Measuring Interfractional and Intrafractional Motion With Cone Beam Computed Tomography and an Optical Localization System for Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Treated With Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Optical Surface-guided Radiation Therapy for Upper and Lower Limb Sarcomas: An Analysis of Setup Errors and Clinical Target Volume-To-Planning Target Volume Margins

Purpose

To assess the clinical benefits of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) in terms of setup error, positioning time, and clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods and Materials

Fifty consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy were selected retrospectively. Treatment setup was performed with either laser-based imaging only (control group), or with laser-based and daily optical surface-based imaging (SGRT group). Pretreatment cone beam computed tomography images were acquired daily for the first 3 to 5 fractions and weekly thereafter, with the frequency adjusted as necessary. Translational and rotational errors were collected. CTV-PTV margin was calculated using the formula, 2.5Σ + 0.7σ.

Results

Each group consisted of 10 and 15 upper and lower limb STSs, respectively. For patients with upper limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.64 ± 1.34 mm, 1.10 ± 1.50 mm, and 1.24 ± 1.45 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.48 ± 3.16 mm, 2.84 ± 2.85 mm, and 3.14 ± 3.29 mm in control group in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively. Correspondingly, for patients with lower limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.21 ± 1.65 mm, 1.39 ± 1.71 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.10 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.81 ± 2.60 mm, 2.93 ± 3.28 mm, and 3.53 ± 3.75 mm in control group, respectively. The calculated CTV-PTV margins of the SGRT group and control group were 5.0, 3.8, 4.1 versus 5.9, 9.1, 10.1 mm for upper limb sarcomas; and 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 mm versus 6.3, 9.6, and 11.4 mm for lower limb sarcomas in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusions

Daily optical surface guidance can effectively improve the setup accuracy of extremity STS patients, and safely reduce the required CTV-PTV margins.

Utility of a skin marker-less setup procedure using surface-guided imaging: a comparison with the traditional laser-based setup in extremity irradiation

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a skin marker-less patient setup using a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for extremity radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients who underwent radiotherapy to the extremities were included in this retrospective study. The first group consisted of 10 patients and underwent a traditional setup procedure using skin marks and lasers. The second group comprised 15 patients and had a skin marker-less setup procedure that used an SGRT system only. To compare the two setup procedures for setup accuracy, the mean 3D vector shift magnitude was 0.9 mm for the traditional setup procedure and 0.5 mm for the skin marker-less setup procedure (p < 0.01). In addition, SGRT systems have been suggested to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setups and consistently reduce interfractional setup errors. These results indicate that a skin marker-less patient setup procedure using an SGRT system is useful for extremity irradiation.

Advances and potential of optical surface imaging in radiotherapy

This article reviews the recent advancements and future potential of optical surface imaging (OSI) in clinical applications as a four-dimensional (4D) imaging modality for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), including OSI systems, clinical SGRT applications, and OSI-based clinical research. The OSI is a non-ionizing radiation imaging modality, offering real-time 3D surface imaging with a large field of view (FOV), suitable for in-room interactive patient setup, and real-time motion monitoring at any couch rotation during radiotherapy. So far, most clinical SGRT applications have focused on treating superficial breast cancer or deep-seated brain cancer in rigid anatomy, because the skin surface can serve as tumor surrogates in these two clinical scenarios, and the procedures for breast treatments in free-breathing (FB) or at deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) are well developed. When using the skin surface as a body-position surrogate, SGRT promises to replace the traditional tattoo/laser-based setup. However, this requires new SGRT procedures for all anatomical sites and new workflows from treatment simulation to delivery. SGRT studies in other anatomical sites have shown slightly higher accuracy and better performance than a tattoo/laser-based setup. In addition, radiographical image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is still necessary, especially for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). To go beyond the external body surface and infer an internal tumor motion, recent studies have shown the clinical potential of OSI-based spirometry to measure dynamic tidal volume as a tumor motion surrogate, and Cherenkov surface imaging to guide and assess treatment delivery. As OSI provides complete datasets of body position, deformation, and motion, it offers an opportunity to replace fiducial-based optical tracking systems. After all, SGRT has great potential for further clinical applications. In this review, OSI technology, applications, and potential are discussed since its first introduction to radiotherapy in 2005, including technical characterization, different commercial systems, and major clinical applications, including conventional SGRT on top of tattoo/laser-based alignment and new SGRT techniques attempting to replace tattoo/laser-based setup. The clinical research for OSI-based tumor tracking is reviewed, including OSI-based spirometry and OSI-guided tumor tracking models. Ongoing clinical research has created more SGRT opportunities for clinical applications beyond the current scope.

Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.

The role of radiotherapy in adult soft tissues sarcoma of the extremities

Local management of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities has evolved over the past decades. Until the 1970s, radical surgery (amputations) was the standard therapeutic procedure resulting in significant physical and psychological morbidity for the patients. In the present era, limb sparing surgery combined with radiotherapy represents the current standard of care for high grade and > 5 cm STSs. This approach guarantees high local control rate and function preservation. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence for RT in STSs of the extremities. Outcomes, technical details (techniques, timing, dose, volumes of treatment) and the emerging role of RT in the management of oligometastatic disease will be analysed. Finally, results of the recent clinical trials testing new scenarios in RT of STSs will be described.

Radiation Therapy in Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma-Current Knowledge and Future Directions: A Review and Expert Opinion

Simple Summary

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment and is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. Modern radiation techniques, like intensity-modulated, image-guided, or stereotactic body RT, as well as special applications like intraoperative RT, brachytherapy, or particle therapy, have widened the therapeutic window allowing either dose escalation with improved efficacy or reduction of side effects with improved functional outcome. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment, namely its use as an adjunct to surgery in resectable STS (perioperative RT), as a primary treatment in non-resectable tumors (definitive RT), as a local treatment modality in oligometastatic disease or as palliative therapy. Due to the known differences in clinical course, general treatment options and, consequently, outcome depending on lesion localization, the main part of perioperative RT is divided into three sections according to body site (extremity/trunk wall, retroperitoneal, and head and neck STS) including the discussion of special applications of radiation techniques specifically amenable to this region. The review of the current evidence is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

A study on prostate movement and dosimetric variation because of bladder and rectum volumes changes during the course of image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer

Aim

To study the impact of bladder and rectum volume changes on prostate positioning and the dosimetric parameters.

Background

Prostate is a moving organ, and its position is also affected by bladder and rectum volumes. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is being practiced widely for the treatment of prostate carcinoma (Ca). So, it is important to accurately study the effect of bladder and rectum volume changes in treatment.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with Ca prostate were included in this study, and all were treated with 50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions for the first phase of treatment. A total of 750 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sessions were performed. Prostate position w.r.t. its day one position was noted, and the bladder and rectum volumes were compared with their volumes on day one. Also, repeat CT was done for five patients after 10 fractions. The initial plan was imported as it was on the repeat CT images, and a hybrid plan was prepared by putting the plan isocenter at the relative anatomical reference point in repeat CT images as it was in primary CT images. The multileaf collimators (MLC) fluence was put as it is, and the dose was calculated using the monitoring units (MU), which were in the initial plan. Doses to bladder, rectum, and the target were analyzed.

Results

The mean prostate motion in lateral and anterior-posterior direction was found to be 0.71 (±0.69) centimeter cm) and 0.77 (±0.57) cm, respectively. The mean change in bladder and rectum volumes as compared to that in day one CT images was found to be 110.51 (±84.25) cubic centimeters (cc) and 10.89 (±10.17) cc, respectively. No significant variation was observed in the doses to bladder, rectum, and the target volume in a hybrid plan, as compared to that in actual initial plan.

Conclusions

Bladder and rectum volume affects the position of prostate, rather the dosimetric parameters, and therefore, it can be concluded that daily CBCT should be done for accurate IGRT delivery to the prostate cancer.

Impact of Immobilization on Interfractional Errors for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Radiation Therapy

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Owing to the rare nature and presentation of upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) and the high mobility of associated anatomy, various patient positioning strategies are used for radiation therapy. The purpose of this study is to measure the interfractional setup errors associated with upper extremity sarcomas using different immobilization methods through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

