) are capable of delivering dose rates more than 4-times higher than conventional linacs during SBRT treatments, causing some to speculate whether the higher dose rate leads to increased toxicity owing to radiobiological dose rate effects. Despite wide clinical use of this emerging technology, clinical toxicity data for FFF SBRT are lacking. In this retrospective study, we report the acute and late toxicities observed in our lung radiosurgery experience using a FFF linac operating at 2400 MU/min.

METHODS

We reviewed all flattening filter-free (FFF) lung SBRT cases treated at our institution from August 2010 through July 2012. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had at least one clinical assessment at least 30 days following SBRT. Pulmonary, cardiac, dermatologic, neurologic, and gastrointestinal treatment related toxicities were scored according to CTCAE version 4.0. Toxicity observed within 90 days of SBRT was categorized as acute, whereas toxicity observed more than 90 days from SBRT was categorized as late. Factors thought to influence risk of toxicity were examined to assess relationship to grade > =2 toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with >30 day follow up were eligible for inclusion. All patients were treated using 10 MV unflattened photons beams with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) inverse planning. Median SBRT dose was 48 Gy in 4 fractions (range: 30-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions). Six patients (9%) experienced > = grade 2 acute pulmonary toxicity; no non-pulmonary acute toxicities were observed. In a subset of 49 patients with greater than 90 day follow up (median 11.5 months), 11 pulmonary and three nerve related grade > =2 late toxicities were recorded. Pulmonary toxicities comprised six grade 2, three grade 3, and one each grade 4 and 5 events. Nerve related events were rare and included two cases of grade 2 chest wall pain and one grade 3 brachial plexopathy which spontaneously resolved. No grade > =2 late gastrointestinal, skin, or cardiac toxicities were observed. Tumor size, biologically effective dose (BED10, assuming α/β of 10), and tumor location (central vs peripheral) were not significantly associated with grade > =2 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early clinical experience, lung SBRT using a FFF linac operating at 2400 MU/min yields minimal acute toxicity. Preliminary results of late treatment related toxicity suggest reasonable rates of grade > =2 toxicities. Further assessment of late effects and confirmation of the clinical efficacy of FFF SBRT is warranted.

Equivalent-quality unflattened photon beam modeling, planning, and delivery

The clinical application of the flattening filter‐free photon beam (FFF) has enjoyed greater use due to its advantage of reduced treatment time because of the increased dose rate. Its unique beam characteristics, along with the very high‐dose rate, require a thorough knowledge of the capability and accuracy in FFF beam modeling, planning, and delivery. This work verifies the feasibility of modeling an equivalent quality unflattened photon beam (eqUF), and the dosimetric accuracy in eqUF beam planning and delivery. An eqUF beam with a beam quality equivalent to a conventional 6 MV photon beam with the filter in place (WF) was modeled for the Pinnacle³ TPS and the beam model quality was evaluated by gamma index test. Results showed that the eqUF beam modeling was similar to that of the WF beam, as the overall passing rate of the 2%/2mm gamma index test was 99.5% in the eqUF beam model and 96% in the WF beam model. Hypofractionated IMRT plans were then generated with the same constraints using both WF and eqUF beams, and the similarity was evaluated by DVH comparison and generalized 3D gamma index test. The WF and eqUF plans showed no clinically significant differences in DVH comparison and, on average >98% voxels passed the 3%/3mm 3D gamma index test. Dosimetric accuracy in gated phantom delivery was verified by ion chamber and film measurements. All ion chamber measurements at the isocenter were within 1% of calculated values and film measurements passed the 3mm/3% gamma index test with an overall passing rate >95% in the high‐dose and low‐gradient region in both WF and eqUF cases. Treatment plan quality assurance (QA), using either measurement‐based or independent calculation‐based methods of ten clinically treated eqUF IMRT plans were analyzed. In both methods, the point dose differences were all within 2% difference. In the relative 2D dose distribution comparison, >95% points were within 3% dose difference or 3 mm DTA.

