Atlas Based Auto-segmentation of CT Images: Clinical Evaluation of using Auto-contouring in High-dose, High-precision Radiotherapy of Cancer in the Head and Neck

OrbitNet-A fully automated orbit multi-organ segmentation model based on transformer in CT images

The delineation of orbital organs is a vital step in orbital diseases diagnosis and preoperative planning. However, an accurate multi-organ segmentation is still a clinical problem which suffers from two limitations. First, the contrast of soft tissue is relatively low. It usually cannot clearly show the boundaries of organs. Second, the optic nerve and the rectus muscle are difficult to distinguish because they are spatially adjacent and have similar geometry. To address these challenges, we propose the OrbitNet model to automatically segment orbital organs in CT images. Specifically, we present a global feature extraction module based on the transformer architecture called FocusTrans encoder, which enhance the ability to extract boundary features. To make the network focus on the extraction of edge features in the optic nerve and rectus muscle, the SA block is used to replace the convolution block in the decoding stage. In addition, we use the structural similarity measure (SSIM) loss as a part of the hybrid loss function to learn the edge differences of the organs better. OrbitNet has been trained and tested on the CT dataset collected by the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The experimental results show that our proposed model achieved superior results. The average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) is 83.9%, the value of average 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) is 1.62 mm, and the value of average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) is 0.47 mm. Our model also has good performance on the MICCAI 2015 challenge dataset.

Comparison of atlas-based and deep learning methods for organs at risk delineation on head-and-neck CT images using an automated treatment planning system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of head-and-neck (HN) organs-at-risk (OAR) automatic segmentation (AS) using four atlas-based (ABAS) and two deep learning (DL) solutions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients underwent iodine contrast-enhanced planning CT. Fourteen OAR were manually delineated. DL.1 and DL.2 solutions were trained with 63 mono-centric patients and > 1000 multi-centric patients, respectively. Ten and 15 patients with varied anatomies were selected for the atlas library and for testing, respectively. The evaluation was based on geometric indices (DICE coefficient and 95th percentile-Hausdorff Distance (HD_95%)), time needed for manual corrections and clinical dosimetric endpoints obtained using automated treatment planning.

RESULTS

Both DICE and HD_95% results indicated that DL algorithms generally performed better compared with ABAS algorithms for automatic segmentation of HN OAR. However, the hybrid-ABAS (ABAS.3) algorithm sometimes provided the highest agreement to the reference contours compared with the 2 DL. Compared with DL.2 and ABAS.3, DL.1 contours were the fastest to correct. For the 3 solutions, the differences in dose distributions obtained using AS contours and AS + manually corrected contours were not statistically significant. High dose differences could be observed when OAR contours were at short distances to the targets. However, this was not always interrelated.

CONCLUSION

DL methods generally showed higher delineation accuracy compared with ABAS methods for AS segmentation of HN OAR. Most ABAS contours had high conformity to the reference but were more time consuming than DL algorithms, especially when considering the computing time and the time spent on manual corrections.

3D Lightweight Network for Simultaneous Registration and Segmentation of Organs-at-Risk in CT Images of Head and Neck Cancer

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is the most effective treatment for head and neck cancer. The successful implementation of IGRT requires accurate delineation of organ-at-risk (OAR) in the computed tomography (CT) images. In routine clinical practice, OARs are manually segmented by oncologists, which is time-consuming, laborious, and subjective. To assist oncologists in OAR contouring, we proposed a three-dimensional (3D) lightweight framework for simultaneous OAR registration and segmentation. The registration network was designed to align a selected OAR template to a new image volume for OAR localization. A region of interest (ROI) selection layer then generated ROIs of OARs from the registration results, which were fed into a multiview segmentation network for accurate OAR segmentation. To improve the performance of registration and segmentation networks, a centre distance loss was designed for the registration network, an ROI classification branch was employed for the segmentation network, and further, context information was incorporated to iteratively promote both networks' performance. The segmentation results were further refined with shape information for final delineation. We evaluated registration and segmentation performances of the proposed framework using three datasets. On the internal dataset, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of registration and segmentation was 69.7% and 79.6%, respectively. In addition, our framework was evaluated on two external datasets and gained satisfactory performance. These results showed that the 3D lightweight framework achieved fast, accurate and robust registration and segmentation of OARs in head and neck cancer. The proposed framework has the potential of assisting oncologists in OAR delineation.

Prospectively-validated deep learning model for segmenting swallowing and chewing structures in CT

Objective.Delineating swallowing and chewing structures aids in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning to limit dysphagia, trismus, and speech dysfunction. We aim to develop an accurate and efficient method to automate this process.Approach.CT scans of 242 head and neck (H&N) cancer patients acquired from 2004 to 2009 at our institution were used to develop auto-segmentation models for the masseters, medial pterygoids, larynx, and pharyngeal constrictor muscle using DeepLabV3+. A cascaded framework was used, wherein models were trained sequentially to spatially constrain each structure group based on prior segmentations. Additionally, an ensemble of models, combining contextual information from axial, coronal, and sagittal views was used to improve segmentation accuracy. Prospective evaluation was conducted by measuring the amount of manual editing required in 91 H&N CT scans acquired February-May 2021.Main results. Medians and inter-quartile ranges of Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) computed on the retrospective testing set (N = 24) were 0.87 (0.85-0.89) for the masseters, 0.80 (0.79-0.81) for the medial pterygoids, 0.81 (0.79-0.84) for the larynx, and 0.69 (0.67-0.71) for the constrictor. Auto-segmentations, when compared to two sets of manual segmentations in 10 randomly selected scans, showed better agreement (DSC) with each observer than inter-observer DSC. Prospective analysis showed most manual modifications needed for clinical use were minor, suggesting auto-contouring could increase clinical efficiency. Trained segmentation models are available for research use upon request viahttps://github.com/cerr/CERR/wiki/Auto-Segmentation-models.Significance.We developed deep learning-based auto-segmentation models for swallowing and chewing structures in CT and demonstrated its potential for use in treatment planning to limit complications post-RT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only prospectively-validated deep learning-based model for segmenting chewing and swallowing structures in CT. Segmentation models have been made open-source to facilitate reproducibility and multi-institutional research.

Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients' care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making.

Automated delineation of head and neck organs at risk using synthetic MRI-aided mask scoring regional convolutional neural network

PURPOSE

Auto-segmentation algorithms offer a potential solution to eliminate the labor-intensive, time-consuming, and observer-dependent manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in radiotherapy treatment planning. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based automated OAR delineation method to tackle the current challenges remaining in achieving reliable expert performance with the state-of-the-art auto-delineation algorithms.

METHODS

The accuracy of OAR delineation is expected to be improved by utilizing the complementary contrasts provided by computed tomography (CT) (bony-structure contrast) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (soft-tissue contrast). Given CT images, synthetic MR images were firstly generated by a pre-trained cycle-consistent generative adversarial network. The features of CT and synthetic MRI were then extracted and combined for the final delineation of organs using mask scoring regional convolutional neural network. Both in-house and public datasets containing CT scans from head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients were adopted to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the proposed method against current state-of-the-art algorithms in metrics including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), mean surface distance (MSD), and residual mean square distance (RMS).

RESULTS

Across all of 18 OARs in our in-house dataset, the proposed method achieved an average DSC, HD95, MSD, and RMS of 0.77 (0.58-0.90), 2.90 mm (1.32-7.63 mm), 0.89 mm (0.42-1.85 mm), and 1.44 mm (0.71-3.15 mm), respectively, outperforming the current state-of-the-art algorithms by 6%, 16%, 25%, and 36%, respectively. On public datasets, for all nine OARs, an average DSC of 0.86 (0.73-0.97) were achieved, 6% better than the competing methods.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the feasibility of a synthetic MRI-aided deep learning framework for automated delineation of OARs in HN radiotherapy treatment planning. The proposed method could be adopted into routine HN cancer radiotherapy treatment planning to rapidly contour OARs with high accuracy.

Radiomics and Machine Learning for Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers

Introduction: An increasing number of parameters can be considered when making decisions in oncology. Tumor characteristics can also be extracted from imaging through the use of radiomics and add to this wealth of clinical data. Machine learning can encompass these parameters and thus enhance clinical decision as well as radiotherapy workflow. Methods: We performed a description of machine learning applications at each step of treatment by radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. We then performed a systematic review on radiomics and machine learning outcome prediction models in head and neck cancers. Results: Machine Learning has several promising applications in treatment planning with automatic organ at risk delineation improvements and adaptative radiotherapy workflow automation. It may also provide new approaches for Normal Tissue Complication Probability models. Radiomics may provide additional data on tumors for improved machine learning powered predictive models, not only on survival, but also on risk of distant metastasis, in field recurrence, HPV status and extra nodal spread. However, most studies provide preliminary data requiring further validation. Conclusion: Promising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care.

Hierarchical Vertex Regression-Based Segmentation of Head and Neck CT Images for Radiotherapy Planning

Segmenting organs at risk from head and neck CT images is a prerequisite for the treatment of head and neck cancer using intensity modulated radiotherapy. However, accurate and automatic segmentation of organs at risk is a challenging task due to the low contrast of soft tissue and image artifact in CT images. Shape priors have been proved effective in addressing this challenging task. However, conventional methods incorporating shape priors often suffer from sensitivity to shape initialization and also shape variations across individuals. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to incorporate shape priors into a hierarchical learning-based model. The contributions of our proposed approach are as follows: 1) a novel mechanism for critical vertices identification is proposed to identify vertices with distinctive appearances and strong consistency across different subjects; 2) a new strategy of hierarchical vertex regression is also used to gradually locate more vertices with the guidance of previously located vertices; and 3) an innovative framework of joint shape and appearance learning is further developed to capture salient shape and appearance features simultaneously. Using these innovative strategies, our proposed approach can essentially overcome drawbacks of the conventional shape-based segmentation methods. Experimental results show that our approach can achieve much better results than state-of-the-art methods.

Use of auto-segmentation in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in head and neck

BACKGROUND

Manual delineation of structures in head and neck cancers is an extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive procedure. With centers worldwide moving towards the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy, there is a need to explore and analyze auto-segmentation (AS) software, in the search for a faster yet accurate method of structure delineation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search for studies published after 2005 comparing AS and manual delineation in contouring organ at risks (OARs) and target volume for head and neck patients was conducted. The reviewed results were then categorized into arguments proposing and opposing the review title.

RESULTS

Ten studies were reviewed and derived results were assessed in terms of delineation time-saving ability and extent of delineation accuracy. The influence of other external factors (observer variability, AS strategies adopted and stage of disease) were also considered. Results were conflicting with some studies demonstrating great potential in replacing manual delineation whereas other studies illustrated otherwise. Six of 10 studies investigated time saving; the largest time saving reported being 59%. However, one study found that additional time of 15.7% was required for AS. Four studies reported AS contours to be between 'reasonably good' and 'better quality' than the clinically used contours. Remaining studies cited lack of contrast, AS strategy used and the need for physician intervention as limitations in the standardized use of AS.

DISCUSSION

The studies demonstrated significant potential of AS as a useful delineation tool in contouring target volumes and OARs in head and neck cancers. However, it is evident that AS cannot totally replace manual delineation in contouring some structures in the head and neck and cannot be used independently without human intervention. It is also emphasized that delineation studies should be conducted locally so as to evaluate the true value of AS in head and neck cancers in a specific center.