METHODS

All patients treated with daily CBCT guidance for upper extremity STSs during 2014-2015 were identified and triaged based on type of immobilization. After defining an optimal region of interest for image registration, daily CBCT images were automatically registered to reference CT images to quantify positional discrepancies. Means and standard deviations were calculated, and one-way analysis of variance was calculated to determine significance of data.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with upper extremity sarcoma met inclusion criteria: 13 were treated to the shoulder/axilla/upper arm and 4 to the arm/elbow/forearm. Three main types of immobilization were identified: vacuum cradle with custom thermoplastic shell, vacuum cradle alone, and no immobilization accessory used. Patient repositioning occurred if translational and rotational displacements were larger than 1 mm and 5°, respectively, as per institutional guidelines. Patient repositioning rates were 18% for vacuum cradle with thermoplastic shells, 15% for vacuum cradles only, and 6% for no immobilization accessories. Mean translational displacements in right/left (R/L), superior/inferior (S/I), and anterior/posterior (A/P) directions were -0.04 ± 0.33 cm, 0.32 ± 0.33 cm, and 0.12 ± 0.25 cm for vacuum cradle with thermoplastic shell; 0.25 ± 0.10 cm, -0.07 ± 0.22 cm, and 0.00 ± 0.17 cm for vacuum cradle alone; and 0.14 ± 0.15 cm, 0.08 ± 0.45 cm, and -0.01 ± 0.24 cm for no immobilization. For all patients, rotational displacements in the pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.15 ± 1.99°, 0.31 ± 2.11°, and -0.21 ± 1.76°, respectively. There were significant (P < .05) differences in systematic error values for all translational and rotational axes between immobilization methods.

CONCLUSION

Large interfractional errors, especially in the rotational axes, were observed, regardless of immobilization strategy. Small study population and unequal representation of different parts of the upper extremity are identified limitations. The need for better immobilization techniques for upper extremity STS treatments is clearly demonstrated.

Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy after Gross Total Resection in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION

We report a pooled analysis evaluating the combination of gross complete limb-sparing surgery, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS

Individual data of 259 patients (median follow-up 63 months) with extremity STS from three European expert centers were pooled. Median age was 55 years and median tumor size was 8 cm. Eighty percent of patients presented with primary disease, mainly located in the lower limb (81%). Union for International Cancer Control 7th edition stage at presentation was as follows: stage I: 9%; stage II: 47%; stage III: 39%; stage IV: 5%. Most patients showed high-grade lesions (91%), predominantly liposarcoma (31%). Median IOERT dose was 12 Gy, preceeded (17%) or followed (83%) by EBRT, with a median dose of 45 Gy.

RESULTS

Surgery resulted in R0 resections in 71% of patients and R1 resections in 29% of patients. The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 86%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were disease status and resection margin. Only margin remained significant in multivariate analysis. The 5-year distant control rate was 69%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were histology, grading, resection margin, and metastases prior to/at IOERT. Only grading and metastases remained significant in multivariate analysis. Actuarial 5-year rates of freedom from treatment failure and OS were 61% and 78%, respectively. Significant factors for OS were grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT (univariate, multivariate). Limb preservation and good functional outcome were achieved in 95% and 81% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis confirmed prior reports of encouraging LC and survival, with excellent rates of preserved limb function with this treatment approach. Resection margin remained the most important factor for LC, while grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT mainly predicted survival.

A service evaluation of on-line image-guided radiotherapy to lower extremity sarcoma: Investigating the workload implications of a 3 mm action level for image assessment and correction prior to delivery

INTRODUCTION

Although all systematic and random positional setup errors can be corrected for in entirety during on-line image-guided radiotherapy, the use of a specified action level, below which no correction occurs, is also an option. The following service evaluation aimed to investigate the use of this 3 mm action level for on-line image assessment and correction (online, systematic set-up error and weekly evaluation) for lower extremity sarcoma, and understand the impact on imaging frequency and patient positioning error within one cancer centre.

METHODS

All patients were immobilised using a thermoplastic shell attached to a plastic base and an individual moulded footrest. A retrospective analysis of 30 patients was performed. Patient setup and correctional data derived from cone beam CT analysis was retrieved. The timing, frequency and magnitude of corrections were evaluated. The population systematic and random error was derived.

RESULTS

20% of patients had no systematic corrections over the duration of treatment, and 47% had one. The maximum number of systematic corrections per course of radiotherapy was 4, which occurred for 2 patients. 34% of episodes occurred within the first 5 fractions. All patients had at least one observed translational error during their treatment greater than 0.3 cm, and 80% of patients had at least one observed translational error during their treatment greater than 0.5 cm. The population systematic error was 0.14 cm, 0.10 cm, 0.14 cm and random error was 0.27 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.23 cm in the lateral, caudocranial and anteroposterial directions. The required Planning Target Volume margin for the study population was 0.55 cm, 0.41 cm and 0.50 cm in the lateral, caudocranial and anteroposterial directions.

