1
|
Harmeling JX, Woerdeman LAE, Ozdemir E, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Janus CPM, Russell NS, Koppert LB, Krul IM, van Leeuwen FE, Mureau MAM. Surgical outcomes following breast reconstruction in patients with and without a history of chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre, matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2896-2905. [PMID: 37037583 PMCID: PMC10583922 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common treatment-related second malignancy among women with previous chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Little is known about the effects of this kind of radiotherapy on the outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR). This study compared adverse outcomes of BR after HL-related chest radiotherapy to matched controls. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, matched cohort study in two expert cancer centres in the Netherlands. BRs after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy in HL survivors who received chest radiotherapy were matched with BRs in nonirradiated patients without HL on age at mastectomy date, date of BR, and type of BR. The primary outcome was complication-related BR failure or conversion and secondary outcomes were complication-related re-operation, capsular contracture, major donor-site complications, and complication-related ICU admission. The authors analyzed all outcomes univariably using Fisher's exact tests and the authors assessed reconstruction failure, complication-related re-operation, and capsular contracture with multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounding and data clustering. RESULTS Seventy BRs in 41 patients who received chest radiotherapy for HL were matched to 121 BRs in 110 nonirradiated patients. Reconstruction failure did not differ between HL survivors (12.9%) and controls (12.4%). The comparison groups showed no differences in number of reoperations, major donor-site complications, or capsular contractures. BR in HL survivors more often let to ICU admission due to complications compared with controls ( P =0.048). CONCLUSIONS We observed no increased risk of adverse outcomes following BR after previous chest radiotherapy for HL. This is important information for counselling these patients and may improve shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ezgi Ozdemir
- Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cécile P M Janus
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam
| | | | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
| | - Inge M Krul
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eisenberg ER, Weiss A, Prakash I, Skamene S, Basik M, Boileau JF, Ajjamada L, Pollak MN, Wong SM. Surgical Management and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in Women with History of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Results from a Population-Based Cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6673-6680. [PMID: 35668306 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11947-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with history of chest irradiation for Hodgkin lymphoma are at increased risk of developing bilateral breast cancer, although contralateral breast cancer risk estimates in this population remain undefined. METHODS We queried the SEER database for women treated with radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma prior to age 30 years and were diagnosed with a subsequent breast cancer between 1990-2016. Trends in surgical management and the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of contralateral breast cancer were evaluated. RESULTS The cohort included 295 women with a median age of 22 years (range 8-30 years) at Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis, and 42 years (range 22-65 years) at breast cancer diagnosis. Overall, 263 (89.2%) presented with unilateral breast cancer, while 32 (10.8%) presented with synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 17.3% of patients, while mastectomy was performed in 82.7%. In 263 patients presenting with unilateral breast cancer, 50 (19.0%) underwent breast-conserving surgery and 213 (81.0%) underwent mastectomy. Subgroup analysis of mastectomy patients demonstrated a 40.5% bilateral mastectomy rate. The 5-year incidence of contralateral breast cancer in women who underwent unilateral surgery was 9.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-15.4%], increasing to 20.2% (95% CI, 13.7-29.2%) at 10-year and 29.9% (95% CI, 20.8-41.9%) at 15-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Women with a history of prior chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma with a diagnosis of breast cancer have a 10-year contralateral breast cancer risk of 20%. These findings support consideration of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy during surgical decision-making for management of this high-risk patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisheva R Eisenberg
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anna Weiss
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sonia Skamene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean Francois Boileau
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lissa Ajjamada
- Department of Hematology Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael N Pollak
- Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mathelin C, Barranger E, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boutet G, Brousse S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Coutant C, Daraï E, Delpech Y, Duraes M, Espié M, Fornecker L, Golfier F, Grosclaude P, Hamy AS, Kermarrec E, Lavoué V, Lodi M, Luporsi É, Maugard CM, Molière S, Seror JY, Taris N, Uzan C, Vaysse C, Fritel X. [Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2022; 50:107-120. [PMID: 34920167 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the value of performing a risk-reducting mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer. DESIGN The CNGOF Commission of Senology, composed of 26 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted. METHODS The Commission of Senology considered 8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, familial (no identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's disease) risk. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival. RESULTS The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). CONCLUSION There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practice for performing or not performing RRM in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Mathelin
- CHRU, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | | | | | - Gérard Boutet
- AGREGA, service de chirurgie gynécologique et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Susie Brousse
- CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France.
| | | | - Charles Coutant
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Yann Delpech
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - Martha Duraes
- CHU de Montpellier, 191, avenue du Doyen-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex, France.
| | - Marc Espié
- Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Luc Fornecker
- Département d'onco-hématologie, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - François Golfier
- Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, bâtiment 3B, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | | | | | - Edith Kermarrec
- Hôpital Tenon, service de radiologie, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- CHU, service de gynécologie, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France.
| | | | - Élisabeth Luporsi
- Oncologie médicale et oncogénétique, CHR Metz-Thionville, hôpital de Mercy, 1, allée du Château, 57085 Metz, France.
| | - Christine M Maugard
- Service de génétique oncologique clinique, unité de génétique oncologique moléculaire, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | | - Nicolas Taris
- Oncogénétique, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Charlotte Vaysse
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, CHU Toulouse, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France.
