1
|
Chen W, Chen WM, Chen SX, Jiang L, Shu GG, Yin YX, Quan ZP, Zhou ZY, Shen MJ, Qin YT, Yang CL, Su XJ, Kang M. Establishment of a visualized mouse orthotopic xenograft model of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 2024; 25:2382531. [PMID: 39206791 PMCID: PMC11364074 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2382531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Mouse orthotopic xenograft tumor models are commonly employed in studies investigating the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of tumors and their preclinical treatment. However, the unavailability of mature and visualized orthotopic xenograft models of nasopharyngeal carcinoma limits the development of treatment strategies for this cancer. The aim of this study was to provide a simple and reliable method for building an orthotopic xenograft model of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (C666-1-luc) cells, stably expressing the firefly luciferase gene, were injected subcutaneously into the right axilla of BALB/C nude mice. Four weeks later, the resulting subcutaneous tumors were cut into small blocks and grafted into the nasopharynx of immunodeficient BALB/C nude mice to induce tumor formation. Tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The expression of histological and immunological antigens associated with orthotopic xenograft nasopharyngeal carcinoma was analyzed by tissue section analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC). A visualized orthotopic xenograft nasopharyngeal carcinoma model was successfully developed in this study. Luminescence signal detection, micro-MRI, and hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed the successful growth of tumors in the nasopharynx of the nude mice. Moreover, IHC analysis detected cytokeratin (CK), CK5/6, P40, and P63 expression in the orthotopic tumors, consistent with the reported expression of these antigens in human nasopharyngeal tumors. This study established a reproducible, visual, and less lethal orthotopic xenograft model of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, providing a platform for preclinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Wei-Min Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Si-Xia Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Li Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Ge-Ge Shu
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yuan-Xiu Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Zhi-Peng Quan
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Zi-Yan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Ming-Jun Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Ya-Ting Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Chao-Lin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xue-Jin Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Min Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhattacharyya M, Medhi PP, Sharma P, Nath J, Kalita AK, Roy PS, Rahman T, Yanthan Y. Patterns of failure in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer of Northeastern region of India: a retrospective observational study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:3743-3753. [PMID: 38578506 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to analyze patterns of failure and disease volume-treatment outcomes in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with definitive radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre in northeast India. METHODS From February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proved non-metastatic NPC patients treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves compared outcome variables based on ROC analysis-classified tumor volume. RESULTS During a median follow up of 25.4 months (17.3-39.2), 35(35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-three patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10% and 74.10% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in LRFS according to T staging (p < 0.0001). Gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross nodal volume (GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7 mL and 3.7 and 39.2 mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p = 0.03) and GTVn (p = 0.00024). CONCLUSIONS For NPC patients who undergo curative IMRT, primary tumour and nodal volumes are independent prognostic indicators. GTVp and GTVn are highly predictive of local control, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Partha Pratim Medhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Prashasti Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
| | - Jyotiman Nath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Apurba Kumar Kalita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Partha Sarathi Roy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Tashnin Rahman
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Yanpothung Yanthan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Huang N, Yip PL, Wang J, Huang R, Sun Z, Kang D, He Q, Deng X, Zhao C, Chua MLK, Han F. The individualized delineation of clinical target volume for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on invasion risk of substructures: A prospective, real-world study with a large population. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110154. [PMID: 38367938 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is currently controversial and the international guideline still recommend a uniform border for CTV regardless of the tumor extent. We conducted this prospective, real-world study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of our individualized CTV delineation method based on distance plus substructures. MATERIALS AND METHODS We preliminarily investigated the local extension patterns of NPC on 354 newly diagnosed patients and defined the structures surrounding the nasopharynx as Level-1 to Level-4 substructures stratified by the risk of invasion. We then enrolled patients with newly diagnosed NPC without distant metastasis to investigate our individualized CTV delineation protocol. All patients received intensity modulated radiotherapy. CTV1 and CTV2 were prescribed doses of 60 Gy and 54 Gy in 30 ∼ 33 fractions. The primary endpoint was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS); secondary endpoints included regional control and survival, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The local failure patterns were also analyzed. RESULTS From January 2008 to December 2012 and from January 2013 to September 2019, 356 and 648 patients were enrolled, named as training set and validation set, respectively. With a median follow-up of 104.6 (interquartile, 73.1-126.9) and 51.4 (39.5-78.5) months, 31 (8.7 %) and 38 (5.9 %) patients in training and validation sets experienced local recurrence, and the 5-year LRFS was 93.0 % and 93.2 %, respectively; 63 (17.7 %) and 39 (6 %) patients died in training and validation sets, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 88.5 % and 93.4 %, respectively. For the whole study cohort (N = 1004) with a median follow-up of 66.6 (41.5-98.0) months, the 5-year LRFS and OS was 93.2 % and 91.5 %. The grade 3 late toxicities included xerostomia, subcutaneous fibrosis, hearing impairment, trismus, visuality impairment and skin atrophy, with a total incidence of 1.5 %. Sixty-seven of 69 (97.1 %) local recurrence was in high-dose area. CONCLUSION Our individualized CTV delineation method can achieve favorable local tumor control and long-term survival outcomes with acceptable late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pui Lam Yip
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Runda Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dehua Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowu Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | - Fei Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen Y, Zhang Q, Lu T, Hu C, Zong J, Xu Y, Zheng W, Chen L, Lin S, Qiu S, Xu L, Pan J, Guo Q, Lin S. Prioritizing sufficient dose to gross tumor volume over normal tissue sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment of T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2023; 45:1130-1140. [PMID: 36856128 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), priority is often given minimize dose to the critical organs at risk (OARs) to avoid potential morbid sequelae. However, in T4 NPC, dosimetric inadequacy enforced by dose constraints on OARs may significantly impact tumor control. METHODS This was a single-institute cohort that patients diagnosed between July 2005 and December 2010 with T4 NPC treated with IMRT. All patients were re-classification according to the 7th-AJCC stage. RESULTS Overall, the average doses such as Dmax , D1% , D2% and D1cc for various Central nervous system (CNS) OARs including brainstem, optic nerve, chiasm, temporal lobes and spinal cord were found to exceed published guidelines as RTOG0225. However, no clinical toxicities were seen during the follow-up period except for 13% patients with temporal lobe necrosis. CONCLUSION Our retrospective review showed that its feasible to maximize gross tumor volume dose coverage while exceeding most CNS OAR constraint standards, with ideal local control and no obvious increase of craniocerebral toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Fuzhou, China
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Quxia Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Cairong Hu
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Lisha Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Senan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Sufang Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Luying Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim D, Keam B, Ahn SH, Choi CH, Wu HG. Feasibility and safety of neck level IB-sparing radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer: a long-term single institution analysis. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 40:260-269. [PMID: 36606303 PMCID: PMC9830035 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2022.00346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has a higher prevalence of regional nodal metastasis than other head and neck cancers; however, level IB lymph node involvement is rare. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of level IB-sparing radiotherapy (RT) for NPC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 236 patients with NPC who underwent definitive intensity-modulated RT with or without chemotherapy between 2004 and 2018. Of them, 212 received IB-sparing RT, and 24 received non-IB-sparing RT. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to compare treatment outcomes according to IB-sparing status. In addition, dosimetric analysis of the salivary glands was performed to identify the relationship between xerostomia and the IB-sparing RT. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 78 months (range, 7 to 194 months). Local, regional, and distant recurrences were observed in 11.9%, 6.8%, and 16.1% of patients, respectively. Of the 16 patients with regional recurrence, 14 underwent IB-sparing RT. The most common site categorization of regional recurrence was level II (75%), followed by retropharyngeal lymph nodes (43.8%); however, there was no recurrence at level IB. In the matched cohorts, IB-sparing RT was not significantly related to treatment outcomes. However, IB-sparing RT patients received a significantly lower mean ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular glands doses (all, p < 0.001) and had a lower incidence of chronic xerostomia compared with non-IB-sparing RT patients (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that IB-sparing RT is sufficiently safe and feasible for treating NPC. To reduce the occurrence of xerostomia, IB-sparing RT should be considered without compromising target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dowook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bhumsuk Keam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Cancer Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Correspondence: Hong-Gyun Wu Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2072-3177 Fax: +82-2-765-3317 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiromaru R, Nakagawa T, Yasumatsu R. Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Current and Emerging Treatment Options. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:2681-2689. [PMID: 36117730 PMCID: PMC9480178 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s341472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has seen improved treatment outcomes and a decrease in incidence worldwide in recent years due to developments in medicine and improved public health. However, 70% of cases are still diagnosed at advanced stages and these advanced NPC cases show a poor prognosis. Reports on current and future treatment in advanced NPC are summarized. Chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced NPC. The administration of platinum agents as a concurrent drug and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most appropriate irradiation method, and is associated with high local control rates. For induction and adjuvant chemotherapy, platinum-based two- or three-drug combination chemotherapy is recommended. The tumour volume, plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA levels, and the tumour site are used to determine the indication for adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The tolerability of induction chemotherapy is controversial, and the indications and timing should be carefully considered in each case. Chemotherapy is used for patients with distant metastasis. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is the first-line regimen. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has recently been reported for NPC and, as in other areas of the head and neck, it is expected to be effective for patients with recurrent/distant metastasis. Trials are underway for various uses of ICIs, including induction chemotherapy, postoperative treatment, and use in combination with chemoradiotherapy. Immunotherapy for NPC, an EBV-associated cancer, has been reported to have some efficacy with immunotherapy used in other EBV-associated cancers. Immunotherapy may be introduced for NPC in the future, depending on the results of clinical trials. Future changes in the treatment of NPC are expected to include risk classification based on plasma EBV-DNA levels and the development of personalized treatment with individual selection of timing and type of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina Jiromaru
