A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study (ISIDE-BT-1) of Accelerated IMRT With Temozolomide in Patients With Glioblastoma

Prospective Phase II Study of Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Grade 4 Glioma Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET Scan

AIMS

Local failure remains the major concern in grade 4 glioma or glioblastoma (GBM). Pilot studies have shown a radiotherapy (RT) dose-response relationship in GBM. Here we present our preliminary data of RT dose escalation using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. High 68Ga-pentixafor uptake in glioma cells helps in sharp demarcation between tumour and normal brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase II prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. Thirty, biopsy-proven cases of grade 4 glioma were included. All patients underwent post-operative MRI of the brain and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. RT was planned in 2-phases. Phase-1 GTV (GTV1) comprised of T2/flair abnormality, PET-avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 2cm was given to GTV-1 to create phase-1 CTV (CTV1), which was further expanded to 0.5cm to generate phase-1 PTV (PTV1). A radiation dose of 46Gy/23fr was prescribed to PTV-1. Phase-2 GTV (GTV2) consisted of CT/MRI contrast-enhancing lesion, PET avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 0.5 cm was given to GTV2 to create phase-2 CTV (CTV2) which was expanded to 0.5 cm to create phase-2 PTV (PTV2). RT dose of 14 Gy/7 fr was prescribed to PTV2. PET avid disease was delineated as GTV PET and a margin of 3mm was given to generate PTV-PET which received escalated RT dose of 21 Gy/7fr by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in phase 2 (Total dose to PTV PET = 67 Gy/30 fr). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The data was prospectively maintained in Microsoft Excel sheet. SPSS v 23 was used for statistical analysis. The primary endpoints were estimation of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoint was to measure the incidence of radiation necrosis. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage and quantitative variables were reported as median and range.

RESULTS

Data from thirty patients were analysed. A median OS of 23 months was observed with estimated 1, 2 and 3 years OS of 90%, 40% and 17.8% respectively. A significant association of OS was seen with the extent of surgery (p = 0.04) and kernofsky performance status (p = 0.007). No patient developed significant radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The index study did not show any survival benefit from dose escalation RT. However, all of the patients tolerated the treatment well and none of them developed radiation necrosis. Considering the small sample size as a limitation of the index study, the role of 68Ga-pentixafor PET scan for radiation dose escalation should be further explored.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

CTRI/2019/05/019146.

Recurrence pattern of glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate recurrence patterns of and survival outcomes in glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 91 patients with glioblastoma treated with either IMRT (n = 60) or 3D-CRT (n = 31) between January 2013 and December 2019. Magnetic resonance imaging showing tumor recurrence and planning computed tomography scans were fused for analyzing recurrence patterns categorized as in-field, marginal, and out-of-field based on their relation to the initial radiation field.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 18.9 months, with no significant difference between the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months, with no significant difference between the groups. Patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) had higher OS and PFS than those who underwent less extensive surgery. Among 78 relapse cases, 67 were of in-field; 5, marginal; and 19, out-of-field recurrence. Among 3D-CRT-treated cases, 24 were of in-field; 1, marginal; and 9, out-of-field recurrence. Among IMRT-treated cases, 43 were of in-field; 4, marginal; and 10, out-of-field recurrence. In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

IMRT and 3D-CRT effectively managed glioblastoma with no significant differences in OS and PFS. The survival benefit with GTR underscored the importance of maximal surgical resection. The reduced rate of out-of-field recurrence in IMRT-treated patients with partial resection highlights its potential utility in cases with unfeasible complete tumor removal.

Post-Operative Accelerated-Hypofractionated Chemoradiation With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Glioblastoma: A Phase I Study (ISIDE-BT-2)

Background

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer and one of the most lethal tumors. Theoretically, modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques allow dose-escalation due to the reduced irradiation of healthy tissues. This study aimed to define the adjuvant maximum tolerated dose (MTD) using volumetric modulated arc RT with simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT-SIB) plus standard dose temozolomide (TMZ) in GBM.