| | - Xavier Fritel
- Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taurin S, Alkhalifa H. Breast cancers, mammary stem cells, and cancer stem cells, characteristics, and hypotheses. Neoplasia 2020; 22:663-678. [PMID: 33142233 PMCID: PMC7586061 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The cellular heterogeneity of breast cancers still represents a major therapeutic challenge. The latest genomic studies have classified breast cancers in distinct clusters to inform the therapeutic approaches and predict clinical outcomes. The mammary epithelium is composed of luminal and basal cells, and this seemingly hierarchical organization is dependent on various stem cells and progenitors populating the mammary gland. Some cancer cells are conceptually similar to the stem cells as they can self-renew and generate bulk populations of nontumorigenic cells. Two models have been proposed to explain the cell of origin of breast cancer and involve either the reprogramming of differentiated mammary cells or the dysregulation of mammary stem cells or progenitors. Both hypotheses are not exclusive and imply the accumulation of independent mutational events. Cancer stem cells have been isolated from breast tumors and implicated in the development, metastasis, and recurrence of breast cancers. Recent advances in single-cell sequencing help deciphering the clonal evolution within each breast tumor. Still, few clinical trials have been focused on these specific cancer cell populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastien Taurin
- Department of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Princess Al-Jawhara Center for Molecular Medicine and Inherited Disorders, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
| | - Haifa Alkhalifa
- New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koo E, Henderson MA, Dwyer M, Skandarajah AR. Radiation-associated breast cancers in a late-effects cohort: Long-term surveillance is essential. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2020; 16:363-371. [PMID: 32894009 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adulthood malignancies have an increased risk of subsequent primary malignancies, particularly after exposure to therapeutic radiation. This study aims to evaluate the mode of surveillance and surveillance compliance, incidence and mode of detection of breast cancer, breast cancer phenotype, and outcomes after radiation-associated breast cancer (RBC) in a late-effects cohort. METHODS Women exposed to therapeutic radiation attending the late effects service from 1st January 2000 to 20th February 2013. All invasive and in-situ cancers, benign tumors, and deaths were evaluated. The incidence of breast cancer was compared to the Australian general population. Compliance with breast surveillance recommendations, clinicopathological features, and management of breast cancers were examined. RESULTS The prevalence of RBC was 17.1%. Twenty-eight cases of RBC occurred in 24 women, out of 140 women exposed to chest radiation. Patients whose first attendance was ≥15 years after radiation exposure experienced the highest incidence of RBC at 23%. The incidence of breast cancer was 11.2 times the general population (P < .001). Compliance with surveillance mammography was observed in 18.4%. Breast cancers diagnosed after the first attendance to the service were more likely screen-detected (P = .002). Most were hormone receptor positive (84.0%), invasive ductal carcinomas (82.1%), and managed with mastectomy (89.3%). CONCLUSIONS Patients attending a dedicated late effects service have a high burden of subsequent malignancies generally occurring after long latency. Judicious management with adherence to long-term surveillance guidelines is advocated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koo
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael A Henderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Dwyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita R Skandarajah
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Supiot S, Mahé MA, Oberlin O, Allodji R, Haddy N, Helfre S, Vigneron C, Brillaud-Meflah V, Bernier V, Laprie A, Ducassou A, Claude L, Diallo I, de Vathaire F. Clinical and histological features of second breast cancers following radiotherapy for childhood and young adult malignancy. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170824. [PMID: 29493262 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of early second breast cancer (SBC) among survivors of childhood and young adult malignancy treated with irradiation. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of women who presented with breast cancer aged 50 years or younger in nine French centers. RESULTS 121 patients and 141 SBC were analyzed (invasive = 130; non-invasive = 11). The mean age at first cancer diagnosis was 15 years and at initial SBC diagnosis was 38 years. Bilateral disease before the age of 51 years was diagnosed in 16% of the females. The majority of SBC were invasive carcinomas (92%). Among the invasive carcinomas, 39% had a histoprognostic score of III, 3.1% overexpressed HER2 and 29% were triple negative. The proportion of triple negative phenotype SBC was higher in patients older at first cancer diagnosis [RR = 1.2, 95% CI (1.1-1.3)]. 94% of triple negative SBCs developed in breast tissue which had received >20 Gy. CONCLUSION We found a high proportion of aggressive SBC following thoracic radiotherapy in childhood or early adulthood. Advances in knowledge: SBC screening is recommended by scientific societies for these child/young-adulthood cancer survivors in the same way as the one for high risk women because of constitutional mutations. Our results support these recommendations, not only because of a similar cumulative risk, but also because of the aggressive histological characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- 1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.,2 Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest , Saint-Herblain , France
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest , Saint-Herblain , France
| | - Odile Oberlin
- 4 Department of Pediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| | - Rodrigue Allodji
- 1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.,2 Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- 1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.,2 Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| | - Sylvie Helfre
- 5 Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie , Paris , France
| | - Céline Vigneron
- 6 Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Paul Strauss , Strasbourg , France
| | | | - Valérie Bernier
- 8 Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Alexis Vautrin , Nancy , France
| | | | | | | | - Ibrahim Diallo
- 1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.,2 Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- 1 CESP University. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay , Villejuif , France.,2 Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy , Villejuif , France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Breast Cancer in Lymphoma Survivors. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
9
|
Marmor S, Portschy PR, Burke EE, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM. Prognostic Factors for Metachronous Contralateral Breast Cancer: Implications for Management of the Contralateral Breast. Breast J 2016; 23:299-306. [PMID: 27988977 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The absolute number of breast cancer survivors who are at risk for metachronous contralateral breast cancer (mCBC) has dramatically increased. The objectives of this study were to identify factors predictive of survival for patients with mCBC and to determine clinicopathological factors predictive of advanced mCBC. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base, we identified women, ages 18-80, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1992 to 2010. We excluded patients with bilateral and stage IV primary breast cancer. Patients who developed mCBC ≥12 months from initial diagnosis were identified. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to determine survival of patients with mCBC. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine factors associated with advanced mCBC. We identified 6,673 patients who developed mCBC during our study period. The median interval between initial breast cancer and mCBC was 5 years. The strongest predictor of overall survival was the nodal status of the mCBC. Other significant prognostic factors included patient age; race; size, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, grade, and type of surgery of the initial breast cancer; grade of the mCBC; and use of radiation therapy for the mCBC. Overall, 25% of mCBCs were node positive. Younger age, black race, and characteristics of the initial breast cancer (increased size, invasive lobular histology, mastectomy treatment, and node-positivity) were significantly associated with node-positive mCBC (all p < 0.0.05). The most powerful predictor of survival for patients with mCBC is the nodal status of mCBC. Patients with advanced initial breast cancers are more likely to develop node-positive mCBC. Adherence to current surveillance and adjuvant therapy guidelines may minimize the risk and mortality of mCBCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Schelomo Marmor
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Pamela R Portschy
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erin E Burke
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Beth A Virnig
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Todd M Tuttle