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Nakagawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ryuji Yasumatsu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu M, Jin J, Li Z, Kong F, He Y, Liu L, Yang W, Xu X. Influence of beamlet width on dynamic IMRT plan quality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PeerJ 2022; 10:e13748. [PMID: 35959479 PMCID: PMC9359131 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to identify the effects of beamlet width on dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and determine the optimal parameters for the most effective radiotherapy plan. Methods This study evaluated 20 patients with NPC were selected for dynamic IMRT. Only the beamlet width in the optimization parameters was changed (set to 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm that were named BL02, BL04, BL06, BL08, and BL10, respectively) to optimize the results of the five groups of plans. Using the plan quality scoring system, the dose results of the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risks (OARs) were analyzed objectively and comprehensively. The lower the quality score, the better the quality of the plan. The efficiency and accuracy of plan execution were evaluated using monitor units (MUs) and plan delivery time (PDT). Results The BL04 mm group had the lowest quality score for the targets and OARs (0.087), while the BL10 mm group had the highest total score (1.249). The BL04 mm group had the highest MUs (837 MUs) and longest PDT (358 s). However, the MUs range of each group plan was below 100 MUs, and the PDT range was within 30 s. In the BL02, BL04, BL06, BL08, and BL10 plans, <5 MUs segments accounted for 33%, 16%, 24%, 33%, and 40% of total segments, respectively, with which the lowest was in the BL04 mm group. Conclusion Smaller beamlet widths have not only reduced OARs dose while maintaining high dose coverage to the PTVs, but also lead to more MUs that would produce greater PDT. Considering the quality and efficiency of dynamic IMRT, the beamlet width value of the Monaco treatment planning system set to 4 mm would be optimal for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manya Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinhui Jin
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Fantu Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yadi He
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lijiang Liu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Yang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiangying Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo Q, Xiao N, Xu H, Zong J, Xiao Y, Lu T, Xu Y, Wang B, Chen B, Pan J, Lin S. Level Ib sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy in selected nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on the International Guideline. Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:239-243. [PMID: 34973279 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of level Ib sparing in selected nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on the International Guideline. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS Patients with histologically-proven NPC who received definitive IMRT at our group were candidates for this analysis. Other eligibility criteria for analysis were designed according to the recommendation of International Guideline for selective coverage of level Ib. Survival outcomes focused on regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) and level Ib recurrence rate were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 450 patients were included, 60 of them received level Ib-covering IMRT due to the first three principles of the International Guideline according to our protocol. Of note, patients with level Ib involvement would receive ultrasound guided puncture, only those with positive pathological results would undergo level Ib-covering IMRT. For the remaining 390 patients who only fulfilled the last two criteria and/or level Ib involvement with negative pathological results, level Ib-sparing IMRT was delivered, with a median follow-up time of 112 months (range 6 to 194 months), reported 5- and 10-year RRFS were 95.4% and 92.9%, respectively. Twenty-two patients occurred regional recurrence at censorship (median 44.5 months), only 4(4/390, 1.03%) were recorded as level Ib recurrence. CONCLUSION Level Ib-sparing IMRT should be safe and feasible for patients who only had level II involvement with ECE, and/or had a MAD of greater than 2 cm in level II, and/or level Ib involvement with negative pathological results. Further well-designed multi-center prospective trials should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hanchuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Youping Xiao
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Tianzhu Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bingyi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bijuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xia WX, Lv X, Liang H, Liu GY, Sun R, Zeng Q, Li SW, Mo HY, Han F, Luo DH, Liu Q, Shi MY, Ye YF, Yang J, Ke LR, Qiang MY, Qiu WZ, Yu YH, Liu KY, Huang XJ, Li WZ, Lv SH, Cai ZC, Miao JJ, Guo L, Chen MY, Cao KJ, Wang L, Zhao C, Huang PY, Chen QY, Hua YJ, Tang LQ, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Guo X, Xiang YQ. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Schedules for Cisplatin Treatment in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4186-4194. [PMID: 34083231 PMCID: PMC8974421 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies suggest that a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 might be adequate in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). However, two cycles of once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 has never been prospectively compared with standard once-a-week cisplatin regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS This trial was conducted at three hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited (ChiCTR-TRC-12001979) and randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequence to receive once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 for two cycles or once-a-week cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 for six cycles concurrently with IMRT. Primary endpoint was failure-free survival and between-group absolute difference of 10% as the noninferiority margin. RESULTS A total of 510 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 58.3 months with 85.4% of 3-year failure-free survival in the once-every-3-weeks group and 85.6% in the once-a-week group. An absolute difference of -0.2% (95% confidence interval, -6.3 to 5.9; P noninferiority = 0.0016). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.8% in the once-every-3-weeks group and 66.3% in the once-a-week group (P = 0.015). The most common acute toxicities were hematologic abnormalities, including leukopenia (16% vs. 27%; P = 0.0022) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 5%; P = 0.015). The late grade 3-4 auditory loss rate was significantly lower in the once-every-3-weeks group than the once-a-week group (6% vs. 13%; P = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy is noninferior to once-a-week cisplatin in the treatment efficacy in the LANPC. Although both regimens are well tolerated, severe acute toxicities and late-onset auditory loss are higher in the once-a-week group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Xiong Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xing Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hu Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Guo-Ying Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Rui Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qi Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, P.R. China
| | - Si-Wei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Fei Han
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Dong-Hua Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Meng-Yun Shi
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yan-Fang Ye
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Liang-Ru Ke
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Meng-Yun Qiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wen-Ze Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ya-Hui Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Kui-Yuan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Jun Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wang-Zhong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Hui Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhuo-Chen Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Jing-Jing Miao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ling Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Ka-Jia Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Pei-Yu Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Jun Hua
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| | - Xiang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Corresponding Authors: Yan-Qun Xiang, Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, P.R. China. Phone: 86208734-3392; Fax: 8620-87343359; E-mail: ; Xiang Guo, ; and Hai-Qiang Mai,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ni M, Geng L, Kong F, Du C, Zhai R, Lyu Y, Hu C, Ying H. Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for 129 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients With Synchronous Metastases: A Retrospective Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:654871. [PMID: 34094946 PMCID: PMC8175973 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect and prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with distant metastases at initial diagnosis receiving induction chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods A total of 129 patients who underwent platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by definitive IMRT with or without concurrent or adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed distant metastatic NPC in our center between March 2008 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. 41 patients underwent local therapy for metastatic sites. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to figure out independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). Results A total of 66 patients had been dead (median follow-up time, 51.5 months). The median overall survival (OS) time was 54.2 months (range, 7-136 months), and the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year overall survival rates were 88.0%,71.0%,58.0%, and 47.0%. Multivariate analysis found that the factors correlated with poor overall survival were pre-treatment serum lactate dehydrogenase (SLDH) >180U/L, chemotherapy cycles<4, and M1 stage subdivision (M1b, single hepatic metastasis and/or multiple metastases excluding the liver; and M1c, multiple hepatic metastases). The 5-year OS rates for M1a, M1b and M1c were 62.6%,40.4% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion Platinum-containing induction chemotherapy combined with IMRT seemed to be advantageous to prolong survival for some NPC patients with synchronous metastases at initial diagnosis. The independent factors to prognosticate OS were pre-treatment SLDH, number of chemotherapy cycles, and M1 subcategories. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengshan Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijun Geng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangfang Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengrun Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiping Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingchen Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongmei Ying
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 133:2044-2053. [PMID: 32810045 PMCID: PMC7478675 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000000978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system. RESULTS In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system. CONCLUSIONS Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Yeh SA, Hwang TZ, Wang CC, Yang CC, Lien CF, Wang CC, Hsu TY, Hsu RF, Shih YC, Huang YC, Hsieh MC, Gau JS, Chang L, Lee TF. Outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:438-447. [PMID: 33783535 PMCID: PMC8127674 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal cancer shows a good response to intensity-modulated radiotherapy. However, there is no clear evidence for the benefits of routine use of image-guided radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective investigation of the treatment outcomes, treatment-related complications and prognostic factors for nasopharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy techniques. Retrospective analysis was performed on 326 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated between 2004 and 2015. Potentially significant patient-related and treatment-related variables were analyzed. Radiation-related complications were recorded. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of these patients were 77.9% and 70.5%, respectively. Age, AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, treatment interruption and body mass index were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Age, AJCC stage, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, image-guided radiotherapy and body mass index were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. In conclusion, intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly improves the treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal cancer. With the aid of image-guided radiotherapy, the advantage of intensity-modulated radiotherapy might be further amplified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tzer-Zen Hwang
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chun Wang
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chuen-Chien Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Feng Lien
- School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chung Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Tun-Yen Hsu
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Ruey-Feng Hsu
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chen Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Yaw-Chang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Che Hsieh
- Department of Medical Oncology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Jhy-Shyan Gau
- Department of Radiology, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Liyun Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Tsair-Fwu Lee
- Department of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Split-field versus extended-field step-and-shoot IMRT techniques in nasopharyngeal cancer: a report of acute and late toxicities. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:This study aimed to evaluate acute and late toxicities in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients who were treated between split-field (SF) and extended-field (EF) step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques.Materials and methods:Between January 2011 and October 2011, 21 NPC patients with stage I-IVB (7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging) were randomly assigned to undergo radiotherapy with SF or EF step-and-shoot IMRT technique.Results:At a median follow-up time of 60 months (range 3–77), we reported the comparable acute and late toxicities between the two techniques. One patient (9%) in SF-IMRT arm developed grade 3 acute skin toxicity.Findings:Both SF and EF step-and-shoot IMRT techniques for NPC patients did not produce any statistically significant differences in both acute and late toxicities. Although no difference in toxicity was observed, technical problems due to field matching management were the obstacles in utilisation of SF-IMRT in our routine practice.
