1
|
Li W, Song H, Li Z, Lin Y, Shi J, Yang J, Wu W. OrbitNet-A fully automated orbit multi-organ segmentation model based on transformer in CT images. Comput Biol Med 2023; 155:106628. [PMID: 36809695 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
The delineation of orbital organs is a vital step in orbital diseases diagnosis and preoperative planning. However, an accurate multi-organ segmentation is still a clinical problem which suffers from two limitations. First, the contrast of soft tissue is relatively low. It usually cannot clearly show the boundaries of organs. Second, the optic nerve and the rectus muscle are difficult to distinguish because they are spatially adjacent and have similar geometry. To address these challenges, we propose the OrbitNet model to automatically segment orbital organs in CT images. Specifically, we present a global feature extraction module based on the transformer architecture called FocusTrans encoder, which enhance the ability to extract boundary features. To make the network focus on the extraction of edge features in the optic nerve and rectus muscle, the SA block is used to replace the convolution block in the decoding stage. In addition, we use the structural similarity measure (SSIM) loss as a part of the hybrid loss function to learn the edge differences of the organs better. OrbitNet has been trained and tested on the CT dataset collected by the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The experimental results show that our proposed model achieved superior results. The average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) is 83.9%, the value of average 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) is 1.62 mm, and the value of average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) is 0.47 mm. Our model also has good performance on the MICCAI 2015 challenge dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Li
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Hong Song
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Zongyu Li
- School of Medical and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Yucong Lin
- School of Medical and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Jieliang Shi
- Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325072, China.
| | - Jian Yang
- School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Wencan Wu
- Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costea M, Zlate A, Durand M, Baudier T, Grégoire V, Sarrut D, Biston MC. Comparison of atlas-based and deep learning methods for organs at risk delineation on head-and-neck CT images using an automated treatment planning system. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:61-70. [PMID: 36328093 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate the performance of head-and-neck (HN) organs-at-risk (OAR) automatic segmentation (AS) using four atlas-based (ABAS) and two deep learning (DL) solutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients underwent iodine contrast-enhanced planning CT. Fourteen OAR were manually delineated. DL.1 and DL.2 solutions were trained with 63 mono-centric patients and > 1000 multi-centric patients, respectively. Ten and 15 patients with varied anatomies were selected for the atlas library and for testing, respectively. The evaluation was based on geometric indices (DICE coefficient and 95th percentile-Hausdorff Distance (HD95%)), time needed for manual corrections and clinical dosimetric endpoints obtained using automated treatment planning. RESULTS Both DICE and HD95% results indicated that DL algorithms generally performed better compared with ABAS algorithms for automatic segmentation of HN OAR. However, the hybrid-ABAS (ABAS.3) algorithm sometimes provided the highest agreement to the reference contours compared with the 2 DL. Compared with DL.2 and ABAS.3, DL.1 contours were the fastest to correct. For the 3 solutions, the differences in dose distributions obtained using AS contours and AS + manually corrected contours were not statistically significant. High dose differences could be observed when OAR contours were at short distances to the targets. However, this was not always interrelated. CONCLUSION DL methods generally showed higher delineation accuracy compared with ABAS methods for AS segmentation of HN OAR. Most ABAS contours had high conformity to the reference but were more time consuming than DL algorithms, especially when considering the computing time and the time spent on manual corrections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalina Costea
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373 LYON Cedex 08, France; CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - Morgane Durand
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373 LYON Cedex 08, France
| | - Thomas Baudier
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373 LYON Cedex 08, France; CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - David Sarrut
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373 LYON Cedex 08, France; CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Marie-Claude Biston