Methods

A Phase I clinical trial was performed in operated GBM patients using VMAT-SIB technique with progressively increased total dose. RT was delivered in 25 fractions (5 weeks) to two planning target volumes (PTVs) defined by adding a 5-mm margin to the clinical target volumes (CTVs). The CTV₁ was the tumor bed plus the MRI enhancing residual lesion with 10-mm margin. The CTV₂ was the CTV₁ plus 20-mm margin. Only PTV₁ dose was escalated (planned dose levels: 72.5, 75, 77.5, 80, 82.5, 85 Gy), while PTV₂ dose remained unchanged (45 Gy/1.8 Gy). Concurrent and sequential TMZ was prescribed according to the EORTC/NCIC protocol. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as any G ≥ 3 non-hematological acute toxicity or any G ≥ 4 acute hematological toxicities (RTOG scale) or any G ≥ 2 late toxicities (RTOG-EORTC scale).

Results

Thirty-seven patients (M/F: 21/16; median age: 59 years; median follow-up: 12 months) were enrolled and treated as follows: 6 patients (72.5 Gy), 10 patients (75 Gy), 10 patients (77.5 Gy), 9 patients (80 Gy), 2 patients (82.5 Gy), and 0 patients (85 Gy). Eleven patients (29.7%) had G1-2 acute neurological toxicity, while 3 patients (8.1%) showed G ≥ 3 acute neurological toxicities at 77.5 Gy, 80 Gy, and 82.5 Gy levels, respectively. Since two DLTs (G3 neurological: 1 patient and G5 hematological toxicity: 1 patient) were observed at 82.5 Gy level, the trial was closed and the 80 Gy dose-level was defined as the MTD. Two asymptomatic histologically proven radionecrosis were recorded.

Conclusions

According to the results of this Phase I trial, 80 Gy in 25 fractions accelerated hypofractionated RT is the MTD using VMAT-SIB plus standard dose TMZ in resected GBM.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Hypofractionated Chemoradiation Versus Conventionally Fractionated Chemoradiation for Glioblastoma in the Elderly Population

PURPOSE

This study evaluated practice patterns, outcomes, and predictors of survival for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with either hypofractionated radiotherapy or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients age 65 years and above diagnosed with GBM between 2006 and 2012 that received definitive CRT with either hypofractionated radiotherapy (hCRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (cCRT). Patient, tumor, and treatment parameters were extracted. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) as well as Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. Propensity score matching was performed in order to assess groups in a balanced manner while reducing indication biases.

RESULTS

Altogether, 5126 patients met inclusion criteria; 126 (2.5%) underwent hCRT, while 5000 (97.5%) received cCRT. Temporal trends revealed that the use of hCRT is rising, especially in more recent years. Patients undergoing hCRT were older, with worse performance status, treated with biopsy only, and more likely to receive treatment at an academic facility. cCRT was associated with improved median OS (10.7 vs. 6.2 mo, P<0.001). This persisted in both Cox multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.72; P=<0.001) and on propensity-matched analysis (median OS 8.7 vs. 6.2 mo; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence intervcal, 0.53-0.89; P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to directly evaluate hCRT versus cCRT for patients with GBM. The use of hCRT is rising over time; practice patterns of hCRT administration are evaluated. Delivery of hCRT independently predicted for poorer OS. Prospective data is recommended to validate the findings herein.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Standard therapy depends on patient age and performance status but principally involves surgical resection followed by a 6-wk course of radiation therapy given concurrently with temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite such treatment, prognosis remains poor, with a median survival of 16 mo. Challenges in achieving local control, maintaining quality of life, and limiting toxicity plague treatment strategies for this disease. Radiotherapy dose intensification through hypofractionation and stereotactic radiosurgery is a promising strategy that has been explored to meet these challenges. We review the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.