Collapse
|
14
|
DVH Prediction for VMAT in NPC with GRU-RNN: An Improved Method by Considering Biological Effects. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:2043830. [PMID: 33532489 PMCID: PMC7837766 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2043830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose A recurrent neural network (RNN) and its variants such as gated recurrent unit-based RNN (GRU-RNN) were found to be very suitable for dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction in our previously published work. Using the dosimetric information generated by nonmodulated beams of different orientations, the GRU-RNN model was capable of accurate DVH prediction for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment planning. On the basis of our previous work, we proposed an improved approach and aimed to further improve the DVH prediction accuracy as well as study the feasibility of applying the proposed method to relatively small-size patient data. Methods Eighty NPC volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with local IRB's approval in recent two years were retrospectively and randomly selected in this study. All these original plans were created using the Eclipse treatment planning system (V13.5, Varian Medical Systems, USA) with ≥95% of PGTVnx receiving the prescribed doses of 70 Gy, ≥95% of PGTVnd receiving 66 Gy, and ≥95% of PTV receiving 60 Gy. Among them, fifty plans were used to train the DVH prediction model, and the remaining were used for testing. On the basis of our previously published work, we simplified the 3-layer GRU-RNN model to a single-layer model and further trained every organ at risk (OAR) separately with an OAR-specific equivalent uniform dose- (EUD-) based loss function. Results The results of linear least squares regression obtained by the new proposed method showed the excellent agreements between the predictions and the original plans with the correlation coefficient r = 0.976 and 0.968 for EUD results and maximum dose results, respectively, and the coefficient r of our previously published method was 0.957 and 0.946, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test results between the proposed and the previous work showed that the proposed method could significantly improve the EUD prediction accuracy for the brainstem, spinal cord, and temporal lobes with a p value < 0.01. Conclusions The accuracy of DVH prediction achieved in different OARs showed the great improvements compared to the previous works, and more importantly, the effectiveness and robustness showed by the simplified GRU-RNN trained from relatively small-size DVH samples, fully demonstrated the feasibility of applying the proposed method to small-size patient data. Excellent agreements in both EUD results and maximum dose results between the predictions and original plans indicated the application prospect in a physically and biologically related (or a mixture of both) model for treatment planning.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang S, Yang S, Xu P, Xu Y, Zhou G, Ou X, Wu R, Lan M, Fontanarosa D, Dowling J, Wang X, Lin S, Yi JL, Sun Y, Hu C, Lang J. Variations of Clinical Target Volume Delineation for Primary Site of Nasopharyngeal Cancer Among Five Centers in China. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1572. [PMID: 32974193 PMCID: PMC7468394 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation for primary site of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) among five large tertiary cancer centers in China. Materials and Methods The simulation CT and MR images of a patient with T3N2M0 NPC were sent to the centers participating. Fourteen experienced physicians contoured the targets independently, and the outlined structures were compared. The consistency and differences among these 14 CTVs are discussed. Results Two different CTV designs were used in the centers. "One-CTV" design defines one CTV with a dose of 60 Gy, whereas "two-CTV" design has a high-risk CTV with dose of 60 Gy and a medium risk CTV with dose of 54 Gy. We found that the coverage of prophylactic area is very consistent between these two designs. The variances on the coverage of some sites were also significant among physicians, including covering cavernous sinus at un-involved side, posterior space of styloid process, and caudal border on posterior pharyngeal wall. Conclusions Standardization is the main requirement for personalization of care; our study shows that among the 14 physicians in the five centers the coverage of prophylactic areas is in excellent agreement. Two distinct strategies on CTV design are currently being used, and multiple controversies were found, suggesting further optimization of CTV for primary site of NPC is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shichuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Shuang Yang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.,Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Cangxi County, Guangyuan, China
| | - Peng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Center, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guanqun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaomin Ou
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union University, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Lan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Davide Fontanarosa
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jason Dowling
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Xiaoshen Wang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Center, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun-Lin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iacovelli NA, Cicchetti A, Cavallo A, Alfieri S, Locati L, Ivaldi E, Ingargiola R, Romanello DA, Bossi P, Cavalieri S, Tenconi C, Meroni S, Calareso G, Guzzo M, Piazza C, Licitra L, Pignoli E, Carlo F, Orlandi E. Role of IMRT/VMAT-Based Dose and Volume Parameters in Predicting 5-Year Local Control and Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:518110. [PMID: 33072562 PMCID: PMC7541899 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.518110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to look into the relationship between intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT)- or volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy (VMAT)-based dose–volume parameters and 5-year outcome for a consecutive series of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients (pts) treated in a single institution in a non-endemic area in order to identify potential prognostic factors. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive non-metastatic NPC pts treated curatively with IMRT or VMAT and chemotherapy (CHT) between 2004 and 2014 was conducted. One patient was in stage I (0.7%), and 24 pts (17.5%) were in stage II, 38 pts (27.7%) in stage III, 29 pts (21.2%) in stage IVA, and 45 pts (32.8%) in stage IVB. Five pts (3.6%) received radiotherapy (RT) alone. Of the remaining 132 pts (96.4%), 30 pts (21.9%) received CHT concomitant to RT, and 102 pts (74.4%) were treated with induction CHT followed by RT-CHT. IMRT was given with standard fractionation at a total dose of 70 Gy. Clinical outcomes investigated in the study were local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was performed for the outcomes considering dose and coverage parameters, staging, and RT technique. Results: Overall, 137 pts were eligible for this retrospective analysis. With a median follow-up of 70 months (range 12–143), actuarial rates at 5 years were LC 90.4, DFS 77.2, and OS 82.8%. For this preliminary study, T stage was dichotomized as T1, T2, T3 vs. T4. At 5 years, the group T1–T2–T3 reported an LC of 93%, a DFS of 79%, and an OS of 88%, whereas T4 pts reported LC, DFS, and OS, respectively, of 56, 50, and 78%. Pts with V95% > 95.5% had better LC (p = 0.006). Pts with D99% > 63.8 Gy had better LC (p = 0.034) and OS (p = 0.005). The threshold value of 43.2 cm3 of GTVT was prognostic for LC (p = 0.016). To predict the risk of local recurrence at 5 years, we constructed a nomogram which combined GTVT with D99% relative to HRPTV. Conclusions: We demonstrated the prognostic value of some dose–volume parameters, although in a retrospective series, this is potentially useful to improve planning procedure. In addition, for the first time in a non-endemic area, a threshold value of GTVT, prognostic for LC, has been confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Cicchetti
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallo
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Alfieri
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Eliana Ivaldi
- Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico A Romanello
- Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Meroni
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Guzzo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fallai Carlo
- Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Radiotherapy Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cao W, Zhuang Y, Chen L, Liu X. Application of dose-volume histogram prediction in biologically related models for nasopharyngeal carcinomas treatment planning. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:216. [PMID: 32933543 PMCID: PMC7653901 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01623-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we employed a gated recurrent unit (GRU)-based recurrent neural network (RNN) using dosimetric information induced by individual beam to predict the dose-volume histogram (DVH) and investigated the feasibility and usefulness of this method in biologically related models for nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred patients with NPC undergoing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) between 2018 and 2019 were randomly selected for this study. All the VMAT plans were created using the Monaco treatment planning system (Elekta, Sweden) and clinically approved: > 98% of PGTVnx received the prescribed doses of 70 Gy, > 98% of PGTVnd received the prescribed doses of 66 Gy and > 98% of PCTV received 60 Gy. Of these, the data from 80 patients were used to train the GRU-RNN, and the data from the other 20 patients were used for testing. For each NPC patient, the DVHs of different organs at risk were predicted by a trained GRU-based RNN using the information given by individual conformal beams. Based on the predicted DVHs, the equivalent uniform doses (EUD) were calculated and applied as dose constraints during treatment planning optimization. The regenerated VMAT experimental plans (EPs) were evaluated by comparing them with the clinical plans (CPs). RESULTS For the 20 test patients, the regenerated EPs guided by the GRU-RNN predictive model achieved good consistency relative to the CPs. The EPs showed better consistency in PTV dose distribution and better dose sparing for many organs at risk, and significant differences were found in the maximum/mean doses to the brainstem, brainstem PRV, spinal cord, lenses, temporal lobes, parotid glands and larynx with P-values < 0.05. On average, compared with the CPs, the maximum/mean doses to these OARs were altered by - 3.44 Gy, - 1.94 Gy, - 1.88 Gy, 0.44 Gy, 1.98 Gy, - 1.82 Gy and 2.27 Gy, respectively. In addition, significant differences were also found in brainstem and spinal cord for the dose received by 1 cc volume with 4.11 and 1.67 Gy dose reduction in EPs on average. CONCLUSION The GRU-RNN-based DVH prediction method was capable of accurate DVH prediction. The regenerated plans guided by the predicted EUDs were not inferior to the manual plans, had better consistency in PTVs and better dose sparing in critical OARs, indicating the usefulness and effectiveness of biologically related model in knowledge-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wufei Cao
- School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275 China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Yongdong Zhuang
- National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116 China
| | - Lixin Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060 China
| | - Xiaowei Liu
- School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275 China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tseng M, Ho F, Leong YH, Wong LC, Tham IW, Cheo T, Lee AW. Emerging radiotherapy technologies and trends in nasopharyngeal cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:395-405. [PMID: 32745354 PMCID: PMC7494066 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Technology has always driven advances in radiotherapy treatment. In this review, we describe the main technological advances in radiotherapy over the past decades for the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and highlight some of the pressing issues and challenges that remain. We aim to identify emerging trends in radiation medicine. These include advances in personalized medicine and advanced imaging modalities, standardization of planning and delineation, assessment of treatment response and adaptive re‐planning, impact of particle therapy, and role of artificial intelligence or automation in clinical care. In conclusion, we expect significant improvement in the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy treatment for NPC over the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Tseng
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Yiat Horng Leong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Lea Choung Wong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Ivan Wk Tham
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Timothy Cheo