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hodgson DC, Cotton C, Crystal P, Nathan PC. Impact of Early Breast Cancer Screening on Mortality Among Young Survivors of Childhood Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djw010. [DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Koo E, Henderson MA, Dwyer M, Skandarajah AR. Management and Prevention of Breast Cancer After Radiation to the Chest for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adulthood Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S545-51. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4596-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
12
|
Mills MD, Schulz RJ. Proton-beam therapy: are physicists ignoring clinical realities? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16:5710. [PMID: 26103506 PMCID: PMC5690119 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Mills
- University of Louisville 529 South Jackson Street Louisville, KY 40202 USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schellong G, Riepenhausen M, Ehlert K, Brämswig J, Dörffel W, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K, Bick U. Breast cancer in young women after treatment for Hodgkin's disease during childhood or adolescence--an observational study with up to 33-year follow-up. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2015; 111:3-9. [PMID: 24565270 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2013] [Revised: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of Hodgkin's disease (HD; also called Hodgkin's lymphoma) in children and adolescents with radiotherapy and chemotherapy leads to high survival rates but has a number of late effects. The most serious one is the development of a secondary malignant tumor, usually in the field that was irradiated. In women, breast cancer can arise in this way. METHOD Data on the occurrence of secondary breast cancer (sBC) were collected from 590 women who were treated in five consecutive pediatric HD treatment studies in the years 1978-1995 and then re-evaluated in a late follow-up study after a median interval of 17.8 years (maximum, 33.7 years). Information was obtained from 1999 onward by written inquiry to the participants and their treating physicians. The cumulative incidence of sBC was calculated by the Gooley method. RESULTS By July 2012, sBC had been diagnosed in 26 of 590 female HD patients; the breast cancer was in the irradiated field in 25 of these 26 patients. Their age at the time of treatment for HD was 9.9 to 16.2 years (the pubertal phase), and sBC was discovered with a median latency of 20.7 years after HD treatment (shortest latency, 14.3 years) and at a median age of 35.3 years (youngest age, 26.8 years). The radiation dose to the supradiaphragmatic fields ranged from 20 to 45 Gy. The cumulative incidence for sBC 30 years after treatment for HD was 19% (95% confidence interval, 12% to 29%). For women aged 25 to 45 in this series, the frequency of breast cancer was 24 times as high as in the corresponding normal population. CONCLUSION Women who were treated for HD in childhood or adolescence have an increased risk of developing breast cancer as young adults. The risk is associated with prior radiotherapy and with the age at which it was administered (the pubertal phase). Because of these findings, a structured breast cancer screening project for this high-risk group has been initiated in collaboration with the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Deutsches Konsortium für familiären Brust- und Eierstockkrebs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Schellong
- Children's Hospital - Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Münster
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Travis LB, Ng AK, Allan JM, Pui CH, Kennedy AR, Xu XG, Purdy JA, Applegate K, Yahalom J, Constine LS, Gilbert ES, Boice JD. Second malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease following radiotherapy. HEALTH PHYSICS 2014; 106:229-246. [PMID: 24378498 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are among the most serious and life-threatening late adverse effects experienced by the growing number of cancer survivors worldwide and are due in part to radiotherapy. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) convened an expert scientific committee to critically and comprehensively review associations between radiotherapy and SMNs and CVD, taking into account radiobiology; genomics; treatment (i.e., radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and other therapies); type of radiation; and quantitative considerations (i.e., dose-response relationships). Major conclusions of the NCRP include: (1) the relevance of older technologies for current risk assessment when organ-specific absorbed dose and the appropriate relative biological effectiveness are taken into account and (2) the identification of critical research needs with regard to newer radiation modalities, dose-response relationships, and genetic susceptibility. Recommendation for research priorities and infrastructural requirements include (1) long-term large-scale follow-up of extant cancer survivors and prospectively treated patients to characterize risks of SMNs and CVD in terms of radiation dose and type; (2) biological sample collection to integrate epidemiological studies with molecular and genetic evaluations; (3) investigation of interactions between radiotherapy and other potential confounding factors, such as age, sex, race, tobacco and alcohol use, dietary intake, energy balance, and other cofactors, as well as genetic susceptibility; (4) focusing on adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, given the sparse research in this population; and (5) construction of comprehensive risk prediction models for SMNs and CVD to permit the development of follow-up guidelines and prevention and intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lois B Travis
- *Rubin Center for Cancer Survivorship and Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; ‡Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; §Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; **Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; ††Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics Program, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY; ‡‡Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA; §§Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; ***Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; †††Division ofCancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; ‡‡‡National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, and the Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Who Is a Candidate and What Are the Outcomes? CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-013-0110-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
17
|
Braunstein S, Nakamura JL. Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features, pathobiology, and evolving approaches for mitigating risk. Front Oncol 2013; 3:73. [PMID: 23565507 PMCID: PMC3615242 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Accepted: 03/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the most significant effects of radiation therapy on normal tissues is mutagenesis, which is the basis for radiation-induced malignancies. Radiation-induced malignancies are late complications arising after radiotherapy, increasing in frequency among survivors of both pediatric and adult cancers. Genetic backgrounds harboring germline mutations in tumor suppressor genes are recognized risk factors. Some success has been found with using genome wide association studies to identify germline polymorphisms associated with susceptibility. The insights generated by genetics, epidemiology, and the development of experimental models are defining potential strategies to offer to individuals at risk for radiation-induced malignancies. Concurrent technological efforts are developing novel radiotherapy delivery to reduce irradiation of normal tissues, and thereby, to mitigate the risk of radiation-induced malignancies. The goal of this review is to discuss epidemiologic, modeling, and radiotherapy delivery data, where these lines of research intersect and their potential impact on patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jean L. Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Breast cancer surveillance in patients treated by radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2012; 118:401-14. [PMID: 22872454 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-012-0862-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2011] [Accepted: 09/26/2011] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The authors evaluated the relative risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer (BC) in women treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease (HD) and analysed the imaging features of these breast neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied 54 women who had all undergone radiotherapy between 1980 and 2010 (median age, 36.6 years). Women aged ≤30 years were screened with clinical breast examination, ultrasound (US) and, if necessary, mammography; women >30 years had clinical breast examination, US and mammography. Three women underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as well. RESULTS Mammography detected seven invasive breast cancers in 6/54 women (11.1%). Median age at diagnosis was 26.1 years for HD and 42.4 for breast cancer. Breast cancer was diagnosed following a median latent period from radiotherapy of 15.1 years. Mean radiation dose was 37.6 Gy in women who developed breast cancer and 31.3 Gy in the other women. CONCLUSIONS In our study, women who were exposed to radiation for HD had a 6.2-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer than the general population. In consideration of the young age and high breast density, women aged ≤30 years should be monitored by US and MR imaging; women aged >30 years should be monitored by US, mammography and, when necessary, MR imaging.