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69373 LYON Cedex 08, France; CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang B, Ye Y, Xu Z, Cai Z, He Y, Zhong Z, Liu L, Chen X, Chen H, Huang B. 3D Lightweight Network for Simultaneous Registration and Segmentation of Organs-at-Risk in CT Images of Head and Neck Cancer. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2022; 41:951-964. [PMID: 34784272 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3128408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is the most effective treatment for head and neck cancer. The successful implementation of IGRT requires accurate delineation of organ-at-risk (OAR) in the computed tomography (CT) images. In routine clinical practice, OARs are manually segmented by oncologists, which is time-consuming, laborious, and subjective. To assist oncologists in OAR contouring, we proposed a three-dimensional (3D) lightweight framework for simultaneous OAR registration and segmentation. The registration network was designed to align a selected OAR template to a new image volume for OAR localization. A region of interest (ROI) selection layer then generated ROIs of OARs from the registration results, which were fed into a multiview segmentation network for accurate OAR segmentation. To improve the performance of registration and segmentation networks, a centre distance loss was designed for the registration network, an ROI classification branch was employed for the segmentation network, and further, context information was incorporated to iteratively promote both networks' performance. The segmentation results were further refined with shape information for final delineation. We evaluated registration and segmentation performances of the proposed framework using three datasets. On the internal dataset, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of registration and segmentation was 69.7% and 79.6%, respectively. In addition, our framework was evaluated on two external datasets and gained satisfactory performance. These results showed that the 3D lightweight framework achieved fast, accurate and robust registration and segmentation of OARs in head and neck cancer. The proposed framework has the potential of assisting oncologists in OAR delineation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Iyer A, Thor M, Onochie I, Hesse J, Zakeri K, LoCastro E, Jiang J, Veeraraghavan H, Elguindi S, Lee NY, Deasy JO, Apte AP. Prospectively-validated deep learning model for segmenting swallowing and chewing structures in CT. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac4000. [PMID: 34874302 PMCID: PMC8911366 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Delineating swallowing and chewing structures aids in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning to limit dysphagia, trismus, and speech dysfunction. We aim to develop an accurate and efficient method to automate this process.Approach.CT scans of 242 head and neck (H&N) cancer patients acquired from 2004 to 2009 at our institution were used to develop auto-segmentation models for the masseters, medial pterygoids, larynx, and pharyngeal constrictor muscle using DeepLabV3+. A cascaded framework was used, wherein models were trained sequentially to spatially constrain each structure group based on prior segmentations. Additionally, an ensemble of models, combining contextual information from axial, coronal, and sagittal views was used to improve segmentation accuracy. Prospective evaluation was conducted by measuring the amount of manual editing required in 91 H&N CT scans acquired February-May 2021.Main results. Medians and inter-quartile ranges of Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) computed on the retrospective testing set (N = 24) were 0.87 (0.85-0.89) for the masseters, 0.80 (0.79-0.81) for the medial pterygoids, 0.81 (0.79-0.84) for the larynx, and 0.69 (0.67-0.71) for the constrictor. Auto-segmentations, when compared to two sets of manual segmentations in 10 randomly selected scans, showed better agreement (DSC) with each observer than inter-observer DSC. Prospective analysis showed most manual modifications needed for clinical use were minor, suggesting auto-contouring could increase clinical efficiency. Trained segmentation models are available for research use upon request viahttps://github.com/cerr/CERR/wiki/Auto-Segmentation-models.Significance.We developed deep learning-based auto-segmentation models for swallowing and chewing structures in CT and demonstrated its potential for use in treatment planning to limit complications post-RT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only prospectively-validated deep learning-based model for segmenting chewing and swallowing structures in CT. Segmentation models have been made open-source to facilitate reproducibility and multi-institutional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Iyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Maria Thor
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Jue Jiang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Harini Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sharif Elguindi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Joseph O. Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Aditya P. Apte
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Volpe S, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Bellerba F, Santamaria R, Marvaso G, Isaksson LJ, Gandini S, Starzyńska A, Leonardi MC, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772663. [PMID: 34869010 PMCID: PMC8637856 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a feasible approach to optimize patients' care path in Radiation Oncology. Applications include autosegmentation, treatment planning optimization, and prediction of oncological and toxicity outcomes. The purpose of this clinically oriented systematic review is to illustrate the potential and limitations of the most commonly used ML models in solving everyday clinical issues in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Electronic databases were screened up to May 2021. Studies dealing with ML and radiomics were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was rated by an adapted version of the qualitative checklist originally developed by Luo et al. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. RESULTS Forty-eight studies (21 on autosegmentation, four on treatment planning, 12 on oncological outcome prediction, 10 on toxicity prediction, and one on determinants of postoperative RT) were included in the analysis. The most common imaging modality was computed tomography (CT) (40%) followed by magnetic resonance (MR) (10%). Quantitative image features were considered in nine studies (19%). No significant differences were identified in global and methodological scores when works were stratified per their task (i.e., autosegmentation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The range of possible applications of ML in the field of HN Radiation Oncology is wide, albeit this area of research is relatively young. Overall, if not safe yet, ML is most probably a bet worth making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Bellerba