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Anne Wm Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ho HW, Lee SP, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Yang CC, Lin YW. Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc techniques in salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:164. [PMID: 32641082 PMCID: PMC7346374 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01602-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate dosimetric differences of salvage irradiations using two commercially available volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques: RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA), for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after initial radiation therapy. Methods Ten patients with recurrent NPC status previously treated with radiation therapy were considered suitable candidates for salvage SBRT using VMAT approach. Two separate treatment plans were created with HA and RA techniques for each case, with dosimetric outcomes compared with respect to tumor target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing. Furthermore, the cumulative radiobiological effects to the relevant OARs from the original radiotherapy to the respective salvage SBRT plans were analyzed in terms of biologically effective dose (BED). Results Treatment with HA exhibited similar target dose coverage as with RA, while delivering a higher mean dose to the targets. Using RA technique, the mean maximal doses to optic apparatus and the mean brain dose were reduced by 1 to 1.5 Gy, comparing to HA technique. The conformity index, gradient radius, and intermediate dose spillage in HA plans were significantly better than those in RA. With HA technique, the volume of brain receiving 12 Gy or more was reduced by 44%, comparing to RA technique. The cumulative BEDs to spinal cord and optic apparatus with RA technique were 1 to 2 Gy3 less than those with HA. HA technique significantly reduced the volume within body that received more than 100 Gy. Conclusions With better dose distribution than RA while maintaining sufficient target dose coverage, HA represents an attractive salvage SBRT technique for recurrent NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Steve P Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hisu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan.,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Jhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan. .,Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu K, Lin S, Ke L, Xia W, Zhang C, Li J, Gao M, Qiang M, Chen X, Liu J, Xie C, Guo X, Lv X. Prognostic value and the potential role of treatment options for cervical lymph node necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2020; 109:104864. [PMID: 32604061 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There were few studies focused on the cervical lymph necrosis (CNN) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients to develop a nomogram and guide the treatment decision at the era of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS The prognostic accuracy of CNN in the training cohort (n = 1940) was validated in Guangzhou internal validation cohort (n = 832) and two external validation cohorts (Dongguan, n = 232; Foshan, n = 134). RESULTS The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. After a median 60.0 months' follow-up, patients with CNN in the training cohort had worse 5-year PFS (70.8% vs. 89.1%, P < 0.001) than patients without CNN, which was validated in the validation cohorts. The nomogram based on CNN predicted an individual PFS risk (training: C-index 0.733; Guangzhou validation: C-index 0.736; Foshan: C-index 0.722; Dongguan: C-index 0.756). Stage N2 patients in the CNN group and stage IV patients no matter the status of CNN, PFS was better with induction chemotherapy (ICT) and CCRT than CCRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Taken together, CNN reliably predicts survival risk in NPC patients. N2 patients in the CNN group and stage IV patients may receive survival benefit from ICT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuiyuan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Siting Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Liangru Ke
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Weixiong Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan 523000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianpeng Li
- Department of Radiology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan 523000, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingyong Gao
- Department of Radiology, Foshan No.1 People's Hospital, Foshan 528000, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengyun Qiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xi Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Intensive Care Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuanmiao Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xing Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Du Y, Zhang W, Lei F, Yu X, Li Z, Liu X, Ni Y, Deng L, Ji M. Long-Term Survival After Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment in a Local Prefecture-Level Hospital in Southern China. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:1329-1338. [PMID: 32158265 PMCID: PMC7047969 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s237278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose NPC is a malignant and invasive tumor with the incidence rate of 19/100,000 per year in Zhongshan City, a prefecture city in southern China. Long-term survival analysis on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based treatment in local prefecture-level hospitals have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the 5-year clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of NPC treated with IMRT in Zhongshan City People's Hospital (ZSPH), a prefecture-level hospital in South China. Patients and Methods The number of 149 newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC cases treated with IMRT were included from Zhongshan City People's Hospital between January 2010 and December 2011. The survival outcomes, treatment toxicities and prognostic factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Results With a median follow-up period of 65 months for the cohort, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were 86.80%, 94.80%, 86.10% and 80.50%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 100%, 95.2%, 87% and 67.2% for stage I, II, II and IVa-b, respectively (P=0.004). The 5-year LRFS rates were 97.2%, 96.0%, 90.4% and 72.0% for T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively (P=0.001); the 5-year DMFS rates were 100% for T1, 96.8% for T2, 81.9% for T3 and 74.6% for T4 (P=0.022). A multivariate analysis revealed tumor stage as an independent prognostic factor for LRFS, DMFS and OS. No patients died from acute toxicities. Late toxicities were observed for 130 (87.2%) patients, and most late toxicities were graded I/II. Conclusion NPC treatment effect in a prefecture-level hospital in South China was comparable to international results and toxicities were tolerable. Tumour stage was an independent prognostic factor for survival outcome. More NPC survival data from local and remote places are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Du
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wentong Zhang
- Department of Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Lei
- Department of Radiotherapy, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xia Yu
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhuming Li
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaodong Liu
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanan Ni
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Deng
- Department of Radiotherapy, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingfang Ji
- Cancer Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Machine Learning Analysis of Image Data Based on Detailed MR Image Reports for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Prognosis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:8068913. [PMID: 32149139 PMCID: PMC7054759 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8068913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the use of automatic machine learning (AutoML) algorithm based on magnetic resonance (MR) image data to assign prediction scores to patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We also aimed to develop a 4-group classification system for NPC, superior to the current clinical staging system. Between January 2010 and January 2013, 792 patients with recent diagnosis of NPC, who had MR image data, were enrolled in the study. The AutoML algorithm was used and all statistical analyses were based on the 10-fold test. Primary endpoints included the probabilities of overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local-region relapse-free survival (LRFS), and their sum was recorded as the final voting score, representative of progression-free survival (PFS) for each patient. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve generated from the MR image data-based model compared with the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) system-based model was 0.796 (P=0.008) for OS, 0.752 (P=0.053) for DMFS, and 0.721 (P=0.025) for LRFS. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) test values for II/I, III/II, IV/III groups in our new machine learning-based scoring system were 0.011, 0.010, and <0.001, respectively, whereas those for II/I, III/II, IV/III groups in the TNM/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system were 0.118, 0.121, and <0.001, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the new machine learning-based scoring system analysis of each curve (P < 0.05), whereas the P values of curves obtained from the TNM/AJCC system, between II/I and III/II, were 0.118 and 0.121, respectively, without a significant difference. In conclusion, the AutoML algorithm demonstrated better prognostic performance than the TNM/AJCC system for NPC. The algorithm showed a good potential for clinical application and may aid in improving counseling and facilitate the personalized management of patients with NPC. The clinical application of our new scoring and staging system may significantly improve precision medicine.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhuang Y, Han J, Chen L, Liu X. Dose-volume histogram prediction in volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinomas based on uniform-intensity radiation with equal angle intervals. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:23NT03. [PMID: 31683261 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we developed a gated recurrent unit (GRU)-based recurrent neural network (RNN) for dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPCs) based on uniform-intensity radiation with equal angle intervals and investigated the feasibility and usefulness of this method for treatment optimization. One hundred twenty-four NPC patients were selected from a database containing clinical VMAT plans from 2015 to 2018; of these, the data from 100 patients were used to train the GRU-RNN, and the data of the other 24 patients were used for testing. For the prescribed doses to D95 (the absorbed dose for 95% of the planning target volume) of all the plans in 30 or 31 fractions, 70 Gy were delivered to PTV70 (the gross tumour volume with circumferential margin), 60 Gy were delivered to PTV60, 54 Gy were delivered to PTV54 and 66 Gy were delivered to PTV66 (lymph node gross tumour volume with circumferential margin). For each NPC patient, an equal-field-weight conformal radiotherapy plan was generated by a treatment planning system (TPS) to offer uniform-intensity radiation. By adjusting the field weights, the dose distribution induced by individual conformal beams was acquired, and the corresponding DVH was calculated. Direction-dependent DVHs were employed to predict the DVH for VMAT with the GRU-RNN, and the regenerated VMAT experimental plans (EPs), guided by the predicted DVHs, were evaluated by comparing them with the clinical plans (CPs). For the 24 test patients, the regenerated EPs guided by the GRU-RNN predictive model achieved good consistency relative to the CPs. The EPs resulted in better dose sparing for many organs at risk (OARs) while still meeting the acceptable criteria for the PTVs. Significant differences were found in the maximum/mean doses to the optic nerves, temporal lobes, lenses, mandibles, temporomandibular joints (TMJs), larynx and inner ears, with P-values of 0.03, 0.01, 0.01, <0.01, 0.02, 0.02 and <0.01, respectively. On average, compared to the CPs, the maximum/mean doses to these OARs were altered by -1.38 Gy, -0.92 Gy, 0.53 Gy, -1.19 Gy, -1.16 Gy, 2.39 Gy and -1.71 Gy, respectively. The results showed the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed uniform-intensity radiation approach. The regenerated plans guided by the predictive method were not inferior to the manual plans, indicating their great potential for improved planning and quality control in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongdong Zhuang
- School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 Xin Gang Road West, Guangzhou, 510275, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gou X, Duan B, Shi H, Qin L, Xiao J, Chen N. The relations of dosimetric parameters with long-term outcomes and late toxicities in advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma with IMRT. Head Neck 2019; 42:85-92. [PMID: 31650657 PMCID: PMC6973082 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Balancing the dose requirements between targets and normal tissue is a challenge in radiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes in NPC. METHODS We presented a retrospective review of patients with T3-4 NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patient characteristics, dosimetric parameters, and the follow-up data for survival and late toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were 83.0%, 90.1%, and 82.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the volume of involved lymph node was an independent prognostic factor. The volume of primary tumor and the maximal dose were significant factors affecting temporal lobe injury. CONCLUSIONS IMRT provided satisfactory local control for advanced T-stage NPC, with acceptable late toxicities. The dose constraint criteria of selected critical structures can be appropriately loosen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxia Gou
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Baofeng Duan
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Huashan Shi
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lei Qin