Collapse
|
19
|
Swerdlow AJ, Cooke R, Bates A, Cunningham D, Falk SJ, Gilson D, Hancock BW, Harris SJ, Horwich A, Hoskin PJ, Linch DC, Lister TA, Lucraft HH, Radford JA, Stevens AM, Syndikus I, Williams MV. Breast Cancer Risk After Supradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy for Hodgkin's Lymphoma in England and Wales: A National Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:2745-52. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.38.8835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate breast cancer risk after supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy administered to young women with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in a much larger cohort than previously to provide data for patient follow-up and screening individualized according to treatment type, age, and time point during follow-up. Patients and Methods Breast cancer risk was assessed in 5,002 women in England and Wales treated for HL with supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy at age < 36 years from 1956 to 2003, who underwent follow-up with 97% completeness until December 31, 2008. Results Breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ developed in 373 patients, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 5.0 (95% CI, 4.5 to 5.5). SIRs were greatest for those treated at age 14 years (47.2; 95% CI, 28.0 to 79.8) and continued to remain high for at least 40 years. The maximum absolute excess risk was at attained ages 50 to 59 years. Alkylating chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy diminished the risk, but only for women treated at age ≥ 20 years, not for those treated when younger. Cumulative risks were tabulated in detail; for 40-year follow-up, the risk for patients receiving ≥ 40 Gy mantle radiotherapy at young ages was 48%. Conclusion This article provides individualized risk estimates based on large numbers for patients with HL undergoing follow-up after radiotherapy at young ages. Follow-up of such women needs to continue for 40 years or longer and may require more-intensive screening regimens than those in national general population programs. Special consideration is needed of potential measures to reduce breast cancer risk for girls treated with supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy at pubertal ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Rosie Cooke
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Andrew Bates
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - David Cunningham
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Stephen J. Falk
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Dianne Gilson
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Barry W. Hancock
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Sarah J. Harris
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Alan Horwich
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Peter J. Hoskin
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - David C. Linch
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - T. Andrew Lister
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Helen H. Lucraft
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - John A. Radford
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Andrea M. Stevens
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Isabel Syndikus
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| | - Michael V. Williams
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rosie Cooke, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Andrew Bates, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Stephen J. Falk, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol; Dianne Gilson, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Sarah J. Harris, Guy's and St Thomas'; David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Peter J
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Omer B, Kadan-Lottick NS, Roberts KB, Wang R, Demsky C, Kupfer GM, Cooper D, Seropian S, Ma X. Patterns of subsequent malignancies after Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adults. Br J Haematol 2012; 158:615-25. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2012] [Accepted: 05/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rong Wang
- Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven; CT; USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ibrahim EM, Abouelkhair KM, Kazkaz GA, Elmasri OA, Al-Foheidi M. Risk of second breast cancer in female Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:197. [PMID: 22639888 PMCID: PMC3416585 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2011] [Accepted: 05/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) have an elevated risk of developing second breast cancer (SBC) compared with the general population. We planned this meta-analysis to quantify the long-term risk of SBC and analyze the contributing risk factors among HL survivors. METHODS According to predefined selection criteria, literature search identified 34 studies that were included in the analyses. RESULTS After eliminating overlapping or duplicate data, 957 incidences of SBC were encountered in 24,505 females with HL over a median follow-up of 14.9 years. The medians: age at the diagnosis of HL, age at diagnosis of SBC, and latency since HL treatment to the development of SBC were 23.7, 35.0, and 17.7 years, respectively. The pooled relative risk (RR) of SBC was 8.23 (95% CI, 5.43-12.47, I² = 96%), with a median absolute excess rate of 22.9 per 10,000 person-years. The RR was found inversely related to age at diagnosis of HL with the highest rate (68.7; [95%CI, 28.08-168.11], I² = 79%), occurred in young patients (≤ 15 years old), where the RR in older women (≥ 40 years old) was not significant (0.55; [95% CI, 0.09-3.52]). Analysis of RR by 5-year increments since the treatment of HL showed that the risk was highest after 15-19 years of latency (13.87; [95% CI, 7.91-24.30], I² = 89%). Analysis of the effect of treatment modalities showed that the RR rates were (4.70; [95% CI, 3.28-6.75], I² = 74%), (5.65; [95%CI, 2.94-10.88], I² = 91%), and (1.19; [95% CI, 0.50-2.82], I2 = 65%), for radiotherapy (RT) only, combined RT and chemotherapy (CT), and CT only, respectively. To investigate the demonstrated heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed when feasible. In most such analyses, the natural logarithm of RR was inversely associated with age at HL diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that, the current meta-analysis provided the most recent comprehensive estimate of the risk of SBC in a broad-range of HL survivors. Younger age at diagnosis proved to be a dominant risk factor. The obtained results would serve providing breast cancer screening recommendations for HL survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