PACS number: 87.55.kh

Flattening filter-free linac improves treatment delivery efficiency in stereotactic body radiation therapy

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) employs precision target tracking and image‐guidance techniques to deliver ablative doses of radiation to localized malignancies; however, treatment with conventional photon beams requires lengthy treatment and immobilization times. The use of flattening filter‐free (FFF) beams operating at higher dose rates can shorten beam‐on time, and we hypothesize that it will shorten overall treatment delivery time. A total of 111 lung and liver SBRT cases treated at our institution from July 2008 to July 2011 were reviewed and 99 cases with complete data were identified. Treatment delivery times for cases treated with a FFF linac versus a conventional dose rate linac were compared. The frequency and type of intrafraction image guidance was also collected and compared between groups. Three hundred and ninety‐one individual SBRT fractions from 99 treatment plans were examined; 36 plans were treated with a FFF linac. In the FFF cohort, the mean (± standard deviation) treatment time (time elapsed from beam‐on until treatment end) and patient's immobilization time (time from first alignment image until treatment end) was 11.44 (± 6.3) and 21.08 (± 6.8) minutes compared to 32.94 (± 14.8) and 47.05 (± 17.6) minutes for the conventional cohort (p<0.01 for all values). Intrafraction‐computed tomography (CT) was used more often in the conventional cohort (84% vs. 25%; p<0.05), but use of orthogonal X‐ray imaging remained the same (16% vs. 19%). For lung and liver SBRT, a FFF linac reduces treatment and immobilization time by more than 50% compared to a conventional linac. In addition, treatment with a FFF linac is associated with less physician‐ordered image guidance, which contributes to further improvement in treatment delivery efficiency.

PACS number: 87.55.‐x

Fidelity of dose delivery at high dose rate of volumetric modulated arc therapy in a truebeam linac with flattening filter free beams

The purpose of this study is to assess fidelity of radiation delivery between high and low dose rates of the flattening filter free (FFF) modes of a new all-digital design medical linear accelerator (Varian TrueBeam™), particularly for plans optimized for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Measurements were made for the two energies of flattening filter free photon beams with a Varian TrueBeam™ linac: 6 MV (6 XFFF) at 400 and 1400 MU/min, and 10 MV (10 XFFF) at 400 and 2400 MU/min. Data acquisition and analysis was performed with both ionization chambers and diode detector system Delta(4), for square radiation fields and for 8 VMAT treatment plans optimized for SBRT treatment of lung tumors. For the square fields, a percent dose difference between high and low dose rate of the order of 0.3-0.4% for both photon energies was seen with the ionization chambers, while the contribution to the difference from ion recombination was found to be negligible. For both the VMAT and square-field deliveries, the Delta(4) showed the same average percent dose difference between the two dose rates of ~0.8% and ~0.6% for 10 MV and 6 MV, respectively, with the lower dose rate values giving the greater measured dose compared to the high dose rate. Thus, the VMAT deliveries introduced negligible dose differences between high and low dose rate. Finally, reproducibility of dose measurements was good for both energies.

Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Flattening filter free (FFF) beams generated by medical linear accelerators have recently started to be used in radiotherapy clinical practice. Such beams present fundamental differences with respect to the standard filter flattened (FF) beams, making the generally used dosimetric parameters and definitions not always viable. The present study will propose possible definitions and suggestions for some dosimetric parameters for use in quality assurance of FFF beams generated by medical linacs in radiotherapy.

METHODS

The main characteristics of the photon beams have been analyzed using specific data generated by a Varian TrueBeam linac having both FFF and FF beams of 6 and 10 MV energy, respectively.

RESULTS

Definitions for dose profile parameters are suggested starting from the renormalization of the FFF with respect to the corresponding FF beam. From this point the flatness concept has been translated into one of "unflatness" and other definitions have been proposed, maintaining a strict parallelism between FFF and FF parameter concepts.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideas for quality controls used in establishing a quality assurance program when introducing FFF beams into the clinical environment are given here, keeping them similar to those used for standard FF beams. By following the suggestions in this report, the authors foresee that the introduction of FFF beams into a clinical radiotherapy environment will be as safe and well controlled as standard beam modalities using the existing guidelines.

Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation

The flattening filter free (FFF) X-rays can provide much higher dose rate at the treatment target compared to the conventional flattened X-rays. However, the substantial increase of dose rate for FFF beams may affect the ion recombination correction factor, which is required for accurate measurements using ionization chambers in clinical dosimetry. The purpose of this work is to investigate the ion recombination of three types of commonly used ion chambers (Farmer, PinPoint and plane-parallel) in the FFF photon radiation. Both 6 MV and 10 MV flattened and FFF beams were fully commissioned on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The ion recombination correction factor, P(ion), was determined using the two-voltage technique for a 0.6 cc Farmer chamber, a 0.015 cc PinPoint chamber, and a 0.02 cc parallel-plate chamber at different source-to-axis distances (SAD) in a solid water phantom or water tank phantom at a depth of 10 cm in a 10 × 10 cm(2) field. Good repeatability of measurements was demonstrated. Less than 1% difference in P(ion) between the flattened and FFF photons for all three ion chambers was observed. At a SAD of 100 cm and a depth of 10 cm for a 10 × 10 cm(2) field, P(ion) for the Farmer chamber was 1.004 and 1.008 for the 6 MV flattened and FFF beams, respectively. At the same setup using the Farmer chamber, P(ion) was 1.002 and 1.015 for the 10MV flattened and FFF beams, respectively. All P(ion) results for the Farmer, PinPoint, or parallel plate chamber in the 6 MV and 10 MV flattened and FFF beams were within 2% from the unity (1 ≤ P(ion) < 1.02). The P(ion) ratio of the FFF to flattened beams was 0.99~1.01 for both 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The ion recombination effect of the Farmer, PinPoint, and plane-parallel chamber in the FFF beams is not substantially different from that in the conventional flattened beams.

Beam properties and stability of a flattening-filter free 7 MV beam-an overview

PURPOSE

Several works have recently focused on flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams of linear accelerators of various companies (in particular, Varian and Elekta), but no overview as yet exists for the flattening-filter free 7XU beam (Siemens Artiste).

METHODS

Dosimetric properties of the 7XU beam were measured in May and September 2011. We present depth dose curves and beam profiles, output factors, and MLC transmission and assess the stability of the measurements. The 7XU beam was commissioned in the Pinnacle[superscript three] treatment planning system (TPS), and modeling results including the spectrum are presented.

RESULTS

The percent depth dose curve of the 7XU beam is similar to the flat 6X beam line, with a slightly smaller surface dose. The beam profiles show the characteristic shape of flattening-filter free beams, with deviations between measurements of generally less than 1%. The output factors of the 7XU beam decrease more slowly than for the 6X beam. The MLC transmission is comparable but slightly less for the 7XU beam. The 7XU beam can be adequately modeled by the Pinnacle[superscript three] TPS, with successful dosimetric verification. The spectrum of the 7XU beam has lower photon fluence up to approximately 2.5 MeV and higher fluence beyond, with a slightly higher mean energy.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7XU beam has been commissioned for clinical use after successful modeling, stability checks, and dosimetric verification.

Dosimetric properties of a beam quality-matched 6 MV unflattened photon beam

The purpose of this study was to report the characteristics of an equivalent quality unflattened (eqUF) photon beam in clinical implementation and to provide a generalized method to describe unflattened (UF) photon beam profiles. An unflattened photon beam with a beam quality equivalent to the corresponding flat 6 MV photon beam (WF) was obtained by removing the flattening filter from a Siemens ONCOR Avant‐Garde linear accelerator and adjusting the photon energy. A method independent from the WF beam profile was presented to describe UF beam profiles and other selected beam characteristics were examined. The short‐term beam stability was examined by dynamic beam profiles, recorded every 0.072 s in static and gated delivery, and the long‐term stability was evidenced by the five‐year clinical quality assurance records. The dose rate was raised fivefold using the eqUF beam. The depth of maximum dose (dmax) shifted 3 mm deeper, but the percent depth dose beyond dmax was very similar to that of the WF beam. The surface dose and out‐of‐field dose were lower, but the penumbra was slightly wider. The variation in head scatter and phantom scatter with changes in field size was smaller; the variation in the profile shape with change in depth was also smaller. The eqUF beam is stable 0.072 s after the beam is turned on, and the five‐year beam stability was comparable to that of the WF beam. A fivefold dose rate increase was observed in the eqUF beam with similar beam characteristics to other reported UF beam data except for a deeper dmax and a slightly wider penumbra. The initial and long‐term stability of the eqUF beam profile is on parity with the WF beam. The UF beam profile can be described in the generalized method independently without relying on the WF beam profile.