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nianyong Chen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liang ZG, Tan HQ, Zhang F, Rui Tan LK, Lin L, Lenkowicz J, Wang H, Wen Ong EH, Kusumawidjaja G, Phua JH, Gan SA, Sin SY, Ng YY, Tan TW, Soong YL, Fong KW, Park SY, Soo KC, Wee JT, Zhu XD, Valentini V, Boldrini L, Sun Y, Chua ML. Comparison of radiomics tools for image analyses and clinical prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190271. [PMID: 31453720 PMCID: PMC6774600 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Radiomics pipelines have been developed to extract novel information from radiological images, which may help in phenotypic profiling of tumours that would correlate to prognosis. Here, we compared two publicly available pipelines for radiomics analyses on head and neck CT and MRI in nasopharynx cancer (NPC). Methods and materials: 100 biopsy-proven NPC cases stratified by T- and N-categories were enrolled in this study. Two radiomics pipeline, Moddicom (v. 0.51) and Pyradiomics (v. 2.1.2) were used to extract radiomics features of CT and MRI. Segmentation of primary gross tumour volume was performed using Velocity v. 4.0 by consensus agreement between three radiation oncologists. Intraclass correlation between common features of the two pipelines was analysed by Spearman’s rank correlation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to determine association between radiomics features and clinical parameters. Results: We observed a high proportion of correlated features in the CT data set, but not for MRI; 76.1% (51 of 67 common between Moddicom and Pyradiomics) of CT features and 28.6% (20 of 70 common) of MRI features were significantly correlated. Of these, 100% were shape-related for both CT and MRI, 100 and 23.5% were first-order-related, 61.9 and 19.0% were texture-related, respectively. This interpipeline heterogeneity affected the downstream clustering with known prognostic clinical parameters of cTN-status and GTVp. Nonetheless, shape features were the most reproducible predictors of clinical parameters among the different radiomics modules. Conclusion: Here, we highlighted significant heterogeneity between two publicly available radiomics pipelines that could affect the downstream association with prognostic clinical factors in NPC Advances in knowledge: The present study emphasized the broader importance of selecting stable radiomics features for disease phenotyping, and it is necessary prior to any investigation of multicentre imaging datasets to validate the stability of CT-related radiomics features for clinical prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-Guo Liang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China.,Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fan Zhang
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lloyd Kuan Rui Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Lin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | | | - Haitao Wang
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Enya Hui Wen Ong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Jun Hao Phua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soon Ann Gan
- Division of Cancer Informatics, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sze Yarn Sin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yan Yee Ng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Terence Wee Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Kam Weng Fong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khee-Chee Soo
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Joseph Tien Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China
| | | | | | - Ying Sun
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Melvin Lee Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang C, Wang F, Min X, Zhang Q, Shen LJ, Jiang Y, Yan J. Toxicities of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2019; 47:2832-2847. [PMID: 31272262 PMCID: PMC6683919 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519858031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We investigated the risk of acute and late toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharynx carcinoma (NPC). Methods In this meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In addition to the incidence of specific toxicities, risk ratios (RRs) or odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using fixed-effect or random-effects models. Results In total, 11 RCTs involving 2801 patients with NPC were included in this analysis. For grade ≥3 adverse events, patients who received CCRT treatment had a higher proportion of acute mucositis (39.9% vs. 30.5%, RR=1.30, 95%CI, 1.16–1.46) acute nausea and vomiting (RR=6.26, 95% CI: 2.01–19.45), and neutropenia (RR=30.86, 95% CI: 7.36 to 129.35). For late severe toxicities, CCRT treatment was significantly associated with higher incidence of hearing loss (116.56% vs. 411.43%, RR=1.461, 95%CI, 1.043–21.095). The incidence of acute nausea and vomiting was more frequent in patients receiving CCRT. Conclusion Compared with radiotherapy alone, CCRT increases the risk of severe acute toxicities (mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and neutropenia) and severe late toxicity (hearing loss) in patients with NPC. However, larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Wang
- 1 Oncology Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Wang
- 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Min
- 1 Oncology Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Qinfang Zhang
- 1 Oncology Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Juan Shen
- 3 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Jiang
- 1 Oncology Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Yan
- 1 Oncology Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu F, Luo T, Jin T, Zhang J, Xiang Z, Yan R, Xie L, Wu X, Zhang H, Wang F, Li P, Liu L. Advantages of using reduced-volume intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective paired study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:554. [PMID: 31176358 PMCID: PMC6556221 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5774-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The definition of clinical target volume (CTV) in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been addressed. We performed this study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using IMRT with reduced-volume CTV for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 293 non-metastatic NPC patients treated with IMRT from 2002 to 2013. A total of 180 matched cases finally included with 90 received conventional-volume IMRT (CV-IMRT) and 90 received reduced-volume IMRT (RV-IMRT). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare NPC-specific survival. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were conducted to detect independent predictors. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 70 months, the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 88.9, 84.4, 92.2, 91.1, 98.9, 91.1% for the CV-IMRT arm and 92.2, 85.6, 90.0, 93.3, 98.9, 93.3% for the RV-IMRT arm, respectively. None significant survival difference was observed. Additionally, RV-IMRT was associated with reduced risk of late xerostomia (P = 0.039) and hearing loss (P = 0.008), compared versus CV-IMRT. CONCLUSIONS The use of RV-IMRT for the treatment of NPC led to comparable survival condition and truly reduced toxicity reactions compared versus CV-IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Ting Luo
- Mammary Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Center for Breast, Cancer Center, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Tao Jin
- Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Zhongzheng Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Ruonan Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Li Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Franzese C, Fogliata A, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Cozzi L, Tomatis S, De Virgilio A, Spriano G, Scorsetti M. Impact of hypofractionated schemes in radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:E163-E170. [PMID: 31063588 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze two cohorts of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with two schedules of hypofractionated radiotherapy and 5 versus 3 mm clinical target volume-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins. METHODS 145 patients were included. The patient cohort was divided into two groups. Group A included 97 patients treated with 69.96/54.45 grays (Gy) to the high-risk and low-risk volumes, respectively, in 33 fractions, with 5 mm margins. Group B included 48 patients treated with 66/54 Gy in 30 fractions using 3 mm margins. Toxicity was recorded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. Patient outcomes for locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS Median follow-up was 26 months. In terms of toxicity, acute dysphagia worsened significantly (P = 0.003) in group B, whereas acute salivary toxicity tended to significance (P = 0.071). No significant late toxicity differences were recorded. Rates of LRC at 1 and 2 years were 90.1% ± 2.6% and 84.2% ± 3.4%, respectively, with superiority for group A (P = 0.045). The statistical significance remained for the low-dose level (P = 0.007) but not for high dose (P = 0.110). Rates of DFS at 1 and 2 years were 84.9% ± 3.1% and 76.5% ± 3.9%, respectively, whereas rates of OS were 95.9% ± 1.8% and 91.6% ± 2.7%, respectively. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of DFS (P = 0.270) and OS (P = 0.152). CONCLUSION The use of reduced CTV to PTV margins and dose reduction with hypofractionation schedule can improve the pattern of toxicity in LAHNC patients. This approach resulted in an increased rate of locoregional progression, particularly in low-risk regions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E163-E170, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Biomedical Science Department, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Biomedical Science Department, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Biomedical Science Department, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wei Z, Zhang Z, Luo J, Li N, Peng X. Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:1857-1864. [PMID: 31062162 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the value of concurrent chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), we performed this retrospective cohort study to compare the efficiency and toxicities of induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone (IC + RT) versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT). METHOD We analyzed data from patients with locoregionally advanced NPC (stage III-IVb) who were treated at the West China hospital between January 2008 and December 2014. Patients received docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) IC followed by IMRT alone (IC + RT group) or IMRT plus cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy (IC + CCRT group). The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), which was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify potential independent prognostic factors. Treatment-associated toxicities were compared between groups using the Chi squared test. RESULTS A total of 78 patients treated with IC + RT and 76 with IC + CCRT were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 59 months (range: 7-108 months). There was no difference between patients treated with IC + RT and IC + CCRT in terms of 3-year OS (89.0% versus 88.0%, p = 0.286), progression-free survival (76.8% versus 80.0%, p = 0.142), locoregional recurrence-free survival (87.1% versus 90.5%, p = 0.156), or distant metastasis-free survival (83.6% versus 82.6%, p = 0.567). Treatment (IC + RT versus IC + CCRT) was not an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.425, 95% CI 0.698-2.908; p = 0.331). IC + CCRT was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia than IC + RT during radiotherapy (11.8% versus 1.3%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION IC plus IMRT alone achieves similar patient survival outcomes as IC plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and has a lower incidence of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigong Wei
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.,The Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University and Xi'An No. 3 Hospital, Xi'An, 710016, Shaanxi, China.,Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhengfang Zhang
- Department of Head and Neck, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingwen Luo
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Nan Li
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lin Y, Ouyang Y, Lu Z, Liu Y, Chen K, Cao X. Long-Term Outcomes of Three-Dimensional High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Locally Recurrent Early T-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:278. [PMID: 31134143 PMCID: PMC6524703 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brachytherapy (BT) is one of the techniques available for retreatment of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyng eal carcinoma (rNPC). In this study, we evaluated the treatment outcome and late toxicities of three-dimensional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (3D-HDR-BT) for patients with locally rNPC. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 36 patients with histologically confirmed rNPC from 2004 to 2011. Of the 36 patients, 17 underwent combined-modality treatment (CMT) consisting of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by 3D-HDR-BT, while the other 19 underwent 3D-HDR-BT alone. The median dose of EBRT for the CMT group was 60 (range, 50-66) Gy, with an additional median dose of BT of 16 (range, 9-20) Gy. The median dose for the 3D-HDR-BT group was 32 (range, 20-36) Gy. The measured treatment outcomes were the 5- and 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities. Results: The median age at recurrence was 44.5 years. The median follow-up period was 70 (range, 6-142) months. The 5-year LRFS, DFS, and OS for the entire patient group were 75.4, 55.6, and 74.3%, respectively, while the 10-year LRFS, DFS, and OS for the entire patient group were 75.4, 44.2, and 53.7%, respectively. The 10-year LRFS in the CMT group was higher than that in the 3D-HDR-BT-alone group (93.8 vs. 58.8%, HR: 7.595, 95%CI: 1.233-61.826, p = 0.025). No grade 4 late radiotherapy-induced toxicities were observed. Conclusions: 3D-HDR-BT achieves favorable clinical outcomes with mild late toxicity in patients with locally rNPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanzhu Lin
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Ouyang
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyuan Lu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Liu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinping Cao