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Santamaria
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Starzyńska
- Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dai X, Lei Y, Wang T, Zhou J, Roper J, McDonald M, Beitler JJ, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Automated delineation of head and neck organs at risk using synthetic MRI-aided mask scoring regional convolutional neural network. Med Phys 2021; 48:5862-5873. [PMID: 34342878 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Auto-segmentation algorithms offer a potential solution to eliminate the labor-intensive, time-consuming, and observer-dependent manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in radiotherapy treatment planning. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based automated OAR delineation method to tackle the current challenges remaining in achieving reliable expert performance with the state-of-the-art auto-delineation algorithms. METHODS The accuracy of OAR delineation is expected to be improved by utilizing the complementary contrasts provided by computed tomography (CT) (bony-structure contrast) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (soft-tissue contrast). Given CT images, synthetic MR images were firstly generated by a pre-trained cycle-consistent generative adversarial network. The features of CT and synthetic MRI were then extracted and combined for the final delineation of organs using mask scoring regional convolutional neural network. Both in-house and public datasets containing CT scans from head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients were adopted to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the proposed method against current state-of-the-art algorithms in metrics including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), mean surface distance (MSD), and residual mean square distance (RMS). RESULTS Across all of 18 OARs in our in-house dataset, the proposed method achieved an average DSC, HD95, MSD, and RMS of 0.77 (0.58-0.90), 2.90 mm (1.32-7.63 mm), 0.89 mm (0.42-1.85 mm), and 1.44 mm (0.71-3.15 mm), respectively, outperforming the current state-of-the-art algorithms by 6%, 16%, 25%, and 36%, respectively. On public datasets, for all nine OARs, an average DSC of 0.86 (0.73-0.97) were achieved, 6% better than the competing methods. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the feasibility of a synthetic MRI-aided deep learning framework for automated delineation of OARs in HN radiotherapy treatment planning. The proposed method could be adopted into routine HN cancer radiotherapy treatment planning to rapidly contour OARs with high accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianjin Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tang H, Chen X, Liu Y, Lu Z, You J, Yang M, Yao S, Zhao G, Xu Y, Chen T, Liu Y, Xie X. Clinically applicable deep learning framework for organs at risk delineation in CT images. NAT MACH INTELL 2019. [DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0099-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
8
|
Giraud P, Giraud P, Gasnier A, El Ayachy R, Kreps S, Foy JP, Durdux C, Huguet F, Burgun A, Bibault JE. Radiomics and Machine Learning for Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers. Front Oncol 2019; 9:174. [PMID: 30972291 PMCID: PMC6445892 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: An increasing number of parameters can be considered when making decisions in oncology. Tumor characteristics can also be extracted from imaging through the use of radiomics and add to this wealth of clinical data. Machine learning can encompass these parameters and thus enhance clinical decision as well as radiotherapy workflow. Methods: We performed a description of machine learning applications at each step of treatment by radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. We then performed a systematic review on radiomics and machine learning outcome prediction models in head and neck cancers. Results: Machine Learning has several promising applications in treatment planning with automatic organ at risk delineation improvements and adaptative radiotherapy workflow automation. It may also provide new approaches for Normal Tissue Complication Probability models. Radiomics may provide additional data on tumors for improved machine learning powered predictive models, not only on survival, but also on risk of distant metastasis, in field recurrence, HPV status and extra nodal spread. However, most studies provide preliminary data requiring further validation. Conclusion: Promising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Anne Gasnier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Radouane El Ayachy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Kreps
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Foy
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Sorbonne University, Pitié-Salpêtriére Hospital, Paris, France.,Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Catherine Durdux