- Oncology Center of Excellence, International Medical Center, PO Box 2172, Jeddah 21451, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Travis LB, Ng AK, Allan JM, Pui CH, Kennedy AR, Xu XG, Purdy JA, Applegate K, Yahalom J, Constine LS, Gilbert ES, Boice JD. Second malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease following radiotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104:357-70. [PMID: 22312134 PMCID: PMC3295744 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2011] [Revised: 11/21/2011] [Accepted: 11/30/2011] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are among the most serious and life-threatening late adverse effects experienced by the growing number of cancer survivors worldwide and are due in part to radiotherapy. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) convened an expert scientific committee to critically and comprehensively review associations between radiotherapy and SMNs and CVD, taking into account radiobiology; genomics; treatment (ie, radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and other therapies); type of radiation; and quantitative considerations (ie, dose-response relationships). Major conclusions of the NCRP include: 1) the relevance of older technologies for current risk assessment when organ-specific absorbed dose and the appropriate relative biological effectiveness are taken into account and 2) the identification of critical research needs with regard to newer radiation modalities, dose-response relationships, and genetic susceptibility. Recommendation for research priorities and infrastructural requirements include 1) long-term large-scale follow-up of extant cancer survivors and prospectively treated patients to characterize risks of SMNs and CVD in terms of radiation dose and type; 2) biological sample collection to integrate epidemiological studies with molecular and genetic evaluations; 3) investigation of interactions between radiotherapy and other potential confounding factors, such as age, sex, race, tobacco and alcohol use, dietary intake, energy balance, and other cofactors, as well as genetic susceptibility; 4) focusing on adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, given the sparse research in this population; and 5) construction of comprehensive risk prediction models for SMNs and CVD to permit the development of follow-up guidelines and prevention and intervention strategies.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Age of Onset
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology
- Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology
- Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology
- Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics
- Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control
- Child
- Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
- Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
- Female
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Heart Block/epidemiology
- Heart Block/etiology
- Humans
- Incidence
- Male
- Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology
- Myocardial Infarction/etiology
- Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/genetics
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/genetics
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/prevention & control
- Polymorphism, Genetic
- Radiotherapy/adverse effects
- Radiotherapy/methods
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects
- Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects
- Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Factors
- SEER Program
- Stroke/epidemiology
- Stroke/etiology
- Survivors/statistics & numerical data
- United States/epidemiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lois B Travis
- Rubin Center for Cancer Survivorship and Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, CU 420318, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Haberer S, Belin L, Le Scodan R, Kirova YM, Savignoni A, Stevens D, Moisson P, Decaudin D, Pierga JY, Reyal F, Campana F, Fourquet A, Bollet MA. [Breast conserving surgery in locoregional treatment of breast carcinoma after Hodgkin lymphoma]. Cancer Radiother 2012; 16:128-35. [PMID: 22341508 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2011] [Revised: 09/09/2011] [Accepted: 10/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report characteristics and outcome of breast cancer after irradiation for Hodgkin lymphoma with special focus on breast conservation surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records of 72 women who developed either ductal carcinoma in situ or stage I-III invasive carcinoma of the breast after Hodgkin lymphoma between 1978 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Median age at Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis was 23 years old. Median total dose received by the mediastinum was 40 Gy, mostly by a mantle field technique. Breast cancer occurred after a median time interval of 21 years. Ductal invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented respectively 71% and 19% of the cases. Locoregional treatment for breast cancer consisted of mastectomy with or without radiotherapy in 39 patients and of lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 patients. The isocentric lateral decubitus radiation technique was used in 17 patients after breast conserving surgery (57%). With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival rate and locoregional control rate were respectively 74.5% and 82% for invasive carcinoma and 100% and 92% for in situ carcinoma. Thirteen patients died of progressive breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer was diagnosed in ten patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS Breast conserving treatment can be an option for breast cancers that occur after Hodgkin lymphoma despite prior thoracic irradiation. It should consist of lumpectomy and adjuvant breast radiotherapy with use of adequate techniques, such as the lateral decubitus isocentric position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Haberer
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guillaume A, Morin B, Mathelin C. [Breast cancer after Hodgkin disease]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE 2012; 40:55-57. [PMID: 22192693 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2011] [Accepted: 09/27/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Secondary breast cancer represents 6 to 9% of secondary neoplasia after treatments for Hodgkin Disease (HD). Mostly, they appear 10 years after the end of treatments for HD. The most important risk factors are mantle field irradiation and the young age. The means of screening and treatments are still in discussion. We report a case of bilateral intraductal and invasive carcinoma that occurred 16 years after treatments for HD, developing its particularities in diagnosis and treatment, particularly place of conservative treatments and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy
- Female
- Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy
- Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy
- Humans
- Mastectomy
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy
- Postoperative Care
- Plastic Surgery Procedures
- Risk Factors
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Guillaume
- Unité de sénologie, pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHRU de Strasbourg, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Woodward E, Jessop M, Glaser A, Stark D. Late effects in survivors of teenage and young adult cancer: does age matter? Ann Oncol 2011; 22:2561-2568. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
26
|