CONCLUSION

The 3 mm action level for image assessment and correction prior to delivery reduced the imaging burden and focussed intervention on patients that exhibited greater positional variability. This strategy could be an efficient deployment of departmental resources if full daily correction of positional setup error is not possible.

Evidence-based region of interest matching guidelines for sarcoma volumetric image-guided radiation therapy

•

Region-of-interest (ROI) guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma CBCT-guidance were developed.

•

ROI guidelines were developed for four anatomic sites using the PDSA cycle.

•

ROI guidelines are intended to increase image registration reproducibility.

•

Results include improved image guidance decision making and workflow efficiencies.

Purpose

Region-of-interest (ROI) guidelines for online cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiotherapy may improve matching reproducibility and reduce inter-user variability of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) image guidance. The purpose of this work is to standardize ROI STS CBCT image registration guidelines using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle for the lower extremity, retroperitoneal, pelvis, and thorax.

Methods

Based on anatomic bony surrogates, initial ROI matching guidelines for STS were developed by a team of radiation therapists, physicists and oncologists (Plan). Retrospective, qualitative evaluation of the guidelines was completed by the designated sarcoma lead therapist to determine clinical feasibility (Do). Validation of the ROI guidelines was performed through independent evaluation by radiation therapy CBCT imaging experts on a cohort of 10 patients per anatomic region (Study).

Results

Draft ROI guidelines were evaluated by 2 independent observers who registered weekly CBCT images to test their validity. Each observer assessed 5 patients per anatomic site, testing ROI options for accuracy of image registration and feasibility, while some ROI borders were adjusted based on algorithm matching performance. Validated ROI guidelines were presented to the sarcoma multidisciplinary site group, and an inter-professional committee of imaging experts for approval prior to clinical implementation (Act).

Conclusion

ROI matching guidelines for STS IGRT were standardized for 4 anatomic sites using the PDSA cycle for change testing and implementation. IGRT guidelines are intended to improve STS image registration reproducibility, and in turn, are expected to improve the confidence of IGRT decision making and workflow efficiencies for a rare disease with diverse presentation.

[Radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: Technical evolution and impact on clinical benefit]

The standard treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas is based on the association of surgery and radiotherapy. This strategy allows local control improvement with the risk of increased toxicity. There is therefore a growing interest to identify those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy and those who will have the same local control with surgery alone. Furthermore, the development of toxicity has been correlated with the extension of the irradiated volume and the volume receiving high doses. Technological development as intensity modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy allows limited irradiated volume improving the protection of the organs at risk leading to clinical benefit improvement. Moreover, efforts are being done to improve local control for the patients at high risk of local relapse. In this paper, we discuss all these mentioned aspects.

Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy and impact of setup errors in lower limb sarcoma radiation therapy

PURPOSE

This study compared dosimetric data between 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans in a population of patients with lower limb sarcoma immobilized with an in-house device and quantified the impact of systematic and random errors on these techniques. The dosimetric effects of displacements on target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) were considered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans were created for 11 postoperative patients using both 3DCRT and IMRT. The techniques were compared dosimetrically. Population-based systematic and random errors were applied and the results compared with the initial plans.

RESULTS

Higher target D95, D2, D98, and D50 and the best homogeneity index resulted with IMRT compared with 3DCRT. Systematic errors increased target D2 in IMRT. Random errors decreased target homogeneity in IMRT. Maximum bone dose was higher in IMRT than in 3DCRT. Neither error type increased OAR dose for either technique.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT could become the favored lower limb sarcoma radiation therapy technique because of superior target coverage and homogeneity. Offline imaging can adequately correct for systematic errors in these patients when an in-house immobilization device is used.

Dosimetric feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided tri-cobalt 60 preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric differences of delivering preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity (ESTS) with a teletherapy system equipped with 3 rotating (60)Co sources and a built-in magnetic resonance imaging and with standard linear accelerator (LINAC)-based IMRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The primary study population consisted of 9 patients treated with preoperative radiation for ESTS between 2008 and 2014 with LINAC-based static field IMRT. LINAC plans were designed to deliver 50 Gy in 25 fractions to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). Tri-(60)Co system IMRT plans were designed with ViewRay system software.