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon University Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne University Medical Faculty, Paris, France
| | - Anita Burgun
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Bibault
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.,INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhensong Wang, Lifang Wei, Li Wang, Yaozong Gao, Wufan Chen, Dinggang Shen. Hierarchical Vertex Regression-Based Segmentation of Head and Neck CT Images for Radiotherapy Planning. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING : A PUBLICATION OF THE IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING SOCIETY 2018; 27:923-937. [PMID: 29757737 PMCID: PMC5954838 DOI: 10.1109/tip.2017.2768621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Segmenting organs at risk from head and neck CT images is a prerequisite for the treatment of head and neck cancer using intensity modulated radiotherapy. However, accurate and automatic segmentation of organs at risk is a challenging task due to the low contrast of soft tissue and image artifact in CT images. Shape priors have been proved effective in addressing this challenging task. However, conventional methods incorporating shape priors often suffer from sensitivity to shape initialization and also shape variations across individuals. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to incorporate shape priors into a hierarchical learning-based model. The contributions of our proposed approach are as follows: 1) a novel mechanism for critical vertices identification is proposed to identify vertices with distinctive appearances and strong consistency across different subjects; 2) a new strategy of hierarchical vertex regression is also used to gradually locate more vertices with the guidance of previously located vertices; and 3) an innovative framework of joint shape and appearance learning is further developed to capture salient shape and appearance features simultaneously. Using these innovative strategies, our proposed approach can essentially overcome drawbacks of the conventional shape-based segmentation methods. Experimental results show that our approach can achieve much better results than state-of-the-art methods.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lim JY, Leech M. Use of auto-segmentation in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in head and neck. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:799-806. [PMID: 27248772 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2016.1173723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Manual delineation of structures in head and neck cancers is an extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive procedure. With centers worldwide moving towards the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy, there is a need to explore and analyze auto-segmentation (AS) software, in the search for a faster yet accurate method of structure delineation. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search for studies published after 2005 comparing AS and manual delineation in contouring organ at risks (OARs) and target volume for head and neck patients was conducted. The reviewed results were then categorized into arguments proposing and opposing the review title. RESULTS Ten studies were reviewed and derived results were assessed in terms of delineation time-saving ability and extent of delineation accuracy. The influence of other external factors (observer variability, AS strategies adopted and stage of disease) were also considered. Results were conflicting with some studies demonstrating great potential in replacing manual delineation whereas other studies illustrated otherwise. Six of 10 studies investigated time saving; the largest time saving reported being 59%. However, one study found that additional time of 15.7% was required for AS. Four studies reported AS contours to be between 'reasonably good' and 'better quality' than the clinically used contours. Remaining studies cited lack of contrast, AS strategy used and the need for physician intervention as limitations in the standardized use of AS. DISCUSSION The studies demonstrated significant potential of AS as a useful delineation tool in contouring target volumes and OARs in head and neck cancers. However, it is evident that AS cannot totally replace manual delineation in contouring some structures in the head and neck and cannot be used independently without human intervention. It is also emphasized that delineation studies should be conducted locally so as to evaluate the true value of AS in head and neck cancers in a specific center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Yi Lim
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| | - Michelle Leech
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Anders LC, Stieler F, Siebenlist K, Schäfer J, Lohr F, Wenz F. Performance of an atlas-based autosegmentation software for delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy of breast and anorectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102:68-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2011] [Revised: 08/26/2011] [Accepted: 08/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Teguh DN, Levendag PC, Voet PW, Al-Mamgani A, Han X, Wolf TK, Hibbard LS, Nowak P, Akhiat H, Dirkx ML, Heijmen BJ, Hoogeman MS. Clinical Validation of Atlas-Based Auto-Segmentation of Multiple Target Volumes and Normal Tissue (Swallowing/Mastication) Structures in the Head and Neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:950-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2010] [Revised: 06/18/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|