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huang CJ, Huang MY, Shih MCP, Cheng KY, Lee KW, Lu TY, Yuan SS, Fang PT. Post-radiation sinusitis is associated with recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:61. [PMID: 30971260 PMCID: PMC6458621 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1261-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the impact of post-radiation sinusitis on the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS Two hundred and thirty patients with non-metastatic NPC were analyzed in terms of freedom from local failure (FFLF), freedom from distant failure (FFDF), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). For each patient, the status of the sinus mucosa was flexibly assessed by documenting mucosal changes as indicated by differences between images obtained before radiotherapy and more than 6 months post-radiation. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 39.7 months (8 to 81 months), 19 (8.26%) patients relapsed locally, 13 (5.65%) patients failed in the neck, and 26 (11.3%) patients developed distant metastases. The presence of sinusitis noted in images post-radiation was a significant predictor for DFS (p = 0.001), FFLF (p = 0.004), and FFDF (p = 0.015), in addition to having high negative predictive value for local relapse (97.5%). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to investigate the prognostic value of post-radiation sinusitis in NPC patients treated with IMRT. Post-radiation sinusitis was found to be a significant predictor for DFS, FFLF, and FFDF, and was also found to have high negative predictive value for local recurrence (97.5%). It may thus be used as an additional tool for clinicians to determine the possibility of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Jen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No.100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807 Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yii Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No.100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807 Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chen Paul Shih
- Department of Medical imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kai-yuan Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wo Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Ying Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No.100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807 Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shyng-Shiou Yuan
- Translational Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Pen-Tzu Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No.100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, 807 Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lin L, Dou Q, Jin YM, Zhou GQ, Tang YQ, Chen WL, Su BA, Liu F, Tao CJ, Jiang N, Li JY, Tang LL, Xie CM, Huang SM, Ma J, Heng PA, Wee JTS, Chua MLK, Chen H, Sun Y. Deep Learning for Automated Contouring of Primary Tumor Volumes by MRI for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Radiology 2019; 291:677-686. [PMID: 30912722 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) may be cured with radiation therapy. Tumor proximity to critical structures demands accuracy in tumor delineation to avoid toxicities from radiation therapy; however, tumor target contouring for head and neck radiation therapy is labor intensive and highly variable among radiation oncologists. Purpose To construct and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) contouring tool to automate primary gross tumor volume (GTV) contouring in patients with NPC. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, MRI data sets covering the nasopharynx from 1021 patients (median age, 47 years; 751 male, 270 female) with NPC between September 2016 and September 2017 were collected and divided into training, validation, and testing cohorts of 715, 103, and 203 patients, respectively. GTV contours were delineated for 1021 patients and were defined by consensus of two experts. A three-dimensional convolutional neural network was applied to 818 training and validation MRI data sets to construct the AI tool, which was tested in 203 independent MRI data sets. Next, the AI tool was compared against eight qualified radiation oncologists in a multicenter evaluation by using a random sample of 20 test MRI examinations. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the difference of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of pre- versus post-AI assistance. Results The AI-generated contours demonstrated a high level of accuracy when compared with ground truth contours at testing in 203 patients (DSC, 0.79; 2.0-mm difference in average surface distance). In multicenter evaluation, AI assistance improved contouring accuracy (five of eight oncologists had a higher median DSC after AI assistance; average median DSC, 0.74 vs 0.78; P < .001), reduced intra- and interobserver variation (by 36.4% and 54.5%, respectively), and reduced contouring time (by 39.4%). Conclusion The AI contouring tool improved primary gross tumor contouring accuracy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which could have a positive impact on tumor control and patient survival. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Lin
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Qi Dou
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Yue-Ming Jin
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Yi-Qiang Tang
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Wei-Lin Chen
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Bao-An Su
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Feng Liu
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Chang-Juan Tao
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Ning Jiang
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Jun-Yun Li
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Chuan-Miao Xie
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Shao-Min Huang
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Jun Ma
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Pheng-Ann Heng
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Hao Chen
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| | - Ying Sun
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology (L.L., G.Q.Z., J.Y.L., L.L.T., S.M.H., J.M., Y.S.) and Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center (C.M.X.), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (Q.D., Y.M.J., P.A.H., H.C.); Imsight Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China (H.C.); Divisions of Radiation Oncology (J.T.S.W., M.L.K.C.) and Medical Sciences (M.L.K.C.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore (M.L.K.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China (Y.Q.T.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China (W.L.C.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China (B.A.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China (F.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (C.J.T.); and Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China (N.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Luo WJ, Feng YF, Guo R, Tang LL, Chen L, Zhou GQ, Li WF, Liu X, Sun Y, Lin AH, Ma J, Mao YP. Patterns of EBV-positive cervical lymph node involvement in head and neck cancer and implications for the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma T0 classification. Oral Oncol 2019; 91:7-12. [PMID: 30926066 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive cervical lymph node (CLN) metastasis of unknown primary origin is classified as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) T0 by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (8th edition). We aimed to investigate the possible primary sites and patterns of EBV-positive CLN metastases and to provide implications for the management of NPC T0 classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 269 patients with newly diagnosed EBV-positive CLN metastatic disease who underwent EBV detection via EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization. Fifteen patients with unknown primary tumors underwent follow-up after initial treatment. RESULTS In patients with EBV-positive CLNs, the most common primary sites after the nasopharynx (51.7%) were the salivary gland (24.5%), lung (7.8%), oropharynx (3.3%), nasal cavity/maxillary (3.3%), oral cavity (2.2%), orbit (1.1%), and liver (0.4%). No primary site was found in 15 patients (5.6%). For salivary gland malignancies, level II and I were the most frequently involved regions. Tumors arising from the lung or liver metastasized to the lower neck (level IV, V, and VI) rather than the upper neck. After initial treatment, 2/15 patients with EBV-positive CLNs of unknown primary exhibited primary NPC and oropharyngeal tumor, respectively. Further, even without prophylactic irradiation to the nasopharynx, only one of 13 unknown primary patients developed NPC. CONCLUSIONS The origins of EBV-positive CLNs may not be restricted to the nasopharynx alone, and are likely to involve the head and neck or non-head and neck regions. NPC T0 classification should be cautiously assigned to such tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Jie Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Fen Feng
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ai-Hua Lin
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huang J, Kong FF, Oei RW, Zhai RP, Hu CS, Ying HM. Dosimetric predictors of temporal lobe injury after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a competing risk study. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:31. [PMID: 30736809 PMCID: PMC6368802 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1229-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 03/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), death may occur prior to the occurrence of temporal lobe injury (TLI). Because such competing risk death precludes the occurrence of TLI and thus the competing risk analysis should be applied to TLI research. The aim was to investigate the incidence and predictive factors of TLI after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) among T4 NPC patients. METHODS From March 2008 to December 2014, T4 NPC patients treated with full-course radical IMRT at our center were reviewed retrospectively. A nested case-control study was designed for this cohort of patients. The cases were patients with TLI diagnosed by MRI during the follow-up period, and the controls were patients without TLI after IMRT matched 1:1 to each case by gender, age at diagnosis, intercranial involvement, and follow-up time. The end point was time to TLI or death without prior TLI. We analyzed the cumulative incidence function (CIF) and performed a competing risk regression model to identify the predictors of TLI. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, 63 patients (63/506, 12.5%) developed TLI as diagnosed by MRI, and 136 deaths occurred during the period. The cumulative incidence of TLI at 5 years was 13.2%, while 26.7% died without prior TLI. The univariate analysis showed that all selected dosimetric parameters were associated with the occurrence of TLI. On multivariate analysis, D1cc and V20 remained statistically significant. Based on the area-under-the-curve (AUC) values, D1cc was considered the most predictive. The patients with D1cc > 71.14 Gy had a 7.920-fold increased risk of TLI compared with those with D1cc ≤71.14 Gy (P < 0.05). Similarly, V20 > 42.22 cc was found to result in a statistically significant higher risk of TLI (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] =3.123, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS TL D1cc and V20 were predictive of TLI after IMRT for T4 NPC. They should be considered as first and second priorities of dose constraints of the TL. D1cc ≤71.14 Gy and V20 ≤ 42.22 cc could be useful dose-volume constraints for reducing the occurrence of TLI during IMRT treatment planning without obviously compromising the tumor coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang-Fang Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ronald Wihal Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rui-Ping Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Mei Ying
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jeong Y, Lee SW. Tumor volume/metabolic information can improve the prognostication of anatomy based staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer? Evaluation of the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2018; 36:295-303. [PMID: 30630268 PMCID: PMC6361247 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2018.00430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated prognostic value of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union for Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer and investigated whether tumor volume/metabolic information refined prognostication of anatomy based staging system. Materials and Methods One hundred thirty-three patients with nasopharyngeal cancer who were staged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) between 2004 and 2013 were reviewed. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic value of the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system and other factors including gross tumor volume and maximum standardized uptake value of primary tumor (GTV-T and SUV-T). Results Median follow-up period was 63 months. In multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), stage group (stage I-II vs. III-IVA) was the only significant prognostic factor. However, 5-year OS rates were not significantly different between stage I and II (100% vs. 96.2%), and between stage III and IVA (80.1% vs. 71.7%). Although SUV-T and GTV-T were not significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, those improved prognostication of stage group. The 5-year OS rates were significantly different between stage I-II, III-IV (SUV-T ≤ 16), and III-IV (SUV-T > 16) (97.2% vs. 78% vs. 53.8%), and between stage I, II-IV (GTV-T ≤ 33 mL), and II-IV (GTV-T > 33 mL) (100% vs. 87.3% vs. 66.7%). Conclusion Current anatomy based staging system has limitations on prognostication for nasopharyngeal cancer despite the most accurate assessment of tumor extent by MRI. Tumor volume/metabolic information seem to improve prognostication of current anatomy based staging system, and further studies are needed to confirm its clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Sang-Wook Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sun PY, Chen YH, Feng XB, Yang CX, Wu F, Wang RS. High-Dose Static and Dynamic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Improves Survival and Reduces Brainstem Toxicity. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24:8849-8859. [PMID: 30524119 PMCID: PMC6295138 DOI: 10.12659/msm.910465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard treatment for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). However, the dose-volume criteria for adjacent anatomically normal organs at risk (OARs) remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of higher than conventional doses of static and dynamic IMRT on the locoregional control of NPC, patient survival, and brainstem radiation toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients (n=186) with stage III and stage IVa NPC underwent high-dose static and dynamic IMRT treatment (68-76.96 Gy) with or without chemotherapy for 34-57 days. Overall survival (OS), the presence of distant metastases, and brainstem toxicity were assessed. One-year, three-year, and five-year follow-up was performed. RESULTS High-dose IMRT alone or in combination with chemotherapy resulted in a 100% objective response rate and significantly improved OS rates, with one-year, three-year, and five-year OS rates of 94.1%, 89.8%, and 88.2%, respectively. The local recurrence rate (17.6%), and distant metastasis to the lung, liver, and bone (17.2%), and mortality (n=22) were reduced. Chemotherapy was the only factor that was significantly correlated with patient survival. Brainstem toxicity was reduced in patients treated with static IMRT (0.07%) and dynamic IMRT (0.08%). There were 26 additional factors that were not found to significantly affect brainstem toxicity. CONCLUSIONS High-dose static or dynamic IMRT combined with chemotherapy improved survival and reduces distal metastasis with a very low occurrence of brainstem toxicity in patients with locally advanced NPC. These findings might provide therapeutic guidance for clinicians when planning optimal dose-volume IMRT parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pi-Yun Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).,Liuzhou Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Yan-Hua Chen