New Hypofractionation Radiation Strategies for Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of less than 2 years despite the standard of care treatment of 6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. We review the data investigating hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigators have explored alternative radiotherapy strategies that shorten treatment duration with the goal of similar or improved survival while minimizing toxicity. HFRT over 1-3 weeks is already a standard of care for patients with advanced age or poor performance status. For young patients with good performance status, HFRT holds the promise of radiobiologically escalating the dose and potentially improving local control while maintaining quality of life. Through the use of shorter radiotherapy fractionation regimens coupled with novel systemic agents, improved outcomes for patients with GBM may be achieved.

[Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: changing the radiation treatment paradigm]

Hypofractionation has the dual advantage of increased cell death with a higher dose per fraction and a reduced effect of accelerated tumor cell repopulation due to a shorter overall treatment time. However, the potential advantage may be offset by increased toxicity in the late-responding neural tissues. Recently, investigators have attempted delivering radical doses of HFRT by escalating the dose in the immediate vicinity of the enhancing tumor and postoperative surgical cavity and reported reasonable outcomes with acceptable toxicity levels. Three different studies of high-dose HFRT have reported on the paradoxical phenomenon of improved survival in patients developing radiation necrosis at the primary tumor site. The toxicity criteria of RTOG and EORTC have defined clinically or radiographically suspected radionecrosis as Grade 4 toxicity. However, most patients diagnosed with radiation necrosis in the above studies remained asymptomatic. Furthermore, the probable association with improved survival would strongly argue against adopting a blind approach for classifying radiation necrosis as Grade 4 toxicity. The data emerging from the above studies is encouraging and strongly argues for further research. However, the majority of these studies are predominantly retrospective or relatively small single-arm prospective series that add little to the overall quality of evidence. Notwithstanding the above limitations, HFRT appears to be a safe and feasible strategy for glioblastoma patients.

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost technique with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma

Aims and background

We assessed the therapeutic efficacy of combined hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with temozolomide in patients with primary glioblastoma.

Methods and study design

Thirty-nine patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma were accrued. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, a dose of 50 Gy in 5-Gy fractions was applied to the gross tumor volume, together with 40 Gy in 4-Gy fractions and 30 Gy in 3-Gy fractions to the 1- and 2-cm margins from the gross tumor volume, respectively. Patients were also treated with concurrent temozolomide during intensity-modulated radiotherapy, followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide.

Results

Median follow-up was 16.8 months (range, 4.3–54.3). Tumor progression was observed in 28 patients (71.8%), and the median time to progression was 6.8 months. Median survival was 16.8 months, and it was affected significantly by the extent of surgery. During adjuvant temozolomide treatment, 3 patients (9.7%) developed grade 3–4 hematologic or hepatic toxicity. Radiation necrosis developed in 7 patients (17.9%) and massive necrosis, requiring emergency surgery, in 1 patient (2.6%).

Conclusions

The regimen of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with temozolomide showed a relatively good outcome in patients with glioblastoma. Further studies are required to define the optimal fraction size for glioblastoma using this highly sophisticated radiation technique.

Clinical and dosimetric study of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to compare three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of glioblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 220 patients with glioblastoma, treated with 3D-CRT or IMRT, with or without surgery. Dosimetric parameters as well as clinical and survival data for the two techniques were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The median conformity index was 1.53 (range 0-2.69) for 3D-CRT and 1.25 (range 0.97-2.01) for IMRT, p < 10^-4. The median homogeneity index was 0.10 (range 0.03-0.32) for 3D-CRT and 0.07 (range 0.03-0.18) for IMRT, p < 10^-4. There were significantly fewer acute grade 1 and 2 neurological toxicities in the IMRT group especially for edema (1.3 versus 12.4%, p = 0.017), concentration disorders (6.6 versus 19.9%, p = 0.003) and consciousness disorders (2.6 versus 13.2%, p = 0.002) although IMRT patients had a significantly worse pre-treatment neurological status than 3D-CRT patients. Median survival was 16.0 months (range 11.9-17.8) for IMRT and 13.4 months (range 11.7-15.7) for 3D-CRT patients (p = 0.542).