Barbaro P, Johnston K, Dalla-Pozza L, Cohn R, Wang Y, Marshall G, Ziegler D. Reduced incidence of second solid tumors in survivors of childhood Hodgkin's lymphoma treated without radiation therapy. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:2569-2574. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, Cunningham D, Hancock BW, Horwich A, Hoskin PJ, Lister TA, Radford JA, Rohatiner AZ, Linch DC. Second Cancer Risk After Chemotherapy for Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Collaborative British Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:4096-104. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.34.8268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We investigated the long-term risk of second primary malignancy after chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in a much larger cohort than any yet published, to our knowledge. Patients and Methods We followed 5,798 patients with HL treated with chemotherapy in Britain from 1963 to 2001—of whom 3,432 also received radiotherapy—to assess second primary malignancy risks compared with general population-based expectations. Results Second malignancies occurred in 459 cohort members. Relative risk (RR) of second cancer was raised after chemotherapy alone (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7 to 2.4) but was much lower than after combined modalities (RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 3.5 to 4.4). After chemotherapy alone, there were significantly raised risks of lung cancer, non-HL, and leukemia, each contributing approximately equal absolute excess risk. After combined modalities, there were raised risks of these and several other cancers. Second cancer risk peaked 5 to 9 years after chemotherapy alone, but it remained raised for 25 years and longer after combined modalities. Risk was raised after each common chemotherapy regimen except, based on limited numbers and follow-up, adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. The age and time-course relations of lung cancer differed between chemotherapy alone and combined modalities. Conclusion Although chemotherapy alone leads to raised risk of second malignancy, this risk is lower and affects fewer anatomic sites than that after combined modalities, and it is slight if at all after 15 years follow-up. The mechanism of lung cancer etiology may differ between chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J. Swerdlow
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Craig D. Higgins
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Smith
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Cunningham
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Barry W. Hancock
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Horwich
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter J. Hoskin
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - T. Andrew Lister
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John A. Radford
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ama Z.S. Rohatiner
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David C. Linch
- Anthony J. Swerdlow, Craig D. Higgins, and Alan Horwich, Institute of Cancer Research; David Cunningham, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton; Paul Smith and David C. Linch, University College Hospital; T. Andrew Lister and Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London; Barry W. Hancock, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield; Peter J. Hoskin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex; and John A. Radford, Christie Hospital and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
There is an increasing recognition of the importance of genetic and familial cancer syndromes in routine clinical practice. Although most of gastrointestinal cancers are sporadic, a number of important cancer predisposition syndromes are now recognized and well characterized. In this review, we discuss some of the basic principles of clinical cancer genetics and clinically relevant aspects of the more common gastrointestinal cancer syndromes from the perspective of practicing radiation oncologists.
Collapse
|
29
|
Haberer S, Belin L, Le Scodan R, Kirova YM, Savignoni A, Stevens D, Moisson P, Decaudin D, Pierga JY, Reyal F, Campana F, Fourquet A, Bollet MA. Locoregional treatment for breast carcinoma after Hodgkin's lymphoma: the breast conservation option. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 82:e145-52. [PMID: 21605948 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2010] [Revised: 03/01/2011] [Accepted: 03/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcome of breast cancer (BC) after irradiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in women treated at the Institut Curie, with a special focus on the breast-conserving option. METHODS AND MATERIALS Medical records of 72 women who developed either ductal carcinoma in situ or Stage I-III invasive carcinoma of the breast after HL between 1978 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Median age at HL diagnosis was 23 years (range, 14-53 years). Median total dose received by the mediastinum was 40 Gy, mostly by a mantle-field technique. Breast cancers occurred after a median interval of 21 years (range, 5-40 years). Ductal invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented, respectively, 51 cases (71%) and 14 cases (19%). Invasive BCs consisted of 47 cT0-2 tumors (82%), 5 cN1-3 tumors (9%), and 20 Grade 3 tumors (35%). Locoregional treatment for BCs consisted of mastectomy with (3) or without (36) radiotherapy in 39 patients and lumpectomy with (30) or without (2) adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 patients. The isocentric lateral decubitus radiation technique was used in 17 patients after breast-conserving surgery (57%). With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival rate and locoregional control rate were, respectively, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 72-93%) for invasive carcinoma and 100% (95% CI, 100 -100%) and 92% (95% CI, 79-100%) for in situ carcinoma. In patients with invasive tumors, the 5-year distant disease-free survival rate was 79% (95% CI, 69-91%), and 13 patients died of progressive BC. Contralateral BC was diagnosed in 10 patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS Breast-conserving treatment can be an option for BCs that occur after HL, despite prior thoracic irradiation. It should consist of lumpectomy and adjuvant breast radiotherapy with use of adequate techniques, such as the lateral decubitus isocentric position, to protect the underlying heart and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Haberer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Elkin EB, Klem ML, Gonzales AM, Ishill NM, Hodgson D, Ng AK, Marks LB, Weidhaas J, Freedman GM, Miller RC, Constine LS, Myrehaug S, Yahalom J. Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer in women with and without a history of radiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a multi-institutional, matched cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2466-73. [PMID: 21576642 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.32.4079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer in women with and without a history of radiation therapy (RT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with breast cancer diagnosed from 1980 to 2006 after RT for HL were identified from eight North American hospitals and were matched three-to-one with patients with sporadic breast cancer by age, race, and year of breast cancer diagnosis. Information on patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes was abstracted from medical records. RESULTS A total of 253 patients with breast cancer with a history of RT for HL were matched with 741 patients with sporadic breast cancer. Median time from HL to breast cancer diagnosis was 18 years. Median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 42 years. Breast cancer after RT for HL was more likely to be detected by screening, was more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage, and was more likely to be bilateral at diagnosis. HL survivors had an increased risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 11.0) and death as a result of any cause (adjusted HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.3). Breast cancer-specific mortality was also elevated, but this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7 to 3.4). CONCLUSION In women with a history of RT for HL, breast cancer is diagnosed at an earlier stage, but these women are at greater risk for bilateral disease and are more likely to die as a result of causes other than breast cancer. Our findings support close follow-up for contralateral tumors in these patients and ongoing primary care to manage comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena B Elkin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kwong