PACS number: 87.55.de

A modification of flattening filter free linac for IMRT

PURPOSE

This study investigates the benefits of a modified flattening filter free (FFF) linac over the standard (STD) linac equipped with the flattening filter. Energy and angular spread of the electron beam of the FFF linac were modified. Modification of FFF beam parameters is explored to maximize the monitor unit efficiency and to minimize the head scatter in IMRT delivery for large target volumes or targets lying away from the central axis.

METHODS

The EGSnrc code is used to model FFF and STD linacs and study basic beam properties for both linac types in various beam configurations. Increasing energy of FFF linac results in similar beam attenuation properties and maximized dose rate compared to STD linac. Matching beam attenuation properties allows a more direct exploration of beam flatness of FFF linac in regard to IMRT delivery, especially away from the central axis where the effective dose rate is considerably smaller than the one at the central axis. Flatness of open beam dose profile of FFF linac is improved by increasing the angular spread of the electron beam. The resulting dose rate within the treatment field and outside of the field (peripheral dose) are characterized and compared to the unmodified FFF and STD linacs,

RESULTS

In order to match beam penetration properties, the energy of FFF is adjusted from 6.5 to 8.0 MeV for small to medium field sizes and from 6.5 to 8.5 MeV for larger ones. Dose rate of FFF vs STD linac increased by a factor of 1.9 (6.5 MeV) and 3.4-4.1 (8.0-8.5 MeV). Adjusting the mean angular spread of the electron beam from 0 degrees to 5 degrees-10 degrees resulted in complete flattening of photon beam for field sizes between 10 x 10 cm2 and 15 x 15 cm2 and partial flattening for field sizes from 15 x 15 cm2 to 30 x 30 cm2. Values of angular spread > or =14 degrees are not recommended as they exceed the opening of the primary collimator, affecting the area at the edges of the field. FFF fields of sizes smaller than 6 x 6 cm2 are already flat and beam flattening is not necessary. Overall, the angular spread of 5 degrees-10 degrees is sufficient and can satisfactorily flatten open beam dose profiles even for larger field sizes. Increasing the electron beam angular spread amounts to a slight decrease of dose rate of FFF linac. However, for angular spread, 5 degrees-10 degrees dose rate factor of FFF vs STD is still about 1.6-2.6, depending on the field size (and the adjusted energy). Similarly, in case of peripheral dose, a moderate increase in dose can be observed for angular spread of 5 degrees-10 degrees and for field sizes 10 x 10 cm2 to 30 x 30 cm2. Lastly, beam flatness of not modified FFF linac can be conveniently described by an analytical function representing a ratio of STD vs FFF doses: 1 + b|r|(n).

CONCLUSIONS

A modified FFF beamline with increased energy and electron beam angular spread results in satisfactory flattened beam and high dose rate within the field. Peripheral dose remaining at similar (or smaller) level than that of STD linac for the same delivered dose within the treatment field.

Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams

PURPOSE

Flattening filters (FFs) have been considered as an integral part of the treatment head of a medical accelerator for more than 50 years. The reasons for the longstanding use are, however, historical ones. Advanced treatment techniques, such as stereotactic radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy have stimulated the interest in operating linear accelerators in a flattening filter free (FFF) mode. The current manuscript reviews treatment head physics of FFF beams, describes their characteristics and the resulting potential advantages in their medical use, and closes with an outlook.

METHODS

A number of dosimetric benefits have been determined for FFF beams, which range from increased dose rate and dose per pulse to favorable output ratio in-air variation with field size, reduced energy variation across the beam, and reduced leakage and out-of-field dose, respectively. Finally, the softer photon spectrum of unflattened beams has implications on imaging strategies and radiation protection.

RESULTS

The dosimetric characteristics of FFF beams have an effect on treatment delivery, patient comfort, dose calculation accuracy, beam matching, absorbed dose determination, treatment planning, machine specific quality assurance, imaging, and radiation protection. When considering conventional C-arm linacs in a FFF mode, more studies are needed to specify and quantify the clinical advantages, especially with respect to treatment plan quality and quality assurance.

CONCLUSIONS

New treatment units are already on the market that operate without a FF or can be operated in a dedicated clinical FFF mode. Due to the convincing arguments of removing the FF, it is expected that more vendors will offer dedicated treatment units for advanced photon beam therapy in the near future. Several aspects related to standardization, dosimetry, treatment planning, and optimization need to be addressed in more detail in order to facilitate the clinical implementation of unflattened beams.