CONCLUSION

IMRT improved target conformity and reduced neurological toxicities for patients with glioblastomas.

A Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Temozolomide Followed by Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Patients With Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

We performed a phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant temozolomide (TMZ), followed by hypofractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) with concurrent TMZ, and adjuvant TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to determine whether neoadjuvant TMZ would safely improve outcomes in this group of patients prior to subsequent cytotoxic therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky Performance Status >60 were eligible. Neoadjuvant TMZ administration started 2 to 3 weeks from surgery at a daily dose of 75 mg/m² for 2 weeks prior to delivery of HART (60 Gy in 20 daily fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. The primary endpoints were feasibility and toxicity. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were accrued. The median follow-up period was 44.0 months for patients at risk and 22.3 months for all 50 patients. Except for 1 patient in whom infection developed and another patient with progression during HART, all patients completed protocol therapy as planned. The median OS and progression-free survival were 22.3 months (95% confidence interval, 14.6-42.7 months) and 13.7 months (95% confidence interval, 8.0-33.3 months), respectively. The 4-year OS rates were 30.4% for the entire cohort and 53.3% and 14.0% for patients with methylated (n=21) and unmethylated (n=27) MGMT gene promoter tumors, respectively. One patient had grade 5 pancytopenia during HART, and another patient had transient grade 4 hepatotoxicity. A second surgical procedure was performed in 13 patients: 2 had intracranial infection, 3 had recurrences, 4 had recurrences and radiation-induced damage, and 4 had only radiation-induced damage.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel approach of neoadjuvant TMZ is associated with an encouraging favorable long-term survival with acceptable toxicity. A future comparative trial of the efficacy of this regimen is warranted.

A phase I dose escalation study using simultaneous integrated-boost IMRT with temozolomide in patients with unifocal glioblastoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) associated with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2009 and January 2012, nine patients with malignant glioma were enrolled in this phase I clinical trial. Radiotherapy was delivered using fractions of 2.5Gy on the planning target volume b and of 1.9Gy on the planning target volume a. Volumes were defined as follow: gross tumour volume b: tumour taking up contrast on T1 weighted MRI images; clinical target volume b: gross tumour volume b+0.5cm (adapted to the anatomical structures) and lastly planning target volume b: clinical target volume b+0.5cm; gross tumour volume a: tumour (gross tumour volume b)+2cm and including oedema outlined on T2Flair MRI sequences; clinical target volume a gross tumour volume a+0.5cm (adapted to the anatomical structures); planning target volume a: clinical target volume a+0.5cm. Three patients were enrolled at each of the three levels of dose (70, 75 and 80Gy prescribed on the planning target volume b and 56, 60 and 60.8Gy on the planning target volume a). Radiotherapy was delivered with temozolomide according to the standard protocol. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any haematological toxicities at least grade 4 or as any radiotherapy-related non-haematological acute toxicities at least grade 3, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.

RESULTS

Until the last dose level of 80Gy, no patient showed dose-limiting toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

SIB-IMRT, at least until a dose of 80Gy in 32 daily fractions, associated with temozolomide is feasible and well tolerated.

Glioblastoma: Radiation treatment margins, how small is large enough?

Standard treatment for glioblastoma consists of surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. Conventional radiation clinical treatment volumes include a 2- to 3-cm margin around magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography enhancing abnormalities in the brain as well as a margin around the T2 or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormality. However, there remains significant variability with respect to whether such extensive margins are necessary. Collectively, we as authors of this manuscript also use different margins, with A.G.W. employing European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations of a 2- to 3-cm margin on T1 enhancement for 60 Gy and M.P.M. using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recommendations of 2 cm on T2 signal abnormality for the initial 46 Gy and 2.5-cm margin on T1 enhancement for a 14-Gy boost. Our experiences reflect the heterogeneity of margin definition and selection for this disease and underscore an important area of further research to minimize this variability. In this article, we review studies exploring recurrence patterns and outcomes in patients treated using both conventional and more limited margins. We conclude that treating to "smaller" margins does not alter recurrence patterns nor does it result in inferior survival, but whether this is because of the inherently limited benefit of radiation therapy in the first place, or whether it is truly because microscopic tumor control at larger distances is not an issue, remains unestablished.