RESULTS

Tri-(60)Co-based IMRT plans achieved equivalent target coverage and dosimetry for organs at risk (long bone, skin, and skin corridor) compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The maximum and minimum PTV doses, heterogeneity indices, and ratio of the dose to 50% of the volume were equivalent for both planning systems. One LINAC plan violated the maximum bone dose constraint, whereas none of the tri-(60)Co plans did.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a tri-(60)Co system, we were able to achieve equivalent dosimetry to the PTV and organs at risk for patients with ESTS compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The tri-(60)Co system may be advantageous over current treatment platforms by allowing PTV reduction and by elimination of the additional radiation dose associated with daily image guidance, but this needs to be evaluated prospectively.

A retrospective tomotherapy image-guidance study: analysis of more than 9,000 MVCT scans for ten different tumor sites

The purpose of this study was to quantify the systematic and random errors for various disease sites when daily MVCT scans are acquired, and to analyze alterna- tive off-line verification protocols (OVP) with respect to the patient setup accuracy achieved. Alignment data from 389 patients (9,418 fractions) treated at ten differ- ent anatomic sites with daily image-guidance (IG) on a helical tomotherapy unit were analyzed. Moreover, six OVP were retrospectively evaluated. For each OVP, the frequency of the residual setup errors and additional margins required were calculated for the treatment sessions without image guidance. The magnitude of the three-dimensional vector displacement and its frequency were evaluated for all OVP. From daily IG, the main global systematic error was in the vertical direction (4.4-9.4 mm), and all rotations were negligible (less than 0.5°) for all anatomic sites. The lowest systematic and random errors were found for H&amp;N and brain patients. All OVP were effective in reducing the mean systematic error to less than 1 mm and 0.2° in all directions and roll corrections for almost all treatment sites. The treatment margins needed to adapt the residual errors should be increased by 2-5 mm for brain and H&amp;N, around 8 mm in the vertical direction for the other anatomic sites, and up to 19 mm in the longitudinal direction for abdomen patients. Almost 70% of the sessions presented a setup error of 3 mm for OVPs with an imaging frequency above 50%. Only for brain patients it would be feasible to apply an OVP because the residual setup error could be compensated for with a slight margin increase. However, daily imaging should be used for anatomic sites of difficult immobilization and/or large interfraction movement. 

Phase 2 study of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce wound and combined modality morbidities in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine if preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) can reduce morbidity, including wound complications, by minimizing dose to uninvolved tissues in adults with lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the development of an acute wound complication (WC). IG-IMRT was used to conform volumes to avoid normal tissues (skin flaps for wound closure, bone, or other uninvolved soft tissues). From July 2005 to June 2009, 70 adults were enrolled; 59 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median tumor size was 9.5 cm; 55 tumors (93%) were high-grade and 58 (98%) were deep to fascia.

RESULTS

Eighteen (30.5%) patients developed WCs. This was not statistically significantly different from the result of the National Cancer Institute of Canada SR2 trial (P = .2); however, primary closure technique was possible more often (55 of 59 patients [93.2%] versus 50 of 70 patients [71.4%]; P = .002), and secondary operations for WCs were somewhat reduced (6 of 18 patients [33%] versus 13 of 30 patients [43%]; P = .55). Moderate edema, skin, subcutaneous, and joint toxicity was present in 6 (11.1%), 1 (1.9%), 5 (9.3%), and 3 (5.6%) patients, respectively, but there were no bone fractures. Four local recurrences (6.8%, none near the flaps) occurred with median follow-up of 49 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30.5% incidence of WCs was numerically lower than the 43% risk derived from the National Cancer Institute of Canada SR2 trial, but did not reach statistical significance. Preoperative IG-IMRT significantly diminished the need for tissue transfer. RT chronic morbidities and the need for subsequent secondary operations for WCs were lowered, although not significantly, whereas good limb function was maintained.

Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study

BACKGROUND

The respiratory related target motion and setup error will lead to a large margin in the gastric radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric benefit and the possibility of incorporating the breath-hold (BH) technique with online image-guided radiotherapy in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

Setup errors and target motions of 22 post-operative gastric cancer patients with surgical clips were analyzed. Clips movement was recorded using the digital fluoroscopics and the probability distribution functions (pdf) of the target motions were created for both the free breathing (FB) and BH treatment. For dosimetric comparisons, two intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans, i.e. the free breathing treatment plan (IMRT(FB)) and the image-guided BH treatment plan (IMRT(IGBH)) using the same beam parameters were performed among 6 randomly selected patients. Different margins for FB and BH plans were derived. The plan dose map was convoluted with various pdfs of the setup errors and the target motions. Target coverage and dose to organs at risk were compared and the dose-escalation probability was assessed.