- Liuzhou Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Xian-Bin Feng
- Liuzhou Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Chun-Xu Yang
- Liuzhou Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Fang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Ren-Sheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).,Guangxi Cancer Radiation Oncology Clinical Research Center, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wu M, He X, Hu C. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with sequential cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13361. [PMID: 30557987 PMCID: PMC6320135 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with induction-adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).A total of 91 biopsy-proven NPC patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received induction chemotherapy (IC) consisting of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1 to 3, and 5-Fu 2500 mg/m as an intravenous infusion over 120 hours every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. Adjuvant chemotherapy of the same regime was given 28 days after the end of IMRT.A total of 87 patients completed 2 cycles of IC. During adjuvant chemotherapy phase, 74.7% patients received at least 1 cycle. With a median follow-up time of 45 months (10-123 months), the 5-year local control, regional control, distant metastasis-free (DMF) and overall survival (OS) rates were 84.1%, 86.9%, 81.3%, and 74.4%, respectively. The 5-year local control rates for patients with Stage T1-2 and T3-4 was 94.6% and 76.5%, respectively (P = .045). The 5-year DMF rates for patients with N0-1 and N2-3 diseases were 90.6% and 73.3%, respectively (P = .072). During radiotherapy (RT), 24.2% patients suffered severe acute mucositis (grade 3-4). Severe late toxicities included cranial nerve palsy in 1 patient and grade 3 hearing impairment in 1 patient.IMRT combined with induction-adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of PF regimen is well tolerated and provides satisfactory local-regional control for locoregionally advanced NPC. Further treatment strategies to control distant metastasis are needed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyao Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Xue F, Ou D, Hu C, He X. Local regression and control of T1-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2018; 7:6010-6019. [PMID: 30406969 PMCID: PMC6308044 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To observe the local regression and control in T1-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to analyze the related influencing factors. METHODS Between January 2006 and June 2014, 247 consecutive T1-2 NPC patients treated with IMRT were retrospectively analyzed, with 126 (51.0%) N0-1 disease and 121 (49.0%) N2-3 disease. Among them, 72.9% received platinum-based chemotherapy. The prescribed dose to gross tumor volume was 66 Gy/30 fractions. RESULTS By the end of IMRT, the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group had higher local complete response (CR) rate compared with IMRT alone group (92.2% vs 74.6%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was discovered in 5-year local control (LC) rate (95.1% vs 94.9%, P = 0.968). Of the rest 31 patients with residual nasopharyngeal lesions after IMRT, those received boost irradiation (67.7%) also showed no improvement in 5-year LC rate compared with the observational group (95.0% vs 100.0%, P = 0.307). With a median follow-up of 63 months, the estimated 5-year LC rate for the whole group was 95.1% (T1 vs T2: 95.9% vs 94.7%, P = 0.186). Prognostic factors for LC were found neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis. Advanced N stage was found to be the only adverse prognostic factor for all the other survivals. CONCLUSIONS Excellent LC could be achieved in T1-2 NPC treated with IMRT. The addition of chemotherapy may offer short-term response benefit, but no significant LC benefit, so did boost irradiation. Attention should be attached to advanced N stage, the exploration of the recurrence-related factors, and the necessities of the additional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fen Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Ou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiayun He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Salvage Surgery in the Treatment of Local Recurrences of Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
40
|
Cirugía de rescate en las recidivas locales del carcinoma de nasofaringe. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2018; 69:339-344. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
41
|
Guo R, Tang LL, Mao YP, Du XJ, Chen L, Zhang ZC, Liu LZ, Tian L, Luo XT, Xie YB, Ren J, Sun Y, Ma J. Proposed modifications and incorporation of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA improve the TNM staging system for Epstein-Barr virus-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2018; 125:79-89. [PMID: 30351466 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients who have Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in which the tumor tissues harbor EBV have a better prognosis than those without EBV-related NPC. Therefore, the eighth edition of the TNM staging system could be modified for EBV-related NPC by incorporating the measurement of plasma EBV DNA. METHODS In total, 979 patients with NPC who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were retrospectively reviewed. Recursive partitioning analysis was conducted based on tumor (T) classification, lymph node (N) classification, and EBV DNA measurement to derive objectively the proposed stage groupings. The validity of the proposed stage groupings was confirmed in a prospective cohort of 550 consecutive patients who also received with IMRT. RESULTS The pretreatment plasma EBV DNA level was identified as a significant, negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival and overall survival in univariate analysis (all P < .001) and multivariate analysis (all P < .05). Recursive partitioning analysis of the primary cohort to incorporate EBV DNA generated the following proposed stage groupings: stage RI (T1N0), RIIA (T2-T3N0 or T1-T3N1, EBV DNA ≤2000 copies/mL), stage RIIB (T2-T3N0 or T1-T3N1, EBV DNA >2000 copies/mL; T1-T3N2, EBV DNA ≤2000 copies/mL), stage RIII (T1-T3N2, EBV DNA >2000 copies/mL; T4N0-N2), and stage RIVA (any T and N3). In the validation cohort, the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 100%, 87.9%, 76.7%, 68.7%, and 50.4% for proposed stage RI, RIIA, RIIB, RIII, and RIV NPC, respectively (P < .001). Compared with the eighth edition TNM stage groupings, the proposed stage groupings incorporating EBV DNA provided better hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, outcome prediction, and sample size balance. CONCLUSIONS The proposed stage groupings have better prognostic performance than the eighth edition of the TNM staging system. EBV DNA titers should be included in the TNM staging system to assess patients who have EBV-related NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Jing Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zi-Chen Zhang
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Tian
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Tong Luo
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Bin Xie
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Ren
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of High Performance Computing, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tatar A, Ozmen HK, Yoruk O. Evaluation of Volume of Nasopharyngeal Cancers by the Cavalieri Principle. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:2403-2407. [PMID: 30255692 PMCID: PMC6249478 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.9.2403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction of tumor volume using the Cavalieri method may be helpful in management of therapy and evaluation of treatment results. The aim of this study was to adapt the Cavalieri stereological method to magnetic resonance imaging for determining volume of nasopharyngeal cancers and assess changes after treatment using the Cavalieri method. Serial MRI images in the sagittal plane were obtained from a total of 33 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas (11 with stage T2, 11 with stage T3, and 11 with stage T4 lesions). The images were analyzed retrospectively before and two months following the cessation of radiochemotherapy for comparison. Average tumor volumes before and after treatment in patients with stage T2 were 21. 5±10.5 cm3 and 2.82±3.43 cm3, respectively (p=0.000). The respective figures were 35.1±19.0 cm3 and 6.27±7.82 cm3 (p=0.000) for stage T3 cases, and 62.8±27.8 cm3 and 11. 6±11.9 cm3 (p=0.000) for stage T4. Post-treatment tumor volumes were statistically reduced when compared to pre-treatment volumes in all stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Tatar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, Ataturk University, Turkey.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tan LSY, Wong B, Gangodu NR, Lee AZE, Kian Fong Liou A, Loh KS, Li H, Yann Lim M, Salazar AM, Lim CM. Enhancing the immune stimulatory effects of cetuximab therapy through TLR3 signalling in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7:e1500109. [PMID: 30377565 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1500109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cetuximab immunotherapy targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been used to treat nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) with some success. Therefore, combining an immune adjuvant to boost the immune microenvironment may improve its clinical efficacy. Herein, we investigate the immune-stimulatory effects of Poly-ICLC (a TLR3 agonist) in enhancing cetuximab-based immunotherapy and correlate these responses with FcɣRIIIa (V158F) or TLR3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs- L412F and C829T) expressed on immune effector cells. We observed high levels of TLR3 mRNA in NPC cells; and both TLR3 and EGFR expression were unaffected by Poly-ICLC treatment. Cetuximab plus Poly-ICLC significantly enhanced NK-mediated ADCC through up-regulation of CD107a and Granzyme B expression. This effect was independent of FcɣRIIIa-V158F and TLR3-L412F or TLR3-C829T polymorphisms expressed on NK cells. Additionally, IFN-ɣ expression and secretion were doubled following cetuximab plus poly-ICLC treatment; compared to either treatment alone. This effect was independent of TLR3 polymorphisms. Consequentially, adaptive immune responses were also seen with increased DC maturation (CD83), co-stimulatory molecules expression (CD80 and CD86) and increased frequency of EGFR-specific CD8 + T cells following Poly-ICLC treatment. The percentage of CD80+ CD83+ and CD83+ CD86+ DC was highest in the Poly-ICLC plus cetuximab group, compared to either treatment alone. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of Poly-ICLC in enhancing both cetuximab-mediated innate and adaptive anti-tumor immunity against NPC, which is independent of FcɣRIIIa-158, TLR3-L412F or TLR3-C829T polymorphisms. Additionally, Poly-ICLC does not downregulate EGFR expression on NPC cells and hence, will not dampen cetuximab anti-tumor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Soo Yee Tan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Wong
- Department of Pathology, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nagaraja Rao Gangodu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea Zhe Ern Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Anthony Kian Fong Liou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwok Seng Loh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ming Yann Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Chwee Ming Lim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liang H, Lv X, Wang L, Wu YS, Sun R, Ye YF, Ke LR, Yang Q, Yu YH, Qiu WZ, Liu GY, Huang XJ, Li WZ, Lv SH, Guo X, Xiang YQ, Xia WX. The plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level guides precision treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a large population-based cohort study from an endemic area. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018; 10:1758835918782331. [PMID: 30046357 PMCID: PMC6055246 DOI: 10.1177/1758835918782331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, the survival benefit of concurrent chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remains undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy compared with IMRT alone for LA-NPC patients with different plasma Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels. Methods: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database in an endemic area between November 2002 and December 2013. Cox proportional hazards models, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting models were established for survival analysis. Stratification analysis was performed based on interaction effects analysis. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed considering unmeasured confounders. Results: A total of 1357 eligible patients were enrolled (median follow up 62.4 months; range 3.5–155.8 months). No significant survival differences were observed between groups in the entire cohort. Notably, a significant interaction effect was observed between treatment regimens and EBV DNA levels. In patients with high EBV DNA levels (>4000 copies/ml), all three models showed that IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.521, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.218–5.216], disease-free survival (HR 2.168, 95% CI 1.349–3.483), and distant metastasis-free survival (HR 2.331, 95% CI 1.194–4.551) compared with IMRT alone. No differences were found in patients with low EBV DNA levels. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: In the IMRT era, concurrent chemotherapy treatment of LA-NPC patients with high EBV DNA levels is reasonable. However, the optimal regimen for LA-NPC patients with low EBV DNA levels needs further validation in randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Shan Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Fang Ye