On the cutting edge of intensity modulated radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB): The case of a patient with 8 brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple brain metastases, especially those with more than 3 lesions, usually undergo to palliative whole brain (WB) radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A breast cancer patient with 8 brain metastases was treated on the brain by a radical RT regimen. Prescription doses were according to the simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) technique with all lesions as well brain irradiated simultaneously in 20 daily fractions. Doses of 40.0 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) and 50.0 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) were prescribed to the whole brain and to eight individual metastases, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean volume of the eight metastases was 8.1 cc (range: 3.8-10.1 cc). For all lesions, the volume receiving 95% of prescribed dose was 100% and dose homogeneity was within 3%. Moreover, maximum doses were less than 105% of prescribed dose, while average mean dose to lesions was 50.6 Gy (range: 49.7-51.5 Gy). Whole brain mean dose was 45.2 Gy. Maximum doses to brainstem and optic chiasma were limited to 44.5 Gy and 42.9 Gy, respectively, while maximum doses to eyes, lens and optic nerves were limited to 9.2 Gy, 4.9 Gy and 41.0 Gy, respectively. From a clinical point of view, subsequent MRI brain controls showed a complete clinical response. Forty months after treatment the patient is disease free and shows no late brain and skin toxicities.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates the technical feasibility of a SIB-IMRT treatment in patients with more than 3 brain metastases.

Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allowed the simultaneous delivery of different doses to different target volumes within a single fraction, an approach called simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). As consequence, the fraction dose to the boost volume can be increased while keeping low doses to the elective volumes, and the number of fractions and overall treatment time will be reduced, translating into better radiobiological effectiveness. In recent years, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been shown to provide similar plan quality with respect to fixed-field IMRT but with large reduction in treatment time and monitor units (MUs) number. However, the feasibility of VMAT when used with SIB strategy has few investigations to date. We explored the potential of VMAT in a SIB strategy for complex cancer sites. A total of 15 patients were selected, including 5 head-and-neck, 5 high-risk prostate, and 5 rectal cancer cases. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each case using Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system for an Elekta Precise linac. Dosimetric indexes for targets and organs at risk (OARs) were compared based on dose-volume histograms. Conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose-contrast index were used for target analyses. The equivalent uniform doses and the normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for main OARs. MUs number and treatment time were analyzed to score treatment efficiency. Pretreatment dosimetry was performed using 2-dimensional (2D)-array dosimeter. SIB-VMAT plans showed a high level of fluence modulation needed for SIB treatments, high conformal dose distribution, similar target coverage, and a tendency to improve OARs sparing compared with the benchmark SIB-IMRT plans. The median treatment times reduced from 13 to 20 minutes to approximately 5 minutes for all cases with SIB-VMAT, with a MUs reduction up to 22.5%. The 2D-array ion-chambers' measurements reported an agreement of more than 95% for a criterion of 3% to 3mm. SIB-VMAT was able to combine the advantages of conventional SIB-IMRT with its highly conformal dose distribution and OARs sparing and the advantages of 3D-conformal radiotherapy with its fast delivery.

Hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

We conducted a phase I study to determine (a) the maximum tolerated dose of peri-radiation therapy temozolomide (TMZ) and (b) the safety of a selected hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (HIMRT) regimen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Patients with histological diagnosis of GBM, Karnofsky performance status (KPS)≥ 60 and adequate bone marrow function were eligible for the study. All patients received peri-radiation TMZ; 1 week before the beginning of radiation therapy (RT), 1 week after RT and for 3 weeks during RT. Standard 75 mg/m(2)/day dose was administered to all patients 1 week post-RT. Dose escalation was commenced at level I: 50mg/m(2)/day, level II: 65 mg/m(2)/day and level III: 75 mg/m(2)/day for 4 weeks. HIMRT was delivered at 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions to the contrast enhancing lesion (or surgical cavity) plus the surrounding edema plus a 2 cm margin. Six men and three women with a median age of 67 years (range, 44-81) and a median KPS of 80 (range, 80-90) were enrolled. Three patients were accrued at each TMZ dose level. Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-15). Median progression free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-7.4; range, 0.9-9.9 months) and the overall survival 12.7 months (95% CI: 2.5-17.6; range, 2.5-20.7 months). Time spent in a KPS ≥ 70 was 8.1 months (95% CI: 2.4-15.6; range, 2.4-16 months). No instance of irreversible grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was noted. HIMRT at 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions with peri-RT TMZ at a maximum tolerated dose of 75 mg/m(2)/day for 5 weeks is well tolerated and is able to abate treatment time for these patients.

Integration method of 3D MR spectroscopy into treatment planning system for glioblastoma IMRT dose painting with integrated simultaneous boost

Background

To integrate 3D MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) in the treatment planning system (TPS) for glioblastoma dose painting to guide simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Methods

For sixteen glioblastoma patients, we have simulated three types of dosimetry plans, one conventional plan of 60-Gy in 3D conformational radiotherapy (3D-CRT), one 60-Gy plan in IMRT and one 72-Gy plan in SIB-IMRT. All sixteen MRSI metabolic maps were integrated into TPS, using normalization with color-space conversion and threshold-based segmentation. The fusion between the metabolic maps and the planning CT scans were assessed. Dosimetry comparisons were performed between the different plans of 60-Gy 3D-CRT, 60-Gy IMRT and 72-Gy SIB-IMRT, the last plan was targeted on MRSI abnormalities and contrast enhancement (CE).

Results

Fusion assessment was performed for 160 transformations. It resulted in maximum differences <1.00 mm for translation parameters and ≤1.15° for rotation. Dosimetry plans of 72-Gy SIB-IMRT and 60-Gy IMRT showed a significantly decreased maximum dose to the brainstem (44.00 and 44.30 vs. 57.01 Gy) and decreased high dose-volumes to normal brain (19 and 20 vs. 23% and 7 and 7 vs. 12%) compared to 60-Gy 3D-CRT (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Delivering standard doses to conventional target and higher doses to new target volumes characterized by MRSI and CE is now possible and does not increase dose to organs at risk. MRSI and CE abnormalities are now integrated for glioblastoma SIB-IMRT, concomitant with temozolomide, in an ongoing multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial. Our method of MR spectroscopy maps integration to TPS is robust and reliable; integration to neuronavigation systems with this method could also improve glioblastoma resection or guide biopsies.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: strategy for poor-risk patients or hope for the future?

The prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor, and the use of hyperfractionation or dose escalation beyond 60 Gy has not conferred any survival benefit. More recently, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) has been employed as a novel approach for achieving dose escalation, with interesting results. We present here a systematic overview of the role and development of HFRT as a possible therapeutic strategy in patients with GBM. We searched the PubMed database for studies published since 1990 that reported on the tolerance, safety and survival outcomes after HFRT. These studies reported on the paradox of improved survival in patients developing central radionecrosis within the high-dose volume. Most series reported no significant increase in early or late toxicity, except for one study that reported visual loss in one patient at 7 months after treatment. More recently, studies of HFRT combined with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) reported a trend towards improved survival compared with historical controls, with a few studies reporting a median survival of approximately 20 months. The interpretation of data from the above studies is limited by the heterogeneities of patient population and the significant variation in the range of employed dose schedules. However, high-dose HFRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy appears to be a safe and feasible therapeutic option. There is a suggestion of improved outcomes on combining HFRT with TMZ, which warrants further investigation in a randomised trial.

Accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a phase I dose-escalation study (ISIDE-BT-1)

BACKGROUND

We performed a dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with standard concurrent and sequential-dose temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

METHODS

Histologically proven glioblastoma patients underwent IMRT dose escalation. IMRT was delivered over 5 weeks with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to the two planning target volumes (PTVs) defined by adding 5-mm margin to the respective clinical target volumes (CTVs). CTV1 was the tumor bed plus the enhancing lesion with 10-mm margin; CTV2 was the area of perifocal edema with 20-mm margin. Only the PTV1 dose was escalated (planned dose escalation: 60, 62.5, 65, 67.5, 70 Gy) while the PTV2 dose remained the same (45 Gy).

RESULTS

Forty consecutive glioblastoma patients were treated. While no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was recorded during the dose escalation up to 67.5/2.7 Gy, two out of the first six consecutively enrolled patients on the highest dose level (70/2.8 Gy) experienced a DLT, and therefore a cohort expansion was required. 3/14 patients experienced a DLT on the highest planned dose level, and therefore the MTD was not exceeded. After a median follow-up time of 25 months no grade >2 late neurological toxicity was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a SIB IMRT technique, a radiation dose of 70 Gy in 25 fractions (biological effective dose--BED--of 92.8 Gy) can be delivered with concurrent and sequential standard dose TMZ, without unacceptable acute toxicity in patients with glioblastoma.

Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the recommended phase II dose of postoperative accelerated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Step and shoot IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) was delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to patients with high risk resected prostate adenocarcinoma (stage pT3-4 and/or positive surgical margins). Pelvic nodes received 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction; dose escalation was performed only to the prostate bed (planned dose escalation: 56.8 Gy at 2.27 Gy/fraction, 59.7 Gy at 2.39 Gy/fraction, 61.25 Gy at 2.45 Gy/fraction, 62.5 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was any grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity (RTOG score).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated: 7 patients at the 56.75 Gy dose level, 6 patients at each subsequent dose level. Pathologic stages were: pT2c: 2; pT3a: 11; pT3b: 12; pN0: 22; pN1: 3; R0: 7; R1: 18. Median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 6-36 months). No patient experienced DLT. Grade 1-2 acute rectal and urologic toxicity was common (17 and 22 patients, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose was 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction. Postoperative hypofractionated IMRT SIB for prostate cancer seemed to be well tolerated and could be tested in phase II studies.

A phase I dose escalation study of hypofractionated IMRT field-in-field boost for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

OBJECTIVES

To describe the results of a Phase I dose escalation trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) using a hypofractionated concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) boost.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled between April 1999 and August 2003. Radiotherapy consisted of daily fractions of 1.8 Gy with a concurrent boost of 0.7 Gy (total 2.5 Gy daily) to a total dose of 70, 75, or 80 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy was not permitted. Seven patients were enrolled at each dose and dose limiting toxicities were defined as irreversible Grade 3 or any Grade 4-5 acute neurotoxicity attributable to radiotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients experienced Grade 1 or 2 acute toxicities. Acutely, 8 patients experienced Grade 3 and 1 patient experienced Grade 3 and 4 toxicities. Of these, only two reversible cases of otitis media were attributable to radiotherapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. Only 2 patients experienced Grade 3 delayed toxicity and there was no delayed Grade 4 toxicity. Eleven patients requiring repeat resection or biopsy were found to have viable tumor and radiation changes with no cases of radionecrosis alone. Median overall and progression-free survival for this cohort were 13.6 and 6.5 months, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 57% and 19%. At recurrence, 15 patients received chemotherapy, 9 underwent resection, and 5 received radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a hypofractionated concurrent IMRT boost, we were able to safely treat patients to 80 Gy without any dose-limiting toxicity. Given that local failure still remains the predominant pattern for GBM patients, a trial of dose escalation with IMRT and temozolomide is warranted.