A, Wong CHN, Shea C, Suen DTK, Choi CLY. Choice of management of southern Chinese BRCA mutation carriers. World J Surg 2011; 34:1416-26. [PMID: 20182723 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0477-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mutations in the BRCA genes confer greater risk of developing breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Families carrying the mutation can have intensive surveillance and take preventative measures. This is the first report on the uptake of such interventions in Chinese mutation carriers residing in Asia. METHODS Breast and ovarian cancer index patients and family members referred for genetic counselling and testing who are found to carry the BRCA mutations were included in this multicenter study. RESULTS A total of 31 patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer were found to carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Forty-one tested family members also carried the mutations. Of the females, 85.7% of the index patients opted for breast surveillance and 23.8% for prophylactic mastectomy. Of the family members, 82.4% chose breast surveillance and 17.7% had prophylactic mastectomy. The majority of index patients and family members preferred ovarian surveillance (84 and 82.4%). Amongst the index patients, 32% decided for prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy; 17.6% of the family members who did not have history of ovarian cancer decided to have prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. All male index patients agreed to breast and prostate surveillance, including breast clinical examination and PSA monitoring. For those male family members found to be BRCA mutation carriers, 56.3% agreed to have breast surveillance and 66.7% agreed to have prostate surveillance. No index patient or family member agreed to any form of chemoprevention. CONCLUSIONS Chinese BRCA mutation carriers have a higher uptake of cancer surveillance than prophylactic surgery and have a lack of interest in the use of chemoprevention drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Kwong
- Division of Breast Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The treatment options for prostate cancer include prostatectomy, external-beam irradiation, brachytherapy, cryosurgery, focused ultrasound, hormonal therapy, watchful waiting, and various combinations of these modalities. Because the prostate abuts the bladder and rectum, the dose distributions of external-beam irradiations and the accuracy of their placement play crucial roles in the probability of tumor cure and the incidence of posttreatment complications. Principal among the newer radiation technologies is proton-beam therapy (PBT), whose dose distributions make it possible to deliver higher tumor doses and smaller doses to surrounding normal tissues than from x-ray systems. However, as the 10-year cause-specific survival for early-stage disease treated by radiation therapy now exceeds 90%, and with severe late toxicities in the range of 2% to 3%, randomized clinical trials provide the only means to demonstrate improved outcomes from PBT. Short of the data provided by such trials, the efficacy of PBT can be gleaned only from reports in the clinical literature, and, to date, these reports are equivocal. In view of the current health care crisis and the higher costs of PBT for prostate cancer, it is reasonable to assess the viability of this in-vogue but not-so-new technology.
Collapse
|
33
|
Nakamura JL, Phong C, Pinarbasi E, Kogan SC, Vandenberg S, Horvai AE, Faddegon BA, Fiedler D, Shokat K, Houseman BT, Chao R, Pieper RO, Shannon K. Dose-dependent effects of focal fractionated irradiation on secondary malignant neoplasms in Nf1 mutant mice. Cancer Res 2011; 71:106-15. [PMID: 21199799 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) are increasingly common complications of cancer therapy that have proven difficult to model in mice. Clinical observations suggest that the development of SMN correlates with radiation dose; however, this relationship has not been investigated systematically. We developed a novel procedure for administering fractionated cranial irradiation (CI) and investigated the incidence and spectrum of cancer in control and heterozygous Nf1 mutant mice irradiated to a moderate (15 Gy) or high dose (30 Gy). Heterozygous Nf1 inactivation cooperated with CI to induce solid tumors and myeloid malignancies, with mice developing many of the most common SMNs found in human patients. CI-induced malignancies segregated according to radiation dose as Nf1(+/-) mice developed predominately hematologic abnormalities after 15 Gy, whereas solid tumors predominated at 30 Gy, suggesting that radiation dose thresholds exist for hematologic and nonhematologic cancers. Genetic and biochemical studies revealed discrete patterns of somatic Nf1 and Trp53 inactivation and we observed hyperactive Ras signaling in many radiation-induced solid tumors. This technique for administering focal fractionated irradiation will facilitate mechanistic and translational studies of SMNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean L Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Milano MT, Li H, Gail MH, Constine LS, Travis LB. Long-term survival among patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed breast cancer: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:5088-96. [PMID: 20975072 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.29.5683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The increased risk of breast cancer (BC) among women receiving chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is well-established. However, there are no large population-based studies that describe overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) compared with women with first primary BC. METHODS For 298 HL survivors who developed BC (HL-BC group) and 405,223 women with a first or only BC (BC-1 group), actuarial OS and CSS were compared, accounting for age, BC stage, hormone receptor status, sociodemographic status, radiation for HL, and other variables. All patients were derived from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. RESULTS OS among patients with HL-BC was significantly inferior that of to patients with BC-1: 15-year OS was 48% versus 69% (P < .0001) for localized BC, and 33% versus 43% (P < .0001) for regional/distant BC. Patients with HL-BC had a significantly increased seven-fold risk (P < .0001) of death from other cancers (ie, not HL or BC) compared with patients with BC-1. Mortality from heart disease among patients with HL-BC with either localized or regional/distant disease was also significantly increased (hazard ratio = 2.22, P = .04; and hazard ratio = 4.28, P = .02, respectively) compared with patients with BC-1. Although 10-year BC-CSS was similar for patients with HL-BC and BC-1 with regional/distant disease, it was inferior for patients with localized BC (82% v 88%, respectively; P = .002). CONCLUSION Women with HL may survive a subsequent diagnosis of BC, only to experience significant excesses of death from other primary cancers and cardiac disease. Greater awareness of screening for cardiac disease and subsequent primary cancers in patients with HL-BC is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cella L, Liuzzi R, Magliulo M, Conson M, Camera L, Salvatore M, Pacelli R. Radiotherapy of large target volumes in Hodgkin's lymphoma: normal tissue sparing capability of forward IMRT versus conventional techniques. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5:33. [PMID: 20459790 PMCID: PMC2881006 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2010] [Accepted: 05/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This paper analyses normal tissue sparing capability of radiation treatment techniques in Hodgkin's lymphoma with large treatment volume. Methods 10 patients with supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's lymphoma and planning target volume (PTV) larger than 900 cm3 were evaluated. Two plans were simulated for each patient using 6 MV X-rays: a conventional multi-leaf (MLC) parallel-opposed (AP-PA) plan, and the same plan with additional MLC shaped segments (forward planned intensity modulated radiation therapy, FPIMRT). In order to compare plans, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of PTV, lungs, heart, spinal cord, breast, and thyroid were analyzed. The Inhomogeneity Coefficient (IC), the PTV receiving 95% of the prescription dose (V95), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and dose-volume parameters for the OARs were determined. Results the PTV coverage was improved (mean V95AP-PA = 95.9 and ICAP-PA = 0.4 vs. V95FPIMRT = 96.8 and ICFPIMRT = 0.31, p ≤ 0.05) by the FPIMRT technique compared to the conventional one. At the same time, NTCPs of lung, spinal cord and thyroid, and the volume of lung and thyroid receiving ≥ 30 Gy resulted significantly reduced when using the FPIMRT technique. Conclusions The FPIMRT technique can represent a very useful and, at the same time, simple method for improving PTV conformity while saving critical organs when large fields are needed as in Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cella
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages, National Council of Research (CNR), Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer. THE HUGO JOURNAL 2010; 3:63-76. [PMID: 20535403 PMCID: PMC2881322 DOI: 10.1007/s11568-010-9136-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2009] [Revised: 03/08/2010] [Accepted: 03/11/2010] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancers related to BRCA mutations are associated with particular biological features. Here we report the clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer in Chinese women with and without BRCA mutations and of carriers of BRCA1 mutations compared to BRCA2 mutations. Two hundred and 26 high-risk Hong Kong Chinese women were tested for BRCA mutations, medical information was obtained from medical records, and risk and demographic information was obtained from personal interviews. In this cohort, 28 (12.4%) women were BRCA mutation carriers and among these carriers, 39.3% were BRCA1 and 60.7% were BRCA2 mutations. Mutation carriers were more likely to have a familial history of breast and ovarian cancer, high-grade cancers, and triple negative (TN) cancers. Prevalence of TN was 48.3% in BRCA carriers and 25.6% in non-carriers and was 67.7% in BRCA1 and 35.3% in BRCA2 carriers. Estrogen receptor (ER) negative cancer was significantly associated with BRCA1 mutations, especially in those under 40 years of age. BRCA-related breast cancer in this Chinese population is associated with family history and adverse pathological/prognostic features, with BRCA2 mutations being more prevalent but BRCA1 carriers having more aggressive and TN cancers. Compared to Caucasian populations, prevalence of BRCA2 mutations and TN cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers in Chinese population are elevated.
Collapse
|
37
|
Adams MJ, Dozier A, Shore RE, Lipshultz SE, Schwartz RG, Constine LS, Pearson TA, Stovall M, Winters P, Fisher SG. Breast cancer risk 55+ years after irradiation for an enlarged thymus and its implications for early childhood medical irradiation today. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:48-58. [PMID: 20056622 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy during childhood increases long-term cancer risk, but the risk from radiation as a result of relatively higher dose diagnostic procedures remains less well known. This study, which evaluates breast cancer incidence in a cohort treated with "lower dose" chest radiotherapy over 50 years ago, can assist with estimating lifetime breast cancer risk in young children exposed to radiation from procedures such as chest computed tomography (CT) or treatment with recent "lower dose" chest radiotherapy protocols. METHODS A population-based, longitudinal cohort of subjects exposed to thymic irradiation during infancy from 1926 to 1957 and of their unexposed siblings was re-established. Previously followed until 1987, we resurveyed cohort members from 2004 to 2008. Poisson regression models compared breast cancer incidence rates between women in the cohort by treatment and dose category groups. RESULTS Breast cancer occurred in 96 treated (mean breast dose, 0.71 Gy) and 57 untreated women during 159,459 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for attained age and treatment/birth cohort, the rate ratio was 3.01 (2.18-4.21). The adjusted excess relative risk per Gy was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.86). Traditional breast cancer risk factors did not contribute significantly to multivariate model fit. CONCLUSION Our results show that at radiation doses between those received by the breast from chest CT and cancer therapy during early childhood, breast cancer incidence rates remain elevated >50 years after exposure. This implies that increased breast cancer risk will remain a lifelong concern in females treated during childhood with currently reduced radiotherapy doses and for infants receiving multiple chest CTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jacob Adams
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 644, Rochester, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Weber DC, Peguret N, Dipasquale G, Cozzi L. Involved-node and involved-field volumetric modulated arc vs. fixed beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy for female patients with early-stage supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a comparative planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:1578-86. [PMID: 19596171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2009] [Revised: 05/08/2009] [Accepted: 05/11/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A comparative treatment planning study was performed to compare volumetric-modulated arc (RA) to conventional intensity modulated (IMRT) for involved-field (IFRT) and involved-node (INRT) radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS AND MATERIALS Plans for 10 early-stage HL female patients were computed for RA and IMRT. First, the planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OAR) dose deposition was assessed between the two modalities. Second, the OAR (lung, breast, heart, thyroid, and submandibular gland) dose-volume histograms were computed and compared for IFRT and INRT, respectively. RESULTS For IFRT and INRT, PTV coverage was equally homogeneous with both RA and IMRT. By and large, the OAR irradiation with IFRT planning was not significantly different between RA and IMRT. For INRT, doses computed for RA were, however, usually lower than those with IMRT, particularly so for the lung, breast, and thyroid. Regardless of RA and IMRT modalities, a significant 20-50% decrease of the OAR computed mean doses was observed with INRT when compared with IFRT (Breast D(Mean) 1.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.6 +/- 1.7 Gy, p < 0.01 and 1.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 1.9 Gy, p < 0.01 for RA and IMRT, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RA and IMRT results in similar level of dose homogeneity. With INRT but not IFRT planning, the computed doses to the PTV and OAR were usually higher and lower with RA when compared to IMRT. Regardless of the treatment modality, INRT when compared with IFRT planning led to a significant decrease in OAR doses, particularly so for the breast and heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien C Weber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|