RESULTS

The mean setup errors were 1.2 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), 0.0 mm in the left-right (LR), and 1.4 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. The mean target motion for the free breathing (vs. BH) was 11.1 mm (vs. 2.2 mm), 1.9 mm (vs. 1.1 mm), and 5.5 mm (vs. 1.7 mm) in the SI, LR, and AP direction, respectively. The target coverage was comparable for all the original plans. IMRT(IGBH) showed lower dose to the liver compared with IMRT(FB) (p = 0.01) but no significant difference in the kidneys. Convolved IMRTIGBH showed better sparing in kidneys (p < 0.01) and similar in liver (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining BH technique with online image guided IMRT can minimize the organ motion and improve the setup accuracy. The dosimetric comparison showed the dose could be escalated to 54 Gy without increasing the critical organs toxicities, although further clinical data is needed.

Radiotherapy for management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas: why, when, and where?

This critical review will focus on published data on the indications for radiotherapy in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas and its role in local control, survival, and treatment complications. The differences between pre- and postoperative radiotherapy will be discussed and consensus recommendations on target volume delineation proposed.

Perioperative irradiation in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Adjuvant radiotherapy constitutes an important component of the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Extremity soft tissue sarcomas constitute a large proportion of this rare mesenchymal tumor. Questions regarding timing, techniques and toxicity come into play about optimizing adjuvant radiotherapy. This article will discuss recent trends and outcomes of perioperative, that is, preoperative and postoperative, irradiation.

The relationship between local recurrence and radiotherapy treatment volume for soft tissue sarcomas treated with external beam radiotherapy and function preservation surgery

PURPOSE

To examine the geometric relationship between local recurrence (LR) and external beam radiotherapy (RT) volumes for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with function-preserving surgery and RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty of 768 (7.8%) STS patients treated with combined therapy within our institution from 1990 through 2006 developed an LR. Thirty-two received preoperative RT, 16 postoperative RT, and 12 preoperative RT plus a postoperative boost. Treatment records, RT simulation images, and diagnostic MRI/CT data sets of the original and LR disease were retrospectively compared. For LR location analysis, three RT target volumes were defined according to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 29 as follows: (1) the gross tumor or operative bed; (2) the treatment volume (TV) extending 5 cm longitudinally beyond the tumor or operative bed unless protected by intact barriers to spread and at least 1-2 cm axially (the TV was enclosed by the isodose curve representing the prescribed target absorbed dose [TAD] and accounted for target/patient setup uncertainty and beam characteristics), and (3) the irradiated volume (IRV) that received at least 50% of the TAD, including the TV. LRs were categorized as developing in field within the TV, marginal (on the edge of the IRV), and out of field (occurring outside of the IRV).

RESULTS

Forty-nine tumors relapsed in field (6.4% overall). Nine were out of field (1.1% overall), and 2 were marginal (0.3% overall).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of STS tumors recur in field, indicating that the incidence of LR may be affected more by differences in biologic and molecular characteristics rather than aberrations in RT dose or target volume coverage. In contrast, only two patients relapsed at the IRV boundary, suggesting that the risk of a marginal relapse is low when the TV is appropriately defined. These data support the accurate delivery of optimal RT volumes in the most precise way using advanced technology and image guidance.

Detecting intra-fraction motion in patients undergoing radiation treatment using a low-cost wireless accelerometer

The utility of a novel, high-precision, non-intrusive, wireless, accelerometer-based patient orientation monitoring system (APOMS) in determining orientation change in patients undergoing radiation treatment is reported here. Using this system a small wireless accelerometer sensor is placed on a patient’s skin, broadcasting its orientation to the receiving station connected to a PC in the control area. A threshold-based algorithm is developed to identify the exact amount of the patient’s head orientation change. Through real-time measurements, an audible alarm can alert the radiation therapist if the user-defined orientation threshold is violated. Our results indicate that, in spite of its low-cost and simplicity, the APOMS is highly sensitive and offers accurate measurements. Furthermore, the APOMS is patient friendly, vendor neutral, and requires minimal user training. The versatile architecture of the APOMS makes it potentially suitable for variety of applications, including study of correlation between external and internal markers during Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT), with no major changes in hardware setup or algorithm.