- Clinical Trial Design Division, Clinical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liang-Ru Ke
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qin Yang
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya-Hui Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Ze Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Ying Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Jun Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wang-Zhong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shu-Hui Lv
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Xiong Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sommat K, Yit NLF, Wang F, Lim JHC. Impact of comorbidity on tolerability and survival following curative intent intensity modulated radiotherapy in older patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:352-358. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
46
|
Wang SY, Xu XW, Yao JJ, Peng PJ, Zhou B, Liu QD, Huang XP, Lin Z. Dose Escalation of Lobaplatin Concurrent with IMRT for the Treatment of Stage III-IVb NPC: A Phase I Clinical Trial. Transl Oncol 2018; 11:1007-1011. [PMID: 29966863 PMCID: PMC6039884 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lobaplatin as a single agent chemotherapy concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Asian population with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. From June 2016 to December 2017, 17 patients diagnosed with stage III-IVb NPC from an Asian population were prospectively enrolled. Patients were administered lobaplatin with 25-50 mg/m2 escalation of dosage on day 1. Every 21 days (days 1, 22, and 43) during radiotherapy, cycles were repeated. We administered radiotherapy as 2.12-2.27 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions each week for 6 to 7 weeks. The evaluation of lobaplatin-related toxic effects was based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. During the weekly treatment period, complete blood counts and biochemistry were performed. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were determined by the following events during any cycle in which lobaplatin was administered. Each dose group consisted of at least three cases. We proceeded to the subsequent dose group in the absence of DLT with a dose increment of 5 mg/m2 until DLT occurred. Periods from 1 week prior to the chemotherapy initiation to 3 weeks after the last chemotherapy were defined as DLT observation periods. MTD was determined by the dose that was immediately below the dose that produced DLT. After analysis, DLT occurred in three patients, including a group with two of three patients in 45 mg/m2 lobaplatin and another group with one of five patients in 40 mg/m2 lobaplatin. No grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in patients treated with lobaplatin <40 mg/m2. The tumor response rate at 12 weeks after treatment was 100%. In summary, lobaplatin concurrent with IMRT was active in stage III-IVb NPC, and the MTD for the lobaplatin as single-agent chemotherapy was 40 mg/m2 when combined with IMRT in an Asian population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03188497.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Yang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519001, China.
| | - Xi-Wei Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519001, China.
| | - Ji-Jin Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519001, China.
| | - Pei-Jian Peng
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519001, Guangdong Province, PR China.
| | - Bin Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519001, China.
| | - Qiao-Dan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province 519001, China.
| | - Xiao-Ping Huang
- Department of Out-patient, the Chronic Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, Zhuhai 519001, Guangdong Province, PR China.
| | - Zhong Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519001, Guangdong Province, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yang XL, Wang Y, Liang SB, He SS, Chen DM, Chen HY, Lu LX, Chen Y. Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:606. [PMID: 29843648 PMCID: PMC5975550 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4419-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, great improvement has been made in survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The 7th edition of the International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system seems “outdated ” as it mainly based on the study in 2D/3D era, and thus the 8th edition has made some amendments according to recent studies. We aimed to compare and evaluate these two editions of staging system for NPC in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Methods A total of 1317 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC treated with IMRT between 2009 and 2014 at two institutions were retrospectively assessed. All patients were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and restaged according to the 7th and 8th editions. Prognostic factors for local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was also used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR). Results In both 7th and 8th edition, insignificant difference could be observed between T2 and T3 disease, T2 and T4 disease (all P > 0.05) for LRFS, while the difference of LRFS between T3 and T4 disease was significant in the previous edition (P = 0.001) but insignificant (P = 0.279) after revision. For OS, highly similar survival curve could be seen between T2 and T3 disease in both edition (all P > 0.1). DMFS and OS were not significantly different between N3a and N1-3b categories of the 7th edition (all P > 0.05). In contrast, obvious segregation was observed between N3 and the other N categories after the revision and combination in the 8th edition (all P < 0.05). DFS and OS were not significantly different between stage IVA and IVB of the 7th edition (P = 0.057 and P = 0.365, respectively); therefore, combining these stages in the 8th edition was reasonable. Conclusion The overall stages and N categories of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system provide better segregation of survival outcomes than the 7th edition. The 8th edition is also more clinically applicable as it has reduced ambiguity and revised out-of-date definitions. However, the T categories need further optimizing as the 8th edition failed to solve the problem of similar survival between adjacent T-classification, which has been exited since 7th edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Li Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Shao-Bo Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, First People's Hospital of Foshan Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Sha-Sha He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan-Ming Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Yang Chen
- The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Xia Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yee-Lin V, Pooi-Fong W, Soo-Beng AK. Nutlin-3, A p53-Mdm2 Antagonist for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment. Mini Rev Med Chem 2018; 18:173-183. [PMID: 28714398 PMCID: PMC5769085 DOI: 10.2174/1389557517666170717125821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a form of head and neck cancer of multifactorial etiolo-gies that is highly prevalent among men in the population of Southern China and Southeast Asia. NPC has claimed many thousands of lives worldwide; but the low awareness of NPC remains a hindrance in early diagnosis and prevention of the disease. NPC is highly responsive to radiotherapy and chemothera-py, but radiocurable NPC is still dependent on concurrent treatment of megavoltage radiotherapy with chemotherapy. Despite a significant reduction in loco-regional and distant metastases, radiotherapy alone has failed to provide a significant improvement in the overall survival rate of NPC, compared to chemo-therapy. In addition, chemo-resistance persists as the major challenge in the management of metastatic NPC although the survival rate of advanced metastatic NPC has significantly improved with the admin-istration of chemotherapy adjunctive to radiotherapy. In this regard, targeted molecular therapy could be explored for the discovery of alternative NPC therapies. Nutlin-3, a small molecule inhibitor that specifi-cally targets p53-Mdm2 interaction offers new therapeutic opportunities by enhancing cancer cell growth arrest and apoptosis through the restoration of the p53-mediated tumor suppression pathway while pro-ducing minimal cytotoxicity and side effects. This review discusses the potential use of Nutlin-3 as a p53-activating drug and the future directions of its clinical research for NPC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Voon Yee-Lin
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
| | - Wong Pooi-Fong
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
| | - Alan Khoo Soo-Beng
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Cancer Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, 50588 Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jin T, Jiang F, Jin QF, Piao YF, Chen XZ. Endostar Combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: an Update. Transl Oncol 2018; 11:286-291. [PMID: 29413761 PMCID: PMC5884068 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A previous phase-2 trial to assess the addition of Endostar to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy showed that it improves prognosis in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (M-NPC) but the study cohort was small. We wished to update that phase-2 trial by enrolling an additional 44 patients and to assess the benefit of Endostar+GC chemotherapy. METHODS: An analysis of 72 M-NPC patients treated between July 2010 and November 2016 was done. The treatment regimen was a combination of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, cisplatin (80 mg/m2) on day 1, and Endostar (15 mg/day) from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-day cycle for ≥2 cycles. The acute toxic effects and therapeutic efficacy were analyzed. RESULTS: The response rate was 77.8%. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 12 and 19.5 months, respectively. A total of 329 cycles of GC and 288 cycles of Endostar were delivered to 72 patients, with the median number of four (range, 2–10) cycles administered per patient. The main grade-3/4 hematologic toxicities were leukopenia (54.1%) and neutropenia (59.8%). The number of non-hematologic adverse events was minimal. The regimen was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Endostar+GC chemotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated regimen for M-NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi-Feng Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong-Feng Piao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Zhong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology in Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lin L, Yao JJ, Zhou GQ, Guo R, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Xu L, Zhang LL, Lin AH, Ma J, Sun Y. The efficacy and toxicity of individualized intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on the tumor extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 7:20680-90. [PMID: 26980744 PMCID: PMC4991484 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using individualized clinical target volumes (CTVs) based on the loco-regional extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods From December 2009 to February 2012, 220 patients with histologically-proven, non-disseminated NPC were prospectively treated with IMRT according to an individualized delineation protocol. CTV1 encompassed the gross tumor volume, entire nasopharyngeal mucosa and structures within the pharyngobasilar fascia with a margin. CTV2 encompassed bilateral high risk anatomic sites and downstream anatomic sites adjacent to primary tumor, bilateral retropharyngeal regions, levels II, III and Va, and prophylactic irradiation was gave to one or two levels beyond clinical lymph nodes involvement. Clinical outcomes and toxicities were evaluated. Results Median follow-up was 50.8 (range, 1.3–68.0) months, four-year local relapse-free, regional relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, disease-free and overall survival rates were 94.7%, 97.0%, 91.7%, 87.2% and 91.9%, respectively. Acute severe (≥ grade 3) mucositis, dermatitis and xerostomia were observed in 27.6%, 3.6% and zero patients, respectively. At 1 year, xerostomia was mild, with frequencies of Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 xerostomia of 27.9%, 63.3%, 8.3% and 0.5%, respectively. Conclusions IMRT using individualized CTVs provided high rates of local and regional control and a favorable toxicity profile in NPC. Individualized CTV delineation strategy is a promising one that may effectively avoid unnecessary or missed irradiation, and deserve optimization to define more precise individualized CTVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji-Jin Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Guan-Qun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu-Lu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Ai-Hua Lin
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|